Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Texas AgriLife Research and Extension Center at Lubbock/Halfway/Pecos - 2011
COTTON PERFORMANCE
TESTS in the Texas High Plains
and Trans Pecos Areas of Texas
2010
Technical
Report
TEXAS AgriLife RESEARCH / CRAIG NESSLER, DIRECTOR
THE TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM / COLLEGE STATION, TEXAS
Cotton Performance Tests in the Texas High Plains and Trans-Pecos Areas of Texas 2010
2/
J.K. Dever, T.A. Wheeler, R.K. Boman, D. Kerns, M. Foster, A. Cranmer, L. Schoenhals, and V. Morgan
2/
Texas AgriLife Research and Extension Center Lubbock-Halfway-Pecos
1/
Tests were conducted by Texas AgriLife Research in cooperation with Texas AgriLife Extension.
2/ Associate Professor, Professor, Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock; Area Agronomist-Cotton, Extension Entomologist, Texas AgriLife Extension, Lubbock; Research Scientist, Texas AgriLife Research, Pecos; Farm Research Manager, Texas AgriLife Research, Halfway; Research Associate, and Research Assistant, Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock, respectively.
2
TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 4 Acknowledgments ............................................................................................................................... 5 Glossary of Table Headings ......................................................................................................................... 6 Table UNIFORM COTTON VARIETY TESTS - IRRIGATED Lubbock 1 Production Information .......................................................................................... 9 2 - 2A Performance Data ............................................................................................... 10 3 Yield Summary ................................................................................................... 14 Halfway 4 Production Information ....................................................................................... 15 5 - 5A Performance Data ............................................................................................... 16 6 Yield Summary ................................................................................................... 20 Lamesa (AG-CARES) 7 Production Information ........................................................................................ 21 8 - 8A Performance Data ............................................................................................... 22 9 Yield Summary ................................................................................................... 26 UNIFORM COTTON VARIETY TESTS - DRYLAND Lubbock 10 Production Information ....................................................................................... 27 11-11A Performance Data ............................................................................................... 28 12 Yield Summary ................................................................................................... 32 Lamesa (AG-CARES) 13 Production Information ....................................................................................... 33 14-14A Performance Data ............................................................................................... 34 15 Yield Summary .................................................................................................... 38 16 Summary Over Location………….....................................................................................39 COTTON VARIETY TESTS – IRRIGATED Tulia 17 Production Information ........................................................................................ 41 18-18A Performance Data ................................................................................................ 42 Pecos 19 Production Information………………………………………………………….47 20 Performance Data……………………………………………………………….48 21 Yield Summary .................................................................................................... 50 LATE-PLANTED COTTON VARIETY TEST-IRRIGATED Lubbock 22 Production Information ........................................................................................ 51 23-23A Performance Data ............................................................................................... 52 NEW VARIETIES AND STRAINS TEST-IRRIGATED Lubbock 24 Production Information ....................................................................................... 55 25-25A Performance Data ............................................................................................... 56
3
REGIONAL BREEDERS STRAINS TEST - IRRIGATED Halfway 26 Production Information ....................................................................................... 61 27-27A Performance Data ............................................................................................... 62 VERTICILLIUM WILT VARIETY TEST - IRRIGATED Halfway 28 Production Information ....................................................................................... 67 29-29A Performance Data ............................................................................................... 68 NEMATODE VARIETY TEST - IRRIGATED Lamesa (AG-CARES) 30 Production Information ....................................................................................... 73 31-31A Performance Data ............................................................................................... 74 BACTERIAL BLIGHT SCREEN Lubbock 32 Production Information…………………………………………………………79 33 Rating…………………………………………………………………………...80
4
INTRODUCTION
Cotton performance trials were conducted during 2010 at Lubbock, Halfway, and Pecos, Texas AgriLife Research Stations. The Lamesa variety tests were planted on the AG-CARES research farm. The Lubbock tests were planted in either Amarillo or Olton soils, the Halfway test in Pullman clay loam soils, AG-CARES in Amarillo fine sandy loam, and Pecos tests were planted in Hoban silty clay loam soils.
In the South Plains and Panhandle regions of Texas during 2010, approximately
3.73 million acres of cotton was planted, of which 3.56 million acres (95.4%) were harvested. This represents a much lower than normal amount of failed or abandoned acres. Roughly, 50% of these acres were irrigated and yields across all acres averaged 982 lbs/acre in the Panhandle and 689 lbs/acre in the South Plains, resulting in 1.5 and 4.1 million bales respectively.
Conditions during early to mid-May were dry and cool, and cold soil temperatures deterred much planting. Most cotton was seeded in mid-May through mid-June. Conditions were extremely wet during June and July, especially early July. Cloudy cool conditions during early July caused significant square shed across the region. The remainder of the season was fairly dry and warm through November. The extended dry and warm fall led it a fully mature and high quality crop.
Abundant rainfall, particularly in the southern South Plains, led to difficulty in timely application of glyphosate and fertilizer, resulting in weedy, N-deficient fields. Additionally, zinc deficiencies were apparent in this region.
Cotton seeded during early May suffered emergence and damping off problems. Nematodes continue to be problematic, but were most severe in the southern and western South Plains. Nematode tolerant varieties, along with Temik and early-season applications of Vydate continue to be the mainstay for managing nematodes. Verticillium was troublesome in some areas causing severe yield loss on the more susceptible varieties.
Early-season thrips pressure was moderate across the region. Counties south of Lubbock experienced significant damage from thrips in early planted cotton. Much of the cotton north of Lubbock was planted under warm conditions and did not suffer heavy damage from thrips. Cotton fleahoppers were abundant in the central and eastern areas of the South Plains, and portions of the Panhandle, but a single insecticide application was all that was required for control. An estimated 564,000 acres were treated for cotton fleahopper. However, because of the extended warm fall, fleahopper damage in non-treated cotton caused little yield loss.
Aphids were abundant in the southern, central and eastern South Plains. Approximately 700,000 acres of cotton were successfully treated for aphids. Lygus were
5
abundant in the central, northeastern and western South Plains, and occurred earlier than normal. However, most Lygus remained relegated to weedy areas. Approximately 140,000 acres were treated for Lygus. Stinkbugs were prevalent in light to moderate numbers throughout the South Plains. Because of the infrequency of this pest on the South Plains, insecticide applications and timings were sometimes sub-optimal. Only 137,000 acres were treated for stinkbugs.
Lepidopterous pest were problematic in non-Bt cotton in the southwestern central, western and northern portions of the South Plains. These included bollworms, fall armyworms, beet armyworms, yellowstriped armyworms and cotton square borers. Populations of bollworms and cotton square borers occurred during mid to late July in the western and southwestern counties and throughout August most other areas. Non-Bt cotton comprised an estimated 40% of the total cotton acerage; somewhat lower than previous years.
Spider mites were a problem in the Lubbock area, particularly east of Lubbock. Approximately 70,000 acres were treated for mites.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Fiber properties were measured at the Fiber and Biopolymer Research Institute, Texas Tech University, with financial support from the Food and Fibers Research Grant Program of the Texas Department of Agriculture. Plains Cotton Improvement Program contributed additional financial support to the variety testing effort. The Plains Cotton Improvement Committee is important to the independent variety testing service and to the variety testing strategy of the Texas AgriLife Research breeding program in Lubbock as the High Plains continues to be relied upon as a consistent supplier of high quality cotton. Planting, seed and field preparation, plot maintenance, harvest, sample ginning, and data collection were performed by: Reagan Anders, Joel Arce, Troy Arce, Mark Arnold, Aaron Bost, Kenzie Buckner, Natalia Castillo, Trey Cutts, Heather Flippin, Joe Flores, Johnny Fuentes, Mitch Juenke, Brad Harris, Carol Kelly, Josephine Kirch, Jimmy Mabry, Nick Macha, Juliana Osorio-Marin, Kim Peters, Alexa Roberts, Monica Sheehan, Raymond Tillis, and Leslie Wells. Bacterial blight, verticillium wilt, and nematode ratings were performed Dr. Terry Wheeler, with the assistance of Evan Arnold, and Victor Mendoza. The assistance of all of these people is gratefully acknowledged and appreciated.
6
GLOSSARY OF TABLE HEADINGS
Yield and Turnout
Yield - Pounds of lint harvested per acre. Gin Turnout Lint - Percentage of lint of the stripper-harvested cotton. Seed - Percentage of seed of the stripper-harvested cotton. Agronomic Properties
- Determined from hand-snapped samples.
Percent Lint Picked - Lint fraction of seed cotton. Pulled - Lint fraction of burr cotton. Boll Size - Weight, in grams, of seed cotton per boll. Seed Index - Weight, in grams, of 100 fuzzy seed. Lint Index - Weight, in grams, of lint from 100 seed (calculated). Seed Per Boll - Average number of seed per boll (calculated).
Visual Properties
Maturity - Visual assessment of openness on a given date.
Storm Resistance - Visual rating from 1 (very loose boll type, considerable seed cotton loss) to 9 (very tight boll type, no seed cotton loss).
Height – Measured average plant height of a given variety.
Statistical Analysis
Mean - The average value for the trait being observed.
c.v.,% - Coefficient of variation. A relative measure of variation within a test, defined as the sample standard deviation expressed as a percentage of the sample mean.
LSD - Least significant difference. If the difference between two means exceeds this value, the two
means are significantly different at the 0.05 probability level. Fiber Properties
- Measured by High Volume Instrument (HVI)
Micronaire - A relative measure of fiber linear density (mass per unit length) determined by air permeability.
7
Length - An instrument measure of fiber length, expressed in hundredths of a inch, which approximates the classer’s staple length.
Uniformity - A measure of the uniformity of fiber length in a sample, measured as the ratio of mean length to upper half mean length, expressed as a percentage.
Strength - The force required to rupture (or break) a fiber sample, expressed in grams per tex.
Elongation - The amount that a fiber sample will stretch prior to breakage. This is a measure of the deformation of fiber at rupture expressed as percent change in length based on the original fiber length. Leaf Index- The visual estimate of the amount of cotton plant leaf material that remains in the lint after the ginning process, ranging from 1 to 7. Rd - Degree of reflectance. This measures how light or dark the fiber sample is, expressed as a percentage. Lower Rd values indicate a grayer sample. +b - Yellowness. This measures the degree of color pigmentation. Higher +b values indicate yellower samples. Color Grade - A function of the Rd and +b of the fiber sample. The color grade indicates the quadrant of the Nickerson-Hunter cotton colorimeter diagram in which Rd and +b values intersect. 1/
two samples are identical, only one color grade is reported. Fiber quality determinations are made on samples from two reps. If the color grade from these
Caparol and Dual-registered trademark of Syngenta Finish- Registered trademark of Bayer CropScience Gramoxone Inteon-trademark of Syngenta Temik- registered trademark of Bayer CropScience Treflan-trademark of Dow AgriScience Pix- trademark of BASF Folex-registered trademark of Amvac Super Boll-registered trademark of NuFarm Prep and Def-trademarks of Bayer CropScience Parazone-Registered trademark of MANA Prowl-trademark of BASF Roundup-registered trademark of Monsanto Roundup Ready Flex-registered trademark of Monsanto Trust- Registered trademark of AgriSolutions Array and Zenith-registered trademarks of Midtech R&D Telone II-Registered trademark of Dow AgriScience
NOTES
8
Table 1. Production information for furrow irrigated performance test at Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock, TX 2010.
Test: Uniform Variety Planting Date: May 21 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Prowl @ 1 qt/A applied pre plant Fertilizer: 100-20-0 lbs/A applied pre-plant Irrigations: 3.5 acre inches May 7 2.1 acre inches June 17 1.9 acre inches August 5 Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting Harvest Aids: Def @ 8oz/A October 14 Gramoxone @ 24oz/A + ½% crop oil applied October 20 Harvest Date: November 2 Freeze Date: November 13
9
Tabl
e 2.
Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed re
gion
al u
nifo
rm c
otto
n va
riety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, L
ubbo
ck 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/11/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
tSt
onev
ille
ST 5
458B
2RF
2014
28.9
46.0
37.1
26.6
6.8
11.2
7.3
35.0
895
33C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F18
9931
.845
.338
.730
.16.
210
.97.
432
.683
533
Mon
sant
o 10
R05
2B2R
218
9032
.342
.740
.430
.65.
89.
66.
933
.880
534
Fibe
rMax
FM
958
1877
29.6
44.3
38.0
30.4
6.9
12.3
7.9
33.3
856
32D
elta
pine
DP
555B
G/R
R18
7331
.846
.437
.730
.85.
89.
56.
235
.388
535
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F18
6231
.848
.338
.230
.26.
011
.27.
331
.393
632
All-
Tex
AT
Epic
B2R
F18
5429
.644
.938
.831
.26.
211
.07.
831
.278
535
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
1846
30.5
55.7
37.9
29.8
6.3
11.0
7.2
33.2
867
33St
onev
ille
ST 5
288B
2F18
3130
.747
.738
.230
.15.
79.
86.
334
.690
631
Seed
Sou
rce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
210
CT
1826
29.3
48.2
36.4
29.4
6.0
9.7
5.9
37.3
885
31
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
12 B
2F18
2030
.344
.636
.929
.76.
410
.76.
934
.295
432
Ston
evill
e ST
428
8B2F
1815
29.7
50.8
36.1
28.9
6.2
11.0
6.6
34.0
905
30D
elta
pine
DP
1044
B2R
F18
1530
.047
.337
.030
.05.
410
.86.
630
.288
532
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 5
65W
RF
1802
29.0
46.6
36.5
28.3
6.1
10.9
6.7
32.9
915
35M
onsa
nto
09R
348B
2R2
1796
30.7
44.5
38.4
30.5
6.9
11.4
7.6
40.8
896
32
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 3
67W
RF
1789
28.1
36.0
39.4
31.0
5.9
10.3
6.9
33.8
894
33Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
375
WR
F17
8330
.142
.537
.029
.15.
910
.46.
831
.993
333
Fibe
rMax
FM
174
0B2R
F17
3328
.939
.338
.930
.86.
111
.27.
531
.595
631
Del
tapi
ne D
P 12
1 R
F17
2930
.143
.039
.230
.06.
410
.67.
234
.786
433
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 4
99W
RF
1720
29.5
43.0
39.0
30.9
5.7
10.7
7.3
30.8
966
34
Fibe
rMax
FM
177
3LLB
217
1328
.648
.734
.327
.26.
512
.87.
131
.488
631
Det
apin
e D
P 11
33B
2RF
1713
30.9
41.7
36.1
29.9
5.9
10.7
6.3
32.1
815
33D
elta
pine
DP
1028
B2R
F17
1332
.341
.641
.832
.36.
010
.47.
732
.683
534
Nex
Gen
NG
4010
B2R
F17
1329
.547
.036
.827
.45.
810
.36.
330
.289
632
Fibe
rMax
FM
916
0B2F
1711
29.3
46.1
36.8
29.5
6.1
11.2
6.9
32.4
916
30
Det
apin
e D
P 11
37 B
2RF
1696
31.1
43.5
40.0
29.0
5.8
9.5
6.8
33.9
866
33St
onev
ille
ST 4
554B
2RF
1681
28.5
45.2
36.0
29.1
6.8
11.0
6.9
35.3
905
32N
exG
en N
G40
12 B
2RF
1678
27.6
44.2
34.2
28.4
5.8
11.1
6.1
26.6
904
33N
exG
en N
G25
49 B
2RF
1678
28.7
47.5
35.2
28.0
5.2
10.5
6.2
29.9
947
34A
ll-Te
x A
T 65
207
B2R
F16
7430
.847
.637
.129
.46.
410
.96.
834
.994
533
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
10
Tabl
e 2.
Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed re
gion
al u
nifo
rm c
otto
n va
riety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, L
ubbo
ck 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/11/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
32B
2RF
1664
29.9
41.0
38.9
31.4
6.2
10.3
7.0
34.5
885
31B
ayer
Cro
p Sc
ienc
e B
CSX
101
0B2F
1657
28.9
49.7
35.4
27.5
6.1
12.8
7.4
29.2
915
32Se
ed S
ourc
e G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
12 C
T16
4830
.149
.735
.528
.46.
310
.46.
037
.188
631
All-
Tex
AT
8115
8 R
F16
3627
.847
.934
.827
.37.
211
.96.
836
.880
531
Bay
er C
rop
Scie
nce
BC
SX 1
030B
2F16
3329
.546
.138
.429
.56.
110
.06.
437
.496
632
Del
tapi
ne D
P 17
4 R
F16
1529
.843
.241
.831
.96.
210
.57.
932
.983
535
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 7
216
1528
.245
.934
.026
.66.
611
.56.
633
.980
334
All-
Tex
AT
Ape
x B
2RF
1606
27.2
46.4
37.4
28.6
5.7
10.8
6.8
31.4
905
33Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
519
WR
F16
0527
.944
.837
.028
.85.
610
.66.
631
.484
633
Fibe
rMax
FM
918
0B2F
1601
27.5
46.4
34.4
27.2
6.3
12.1
7.0
31.3
916
31
All-
Tex
AT
8122
0 B
2RF
1591
27.1
46.1
35.3
24.7
5.6
11.0
6.4
31.1
945
32Fi
berM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F15
7628
.544
.837
.128
.46.
011
.57.
231
.090
530
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F15
7528
.346
.634
.928
.36.
612
.07.
132
.591
630
Am
eric
ot A
M 1
532
B2R
F15
7228
.143
.836
.226
.36.
311
.36.
734
.295
530
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
1572
30.1
44.1
38.3
29.6
6.0
10.4
6.9
33.5
914
31
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 5
69W
RF
1566
29.1
44.6
38.2
29.7
5.7
10.0
6.8
31.9
956
32Fi
berM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
1561
28.2
45.7
34.5
25.7
6.3
12.1
6.7
32.6
867
32C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
GX
100
1B2R
F15
5927
.848
.034
.025
.25.
610
.65.
833
.296
532
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F15
5028
.245
.437
.028
.65.
410
.46.
530
.993
631
Fibe
rMax
FM
905
8F15
1627
.044
.636
.227
.86.
211
.57.
031
.890
631
Bay
er C
rop
Scie
nce
BC
SX 1
040B
2F14
8225
.946
.833
.626
.96.
112
.16.
633
.493
530
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
4 B
2RF
1461
25.5
46.4
35.6
28.4
6.5
11.7
6.7
34.6
986
30C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
520B
2RF
1428
27.8
46.7
37.0
28.4
5.4
10.6
6.8
29.1
946
32C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
020B
2RF
1428
26.5
46.4
35.2
27.7
5.9
11.4
6.4
32.2
944
30N
exG
en N
G34
10 R
F14
2327
.246
.635
.228
.27.
011
.76.
836
.285
630
Mea
n16
8629
.145
.637
.028
.96.
110
.96.
833
.189
532
c.v.
%13
.45.
68.
93.
34.
47.
44.
55.
94.
86.
212
.85.
7LS
D 0
.05
264
1.9
4.7
2.0
2.2
0.8
0.8
0.7
2.6
61
2
11
Tabl
e 2A
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed re
gion
al u
nifo
rm v
arie
ty te
st a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Lub
bock
201
0
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 54
58B
2RF
4.5
1.15
81.2
32.9
8.4
476
.19.
221
-4,3
1-4
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
303
5RF
4.3
1.15
82.3
31.1
10.2
278
.79.
321
-1,2
1-4
Mon
sant
o 10
R05
2B2R
2 4.
51.
1582
.830
.710
.12
78.5
9.3
21-1
,21-
4 F
iber
Max
FM
958
4.
21.
1882
.433
.27.
12
80.1
8.3
21-2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 55
5BG
/RR
4.
01.
1581
.031
.17.
12
80.7
8.4
21-1
,21-
2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 4.
51.
1682
.431
.29.
21
79.6
9.1
11-2
,21-
2 A
ll-Te
x A
T Ep
ic B
2RF
4.3
1.17
82.5
32.4
9.7
277
.59.
321
-1,3
2-1
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
4.2
1.17
82.9
33.4
8.7
278
.19.
221
-1,3
1-3
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 52
88B
2F
4.4
1.17
82.3
30.9
8.0
379
.68.
521
-1,2
1-2
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
210
CT
4.5
1.15
82.5
32.9
9.1
280
.17.
921
-1,3
1-2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
12 B
2F
4.8
1.12
82.3
31.9
9.1
278
.09.
121
-2,2
1-4
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 42
88B
2F
4.5
1.14
81.0
30.9
9.3
279
.19.
021
-1,2
1-4
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
44 B
2RF
4.1
1.15
82.4
32.1
10.1
279
.48.
721
-1,2
1-2
Phy
toG
en P
HY
565
WR
F 4.
31.
1883
.033
.59.
83
77.7
8.9
31-1
,31-
3 M
onsa
nto
09R
348B
2R2
4.0
1.14
81.8
30.5
8.0
478
.78.
131
-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
367
WR
F 4.
31.
1682
.932
.49.
22
78.1
9.4
21-3
Phy
toG
en P
HY
375
WR
F 4.
