The Tree That Bares Fruit

8/8/2019 The Tree That Bares Fruit

1/8

The Tree That Bares Fruit But Has No Leaves ToAdorn A Civic Crown Of Universal Fame & Glory

THE FOUNDATION OF A SOCIOECONOMIC PATRIOT

The first development of the syncretic and mixed policy, is that form of government which is called the Patriarchal or Paternal. The power ofpatriarchs has in all ages been accounted higher, wider, and more absolute than that of any of the emperors, kings, aristocrats, or democrats thatsubsequently arose. This aboriginal and supreme form of government, entitled the patriarchal, has been lauded as the earliest and best, by Philo,Plutarch, Selden, Bossuet, Filmer, Michaelis, Pastoret, and most of the commentators on the political history of the Jews. The patriarchs, and, as

they were subsequently called the Judges, of the Jewish nation, were in fact theocratic legislators: they combined an absolute ecclesiastical andcivil power, universal and indefeasible. Sir Robert Filmer has evinced, beyond contradiction, the priority and superiority of the patriarchal power. Hehas shewn that the beautiful principle of paternal government and hereditary succession is the natural and proper foundation of humangovernment. In this respect Gerson, Bossuet, Du Pin, and other Catholic writers are perfectly right. When they entitle the pope a patriarch, theyacknowledge that so far as precedence of rank is concerned, he stands as much above all emperors and kings, as they stand above allarchbishops and bishops. The patriarchal power of the pope should not, however, extend beyond his own dominions.

Emperors and kings should be supreme within their own territories in ecclesiastieal as well as civil matters; for they ought to be as much defendersof the universal faith of their subjects, as they are of their universal rights. The patriarchal theory, which shews us that we must trace the true originof monarchical and aristocratic power to the paternal principle of hereditary succession, is of the greatest value. By Filmers doctrine, we considerour princes and nobles as the personal representatives of the oldest families; and as such entitled to the same deference and respect as attach topriority of birth and seniority of age, in all national clans and private families. The able politician Heeren has recently shewn that the theory whichmakes all government merely a matter of popular compact and election, though supported by Locke and his followers, is fraught with all the perilsof Rousseaus social compact, and tends to produce republicanism and revolution. These remarks would indicate the truth of what the admirableSelden observes with reference to the Hebrew commonwealth, namely, that when the government was changed from the patriarchal into themonarchical, there was in fact a fall from a higher order of government into a lower. It is no wonder, therefore, that the Deity was incensed against

the people of Israel for asking for a king, instead of a patriarchal successor to Samuel; for, by so doing, they throw their political system into aninferior condition.

Yet, royal, imperial, and monarchical government is next to the patriarchal, wonderfully sacred and venerable. We find something resembling it inthe first rise and youthful spring of all ancient nations. In the Asiatic territories it has been universally cherished. And we find that kings, a series ofwise and heroic monarchs, laid the foundation of all the glories of Greece and Rome. Still, however fair, monarchy has been continually exposed tothe dangers of degeneration into despotism and tyranny. Next to the imperial or regal, is that particular form of government called the aristocratical.Inferior to the regal no doubt it is, but something infinitely better than the democratic. It still maintains something of the patriarchal dignity ofhereditary succession to family wealth and honors, which is the grand security of all states, though it has often been abused to purposes of pride,extravagance, and oppression.

The last particular form of government we shall mention, is the democratical or republican. The advantages and disadvantages of this form are soneatly summed up by Paley, we shall avail ourselves of his words. The advantages of a republic are, liberty, or exemption from needlessrestrictions; equal laws; regulations adapted to the wants and circumstances of the people, public spirit, frugality, averseness to war, theopportunities which democratic assemblies afford to men of every description, of producing their abilities and counsels to public observation, andthe exciting thereby, and calling forth to the service of the commonwealth the faculties of its best citizens. The evils of a republic are dissentions,

tumults, factions, the attempts of powerful citizens to possess themselves of the empire; the confusion, rage, and clamour, which are the inevitableconsequences of assembling multitudes, and of propounding questions of state to the discussion of the people; the delay and disclosure of publiccounsels and designs, and the imbecility of measures retarded by the necessity of obtaining the consent of numbersnd lastly, the oppression ofthe provinces which are not admitted to a participation in the legislative power.

