Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE USE OF LOOK SAY METHOD TO IMPROVE STUDENTS
READING SKILL AT THE EIGHTH GRADE
(A Pre Experimental Research at SMP Somba Opu)
THESIS
Submitted to the Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Makassar
Muhammadiyah University in Part Fulfillment of the Requirement for the Degree
of Educatio in English Department
Nilam Cahya
105351112616
ENGLISH EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
FACULTY OF TEACHERS TRAINING AND EDUCATION
MUHAMMADIYAH UNIVERSITY OF MAKASSAR
2020/2021
i
ii
iii
iv
v
vi
vii
viii
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MAKASSAR
FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
PRODI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
Jalan Sultan Alauddin No. 259Makassar
Telp : 0811 1782101(Secretary)
Email : [email protected] Web :
bg.fkip.unismuh.ac.id
vi
SURAT PERNYATAAN
Name : Nilam Cahya
Nim : 105351112616
Jurusan : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Program : S.1
Judul Skripsi : The Use of Look Say Method to Improve
Students Reading Skill at the Eighth Grade
Dengan ini menyatakan,
Skripsi yang saya ajukan didepan tim penguji adalah “hasil karya
saya sendiri bukan hasil ciplakan dan tidak dibuatkan oleh siapapun”.
Demikian pernyataan ini saya buat dengan sebenar-benarnya dan
bersedia menerima sanksi apabila dikemudian hari pernyataan ini tidak
benar sesuai dengan aturan yang berlaku.
Makassar, Januari
2021 Yang membuat
pernyataan
Nilam Cahya
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH MAKASSAR
FAKULTAS KEGURUAN DAN ILMU PENDIDIKAN
PRODI PENDIDIKAN BAHASA INGGRIS
Jalan Sultan Alauddin No. 259Makassar
Telp : 0811 1782101(Secretary)
Email : [email protected] Web :
bg.fkip.unismuh.ac.id
vii
SURAT PERJANJIAN
Name : Nilam Cahya
Nim : 105351112616
Jurusan : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris
Program : S.1
Judul Skripsi : The Use of Look Say Method to Improve
Students Reading Skill at the Eighth Grade
Dengan ini menyatakan perjanjian sebagai berikut :
1. Mulai dari penyusunan proposal sampai selesainya skripsi saya, saya
akan menyusun sendiri skripsi saya, dan tidak dibuatkan oleh
siapapun.
2. Dalam penyusunan skripsi, saya akan selalu melakukan konsultasi
dengan pembimbing.
3. Saya tidak akan melakukan penjiplakan (plagiat) dalam penyusunan
skripsi ini.
4. Apabila saya melanggar perjanjian seperti yang tertera pada poin 1,
2, dan 3 maka saya bersedia menerima sanksi sesuai aturan yang
berlaku.
Demikian surat perjanjian ini saya buat dengan penuh kesadaran dan
tanpa tendensi dari pihak manapun.
Makassar, Januari 2021
Yang membuat perjanjian
Nilam Cahya
viii
MOTTO
“If you have no actions to go with what you have learned, then you have learned
nothing” –Herbert Spencer
ix
ABSTRACT
NILAM CAHYA. 2020. The Use of Look Say Method to Improve Students Reading
Skill at the Eighth Grade in SMP Somba Opu. Thesis. English Education Department
Faculty of Teacher and Training Muhammadiyah University of Makassar. Ummi
Khaerati Syam and Eka Prabawati Rum.
This research aimed at whether or not the use of look say method effective to
improve the eighth grade students reading skill. This research was conducted at SMP
Somba Opu.
The method of this research was pre experimental. The subject of this research were
25 students at the eighth grade of SMP Somba Opu and this research used random
sampling technique to choose the subject. The instruments were the multiple choices
test and short answer question test. The objective of the research was intended to find
out whether or not the look say method effective to improve students' reading skill at
eighth grade in SMP Somba Opu.
The result of the analysis showed that the mean score of the pre-test was 41,2. Where,
none of the students passed “Excellent”, “Very good”, and “Good” criteria scores.
Besides, the mean score of the post-test was 72,4. Where 11 students passed the
“Good” criteria score it was 44%. It indicated that the implementation of Look Say
Method can improve the students‟ reading skill. It‟s strengthened by the result of
observation that showed that most of the students in the teaching learning process
were active and enthusiastic in joining the lesson. They were active in discussing and
understanding of the text.
Key words: reading skills, look say method and pre-experimental research
x
NILAM CAHYA. 2020. Penggunaan Metode Look Say untuk Meningkatkan
Keterampilan Membaca Siswa Kelas VIII di SMP Somba Opu. Tesis. Jurusan
Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas
Muhammadiyah Makassar. Ummi Khaerati Syam dan Eka Prabawati Rum.
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui efektif atau tidaknya penggunaan metode
Look Say untuk meningkatkan keterampilan membaca siswa kelas VIII. Penelitian ini
dilakukan di SMP Somba Opu.
Metode penelitian ini adalah pra eksperimental. Subjek penelitian ini adalah 25 siswa
kelas VIII SMP Somba Opu dan menggunakan teknik random sampling untuk
memilih subjeknya. Instrumen yang digunakan adalah tes pilihan ganda dan tes
pertanyaan jawaban pendek. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektif
atau tidaknya metode look say dalam meningkatkan keterampilan membaca siswa
kelas VIII di SMKT Somba Opu.
Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa nilai rata-rata pre-test adalah 41,2. Di mana, tidak
ada siswa yang lulus skor kriteria “Sangat Baik”, “Sangat Baik”, dan “Baik”. Selain
itu, nilai rata-rata post-test adalah 72,4. Dimana 11 siswa dinyatakan lulus dengan
kriteria “Baik” yaitu 44%. Hal tersebut menunjukkan bahwa penerapan Look Say
Method dapat meningkatkan keterampilan membaca siswa. Hal tersebut diperkuat
dengan hasil observasi yang menunjukkan bahwa sebagian besar siswa dalam proses
pembelajaran aktif dan antusias mengikuti pembelajaran. Mereka aktif berdiskusi dan
memahami teks.
Kata kunci: keterampilan membaca, metode look say dan penelitian pra
eksperimental
xi
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
In the name of Allah, Most Gracious, Most Merciful
Alhamdulillahi Rabbil Alamin, the researcher expresses her sincere gratitude
to the almighty God, Allah S. W. T, who has given guidance, mercy, and good health,
so that she could finish writing this thesis. Shalawat and salam are addressed to the
final chosen religious messenger, the Prophet Muhammad SAW who has changed the
human life.
The researcher realizes that many hands had given their helps and useful
suggestion for the completion of this thesis. Without the assistance of these people,
this thesis would never have existed. Therefore, the writer would like to express her
appreciation and sincere thanks to all of them particularly:
1. Prof. Dr. H. Ambo Asse, M.Ag. The Rector of the Makassar Muhammadiyah
University for his advices during the Researcher studies at the University.
2. Erwin Akib, S.Pd., M.Pd, Ph.D, the Dean of the FKIP Unismuh Makassar who
gave his valuable authorities and suggestion in doing this thesis.
xii
3. Ummi Khaerati Syam S.Pd., M.Pd. the Head of English Education Department of
FKIP UNISMUH Makassar, and also as the first consultant who gave her valuable
time and suggestion in doing this thesis.
4. My high appreciation and great thankful to my second consultant Eka Prabawati
Rum, S.Pd., M.Pd who has given her valuable time and guidance to finish this thesis.
5. The researcher deep appreciation for the headmaster of SMP Somba Opu and the
English teacher in SMP Somba Opu, who have spared their time and activities and
gave her valuable authorities and suggestion this research.
6. Many thanks for my beloved parent Warda. and Drs. Sultan, and all of my family
for the attention, support and their love.
7. My heartfelt thank to all lecturers of the FKIP UNISMUH especially to the
lecturers of English Department and all staffs of Muhammadiyah University of
Makassar for their guidance during the years of the Researcher‟s study.