31.
1381
.630
.18.
42
78.2
9.3
21-1
,21-
4 F
iber
Max
FM
174
0B2R
F 4.
31.
1582
.631
.98.
02
76.6
8.8
21-2
,41-
3 D
elta
pine
DP
121
RF
4.5
1.16
83.0
32.0
9.7
278
.29.
121
-1,2
1-2
Phy
toG
en P
HY
499
WR
F 4.
31.
1682
.633
.69.
43
78.8
8.8
21-1
,21-
2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
773L
LB2
4.0
1.22
81.8
34.4
7.2
379
.58.
721
-1,3
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
33 B
2RF
4.4
1.18
83.6
32.8
9.2
179
.39.
021
-1 D
elta
pine
DP
1028
B2R
F 4.
41.
1482
.829
.89.
82
79.6
9.3
21-1
Nex
Gen
NG
4010
B2R
F 4.
31.
1983
.033
.98.
42
76.6
9.4
21-1
,32-
1 F
iber
Max
FM
916
0B2F
4.
01.
2083
.232
.77.
22
81.2
8.2
21-1
,21-
2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
37 B
2RF
4.6
1.14
83.1
29.5
9.6
179
.79.
221
-1 S
tone
ville
ST
4554
B2R
F 4.
31.
1582
.932
.610
.52
77.1
9.5
21-3
,21-
4 N
exG
en N
G40
12 B
2RF
4.0
1.17
82.0
33.3
7.4
378
.89.
121
-1,2
1-2
Nex
Gen
NG
2549
B2R
F 4.
11.
1082
.730
.59.
84
77.5
8.4
31-1
All-
Tex
AT
6520
7 B
2RF
4.3
1.15
82.8
31.1
9.3
378
.19.
021
-2,2
1-4
12
Tabl
e 2A
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed re
gion
al u
nifo
rm v
arie
ty te
st a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Lub
bock
201
0
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
32B
2RF
4.3
1.16
82.9
32.5
8.7
279
.38.
821
-1 B
ayer
Cro
p Sc
ienc
e B
CSX
101
0B2F
4.
21.
1681
.830
.97.
33
76.8
9.4
21-4
,31-
3 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
12 C
T 4.
21.
1582
.233
.09.
52
80.9
8.5
21-1
All-
Tex
AT
8115
8 R
F 4.
01.
1680
.730
.78.
83
79.6
8.4
21-2
,31-
1 B
ayer
Cro
p Sc
ienc
e B
CSX
103
0B2F
4.
21.
1682
.230
.38.
53
79.7
9.0
21-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 17
4 R
F 4.
31.
1982
.429
.98.
43
79.1
8.5
21-2
,31-
1 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 7
2 4.
21.
2183
.136
.18.
53
76.5
9.2
21-4
,31-
3 A
ll-Te
x A
T A
pex
B2R
F 4.
11.
1782
.029
.99.
12
77.9
9.1
21-2
,21-
4 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 5
19W
RF
4.3
1.18
82.2
33.2
9.1
378
.08.
821
-1,3
1-3
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
180B
2F
4.3
1.20
83.1
32.6
7.9
279
.58.
221
-1,3
1-1
All-
Tex
AT
8122
0 B
2RF
4.3
1.18
82.0
31.0
8.1
379
.08.
421
-1,3
1-1
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F
3.9
1.21
82.6
33.1
7.6
280
.98.
221
-1,2
1-2
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F 4.
11.
1683
.031
.68.
54
77.4
8.6
31-1
Am
eric
ot A
M 1
532
B2R
F 4.
01.
1682
.129
.98.
21
78.2
9.2
11-2
,31-
3 M
onsa
nto
09R
637R
2 4.
71.
1683
.430
.310
.42
79.2
9.1
21-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
569
WR
F 4.
01.
1582
.833
.310
.31
78.3
9.7
21-3
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
4.1
1.21
82.7
34.1
7.8
279
.38.
621
-1,2
1-2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
4.5
1.18
83.2
31.2
8.8
377
.38.
431
-1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 4
020B
2RF
4.3
1.18
82.3
30.1
8.8
179
.79.
321
-1,2
1-3
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
058F
4.
21.
2181
.731
.86.
84
77.1
8.3
31-1
,31-
2
Bay
er C
rop
Scie
nce
BC
SX 1
040B
2F
4.5
1.24
84.2
32.6
7.8
377
.08.
431
-1,3
1-2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
4 B
2RF
3.9
1.18
83.0
33.4
9.3
378
.68.
921
-1,2
1-2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
352
0B2R
F 4.
31.
1682
.530
.69.
83
78.4
8.9
21-2
,31-
3 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
020B
2RF
4.1
1.13
82.2
30.0
9.8
377
.58.
931
-1,3
1-3
Nex
Gen
NG
3410
RF
3.7
1.20
82.6
33.1
8.2
378
.18.
721
-2,3
1-1
Mea
n4.
21.
1782
.531
.98.
82
78.6
8.8
c.v.
%3.
81.
50.
72.
14.
330
.21.
62.
2LS
D 0
.05
0.3
0.03
1.2
1.3
0.8
12.
50.
4
13
Table 3. Yield summary of the irrigated cotton variety test at Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock.
Comp.Designation 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Average Average*
All-Tex AT Apex RF 1439 1015 1902 1065 1606 1405Croplan Genetics CG 3020B2RF 1227 905 1746 1344 1428 1330Deltapine DP 121 RF 1669 1179 1953 1390 1729 1584Deltapine DP 555 BR 1140 865 1958 1390 1873 1445FiberMax FM 958 1149 1381 1813 1599 1877 1564FiberMax FM 9058F 1456 1609 1937 1421 1615 1608PhytoGen PHY 72 1234 757 1648 1424 1615 1336Stoneville STV 4554 B2RF 1476 1264 1962 1185 1681 1514
Croplan Genetics CG 3035RF 901 1951 1479 1899 1558 1526Croplan Genetics CG 3220B2RF 944 2003 1658 1862 1617 1585Croplan Genetics CG 3520B2RF 1152 1735 1196 1428 1378 1346Croplan Genetics CG 4020B2RF 1030 1833 1423 1550 1459 1427FiberMax FM 9180B2F 1366 1964 1172 1601 1526 1494
Americot AM 1532 B2RF 1816 1137 1572 1508 1349FiberMax FM 1740B2F 2197 1871 1733 1934 1775FiberMax FM 9160B2F 1876 1355 1711 1647 1488NexGen NG3348 B2RF 1663 1364 1575 1534 1375NexGen NG3410 RF 1635 1421 1423 1493 1334PhytoGen PHY 375WRF 1948 1821 1783 1851 1692Seed Source Genetics SSG HQ 210 CT 1764 1789 1826 1793 1634Stoneville ST 5458 B2RF 2104 1964 2014 2027 1868
* Patterson, R.E. 1950. A methods of adjustment for calculating comparable yields in variety tests.
Five Year Average
Four Year Average
Three Year Average
14
Table 4. Production information for pivot irrigated performance test at Texas AgriLife Research, Halfway, TX 2010.
Test: Uniform Variety Planting Date: May 6 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Trifluralin @ 1 ½ pt/A applied pre-plant Dual @ 12oz/A applied July 21 Fertilizer: 80-20-0 lbs/A applied June 14 Irrigations: 6.2 acre inches during season Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting Orthene 3.2 oz/A applied June 9 Growth Regulator: Pix @ 12 oz/A applied July 20 Harvest Date: November 9 Freeze Date: November 13
15
Tabl
e 5.
Res
ults
of t
he p
ivot
irrig
ated
uni
form
var
iety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Rea
sear
ch, H
alfw
ay 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l09
/29/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t F
iber
Max
FM
905
8F
2011
27.9
44.6
37.0
29.6
6.8
12.2
7.6
33.4
756
28 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 4
99W
RF
1945
26.3
39.2
39.1
32.5
6.1
11.2
7.4
32.7
655
35 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 19
2829
.645
.139
.332
.57.
011
.77.
934
.671
530
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
1927
27.6
42.7
37.4
30.6
6.2
10.9
7.1
32.4
656
30 N
exG
en N
G25
49 B
2RF
1916
28.2
47.4
34.6
28.3
5.6
10.9
6.0
32.1
697
31
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F
1910
28.4
45.2
37.2
30.7
6.3
11.5
7.1
32.7
705
27 D
elta
pine
DP
0912
B2F
18
8127
.944
.935
.928
.96.
611
.77.
033
.964
529
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
1876
27.1
48.9
34.3
27.7
5.4
11.0
6.0
30.7
795
29 F
iber
Max
FM
958
18
7628
.343
.736
.828
.86.
612
.17.
432
.573
629
Phy
toG
en P
HY
367
WR
F 18
5028
.845
.838
.332
.55.
711
.16.
933
.264
529
Phy
toG
en P
HY
375
WR
F 18
3627
.542
.637
.329
.85.
710
.66.
731
.673
430
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
44 B
2RF
1814
27.9
47.7
34.2
27.7
6.9
11.4
6.1
31.3
695
28 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 5
19W
RF
1803
27.5
44.7
35.5
28.9
6.1
11.1
6.4
33.9
586
31 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
10 C
T 17
9126
.546
.534
.327
.66.
210
.96.
035
.460
529
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 45
54B
2RF
1782
28.9
44.6
38.3
31.5
6.7
11.5
7.5
34.5
604
28
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
17
7728
.146
.436
.629
.55.
910
.46.
433
.466
529
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
740B
2RF
1775
26.8
44.5
36.4
29.5
6.4
11.9
7.3
32.0
746
29 S
tone
ville
ST
5288
B2F
17
4927
.245
.834
.627
.86.
111
.06.
233
.766
529
Del
tapi
ne D
P 12
1 R
F 17
4028
.643
.138
.731
.25.
710
.57.
031
.774
530
Phy
toG
en P
HY
569
WR
F 17
2727
.544
.235
.328
.35.
910
.56.
034
.758
532
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 54
58B
2RF
1720
26.5
44.3
35.2
28.7
6.7
12.5
7.3
32.6
635
30 D
elta
pine
DP
104
B2R
F 17
1526
.148
.035
.228
.26.
312
.46.
832
.378
628
All-
Tex
AT
8122
0 B
2RF
1712
27.0
45.3
35.0
28.5
6.2
11.6
6.6
32.9
735
29 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 7
2 17
0429
.848
.936
.730
.56.
411
.16.
834
.560
430
All-
Tex
AT
Epic
B2R
F 17
0028
.443
.335
.728
.56.
311
.87.
131
.866
529
Del
tapi
ne D
P 55
5BG
/RR
16
9629
.043
.537
.530
.95.
99.
66.
037
.361
430
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
33 B
2RF
1690
29.1
41.8
36.5
29.2
6.4
11.1
6.9
33.3
545
30 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
520B
2RF
1671
25.7
44.2
34.6
26.1
5.6
11.0
6.2
31.1
745
28 F
iber
Max
FM
918
0B2F
16
7027
.243
.934
.827
.96.
812
.77.
133
.666
628
All-
Tex
AT
6520
7 B
2RF
1667
26.4
43.4
35.0
28.8
5.8
11.3
6.4
31.9
665
31
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
16
Tabl
e 5.
Res
ults
of t
he p
ivot
irrig
ated
uni
form
var
iety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Rea
sear
ch, H
alfw
ay 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l09
/29/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 16
6527
.646
.234
.330
.97.
012
.77.
034
.161
630
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
160B
2F
1658
26.3
44.4
30.7
29.3
7.5
11.3
6.6
34.1
646
30 D
elta
pine
DP
174
RF
1654
27.7
43.1
37.4
29.8
6.9
11.1
7.0
36.6
686
30 A
ll-Te
x A
T A
pex
B2R
F 16
4225
.344
.235
.629
.36.
111
.56.
533
.366
529
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
773L
LB2
1641
26.1
46.5
35.0
28.2
6.9
12.5
6.9
35.3
686
29
Nex
Gen
NG
4010
B2R
F 16
1925
.845
.133
.626
.16.
111
.76.
332
.568
529
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 42
88B
2F
1615
26.9
45.3
35.3
29.3
7.2
12.2
6.9
36.8
635
27 N
exG
en N
G34
10 R
F 16
1226
.746
.033
.226
.87.
213
.57.
233
.164
630
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
37 B
2RF
1582
29.1
42.8
36.4
27.8
6.6
10.3
7.3
32.0
456
31 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
12 C
T 15
8128
.347
.135
.325
.55.
810
.76.
033
.958
628
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 15
6526
.541
.935
.628
.96.
412
.07.
032
.555
632
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F 15
6025
.444
.233
.226
.96.
211
.66.
432
.573
529
Am
eric
ot A
M 1
532
B2R
F 15
3725
.243
.133
.426
.45.
510
.95.
931
.371
629
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
1534
27.9
42.9
35.8
29.1
6.1
10.8
6.6
33.0
606
30 D
elta
pine
DP
1032
B2R
F 15
1627
.441
.936
.929
.36.
210
.86.
734
.160
630
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
15
1323
.245
.731
.725
.36.
212
.86.
331
.374
629
Nex
Gen
NG
4012
B2R
F 15
1026
.243
.635
.228
.16.
311
.66.
733
.155
630
Mon
sant
o 10
R05
2B2R
2 15
0629
.642
.937
.829
.46.
19.
86.
336
.040
631
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
15
0325
.245
.134
.227
.16.
512
.56.
932
.455
531
Phy
toG
en P
HY
565
WR
F 14
9625
.643
.435
.828
.65.
911
.46.
732
.056
531
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
302
0 B
2RF
1495
24.9
44.5
33.2
26.4
6.4
11.7
6.2
34.7
615
27 N
exG
en N
G33
48 B
2RF
1483
24.5
43.1
34.2
28.0
6.5
12.6
7.0
31.7
686
27 F
iber
Max
FM
184
5LLB
2 14
3825
.945
.333
.626
.86.
912
.16.
536
.063
628
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
28 B
2RF
1382
29.7
42.2
35.2
28.3
6.0
10.6
6.0
35.4
486
30 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
158
RF
1317
24.8
44.7
33.6
26.6
6.7
11.9
7.2
35.6
736
28
Mea
n16
8127
.144
.535
.528
.76.
311
.46.
733
.364
529
c.v.
%13
.45.
95.
45.
06.
46.
53.
35.
74.
413
.411
.84.
9LS
D 0
.05
316
2.2
3.3
3.6
3.7
0.8
0.8
0.8
3.0
121
2
17
Tabl
e 5A
. Res
ults
of t
he p
ivot
irrig
ated
uni
form
var
iety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, H
alfw
ay 2
010
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
058F
3.
71.
1981
.131
.37.
32
79.9
7.3
31-1
,41-
1 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 4
99W
RF
3.9
1.15
81.8
31.8
9.2
476
.98.
331
-1,3
1-2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
303
5RF
3.8
1.12
82.0
29.5
10.6
178
.58.
821
-1,3
1-1
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
3.8
1.13
81.8
32.5
8.7
278
.88.
821
-1,3
1-1
Nex
Gen
NG
2549
B2R
F 3.
41.
0882
.229
.89.
73
78.0
7.9
31-1
,31-
2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F
3.7
1.17
82.1
31.5
7.6
180
.57.
521
-2,3
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
12 B
2F
4.0
1.12
81.0
30.1
8.9
378
.78.
721
-2,3
1-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
4.1
1.17
82.2
30.4
9.1
377
.17.
831
-2 F
iber
Max
FM
958
3.
81.
1581
.731
.47.
12
80.3
7.6
31-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
367
WR
F 3.
61.
1380
.430
.69.
43
78.0
8.8
21-2
,31-
1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
375
WR
F 3.
91.
1280
.328
.78.
53
79.0
8.3
31-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
44 B
2RF
3.9
1.12
81.2
30.6
9.6
278
.67.
931
-1,3
1-2
Phy
toG
en P
HY
519
WR
F 3.
31.
1380
.832
.89.
61
78.5
8.9
21-2
,21-
4 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
10 C
T 3.
71.
1581
.432
.78.
92
80.4
8.1
21-2
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 45
54B
2RF
4.2
1.13
81.5
31.0
10.1
377
.68.
821
-1,3
1-2
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
3.
81.
1281
.328
.79.
22
78.4
8.1
31-1
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
740B
2RF
3.9
1.12
81.3
30.7
8.4
180
.17.
921
-2,3
1-1
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 52
88B
2F
4.0
1.16
80.8
30.0
8.0
479
.07.
531
-1 D
elta
pine
DP
121
RF
4.1
1.14
81.3
30.8
9.4
278
.08.
721
-2,3
1-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
569
WR
F 4.
01.
1282
.030
.410
.41
77.4
9.2
21-4
,31-
3
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 54
58B
2RF
3.5
1.10
78.9
31.0
7.7
377
.78.
921
-2,3
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
4 B
2RF
3.5
1.14
82.4
30.7
9.4
378
.58.
131
-1,3
1-2
All-
Tex
AT
8122
0 B
2RF
3.8
1.15
81.4
30.1
7.6
379
.38.
021
-2,3
1-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
72
4.0
1.22
82.9
35.2
8.7
278
.18.
721
-2,3
1-1
All-
Tex
AT
Epic
B2R
F 4.
01.
1081
.829
.910
.02
78.3
8.8
21-1
,31-
1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 55
5BG
/RR
3.
51.
0978
.429
.47.
91
79.6
7.3
31-1
,31-
2 D
elta
pine
DP
1133
B2R
F 4.
11.
1482
.131
.99.
72
78.6
8.9
21-2
,21-
4 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
520B
2RF
4.0
1.15
81.7
28.5
9.6
377
.88.
331
-1,3
1-2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
180B
2F
3.8
1.13
82.0
29.4
9.0
180
.58.
221
-1,2
1-2
All-
Tex
AT
6520
7 B
2RF
3.9
1.12
81.9
29.4
9.2
276
.38.
631
-2,3
1-3
18
Tabl
e 5A
. Res
ults
of t
he p
ivot
irrig
ated
uni
form
var
iety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, H
alfw
ay 2
010
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 3.
51.
1181
.131
.19.
31
78.4
8.7
21-2
,31-
1 F
iber
Max
FM
916
0B2F
3.
31.
1782
.331
.87.
43
80.4
7.6
31-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 17
4 R
F 3.
71.
1481
.029
.08.
62
79.1
8.4
31-1
All-
Tex
AT
Ape
x B
2RF
3.7
1.14
81.2
28.2
8.2
278
.98.
521
-1,3
1-1
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
773L
LB2
4.1
1.18
81.8
31.8
6.9
279
.57.
921
-2,3
1-1
Nex
Gen
NG
4010
B2R
F 3.
91.
1581
.631
.58.
32
77.2
8.4
21-2
,41-
1 S
tone
ville
ST
4288
B2F
4.
21.
1380
.830
.18.
73
77.9
8.5
31-1
Nex
Gen
NG
3410
RF
3.4
1.19
81.6
30.7
8.1
278
.78.
521
-2,3
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
37 B
2RF
3.9
1.11
81.9
29.2
9.0
180
.08.
621
-1 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
12 C
T 3.
61.
1380
.732
.28.
73
79.1
8.1
31-1
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 3.
11.
1180
.529
.38.
34
80.3
7.5
31-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F 3.
81.
1681
.529
.79.
02
77.9
8.1
31-1
Am
eric
ot A
M 1
532
B2R
F 3.
71.
1380
.428
.38.
72
78.7
8.7
21-2
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
4.0
1.11
82.0
29.0
10.6
179
.09.
121
-1 D
elta
pine
DP
1032
B2R
F 3.
61.
1581
.531
.08.
81
80.1
8.3
21-1
,21-
2
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
4.
11.
2382
.931
.97.
44
77.6
7.9
31-1
,31-
2 N
exG
en N
G40
12 B
2RF
3.5
1.16
81.7
33.6
7.4
179
.48.
921
-1,2
1-2
Mon
sant
o 10
R05
2B2R
2 3.
61.
1381
.130
.58.
73
79.1
8.4
21-2
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
3.
21.
1580
.629
.57.
41
79.1
8.7
21-1
,31-
1 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 5
65W
RF
3.3
1.15
80.9
31.7
9.3
376
.78.
531
-1,3
1-2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
302
0 B
2RF
3.0
1.12
80.1
29.4
8.9
280
.38.
521
-1,2
1-2
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F 3.
81.
1582
.630
.98.
63
77.7
8.3
31-1
,31-
2 F
iber
Max
FM
184
5LLB
2 3.
71.
2081
.933
.07.
42
80.2
8.1
21-2
,31-
1 D
elta
pine
DP
1028
B2R
F 3.
71.
1180
.728
.99.
02
79.4
8.8
21-1
,21-
2 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
158
RF
3.8
1.15
82.6
30.7
9.3
380
.68.
021
-1,3
1-1
Mea
n3.
71.
1481
.430
.68.
72
78.8
8.3
c.v.
%9.
31.
90.
93.
66.
439
.01.
23.
6LS
D 0
.05
0.7
0.04
1.5
2.2
1.1
22.
