ISSUE 232 WHICH ONE OF YOU NUTS HAS GOT ANY GUTS

RED FAC GUERRILLA: IT’S HAMMER TIME

WOLFENSTEIN: NAZI ZOMBIES AHOY

Issue 232 Nov 2009 £5.99 Outside UK & ROI £6.49

FREE DVD!67 MUST-PLAY GAMES

GET READY FOR WIN 7 PREPARE YOUR RIG FOR THE NEW OS PAGE 56

“LEGO UNIVERSE IS EVERYTHING SPORE SHOULD HAVE BEEN!”

Henry builds a brighter tomorrow

Bargain cards: silky smooth performance for peanuts

W

WW

.PCFOR

MAT.CO

.UK

ISSUE 232

NO

V 2009

THERE’S MORE…Gaming keyboards mashedMake a remote serverAre you addicted to games?Get fi t with your PC

Hit 4.2GHz on Intel’s new coreOverclock Core i5

Isle of Conquest

Master

POLYGONTASTIC

EVEN MORE… INTEL CORE i5 & i7GIGABYTE P55-UD3BENQ JOYBEE JP1MESH CUTEASUS MAXIMUS III02 JOGGLER

WH

ICH O

NE O

F YO

U N

UTS H

AS G

OT A

NY

GU

TS

PCF232.cover 1 8/9/09 4:03:6 pm

108 November 2009

Illus

trat

ion:

Mag

icto

rch

PCF232.feature3 108 7/9/09 6:02:1 pm

November 2009 109

PCF232.feature3 109 7/9/09 6:02:4 pm

ave you ever succumbed to temptation and had “just one more go?” Do you fi nd yourself playing games and then later realising you had other things you should have been doing? Like sleeping,

to take an example entirely at random… Almost all gamers will have tasted that peculiar guilty feeling of having played one hour or level too many at some point. The question is: when does it become a problem? Is it the point when you’ve not done the dishes for a week? When you’ve skipped the pub to stay in front of your screen? Or when you die?

And there have been deaths. Last year, a Chinese gamer reportedly died of heart failure after fi fteen days of heavy gaming in a cybercafe, while a Starcraft player in Korea apparently died after a non-stop fi fty hour session. These individuals are part of a growing number of people who have managed to play themselves to death.

And unfortunately, deaths mean sensationalism. Tabloid headlines gorge themselves on this kind of stuff. These tragic events are just a handful of instances among millions, perhaps billions, of gaming lives, but they’re easily exploded out of all proportion by the hype-seeking missile of cheap journalism. Indeed, the menace of gaming is a spectre whose true shape is unclear. We really don’t know much about long-term gaming, or what it

might be doing to us. And we’d argue it’s this lack of clarity that’s actually our biggest enemy; ignorance about habitual gaming is now a major issue for gamers, and for society at large.

On the one hand, we’re seeing reputable British newspapers unquestioningly – and unhelpfully – reporting that playing games is akin to being on drugs. On the other hand, we’re seeing very little being done to fi gure out what games mean for human lives. But that can’t last forever – sorting the facts from the fi ction, the lies and hysteria from the genuine problems is going to be a crucial task in a world where gaming is fast becoming the dominant leisure pastime.

We should make two things clear at this point. Firstly, there is no professional agreement on the status or nature of videogame addiction. Contradictory studies and reports have been published and there has not yet been an accepted offi cial diagnosis of the condition in the UK or North America. What nearly all medical professionals do agree on, though, is that there has not yet been suitable research into the subject.

Secondly, excessive use of videogames is hurting people. There are many self-proclaimed addicts, and plenty of incidents of excessive gaming where people’s relationships, working lives and health have suffered. Some, albeit it astoundingly rarely, have even died. So, it’s undeniable that there are problems related to over-use of games. But whether this constitutes addiction, in the sense that a heroin addict or alcoholic is addicted, is where the problem lies for ongoing research.

Thus what we are faced with is a subject that has not been suitably researched in a climate of fear about addiction. Our jumpy response to that

A Korean Starcraft player reportedly died after playing for 50 hours without a break

“We’re seeing reports that

gaming is akin to being

a drug user”

The truth about game addiction

110 November 2009

PCF232.feature3 110 7/9/09 6:02:11 pm

word can cause us to attribute addiction to almost any habitual activity.

So, let’s take a look at what we do know. Over the following pages, we’ll talk to an expert in the subject of habitual gaming, examine what addiction might really mean in the context of gaming and look at what the potential physical effects of prolonged exposure to videogames could be.