Makassar, Januari 2021
The Researcher
xiii
TABLE OF CONTENTS
APPROVAL SHEET .................................................................................. i
CONTROLLING SHEET .......................................................................... ii
SURAT PERNYATAAN ............................................................................ vi
SURAT PERJANJIAN ............................................................................... vii
MOTTO ...................................................................................................... viii
ABSTRACT ................................................................................................. ix
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT .......................................................................... x
TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................... xiii
LIST OF TABLE ........................................................................................ xv
LIST OF APPENDICES ............................................................................ xvi
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION ...................................................................... 1
A. Background ......................................................................................... 1
B. Problem Statement ............................................................................. 4
C. Research Objective ............................................................................. 4
D. Significant of the Research ................................................................ 4
E. Scope of the Research ......................................................................... 5
CHAPTER II REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE ................................ 6
A. Previous Research Findings ................................................................ 6
B. Reading ................................................................................................. 8
1. Definition of Reading .................................................................... 8
2. The Purpose of Reading ................................................................. 9
C. Teaching Reading ................................................................................. 10
D. Four Main Methods Learning to Read .............................................. 10
E. Look Say Method .................................................................................. 11
1. Definition of Look and Say Method ............................................ 11
2. Technique to Teaching Look Say Method .................................. 12
3. Technique Principle of Look Say Method .................................. 14
4. The Advantages of Look Say Method ......................................... 14
F. Conceptual Framework ....................................................................... 15
CHAPTER III RESEARCH METHOD .............................................................. 17
A. Research Design .................................................................................. 17
B. Population and Sample ....................................................................... 18
C. Research variables .............................................................................. 18
D. Research Instrument .......................................................................... 19
E. Procedure of Collecting Data ............................................................. 20
F. Technique of Data Analysis ................................................................ 21
CHAPTER IV FINDINGS AND DISCUSSION ................................................. 25
A. FINDINGS ........................................................................................... 35
xiv
B. DISCUSSION ...................................................................................... 28
CHAPTER V CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION ......................................... 32
A. CONCLUSION ................................................................................... 32
B. SUGGESTION .................................................................................... 32
BIBLIOGRAPHY .................................................................................................... 34
APPENDIXES .......................................................................................................... 37
xv
LIST OF TABLE
Table 3.1 the classifying of students score ...................................................................................
Table 3.2 the Classifying of Testing .............................................................................................
Table 4.1 rate percentage of students reading skill using Look Say Method ...............................
Table 4.2 means score and standard deviation of using Look Say Method ..................................
Table 4.3 the t-test Value of Students Reading Skill ....................................................................
xvi
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix
A. The list name of the students
B. Students classification in pre-test and post-test
C. The row score of the students` pre-test and post-test
D. Table distribution of t-value
E. Rencana pelaksanaan pembelajaran (RPP)
F. Instrument
G. Flashcards
1
CHAPTER I
INTRODUCTION
A. Background
In teaching and learning of language, there are four skills; speaking,
writing, listening and reading. Among four language skills in English, reading is
one of the most important to be taught since reading is a source of knowledge, so
that students can get knowledge as the input of the learning process. Reading is
also an important part of learning English; because by reading people can
improve their vocabulary and also writing skills. By reading students can
comprehend and understand what they have learnt, so it can be said that reading
has an important role in students‟ achievement. It is strengthened by Nunan
(2003: 69) that state reading is considered to be the most important one, and also
strengthened by the statement of Krashen and Terrel (2000: 131) who state that
reading may be a source of comprehensible input and may contribute
significantly to competence in a second language. The competence covers both
oral and written performance.
In today‟s world, reading is basic to everyday life. As children we learn
to read, and as adults, we read to learn. We read to learn about the news, to learn
about rules, and to learn about how to do things (www.usalearn.org, n.d.). We
2
read a lot of words in daily activity. When there is a sentence or an
advertisement in everywhere that we are interested, we read them. Also, we read
messages every day, either in whatsapp, Facebook, twitter, etc. Getting the
information or understanding the textbook that is written in English, we need to
read many references such as mass media or the textbook itself. Reading skill is
an important factor in development of the quality of human life. Reading skill
plays an important role in teaching English as a second language. Learners who
have good reading ability will progress in their career and their future studies.
For those who study English as a second language, ability in English reading
comprehension is a must. Learners need reading comprehension to be able to
continually increase their knowledge (Sitthiprom: 2012).
Reading is also viewed as a highly effective means of extending
command of language so that it plays an important role in a classroom where
language is the main purpose (Nuttal, 2000: 30). Since reading is important,
teaching reading allocates much time in school context and the demand for it
receives more priority (Budiharso, 2004: 50). Knowing that reading is the most
important one of four skills, it becomes a challenge for the English teacher to
arouse students‟ motivation to read. It is because the students‟ motivation is low
(Nuttal, 2000:3). Students‟ motivation can be increased by setting the purpose
for reading. By knowing the purpose of reading, students are expected to grasp
3
what the reading text tells them about. Besides, they can easily determine the
information they want so they can read effectively.
Last year, when researchers conducted the trainee 1 and 2 at SMP Somba
Opu, the researcher found that there were still a lot of students who had
difficulty understanding the reading texts. From the classroom observation and
the interview with the English teacher, the researcher found some problems
related to the students` low proficiency level in reading comprehension. The
problems are related to the students and the learning materials.
The first problem is related to the students. From the observation in the
eighth grade, the researcher found that the students have low vocabulary
mastery. When they are given a text to read, they do not know the meanings of
most words in the text. This condition made the students find difficulties in
understanding the text. The second, the students are not interested in reading a
text. They do not enjoy reading an English text, it may be that they do not know
how to enjoy a book, an article and a text or feel that they want to do other
things like watch movies etc. In reference to the explanations above and the
strong desire of finding the solution to these problems, the researcher has the
motivation to research in improving students‟ reading skill by using Look Say
method. The researcher hoped that the method can improve students‟ reading
skill.
4
B. Problem Statement
Based on the statement above, the researcher formulates problem statement as
follows:
Is there any significant improvement by using the Look Say method
toward students‟ reading skills in understanding a text at eighth grade
students at SMP Somba Opu?
C. Research Objectives:
Based on the research problems, objective of the research is formulate as
follow:
To find out whether or not the look and say method is effective to
improve students‟ reading skill at eighth grade in SMP Somba Opu.
D. Significance of the Research
The researcher hope that the result of this study will give contribution to:
1. For the English students: the result of this study will give a new
experience for their reading learning by using this method, it also can
help them to be more effective, interested and an easier method to
improve their reading skill.
2. For the teachers: the result of this study to encourage the English
teachers in applying effective methods in teaching reading.
3. For the next researchers: the result of this study is expected to give
input and consideration for the next researcher who want to conduct
further research
5
E. Scope of the Research
This research would teach reading comprehension by using look say method
for eighth grade students at SMP Somba Opu. This study was delimited only on
increasing students' reading skill in understanding the text through "Look Say
Method".
6
CHAPTER II
REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE
A. Previous research findings
There are two previous studies that use the same method to teach reading
for young learners. Two researchers, Nurnianti (2012) and Budiana (2011) have
conducted their research on teaching reading by using Look and Say.
The first study was conducted by Budiana (2011) entitled “The Use of
Look and Say as a Technique in Teaching Reading to Elementary School
Students (the case of the fourth grade students of SD Negeri Kambangan 1,
Tegal in the academic year of 2010/2011). The research used Classroom Action
Research that had used two cycles. This study consist of four tests; pre-test,
formative test of cycle 1 and 2, and post-test. The result of the post-test indicated
that the students reading skill was improved after treatment. The mean score of
post-test was 83.89%. It was higher than the mean score of the pre-test
(58.10%). Based on the result of this study, the researcher assumed that learning
and teaching process by using Look Say technique was very enjoyable and great
technique for the students to improve their reading skill.
The second study was conducted by Nurnianti (2012) entitled "Teaching
Reading Using Look and Say technique at the Fifth Grade Pupils of SDN
7
Warung Bambu IV Karawang. The research used experimentation with
quantitative approach.
The results of this research showed that the mean score of the pre test
was 5 and score of the posttest was 6.78. Based on the data above, the teaching
reading using look say technique was effective. Based on the result of this
research showed that by using this technique students are more interested in
reading and they also easier to memorize word by word. The researcher stated
that look and say technique is one of the best technique to having a good
memory, and have a good memory can be a predictor for better reading
performance. Look and Say technique is also one of the best technique used to
read words that hard to read phonetically.
Based on the previous research above, the researcher concludes that the
Look and Say method can improve students' reading comprehension for young
learners. In addition, there are some differences between the previous research
and this research those are in previous study the researcher taught look say
method at Elementary School and applied classroom action and experimental
research as the research design while in this study the researcher will use pre
experimental research design with quantitative approach and it will be conducted
in Junior High School.
8
B. Reading
1. Definition of Reading
There are many definitions from the experts about reading. Reading is
the process of constructing meaning from written text. Reading is defined as a
message-getting, problem-solving activity which increases in power and
flexibility the more it is practiced. The definition states that within the
directional constraints of the printer's code, language and visual perception
responses are purposefully directed by the reader in some integrated way to the
problem of extracting meaning from cues in a text, in sequence, so that the
reader brings a maximum of understanding to the author's message Clay, M as
cited in nofiandari (2017).
Cline et.al (2006: 2), states that reading is decoding and understanding
written texts. Decoding requires translating the symbols of writing system
(including Braille) into the spoken words which they represent. Understanding is
determined by the purposes for reading, the context, the nature of the text, and
the readers‟ strategies and knowledge. Reading is the process of constructing
meaning from written texts. Intender is a complex skill requiring the
coordination of a number of interrelated sources of information (Anderson et al.,
1985). Wixson, Peters, Weber, & Roeber (as cited in sulistiani: 2014) Reading is
the process of constructing meaning through the dynamic interaction among: (1)
the reader's existing knowledge; (2) the information suggested by the text being
9
read; and (3) the context of the reading situation. Carrel (1983) stated that the
understanding of reading is best considered as the interaction that happen
between the reader itself and the text, an interpretive process.