00.
6
19
Table 6. Production information for the irrigated cotton variety test at Texas AgriLife Research, Halfway
Comp.Designation 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Average Average*
Croplan Genetics 3020B2RF 1522 951 991 1525 1495 1297FiberMax FM 958 1843 1038 1017 1524 1876 1460FiberMax FM 9058F 1720 971 1065 1538 2011 1461
Croplan Genetics CG 3035RF 1073 987 1533 1928 1380 1453Croplan Genetics CG 3220B2RF 970 917 1519 1665 1268 1341Croplan Genetics CG 4020B2RF 946 974 1495 1560 1244 1317Deltapine DP 121 RF 1033 1042 1577 1740 1348 1421FiberMax FM 1740B2F 1103 1003 1610 1775 1373 1446FiberMax FM 9180B2F 970 1100 1357 1670 1274 1347Seed Source Genetics SSG HQ 210 CT 944 946 1127 1791 1202 1275
Americot AM 1532 B2F 943 1509 1537 1330 1287Croplan Genetics CG 3520B2RF 1009 1665 1671 1448 1405FiberMax FM 9160B2F 958 1592 1658 1403 1360NexGen NG3348 B2RF 927 1693 1483 1368 1325NexGen NG3410 RF 911 1662 1612 1395 1352PhytoGen PHY 375WRF 1009 1346 1836 1397 1354PhytoGen PHY 72 941 1540 1704 1395 1352Stoneville ST 4554 B2RF 1115 1506 1782 1468 1425Stoneville ST 5458 B2RF 893 1513 1720 1375 1332
* Patterson, R.E. 1950. A method of adjustment for calculating comparable yields in variety tests.
Five Year Average
Four Year Average
Three Year Average
20
Table 7. Production information for drip irrigated performance test at the AG-CARES farm, Lamesa, TX 2010.
Test: Uniform Variety Planting Date: May 19 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Trifluralin @ 1.3pt/A applied pre-plant Caparol @ 1.5pt/A applied May 22 Fertilizer: 20-10-0-5 @ 300 lbs/A applied pre-plant
32-0-0 @ 30 lbs/A applied June 2 (fertigation) 32-0-0 @ 30lbs/A applied June 30 (fertigation) 32-0-0 @ 30lbs/A applied July 21 (fertigation) Irrigations: 4.39 acre-in applied pre-plant 5.1 acre-in applied May-September Growth Regulator: Pix @ 16oz/A applied July 14 Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting Harvest Aids: Prep @ 2 pt/A + 2oz ET with .45lbs/A Zennith September 30 Gramoxone Inteon @ 32 oz/A + .25lb/A Array October 18 Harvest Date: October 30 Freeze Date: November 13
21
Tabl
e 8.
Res
ults
of t
he d
rip ir
rigat
ed u
nifo
rm v
arie
ty te
st a
t the
AG
-CA
RES
farm
, Lam
esa
2010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/04/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
tD
elta
pine
DP
174
RF
1488
31.0
43.2
39.6
31.2
6.1
10.5
7.2
33.4
705
27St
onev
ille
ST 4
554B
2RF
1411
28.7
44.9
36.1
29.0
5.9
12.0
7.0
30.7
754
25St
onev
ille
ST 5
458B
2RF
1389
28.8
41.8
38.7
31.2
5.9
10.0
7.0
32.5
645
26Fi
berM
ax F
M 9
160B
2F
1346
29.3
43.6
38.4
31.1
5.8
10.5
6.8
32.8
766
23Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
367
WR
F 13
3426
.840
.838
.930
.85.
510
.06.
731
.479
324
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
44 B
2RF
1285
30.0
46.2
37.6
29.5
5.4
10.5
6.6
30.5
546
23Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
569
WR
F 12
5927
.742
.638
.429
.75.
09.
06.
032
.278
426
All-
Tex
AT
Epic
B2R
F 12
5030
.142
.638
.931
.55.
710
.57.
131
.574
424
Del
tapi
ne D
P 12
1 R
F 12
4528
.740
.239
.831
.45.
69.
56.
733
.470
525
Ston
evill
e ST
428
8B2F
12
4427
.943
.435
.828
.66.
111
.56.
732
.574
524
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 12
0629
.445
.337
.329
.65.
911
.06.
932
.071
523
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
303
5RF
1167
29.4
40.8
39.3
30.8
6.2
11.0
7.5
32.1
645
24A
ll-Te
x A
T 65
207
B2R
F 11
5528
.342
.238
.230
.85.
410
.06.
730
.776
525
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 5
19W
RF
1147
26.5
41.4
37.7
29.2
5.0
9.5
6.2
30.5
766
27M
onsa
nto
10R
052B
2R2
1138
29.6
39.3
41.0
31.5
5.4
9.5
7.0
31.1
505
25
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 5
65W
RF
1130
27.0
42.3
37.2
28.9
4.8
10.0
6.2
29.0
744
25D
elta
pine
DP
1137
B2R
F11
1430
.040
.839
.230
.65.
710
.57.
330
.676
524
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
33 B
2RF
1110
27.8
40.5
39.6
30.7
5.8
10.0
6.9
33.1
735
25Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
499
WR
F 11
0827
.239
.539
.030
.55.
110
.06.
930
.164
523
All-
Tex
AT
Ape
x B
2RF
1099
25.7
41.7
36.7
28.4
5.6
10.5
6.4
31.8
805
25
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 3
75W
RF
1094
28.5
41.7
38.7
30.8
5.3
10.0
6.8
30.4
684
25A
mer
icot
AM
153
2 B
2RF
1085
27.3
43.3
33.7
28.3
6.4
10.5
6.5
32.9
805
24B
ayer
Cro
p Sc
ienc
e B
CSX
103
0B2F
10
8028
.441
.838
.730
.15.
510
.06.
731
.770
424
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
4 B
2RF
1068
25.2
45.7
36.7
29.5
5.6
11.0
6.5
31.7
805
22C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
020
B2R
F 10
6525
.543
.534
.727
.56.
011
.06.
333
.478
522
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
28 B
2RF
1060
29.1
41.7
40.6
31.0
5.2
9.5
6.9
30.7
695
24Fi
berM
ax F
M 1
740B
2RF
1058
29.6
43.5
39.1
30.2
5.6
11.0
9.0
25.3
705
22D
elta
pine
DP
0912
B2F
10
5228
.242
.638
.330
.86.
010
.57.
032
.678
422
Fibe
rMax
FM
917
0B2F
10
5028
.843
.238
.431
.05.
511
.07.
330
.065
521
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 10
5028
.041
.337
.834
.05.
310
.56.
929
.175
524
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
22
Tabl
e 8.
Res
ults
of t
he d
rip ir
rigat
ed u
nifo
rm v
arie
ty te
st a
t the
AG
-CA
RES
farm
, Lam
esa
2010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/04/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
Del
tapi
ne D
P 55
5BG
/RR
10
4530
.446
.038
.931
.85.
08.
05.
834
.070
523
Fibe
rMax
FM
905
8F
1036
26.7
43.0
36.8
28.3
5.7
11.0
7.0
30.2
686
21N
exG
en N
G34
10 R
F 10
2226
.544
.437
.729
.56.
712
.07.
533
.566
624
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
1015
26.8
39.1
38.0
29.9
5.4
10.0
6.7
30.8
786
24B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
010B
2F
1013
27.9
44.0
36.5
29.0
5.7
11.5
6.9
30.0
634
24
Nex
Gen
NG
4010
B2R
F 98
727
.544
.835
.928
.45.
210
.06.
031
.375
522
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
974
28.6
40.5
38.9
30.0
5.3
9.5
6.5
32.1
784
23A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
220
B2R
F 97
025
.942
.136
.729
.15.
410
.06.
231
.579
523
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F 95
927
.245
.336
.828
.65.
910
.56.
632
.969
423
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
32B
2RF
958
28.7
39.6
40.4
31.8
5.3
9.0
6.4
33.4
684
24
Fibe
rMax
FM
918
0B2F
95
725
.742
.536
.228
.06.
111
.56.
832
.471
721
Nex
Gen
NG
4012
B2R
F 95
628
.242
.838
.329
.85.
210
.06.
530
.975
524
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F 93
526
.744
.936
.529
.25.
511
.06.
531
.176
622
Fibe
rMax
FM
184
5LLB
2 92
226
.143
.635
.828
.15.
512
.06.
928
.563
523
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
352
0B2R
F 92
027
.343
.338
.029
.94.
710
.56.
427
.674
422
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
910
25.6
45.6
34.2
26.9
4.9
10.5
5.5
30.6
655
23N
exG
en N
G25
49 B
2RF
864
27.0
45.0
35.5
28.9
5.1
10.5
6.0
30.1
767
22Se
ed S
ourc
e G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
10 C
T 86
029
.046
.237
.030
.26.
19.
05.
740
.269
421
Fibe
rMax
FM
958
85
426
.843
.237
.029
.06.
311
.57.
232
.565
622
All-
Tex
AT
8115
8 R
F 82
924
.643
.935
.427
.35.
611
.06.
331
.358
524
Bay
er C
rop
Scie
nce
BC
SX 1
040B
2F
818
22.8
42.5
33.4
25.7
5.7
11.5
6.2
30.9
704
22Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
72
776
27.2
45.5
34.9
27.4
6.0
11.5
6.3
33.5
644
24Se
ed S
ourc
e G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
12 C
T 75
029
.446
.237
.029
.95.
610
.06.
034
.350
419
Fibe
rMax
FM
177
3LLB
2 73
526
.946
.735
.928
.65.
912
.07.
129
.550
522
Ston
evill
e ST
528
8B2F
70
726
.841
.239
.431
.25.
19.
56.
232
.675
522
Mea
n10
5527
.743
.037
.529
.75.
610
.46.
631
.570
523
c.v.
%14
.45.
15.
13.
33.
96.
34.
96.
66.
017
.016
.17.
8LS
D 0
.05
213
2.0
3.1
2.5
2.3
0.7
1.0
0.9
3.8
171
3
23
Tabl
e 8A
. Res
ults
of t
he d
rip ir
rigat
ed u
nifo
rm v
arie
ty te
st a
t the
AG
-CA
RES
farm
, Lam
esa
2010
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Del
tapi
ne D
P 17
4 R
F 4.
51.
1581
.331
.28.
63
79.6
7.6
21-2
,31-
2 S
tone
ville
ST
4554
B2R
F 4.
71.
1583
.432
.29.
73
78.2
8.4
31-1
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 54
58B
2RF
4.7
1.13
80.7
32.5
8.3
378
.08.
531
-1 F
iber
Max
FM
916
0B2F
4.
01.
1882
.531
.97.
42
81.0
7.6
21-1
,31-
1 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 3
67W
RF
4.2
1.15
82.4
32.9
9.5
280
.38.
021
-1,3
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
44 B
2RF
4.1
1.14
82.0
31.4
9.8
280
.18.
221
-2 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 5
69W
RF
4.1
1.12
83.0
32.6
11.0
279
.68.
811
-2,3
1-1
All-
Tex
AT
Epic
B2R
F 4.
61.
1282
.033
.310
.12
79.2
8.2
21-2
,31-
1 D
elta
pine
DP
121
RF
4.7
1.13
82.6
31.4
9.2
378
.48.
131
-1 S
tone
ville
ST
4288
B2F
4.
91.
1281
.730
.59.
03
78.3
8.2
31-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 4.
51.
1382
.130
.89.
21
80.8
8.1
21-1
,21-
2 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 4.
01.
1382
.030
.910
.31
80.2
8.8
11-2
,21-
1 A
ll-Te
x A
T 65
207
B2R
F 4.
61.
1283
.130
.29.
03
78.2
8.1
31-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
519
WR
F 4.
01.
1681
.933
.59.
62
79.7
8.4
21-2
Mon
sant
o 10
R05
2B2R
2 4.
01.
1282
.630
.710
.01
80.5
8.4
21-1
,21-
2
Phy
toG
en P
HY
565
WR
F 4.
31.
1783
.534
.29.
83
78.1
7.9
31-1
,31-
2 D
elta
pine
DP
1137
B2R
F4.
51.
1483
.030
.39.
31
80.3
8.4
21-1
,31-
1 D
elta
pine
DP
1133
B2R
F3.
91.
1882
.332
.79.
23
78.5
8.3
31-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
499
WR
F 4.
21.
1582
.433
.29.
83
78.8
8.2
31-1
All-
Tex
AT
Ape
x B
2RF
4.5
1.14
82.4
30.0
9.0
380
.37.
921
-2
Phy
toG
en P
HY
375
WR
F 4.
41.
1381
.831
.18.
13
79.4
8.0
21-2
,31-
1 A
mer
icot
AM
153
2 B
2RF
3.9
1.14
81.0
30.0
8.8
280
.28.
621
-1 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
030B
2F
4.3
1.11
81.8
29.8
9.1
281
.58.
231
-1 D
elta
pine
DP
104
B2R
F 3.
91.
1482
.932
.98.
94
78.1
7.8
31-1
,31-
2 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
020
B2R
F 4.
41.
1282
.529
.89.
03
79.4
7.9
31-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
28 B
2RF
4.1
1.14
82.3
31.4
10.0
279
.38.
121
-1,3
1-1
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
740B
2RF
4.3
1.13
81.6
32.5
8.1
280
.67.
921
-1,3
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
12 B
2F
4.8
1.11
81.9
31.5
9.2
279
.27.
921
-2,3
1-2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F
4.2
1.17
82.0
32.4
7.1
281
.77.
321
-1,3
1-1
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 3.
91.
1181
.630
.08.
03
79.4
7.3
31-1
,31-
2
24
Tabl
e 8A
. Res
ults
of t
he d
rip ir
rigat
ed u
nifo
rm v
arie
ty te
st a
t the
AG
-CA
RES
farm
, Lam
esa
2010
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Del
tapi
ne D
P 55
5BG
/RR
3.
51.
1078
.830
.57.
93
81.2
7.5
21-2
,31-
1 F
iber
Max
FM
905
8F
4.0
1.19
81.7
32.1
7.5
280
.87.
231
-1 N
exG
en N
G34
10 R
F 3.
51.
1681
.832
.99.
02
80.1
8.2
21-2
,31-
1 N
exG
en N
G41
11 R
F 4.
41.
1483
.033
.99.
53
78.3
8.3
31-1
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
4.
11.
1481
.030
.67.
92
80.8
8.3
21-1
,21-
2
Nex
Gen
NG
4010
B2R
F 4.
51.
1682
.633
.38.
13
78.3
8.2
31-1
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
4.5
1.13
83.1
29.8
10.2
280
.88.
211
-1,3
1-1
All-
Tex
AT
8122
0 B
2RF
4.5
1.14
81.9
30.7
8.7
279
.77.
721
-2,3
1-2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F 4.
21.
1582
.230
.78.
83
80.3
8.1
21-2
,31-
1 D
elta
pine
DP
1032
B2R
F 4.
11.
1781
.331
.68.
53
78.2
7.6
31-1
,31-
2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
180B
2F
3.6
1.18
82.1
33.5
7.5
281
.97.
621
-1,2
1-2
Nex
Gen
NG
4012
B2R
F 3.
81.
1581
.431
.97.
62
79.3
8.5
21-1
,31-
1 N
exG
en N
G33
48 B
2RF
4.0
1.14
82.8
31.4
8.3
378
.67.
731
-1,3
1-2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
4.4
1.20
83.2
34.1
7.8
380
.87.
821
-2,3
1-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
352
0B2R
F 4.
41.
1381
.931
.09.
43
79.3
8.0
31-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
4.5
1.17
82.5
31.9
9.1
479
.77.
331
-1,3
1-2
Nex
Gen
NG
2549
B2R
F 4.
41.
0782
.031
.99.
65
76.8
7.6
31-2
,41-
1 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
10 C
T 4.
81.
1181
.632
.78.
12
79.9
6.9
21-2
,41-
1 F
iber
Max
FM
958
3.
91.
1881
.834
.46.
82
81.5
8.0
21-1
,21-
2 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
158
RF
3.5
1.18
82.9
33.3
8.6
280
.77.
921
-1,3
1-1
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
4.
31.
2283
.834
.17.
54
78.1
7.9
31-1
,31-
2 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 7
2 4.
21.
1882
.737
.68.
42
79.5
8.4
21-2
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
212
CT
4.5
1.11
81.6
32.1
9.2
180
.97.
821
-2 F
iber
Max
FM
177
3LLB
2 4.
21.
1882
.033
.76.
72
80.6
7.6
21-2
,31-
1 S
tone
ville
ST
5288
B2F
4.
31.
1481
.030
.78.
73
79.7
7.6
31-1
,31-
2
Mea
n4.
21.
1482
.131
.98.
82
79.7
8.0
c.v.
%9.
11.
40.
82.
24.
630
.31.
44.
0LS
D 0
.05
0.8
0.03
1.2
1.4
0.8
12.
30.
6
25
Table 9. Yield Summary of the drip irrigated cotton variety test at the AG-CARES farm, Lamesa
Comp.Name 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Average Average*
Croplan Genetics CG 3220B3RF 1500 1503 1727 1579 1206 1503Deltapine DP 121RF 1791 1535 1867 1602 1245 1608FiberMax FM 958 1519 1509 1327 1274 854 1297Stoneville STV 4554 B2RF 1363 1810 1574 1594 1411 1550
Croplan Genetics CG 3035RF 1408 1757 1509 1167 1460 1474Croplan Genetics CG 3520B2RF 1463 1569 1610 920 1391 1405Croplan Genetics CG 4020B2RF 1411 1581 1529 959 1370 1384FiberMax FM 1740B2F 1612 1670 1426 1058 1442 1456FiberMax FM 9180B2F 1418 1492 1382 957 1312 1326Seed Source Genetics SSG HQ 210 CT 1295 1381 1288 860 1206 1220
Americot AM 1532 B2RF 1660 1365 1085 1370 1422FiberMax FM 9058F 1782 1401 1036 1406 1458FiberMax FM 9160B2F 1645 1418 1346 1470 1522NexGen NG3348 B2RF 1390 1328 935 1218 1270NexGen NG3410 RF 1530 1358 1022 1303 1355PhytoGen 375WRF 1729 1586 1094 1470 1522Stoneville ST 5458B2RF 1824 1657 1389 1623 1675
*Patterson, R.E. 1950. A method of adjustment for calculating comparable yields in variety tests.
Three Year Average
Five Year Average
Four Year Average
26
Table 10. Production information for dryland performance test at Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock, TX 2010.
Test: Uniform Variety Planting Date: May 11 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Prowl @ 1qt/A applied pre-plant Caparol @ 1.2 qt/A and Dual Magnum @ 1.3pt/A applied May 12 Fertilizer: 120-20-0 lbs/A applied pre-plant Rainfall: 19.19 inches during season Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting Telone II fumigant (for nematodes) applied April 6 Harvest Aids: Gramoxone @ 32 oz/A + ½ % crop oil applied November 3 Harvest Date: November 22 Freeze Date: November 13
27
Tabl
e 11
. Res
ults
of t
he d
ryla
nd u
nifo
rm c
otto
n va
riety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, L
ubbo
ck 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/13/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t D
elta
pine
DP
1137
B2R
F 16
2129
.339
.239
.630
.06.
29.
56.
736
.955
535
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
1615
29.3
42.5
38.4
29.5
5.9
10.3
6.9
33.2
935
33 D
elta
pine
DP
1044
B2R
F 15
6029
.546
.536
.929
.05.
39.
86.
231
.388
531
Phy
toG
en P
HY
375
WR
F 15
1629
.042
.038
.729
.75.
810
.26.
932
.578
433
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
352
0B2R
F 15
0630
.245
.533
.526
.15.
611
.06.
130
.989
531
Phy
toG
en P
HY
569
WR
F 14
8628
.441
.736
.027
.46.
111
.26.
732
.769
530
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
058F
14
8528
.341
.237
.227
.76.
611
.67.
433
.395
628
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 52
88B
2F
1445
30.3
43.1
35.9
27.8
6.0
10.0
6.1
35.7
816
31 N
exG
en N
G40
12 B
2RF
1432
27.3
43.0
40.4
31.2
5.9
10.4
7.2
33.2
866
33 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 5
65W
RF
1426
26.5
41.9
36.2
27.3
6.5
11.5
6.8
34.2
734
32
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
160B
2F
1411
29.5
43.5
37.8
30.1
6.5
10.5
6.8
36.0
806
29 M
onsa
nto
09R
348B
2R2
1411
29.1
41.4
39.1
30.7
6.4
10.2
7.1
34.9
805
31 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 3
67W
RF
1398
30.1
40.3
37.5
29.1
5.8
9.9
6.4
33.7
904
29 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 4
99W
RF
1396
30.4
42.3
38.6
30.1
6.2
10.3
7.0
33.8
545
33 A
mer
icot
AM
153
2 B
2RF
1351
27.3
43.8
28.9
22.2
5.8
10.6
5.1
32.7
755
31
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
12 B
2F
1335
29.6
42.3
37.7
29.0
6.3
6.2
6.9
34.5
854
30 F
iber
Max
FM
918
0B2F
13
2726
.141
.735
.127
.36.