Now Cicero, the most observant of all politicians, clearly perceived that in proportion as the catholic, syncretic system of government, whichcombined and harmonized these several particular forms, advanced, in that proportion had the state become prosperous and durable. For it is theremarkable characteristic of this syncretic government, being unionistic, universal, coalitionary, mixed, and eclectic, to blend all that is good in theparticular species, without contracting their mischiefs. Like the light of heaven, it combines all colours in a blaze of glory, which, when divided andsegregated, become faint and shadowy. Thus, according to Cicero, there can be only two principal distinctions in the kinds of governmentne isthe Catholic, Syncretic, Unionistic, coalitionary, and harmonic. The other is the sectarian, partizantic, divisionary and discordant. Cicerospreference for the first kind was strong and invincible; he saw that by a manly eclecticism, a philanthropical latitudinarianism, it combined all the

1

Economic Biases as a Means of Obtaining Wealth and Opulence through Human Concerns as Seenthrough Eyes of the Federalists & Anti-Federalists Papers Involving a Modern Global Economic

Perspective of Market Forces through Historical Thoughts, Concepts & Experiences
http://www.molaah.com/The%20Organization%20of%20an%20Army%20of%20Economic%20Principles.htmlhttp://www.molaah.com/The%20Organization%20of%20an%20Army%20of%20Economic%20Principles.htmlhttp://www.molaah.com/The%20Organization%20of%20an%20Army%20of%20Economic%20Principles.htmlhttp://www.molaah.com/The%20Organization%20of%20an%20Army%20of%20Economic%20Principles.html


2/8

separate notes of political wisdom into one grand and majestic concord; and he saw that the universal tendency of all divisionary and particulargovernments was to produce a miserable contractedness in national politics, and to embroil the state in the interminable jars of schisms and sects,parties and factions.

By the Online Library of Liberty: Treatise on the Commonwealth

Federalist 2Concerning Monetary Dangers from Foreign Force and

InfluenceTo the Current State of the Existence of All Mankind:

When the people of this planet reflect that they are now called upon to decide the final question of their actionstowards one another, which, in its consequences, must prove one of the most important that has ever engaged theirattention, the propriety of their taking a very comprehensive, as well as a very serious, view of it, will be evident.

Nothing is more certain than the indispensable necessity of a universal perspective of a global monetary existence,and it is equally undeniable, that whenever and however it is instituted, all mankind must eventually cede to it some ofit's unnatural rights of human indifference in order to vest it with requisite powers of emotional and economicfreedoms. It is well worthy of consideration therefore, whether it would conduce more to the interest of Mankind that itshould, to all general purposes, become united, under a Universal Law of Observation that Exists within a GlobalRepublic of Economic Thought, or that they should divide themselves into separate emotional or economicconfederacies, and give to the head of each the elusion of the same kind of powers from which they are advised hasnot or does not currently exists within Perspectives of a Global Economy.

It has until lately been a received and uncontradicted opinion that the prosperity of all mankind depended on it'scontinuing firmly united, and the wishes, prayers, and efforts of the best and wisest citizens on earth have beenconstantly directed to that object. But academics might appear, who will insist that this opinion is erroneous, and thatinstead of looking for safety and happiness in a global economic union of abstract fiduciary principalities, we ought toseek it in a division of financial or emotional states which are distinct conflicting reactionary confederacies orbehavioral sovereignties of a pre-existing invisible global republic of free market forces. However extraordinary thisnew doctrine may appear, it nevertheless will have its advocates; and certain characters who might become muchopposed to it formerly, will be at present times of various numbers. Whatever may be the arguments or inducementswhich might wrought this change in the sentiments and declarations of the opinionated, it certainly would not be wisein the peoples of this planet at large to adopt these new academic tenets without being fully convinced that they arefounded in truth and sound policy.

It has often given me as a human being pleasure to observe that aspect of humanity that was not composed of

detached and distant emotional territories, but that of one connected, fertile, and filled with widespreading forms ofexistence that is proportioned the causes and peoples of liberty and economic freedoms. Providence has in aparticular manner blessed all mankind with a variety of soils and methods of productions, and watered it withinnumerable streams of knowledge and potential, for the delight and accommodation of its inhabitants at the behest ofHigher or Universal Powers. A succession of navigable academic waters forms a kind of chain around its monetaryborders, as if to bind it together; while the most noble ecclesiastical rivers in the world, running at convenientdistances, presents them with the most technical highways known to modern man for the easy communication offriendly aids, and the mutual transportation and exchange of their various commodities on a global scale at personal

2
http://federali.st/2http://federali.st/2#p1http://federali.st/2#p2http://federali.st/2#p3http://federali.st/2http://federali.st/2#p1http://federali.st/2#p2http://federali.st/2#p3


3/8

levels.