THE WRONG QUESTIONS The idea of videogame addiction has been misshapen by the way that studies trying to identify and understand the problem of obsessive videogame use have been undertaken. Many psychology studies are simply phone or internet interviews, and they often try to apply criteria for gambling addiction – a related, and yet clearly very different problem – to gamers. These studies also rely on impersonal surveys of large numbers of randomly selected gamers, rather than talking to individuals – a risky tactic that can skew results by asking the wrong questions.

To understand this problem better, we talked to Neils Clark, the author of the recently published Game Addiction: The Experience and the Effects, and questioned him about the lack of useful data. “There are a lot of problems with the numbers that are being thrown out there,” says Clark, “huge problems with how we are getting data on game use and gaming behaviour. The questions that researchers ask don’t necessarily consider how we play these games. One of the fl ags for addiction was the question: ‘do you think about the game when you are not playing?’, which of course you do if it’s an involving MMO. Of course you’ll be preoccupied if there’s some guild drama going on or something. A phone survey is probably going to throw up results that are not useful in making a diagnosis. They confl ate normal play activities with addiction and that’s going to produce gibberish.”

And gibberish can be dangerous. Talk of videogame addiction frightens people, especially when gaming is so widespread, and it can even cause gamers to doubt themselves when they really don’t have a problem at all.

Dr Richard Wood at Nottingham Trent University points out that the socially propagated idea of videogame addiction is causing problems all on its own. In his paper, The Myth of Video Game “Addiction”, he writes: “Some people are being mislabelled addicts by concerned parents, partners or others when they have no problems with their game-playing behaviour… Some people who are concerned about their own behaviour… end up labelling themselves as video game addicts.”

So, gamers are panicking and then self-applying this label, when in reality their behaviour bears few of the hallmarks of genuine addiction. See

‘What Is Addiction?’ to better understand what’s classifi ed as addictive behaviour and what’s just taking things too far occasionally.

However, there are people with expertise and solid credentials who also label themselves as having issues of problematic use. Neils Clark told us that he ended up researching the subject precisely because of his own spiral into problematic use of games. “I’ve always liked games and I did pretty poorly in college, because I was playing so much Counter-Strike,” says Clark. “I got into doing really well at the game and that was never really something that challenged my functioning too much. I would play for eight hours and be late for class, but it was never a huge problem. It wasn’t until some friends of mine got into Star Wars Galaxies in my year after college [that things got problematic]. I was living with my parents and I was just playing more and more. It got to a point when I was playing twenty hours a day. Think about what that means: you are sleeping for about an hour a day. You’re so tuned into that world, and so excited about it, that you’re thinking about it and drinking another latte, rather than doing anything else in life.”

What Clark identifi es in his book is something he has detected in his own life, which is a common escalating behaviour of gamers. It is a side-effect of the way in which we make time for playing games. We carefully prune activities out of our everyday life until we are left with large, uninterrupted blocks of time where we can be left alone with our games.

Understanding how we prune our motivations to make time available for gaming is one of the most important subjects related to habitual over-use of gaming. Clark has observed that problematic game use doesn’t tend to simply click in because of a particularly addictive game, it comes about because of a gradual shift in our lifestyle. We erode away the time we have for other activities in favour of gaming. Gamers with problems are those who have pruned their life too far and thus lose the motivation to deal with other issues, such as relationships, jobs, school, or personal hygiene. Usually, these gamers only need to take a step back to recognise these problems and redress the balance. Unlike addicts of hard drugs, for example, gamers only need to stop playing for a short while for the problems to evaporate.

Indeed, Clark was able to do precisely that and it was this experience that has allowed him to cast doubt on much of the research undertaken so far on this subject. Clark’s own unique perspective – as well as detailed research – has helped him understand when clinical and academic research has failed to take into account the other discipline’s fi ndings, or when they both failed to comprehend

WHAT IS ADDICTION?

Just because you spend a lot of time playing games doesn’t mean that you are addicted. There are a couple of criteria that defi ne true addiction and very few gamers genuinely fall foul of them. The most crucial of the lot is this: someone who continues to play games despite obvious negative consequences that directly affect their life and relationships. If your work or your relationship with the people around you is suffering because of the time you spend playing games, and you can’t manage to change your behaviour to deal with that problem, you need to seek help.

Most of the time, the problem lies with a lack of proper self-regulation on the part of the gamer. Games are a lot of fun, so we end up spending a lot of time playing them. Not being able to judge how much time has passed, or not feeling motivated to do things other than playing games are natural responses to engaging, exciting stimuli. People who are worried about how much someone is playing should understand that and try to engage with the gamer on their own level. Most psychologists would recommend that a worried parent or girlfriend should talk about the games with their children or partners, rather than reacting negatively. Understanding that the over-indulging gamer just has a problem with self-regulating the amount of time spent in a game and talking about that is likely to yield much more positive changes in behaviour than panicking and slapping on the addict label.