211
.86.
831
.793
626
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
303
5RF
1297
26.8
42.8
37.9
29.5
6.9
10.9
7.2
35.9
865
32 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
010B
2F
1296
27.6
44.1
36.5
28.7
6.5
10.5
6.5
36.4
884
31 F
iber
Max
FM
174
0B2R
F 12
9627
.539
.037
.628
.56.
711
.17.
235
.173
527
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 54
58B
2RF
1294
27.9
42.1
40.0
32.0
6.2
10.0
7.0
35.6
915
31 F
iber
Max
FM
958
12
6128
.444
.937
.127
.86.
812
.17.
632
.985
626
Phy
toG
en P
HY
519
WR
F 12
3729
.945
.737
.828
.45.
610
.26.
631
.660
532
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
1236
25.8
45.6
32.1
24.6
5.1
10.4
5.3
31.3
955
31 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
220
B2R
F 12
2925
.638
.534
.526
.55.
89.
95.
933
.981
530
Del
tapi
ne D
P 12
1 R
F 12
2127
.940
.738
.429
.45.
89.
87.
135
.279
434
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
4 B
2RF
1211
28.0
43.2
33.8
26.3
6.9
11.1
6.1
38.5
856
29 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
030B
2F
1207
28.0
41.9
37.1
27.9
6.2
10.9
7.0
32.9
716
31 D
elta
pine
DP
1028
B2R
F 12
0029
.238
.238
.030
.06.
29.
06.
138
.762
529
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F
1167
28.1
42.2
37.9
29.6
5.7
10.4
6.9
31.5
816
28
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
28
Tabl
e 11
. Res
ults
of t
he d
ryla
nd u
nifo
rm c
otto
n va
riety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, L
ubbo
ck 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/13/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
210
CT
1126
27.2
43.6
35.8
28.1
6.2
9.9
5.8
37.9
885
27 A
ll-Te
x A
T Ep
ic B
2RF
1099
25.0
40.0
38.8
30.7
7.4
11.2
7.7
38.3
865
32 N
exG
en N
G34
10 R
F 10
9424
.540
.535
.928
.47.
512
.37.
436
.484
629
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
212
CT
1094
25.9
44.6
35.3
27.4
5.6
9.9
5.8
34.5
854
24 N
exG
en N
G25
49 B
2RF
1093
26.5
44.3
34.7
27.5
5.5
10.6
6.1
31.5
897
28
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 45
54B
2RF
1084
27.8
45.1
36.3
27.9
6.4
11.3
6.9
33.4
784
30 A
ll-Te
x A
T A
pex
B2R
F 10
7425
.441
.036
.928
.05.
910
.26.
434
.181
532
All-
Tex
AT
6520
7 B
2RF
1068
26.1
41.0
35.1
27.4
6.2
10.7
6.4
34.0
805
32 S
tone
ville
ST
4288
B2F
10
6525
.741
.936
.128
.27.
311
.26.
938
.474
528
Del
tapi
ne D
P 17
4 R
F 10
5627
.941
.938
.329
.77.
010
.97.
337
.068
632
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
1027
28.6
43.9
36.7
28.1
6.4
11.7
7.3
32.1
806
25 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
220B
2RF
1020
28.0
42.2
37.8
29.5
6.6
11.2
7.3
34.1
815
32 N
exG
en N
G40
10 B
2RF
1019
26.0
42.0
35.2
27.4
5.9
10.4
6.1
34.0
786
31 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
040B
2F
1015
22.6
40.7
33.1
25.1
6.1
11.4
6.2
33.0
905
29 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
158
RF
1013
23.9
43.5
32.1
24.9
6.2
11.1
5.7
35.3
735
29
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F 10
0224
.739
.136
.727
.65.
810
.16.
234
.590
630
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F 97
925
.241
.234
.726
.76.
612
.16.
933
.288
628
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
33 B
2RF
938
29.0
37.3
38.9
29.2
6.5
9.9
6.9
36.7
735
32 F
iber
Max
FM
177
3LLB
2 87
527
.443
.235
.927
.77.
112
.77.
633
.354
628
Phy
toG
en P
HY
72
871
27.3
45.9
34.9
26.7
6.5
11.2
6.5
34.5
834
29
Mea
n12
2627
.542
.336
.528
.26.
210
.66.
634
.379
530
c.v.
%22
.08.
96.
65.
76.
37.
510
.27.
34.
923
.312
.87.
6LS
D 0
.05
328
3.4
3.9
5.1
3.6
0.9
2.2
1.0
3.4
261
3
Del
tapi
ne 5
55B
G/R
R, C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
020B
2RF,
Del
tapi
ne 1
032B
2RF,
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2,
and
Mon
sant
o 10
R05
2B2R
2 w
ere
drop
ped
due
to st
and
loss
29
Tabl
e 11
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
dry
land
uni
form
cot
ton
varie
ty te
st a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Lub
bock
201
0
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
37 B
2RF
4.6
1.10
82.0
29.7
9.1
178
.78.
821
-2 N
exG
en N
G41
11 R
F 4.
91.
1383
.334
.08.
71
77.6
9.3
21-1
,32-
1 D
elta
pine
DP
1044
B2R
F 4.
71.
1582
.631
.19.
51
78.5
8.6
21-2
,31-
1 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 3
75W
RF
4.4
1.12
81.3
30.1
8.6
277
.38.
731
-1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
520B
2RF
4.6
1.13
82.8
31.4
8.7
278
.78.
821
-1,3
1-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
569
WR
F 4.
51.
1582
.631
.910
.22
76.6
9.9
21-3
,22-
2 F
iber
Max
FM
905
8F
4.2
1.17
82.1
32.6
7.2
278
.28.
631
-1 S
tone
ville
ST
5288
B2F
4.
91.
1681
.930
.28.
23
77.4
8.4
31-1
,31-
2 N
exG
en N
G40
12 B
2RF
4.7
1.14
82.4
32.7
7.5
276
.99.
031
-1,3
1-3
Phy
toG
en P
HY
565
WR
F 3.
81.
1382
.331
.48.
81
77.3
10.0
12-1
,21-
2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
160B
2F
4.2
1.18
82.5
31.2
6.8
179
.48.
021
-2,3
1-1
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 4.
41.
1182
.130
.37.
92
78.1
8.3
31-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
367
WR
F 4.
61.
1582
.232
.69.
22
77.3
9.0
31-1
,31-
3 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 4
99W
RF
4.7
1.14
82.7
32.2
9.8
278
.68.
721
-1,3
1-1
Am
eric
ot A
M 1
532
B2R
F 4.
41.
1682
.030
.48.
42
77.5
8.7
21-2
,31-
3
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
12 B
2F
5.0
1.11
82.3
32.0
9.0
276
.28.
931
-3,3
1-4
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
180B
2F
4.6
1.15
83.1
32.4
8.0
178
.58.
331
-1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 4.
41.
1482
.931
.89.
21
77.2
8.6
31-1
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
4.
81.
1582
.731
.37.
51
78.1
9.0
21-2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
740B
2RF
4.7
1.10
82.2
31.0
8.1
178
.28.
721
-2,3
1-1
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 54
58B
2RF
5.0
1.14
81.1
32.9
7.8
276
.68.
931
-1,3
1-4
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
58
4.6
1.15
82.8
32.7
6.4
278
.68.
021
-2,3
1-2
Phy
toG
en P
HY
519
WR
F 4.
51.
1682
.131
.18.
83
77.3
8.8
31-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
4.7
1.16
82.4
31.4
8.1
375
.38.
831
-3,4
1-1
All-
Tex
AT
8122
0 B
2RF
4.8
1.16
82.6
31.2
8.6
276
.18.
731
-2,3
1-3
Del
tapi
ne D
P 12
1 R
F 4.
51.
1282
.831
.69.
32
78.4
8.4
31-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
4 B
2RF
4.3
1.11
82.4
32.4
9.1
374
.59.
131
-3,4
2-1
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
4.
91.
1281
.731
.28.
22
78.5
8.6
21-2
,31-
1 D
elta
pine
DP
1028
B2R
F 4.
41.
1382
.230
.09.
62
76.5
8.2
31-2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F
4.0
1.14
82.1
31.8
7.2
180
.48.
121
-2
30
Tabl
e 11
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
dry
land
uni
form
cot
ton
varie
ty te
st a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Lub
bock
201
0
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
210
CT
4.6
1.13
82.2
33.4
8.4
276
.48.
831
-1,3
2-2
All-
Tex
AT
Epic
B2R
F 3.
91.
1582
.529
.89.
41
79.0
9.3
21-1
,22-
1 N
exG
en N
G34
10 R
F 3.
91.
1682
.032
.27.
52
77.8
8.7
31-1
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
212
CT
4.7
1.14
82.2
32.6
8.3
179
.48.
521
-2,3
1-1
Nex
Gen
NG
2549
B2R
F 4.
41.
1283
.130
.78.
43
75.8
9.0
31-1
,32-
2
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 45
54B
2RF
4.9
1.14
82.4
32.2
9.8
276
.49.
331
-3 A
ll-Te
x A
T A
pex
B2R
F 4.
21.
1381
.429
.88.
71
77.5
9.2
21-4
,31-
3 A
ll-Te
x A
T 65
207
B2R
F 5.
11.
1383
.530
.49.
12
76.9
9.1
21-2
,31-
3 S
tone
ville
ST
4288
B2F
5.
11.
1482
.831
.38.
72
77.4
9.1
21-2
,31-
3 D
elta
pine
DP
174
RF
4.4
1.14
81.6
30.7
8.6
278
.59.
021
-1,3
1-1
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
4.7
1.14
82.4
32.9
7.5
278
.58.
621
-2,3
1-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 4.
71.
1682
.031
.98.
41
78.6
8.7
21-2
,31-
1 N
exG
en N
G40
10 B
2RF
4.6
1.19
82.8
34.0
8.3
178
.98.
921
-1,3
1-1
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
4.
31.
2182
.332
.86.
92
75.2
8.8
31-3
,41-
1 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
158
RF
4.0
1.14
81.3
30.5
8.3
276
.59.
522
-1,3
1-2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F 4.
51.
1581
.629
.18.
31
76.7
9.0
31-1
,31-
4 N
exG
en N
G33
48 B
2RF
4.0
1.13
82.2
30.9
7.9
376
.38.
921
-2,4
1-3
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
33 B
2RF
4.8
1.15
83.6
32.7
9.5
178
.48.
921
-1,3
1-3
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
773L
LB2
4.7
1.15
82.7
32.4
6.6
280
.08.
221
-1,3
1-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
72
4.7
1.22
83.4
36.7
7.9
177
.98.
831
-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 55
5BG
/RR
4.
11.
1280
.329
.77.
42
79.2
8.4
31-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
302
0 B
2RF
3.9
1.14
81.6
30.9
9.2
176
.48.
731
-1 D
elta
pine
DP
1032
B2R
F 4.
81.
1783
.331
.38.
12
76.0
8.6
31-2
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
4.6
1.16
82.5
30.6
8.9
178
.98.
821
-2 M
onsa
nto
10R
052B
2R2
4.3
1.18
83.7
31.8
9.6
177
.09.
031
-3
Mea
n4.
51.
1482
.331
.68.
42
77.6
8.8
c.v.
%6.
21.
70.
93.
15.
043
.51.
85.
1LS
D 0
.05
0.6
0.04
1.5
2.0
0.8
12.
90.
9
31
Table 12. Yield Summary of the dryland cotton variety test at Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock
Comp.Name 2005 2006 2008 2009 2010 Average Average*
FiberMax FM 958 984 379 1112 698 1261 887
Croplan Genetics CG 3035RF 626 1029 636 1297 897 919Croplan Genetics CG 3220B2RF 593 760 671 1020 761 783Croplan Genetics CG 3520B2RF 517 761 571 1506 839 861PhytoGen PHY 72 304 660 456 871 573 595
Americot AM 1532 B2RF 989 666 1351 1002 886Deltapine DP 121RF 938 619 1221 926 810FiberMax FM 1740 B2F 1002 681 1296 993 877FiberMax FM 9058 F 968 668 1485 1040 924FiberMax FM 9160 B2F 815 575 1411 934 818FiberMax FM 9180 B2F 814 565 1327 902 786NexGen NG3348 B2RF 843 609 979 810 694NexGen NG3410 RF 772 598 1094 821 705Seed Source Genetics SSG HQ 210 CT 1004 663 1126 931 815Stoneville ST 4554 B2RF 1159 584 1084 942 826Deltapine DP 121RF 1037 775 1294 1035 919
*Patterson, R.E. 1950. A method of adjustment for calculating comparable yields in variety tests.
Five Year Average
Four Year Average
Three Year Average
32
Table 13. Production information for dryland performance test at the AG-CARES farm, Lamesa, TX 2010.
Test: Uniform Variety Planting Date: May 19 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Trifluralin @ 1.3pt/A applied pre-plant Caparol @ 1.5 pt/A applied pre-plant Fertilizer: 20-10-0-5 @ 200 lbs/A applied pre-plant Rainfall: 17.2 inches during season Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting Harvest Date: November 1 Freeze Date: November 13
33
Tabl
e 14
. Res
ults
of t
he d
ryla
nd re
gion
al u
nifo
rm v
arie
ty te
st a
t the
AG
-CA
RES
farm
, Lam
esa
2010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/04/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
tM
onsa
nto
10R
052B
2R2
1128
31.3
41.2
40.8
34.3
5.4
9.2
6.6
33.5
535
30A
ll-Te
x A
T Ep
ic B
2RF
964
29.7
42.7
36.6
28.2
6.0
10.3
6.6
33.2
804
28Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
375
WR
F96
129
.045
.138
.729
.85.
49.
66.
930
.780
328
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 4
99W
RF
934
29.2
42.9
39.0
30.2
5.5
10.2
6.8
31.4
765
29St
onev
ille
ST 4
554B
2RF
925
29.9
45.1
37.1
28.5
5.7
10.6
6.8
31.3
644
26
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
303
5RF
924
29.6
42.7
39.5
30.8
5.6
9.8
6.7
33.2
734
28D
elta
pine
DP
121
RF
903
29.1
40.4
40.5
30.5
5.0
9.3
6.5
30.8
753
28St
onev
ille
ST 5
458B
2RF
869
28.4
46.3
34.9
28.1
5.7
9.8
6.2
32.0
784
27Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
569
WR
F86
426
.444
.237
.228
.54.
69.
15.
630
.684
328
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
44 B
2RF
845
28.4
44.8
36.8
29.5
5.0
9.6
5.9
31.0
735
25
Del
tapi
ne D
P 17
4 R
F83
830
.842
.040
.430
.75.
39.
87.
030
.673
428
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
830
29.9
44.6
39.5
29.7
5.0
9.4
6.4
31.3
784
28A
ll-Te
x A
T 65
207
B2R
F82
631
.046
.138
.429
.65.
29.
76.
232
.078
527
Del
tapi
ne D
P 55
5BG
/RR
816
31.2
43.6
36.6
29.2
4.9
7.5
5.3
33.5
766
27D
elta
pine
DP
1133
B2R
F80
831
.543
.040
.727
.54.
99.
36.
729
.774
428
Ston
evill
e ST
528
8B2F
807
27.8
41.0
38.6
29.8
4.9
8.5
5.8
32.6
806
27A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
220
B2R
F80
727
.245
.435
.327
.45.
39.
85.
733
.173
526
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 5
19W
RF
794
26.4
43.7
39.4
29.7
4.5
9.0
6.0
29.3
764
28Fi
berM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F79
329
.246
.137
.929
.44.
810
.26.
428
.279
525
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 3
67W
RF
791
27.7
46.5
37.3
28.1
4.8
9.5
6.1
29.8
734
26
Fibe
rMax
FM
174
0B2R
F78
730
.345
.038
.229
.45.
310
.36.
730
.175
525
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
4 B
2RF
776
24.9
49.9
33.6
26.4
6.2
11.2
5.9
35.4
795
24St
onev
ille
ST 4
288B
2F77
526
.746
.635
.126
.85.
310
.96.
230
.055
525
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 5
65W
RF
772
27.2
44.4
36.1
28.1
4.1
9.0
5.4
27.1
754
28B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
010B
2F77
027
.845
.736
.327
.95.
410
.66.
430
.578
427
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
37 B
2RF
768
31.3
42.7
40.6
30.8
5.5
9.6
6.7
33.3
705
30C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
520B
2RF
767
25.2
45.6
36.1
27.3
5.1
10.2
6.1
30.5
765
27D
elta
pine
DP
1028
B2R
F76
131
.844
.339
.328
.85.
39.
26.
332
.870
429
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F74
728
.147
.137
.228
.85.
510
.86.
630
.876
526
Seed
Sou
rce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
210
CT
704
30.1
49.3
37.0
29.0
4.9
8.8
5.3
33.8
645
21
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
34
Tabl
e 14
. Res
ults
of t
he d
ryla
nd re
gion
al u
nifo
rm v
arie
ty te
st a
t the
AG
-CA
RES
farm
, Lam
esa
2010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/04/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
Nex
Gen
NG
4010
B2R
F69
925
.844
.435
.326
.85.
010
.15.
830
.578
426
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
32B
2RF
698
28.9
43.3
39.4
29.9
4.7
8.7
6.0
30.8
764
28Se
ed S
ourc
e G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
12 C
T68
230
.849
.137
.028
.95.
49.
65.
834
.164
522
Nex
Gen
NG
4012
B2R
F67
628
.743
.336
.928
.55.
39.
96.
032
.268
526
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
668
27.7
42.4
38.4
29.4
5.3
10.1
6.5
31.4
745
26
Fibe
rMax
FM
905
8F66
727
.646
.134
.524
.85.
710
.86.
729
.670
626
Fibe
rMax
FM
958
652
27.3
44.1
36.8
19.3
5.4
10.8
6.5
30.8
766
25A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
158
RF
648
24.6
44.1
34.4
25.9
5.2
10.1
5.6
32.0
765
27D
elta
pine
DP
0912
B2F
636
27.6
44.5
35.1
29.3
5.5
9.8
6.3
30.4
734
28A
ll-Te
x A
T A
pex
B2R
F63
624
.742
.135
.226
.55.
09.
85.
631
.880
528
Fibe
rMax
FM
177
3LLB
262
425
.844
.734
.926
.75.
511
.36.
230
.565
525
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
261
826
.342
.336
.527
.95.
510
.16.
232
.565
526
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F59
923
.945
.535
.225
.74.
910
.35.
829
.678
528
Fibe
rMax
FM
184
5LLB
259
425
.042
.534
.527
.15.
712
.06.
630
.178
623
Am
eric
ot A
M 1
532
B2R
F58
726
.244
.834
.926
.35.
410
.76.
130
.976
530
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
584
29.5
47.3
39.5
29.9
4.9
9.3
6.4
30.3
765
26Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
72
561
26.6
45.7
33.2
26.3
6.2
11.0
6.3
32.5
684
25Fi
berM
ax F
M 9
180B
2F55
225
.445
.132
.725
.06.
011
.56.
530
.575
625
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
302
0B2R
F54
124
.044
.535
.627
.15.
510
.35.
833
.979
427
Fibe
rMax
FM
916
0B2F
527
28.2
43.5
37.8
29.9
5.2
9.7
6.1
31.9
816
23
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F49
825
.445
.132
.826
.35.
710
.05.
832
.673
623
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
496
21.7
41.9
32.2
24.3
5.5
11.5
5.7
30.7
745
26N
exG
en N
G34
10 R
F48
628
.246
.936
.117
.85.
510
.96.
431
.074
525
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
472
24.9
47.6
33.3
25.3
4.7
10.1
5.3
29.4
715
24N
exG
en N
G25
49 B
2RF
458
26.4
46.6
35.4
31.2
4.4
9.3
5.3
29.7
646
24
Mea
n72
527
.844
.636
.828
.35.
39.
96.
231
.373
526
c.v.
%26
.16.
06.
03.
45.
86.
85.
46.
16.
111
.914
.27.
3LS
D 0
.05
223
2.0
3.1
2.1
2.7
0.6
0.9
0.6
3.2
101
2
35
Tabl
e 14
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
dry
land
regi
onal
uni
form
var
iety
test
at t
he A
G-C
AR
ES fa
rm, L
ames
a 20
10
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Mon
sant
o 10
R05
2B2R
2 4.
81.
1382
.831
.310
.31
80.0
8.3
21-1
,21-
2 A
ll-Te
x A
T Ep
ic B
2RF
4.6
1.09
81.2
31.2
10.0
179
.98.
421
-1,3
1-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
375
WR
F 4.
11.
1281
.330
.99.
21
81.3
8.1
31-1
,21-
2 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 4
99W
RF
4.9
1.11
83.0
34.1
9.8
477
.97.
831
-1,3
1-2
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 45
54B
2RF
4.6
1.11
81.9
33.5
10.4
377
.38.
431
-1,3
1-2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
303
5RF
4.2
1.10
81.8
31.1
10.5
180
.68.