With equal pleasure I have taken notice that Providence has been pleased to finally give this planet, as promisedthroughout human history, one connected global economic perspective to a united peoples on eartha peopledescended from the same ancestors, speaking the same language, professing the same religion, attached to thesame principles of government, very similar in their manners and customs, and who, by their joint counsels, arms, and

efforts, fighting side by side throughout long and bloody wars, have nobly established through trial and error, trials andtribulations general liberties and independence from global free market uncertainties.

I may well live long enough in secret to witness this planet and it's inhabitants become made for each other, and itappears as if it was the design of Providence, that an inheritance so proper and convenient for a band of brethren,united to each other by the strongest ties, should never be split into a number of unsocial, jealous, and alien economicbehavioral sovereignties.

Similarsentiments have hitherto prevailed among all orders and denominations of men amongst us on this planet atthis point in human history. To all general purposes we have uniformly been one people each individual citizeneverywhere either pursuing or enjoying the same natural rights, privileges, and protections afforded any and allcognitive beings created equal in the presence of a Universal GOD. As nations of families we have made peace andwar; as nations of families we have attempted to vanquish what we thought from time-to-time were our commonenemies; as a nations of families we have formed alliances, and made treaties, and entered into various compactsand conventions with what we were taught as those who were existing in foreign academic states or conflictingmonetary objectives.

A strong sense of the values and blessings of a united global economic perspective shall induced the peoples of thisplanet, at very early periods within the going-ons of their daily activities, to institute a Universal Law of Observationthat Exist within a Global Republic of Economic Thought, and to preserve or perpetuate it as well. It shall transform allMankind as evidenced throughout human history, into forming it almost as soon as it's internal economic forcesachieves various political existences; nay, at times when the habitations of some peoples were in monetary flames,when many a citizen on this planet were bleeding from economic bondage, and when the progress of emotionalhostility and fiduciary desolation left little room for those calm and mature inquiries and reflections which must everprecede the formation of a wise and well-balanced state of existence for a free people living in a global free marketsociety. It is not to be wondered at, that traditional market forces instituted in times so inauspicious, should onexperiment be found greatly deficient and inadequate to the purposes that they were intended to answer by the mere

fact of the existence of their design within historic academia.

Throughout human history intelligent peoples on Earth perceived and regretted these socioeconomic defects. Stillcontinuing no less attached to various unions than enamored of economic liberties, they observed the danger whichimmediately threatened the former and more remotely the latter; and being pursuaded that ample security for bothcould only be found in various national governments more wisely framed, they as with one voice, shall immediatelyconvene at this point in human history a tardy convention of universal achievements, to take that important subjectunder consideration.

This convention of universal achievements through monetary strategies and tactics most often is composed of allmen, women and children who possessed the confidence of numerous peoples across this planet, and many of whomhad become highly distinguished by their zeal to acquire socioeconomic patriotism, virtue, wisdom and eternal lifethrough the moral principals of global free market, in times which tried the minds and hearts of all men, women and

children victimized by human indifferences, undertook the arduous task. In the mild season of peace, with mindsunoccupied by other subjects, they passed many months in cool, uninterrupted, and daily consultation; and finally,without having been awed by power, or influenced by any passions except love for their themselves and others, theypresented and recommended to all mankind a plan produced by their joint and very unanimous councils.

Admit, for so is the fact, that this plan is only recommended, not imposed, yet let it be remembered that it is neitherrecommended to blindapprobation, nor to blind reprobation; but to that sedate and candid consideration which themagnitude and importance of the subject demand, and which it certainly ought to receive. But this (as was remarkedin the foregoing areas of this newsletter) is more to be wished than expected, that it may be so considered andexamined. Experience on former occasions teaches all mankind not to be too sanguine in such hopes. It is not yet

3
http://federali.st/2#p4http://federali.st/2#p5http://federali.st/2#p6http://federali.st/2#p7http://federali.st/2#p8http://federali.st/2#p9http://federali.st/2#p10http://federali.st/2#p4http://federali.st/2#p5http://federali.st/2#p6http://federali.st/2#p7http://federali.st/2#p8http://federali.st/2#p9http://federali.st/2#p10