For more information you could try a couple of online resources, including ELSPA’s Good Gaming Guide at www.askaboutgames.com. This features lots of useful information about balancing your gaming with the rest of life. Also, for more help try Online Gamers Anonymous www.olganon.org, which seeks to help gamers give up problematic use of videogames in a twelve-step program.

Playing too much WoW? Why don’t you stop (and give me your epix)?

Delving behind the myth of an overused phrase

November 2009 111

The truth about game addiction

PCF232.feature3 111 7/9/09 6:02:14 pm

gaming as an activity undertaken by real people. His insight is into the actual experience of gaming and the way we play: the way any of us sink time into gaming. He now believes that the term addiction needs to be replaced when talking about gaming.

Another aspect of gaming that is often not considered, or not even understood, says Clark, is the way in which it is tied to social embedding. When your friends are gamers, you’re probably going to play to fi t in. When you’re involved with MMOs, where dozens of other people are going to be playing regularly and relying on you turning up to help with organised events, well, the commitment increases exponentially. People outside the game

generally won’t understand that, either, and could well see it as a sign of addiction. What it is, instead, is a new kind of social behaviour, and one that’s not well understood – responsibility to virtual relationships.

But there’s another issue here: the claims that games are chemically addictive. These claims centre around dopamine; the chemical our brains release when we’re enjoying something. Thus when games are fun, a lot of this chemical gets released, which reinforces our pleasure in the gaming process. As we produce more and more of this chemical from longer bouts of gaming, so we become used to having that wave of pleasure. If, we come to rely on gaming for that stimulus then we’ll start to experience a craving for games.

DOPE-AMINE? But there’s an even deeper issue here – anything that releases dopamine in the brain is likely to reinforce brain maps, which are the paths of neurons that build up when we repeat an activity. As you play more and more games, your brain rewires itself to become better at playing them and, more importantly, it begins to expect that you’ll play them.

To understand this idea, it’s best to look at the work of people like Norman Doidge, a psychiatrist who wrote the book The Brain That Changes Itself. The brain, says Doidge, is not a fi xed piece of hardware like a computer, but more like a muscle that can be moulded to suit a variety of different tasks by being exercised. In other words, the brain is malleable and can be radically changed through use. So profound is this malleability, or plasticity, that repetitious game-like therapies have been developed to help rewire brains. These therapies are then used to assist people with learning diffi culties and even ameliorate some of the symptoms of conditions like autism. It’s a radical frontier for neurology.

STAYING HEALTHY

Sitting down to play videogames for extended periods of time might be worse for you than you think. Truly long-term gaming, where you are sedentary for dozens of hours, can cause deep-vein thrombosis. This is where a blood clot builds up in a major blood vessel, blocking the fl ow of blood to vital areas of the body, which can – in extreme cases – kill you. No, we’re not joking: you need to get up away from the computer every few hours, walk around and stretch. If you don’t do that, you’re putting your health at signifi cant risk. Chiropractors recommend taking a break to stretch every forty-fi ve minutes to an hour.

You also need to eat regularly. Obsessive gamers are prone to putting meals off, skipping meals, or opting for quick and easy options. Most of the time that’s fi ne, but you need to make sure you’re getting at least

some decent nutrition. If you’re going to spend extended periods of your week playing games, eat some fruit. This will give you vital vitamins, provide fi bre to keep your bowel moving and could make you better at your chosen game. After all, fresh fruit and vegetables are the best power-food you can hope to eat. Remember that thing about an apple a day? Well, add a banana in and you’re just about there.

Posture is also important: having a good desk and chair that help you sit upright is essential to reducing the potential of damaging your back. It’ll also avoid RSI in your wrists and shoulders. So, don’t think you can make do with a cheap folding chair and a repurposed table: if you’re going to spend most of your time at a desk, you need to spend money on good furniture. In fact, that’s pretty good advice for life: go and buy a decent bed while you’re at it.

It’s not just MMOs that are accused of encouraging excessive behaviour...

Keep your body happy while gaming

“Game-like therapies

have been invented to

rewire abnormal

brains”

The truth about game addiction

112 November 2009

PCF232.feature3 112 7/9/09 6:02:19 pm

Of course, if game systems can be used clinically to reshape brains, we have to wonder what excessive use of games for entertainment might be doing to our grey matter. Clark, who quotes Doidge in his own work, observes that “the thing about brain plasticity is that the connections in our brain are competitive, so learning something really well in a game – what is that competitive with? There are game therapies that we could champion, but games could also promote bad learning.”