Reading with young learners typically involves a wide range of
activities along with the reading itself. We read the images, read the text aloud,
retell the story with our own words, and carry out a series of playful activities
based on the text. However, a beautiful picture book isn't enough, language
teachers need extra materials to support their reading programmer and make
them successful.
2. The Purpose of Reading
Reading has some purpose and strategies to develop reading skills. Rivers
and Temperly (1978) suggest there are 7 main purposes of reading:
a) To get information for some goal or because we are want to know about
some topic.
b) To get instruction about some task for work or daily life
c) To act in play, e.g. play games..
d) To keep in touch with other people by understand business letters or
anything.
e) To know what is happening and has happened (e.g. in newspaper,
magazine, reports).
f) For pleasure or for fun.
10
It can be conclude that reading has purposes to get some knowledge
and also information, anything that is read.
C. Teaching Reading
Students should know what the purpose of reading is before they are
taught a reading lesson. So that is why before teaching reading, a teacher should
inform students about their purpose first. Knowing the purpose first is important
for them since by understanding the purpose of reading, the students can focus
on what they want so that they can read effectively. In the teaching of reading,
the teacher should provide strategy and activity in which the students can
identify the main and supporting ideas, rhetorical frames, and help the students
activate their background knowledge.
D. Main Methods Learning to Read (Ingrid Griggs: 2000)
main methods used to teach students how to read are:
1) Method 1: Phonics
The phonics method is probably the best known and widely used
method to teach reading and writing in the English language. It relies on
children being taught the alphabet first. They learn the names of the letters
and the sounds they make. Once they have learnt the letter sounds they will
begin to blend two letters together to make simple words then three letters,
then four and so forth.
2) Method 2: The Look and Say Method
11
With the look and say method, children learn to identify whole words
or sentences. The student will look at a word which you sound, and in turn
will repeat the word. This method use flashcards with individual words
written on them and frequently accompanied with picture that is relate to the
words. Write a short sentence which relate to the picture displayed. Say the
sentence and ask the students to repeat the word while looking at each
individual word as they repeats what you said.
E. Look and Say Method
1. Definition of Look and Say Method
"Look and Say method is a method that is used for teaching reading to
children about how to spell words in English" (Edhitin, 2000). Look and Say
technique is basically teaching children to read words as a whole and
recognize words in a text. More than three decades of research with both
normal and brain damaged children have resulted in this method. Doman
(1989: 75) stated that Look and Say method has been known for a very long
time. Doman suggest to use this method to teaching. He sets up "the first baby
hot-housing program in USA in the 1960s".
According to Griggs (2000) to teach look and say methods in the school,
the teacher shows the children the word and says it while pointing to the
object. The students must repeat the word. This happens several times with
each word. Thus, the Look and Say method is considered as a highly
12
successful method of early childhood learning. Scott (1965: 48) stated that
teaching reading to children could be both damaging and useless, she also
suggests to learning of reading be combine with learning of writing. That is
why she suggests that parents should reading to them bedtime stories, because
they it is a key in developing children reading skill.
Reported by Maulizan (2015) Look and say method is a method of
teaching learner to read by memorizing and recognizing whole words. Look
and Say Teaching Method is based on having children recognize full short
sentences. This is done through flashcards with pictures, where parents can
read each word on the card while the child repeats it. If a picture card is not
used the child will guess what is on the card, which is not the idea, so picture
cards must be used. By pointing at each word as the parent reads the
sentences, children will start to learn each word. Once having gone over many
cards, and hopefully backed by other techniques like the Phonetics Method,
children will eventually start understanding written language. Look and Say
can be used during individual or group sessions or classes in pre-schools,
special schools, integrated educational institutions or early years of primary
school.
2. Technique to teaching Look and Say Method
To teach look and say methods in the school, the teacher shows the
children the word and says it while pointing to the object. The students must
13
repeat the word. This happens several times with each word. The introduction
of the word only takes a short time, and goes quiet quickly, so the teacher may
spend five minutes of a thirty minute lesson on four new words. There are a
lot of word recognition games which can be done at this stage. Such as
matching words and pictures, pointing to the object on the card, guessing
which card. Thus, this method push the students to recognize kind of words
and phrases before reading a text.
In this study the researcher chooses matching words or sentences and
pictures as the method in look and say. There are many steps to apply in look
and say:
1) First steps, provide material in the form of text with theme home activities.
2) Second steps, provide flash card in the form of sentences and accompanied
with picture, then stick it in the blackboard and arrange it randomly.
3) Third steps, invite students to read the text accompanied with the meaning.
4) The next steps, divided students into three groups and one member of every
group to come in front of the class. Then the teacher read the text in randomly
and the students must be looking which sentence that the teacher read. After
that the students must be repeat the sentences with correct pronunciation and
match the sentence with the picture.
14
5) The last steps, students must be answer one question correctly based on the
text. When the students can read the sentence correctly and answer the
question, they will get a point.
"Look and say is" not the only method used to teach reading in a
foreign language. Beginners can also be taught by a teacher reading
sentence by sentence from a carefully selected passage, explaining its
meanings wherever necessary.
3. Teaching principles of Look and Say Method
New words are introduced to the child by letting them see and hear the
word, and also see a picture referring to the word. Flashcard is often used with
individual words and accompanied with picture. The flashcard are shown over
and over to the child until they memorizes the word.
4. The Advantages of Look and Say Method
As reported by Children`s Books and Reading` blog (n.d), there are
some advantages of look say method:
6) Ultimately all children need to be able to recognize whole words to become
fluent readers.
7) By using the look and say method a child can read up and recognize any
word.
8) This teaching method is easy to understand for the parent or teacher because
this method is focus to words.
15
9) Especially this method lends itself to teaching young toddlers to read.
10) Children learn to automatically recognize a small selection of words.
F. Conceptual Frameworks:
The researcher used pre-experimental as methodology and used quantitative
approach with one group pre-test and post-test in the research. The student's did a
pre-test and post-test to take their score before and after learn by using “Look and
Say method”. Then both of the score are compute by using t-test to find out if
there is significant influence of teaching reading by using “Look and Say
method”.
INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT
Reading
Comprehension
Teaching Reading
Using Look and
Say Method
Look and Say
Method (flashcard)
Reading Test
(Multiple choice and
short answer question)
Student‟s Reading
Comprehension
Understanding
the text
16
The researcher conducted a post-test consist of multiple choice and fill the
blank where the test was about descriptive text. As cited in British Course (2017)
explained by Kane (2000: 352), description is about sensory experience—how
something looks, sounds, tastes. Mostly it is about visual experience, but description
also deals with other kinds of perception. Thus, if we conclude it from Kane‟s
explanation above, the descriptive text is meaningful text that describes the
experience related to the senses, such as what shape, sound, taste is.
After the researcher gave treatment using look and say method, the researcher
gave a post-test to measure students reading skill. According to Davis (1968) reading
skills involve: identifying word meaning, drawing inferences, identifying writer‟s
technique, recognizing mood of passage, finding answers to questions.
G. Hypothesis
H0 : There is no significant difference students reading skill in understanding the text
before and after treatment using Look Say Method
H1 : There is significant difference students reading skill in understanding the text
before and after treatment using Look Say Method
17
CHAPTER III
RESEARCH METHOD
A. Research Design
The method in this research was pre-experimental with a quantitative
approach. Pre-experimental is to know or to test the effectiveness of using Look
and Say Method in teaching reading for the eighth grade students of SMP
Somba Opu.
This study conducted in pre-experimental and used quantitative approach
with one group pre-test and post-test design. The researcher just takes one class
and used pre-test and post-test to see the result of the treatment.
According to Ary (2002: 22), quantitative research uses objective
standard and analysis statistical of numeric data to understand and explain
phenomena. Experimental research involves a study of the effect of the
systematic manipulation of one variable on another variable and non-
experimental research; the researcher identifies variables, but does not
manipulate the variables (Ary, 2002: 24).
The experimental research design is classified into pre-experimental
design, true experimental and quasi experimental. Pre-experimental research
does not have random assignment of subject to groups or other strategies to
control extraneous variables. True-experimental research uses randomization
18
and provides maximum control of extraneous variables. Whether quasi
experimental research lack randomization but employ other strategies to provide
some control over extraneous variables (Ary et al, 2002:302).
B. Population and Sample
1. Population
The population of this research was the students of SMP Somba opu
There are five classes, which each class consists of VII A = 40 students, VII B
= 38 students, VIII A =32 students, VIII B = 32 students, IX = 32 students, XI
A = 20 students, XI B = 30 students, XII A = 28 students, XII B = 26
students, XIII = 25 students . Thus, the population of this research is 313
students.