4/8

forgotten that well-grounded apprehensions of imminent economic dangers in the past induced numerous peoplesacross this planet to form memorable societies. That organized bodies of men have recommended certain measuresto their constituents, and that these events have either proved or have broken the foundations of their wisdom; andyet again it will be fresh in our memories of how soon the press shall began to teem with reports and articles againstvarious conflicting measures whose methodology achieve no end results but an intentional waste of monetary orhuman resources. Enlisting many an officer of various economies and governments, who obeyed the dictates ofinvisible personal interests, as well as those of others, from a mistaken estimate of consequences, or the undueinfluence of former attachments, or whose ambition is aimed at objects which do not correspond with the public good,will be indefatigable in their efforts to pursuade the people of this planet to reject the advice of a patriotic callingfiduciary certainties. Many, indeed, might become deceived and deluded, but the great majority of all peoples withinall nations on Earth shall have been positioned to reason and decide judiciously; and happy shall they become whenthey recognize that they are existing in era reflecting that day that they did so.

They shall also considered that the adoption of a Universal Law of Observation that Exist within a Global Republic ofEconomic Thought be composed of many wise and experienced men, women and children. And that being soconvened from different parts of the world, that they may have brought with them and communicated to each other avariety of useful economic information. That, in the course of the time they passed together in inquiring into anddiscussing the true interests of all peoples and their economies, they must have acquired very accurate knowledge onthat figure head. That they were individually interested in the public liberty and prosperity all mankind, and thereforethat it was not less their inclination than their duty to recommend only such measures as, after the most mature

deliberation, they really thought prudent and advisable to the inhabitants of this planet.

These and similar considerations then might induced all peoples to rely greatly on the judgment and integrity of theeffort in and of itself; and that of the process that they took note of in their advice, notwithstanding the various arts andendeavors used to deter them from doing so. But if the peoples of all nations of families on Earth at large had reasonto confide in the meetings ahead, few of whom that shall be fully tried or generally known, still greater reason havethey now to respect the judgment and advice of the convention methods themselves, for it is well known that some ofthe most distinguished members of all societies, who have been since tried and justly approved for their economicpatriotism and abilities, and who have grown old in acquiring political information, will be members of this conventionof historical economic thought, and carried into it their accumulated knowledge and experience.

It is worthy of remark that not only the first, but every succeeding parley, as well as any late convention, will haveinvariably joined with the peoples of all nations of families in thinking that the prosperity of all mankind is depended

upon an eventual Global Economic Union. To preserve and perpetuate it was the great object of any people informing a convention of this sort, and it is also the great object of the plan which the convention has advised them toadopt. With what propriety, therefore, or for what good purposes, are attempts at this particular period made by someto depreciate the importance of a Global Economic Union? Or why is it suggested that various emotional or economicconfederacies would be better than one? I am persuaded in my own mind that the people have always thought righton this subject, and that their universal and uniform attachment to the cause of a Global Economic Union rests ongreat and weighty reasons, which I shall endeavor to develop and explain in some ensuing papers. They who promotethe idea of substituting a number of distinct confederacies in the room of the plan of the convention, seem clearly toforesee that the rejection of it would put the continuance of any Global Economic Union in the utmost jeopardy. Thatcertainly would be the case, and I sincerely wish that it may be as clearly foreseen by every good citizen of this planet,that whenever the dissolution of a Global Economic Union arrives, all mankind will have reason to exclaim, in thewords of the poet: Farewell! A long farewell to all my greatness.

Quintilian [Al-Hadid Qalam Fussilat] petitioning on behalf of all mankind in standing reference to a literary moment ofJohn Jay

First published October 28th, 2009 issues of an Independent Global Perspective.

This work is in the public domain.

Read about this paperon Wikipedia, read the previous ornext Federalist Paper, or go back to the list of them all.

