Upload
nariko
View
60
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Water - Part I Mine Water Quality and Site Water Management. Presented by: Kelly SexsmithPeter McCreath SRK ConsultingClearwater Consultants. Part I – Mine Water Quality and Management Water Quality Issues Characterization of Mine Rock and PK - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The Water - Part I Mine Water Quality and Site
Water ManagementPresented by: Kelly Sexsmith Peter McCreath SRK Consulting Clearwater Consultants
Presentation Overview
• Part I – Mine Water Quality and Management– Water Quality Issues– Characterization of Mine Rock and PK– Concentration Estimates from Mine Rock and PK– Site Water Management– Water and Load Balance– Discharge Concentrations– Monitoring
• Part II – Receiving Water Quality• Part III – Water Treatment
Key Water Quality Issues
• Nutrients– Waste Stockpiles and PKCA– Sewage
• Suspended Solids– Waste Stockpiles and PKCA– Other Construction Areas
• Acid Rock Drainage and Metal Leaching Potential– Waste Rock Piles– Coarse Processed Kimberlite Stockpiles– Low Grade Kimberlite Stockpiles– Fine Processed Kimberlite
Geology Overview
Geochemical Tests
• Acid Base Accounting• Mineralogy• Metal Analyses• Leach Extraction Tests• Process Water Quality • Settling Tests• Water Quality of Seeps
from Development Pile
Test Results
• Granitic Rocks – ABA
• Low sulphur concentrations and low neutralization potential
• Low potential for acid generation– Extraction Tests
• Neutral pH’s and low concentrations of soluble trace metals
– Development Pile Seep Samples• Neutral pH’s• Somewhat elevated aluminum, copper, and
uranium concentrations• Low concentrations of other metals
Test Results
• Kimberlite Ore and Low Grade Ore – ABA
• Low sulphur concentrations and very high neutralization potential
– Leach Extraction Tests• Slightly alkaline pH’s • Slightly elevated cadmium molybdenum and nickel• Low concentrations of other soluble trace metals
• Coarse and Fine PK– All tests similar to the ore
Source Concentration Estimates
• Approach– Metals
• Scaling-up from short-term laboratory results• Reality Checks using data from other similar sites
– Nutrients• Ferguson and Leask Model• Comparisons with other sites• Existing data from site not representative because open pit
mines generate less residues
• What the Estimates Represent– Conditions at the base of the piles– “Short-term” water quality (i.e. highest concentrations)
Source Concentrations
Al mg/L
Cd mg/L
Cu mg/L
Ni mg/L
U mg/L
NH4mg/L
Average
Waste Rock and Overburden 0.59 0.00061 0.064 0.020 0.28 2.9
PK Supernatent 0.45 0.00016 0.0029 0.036 0.00014 0.08
Kimberlite Ore and LGO Stockpiles 0.25 0.0033 0.0031 0.18 0.0165 1.5
Coarse Kimberlite Stockpile 0.25 0.0042 0.0031 0.17 0.080 3.3
Upper Bound
Waste Rock and Overburden 0.87 0.00061 0.064 0.041 2.3 5.8
PK Supernatent 2.8 0.0005 0.0066 0.16 0.00056 0.17
Kimberlite Ore and LGO Stockpiles 0.25 0.0041 0.0045 0.18 0.03 2.9
Coarse Kimberlite Stockpile 0.25 0.0072 0.0045 0.18 0.16 6.6
Layout of Water Management Facilities
Supplementary Information
Key changes made in response to FEIS comments: • increased security and flexibility with water management,
i.e. may discharge directly or pump to PKCA prior to discharge or treat prior to discharge
• elimination of several small collection ponds due to footprint adjustments at dumps/stockpiles (1 catchment)
• addition of ditch C4 to reduce the catchment at Pond A
• addition of 2 collections ponds ( B and C)
• addition of several sumps/pumps at the plant site
• spillways added at PKCA and settling (polishing) pond
• contingency related to water quality (discussed by others)
PKCA Area(Water Storage)
Settling PondLake C3
Carat Lake
Open Pit and Underground
Mine
Waste Dump#2
Waste Dump#1
Overburden Stockpile
Processing Plant
Pond A
Pond B
Pond C
PitPond
Spray Irrigation Ore Stockpile
Coarse PK Stockpile
Low Grade Stockpile
Water Management Flow Diagram
Water Management Plan
• Water from waste dumps and stockpiles to be collected in 3 ponds (A, B and C); depending on water quality, pond water reports to either PKCA or environment
• Water from plant site to be collected in a series of sumps and/or Pond C; depending on water quality, pond water reports to either PKCA or environment
• Depending on water quality, water at PKCA is either directed to settling pond and discharged, or pumped to spray irrigation area (land application)
• Flocculants to be added at PKCA or settling pond, as necessary • Contingency related to water quality discussed elsewhere
Water Management Design Criteria
• Diversion Channels – 200 year peak instantaneous flow plus freeboard allowance
• Collection/Sediment Ponds A, B & C – combination of storage plus pumping for 200 year maximum snowmelt month plus sediment settling
• In-pit sump – 10 to 25 year event
• PKCA and Settling Pond spillways – Probable Maximum Precipitation inflow event
Water Balance – “Base Case”
• 8 years of ore processing
• average precipitation and evaporation conditions
• all water, runoff and seepage from all site components directed to PKCA
• no water reclaimed from PKCA to plant
• ice entrainment is extensive
• maximum pond level in the PKCA is el. 523 (spillway level)
• minimum allowable pond volume is 100,000 m3
• no release from PKCA for first 2 years of operation
• releases from PKCA commence in 3rd year (over June-Sept period, adjust rate for maximum dilution)
• maximum annual release is assumed to be 1,000,000 m3
PKCA Storage Volume Variation – “Base Case”
PKCA & Settling Pond Elevation Variation – “Base Case”
Discharge Concentrations Over Time
Discharge Concentrations
• Operations (Discharge from PKCA)
• Post Closure (Pit Water Quality)
Al mg/L
Cd mg/L
Cu mg/L
Ni mg/L
U mg/L
NH4mg/L
Average 0.51 0.0008 0.020 0.037 0.13 1.8
Upper Bound 1.0 0.0010 0.021 0.070 0.68 2.9
Al mg/L
Cd mg/L
Cu mg/L
Ni mg/L
U mg/L
NH4mg/L
Average 0.66 0.001 0.027 0.050 0.18 2.2
Mine Site Monitoring Stations
• PKCA Inputs– Collection Ponds A, B and C– Pit Sump– PK Supernatant (Process Water)– Recovery Plant Rejects Drainage– Treated Sewage
• PKCA Discharges