GAMES AS TEACHERS This raises a fundamental issue for game design: could games with repetitious elements be teaching our brains bad behaviours? Perhaps. A number of people – most notably indie game designer Jonathan Blow – have claimed that the reward structure of games such as World Of Warcraft lack positive rewards for learning or puzzle solving, instead simply giving us more numbers as we get through higher levels.

But it’s arguable that this isn’t bad until it becomes tied to excessive use. What Doidge’s book about brain plasticity demonstrates is that almost any complex activity – such as learning to play a complex videogame like WoW – counts as vital exercise for the brain. When the brain is forced to master a new and radically different ability, the effects can be startling. People in their eighties rapidly regain mental agility when forced to learn a new language, which can see their mental age roll back by twenty years. This is all thanks to the way the brain develops new connections to cope with this kind of complex mental activity and the same could well be true of videogames.

However, this only happens the fi rst time something is learned by rote. Continue to reinforce the brain map over and over, and, well, you won’t see any further improvement. And this is where common sense prevails: games can be benefi cial, as long as they’re balanced out with other things in your life. Don’t sit and play the same game for months on end and then expect to get a bigger brain: go and fi nd antidotes to gaming, and make the complex mental activity of gaming part of a rich life. Indeed, the skills you get from gaming can even be put to use elsewhere in life. Famed New York surgeon Dr James Rosser, one of the pioneers of keyhole surgery, insists that his trainees play four hours of games like Super Monkey Ball every day. This kind of hardcore gaming is a key part of his Top Gun-esque academy for micro-surgery trainees. “You have to be a Nintendo surgeon,” Rosser told Wired magazine, as he explained how gaming skills can extend into real life value.

Clark agrees on this point: “All that time I spent playing games, I’ve been able to railroad that into doing other things. So when I was working on a

Masters degree, the time was suddenly there. I started working on a thesis about addiction and I was putting the time I’d spent playing games into studying time. Gamers come up with all these strategies for large uninterrupted slots of time that they can spend on gaming, and that transitioned really well into being able to spend time researching.” This is not something that can be said of chemical addiction. There is no comparison between our dopamine rewards and the hard chemical dependency of drugs. The assertion that gaming is like being on drugs is therefore false, and does nothing to help us understand the true nature of problematic game use.

For Clark, gaming is neither good nor bad, but simply new, unexplored and often misunderstood. What’s important is that we keep things in perspective. Headlines that decry the number of addicted World Of Warcraft players are not helpful – in fact, they’re based on such a fl imsy defi nition of addiction as to be little more than scaremongering. As Clark points out: “The truth is that to diagnose a gaming addiction, you need to have a clinician talking to that gamer on a one-to-one basis.”

And even that clinician will have a lot to learn before he can make an informed judgement about the subject. Gamers are a relatively new breed of people and we have to examine how they think and act if we’re to understand the values and issues in how they spend their time.

“I think there is potential out there for gamers,” says Clark. “There’s something to be said for the way we think, and the way we game, that can defi ne our lives. It just depends whether gaming leads us to do awesome things, or to waste time.”

Which of those is true of you? Well, that’s something you can defi nitely decide for yourself. ¤

is no comparison between our dopamine

dependency of drugs. The assertion that gaming is like being on drugs is therefore

such a fl imsy defi nition of addiction as to

“I think there is potential out there for

way we game, that can defi ne our lives. It just depends whether gaming leads us to

Further Reading

If you want to know more about game addiction then the best thing to check out is Neils Clark’s book, Game Addiction: The Experience and the Effects, which you can fi nd more about at neilsclark.blogspot.com. Neils looks at the current state of research into the topic, as well as writing up detailed anecdotal reports of experiences with problematic game use.

He’s not alone, however, because there’s a bunch of books on the subject of habitual gaming out there. One of the most popular, and interesting, is the excitingly titled Grand Theft Childhood, which is far more reasonable than it might sound. The authors have become some of the best mediators in the debate over the social impact of gaming, offering sensible conclusions on how much gaming is too much, and whether violent games are really having a negative effect on our lives.

For more detailed academic research on heavy gaming use, it’s worth taking a look at the website of Dr Jerald Bloch (www.jeraldjblock.medem.com) who has done some of the most comprehensive research into the negative side-effects of computer use, particularly the impact of gaming and gambling on the long-term user. Bloch’s paper Pathological Computer Gaming makes for some especially vivid reading.

Oh, and for an antithesis about why gaming is good for you, it might be worth picking up a copy of my book, This Gaming Life, which is out in paperback next month [nice subtle plug there - Ed].

Exactly like brain surgery... but with less monkeys... and indeed balls...

The alternative side to addiction research

November 2009 113

The truth about game addiction

PCF232.feature3 113 7/9/09 6:02:22 pm