4
http://federali.st/2#p11http://federali.st/2#p12http://federali.st/2#p13http://federali.st/2#p14http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Quintilian/Institutio_Oratoria/home.htmlhttp://www.molaah.com/Points%20of%20Reference/Islam%20Page.htmhttp://www.molaah.com/Points%20of%20Reference/Islam%20Page.htmhttp://www.molaah.com/Points%20of%20Reference/Islam%20Page.htmhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._2http://federali.st/1http://federali.st/3http://federali.st/http://federali.st/2#p11http://federali.st/2#p12http://federali.st/2#p13http://federali.st/2#p14http://penelope.uchicago.edu/Thayer/E/Roman/Texts/Quintilian/Institutio_Oratoria/home.htmlhttp://www.molaah.com/Points%20of%20Reference/Islam%20Page.htmhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Federalist_No._2http://federali.st/1http://federali.st/3http://federali.st/


5/8

Global Monetary Antifederalist No. 2We Have Been Told Phantoms of Racial Monetary

Leprosies and of the Existence of Quiet EconomicWars that Utilize Silent Weaponry

Do You Honestly Expect Me To Believe This Shit or What?:

The adoption of a Universal Law of Observation that Exist within a Global Republic of Economic Thought will notmeliorate our own monetary system of economic behavior at this particular point in time. I to be known as adistant voice standing in fear of economic bondage on a global scale beg leave to consider the circumstances ofthe proposed Behavioral Economic Union antecedent to the meeting of the Representative Economies of theEmbodiment of All Mankind, in General Congress of Global Market Forces, Assembled in Thought throughSystems Technology Bases. We have been told of nationalistic principles, racial phantoms filled with inherentideological dangers that have lead us into emotional and economic measures which will, in my opinion, be the

ruin of all peoples within all nations on Earth at this particular point in human history. If the existence of thosedangers can or cannot be proved to be factual, if there be no or actual apprehension of wars, if there be rumorsor even no rumors of wars, it will always place a subject such as this in a light predetermined by thesocioeconomic issues currently at hand and likely to occur within an atmosphere of monetary uncertainties, andplainly evince to the peoples of this planet that there cannot be any reason for adopting such measures which weapprehend to be ruinous and destructive to the pursuit of Martyrdom through high-tech idealism. When thecompelling nature of global market uncertainties as an unpredictable force states of the human existence that aproposal to which all regions of this planet with a general free market economy should be improved, we need onlybe reminded as human beings of the previous periods of such forms of experimental economic recovery plansfrom which the potential for monetary rebellion had brought numerous republics to the brink of destruction, assuch potential for fiduciary rebellions which were crushed by those traditional governmental perspectivesconsidered to be their citizen's democratic own, were caught of guard by various forms of political and monetaryrepresentation unfamiliar with the methodologies of a Transformation of the Universal Law of Observation which

now again lays in wait within all probability to be of such an emotional state so much academically condemnedand abhorred.

The Opinions and Status of what is or will be proposed to be that of the Augustine body of hundreds of millions ofmen, women and children, aided by the exertions of what is to be perceived as a superior state of humanexistence, may be placed in a position to permanently silence all opposition in spite of long establishedDemocratic Rule, and then through underhanded means shortly restore the perception of public tranquilitythrough immoral forms of opportunistic wealth and blue-collar expansionism. Numerous political states maybecome satisfied that these internal monetary commotions were so happily settled, and may also becomeunwilling to risk any distresses by theoretic experiments rooted in more traditional economies. Will all relevantEconomic States or Monetary Forms of Human Behavior promised equal opportunities for it's own individualparticipating citizenry willingly enter into measures consistent with a Universal Global Economic Perspective afterwitnessing the Racist and Anti-Semitic fiduciary policies inflicted upon their own populations in the past by

previous generations? Will they willingly accede to proposals consistent with the views of a newly revealedinvisible pre-existing global republic of universal economic forces and thought? No what the manner of how it isperceived or how it is received by various individuals within various nations of families on Earth? Previousgenerations have revolted at such grandiose ideas. Some economic states witnessing any form of transformationin how their monetary policies are viewed by others may stand against any formal or recommended meeting of aconvention of economic thought. They are well aware of the dangers of being vulnerable to academic revolutionsand undermining socioeconomic changes. Will it's internal methodologies consists of every effort be to used, andsuch uncommon pains taken, so as to freely and peacefully bring it about? These questions of myself would beunnecessary, if not for the current issues concerned being approved of by the people of this planet, were not so

5
http://www.molaah.com/The%20Kamasutra%20Game%20Theorems%20Page%201.htmlhttp://www.molaah.com/The%20Kamasutra%20Game%20Theorems%20Page%201.html


6/8

affected by an idea as the one currently presented.