2. Sample
In this study, the researcher used a random sampling technique to
choose the sample. There were two classes in eighth, the researcher used
random sampling to choose one of the classes to conducted the research. The
researcher used a piece of paper, and then the researcher wrote the class of the
paper, after that the paper folded and the researcher chose one of the papers
randomly.
C. Research Variable
The variables in this experimental study were two classifications:
a. Independent variable
19
The independent variable was teaching reading by using “Look and Say
method”
b. Dependent variable
Besides, the dependent variable was students' achievement in reading.
D. Research Instrument
There were two kinds of instruments that used in collecting data of the
students, namely multiple choices and short answer question.
1. The Multiple Choice Tests
The multiple choice test was given to the student`s to find out the students`
ability in reading before and after being taught using Look and Say Method. The test
consists of 10 items that covers two topics. Further, in order to maintain the reliability
of the test, the researcher arranged the test and discusses it with the teacher. The
researcher chose the multiple choice test to make sure whether or not the students can
understand the reading text.
2. Short Answer Question test
The short answer question test was given to the student`s with the multiple
choice test, also to find out the students` ability in reading before and after being
taught using Look and Say Method. The test consists of 5 items. The researcher
arranged the test and discusses it with the teacher. The researcher chose the multiple
choice test to make sure whether or not the students can understand the reading text.
20
E. Procedure of Collecting Data
In this study, the researcher conducted pre-test and post-test to collect the data.
The researcher conducted pre-test to know the students' reading ability before the
researcher gives treatment. And the researcher conducted post-test to the students'
after the researcher give a treatment. Then the researcher compared the results of pre-
test and post-test.
a. The researcher conducted multiple choice and short answer question in
pretest, the researcher did the procedure as follows:
1) The researcher consulted to the teacher about the test.
2) The researcher explained to the student‟s about the multiple choice
and short answer test.
3) The researcher distributed the test to the student‟s.
4) The researcher gave 30 minutes to answer the test.
5) The researcher collected the test from the student‟s.
b. The researcher conducted multiple choice and short answer question in
posttest, the researcher did the procedure as follows;
1) The researcher gave treatment to the student‟s using Look and Say
Method in three meetings.
2) In the first meeting, the researcher provided picture cards with
individual words written on them.
21
3) The researcher makes sure that every student can see the picture and
read the words in the cards.
4) The second meeting, the researcher provided picture cards with two
words written on them.
5) The researcher makes sure that every student can see the picture, read
the words, and understand the meaning in the cards.
6) The third meeting, the researcher provided picture cards with very
short sentence written on them.
7) The researcher makes sure that every student can see the picture, read
the sentence, and understand the meaning in the cards.
8) After three meetings of treatment by using Look and Say Method, the
researcher gave post-test to the students. The researcher used the same
kinds/types of test which is use in pre-test.
9) The researcher collected the test and compares the result.
F. Technique of Data Analysis
In collecting data, the data obtained through the multiple choices (pretest
and posttest). The researcher analyzed the data that have been collect from the
sample by use following techniques:
1. Converting students‟ score by using the following formula:
students‟ correct answer
Score = X 100
total of question
22
(Rosmala Sari, 2004)
2. Classifying the score of the students into the following criteria:
Table 3.1 the classifying of students score
3. N
o
Interval Score Classification
1 9.6 - 10.0 Excellent
2 8.6 - 9.5 Very Good
3 7.6 - 8.5 Good
4 6.6 - 7.5 Fairly Good
5 5.6 - 6.5 Fair
6 4.6 - 5.5 Poor
7 0 - 3.5 Very Poor
(Depdikbud, 2006)
4. The frequency and the rule percentage of the students score:
Where:
P : Percentage
F : Frequency
N : The total number of students
(Gay, 2012)
23
5. Converting mean score, the formula is:
∑
Where : Mean
∑ Sum all of scores
Number of students
Gay (1981 : 298 ).
6. The formulas use to finding out the students improvement:
Where:
P : The students improvement
X1 : The mean score of the pre-test
X2 : The mean score of the post-test
(Gay, 2012)
7. The formulas use in finding out the difference between students‟ score in pre-
test and post-test:
√∑ ∑
24
Where:
D : Mean score
∑D : The sum of all the scores
N : The total number of students
T : test of significance
(Gay, 2012)
8. The criteria used to accept or reject the hypothesis
Table 3.2 The Classifying of Testing
Testing Null Hypothesis Alternative Hypothesis
t-test > t-table Rejected Accepted
t-test < t-table Accepted Rejected
9. The Indicators of students successful in reading comprehension according to
Dechant (1982: 314), the good comprehended possesses the ability to:
a. Have an adequate meaning vocabulary.
b. Understand words in context and choose the meaning that fits the
context.
c. Be able to answer literal question about a passage.
25
CHAPTER IV
FINDINGS AND DISCUSSING
A. Findings
The findings of the research were based on the results of the data
analysis. The reading skill test consisted of pre-test and post-test. The pre-test
gave to find out the students reading skill in understanding text before being
taught look say method, and post-test gave to find out the whether or not there
is an improvement of students reading skill after giving the treatment. There
were the students score classification, the mean scores of the pre-test and
post-test, and the result of the difference between students pre-test and post-
test. These findings describe as follows.
1. The Students Score Classification
Table 4.1 rate percentage of students reading skill using Look Say Method
no classification Score frequency Percentage
Pre-test Post-test Pre-test Post-test
1 Excellent 9.6-10 0 0 0% 0%
2 Very good 8.6-9.5 0 0 0% 0%
3 Good 7.6-8.5 0 11 0% 44%
4 Fairly good 6.6-7.5 0 9 0% 36%
5 Fairly 5.6-6.5 2 5 8% 20%
6 Poor 3.6-5.5 15 0 60% 0%
26
7 Very poor 0-3.5 8 0 32% 0%
The data in table 4.1 above shows the frequency and percentage of
students reading skill before and after using Look Say Method. From the
table, it can be seen pre-test result that none of the students got “Excellent”,
“Very good”, “Good”, and “Fairly good”. There were 2 students (8%)
classified into “Fairly”, there were 15 students (60%) classified unto “Poor”
and there were 8 students (32%) classified into “Very poor”.
While for the post-test result, there still none of the students got
“Excellent” and “Very good”, but there were 11 students (44%) classified into
“Good”, also there were 9 students (36%) classified into “Fairly good”, and
there were 5 students (20%) classified into “Fairly”. And none of the students
got “Poor” and “Very poor”.
Based on the explanation above the score and the percentage of the
students reading skill achievement in understanding the text of the post-test
were better than the pre-test because in the rate percentage of the post-test was
higher than the percentage of the pre-test.
2. Students Mean Score and Standard Deviation
Table 4.2 mean score and standard deviation of using Look Say
Method
27
Types of test Mean score Standard
deviation
Pre-test
Post-test
41.2
72.4
5.5
5.17
Table 4.2 shows that the students mean score of pre-test before
treatment was 41.2, while the score of post-test after treatment was
72.4 and the standard deviation of pre-test was 5.5 while the standard
deviation of post-test was 5.17. It means that there was increase of
students reading skill after using Look Say Method.
3. Hypothesis Test
To prove whether the used of Look Say method is effective to enhance
students‟ reading skill and also to know the significant level of t-table the
researcher used t-test analysis on the level of significance 0.05 with the degree
of freedom (df) = N-1, where the N = number of subject (25 students) and the
value of t-table is 2.064.the result shows in the following table.
Table 4.3 The t-test Value of Students Reading Skill
Variable t-test t-table Comparison classification
Reading
Skill
28.8 2.064 t-test > t-table Significantly
different
28
The table above showed that the t-test value was higher than
the t-table value. It means that there was significant improvement in
students reading skill after being taught using look say method.
B. Discussion
At this stage, the result of the research on the use of look say method
to improve students reading skill at the eighth grade, by referring to the
research objective, are to explain the process of using look say method to
improve students reading skill at the eighth grade. The objectives of this
research are to find out whether or not the look say method effective to
improve students‟ reading skill at eighth grade in SMP Somba Opu. To reach
the objectives of the research, the researcher conducted some steps. The
researcher used test as instrument of the research to get the data. The steps to
collect the data there are pre-test, giving treatment in three meetings, and post-
test in the last meeting.
The description of previous section shows students reading skill is
increase, it was supported by the frequency, rate percentage and students
mean score before and after treatment using Look Say method. Based on the
finding above, students reading skill in terms of understanding the text is
significantly increase after getting the treatment by using Look Say Method.
After the test, the result showed that the mean score of pretest was
41.2 and the mean score of post-test was 72.4. It can be indicated that the
29
reading skill of the student in terms of understanding the text had been
increased after getting the treatment by using Look and Say method. Students'
reading achievement, this could also be seen from the presentation of the pre-
test and post-test results for the eighth grade students of SMP Somba Opu.