621
-1 D
elta
pine
DP
121
RF
4.9
1.11
81.9
31.5
9.4
279
.28.
221
-2,3
1-1
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 54
58B
2RF
4.6
1.10
81.2
33.5
8.4
477
.18.
331
-1,3
1-2
Phy
toG
en P
HY
569
WR
F 4.
71.
1283
.133
.310
.12
78.1
7.9
31-1
,31-
2 D
elta
pine
DP
1044
B2R
F 5.
01.
1182
.031
.49.
32
79.2
7.8
31-1
,31-
2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 17
4 R
F 4.
41.
1281
.730
.29.
72
80.1
8.3
21-2
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
4.6
1.10
82.1
29.7
10.1
280
.78.
021
-1,3
1-1
All-
Tex
AT
6520
7 B
2RF
4.3
1.10
81.6
30.8
9.5
279
.68.
621
-1,2
1-2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 55
5BG
/RR
4.
21.
1080
.230
.97.
42
82.1
7.0
21-2
,31-
1 D
elta
pine
DP
1133
B2R
F 4.
91.
1383
.233
.69.
31
79.8
8.1
21-1
,31-
1
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 52
88B
2F
4.9
1.10
81.5
30.3
8.7
479
.17.
531
-1,3
1-2
All-
Tex
AT
8122
0 B
2RF
4.6
1.11
81.7
31.4
8.3
279
.57.
921
-1,3
1-2
Phy
toG
en P
HY
519
WR
F 4.
51.
1282
.333
.09.
62
80.4
7.9
21-1
,31-
1 F
iber
Max
FM
917
0B2F
4.
41.
1582
.633
.57.
63
81.1
7.4
21-1
,31-
1 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 3
67W
RF
4.0
1.11
80.9
32.0
9.5
378
.58.
321
-2,3
1-2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
740B
2RF
4.8
1.10
82.3
32.1
8.5
280
.27.
531
-1 D
elta
pine
DP
104
B2R
F 4.
01.
1383
.133
.49.
63
79.8
8.1
21-1
,31-
1 S
tone
ville
ST
4288
B2F
4.
91.
1381
.632
.78.
93
79.1
8.3
21-2
,31-
1 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 5
65W
RF
4.2
1.13
81.9
33.9
9.4
379
.67.
631
-1 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
010B
2F
4.6
1.13
82.0
30.1
7.9
279
.97.
721
-1,3
1-2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
37 B
2RF
4.7
1.11
81.9
30.1
9.3
179
.48.
121
-2,3
1-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
352
0B2R
F 5.
01.
1583
.232
.89.
43
78.8
7.8
21-2
,31-
2 D
elta
pine
DP
1028
B2R
F 4.
21.
1383
.031
.210
.01
81.8
8.5
11-1
,21-
1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
220B
2RF
4.6
1.13
82.4
32.7
9.6
280
.38.
421
-1 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
10 C
T 4.
41.
1081
.333
.78.
71
81.2
7.7
21-1
,31-
1
36
Tabl
e 14
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
dry
land
regi
onal
uni
form
var
iety
test
at t
he A
G-C
AR
ES fa
rm, L
ames
a 20
10
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Nex
Gen
NG
4010
B2R
F 4.
01.
1281
.633
.48.
43
78.9
8.0
21-2
,31-
2 D
elta
pine
DP
1032
B2R
F 4.
51.
1282
.031
.38.
32
80.4
7.7
21-2
,31-
1 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
12 C
T 5.
11.
1281
.934
.18.
92
80.9
7.8
21-2
,31-
1 N
exG
en N
G40
12 B
2RF
4.4
1.10
80.4
32.4
7.6
278
.88.
031
-1 N
exG
en N
G41
11 R
F 4.
51.
1383
.035
.09.
32
79.9
8.6
21-1
,21-
2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
058F
4.
11.
1580
.831
.27.
33
81.6
7.7
11-1
,31-
2 F
iber
Max
FM
958
4.
71.
1482
.233
.56.
52
79.6
7.5
31-1
,31-
2 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
158
RF
4.6
1.10
83.2
32.7
9.2
379
.37.
731
-1,3
1-2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
12 B
2F
4.6
1.10
81.8
31.4
9.3
280
.68.
221
-1,2
1-2
All-
Tex
AT
Ape
x B
2RF
4.3
1.13
81.8
30.5
9.0
379
.07.
921
-2,3
1-2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
773L
LB2
4.5
1.14
82.1
35.0
7.4
281
.67.
621
-1,3
1-1
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 4.
31.
0880
.729
.87.
93
79.9
7.5
31-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F 3.
71.
1280
.730
.18.
92
81.0
7.9
21-1
,31-
1 F
iber
Max
FM
184
5LLB
2 4.
81.
1682
.834
.37.
34
79.3
7.5
31-1
,31-
2 A
mer
icot
AM
153
2 B
2RF
4.0
1.14
81.8
31.3
9.2
380
.77.
921
-1,3
1-1
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
4.
21.
1481
.631
.29.
23
78.5
8.3
11-1
,41-
1 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 7
2 4.
61.
1682
.135
.78.
32
78.9
8.5
21-2
,31-
1 F
iber
Max
FM
918
0B2F
4.
31.
1582
.633
.17.
93
81.1
7.6
21-1
,31-
2 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
020B
2RF
4.4
1.09
81.8
29.8
9.1
280
.37.
731
-1 F
iber
Max
FM
916
0B2F
4.
71.
1382
.731
.47.
32
79.0
7.5
31-1
,41-
1
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F 3.
71.
1080
.831
.27.
93
78.1
7.7
31-1
,41-
1 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
040B
2F
4.6
1.20
83.2
33.8
7.5
379
.18.
021
-2,3
1-1
Nex
Gen
NG
3410
RF
3.8
1.14
81.7
32.8
8.2
477
.97.
831
-1,3
1-2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
4.7
1.12
82.4
31.7
8.5
377
.17.
931
-1,3
1-2
Nex
Gen
NG
2549
B2R
F 4.
21.
0681
.231
.39.
83
77.5
8.1
31-1
,31-
2
Mea
n4.
41.
1281
.932
.18.
82
79.6
7.9
c.v.
%9.
21.
70.
92.
55.
745
.71.
94.
4LS
D 0
.05
0.8
0.04
1.4
1.6
1.0
23.
00.
7
37
Table 15. Yield summary of the dryland cotton variety test at the AG-CARES farm ,Lamesa
Comp.Name 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Average Average*
Croplan Genetics CG 3020B2F 195 1043 437 627 541 569Deltapine DP 555 BG/RR 201 1122 406 651 816 639FiberMax FM 958 165 1103 433 559 652 582FiberMax FM 9058F 191 1102 414 544 667 584PhytoGen PHY 72 118 1103 386 382 516 501
Croplan Genetics CG 3035RF 1363 500 676 924 846 746Croplan Genetics CG 3220B2RF 1169 486 584 747 746 646Croplan Genetics CG 3520B2RF 1029 455 660 767 715 615Croplan Genetics CG 4020B2RF 1037 435 559 599 677 577Deltapine DP 121 RF 1162 513 607 903 761 661FiberMax FM 1740B2F 1173 537 664 787 791 691FiberMax FM 9180B2F 1030 428 452 552 637 537
Americot AM 1532 B2RF 558 625 587 590 630FiberMax FM 9160B2F 404 635 527 522 562NexGen NG3348 B2RF 362 616 498 492 532NexGen NG3410 RF 422 493 486 467 507PhytoGen PHY 375WRF 527 678 961 722 762Seed Source Genetics SSG HQ 210 CT 405 605 704 571 611Stoneville ST 4554 B2RF 479 591 925 665 705Stoneville ST 5458 B2RF 536 652 869 686 726
*Patterson, R.E. A method of adjustment for calculating comparable yields in variety tests.
Three Year Average
Five Year Average
Four Year Average
38
Table 16. Yield summary for uniform cotton variety tests over five locations in 2010Overall Rank Rank Rank Rank Rank
Name Yield Lub Irr Lub Dry Lam Irr Lam Dry HalfwayDeltapine DP 1044 B2RF 1464 13 3 6 10 12Stoneville ST 5458B2RF 1457 1 21 3 8 21Croplan Genetics CG 3035RF 1443 2 18 12 6 3PhytoGen PHY 375WRF 1438 17 4 21 3 11PhytoGen PHY 367WRF 1432 16 13 5 20 10PhytoGen PHY 499WRF 1421 20 14 19 4 2Monsanto 10R052B2R2 1415 3 55 15 1 48NexGen NG4111 RF 1414 8 2 34 35 4PhytoGen PHY 569WRF 1380 46 6 7 9 20Stoneville ST 4554B2RF 1377 27 36 2 5 15All-Tex AT Epic B2RF 1373 7 32 8 2 25Deltapine DP 121 RF 1368 19 26 9 7 19Deltapine DP 555BG/RR 1358 5 51 31 14 26Detapine DP 1137 B2RF 1356 26 1 17 26 39Deltapine DP 0912 B2F 1345 11 16 28 39 7FiberMax FM 9058F 1343 50 7 32 36 1FiberMax FM 9160B2F 1331 25 11 4 50 32Deltapine DP 174 RF 1330 36 40 1 11 33FiberMax FM 1740B2RF 1330 18 20 27 21 17PhytoGen PHY565WRF 1325 14 10 16 24 50PhytoGen PHY 519WRF 1317 39 23 14 18 13Stoneville ST 5288B2F 1308 9 8 55 16 18FiberMax FM 958 1304 4 22 49 37 9Stoneville ST 4288B2F 1303 12 39 10 23 37Croplan Genetics CG 3220B2RF 1300 6 42 11 29 31FiberMax FM 9170B2F 1299 42 30 29 19 6Monsanto 09R348B2R2 1288 15 12 30 42 41All-Tex AT 65207 B2RF 1278 30 38 13 13 30All-Tex AT 81220 B2RF 1262 41 25 38 17 23Seed Source Genetics SSG HQ 210 CT 1261 10 31 48 30 14Croplan Genetics CG 3520B2RF 1259 53 5 45 27 28Bayer CropScience BCSX 1030B2F 1256 35 28 23 46 16Detapine DP 1133B2RF 1252 22 48 18 15 27NexGen NG4012 B2RF 1251 28 9 42 34 47Bayer CropScience BCSX 1010B2F 1248 32 19 35 25 49Deltapine DP 104 B2RF 1246 52 27 24 22 22Monsanto 09R637R2 1227 45 54 37 12 44Americot AM 1532 B2RF 1226 44 15 22 45 43Deltapine DP 1028 B2RF 1223 23 29 26 28 54FiberMax FM 9180B2F 1221 40 17 41 48 29All-Tex AT Apex B2RF 1211 38 37 20 40 34Croplan Genetics CGX 1001B2RF 1211 48 24 46 54 8Deltapine DP 1032B2RF 1209 31 53 40 32 45NexGen NG4010 B2RF 1207 24 43 36 31 36NexGen NG2549 B2RF 1202 29 35 47 55 5Seed Source Genetics SSG HQ 212 CT 1151 33 34 53 33 40Croplan Genetics CG 4020B2RF 1134 49 46 39 43 42Croplan Genetics CG 3020 B2RF 1132 54 52 25 49 51NexGen NG3410 RF 1128 55 33 33 53 38FiberMax FM 1773LLB2 1118 21 49 54 41 35FiberMax FM 1845LLB2 1108 47 41 44 44 53PhytoGen PHY 72 1105 37 50 52 47 24NexGen NG3348 B2RF 1094 43 47 43 51 52All-Tex AT 81158 RF 1089 34 45 50 38 55Bayer CropScience BCSX 1040B2F 1065 51 44 51 52 46
39
NOTES
40
Table 17. Production information for furrow irrigated performance test at the Dale Swinburn farm, Tulia, TX 2010.
Test: Cotton Variety Planting Date: May 5 Row Spacing: 30 in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Pre-plant incorporated Fertilizer: Feedlot manure @ 10 tons/A Irrigations: Furrow irrigated 1-2 times during season Insecticide: Temik @ 3.5 lbs/A at planting Harvest Aids: yes Harvest Date: November 4 Freeze Date: November 13
41
Tabl
e 18
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed c
otto
n va
riety
test
at t
he D
ale
Swin
burn
farm
, Tul
ia 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l09
/28/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t F
iber
Max
FM
917
0B2F
16
9029
.546
.837
.731
.35.
010
.26.
429
.639
434
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
1549
28.0
43.1
39.2
32.1
5.1
10.4
6.9
29.0
304
36 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 15
4029
.943
.839
.832
.85.
49.
96.
732
.053
536
All-
Tex
AT
8122
7 B
2RF
1528
27.3
47.0
35.9
29.2
4.8
9.2
5.4
32.3
545
34 F
iber
Max
FM
918
0B2F
15
2826
.145
.036
.228
.95.
111
.06.
428
.930
533
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
740B
2RF
1502
28.8
45.2
38.9
32.0
5.2
10.1
6.7
30.5
544
33 M
onsa
nto
09R
348B
2R2
1497
27.3
43.7
37.1
30.4
5.1
10.3
6.4
29.4
334
35 F
iber
Max
FM
916
0B2F
14
9427
.644
.636
.630
.55.
210
.06.
031
.538
535
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
210
CT
1489
28.3
47.1
34.9
28.8
5.1
9.4
5.2
33.7
295
34 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
12 C
T 14
8227
.347
.335
.329
.35.
39.
45.
335
.638
434
Phy
toG
en P
HY
375
WR
F 14
6728
.242
.038
.731
.84.
99.
86.
429
.748
335
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
1464
25.5
45.4
33.7
27.4
5.3
11.2
5.9
30.2
234
34 S
tone
ville
ST
5288
B2F
14
6427
.546
.036
.329
.64.
79.
45.
530
.633
434
Phy
toG
en P
HY
367W
RF
1463
25.1
41.4
39.1
32.2
4.7
9.6
6.3
28.5
364
35 D
elta
pine
DP
104
B2R
F 14
6225
.249
.133
.227
.55.
011
.05.
629
.056
533
Nex
Gen
NG
3410
RF
1460
27.4
49.9
37.8
30.7
5.2
10.7
6.7
29.0
305
34 M
onsa
nto
09R
637R
2 14
4627
.843
.038
.731
.14.
69.
56.
228
.343
434
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
28 B
2RF
1403
29.6
41.7
42.7
33.8
4.7
8.9
6.7
30.3
335
37 D
elta
pine
DP
1032
B2R
F 14
0128
.641
.139
.431
.94.
89.
36.
130
.945
434
Mon
sant
o 09
R53
2B2R
2 13
7425
.745
.934
.128
.04.
610
.85.
926
.550
434
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
13
5827
.443
.638
.431
.04.
89.
46.
030
.965
533
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
12 B
2RF
1349
27.5
44.3
37.2
30.5
5.1
10.0
6.2
30.4
364
33 L
BB
08-
10-7
06-V
13
4025
.046
.235
.928
.75.
210
.35.
931
.740
534
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
773L
LB2
1332
25.2
46.8
33.5
27.0
5.7
11.4
6.0
32.0
335
36 N
exG
en N
G25
49 R
F 13
2424
.946
.033
.827
.24.
610
.25.
428
.843
634
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
34B
2RF
1323
28.6
41.2
38.5
30.7
4.5
8.8
5.7
30.0
335
35 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
010B
2F
1322
27.5
46.5
34.6
28.4
5.2
11.0
6.0
30.0
503
36 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 4
020B
2RF
1322
25.8
46.4
35.7
28.6
5.0
10.1
5.9
30.3
514
35 S
tone
ville
ST
4288
B2F
13
0725
.444
.737
.430
.75.
110
.66.
529
.438
433
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
1305
24.1
43.9
34.5
28.1
4.3
10.1
5.5
27.1
584
34
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
42
Tabl
e 18
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed c
otto
n va
riety
test
at t
he D
ale
Swin
burn
farm
, Tul
ia 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l09
/28/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
13
0323
.447
.233
.327
.14.
911
.55.
927
.445
534
LB
B 0
8-10
-602
-V
1262
24.8
50.2
33.2
27.9
5.0
10.9
5.7
29.2
286
36 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
520B
2RF
1245
24.6
43.4
36.9
29.1
4.5
10.5
6.3
26.6
494
33 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
220B
2RF
1243
25.4
42.4
37.3
30.4
5.0
10.7
6.6
28.6
404
35 N
exG
en N
G15
51 R
F 11
5822
.146
.535
.628
.75.
111
.46.
627
.441
334
Mea
n14
0526
.645
.136
.629
.84.
910
.26.
129
.841
434
c.v.
%8.
36.
65.
82.
93.
04.
22.
74.
04.
329
.714
.03.
3LS
D 0
.05
163
2.5
3.6
2.2
1.8
0.4
0.6
0.5
2.6
171
2
43
Tabl
e 18
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
irrig
ated
cot
ton
varie
ty te
st a
t the
Dal
e Sw
inbu
rn fa
rm, T
ulia
201
0
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F
3.7
1.20
81.7
31.3
7.4
278
.98.
331
-1 N
exG
en N
G41
11 R
F 4.
11.
1482
.132
.68.
93
77.1
9.4
21-3
,32-
1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 4.
11.
1281
.930
.29.
52
78.8
9.5
11-4
,21-
1 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
227
B2R
F 4.
31.
1880
.632
.67.
73
78.3
8.7
21-1
,31-
1 F
iber
Max
FM
918
0B2F
4.
21.
1781
.532
.47.
72
79.9
8.6
21-1
,31-
1
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
740B
2RF
4.3
1.16
81.8
31.5
8.0
279
.48.
721
-1,2
1-2
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 3.
61.
1581
.029
.97.
93
78.4
8.2
31-1
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
160B
2F
3.6
1.18
81.9
32.1
7.1
279
.88.
821
-1 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
10 C
T3.
71.
1179
.931
.58.
41
79.4
8.8
21-1
,21-
2 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG H
Q 2
12 C
T 3.
71.
1279
.731
.58.
81
79.0
9.2
21-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
375
WR
F 4.
01.
1281
.229
.08.
53
76.9
9.5
21-3
,32-
1 F
iber
Max
FM
184
5LLB
2 4.
21.
2082
.333
.47.
32
76.7
8.7
31-1
,31-
2 S
tone
ville
ST
5288
B2F
4.
01.
1580
.730
.78.
52
79.5
9.2
21-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
367W
RF
3.7
1.03
85.4
28.6
9.4
376
.59.
621
-4,2
2-2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
4 B
2RF
4.0
1.13
82.0
32.3
9.4
378
.38.
921
-1,3
1-3
Nex
Gen
NG
3410
RF
3.5
1.17
81.4
32.3
8.0
478
.38.
921
-1,3
1-1
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
4.4
1.10
80.3
28.1
10.1
179
.110
.011
-4 D
elta
pine
DP
1028
B2R
F 4.
31.
1481
.829
.39.
62
77.0
9.9
21-3
,22-
2 D
elta
pine
DP
1032
B2R
F 4.
11.
1580
.530
.58.
12
78.0
9.6
21-3
Mon
sant
o 09
R53
2B2R
2 4.
31.
1681
.932
.28.
54
76.3
8.4
31-3
,41-
1
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
3.
81.
1380
.729
.28.
83
78.7
9.3
21-1
,21-
3 D
elta
pine
DP
0912
B2R
F 4.
41.
1481
.731
.38.
73
77.9
9.4
21-3
,21-
4 L
BB
08-
10-7
06-V
3.
51.
1781
.933
.58.
23
79.0
9.1
21-1
,21-
4 F
iber
Max
FM
177
3LLB
2 3.
91.
2081
.333
.27.
11
79.6
8.9
21-1
,21-
2 N
exG
en N
G25
49 R
F 3.
61.
0882
.131
.69.
23
77.9
8.9
21-2
,31-
3
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
34B
2RF
3.8
1.15
81.2
29.7
9.7
375
.99.
811
-4,3
2-2
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
4.
01.
1680
.831
.27.
22
76.9
9.8
21-4
,22-
1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 4
020B
2RF
4.0
1.18
81.4
30.1
8.4
278
.19.
321
-3,2
1-4
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 42
88B
2F
4.1
1.13
80.8
30.3
8.5
377
.69.
421
-3,3
1-3
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
4.1
1.18
82.5
31.0
9.0
477
.18.
531
-1
44
Tabl
e 18
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
irrig
ated
cot
ton
varie
ty te
st a
t the
Dal
e Sw
inbu
rn fa
rm, T
ulia
201
0
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
4.
21.
2181
.732
.87.
43
76.7
8.9
31-3
LB
B 0
8-10
-602
-V
3.6
1.19
81.5
33.3
7.3
278
.79.
221
-1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
520B
2RF
4.0
1.15
80.8
29.6
8.9
276
.59.
822
-1,2
2-2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 3.
81.
1580
.630
.99.
22
77.4
9.7
21-3
,22-
1 N
exG
en N
G15
51 R
F 4.
31.
1181
.732
.98.