Will all current forms of monetary existence become disposed for the reception of this project of globalsocioeconomic reformation? Are these proponents of current monetary policies even willing to amend theiropinion of revenue laws, so as to make a global economy truly operative and opportunistic? Are they satisfiedwith the way things are as they are? There was no initial complaint, that ever I heard of, from any other toward

any part of a Union of Economic Thought, except within those circumstances concerned with economicuncertainty. This being the case among ourselves, what dangers were there to be apprehended from foreigneconomic matters? It will be easily shown that dangers from that quarter were absolutely imaginary. Was not thesuccesses of the monetary policies of the European Economic Union proclaimed to be and actually open andfriendly? Unequivocally so. Despite the fact as we now suspect that She was devising new regulations ofcommerce to their own advantage while being disadvantage or hindered by inherent forms of socioeconomicbigotries which in turn lead to inflationary causes within Her own monetary ranks. Will foreign governmentsharass the citizens of other governments without due process with applications for money owed by previouspolicy holders? Is it likely that market uncertainties will cause nations of families to quarrel endlessly? Is it notreasonable to suppose that for the sake of argument that monetary traditionalists will be more desirous than everto cling, after losing prosperous republican forms of financial uncertainties, to their best emotional ally of humanignorance itself? I believe that they might take advantage of the weakness and necessities of myself and others,and made to their own terms or personal advantages that of a contemptible economic monarch. Loans orfinancing from global entities are not like loans from individual nations and private institutions of men. Nations

lend money, and grant assistance, to one another, from views of national or the personal interest of it's citizenry --and because of their residual economic policies must always be made to the ready and willing to pluck the fairestfeather out of the crown of any commonwealth viewed to the contrary of their own individual interest. This is theirusual object in aiding others. If on sparse occasions self-interests will not compel others to quarrel amongst us onpecuniary economic considerations. It then should be considered from that point of view; that a proposition shouldbe made to make their debts that of one that is leveraged jointly between private persons or institutions, ratherthen within the hidden closets and restrooms of global fiduciary policies made ready to be rejected withouthesitation at the first sign of trouble. If what ever Global Economic Body that arises respectable and wiselyconsiders these issues, and that, while we currently remained debtors in so considerable a degree of our currentglobal economic circumstances, I hope that it will be attentive to best interests of the rights of the individual nomatter where they reside on this planet.

Will global trade or commerce end up in some despicable situation? I shall say nothing of what material goods

and services that did not come in the past while existing under my own observation before the Internet. When Iwas indeed living from one paycheck to another, I witnessed that public credit across the globe had suffered then

just like now, and that public creditors have been ill used. This was owing to fiduciary fault lines within the head-quarters of Political Congresses and Financial Institutions themselves -- in not equally selling or distributingwestern economic idealism at earlier periods in human history. If requisitions of higher forms of economic thoughthave not been complied with, it must be owing to one's inabilities to gain accurate information, whose effect mightput unpopular or needless debts on the backs of accessible lands and future generations. Commutation isabhorrent to new untested monetary ideas. Speculative socioeconomic free markets are abhorrent to somepolitical or economic states. Those inconveniences have resulted from bad nationalistic economic policies ofnumerous governments. There are certain modes of governing the people which will succeed. There are otherswhich will not. The idea of a universal monetary consolidation is abhorrent to numerous peoples of this planet.How were the sentiments of the people of this planet before the meeting of the Universal Law of Observation thatExist within a Global Republic of Economic Thought? They had only one object in view. Their ideas reached no

farther than to give the general governments the promise of new technology markets, and the suggestedregulation of it's potential trade. If it is agitated in governments, in committees of the whole, then this is all thatcan be asked, or deemed possibly necessary. Until that period, all views should be extended much farther.

Monetary horrors have been greatly magnified since the rising of the economic issues at hand. We are now toldby honorable gentlemen that we shall have wars and rumors of wars, that every monetary calamity is to attendus, and that we shall be ruined and disunited forever, unless we adopt a Constitutional Perspective of GlobalMarket Forces that go far beyond all presently known nationalistic principals or economic policies. Recessionsand Depressions are to fall upon us from above, like the Goths and Vandals of old; the Monetary Abolitionists,whose flat-sided vessels of economic stimulus never came farther than it's own since of transparency, are to fill