This finding was supported by two previous studies that used Look
and Say method in teaching reading. In the previous study, Budiana (2011)
stated that the used of Look Say method was effective to improve the
students‟ reading comprehension ability at the fourth grade students of SD
Negeri Kambangan 1. The research used Classroom Action Research that had
used two cycles. From other previous study Nurnianti (2012) also showed that
the use of Look and Say method also effective to improve students reading
ability for the fifth grade pupils of SDN Warung Bambu IV Karawang. This
research used experimental with quantitative approach.
While this research was conducted at the eighth grade and used a pre-
experimental research design. Budiana (2011) assumed that learning English by
using Look and Say technique was very enjoyable and lively technique for the
students to improve their reading skill. On the other hand, Nurnianti (2012)
stated that look and say technique is concerned having a good memory can be a
predictor for better reading performance in the future. That statement goes along
with the result of this research, which is after the students being given the
30
treatment using look say method their reading achievement was improved, and
they were enjoy the class.
According to Griggs (2000) to teach look and say method in the
school, the teacher shows the children the word and says it while ask the
students to see the picture. The students must repeat the word. This happens
several times with each word. Thus, Look and Say method is considered as a
highly successful method early childhood learning. Thus, the researcher
applied Look and Say method to teach reading in the junior high school. This
Look and Say method can be used effectively in the classroom to increase
reading achievement of students at junior high school.
Based on the findings, the result of post-test showed that Look and
Say method is very effective in teaching and learning reading process. (Nuttal,
2000:30) said that reading is also viewed as a highly effective means of
extending command of language. Therefore, it plays an important role in the
classroom where language is the main purpose. Knowing that reading is the
most important, it becomes a challenge for the English teacher to improve
students‟ motivation and students reading skill. According to Beare (2013),
reading is important part of learning English. It is important because students
always deal with the texts that they have to understand. In order to achieve an
understanding of reading, students should have the ability of reading
comprehension.
31
The look say method can be one of strategies that the teachers can use to
challenge their selves to improve students reading skill. As reported by
Children`s Books and Reading` blog (n.d), there are some advantages by
using look say method, among others are, a child can learn to recognize any
word using the look and say method and this teaching method is easy to grasp
for the parent or teacher as it is based on words. This statement is in line with
the researcher experienced because during the research, the researcher could
see some advantages of using Look and Say method for the students reading
achievement, there are; the students looked enjoy, interested and fun with the
method, and students also easily to understand the material about reading
because they are given many kinds of flash card with picture and words
collaborate with any games of Look and Say. By using all of them, the
students were enjoying to join the teaching learning process in the classroom.
So, the students reading skill in terms of understanding the text after being
taught by using Look and Say method was increased
32
CHAPTER V
CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion
Look Say method is effective to increase students reading skill at the
eighth grade of SMP Somba Opu. It is proved by the result of means scores
pre-test and post-test of the students has increase. The mean scores in pre-test
was 41.2 after giving the treatment the mean scores in post-test of the students
has increase 72.4.
Based on students‟ response, they were interested during teaching and
learning process in using Look and Say method. It made the students enjoy to
study English especially in reading. It also helped the students more active
and enthusiastic to increase their ability in pronounce the words, so they
easier to read many kinds of texts. Therefore, Look and Say method was
effective to increase students‟ reading achievement and it was suggested to be
used in teaching reading, especially at the eighth grade students of SMP
Somba Opu.
B. Suggestion
Based on the result of the study using Look Say method is an effective
way to improve students reading skill. Thus, the researcher suggests the
following things.
33
It is suggested to the English teachers to use Look Say method as one
of method in teaching and learning process especially in reading class. Look
Say method gives a variation in teaching and learning process because it use
picture that makes students enthusiastic to learn English. Thus, it gave a
positive progress on the students‟ reading achievement.
It is suggested for the students to practice and learn more by using
look say not only in the class but also in their daily activity.
It is suggested for the next researcher that they conducted similar
researches for the sake of getting better results of the research.
34
BIBLIOGRAPHY
Anderson, R., Hiebert, E., Scott, J., & Wilkinson, I. (1985).Becoming a nation of
readers: The report of the commission on reading. Washington, DC: National
Institute of Education and the Center for the Study of Reading.Arikunto,
Suharsini. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta:
PT. Rineka Cipta.
Ary, Donald and friends. (2002). Introduction to research in education. USA:
Wadsworth Group.
Beare, K. (2014). Improve Reading Skiil. Online.
http://esl.about.com/od/englishreadingskills/a/readingskills.htm. Accessed 25
December 2020.
Budiana, Agnes Arum. (2011). The Use of Look and Say as a Technique in Teaching
to Elementary School Students (The Case of the Fourth Grade Students of SD
Negeri Kambangan 1, Tegal in the academic Year of 2010/2011).
Shttps://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://pdfs.sem
anticscholar.org/0944/854a90f3ef1d8fd5e178202e5a4152be882a.pdf&ved=2
ahUKEwiolL3VpO_oAhXO7XMBHTBcBdoQFjAGegQIARAB&usg=AOv
Vaw13YNPlIekrvB3OBHg66vmr. Accessed 14 April 2020.
Budiharso, Teguh. (2004). Prinsip dan Strategi Pengajaran Bahasa. Surabaya:
Lutfansyah Mediatama.
Carrel, N. (1983). A longitudinal study of effects of a kindergarten reading
programme. Digital Dissertations: In WikEd.
Choi, Y. H. & Spolsky, B. (2009). English Language Teacher Education in Asia.
Asia: eduKLC.
Children`s Books and Reading (n.d). Look and Say teaching Method.
http://www.childrens-books-and-reading.com/look-and-
say.html#:~:text=Advantages,the%20look%20and%20say%20method.
Accessed 14 April 2020.
35
Cline, F., Johnstone, C., & King, T. (2006) Focus Group Reaction to Three Definition
of Reading (as Originally Developed in Support NARAP Goal 1).
Minneapolis, M.N.: National Accessible Reading Assessment Project.
Doman, G. (1989). How To teach your Baby to Read. Philadelphia: The Baby Press.
Edhitin, G. (2000). Developing Reading Skill for EFL Students. Jakarta: Departmen
Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Indonesia.
Gay, L.R. (2006). Education Research: Competence for Analysis and Applications.
Fifth edition:ed. Colombus: Charles E. Meril Publushing Company
Griggs, Ingrid. (2000). Four Main Methods Learning to Read.
http://www.teachingtreasures.com.au/homeschool/readingmethods/lookandsa
y.html. Accessed 30 November 2019.
Harmer, Jeremy. (1998). How to Teach English; an introduction to the practice of
English language teaching. Malaysia: Addison Wesley Longman.
Iftanti, Erna. (2015). What Makes Efl Students Establish Good Reading Habits In
English. State Islamic Institute of Tulungagung (IAIN Tulungagung).
http://www.ijern.com/May-2015.php. Accessed 30 November 2019.
Krashen, S. D. and Terrell D. T. (2000). The Natural Approach: Language
Acquisition in the Classroom. Malaysia: Pearson Education.
Maulizan (2015) Teaching Reading Comprehension to EFL Junior High School
Students . English Education Journal.
http://www.jurnal.unsyiah.ac.id/EEJ/article/view/2580. Accessed 14 April
2020
Noviandari, N. (2017). The Effectiveness of Using “Look And Say Method” in
Teaching Reading to Increase Students’ Reading Achievement for the Fourth
Grade The Students of MI Baiturrahman Suwaluh Academic Year
2015/2016. State Islamic Institute of Tulungagung.
https://www.google.com/url?q=http://repo.iain-
tulungagung.ac.id/4640/&sa=U&ved=2ahUKEwiU-
36
Liei7qAhWF7XMBHW-
pCewQFjAMegQIChAB&usg=AOvVaw1W2Ped5A5x_K7RAtH2twlI.
Accessed 30 November 2019..
Nunan, David. (2003). Practical English Language Teaching. Singapore: The
McGraw Hill Companies.
Nurnianti, Siska. (2012). Teaching Reading Using Look and Say Technique at the
Fifth Grade Pupils of SDN Warung Bambu IV Karawang. Bandung:Sekolah
Tinggi Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan (STKIP) Siliwangi Bandung.
Nuttal, C. (2000). Teaching Reading Skill in Foreign Language. Thailand: MacMilan
Publishers Limited.
Rivers and Temperly. (1978). „Seven Main Purposes for Reading. In et. al. Members
of the Newbury House ESL/EFL‟. Second Language & Learning. Canada:
Heinle & Heinle Publiser.
Rosmalasari. (2004). Imropoving Students’ Writing Ability of Smkn 1 Pinrang
Trhough Pararrel Writing Technique. FBS.UNM
Scott, A Wendy and Lisbeth H. Streberg. (2010). Teaching English to Children. New
York: longman.
Sitthiprom, P. (2012). „The development of English reading comprehension ability of
grade 11 students using metacognitive strategies‟. International Journal of
Social Science and Humanity, 2(6), 543.