12
76.7
9.4
22-2
,31-
1
Mea
n3.
91.
1581
.431
.28.
42
77.8
9.1
c.v.
%5.
63.
01.
32.
94.
639
.31.
52.
8LS
D 0
.05
0.5
0.07
2.7
1.8
0.8
22.
40.
5
45
NOTES
46
Table 19. Production information for furrow irrigated performance test at Texas AgriLife Research, Pecos, TX 2010.
Test: Regional Cotton Variety Planting Date: May 1 Row Spacing: 34-42in variable (equivalent to 38in) Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Prowl @ 2pt/A applied pre-plant Fertilizer: none Irrigations: 11.3 acre-in May 11 4.6 acre-in June 14 4.0 acre-in June 28 4.3 acre-in July 26 4.8 acre-in August 11 4.0 acre-in August 25 37 acre-in
4.0 acre-in September 1
Rainfall: May-October = 11.03 inches Insecticide: none Fungicide: none Harvest Aids: Folex @ 1pt/A and ethephon @ 1pt/A applied November 4 Gramoxone @ 1pt/A applied November 16 Harvest Date: November 19 Freeze Date: November 26
47
Tabl
e 20
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed re
gion
al c
otto
n va
riety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, P
ecos
201
0
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l11
/11/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t06
NM
M02
414
8928
.139
.540
.629
.54.
89.
77.
027
.685
528
Ston
evill
e ST
428
8B2F
1212
24.3
42.2
34.6
24.1
4.4
11.0
6.2
24.5
953
25LB
B 0
7-7-
1407
-CT
1201
30.9
41.4
38.0
28.9
4.6
9.4
6.2
28.0
935
26St
onev
ille
ST 5
458B
2F11
6730
.844
.135
.526
.74.
79.
95.
928
.193
325
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
1162
27.2
45.7
35.5
25.8
5.2
10.9
6.4
29.1
954
27
NM
05N
1104
1103
27.2
44.0
36.7
27.5
4.4
9.4
5.9
27.1
904
28St
onev
ille
ST 5
288B
2F10
9127
.443
.037
.827
.94.
49.
66.
426
.295
428
Fibe
rMax
FM
174
0B2R
F10
6927
.541
.839
.629
.64.
89.
86.
927
.893
427
LBB
06-4
5-11
04-D
1062
26.8
39.4
40.7
28.9
4.4
9.2
6.5
27.3
936
30D
elta
pine
DP
1137
B2R
F10
4832
.742
.138
.728
.54.
69.
36.
327
.990
425
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
12B
2RF
1040
27.4
41.2
43.5
32.0
4.4
9.0
6.5
27.5
904
26B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
010B
2F10
3628
.140
.839
.028
.34.
39.
26.
326
.595
426
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 7
55W
RF
1025
27.3
41.5
38.5
28.7
4.2
8.7
5.9
27.3
935
28D
elta
pine
DP
1050
B2R
F10
2428
.540
.540
.929
.44.
710
.57.
525
.893
324
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 3
75W
RF
1017
28.2
39.9
38.6
28.7
4.1
8.9
6.0
26.0
855
24
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F10
1529
.245
.636
.727
.64.
910
.26.
527
.690
424
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 5
65W
RF
999
24.1
43.2
34.4
25.6
4.8
10.6
5.9
27.9
934
24C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
220B
2RF
981
26.2
37.5
40.3
31.5
4.4
8.5
6.2
28.2
954
27N
M03
012
979
29.3
45.0
37.5
29.5
4.8
9.1
5.8
31.0
904
30C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
520B
2RF
977
28.6
42.8
40.2
30.1
4.0
7.8
5.6
28.4
934
27
Fibe
rMax
FM
916
0B2F
976
25.5
41.8
37.5
27.3
4.8
10.3
6.6
26.3
954
30C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F97
024
.542
.735
.827
.15.
411
.06.
728
.988
429
LBB
07-2
1-30
9-P
961
26.4
42.4
39.1
28.8
4.3
8.9
6.3
27.2
954
27Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
569
WR
F94
324
.844
.235
.326
.05.
110
.66.
329
.093
424
Ston
evill
e ST
455
4B2R
F93
627
.244
.034
.024
.84.
911
.36.
426
.193
330
Del
tapi
ne D
P 16
1B2R
F91
924
.541
.235
.525
.54.
710
.26.
027
.688
427
Fibe
rMax
FM
177
3LLB
291
829
.743
.637
.627
.85.
010
.56.
528
.288
425
Fibe
rMax
FM
918
0B2F
917
26.7
42.9
37.2
28.1
4.2
8.6
5.7
27.6
934
2506
NM
M01
088
926
.940
.538
.728
.84.
38.
55.
928
.193
425
Fibe
rMax
FM
917
0B2F
888
22.5
42.0
35.9
25.7
4.7
10.7
6.5
25.9
935
25
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
48
Tabl
e 20
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed re
gion
al c
otto
n va
riety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, P
ecos
201
0
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l11
/11/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
Del
tapi
ne D
P 55
5BG
/RR
879
24.6
38.7
38.2
29.0
4.0
8.8
5.9
26.1
955
27Fi
berM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
859
28.6
44.2
35.8
26.9
4.8
10.0
6.0
28.3
903
24M
onsa
nto
10R
052B
2R2
855
28.5
45.4
36.8
27.8
4.5
10.1
6.3
26.1
884
26Fi
berM
ax F
M 9
058F
850
27.4
43.8
37.2
29.2
4.5
9.6
6.1
26.8
885
25D
elta
pine
DP
1032
B2R
F85
028
.040
.434
.324
.84.
59.
25.
230
.395
427
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 7
282
727
.442
.936
.326
.54.
610
.86.
625
.388
424
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
826
25.4
42.8
35.6
27.4
4.8
9.9
5.9
29.4
884
26Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
499
WR
F82
123
.140
.339
.628
.74.
59.
46.
627
.295
427
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 5
19W
RF
818
27.8
42.3
36.5
26.9
4.6
10.7
6.5
26.0
954
28D
elta
pine
DP
1133
B2R
F81
328
.842
.238
.128
.84.
69.
76.
527
.393
425
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
48B
2RF
789
23.1
44.5
34.6
23.9
5.2
12.0
6.7
26.9
955
23LB
B 0
6-46
-266
-P77
125
.741
.637
.427
.94.
29.
05.
926
.795
323
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
766
27.2
47.2
36.2
31.2
4.8
10.7
6.4
27.1
884
25D
elta
pine
DP
1044
B2R
F72
326
.141
.238
.628
.24.
39.
56.
226
.690
425
Nex
Gen
NG
4010
B2F
705
28.4
41.0
40.1
29.4
4.4
8.7
6.2
28.2
884
27
Mea
n95
927
.142
.337
.527
.94.
69.
76.
327
.491
426
c.v.
%22
.29.
26.
37.
79.
79.
810
.88.
57.
65.
419
.210
.6LS
D 0
.05
359
4.2
4.4
4.9
4.6
0.8
1.8
0.9
3.5
81
4
49
Table 21. Yield summary of the irrigated cotton variety test at Texas AgriLife Research, Pecos
Comp.Name 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Average Average*
Croplan Genetics CG 4020B2RF 1108 946 951 767 1015 957Deltapine 555 BG/RR 1360 1031 1358 727 879 1071PhytoGen PHY 72 1264 1119 1115 884 827 1042
Croplan Genetics CG 3220B2RF 1224 1175 942 981 1081 1113
FiberMax 9058F 1209 859 850 973 1049FiberMax FM 9160B2F 1166 857 976 1000 1076NM 03012 1132 861 979 991 1067PhytoGen PHY 375WRF 1416 1118 1017 1184 1260PhytoGen PHY 755WRF 1100 954 1025 1026 1102Stoneville ST 4288 B2F 990 1035 1212 1079 1155Stoneville ST 4554 B2RF 1079 784 936 933 1009Stoneville ST 5288 B2F 1134 698 1091 974 1050Stoneville ST 5458 B2F 1182 1101 1167 1150 1226
* Patterson, R.E. A method of adjustment for calculating comparable yields in variety tests.
Three Year Average
Five Year Average
Four Year Average
50
Table 22. Production information for furrow irrigated performance test at Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock, TX 2010.
Test: Late Planted Variety Planting Date: June 10 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Prowl @ 1 qt/A applied pre plant Caparol @ 1.2qt/A and Dual @ 1.3pt/A applied May 12 Fertilizer: 120-20-0 lbs/A applied pre-plant Irrigations: 2.5 acre inches June 10 1.4 acre inches August 5 Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting Telone II fumigant (for nematodes) applied April 6 Harvest Date: November 22 Freeze Date: November 13
51
Tabl
e 23
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed la
te p
lant
ed v
arie
ty te
st a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Lub
bock
201
0
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/25/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 3
67W
RF
1276
29.2
43.2
39.8
31.2
5.7
9.6
6.6
34.5
863
28 D
elta
pine
DP
104
B2R
2 12
5727
.247
.034
.427
.76.
511
.16.
235
.991
628
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
740B
2RF
1242
29.2
41.9
39.7
31.1
6.0
10.6
7.4
32.2
895
26 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
220B
2RF
1132
27.6
42.4
38.1
30.3
6.4
11.1
7.3
33.3
804
30 M
onsa
nto
09R
637R
2 10
9929
.042
.540
.330
.66.
09.
66.
835
.674
426
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 10
8831
.140
.141
.233
.26.
310
.67.
932
.879
529
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 42
88B
2F
1077
27.8
43.4
38.0
30.4
6.8
10.9
7.0
36.7
815
26 M
onsa
nto
09R
532B
2R2
1070
26.0
44.0
35.4
27.8
5.2
11.1
6.6
27.8
883
28 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 10
6929
.142
.339
.831
.66.
19.
97.
034
.979
429
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
402
0B2R
F 10
6227
.341
.437
.729
.35.
910
.26.
534
.384
430
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
28 B
2RF
1062
29.3
38.8
41.8
32.6
5.5
8.6
6.5
35.3
784
31 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 3
75W
RF
1062
28.7
40.9
40.1
31.5
5.8
10.1
7.2
32.4
843
30 N
exG
en N
G33
48 B
2RF
1039
27.3
44.5
36.4
28.6
6.1
11.3
7.0
31.9
886
28 M
onsa
nto
10R
011B
2R2
1007
30.4
41.3
40.4
31.6
6.0
9.3
6.8
36.0
754
27 N
exG
en N
G34
10 R
F 10
0726
.142
.237
.429
.86.
511
.77.
532
.383
628
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
180B
2F
996
26.9
42.8
36.8
28.2
6.0
11.1
6.9
32.2
886
25 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
520B
2RF
986
26.8
41.4
39.8
29.9
5.2
9.8
6.6
31.2
853
28 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
GX
100
1B2R
F 92
025
.843
.135
.827
.65.
010
.46.
229
.289
427
LB
B 0
8-10
-706
-V
890
25.9
46.1
34.7
27.2
6.7
12.1
6.7
34.5
905
25 L
BB
08-
10-6
02-V
80
123
.847
.333
.026
.35.
712
.36.
528
.889
624
Mea
n10
5727
.742
.838
.029
.85.
910
.56.
833
.184
427
c.v.
%15
.34.
53.
43.
33.
45.
22.
94.
85.
74.
412
.85.
0LS
D 0
.05
229
1.8
2.1
2.6
2.1
0.6
0.6
0.7
4.0
51
2
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
52
Tabl
e 23
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
irrig
ated
late
pla
nted
var
iety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, L
ubbo
ck 2
010
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Phy
toG
en P
HY
367
WR
F 4.
51.
1382
.531
.88.
91
78.3
9.2
21-1
,21-
2 D
elta
pine
DP
104
B2R
2 4.
31.
1182
.132
.09.
13
79.4
8.4
21-2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
740B
2RF
4.8
1.09
81.7
29.9
8.7
280
.78.
521
-1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
220B
2RF
4.8
1.13
82.6
31.8
9.7
179
.68.
821
-1 M
onsa
nto
09R
637R
2 4.
61.
1082
.729
.710
.81
79.8
8.8
21-1
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 4.
31.
0881
.028
.98.
12
80.0
7.8
31-1
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 42
88B
2F
5.0
1.11
81.9
31.0
9.2
178
.58.
531
-1 M
onsa
nto
09R
532B
2R2
4.7
1.15
83.1
32.7
8.5
377
.77.
631
-2 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 4.
41.
1282
.130
.510
.31
79.4
8.8
21-1
,21-
2 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 4
020B
2RF
4.4
1.14
81.7
29.5
9.0
179
.98.
821
-1,2
1-2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
28 B
2RF
4.4
1.12
82.0
29.5
9.9
180
.88.
621
-1 P
hyto
Gen
PH
Y 3
75W
RF
4.7
1.11
82.1
30.2
8.8
178
.98.
721
-2,3
1-1
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F 4.
31.
1382
.731
.58.
52
78.5
8.3
31-1
Mon
sant
o 10
R01
1B2R
2 4.
71.
1481
.931
.98.
92
80.5
8.3
21-1
Nex
Gen
NG
3410
RF
3.9
1.19
83.1
33.6
7.7
278
.98.
321
-2,3
1-1
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
180B
2F
4.5
1.16
82.9
33.5
7.4
180
.97.
721
-2,3
1-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
352
0B2R
F 4.
71.
1181
.630
.09.
62
78.8
8.7
21-1
,31-
1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
GX
100
1B2R
F 4.
91.
1482
.230
.58.
73
77.9
8.3
31-1
,31-
2 L
BB
08-
10-7
06-V
3.
81.
1582
.033
.97.
92
79.7
8.4
21-1
,31-
1 L
BB
08-
10-6
02-V
4.
01.
1983
.133
.77.
72
80.5
8.2
21-1
,21-
2
Mea
n4.
51.
1382
.231
.38.
82
79.4
8.4
c.v.
%4.
51.
80.
82.
84.
735
.20.
83.
0LS
D 0
.05
0.4
0.04
1.3
1.8
0.9
11.
30.
5
53
NOTES
54
Table 24. Production information for furrow irrigated performance test at Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock, TX 2010.
Test: New Variety and Strains Planting Date: May 11 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Prowl @ 1 qt/A applied pre plant Caparol @ 1.2qt/A and Dual Magnum @ 1.3pt/A applied May 12 Fertilizer: 120-20-0 lbs/A applied pre-plant Irrigations: 1.0 acre inches July 21 1.4 acre inches August 5 Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting Telone II fumigant (for nematodes) applied April 6 Harvest Aids: Gramoxone @ 32 oz/A + ½% crop oil applied November 3 Harvest Date: November 22 Freeze Date: November 13
55
Tabl
e 25
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed n
ew v
arie
ties a
nd st
rain
s tes
t at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, L
ubbo
ck 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/13/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t A
ll-Te
x A
TX L
A12
2 15
8226
.339
.836
.828
.26.
010
.66.
633
.371
531
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
37 B
2RF
1496
30.6
41.8
38.9
29.8
6.2
10.5
7.2
33.5
806
33 A
ll-Te
x A
TX 7
A21
14
9327
.840
.838
.728
.96.
610
.97.
334
.885
230
Mon
sant
o 10
R05
2B2R
2 14
7030
.439
.141
.032
.16.
39.
67.
235
.669
535
Phy
toG
en P
HX
4299
WR
F 14
6826
.244
.036
.929
.65.
39.
86.
131
.778
432
All-
Tex
AT
8115
9 R
F 14
0224
.639
.837
.929
.96.
610
.97.
036
.092
531
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
13
9127
.445
.137
.128
.66.
511
.67.
233
.789
432
Mon
sant
o 09
R53
2B2R
2 13
8225
.443
.534
.527
.65.
310
.86.
129
.898
432
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
1352
28.9
42.4
38.4
30.0
5.6
9.8
6.3
31.2
765
32 A
ll-Te
x A
T 91
437-
2 B
2RF
1325
29.4
43.5
38.3
29.4
5.9
10.3
6.8
33.3
937
31
All-
Tex
AT
8114
4 B
2RF
1314
27.8
41.9
34.4
27.2
6.5
13.3
7.7
29.5
815
30 N
exG
en N
GX
582
B2R
F 13
0824
.244
.135
.228
.07.
612
.27.
137
.595
531
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
180B
2F
1231
24.6
42.0
36.9
28.6
7.0
10.9
7.2
35.7
956
28 A
ll-Te
x A
T 65
984
B2R
F 12
2129
.043
.838
.931
.86.
310
.46.
935
.291
531
06N
MM
024B
2RF
1199
26.3
44.2
35.9
27.6
6.9
11.4
6.9
36.2
865
30
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 11
9526
.840
.837
.228
.57.
311
.57.
436
.977
631
NM
05N
1104
11
5225
.442
.734
.726
.86.
513
.17.
331
.271
432
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
11
4622
.542
.833
.026
.35.
911
.26.
033
.085
530
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
11
3827
.642
.238
.128
.55.
910
.67.
032
.488
531
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
1137
24.4
42.6
32.8
25.8
5.4
11.4
6.3
28.5
965
31
All-
Tex
AT
8122
7 B
2RF
1122
26.5
42.3
36.9
29.5
6.4
11.0
6.8
34.9
767
31 L
BB
07-
21-3
11-P
11
1123
.744
.336
.727
.96.
811
.67.
135
.185
629
Phy
toG
en P
HX
3099
WR
F 11
0425
.942
.838
.229
.56.
211
.07.
232
.969
529
NM
0301
2 10
9624
.744
.034
.927
.56.
812
.06.
934
.381
430
LB
B 0
5-47
-802
-D
1081
24.3
43.0
35.7
26.5
7.1
13.2
7.8
32.1
836
29
06N
MM
010B
2RF
1024
25.7
42.6
36.4
28.9
6.8
11.8
7.1
34.7
855
31 L
BB
08-
10-7
06-V
94
921
.842
.433
.525
.96.
411
.05.
936
.984
628
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
58
941
23.8
38.9
35.0
27.1
7.0
12.9
7.6
32.5
686
28 S
eed
Sour
ce G
enet
ics S
SG 5
9-6-
9 90
124
.344
.634
.526
.96.
811
.16.
237
.675
230
LB
B 0
8-10
-602
-V
888
22.7
46.5
31.4
24.3
6.2
12.4
6.0
32.4
807
29
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
56
Tabl
e 25
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed n
ew v
arie
ties a
nd st
rain
s tes
t at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, L
ubbo
ck 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l10
/13/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
t
All-
Tex
AT
9133
9-8
B2R
F 86
022
.941
.235
.126
.56.
711
.46.
735
.343
631
Mea
n12
0925
.942
.536
.228
.26.
311
.36.
833
.881
531
c.v.
%16
.06.
85.
64.
45.
97.
76.
08.
46.
723
.036
.57.
2LS
D 0
.05
299
2.5
3.4
3.3
3.4
1.0
1.4
1.4
4.7
263
3
All-
Tex
6590
3 B
2RF,
All-
Tex
AT
9122
4-91
B2R
F, D
elta
pine
113
3B2R
F, a
nd M
onsa
nto
10R
011B
2R2
wer
e dr
oppe
d du
e to
stan
d lo
ss
57
Tabl
e 25
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
irrig
ated
new
var
ietie
s and
stra
ins t
est a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Lub
bock
201
0
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
All-
Tex
ATX
LA
122
3.8
1.05
85.7
28.0
9.3
278
.49.
121
-3,3
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
37 B
2RF
4.5
1.13
82.6
29.8
8.6
277
.68.
431
-1,3
1-2
All-
Tex
ATX
7A
21
4.5
1.14
82.6
31.2
8.2
277
.78.
921
-2 M
onsa
nto
10R
052B
2R2
4.7
1.12
82.3
29.6
9.6
178
.08.
921
-4,3
1-1
Phy
toG
en P
HX
4299
WR
F 4.
91.
1883
.832
.89.
02
78.3
8.3
31-1
All-
Tex
AT
8115
9 R
F 4.
01.
1681
.732
.17.
72
77.6
8.4
31-1
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
4.
11.
1781
.730
.57.
91
77.7
8.8
31-1
,31-
3 M
onsa
nto
09R
532B
2R2
4.7
1.16
83.4
32.4
8.1
475
.27.
941
-1 M
onsa
nto
09R
637R
2 4.
61.
1383
.130
.29.
91
77.7
8.2
21-1
,41-
1 A
ll-Te
x A
T 91
437-
2 B
2RF
3.9
1.19
82.1
31.4
8.6
178
.29.
221
-2,2
1-4
All-
Tex
AT
8114
4 B
2RF
4.1
1.21
83.6
34.5
8.8
377
.48.
921
-3,3
1-2
Nex
Gen
NG
X58
2 B
2RF
4.3
1.19
83.2
32.6
7.2
377
.68.
731
-1 F
iber
Max
FM
918
0B2F
4.
61.
1583
.232
.67.
21
79.1
8.2
31-1
All-
Tex
AT
6598
4 B
2RF
5.1
1.14
82.6
32.7
8.3
176
.68.