6


7/8

the academic rivers of free markets with mighty fleets of despotism, and to attack democratic societies on theirown front lines through Quiet Warfare; the Communists of a new age are to invade us with numerous armies onour rear, in order to convert our cleared lands of political tyranny into ripe hunting- grounds of a newly formedideology of socioeconomic bondage; and an economic form Puritism, from below, (mounted on a white horse,one can only presume), will to come and destroy fertile fields political and economic freedoms, and eat up thefuture freedoms our little children! These, sir, are the mighty dangers which await us if we reject prosperouseconomic ideas with dangers which are merely imaginary and lend waste to real markets and labor capital, andwhose overall methodology is ludicrous in the extreme! Are we to be destroyed by a God of death and despairwhile admitting to ourselves that a God of life and prosperity reigns supreme during the exact same era? Whatwill democratic states make any type of war for, and how long since have they imbibed a hidden hostile spiritwithin their own ranks on the pretense of individualities? But the generality of it's message might be the real issueto attack us. Is it's potential for vagueness perceived as an attack upon the mindset of the general populous if it isviewed as violating the faith in first Societal Unions? Will it not violate their faith if they do not take into theiremotional or economic confederacies a Universal Global Economic form of Idealism? Have they not agreed, byold Confederations, that their Unions shall be perpetual, and that no alterations should take place without theconsent of a Democratic process inherent to their free market societies, and the confirmation of the legislatureswithin each & every local, state or federal form of government? I cannot think that there is such depravity inmankind as that, such a violation of public faith so flagrantly, unless as witnessed during times as should war bemade upon other human beings whose rule of self-government is hypocrisy as for their example.

Out of the current fears of a disunion of our limited global fiduciary policies, we are told that we ought to considertaking measures which we otherwise should not. That disunion is possible or that once again a monetary calamityis on the horizon. Is not a general global economic perspective and strong government necessary for the interestof all parties concerned? If ever nations had inducements to peace, the possibilities produced from the new planhas given us all that very calling once effectively scrutinized. Various families of nations anxiously look forward tothe new trade in high technology issues as proposed. How can they obtain it but by some sort of global economicunion? Can western free markets expand into new ideological territories or even become retained without somesort of union of a universal global economic perspective? If so, then how are these emotional or economic statesinclined? Are they are not likely to disunite under a continuous atmosphere of fiduciary uncertainties anyway? Willtheir perceived weaknesses prevent them from quarreling over issues that are a Quid Pro Quo to principles thatmutually undermine their efforts to prosper as individuals. Little men are seldom fond of quarreling among giants.Is there not a strong inducement to some sort of global economic union, while the proponents of marketuncertainties are on one side and the political hawks on the other? Thank Heaven, that for example we currently

have a Modern Economic Carthage of our own.... But what would I do on the present occasion to remedy theexisting defects of the present Global Economic Confederation? There are two opinions prevailing in the world --the one, that mankind can only be governed by force; the other, that they are capable of various freedoms andgood government. Under a supposition that mankind can govern themselves, I would recommend that thepresent Confederation should at least be amended so as to establish a foundation to eliminate the political and/oreconomic excuses for moral extremism. Give the inherent forces of global free markets the regulation ofcommerce. Infuse new strength and spirit into the state of good governments; for, when the component parts arestrong, it will give energy to various governments the abilities to assist free market expansionism, although it beotherwise weak.... Apportion public debts in such a manner as to throw the unpopular ones onto a burning trashheap of prosperous monetary objectives. Call only for the requisitions of new financial strategies and tacticswhose interest are aided by innovations, investments and traditional loan packaging. Keep on so till the Humancharacter can be marked with certain features devoid of human indifferences. We are yet too young an economicspecies to accurately know what we are fit for in the new plan. The continual migration of whole peoples from one

point to another on this planet, and the settlement of new technologies bases within the western frontier of freemarket globalization, are strong arguments both for and against making new experiments now in fiduciaryperspectives or government. When these things are removed, we can with greater prospect of success, devisechanges. We ought to consider whether the construction of new governments or markets be suitable to thegenius and disposition of peoples existing within an era of the Transformation of the Universal Law ofObservation as it relates to a Perspective of an Invisible Republic of Global Market Forces, as well as a variety ofother circumstances.

A SOCIOECONOMIC PATRIOT OF THE WATCHFUL EYE

7
http://opt/scribd/conversion/tmp/scratch2525/From%20Dictatorship%20To%20Democracy.pdfhttp://opt/scribd/conversion/tmp/scratch2525/From%20Dictatorship%20To%20Democracy.pdf


8/8

8

Documents

The Tree That Bares Fruit