Sulistiani, Endah. (2014). The Effectiveness of Using Mind Mapping Teachnique on
Student Achievement of Reading Narrative Text in the Second Grade Student
of MTS Negeri Bandung in Academic Year 2013/2014.
Warta madrasah. (2017). Definition of Reading.
http://www.wartamadrasahku.com/2017/05/definition-of-reading.html?m=1.
Accessed 30 November 2019.
37
www.uselearn.org. (n.d.). Reading to Learn English.
https://www.uselearn.org/reading-to-learn-english. Accessed 30 November
2019.
38
APPENDIX A
THE LIST NAME OF THE STUDENTS
No Sample Code
1 AINUN ANSAR Std-1
2 ASRIYANTI YUNI Std-2
3 BAYU ANDIKA Std-3
4 FEBRIANA AWAK Std-4
5 IFANO Std-5
6 IRFAN Std-6
7 JULIANUS F ANDIKA Std-7
8 KASMAWATI Std-8
9 MELVIANA RAMADHANI BASIR Std-9
10 MUHAMMAD ALDIYANSYAH ANWAR Std-10
11 MUHAMMAD ALIEF DARMAWANGSYAH Std-11
12 MUHAMMAD NUR PRATAMA Std-12
13 MUH. REZA Std-13
14 MUH. RIAN Std-14
15 MUH. RUSLI Std-15
16 NURLIAH Std-16
17 NURUL AGUSTINA Std-17
18 RANDI Std-18
19 RASMAWATI Std-19
20 USMAN Std-20
21 NURHIKMAH Std-21
22 SELIA NURHIKMA AZIS Std-22
23 M. FAHRI ARIFIN PRATAMA Std-23
24 ARMANDO STEFANO ATABUI Std-24
25 RAHMAT ARIFIN Std-25
APPENDIX B
STUDENTS CLASSIFICATION IN PRE-TEST AND POST-TEST
No Students Code Pre-test Classification Post-test Classification
1 Std-1 40 Poor 80 Good
2 Std-2 40 Poor 70 Fairly good
3 Std-3 50 Poor 70 Fairly good
4 Std-4 50 Poor 70 Fairly good
5 Std-5 30 Very poor 70 Fairly good
6 Std-6 30 Very poor 60 Fairly
7 Std-7 30 Very poor 70 Fairly good
8 Std-8 30 Very poor 60 Fairly
9 Std-9 60 Very poor 70 Fairly good
10 Std-10 40 Poor 60 Fairly
11 Std-11 30 Very poor 60 Fairly
12 Std-12 40 Poor 80 Good
13 Std-13 50 Poor 80 Good
14 Std-14 30 Very poor 70 Fairly good
15 Std-15 30 Very poor 60 Fairly
16 Std-16 40 Poor 80 Good
17 Std-17 40 Poor 80 Good
18 Std-18 50 Poor 80 Good
19 Std-19 40 Poor 80 Good
20 Std-20 50 Poor 80 Good
21 Std-21 50 Poor 80 Good
22 Std-22 30 Very poor 60 Fairly
23 Std-23 60 Fairly 80 Good
24 Std-24 50 Poor 80 Good
25 Std-25 40 Poor 70 Fairly good
APPENDIX C
THE ROW SCORE OF THE STUDENTS PRE-TEST AND POST-TEST
No Students code Pre-test
score ( )
Post-test
score ( )
( - ) ( -
1 Std-1 40 80 40 1600
2 Std-2 40 70 30 900
3 Std-3 50 70 20 400
4 Std-4 50 70 20 400
5 Std-5 30 70 40 1600
6 Std-6 30 60 30 900
7 Std-7 30 70 40 1600
8 Std-8 30 60 30 900
9 Std-9 60 70 10 100
10 Std-10 40 60 30 900
11 Std-11 30 60 30 900
12 Std-12 40 80 40 1600
13 Std-13 50 80 30 900
14 Std-14 30 70 30 900
15 Std-15 30 60 30 900
16 Std-16 40 80 40 1600
17 Std-17 40 80 40 1600
18 Std-18 50 80 30 900
19 Std-19 40 80 30 900
20 Std-20 50 80 30 900
21 Std-21 50 80 30 900
22 Std-22 30 60 30 900
23 Std-23 60 80 20 400
24 Std-24 50 80 30 900
25 Std-25 40 70 30 900
N = 25 ∑ = 1.030 ∑ = 1.810 ∑D = 770 ∑ = 24.400
MEAN 41.2 72.4 30.8 976
Calculating the Students Mean Score
- Pre-test mean score:
∑
= 41.2
- Post-test mean score:
∑
= 72.9
Calculating t-test value
∑D = 770
∑
N = 25
D = ∑
= 30.8
√∑
∑
=
√
=
√
=
√
=
√
=
√
=
t = 28.8
APPENDIX D
TABLE DISTRIBUTION OF T-VALUE
Level of Significance (D) = 0,05
Degree of Freedom (df) = N-1 = 25-1 = 24
df/α 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.05 0.02 0.01 0.001
1 0.158 1 2 3.078 6.314 12.706 31.821 64 637
2 0.142 0.816 1.386 1.886 2.92 4.303 6.965 10 31.598
3 0.137 0.765 1.25 1.638 2.353 3.182 4.541 5.841 12.929
4 0.134 0.741 1.19 1.533 2.132 2.776 3.747 4.604 8.61
5 0.132 0.727 1.156 1.476 2.015 2.571 3.365 4.032 6.869
6 0.131 0.718 1.134 1.44 1.943 2.447 3.143 3.707 5.959
7 0.13 0.711 1.119 1.415 1.895 2.365 2.998 3.499 5.408
8 0.13 0.706 1.108 1.397 1.86 2.306 2.896 3.355 5.041
9 0.129 0.703 1.1 1.383 1.833 2.263 2.821 3.25 4.781
10 0.129 0.7 1.093 1.372 1.812 2.228 2.764 3.169 4.587
11 0.129 0.697 1.088 1.363 1.796 2.201 2.718 3.106 4.437
12 0.128 0.695 1.083 1.356 1.782 2.179 2.681 3.055 4.318
13 0.128 0.694 1.079 1.35 1.771 2.16 2.65 3.012 4.221
14 0.128 0.692 1.076 1.345 1.761 2.145 2.624 2.977 4.14
15 0.128 0.691 1.074 1.341 1.753 2.131 2.602 2.947 4.073
16 0.128 0.69 1.071 1.337 1.746 2.12 2.583 2.921 4.015
17 0.128 0.689 1.069 1.333 1.74 2.11 2.567 2.898 3.965
18 0.127 0.688 1.067 1.33 1.734 2.101 2.552 2.878 3.922
19 0.127 688 1.066 1.328 1.729 2.093 2.539 2.861 3.883
20 0.127 0.687 1.064 1.325 1.725 2.086 2.528 2.845 3.85
21 0.127 0.686 1.063 1.323 1.721 2.08 2.518 2.831 3.819
22 0.127 0.686 1.061 1.321 1.717 2.074 2.508 2.819 3.792
23 0.127 0.685 1.06 1.319 1.714 2.069 2.5 2.807 3.767
24 0.127 0.685 1.059 1.318 1.711 2.064 2.492 2.797 3.745
25 0.127 0.684 1.058 1.316 1.708 2.06 2.485 2.787 3.725
26 0.127 0.684 1.058 1.315 1.706 2.056 2.479 2.779 3.707
27 0.137 0.684 1.057 1.314 1.703 2.052 2.473 2.771 3.69
28 0.127 0.683 1.056 1.313 1.701 2.048 2.467 2.763 3.674
29 0.127 0.683 1.055 1.311 1.699 2.045 2.462 2.756 3.649
30 0.127 0.683 1.055 1.31 1.697 2.042 2.457 2.75 3.656
40 0.126 0.681 1.05 1.303 1.684 2.021 2.423 2.704 3.551
80 0.126 0.679 1.046 1.296 1.671 2 2.39 2.66 3.46
120 0.126 0.677 1.041 1.289 1.658 1.98 2.358 2.617 3.373
Infini 0.126 0.674 1.036 1.282 1.645 1.96 2.326 2.576 3.291
APPENDIX E
RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN
(RPP)
Sekolah : SMP Somba Opu
Mata Pelajaran : Bahasa Inggris
Kelas : VII
Mata Pelajaran : Descriptive text
Alokasi Waktu : 6 × 30 menit (3 pertemuan)
Kompetensi Inti
KI.1 dan KI.2 :
Pembelajaran Sikap Spiritual dan Sikap Sosial dilaksanakan secara tidak
langsung (indirect teaching) melalui keteladanan, terkait jujur, tanggungjawab,
disiplin, dan santun melalui proses pembelajaran Pengetahuan dan Keterampilan.
Selanjutnya guru melalukan penilaian sikap tersebut sepanjang proses pembelajaran
berlangsung, dan berfungsi sebagai pertimbangan guru dalam mengembangkan
karakter peserta didik lebih lanjut.