831
-1,3
1-3
06N
MM
024B
2RF
3.8
1.24
83.0
35.5
9.0
276
.68.
731
-1,3
1-2
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 3.
51.
1180
.828
.37.
82
78.0
8.7
21-4
,31-
1 N
M05
N11
04
4.5
1.21
83.1
33.4
8.2
177
.68.
631
-1 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
040B
2F
4.4
1.23
83.3
32.2
7.2
475
.88.
331
-2,4
1-1
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
4.
11.
1480
.928
.98.
41
76.9
8.5
21-2
,41-
1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
GX
100
1B2R
F 4.
61.
1582
.630
.58.
43
77.2
8.2
31-1
,31-
2
All-
Tex
AT
8122
7 B
2RF
4.5
1.16
81.8
33.1
8.0
278
.77.
931
-1 L
BB
07-
21-3
11-P
3.
91.
1683
.032
.28.
51
76.9
9.1
22-2
,31-
2 P
hyto
Gen
PH
X 3
099W
RF
4.3
1.17
82.7
30.8
9.4
277
.98.
131
-1,3
1-2
NM
0301
2 4.
21.
1982
.935
.67.
62
77.8
8.5
31-1
,31-
2 L
BB
05-
47-8
02-D
4.
11.
1982
.833
.96.
23
78.0
7.9
31-1
,31-
2
06N
MM
010B
2RF
4.3
1.09
86.5
34.5
8.5
177
.19.
031
-1,3
1-3
LB
B 0
8-10
-706
-V
3.9
1.18
83.5
34.9
7.7
378
.08.
431
-1 F
iber
Max
FM
958
4.1
1.16
83.3
32.1
7.5
278
.88.
921
-1,2
1-2
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
59-
6-9
4.6
1.15
83.4
33.4
8.3
177
.98.
231
-1 L
BB
08-
10-6
02-V
3.
41.
1982
.134
.17.
62
79.5
8.1
31-1
58
Tabl
e 25
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
irrig
ated
new
var
ietie
s and
stra
ins t
est a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Lub
bock
201
0
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
All-
Tex
AT
9133
9-8
B2R
F 3.
51.
1881
.431
.08.
22
76.8
9.5
21-4
,22-
2 A
ll-Te
x A
T 65
903
B2R
F 4.
31.
1281
.128
.17.
91
79.0
9.1
21-1
,21-
3 A
ll-Te
x A
T 91
224-
91 B
2RF
3.8
1.11
81.3
28.4
8.7
378
.18.
521
-2,3
1-2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
33 B
2RF
4.6
1.20
82.0
35.2
8.2
278
.08.
831
-1 M
onsa
nto
10R
011B
2R2
4.8
1.12
80.9
29.8
8.0
177
.48.
631
-1
Mea
n4.
21.
1682
.731
.98.
22
77.7
8.5
c.v.
%8.
43.
72.
13.
97.
745
.51.
46.
3LS
D 0
.05
0.7
0.09
3.6
2.5
1.3
22.
21.
1
59
NOTES
60
Table 26. Production information for furrow irrigated performance test at Texas AgriLife Research, Halfway, TX 2010.
Test: Regional Breeders Strains Planting Date: May 6 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Triflurin @ 1 ½ pt/A applied pre plant Fertilizer: 120-0-0 lbs/A applied June 1 Irrigations: 2.4 acre inches June 24 2.8 acre inches August 3 2.0 acre inches August 24 Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting Harvest Aids: Super Boll @ 22oz/A and Def @8 oz/A applied October 4 Parazone @ 16oz/A and NIS at .05% Harvest Date: November 4 Freeze Date: November 13
61
Tabl
e 27
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed re
gion
al b
reed
ers s
train
s tes
t at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, H
alfw
ay 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erPl
ants
%
wilt
% w
iltD
efol
iatio
nD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
lpe
r foo
t8/
10/1
08/
30/1
09/
22/1
0Fi
berM
ax F
M 9
8914
8326
.545
.535
.426
.76.
311
.06.
434
.73.
597.
414
.61.
344
LA07
3071
1114
4331
.857
.234
.327
.55.
610
.25.
733
.34.
4114
.521
2.25
9A
rk 0
222-
1213
8727
.747
.436
.329
.16.
311
.26.
833
.64.
110
.521
.61.
674
Sure
Gro
w S
G 1
0513
6828
.049
.231
.824
.85.
611
.35.
831
.04.
5610
.917
.81.
509
Fibe
rMax
FM
958
1267
26.2
43.0
36.4
28.3
6.0
11.2
6.8
32.2
4.58
11.7
25.5
1.70
3
Ark
021
9-15
1263
25.7
42.1
35.4
28.3
6.7
12.0
7.0
34.8
3.51
13.7
28.3
1.98
2LB
B-0
7-21
-311
1213
23.8
45.4
31.4
24.8
6.2
11.6
5.7
34.0
4.09
7.7
17.2
1.63
9A
U60
0111
9925
.444
.334
.627
.36.
511
.36.
435
.03.
318
341.
66TA
M 0
3WZ-
3711
9823
.643
.732
.726
.66.
110
.75.
635
.55.
119.
516
.21.
737
LA07
3071
2211
9130
.242
.638
.029
.86.
010
.16.
634
.42.
3220
.841
.81.
727
LA06
3070
2511
8326
.641
.237
.329
.15.
510
.16.
431
.93.
239.
416
.31.
902
GA
200
7095
1167
27.0
45.1
34.5
27.2
6.2
10.5
5.9
35.7
2.53
13.3
321.
71A
rk 0
203-
1111
5826
.942
.837
.128
.65.
710
.36.
432
.92.
9516
.525
.21.
545
NM
06N
1166
1138
25.4
47.2
33.2
26.2
5.4
10.8
5.6
32.6
4.97
9.9
16.2
1.56
7PX
0320
2-65
-111
3523
.345
.236
.827
.75.
610
.96.
432
.22.
7412
.123
1.21
9
Del
tapi
ne D
P 49
111
3225
.842
.735
.228
.36.
610
.56.
237
.74.
6115
.626
.31.
643
PD05
035
1117
25.4
45.7
34.0
26.6
5.9
10.9
6.0
33.7
3.98
10.3
18.4
1.87
5M
D25
Y11
1525
.245
.635
.227
.86.
111
.16.
433
.74.
0216
.220
.81.
844
AU
3111
1111
28.2
42.2
37.1
29.6
5.9
10.1
6.4
34.3
3.67
16.5
271.
719
NC
09A
Z09
1103
24.4
42.5
34.6
26.3
5.3
9.8
5.5
33.5
3.58
15.9
32.4
1.81
3
AU
6202
1101
28.3
50.2
34.4
27.1
5.6
10.7
6.0
32.3
4.06
17.6
23.3
1.65
6N
M 0
6N11
0410
8024
.944
.931
.824
.46.
011
.76.
231
.03.
211
.323
.61.
732
NM
030
1210
6124
.346
.133
.826
.85.
811
.56.
430
.84.
39.
617
.91.
625
AU
3202
1051
27.9
41.9
36.7
28.9
5.7
11.0
6.8
30.6
3.36
19.2
27.8
2.13
PD05
041
1024
25.2
44.5
34.5
27.0
6.1
10.9
6.2
34.4
3.01
15.3
26.2
1.85
3
GA
200
6053
1009
26.4
46.7
33.5
26.1
5.3
10.1
5.4
32.7
2.81
15.1
14.9
1.17
6G
A 2
0061
0698
526
.643
.235
.928
.26.
411
.06.
634
.62.
2525
.540
.21.
639
LA07
3071
0698
226
.742
.836
.228
.66.
611
.26.
934
.73.
4222
.336
.72.
031
MD
25ne
966
24.0
43.4
34.2
27.0
5.8
10.8
5.9
33.6
4.66
8.5
17.8
2.21
9M
S 00
33-6
959
27.7
47.7
35.7
28.0
5.8
10.9
6.3
33.0
3.08
26.1
43.4
2.09
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
tV
ertic
illiu
m R
atin
gs
62
Tabl
e 27
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed re
gion
al b
reed
ers s
train
s tes
t at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, H
alfw
ay 2
010
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erPl
ants
%
wilt
% w
iltD
efol
iatio
nD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
lpe
r foo
t8/
10/1
08/
30/1
09/
22/1
0
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
tV
ertic
illiu
m R
atin
gs
NM
W12
1895
622
.647
.331
.224
.56.
511
.95.
934
.01.
9813
.630
.11.
54PX
0320
1-66
-193
324
.245
.532
.725
.55.
711
.76.
031
.32.
7615
.220
.81.
572
GA
200
4143
885
26.5
39.0
36.4
28.9
5.1
9.4
5.8
31.9
2.74
15.8
37.8
1.78
1D
elta
pine
DP
393
838
25.1
42.0
35.6
27.0
5.7
10.6
6.2
32.5
4.6
18.8
352.
34A
rk 0
232-
2480
423
.642
.433
.625
.25.
811
.46.
331
.13.
420
.340
.22.
188
NC
05A
Z06
687
16.9
45.8
27.1
19.5
4.5
10.8
4.3
28.8
4.13
24.9
45.5
2.65
6
Mea
n11
0725
.844
.834
.627
.15.
910
.86.
233
.2c.
v.%
17.7
10.3
10.9
7.4
7.5
5.6
4.1
8.5
5.7
LSD
0.0
527
73.
76.
93.
62.
90.
50.
60.
72.
6M
SD0.
9414
.615
.50.
382
63
Tabl
e 27
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
irrig
ated
regi
onal
bre
eder
s stra
ins t
est a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Hal
fway
201
0
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
89
3.5
1.17
80.7
32.5
7.1
478
.57.
931
-1,3
1-2
LA
0730
7111
3.
61.
1380
.930
.38.
52
79.7
8.2
21-2
,31-
1 A
rk 0
222-
12
3.7
1.19
81.4
31.0
9.4
379
.28.
231
-1 S
ureG
row
SG
105
3.
91.
1381
.530
.58.
32
79.2
8.5
21-2
,31-
1 F
iber
Max
FM
958
3.
81.
1280
.230
.97.
33
79.9
7.7
21-2
,31-
1
Ark
021
9-15
3.
61.
1480
.130
.59.
02
78.8
9.0
21-1
LB
B-0
7-21
-311
3.
41.
1781
.132
.88.
04
79.1
8.4
21-2
,31-
1 A
U60
01
3.7
1.14
80.8
31.7
9.3
377
.88.
521
-2,3
1-1
TA
M 0
3WZ-
37
3.5
1.16
81.4
34.0
8.3
477
.78.
131
-1,3
1-2
LA
0730
7122
4.
01.
1181
.129
.28.
33
79.1
8.4
21-2
,31-
1
LA
0630
7025
3.
91.
1681
.331
.88.
63
78.6
8.1
21-2
,31-
1 G
A 2
0070
95
3.5
1.15
81.2
31.4
8.1
280
.48.
221
-1,2
1-2
Ark
020
3-11
4.
11.
1882
.933
.48.
02
80.1
8.1
21-2
NM
06N
1166
3.
51.
1079
.830
.39.
11
81.0
8.4
11-2
,21-
2 P
X03
202-
65-1
3.
81.
1980
.633
.97.
52
76.4
9.1
31-3
Del
tapi
ne D
P 49
1 3.
41.
1580
.932
.17.
84
78.7
8.5
21-2
,31-
1 P
D05
035
3.6
1.17
81.2
31.5
8.1
280
.18.
121
-2 M
D25
Y
3.7
1.19
82.1
33.2
7.2
379
.58.
131
-1 A
U31
11
4.0
1.12
80.1
30.2
7.7
279
.88.
421
-1,2
1-2
NC
09A
Z09
3.7
1.12
81.0
31.0
8.8
378
.59.
021
-2,2
1-4
AU
6202
3.
81.
1380
.829
.58.
74
78.7
8.0
21-2
,31-
2 N
M 0
6N11
04
3.8
1.20
81.6
34.2
8.2
378
.28.
431
-1 N
M 0
3012
3.
71.
2181
.735
.17.
74
77.2
8.4
31-1
,31-
2 A
U32
02
4.1
1.14
81.0
29.9
7.5
279
.38.
221
-2,3
1-1
PD
0504
1 3.
41.
1680
.932
.27.
94
78.6
8.0
31-1
GA
200
6053
3.
71.
1380
.629
.58.
43
80.6
8.0
21-2
GA
200
6106
3.
71.
1681
.031
.17.
23
80.1
8.4
21-1
,21-
2 L
A07
3071
06
3.6
1.12
80.1
30.5
9.3
380
.58.
221
-1,2
1-2
MD
25ne
3.
51.
2081
.834
.17.
64
79.3
8.2
21-2
,31-
1 M
S 00
33-6
3.
61.
1380
.229
.98.
12
79.5
8.4
21-1
,31-
1
64
Tabl
e 27
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
irrig
ated
regi
onal
bre
eder
s stra
ins t
est a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Hal
fway
201
0
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
NM
W12
18
3.4
1.24
82.9
35.9
8.3
475
.08.
041
-1 P
X03
201-
66-1
3.
51.
1780
.633
.27.
62
77.7
9.8
21-3
,22-
1 G
A 2
0041
43
3.8
1.15
80.6
31.5
6.9
479
.58.
021
-2,3
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 39
3 3.
51.
1080
.530
.59.
33
78.2
8.4
31-1
Ark
023
2-24
3.
81.
1583
.336
.29.
04
75.5
8.4
31-1
,41-
1 N
C05
AZ0
6 3.
51.
1482
.132
.27.
53
77.5
8.6
21-1
,31-
2
Mea
n3.
61.
1581
.131
.98.
13
78.8
8.3
c.v.
%5.
41.
30.
92.
62.
523
.81.
22.
2LS
D 0
.05
0.4
0.03
1.5
1.7
0.4
11.
90.
4
65
NOTES
66
Table 28. Production information for furrow irrigated performance test at Texas AgriLife Research, Halfway, TX 2010.
Test: Verticillium Wilt Planting Date: May 6 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Triflurin @ 1 ½ pt/A applied pre plant Fertilizer: 120-0-0 lbs/A applied June 1 Irrigations: 2.4 acre inches June 24 2.8 acre inches August 3 2.0 acre inches August 24 Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting Harvest Aids: Super Boll @ 22oz/A and Def @8 oz/A applied October 4 Parazone @ 16oz/A and NIS at .05% Harvest Date: November 11 Freeze Date: November 13
67
Tabl
e 29
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed v
ertic
illiu
m w
ilt v
arie
ty te
st a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Hal
fway
201
0
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mPe
rcen
t wilt
Prec
ent w
iltD
efol
iatio
nD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l09
/30/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t8/
10/2
010
8/30
/201
09/
22/2
010
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
180B
2F
1537
25.3
45.7
33.3
26.5
6.9
12.2
6.3
36.1
836
3416
.027
.50.
924
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F
1374
26.8
42.9
36.6
30.0
6.1
11.3
6.6
33.9
765
3521
.830
.51.
212
All-
Tex
AT
8114
4 B
2RF
1359
26.3
45.9
34.6
28.2
6.5
11.0
6.1
36.6
765
3420
.532
.01.
312
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
1324
25.7
41.5
35.5
28.5
6.7
11.3
6.5
36.3
705
3524
.833
.31.
224
Phy
toG
en P
HY
367
WR
F 13
0126
.245
.536
.129
.75.
710
.36.
133
.676
434
23.5
49.0
2.03
3
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
160B
2F
1291
26.9
44.1
34.5
27.9
6.1
11.0
6.0
35.3
696
3418
.524
.80.
804
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
32 B
2RF
1266
27.3
42.0
37.4
30.0
6.0
9.9
6.1
36.2
684
3631
.341
.31.
288
Phy
toG
en P
HY
375
WR
F 12
6127
.644
.137
.529
.65.
810
.46.
433
.680
434
27.0
44.5
1.77
4 N
exG
en N
G34
10 R
F 12
4725
.847
.034
.227
.86.
812
.36.
734
.958
634
17.8
29.0
1.47
2 N
exG
en N
G25
49 B
2RF
1217
24.6
44.1
33.9
27.6
5.7
10.9
5.7
33.5
817
3531
.550
.51.
607
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
773L
LB2
1215
24.8
46.0
32.5
26.2
7.3
12.9
6.4
36.6
645
3619
.529
.81.
528
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
1199
29.0
46.1
36.5
28.3
6.0
10.6
6.3
34.3
685
3217
.840
.01.
219
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 42
88B
2F
1182
25.6
44.4
33.4
26.7
6.4
11.8
6.1
34.8
705
3337
.847
.81.
532
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
210
CT
1175
26.1
45.5
33.9
27.9
6.0
10.1
5.3
38.1
735
3343
.562
.51.
578
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
28 B
2RF
1165
28.4
40.3
37.8
30.2
6.3
9.7
6.1
38.9
645
3622
.036
.31.
519
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
34 B
2RF
1147
26.8
39.4
36.4
28.7
6.0
9.8
5.9
37.6
735
3728
.839
.01.
440
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
12 B
2RF
1141
25.9
42.3
34.7
27.8
6.2
10.8
6.1
35.3
704
3447
.570
.51.
896
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
1132
23.5
42.4
33.3
26.4
5.5
10.5
5.4
34.1
845
3525
.342
.82.
402
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
1130
24.9
44.5
32.8
25.6
6.5
12.0
6.1
34.7
695
3422
.023
.81.
422
Nex
Gen
NG
4010
B2R
F 11
1725
.344
.833
.827
.45.
711
.05.
833
.576
533
21.3
29.5
1.18
3
Mon
sant
o 10
R01
1B2R
2 11
0628
.642
.937
.129
.66.
410
.16.
337
.769
434
31.3
50.3
1.45
5 D
elta
pine
DP
104
B2R
F 11
0522
.747
.930
.925
.06.
511
.95.
635
.983
533
31.5
41.3
1.56
3 N
exG
en N
G40
12 B
2RF
1105
24.4
42.4
30.9
24.7
6.0
10.8
5.3
34.9
655
3519
.333
.81.
342
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
212
CT
1077
25.0
44.5
34.2
27.9
6.0
10.1
5.4
38.2
735
3336
.054
.01.
607
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F 10
6725
.745
.334
.328
.56.
711
.96.
535
.675
534
14.8
25.5
1.27
5
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
10
5623
.443
.832
.625
.96.
011
.97.
032
.874
435
33.0
48.3
1.61
6 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
220
B2R
F 10
5424
.043
.834
.326
.96.
011
.26.
034
.279
435
43.0
60.3
1.71
0 A
ll-Te
x A
TX L
A12
2 10
5328
.242
.336
.729
.35.
610
.26.
233
.475
633
37.5
61.8
1.89
2 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
227
B2R
F 10
4822
.344
.634
.727
.75.
910
.55.
835
.475
633
30.8
49.0
1.79
7 A
ll-Te
x A
TX 7
A21
10
2624
.141
.737
.930
.36.
110
.46.
635
.179
534
16.8
34.0
1.74
9
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
tV
ertic
illiu
m R
atin
gs
68
Tabl
e 29
. Res
ults
of t
he ir
rigat
ed v
ertic
illiu
m w
ilt v
arie
ty te
st a
t Tex
as A
griL
ife R
esea
rch,
Hal
fway
201
0
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mPe
rcen
t wilt
Prec
ent w
iltD
efol
iatio
nD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l09
/30/
10R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t8/
10/2
010
8/30
/201
09/
22/2
010
Agr
onom
ic P
rope
rties
% O
pen
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
tV
ertic
illiu
m R
atin
gs
Mon
sant
o 09
R53
2B2R
2 99
222
.142
.032
.726
.75.
310
.85.
531
.384
434
26.3
51.5
2.10
1 N
exG
en N
G15
51 R
F 94
925
.448
.933
.026
.66.
611
.96.
135
.773
533
33.3
47.8
1.94
0 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 4
020B
2RF
899
25.1
45.6
33.0
25.1
5.5
10.7
5.5
32.6
805
3441
.055
.81.
653
All-
Tex
AT
8115
8 R
F 87
524
.442
.033
.626
.36.
410
.65.
638
.180
529
24.0
29.3
1.57
3 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
030B
2F
845
27.0
43.9
35.1
28.3
5.4
10.0
5.8
33.1
804
3226
.339
.31.
801
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 82
025
.343
.135
.327
.96.
211
.66.
533
.681
434
36.5
59.3
2.00
0 M
onsa
nto
09R
348B
2R2
810
24.5
42.0
35.3
28.0
6.2
11.1
6.3
34.3
695
3348
.564
.01.
902
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
352
0B2R
F 76
424
.044
.135
.328
.15.
510
.55.
932
.883
433
45.5
64.3
1.78
2 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 75
924
.741
.137
.329
.86.
311
.06.
834
.478
435
45.5
58.0
1.98
4 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
040B
2F
720
21.7
43.2
30.7
24.9
5.8
11.7
5.5
32.8
846
3328
.343
.81.
547
Mea
n10
9825
.443
.834
.627
.76.
110
.96.
035
.075
534
c.v.
%15
.66.
55.
