Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Theatre Patient Story
Review of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist
An Associated University Hospital of Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Background
• A patient was scheduled for and had consented to ‘Total laparoscopic hysterectomy and left salpingo-oopherectomy, plus excision of endometriosis’
• A Never Event occurred: The patient also had her right ovary and fallopian tube removed during the procedure
• The event was not reported at the time. Trust managers only became aware, when the patient made a complaint a week after the procedure
• The patient expressed her concern to theatre matron and the lead investigator that this could happen again
After event review
• The after event review meeting reviewed the various steps that contributed to the incident taking place
• This included but was not limited to the use of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist
The WHO Surgical Safety Checklist
The Safer Surgery Saves Lives initiative was launched by the World Health Organisation (WHO) in 2008 to reduce the number of surgical errors and enhance patient safety during the perioperative phase of care
The launch saw the introduction of a new surgical safety checklist for surgical teams to use in perioperative environments as part of a major drive to make surgery safer worldwide (DH, 2008)
The NPSA (2009) has adapted this checklist for use in England and Wales and it is intended for use with all patients undergoing surgical procedures.
The checklist highlights generic core safety standards that may be applied to all perioperative settings and forms part of the 5 steps to safer surgery (NPSA, 2010)
The 5 Steps to Safer Surgery
1. The pre-operative briefing
2. The sign-in phase
3. The timeout
4. The sign-out phase
5. The de-brief
The AAR found that:
the pre-operative briefing took place
the sign-in took place in the anaesthetic room; patient identity and the correct, consented procedure were accurately confirmed
the time-out step was completed
the sign-out was completed but largely unremarkable
there was no debrief at the end of the list
Concerns • Using the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist did not prevent the
occurrence of a Never Event
• Monthly audit of the WHO Checklist, suggests that 100% of patients have a completed checklist, so: • Is the checklist completed as a tick box exercise rather than a tool
to ensure safety? • The theatre team are not giving safety a high enough priority
Actions Development of the theatre vision to foster team building
Identification of team objectives to develop ownership by theatre team
Identification of team behaviours
These activities led to the identification of safety as a priority among theatre teams Dedicated governance afternoon sessions to raise awareness of:
Never events
What is an incident?
How to report incidents
Responsibility for reporting
Actions Review of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist by matron and
lead for practice development
First draft shared with theatre team leaders
Subsequent drafts shared at ‘WHO Clinics’ on governance afternoons - feedback given by theatre teams
Feedback invited via clinical leads, divisional meetings and two week pilot
The current WHO Surgical Safety Checklist
Surgical Safety Checklist
The differences
Key steps highlighted with colour
Lead for each step is described
Questions simplified
Change in staff between step 1 and 2 recorded
Specific record of incidents and responsibility for reporting
Next steps
New checklist in use in operating theatres at ESH and CSSU by 1 April 2016
two week audit of theatre team engagement with use of current and new checklist
Review brief and debrief forms
Develop specialism specific safety checklists