KI.3 :
Memahami, menerapkan, dan menganalisis pengetahuan faktual, konseptual,
prosedural dan metakognitif berdasarkan rasa ingintahunya tentang ilmu
pengetahuan, teknologi, seni, budaya, dan humaniora dengan wawasan
kemanusiaan, kebangsaan, kenegaraan, dan peradaban terkait penyebab fenomena
dan kejadian, serta menerapkan pengetahuan prosedural pada bidang kajian yang
spesifik sesuai dengan bakat dan minatnya untuk memecahkan masalah.
KI.4 :
Mengolah, menalar, menyaji, dan mencipta dalam ranah konkret dan ranah
abstrak terkait dengan pengembangan dari yang dipelajarinya di sekolah secara
mandiri serta efektif dan kreatif, dan mampu menggunakan metoda sesuai kaidah
keilmuan.
B. Kompetensi Dasar dan Indikator
Kompetensi Dasar Indikator
3.8 Membedakan fungsi sosial,
struktur teks dan unsur kebahasaan
beberapa teks descriptive secara
lisan dan tulis terkait informasi
tentang benda-benda yang ada
disekitarnya sesuai dengan konteks
penggunaannya.
3.8.1 Menemukan fungsi sosial, struktur
teks dan unsur kebahasaan beberapa teks
descriptive secara lisan dan tulis terkait
informasi tentang benda-benda yang ada
disekitarnya sesuai dengan konteks
penggunaannya.
3.8.2 Mengidentifikasifungsi sosial,
struktur teks dan unsur kebahasaan
beberapa teks descriptive lisan dan tulis
terkait informasi tentang benda-benda yang
ada disekitarnya sesuai dengan konteks
penggunaannya.
3.8.3 Membedakanfungsi sosial, struktur
teks dan unsur kebahasaan beberapa teks
descripsi lisan dan tulis terkait informasi
tentang benda-benda yang ada disekitarnya
sesuai dengan konteks penggunaannya.
4. 8 Teks descriptive
4.8.1 Menangkap makna secara
konstekstual terkait fungsi sosial,
struktur teks dan unsur kebahasaan
teks descriptive secara lisan dan
4.8.1.1 Menyimpulkan informasi secara
konstekstual terkait fungsi sosial, struktur
teks dan unsur kebahasaan teks descriptive
secara lisan dan tulis terkait informasi
tentang benda-benda yang ada disekitarnya
tulis, terkait informasi tentang
benda-benda yang ada disekitarnya
sesuai dengan konteks
penggunaannya.
sesuai dengan konteks penggunaannya.
4.8.2 Menyusun teks descriptive
lisan dan tulis, terkait informasi
tentang benda-benda yang ada
disekitarnya sesuai dengan konteks
penggunaannya.dengan
memperhatikan fungsi social,
struktur teks, dan unsur kebahasaan
secara benar dan sesuai konteks.
4.8.2.1 Menulis teks descriptive lisan dan
tulis terkait terkait informasi tentang
benda-benda yang ada disekitarnya sesuai
dengan konteks penggunaannya.
4.8.2.2 Menyusun teks descriptive lisan
dan tulis, terkait informasi tentang benda-
benda yang ada disekitarnya sesuai dengan
konteks penggunaannya dengan
memperhatikan fungsi social, struktur teks,
dan unsur kebahasaan secara benar dan
sesuai konteks.
C. Materi Pembelajaran
Fungsi sosial
Menjelaskan, Mencontohkan, Menerapkan teks descriptive terkait informasi
tentang benda-benda yang ada disekitarnya sesuai dengan konteks
penggunaannya.
Struktur teks
Struktur teks report mencakup
1. Informasi umum
2. Informasi khusus
Unsur kebahasaan
1. Kata dan Bahasa yang dapat dipahami.
2. Penggunaan tenses yang tepat.
D. Tujuan Pembelajaran
1. Siswa dapat menyebutkan terkait informasi tentang benda-benda yang
ada disekitarnya yang didapat dari teks
2. Siswa dapat menemukan beberapa kosa kata baru di dalam teks
3. Siswa dapat menyebutkan arti dari kosa kata baru yang didapat dari
teks
4. Siswa dapat memahami keseluruhan isi teks
E. Metode Pembelajaran
Look and Say
F. Media/alat/bahan/sumber belajar :
Teks descriptive, spidol, flashcard
G. Kegiatan Pembelajaran
Pertemuan Ke- 1
Pendahuluan (5 menit)
1. Menyiapkan peserta didik untuk mengikuti proses pembelajaran
seperti berdoa, absensi, menyiapkan buku pelajaran.
2. Memotivasi peserta didik dengan cara melakukan ice breaking untuk
menyemangati kelas
3. Menjelaskan tujuan pembelajaran atau kegiatan yang akan siswa
lakukan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut.
Kegiatan Inti (50 menit)
a) Kegiatan Literasi
Guru memberikan teks deskripsi pendek kepada peserta didik dan
mengarahkan pesertadidik untuk membaca dan memahami isi dari
teks tersebut.
b) Critical thinking
Guru memberikan kesempatan untuk mengidentifikasi sebanyak
mungkin kata yang sulit menurut peserta didik.
c) Collaboration
Setelah membaca dan mengidentifikasi kata yang sulit pada teks
deskripsi, peserta didik bersama teman sebangku diarahkan untuk
mengelompokkan kata yang sulit dan kata yang mudah dan
menuliskannya di buku tulis masing-masing.
d) Communication
Peserta didik membacakan hasil diskusi mereka.
Guru menuliskan di papan tulis yang dibacakan oleh peserta didik.
Guru menuliskan arti dari setiap kata yang telah di sebutkan oleh
peserta didik, sambil sesekali bertanya apakah ada diantara peserta
didik yang mengetahui arti dari kata tersebut.
Guru memperlihatkan gambar (flashcard) dari kata yang telah
dituliskan di papan tulis (guru sebelumnya sudah menyiapkan
gambar dari setiap kata pada teks yang mungkin tidak diketahui
oleh peserta didik).
Peserta didik membaca dengan lantang setiap kata beserta artinya
sambil meliahat gambar yang dipegan oleh guru.
Peseta didik diarahan untuk menuliskan dan mempelajari di rumah
masing-masing semua kata beserta artinya yang telah didiskusikan
bersama.
e) Creativity
Guru dan peserta didik membuat kesimpulan tentang hal-hal yang
telah dipelajari terkait kata benda yang ada disekitarnya beserta
artinya yang telah dipresentasikan. Peserta didik kemudian diberi
kesempatan untuk menanyakan kembali hal-hal yang belum
dipahami
Kegiatan Penutup (5 menit)
1. Peserta didik membuat rangkuman/simpulan pelajaran tentang point-
point penting yang muncul dalam kegiatan pembelajaran yang baru
dilakukan.
2. Guru membuat rangkuman/simpulan pelajaran tentang point-point
penting yang muncul dalam kegiatan pembelajaran yang baru
dilakukan.
Pertemuan Ke- 2
Pendahuluan (5 menit)
1. Menyiapkan peserta didik untuk mengikuti proses pembelajaran
seperti berdoa, absensi, menyiapkan buku pelajaran.
2. Memotivasi peserta didik dengan cara melakukan ice breaking untuk
menyemangati kelas
3. Menjelaskan tujuan pembelajaran atau kegiatan yang akan siswa
lakukan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut.
Kegiatan Inti (50 menit)
a) Kegiatan Literasi
Guru memperlihatkan gambar benda-benda pada teks yang
diberikan pada pertemuan sebelumnya, dan menuliskan nama
benda benda tersebut pada papan tulis.
b) Critical thinking
Guru memberikan kesempatan pada peserta didik untuk menebak
nama benda pada gambar yang diperlihatkan.
c) Collaboration
Setelah mengamati dan menebak nama-nama benda yang
diperlihatkan, peserta didik secara berpasangan menghafal nama-
nama benda beserta artinya sesuai gambar pada flashcard yang
diperlihatkan oleh guru.
d) Communication
Guru mengarahkan siswa agar fokus kepada gambar di flashcard
yang diperlihatkan oleh guru sekali lagi.
Guru meminta salah satu siswa agar maju ke depan untuk memulai
permainan.
Guru membagi siswa yang lain agar berpasangan.
Guru menjelaskan peraturan dan langkah-langkah dari permainan
serta memberikan contoh jika diperlukan.
Guru meminta siswa di depan untuk berbalik ke papan tulis dan
menutup mata.
Guru memerlihatkan salah satu gambar benda ke kelas dan
memberikan waktu kepada siswa untuk berdiskusi dengan
pasangan mereka selama 25 detik.
Guru menutup gambar dan meminta siswa di depan untuk
menghadap ke kelas.
Guru meminta setiap pasangan untuk memberikan kata kunci
mereka.