93.
74.
54.
22.
65.
03.
68.
914
.14.
4M
SE 1
318
.80.
296
LSD
0.0
524
02.
33.
62.
62.
50.
50.
60.
62.
59
12
69
Tabl
e 29
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
irrig
ated
ver
ticill
ium
wilt
var
iety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, L
ubbo
ck 2
010
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
180B
2F
3.4
1.14
80.3
31.4
7.8
280
.97.
731
-1 F
iber
Max
FM
917
0B2F
3.
31.
1379
.731
.07.
22
80.8
7.1
31-2
All-
Tex
AT
8114
4 B
2RF
3.4
1.17
81.3
33.0
8.7
377
.77.
521
-2,3
1-2
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
3.3
1.10
80.9
32.5
9.1
279
.38.
921
-1,3
1-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
367
WR
F 2.
91.
0979
.530
.49.
21
78.2
8.6
21-1
,21-
2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 9
160B
2F
3.0
1.12
80.8
30.5
7.0
280
.57.
531
-1,3
1-2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
32 B
2RF
4.1
1.11
79.8
29.3
8.1
178
.78.
131
-1,4
1-1
Phy
toG
en P
HY
375
WR
F 3.
11.
0979
.828
.78.
33
79.2
7.8
31-1
,31-
2 N
exG
en N
G34
10 R
F 3.
21.
1580
.531
.68.
32
78.0
8.2
21-1
,31-
1 N
exG
en N
G25
49 B
2RF
3.4
1.05
80.4
29.7
9.1
478
.98.
021
-1,2
1-2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
773L
LB2
3.3
1.14
78.8
31.6
6.1
278
.67.
331
-1,5
1-1
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
3.9
1.11
80.7
28.9
9.6
179
.58.
421
-1,3
1-1
Sto
nevi
lle S
T 42
88B
2F
3.8
1.05
78.0
28.3
8.9
275
.38.
131
-1,4
1-1
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
210
CT
3.4
1.08
79.8
31.0
8.7
180
.98.
321
-2 D
elta
pine
DP
1028
B2R
F 3.
91.
0679
.527
.69.
31
79.8
9.0
31-1
,31-
2
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
34 B
2RF
3.7
1.11
79.8
29.1
9.3
280
.28.
221
-1 D
elta
pine
DP
0912
B2R
F 3.
71.
0680
.429
.59.
12
78.9
8.2
31-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
3.7
1.14
80.8
30.5
8.7
576
.77.
631
-1,4
1-2
Fib
erM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
3.3
1.13
80.4
32.6
7.6
278
.57.
931
-1 N
exG
en N
G40
10 B
2RF
3.6
1.10
80.3
31.3
8.2
376
.98.
321
-1,2
1-2
Mon
sant
o 10
R01
1B2R
2 3.
81.
1280
.130
.08.
02
79.2
8.3
21-2
,41-
1 D
elta
pine
DP
104
B2R
F 2.
91.
0980
.532
.09.
62
79.9
8.0
21-1
,21-
2 N
exG
en N
G40
12 B
2RF
3.4
1.08
79.3
30.7
7.7
178
.68.
631
-1,3
1-2
See
d So
urce
Gen
etic
s SSG
HQ
212
CT
3.6
1.11
80.2
32.1
8.7
280
.47.
931
-2,5
1-1
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F 3.
41.
1381
.831
.18.
63
78.4
8.2
31-1
,31-
2
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
3.
11.
1178
.929
.67.
22
79.4
8.3
31-1
All-
Tex
AT
8122
0 B
2RF
3.3
1.12
79.8
30.1
8.2
280
.27.
931
-1 A
ll-Te
x A
TX L
A12
2 3.
51.
0879
.628
.19.
11
80.0
7.8
21-1
,41-
1 A
ll-Te
x A
T 81
227
B2R
F 3.
21.
1079
.329
.48.
14
76.7
7.0
31-1
,31-
2 A
ll-Te
x A
TX 7
A21
3.
51.
1580
.831
.17.
83
76.3
7.7
31-1
,41-
1
70
Tabl
e 29
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
irrig
ated
ver
ticill
ium
wilt
var
iety
test
at T
exas
Agr
iLife
Res
earc
h, L
ubbo
ck 2
010
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Mon
sant
o 09
R53
2B2R
2 3.
51.
1280
.531
.28.
64
77.1
7.2
21-1
,31-
1 N
exG
en N
G15
51 R
F 4.
01.
0780
.831
.58.
21
76.9
8.6
21-1
,31-
1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 4
020B
2RF
3.4
1.10
79.2
28.5
8.7
178
.28.
421
-1,2
1-2
All-
Tex
AT
8115
8 R
F 3.
61.
1181
.529
.99.
03
77.7
7.5
31-2
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
3.
61.
0780
.728
.28.
92
79.4
8.1
21-2
,41-
1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 3.
61.
0779
.229
.59.
41
79.6
8.6
21-2
,31-
1 M
onsa
nto
09R
348B
2R2
3.3
1.06
79.5
28.7
8.0
377
.77.
631
-1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
520B
2RF
3.3
1.09
79.6
28.3
8.8
276
.97.
931
-1 C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 3.
51.
1081
.031
.19.
82
79.7
8.7
31-1
,31-
2 B
ayer
Cro
pSci
ence
BC
SX 1
040B
2F
3.4
1.17
81.4
31.2
7.4
477
.97.
721
-1,3
1-1
Mea
n3.
41.
1080
.130
.28.
42
78.7
8.0
c.v.
%8.
82.
01.
33.
13.
640
.52.
14.
3LS
D 0
.05
0.6
0.05
2.1
1.9
0.6
23.
40.
7
71
NOTES
72
Table 30. Production information for pivot irrigated performance test at the AG-CARES farm, Lamesa, TX 2009.
Test: Nematode Variety Planting Date: May 12 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Trifluralin @ 1.3pt/A applied pre-plant Caparol @ 1.5pt/A applied May 14 Fertilizer: 10-34-0 @ 116 lbs/A applied pre-plant Irrigations: 5.1 acre-in applied May-September Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting Harvest Aids: Prep @ 2pt/A + 2oz ET with .45lb/A Zennith applied September 30 Gramoxone Inteon @ 32 oz/A + .25lb/A Array applied October 18 Harvest Date: October 26 Freeze Date: November 13
73
Tabl
e 31
. Res
ults
of t
he p
ivot
irrig
ated
nem
atod
e va
riety
test
at t
he A
G-C
AR
ES fa
rm, L
ames
a 20
10B
acte
rial
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mR
K/
Blig
htD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l9/
27/1
0R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t50
0cc
soil
Rat
ing2
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
1357
28.0
44.4
37.5
30.3
5.4
10.4
6.4
31.6
714
2942
00R
Del
tapi
ne D
P 17
4 R
F 13
5328
.640
.538
.431
.75.
79.
76.
534
.270
431
690
SPh
ytoG
en P
HY
519
WR
F 12
9728
.246
.336
.329
.24.
710
.25.
928
.576
534
1410
SPh
ytoG
en P
HY
367
WR
F 12
8726
.645
.136
.528
.84.
89.
35.
631
.573
431
488
SD
elta
pine
DP
1044
B2R
F 12
8426
.648
.835
.529
.35.
09.
45.
432
.874
530
560
S
Nex
Gen
NG
4012
B2R
F 12
8226
.647
.234
.628
.05.
39.
75.
434
.373
428
2285
RD
elta
pine
DP
1133
B2R
F12
2429
.240
.839
.231
.05.
19.
26.
232
.878
430
1680
RPh
ytoG
en P
HY
569
WR
F 11
9627
.545
.935
.628
.34.
39.
25.
329
.178
432
2100
SC
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 11
7128
.743
.638
.231
.25.
49.
96.
333
.175
432
2120
SA
ll-Te
x A
T Ep
ic R
F 11
7128
.844
.538
.530
.45.
49.
96.
432
.276
432
715
S
Nex
Gen
NG
3410
RF
1168
26.2
47.4
33.7
28.1
6.1
11.8
6.4
32.4
615
3214
10R
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 11
6429
.345
.236
.730
.05.
19.
86.
031
.266
630
1590
RFi
berM
ax F
M 9
170B
2F
1160
28.3
49.9
35.8
29.3
4.8
10.5
6.0
28.6
735
2814
40R
Ston
evill
e ST
545
8B2R
F 11
5726
.744
.536
.830
.65.
510
.16.
133
.266
532
535
SSt
onev
ille
ST 4
288B
2F
1137
25.6
47.6
34.0
27.5
5.6
10.5
5.7
33.6
794
3026
5S
All-
Tex
AT
8114
4 B
2RF
1126
25.4
46.1
35.3
28.4
5.5
11.4
6.4
30.6
705
2911
70R
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
11
1125
.846
.234
.427
.95.
310
.55.
731
.578
431
975
SA
mer
icot
AM
153
2 B
2RF
1105
26.0
47.3
33.4
26.9
5.1
11.3
5.9
28.8
785
3111
70S
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
32 B
2RF
1105
28.2
44.3
38.3
31.1
4.8
8.8
5.8
31.6
764
2815
80P
Ston
evill
e ST
528
8B2F
10
9827
.347
.836
.529
.44.
88.
95.
233
.679
529
1930
R
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
352
0B2R
F 10
9725
.146
.534
.127
.24.
99.
95.
331
.280
430
300
SC
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 4
020B
2RF
1091
25.1
45.4
34.5
27.5
5.0
9.6
5.3
32.2
794
3214
40S
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F 10
8924
.748
.434
.227
.85.
311
.16.
029
.966
631
960
PFi
berM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
1069
25.7
46.9
33.1
26.5
5.9
11.6
5.9
32.6
735
2813
20P
Del
tapi
ne D
P 16
4 B
2RF
1060
27.9
47.0
38.1
30.2
5.0
9.1
5.3
35.9
754
3124
60S
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
10
5227
.144
.236
.929
.94.
99.
55.
731
.580
428
2340
SM
onsa
nto
10R
052B
2R2
1036
28.8
41.3
39.3
31.1
5.0
9.1
6.1
32.1
584
2938
5S
Fibe
rMax
FM
174
0B2R
F 10
3426
.145
.136
.029
.54.
910
.36.
029
.181
530
4807
RN
exG
en N
G40
10 B
2RF
1033
25.6
47.0
35.5
28.1
4.7
9.4
5.3
30.9
765
2923
70R
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
302
0B2R
F99
722
.547
.132
.325
.85.
210
.75.
332
.079
429
930
R
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
tA
gron
omic
Pro
perti
es%
Ope
n
74
Tabl
e 31
. Res
ults
of t
he p
ivot
irrig
ated
nem
atod
e va
riety
test
at t
he A
G-C
AR
ES fa
rm, L
ames
a 20
10B
acte
rial
Bol
lSe
edLi
ntSe
ed p
erB
olls
Stor
mR
K/
Blig
htD
esig
natio
nY
ield
Lint
Seed
Pick
edPu
lled
Size
Inde
xIn
dex
Bol
l9/
27/1
0R
esis
tanc
eH
eigh
t50
0cc
soil
Rat
ing2
% T
urno
ut%
Lin
tA
gron
omic
Pro
perti
es%
Ope
n
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
99
022
.446
.431
.126
.05.
911
.15.
334
.780
531
1140
RN
exG
en N
G25
49 B
2RF
987
25.2
47.5
33.9
27.8
4.5
9.7
5.3
29.2
737
3113
50S
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 3
75W
RF
986
27.8
41.9
37.3
29.4
4.5
9.1
5.7
29.4
903
2620
15R
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 5
65W
RF
976
24.2
42.8
35.6
28.5
4.8
9.4
5.5
30.9
794
3121
60S
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 96
326
.646
.335
.228
.65.
310
.25.
732
.575
531
5220
S
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
37 B
2RF
950
27.4
41.3
38.4
30.7
5.1
8.6
5.7
34.3
784
3071
5S
Mon
sant
o 09
R63
7R2
947
28.1
43.5
38.5
29.8
4.8
9.5
6.1
30.3
804
2882
0S
Del
tapi
ne D
P 09
35 B
2RF
928
27.8
45.2
36.7
29.5
5.5
10.1
6.1
32.6
695
2916
80S
Fibe
rMax
FM
177
3LLB
2 90
024
.246
.933
.927
.25.
611
.46.
031
.973
529
1272
SC
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
GX
100
1B2R
F 87
822
.646
.631
.925
.44.
69.
84.
830
.776
430
530
S
Mea
n11
0026
.645
.535
.828
.85.
110
.05.
731
.775
430
c.v.
%13
.65.
43.
92.
73.
44.
83.
64.
55.
57.
017
.56.
9LS
D 0
.05
209
2.0
2.5
2.0
2.0
0.5
0.7
0.5
3.5
71
3M
SD 3
533
2 R
-Res
ista
nt S
-Sus
cept
ible
P-P
artia
l Res
ista
nce
75
Tabl
e 31
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
piv
ot ir
rigat
ed n
emat
ode
varie
ty te
st a
t the
AG
-CA
RES
farm
, Lam
esa
2010
.
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Nex
Gen
NG
4111
RF
4.3
1.12
81.7
33.6
8.6
176
.78.
431
-1,4
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 17
4 R
F 4.
31.
1180
.830
.78.
12
75.9
8.2
31-1
,41-
3Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
519
WR
F 4.
51.
1281
.632
.98.
92
77.5
8.0
31-1
,41-
1Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
367
WR
F 4.
31.
1381
.732
.38.
52
78.5
8.1
31-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
44 B
2RF
4.2
1.13
81.9
32.7
9.2
378
.57.
631
-1,3
1-2
Nex
Gen
NG
4012
B2R
F 4.
31.
1481
.932
.86.
73
74.6
7.3
41-1
,41-
2D
elta
pine
DP
1133
B2R
F4.
71.
1081
.332
.09.
11
76.5
7.9
31-1
,41-
1Ph
ytoG
en P
HY
569
WR
F 4.
21.
1382
.534
.08.
82
74.0
7.4
31-2
,51-
1C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 3
035R
F 4.
31.
0882
.831
.89.
52
77.6
8.1
31-1
,41-
1A
ll-Te
x A
T Ep
ic R
F 4.
51.
0982
.032
.49.
32
77.7
8.3
31-1
Nex
Gen
NG
3410
RF
3.7
1.14
81.5
32.8
7.7
477
.68.
031
-1,4
1-1
Mon
sant
o 09
R34
8B2R
2 4.
21.
0681
.529
.27.
44
76.9
6.9
41-1
Fibe
rMax
FM
917
0B2F
4.
21.
1381
.032
.37.
33
79.3
7.3
31-1
,31-
2St
onev
ille
ST 5
458B
2RF
4.4
1.06
79.2
30.8
8.0
277
.48.
931
-1,3
1-3
Ston
evill
e ST
428
8B2F
4.
81.
1181
.930
.98.
32
78.2
7.9
31-1
All-
Tex
AT
8114
4 B
2RF
3.9
1.21
83.2
37.5
8.4
478
.97.
431
-1,4
1-1
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
101
0B2F
4.
31.
1381
.331
.36.
91
79.8
7.9
21-2
,31-
2A
mer
icot
AM
153
2 B
2RF
4.6
1.10
80.0
28.8
7.8
178
.87.
621
-2,4
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 10
32 B
2RF
4.3
1.14
81.3
32.2
7.5
279
.17.
531
-1,3
1-2
Ston
evill
e ST
528
8B2F
4.
41.
0879
.929
.88.
52
77.9
7.0
41-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
352
0B2R
F 4.
31.
1281
.630
.38.
93
76.7
7.8
31-1
,41-
1C
ropl
an G
enet
ics C
G 4
020B
2RF
4.4
1.12
81.9
29.8
8.2
377
.27.
531
-2,4
1-1
Nex
Gen
NG
3348
B2R
F 4.
11.
1181
.431
.47.
63
79.1
8.0
21-2
,31-
2Fi
berM
ax F
M 1
845L
LB2
4.4
1.17
81.3
34.8
7.1
278
.77.
621
-1,4
1-1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 16
4 B
2RF
4.0
1.09
79.6
30.1
7.5
279
.67.
431
-1,3
1-2
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
103
0B2F
4.
41.
0880
.528
.88.
82
78.8
7.8
31-1
,31-
2M
onsa
nto
10R
052B
2R2
4.2
1.12
81.9
31.4
9.3
179
.58.
721
-1,2
1-2
Fibe
rMax
FM
174
0B2R
F 4.
61.
0981
.631
.27.
82
78.1
7.6
31-1
,41-
1N
exG
en N
G40
10 B
2RF
4.5
1.15
82.1
34.0
8.0
277
.67.
931
-1,4
1-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
302
0B2R
F 3.
91.
0881
.229
.89.
02
78.3
7.8
31-1
,31-
2
76
Tabl
e 31
A. R
esul
ts o
f the
piv
ot ir
rigat
ed n
emat
ode
varie
ty te
st a
t the
AG
-CA
RES
farm
, Lam
esa
2010
.
Des
igna
tion
Mic
rona
ireLe
ngth
Uni
form
itySt
reng
thEl
onga
tion
Leaf
Inde
xR
d+b
Col
or G
rade
1/
Bay
er C
ropS
cien
ce B
CSX
104
0B2F
4.
61.
2283
.833
.46.
95
75.7
7.2
41-1
,41-
2N
exG
en N
G25
49 B
2RF
4.2
1.04
81.0
30.2
8.8
476
.58.
431
-1,4
1-1
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 3
75W
RF
3.9
1.09
80.0
30.2
7.5
176
.97.
731
-2,4
1-1
Phyt
oGen
PH
Y 5
65W
RF
4.2
1.13
82.3
33.5
8.7
276
.87.
931
-1,4
1-1
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
322
0B2R
F 4.
41.
1082
.431
.99.
01
76.1
8.2
31-1
,41-
1
Del
tapi
ne D
P 11
37 B
2RF
4.5
1.07
80.9
28.7
8.7
175
.98.
431
-2M
onsa
nto
09R
637R
2 4.
51.
0882
.129
.89.
71
76.4
7.7
31-1
,41-
2D
elta
pine
DP
0935
B2R
F 4.
51.
0781
.330
.78.
23
78.5
7.8
31-1
,31-
2Fi
berM
ax F
M 1
773L
LB2
4.2
1.18
81.5
34.2
6.6
280
.77.
031
-1,3
1-2
Cro
plan
Gen
etic
s CG
X 1
001B
2RF
4.4
1.09
80.8
29.8
8.1
275
.18.
141
-1
Mea
n4.
31.
1181
.431
.68.
22
77.6
7.8
c.v.
%6.
22.
11.
32.
85.
250
.42.
44.
8LS
D 0
.05
0.5
0.05
2.1
1.8
0.9
23.
80.
8
77
NOTES
78
Table 32. Production information for furrow irrigated performance test at Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock, TX 2010.
Test: Bacterial Blight Planting Date: May 11 Row Spacing: 40in Planting Pattern: Solid Herbicide: Prowl @ 1 qt/A applied pre plant Fertilizer: 120-20-0 lbs/A applied pre-plant Irrigations: 1.0 acre inches June 21 1.4 acre inches August 5 Bacterial Blight: Inoculums applied August 19 Insecticide: Temik @ 2.4 lbs/A at planting
79
Table 33. Ratings of the Bacterial Blight variety screening at Texas AgriLife Research, Lubbock 2010Designation % Blight Rating Croplan Genetics CG 3020 B2RF 0 resistant Monsanto 09R348B2R2 0 resistant Deltapine DP 1133 B2RF 0 resistant PhytoGen PHY 375WRF 0 resistant All-Tex AT 81144 B2RF 3 resistant Bayer CropScience BCSX 1040B2F 4 resistant FiberMax FM 9180B2F 10 resistant FiberMax FM 1845LLB2 13 partially resistant Deltapine DP 1032B2RF 35 partially resistant FiberMax FM 1773LLB2 50 partially susceptible All-Tex AT 81220 B2RF 75 susceptible Bayer CropScience BCSX 1030B2F 83 susceptible Deltapine DP 1044 B2RF 85 susceptible All-Tex AT 81227 B2RF 87 susceptible Croplan Genetics CG 3520B2RF 88 susceptible Croplan Genetics CGX 1001B2RF 90 susceptible Croplan Genetics CG 4020B2RF 92 susceptible PhytoGen PHY 519WRF 95 susceptible All-Tex AT 81158 RF 98 susceptible All-Tex ATX 7A21 98 susceptible Monsanto 09R637R2 98 susceptible All-Tex ATX LA122 100 susceptible Bayer CropScience BCSX 1010B2F 100 susceptible Croplan Genetics CG 3035RF 100 susceptible Croplan Genetics CG 3220B2RF 100 susceptible Monsanto 09R532B2R2 100 susceptible PhytoGen PHY 367WRF 100 susceptible PhytoGen PHY 565WRF 100 susceptible PhytoGen PHY 569WRF 100 susceptible Stoneville ST 4554 B2RF 100 susceptible
Mean 67c.v.% 16.8LSD 0.05 17
80