Guru meminta siswa di depan untuk menebak
Kegiatan Penutup (5 menit)
Peserta didik membuat rangkuman/simpulan pelajaran tentang point-
point penting yang muncul dalam kegiatan pembelajaran yang baru
dilakukan.
Guru membuat rangkuman/simpulan pelajaran tentang point-point
penting yang muncul dalam kegiatan pembelajaran yang baru
dilakukan.
Pertemuan Ke- 3
Pendahuluan (5 menit)
1. Menyiapkan peserta didik untuk mengikuti proses pembelajaran
seperti berdoa, absensi, menyiapkan buku pelajaran.
2. Memotivasi peserta didik dengan cara melakukan ice breaking untuk
menyemangati kelas
3. Menjelaskan tujuan pembelajaran atau kegiatan yang akan siswa
lakukan untuk mencapai tujuan tersebut.
Kegiatan Inti (50 menit)
a) Kegiatan Literasi
Guru memasang flashcards di papan tulis agar peserta didik dapat
melihat, mengamati, membaca dan mengingat gambar serta kata
yang terdapat pada flashcards tersebut.
b) Critical thinking
Guru memberikan kesempatan untuk mengidentifikasi sebanyak
mungkin kata dan gambar pada flashcards yang belum dipahami.
c) Collaboration
Setelah mengamati kata dan gambar pada flashcards, guru
memberikan games pada peserta didik. Dimana peserta didik akan
dibagi ke dalam beberapa kelompok, tiap kelompok akan berisi 3-4
orang.
Dimana seorang dari tiap kelompok akan diberikan kartu berisi
sebuah kata, kemudian mereka harus menjelaskan kata tersebut.
Pemain tersebut tidak boleh berbicara, membuat gerakan, atau
simbol lainnya untuk memberitahu pemain lain.
Peserta didik hanya boleh memberi petunjuk dengan cara membuat
gambar, kemudian pemain lain berusaha menebak kata yang
dimaksud melalui gambar tersebut.
Kata yang diberikan berkaitan dengan flashcards yang sebelumnya
diperlihatkan oleh guru.
d) Communication
Peserta didik mempresentasikan kembali kata dan kalimat
menggunakan flashcard yang suudah disediakan oleh guru.
e) Creativity
Guru dan peserta didik membuat kesimpulan tentang hal-hal yang
telah dipelajari terkait kata dan kalimat yang dipresentasikan.
Peserta didik kemudian diberi kesempatan untuk menanyakan
kembali hal-hal yang belum dipahami
Kegiatan Penutup (5 menit)
Peserta didik membuat rangkuman/simpulan pelajaran tentang point-
point penting yang muncul dalam kegiatan pembelajaran yang baru
dilakukan.
Guru membuat rangkuman/simpulan pelajaran tentang point-point
penting yang muncul dalam kegiatan pembelajaran yang baru
dilakukan.
APPENDIX F
INSTRUMENT
Pre-test
A. Read the following text and answer question 1 to 5.
My is classroom is very big. There are twenty classroom
and forty chairs for students. The teacher‟s table is in front
of the classroom. The teacher sit behind the table. Behind
her is the whiteboard. Beside the whiteboard is a map of
Indonesian archipelago. Under the map, there is a bookshelf. There are two windows
in the room. Between the windows a picture of Prambanan temple. I like my
classroom very much.
1. “My classroom is very big “. Synonym of the underlined word….
a. Large c. Fat b. Great d. Clean
2. How is the writer‟s classroom ?
a. It is very big
b. It is very clean
c. It is in front of the school
d. It has forty chairs for students
3. Where does the teacher sit ?
a. In front of the classroom.
b. Behind the whiteboard.
c. Behind the table.
d. Behind the white board
4. Where is the whiteboard?
a. Behind the table.
b. Beside the teacher.
c. Behind the wall
d. Behind the teacher.
5. Does the writer like his class very much ?
a. No, it is not.
b. No, it does not.
c. Yes, she is.
d. Yes, I am
B. Reading the following text carefully and fill in the blanks using
words from the box below!
If you are thinking of_________ at a university overseas, or getting a job at an
international company when you leave school, you might have to have an________
with someone in English. If you have an interview in English, how will do you think
you will do?
People are often_________ in interview. Always use the simplest an clearest
English you know. An interviewer will be more impressed with someone who uses
simple clear English well and with_________, than with someone who uses more
complicated language with less confidence. As someone once said, „always_______
with KISS!‟. Here, „KISS‟ means „keep it short and simple‟
studying interview nervous confidence speak
speak
Post-test
A. Read the following text and answer question 1 to 5.
My Neighbor
Mr. and Mrs. Harry are my neighbors. They have two children, a son and a
daughter. Their names are Sigit and Nuri. Mr. Harry is a lecturer in a state
university in our town. Mrs. Harry is a house wife. She likes cooking many
kinds of food. She often invites me to cook together in her kitchen. Mr.
Harry‟s family has some pets. There are some birds, a cat and two rabbits. I
sometimes feed them. I like going there because they are kind and friendly.
They always show good attitude to everyone.
1. Does Harry‟s family live far from the writer‟s house ?
a. Yes, they do
b. No, they don‟t
c. Yes, it does
d. No, it doesn‟t
2. Where does Mr. Harry work ? He works in a . . .
a. University
b. school
c. kitchen
d. company
3. I sometimes feed them. Feed means . . .
a. ask food to somebody /something
b. give food to somebody/something
c. eat food with somebody
d. take food from somebody
4. She often invites me to cook together in her kitchen. The wood “me”
refers to . . .
a. the teacher
b. the writer
c. Nuri
d. Mr Harry
5. The chairs are very comfortable. We want to buy . . .
a. them
b. they
c. its
d. it
B. Reading the following text carefully and fill in the blanks using words
from the box below!
14 year computer illegally music downloaded
The Daily News
The mother of a ________ old high school student in America has just been
given a bill for $22.500.000 for the 150 songs that her child has _______ downloaded
from the internet. The law allows the _______ industry to charge people $150.000 for
each song that they have _______. A letter with the bill told the mother if all the
songs are deleted from the _______, she will only have to pay $15.000.
A short descriptive text (materi pertemuan ke- 1 dan ke- 2)
My Classroom
I learn in 7b class. It is a class with size about 20 m2 with white paint that covered all
the walls. In my classroom there are about 35 tables and chairs arranged well. In front
of tables and chairs, there is a large Whiteboards. Above the whiteboard, there is pair
of photos of President of republic Indonesia and Pancasila symbol. Besides the
photos of president, there are also so many heroes‟ pictures who stuck to the wall of
my classroom. At the corner of my classroom, there is a cabinet used to store
janitorial tools such as brooms, feather duster, and others. Right next to the cabinet,
there is a teacher‟s desk which is covered with blue tablecloth. On the teacher‟s desk,
there is a beautiful flower vase and a pile of books that ordered well.
APPENDIX G
FLASHCARDS
SON
(ANAK LAKI-LAKI)
DAUGHTER
(ANAK PEREMPUAN)
LECTURER
(DOSEN)
DAUGHTER
(ANAK PEREMPUAN)
LAW
(HUKUM)
TOWN
(KOTA)
NEIGHBOR
(TETANGGA)
A LETTER
(SURAT)
FEED
(MEMBERI MAKAN)
TWO CHILDRENS
(DUA ANAK)
TWO RABBITS
(DUA KELINCI)
PILE OF BOOKS
(TUMPUKAN BUKU)
FLOWER VASE
(POT BUNGA)
BROOMS
(SAPU)
TEACHERS` TABLE
(MEJA GURU)
TABLECLOTH
(TAPLAK MEJA)
FEATHER DUSTER
(PEMBERSIH DEBU)
CABINET
(LEMARI)
WHITEBOARD
(PAPAN TULIS PUTIH)
WALLS
(TEMBOK)
TABLES AND CHAIRS
(MEJA DAN KURSI)
APPENDIX G
DOCUMENTATION
A. Pre-test
WHITE PAINT
(CAT PUTIH)
B. Treatment
C. Post-test
CURRICULUM VITAE
NILAM CAHYA was born on April 14, 1998 in Makassar. she is the first and
the only child from the marriage partner Drs. Sultan and Warda. She started her
education as an elementary school at SD INPRES Tello Baru I in 2004 and
graduated in 2010. In the same year she registered as a student at SMPN 23
Makassar and graduated in 2013. She continued her education in senior high
school at MAN 2 Makassar and graduated in 2016. Furthermore, the researcher
continued her study at English Department of Muhammadiyah University of
Makassar.
And at the end of her study, she could finish her thesis entitle “The Use of
Look Say Method to Improve Students Reading Skill at the Eighth Grade”
The author,Ummi Khaerati Syam, S.Pd., M.Pd. from English Education Department of Teacher
Training and Education Faculty at Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.
The author,Eka Prabawati Rum, S.Pd., M.Pd. from English Education Department of Teacher
Training and Education Faculty at Universitas Muhammadiyah Makassar.