Upload
duongcong
View
219
Download
5
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SECTION 1
The Technology Behind Recycling Produced Water and Hydraulic
Fracturing Flowback Fluid
Presented by
Dr. David Stewart, PE Stewart Environmental Consultants, LLC
Fort Collins, CO
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
1
The Technology Behind Recycling Produced Water and Hydraulic Fracturing Flowback Fluid
“Two things are infinite: the universe and human stupidity; and I'm not sureand human stupidity; and I m not sure
about the universe.” ― Albert Einstein
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
2
Leadership & Opportunityp pp yStates & Energy Companies
•Time to take leadership on the conversion of produced water and hydraulic fracturing flowback fluid to highest and best use
•Political Opportunitypp y
•Moral and Environmental Opportunity
•Shift Public Industry Focus from Negative to Positive
As an industry, can we lead our companies to turn this waste into an asset?
Presentation OutlinePresentation Outline
Critical issues to consider in the United StatesWhat is the impact of the extended drought in this area?
This is especially true for the western US.How are local water districts responding to this draught
and energy development?What are the regulations regarding reuse of production
fluids?What issues have we found and resolved in this area.What still needs to be resolved?
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
3
Critical Issues Facing the USUse of hydraulic fracturing increases supply of
domestic energyFirst time since 1990, the US was able to meet
the Kyoto Protocols – lowest level since 1983 (EIA report)Energy independence – how important is this?
Critical Issues to Consider in the USConsider in the USWater Use
Well development – 1,500 to 15,000 bbl/well
Well Hydraulic Fracturing –70,000 to 120,000 bbl/well
Chemistry for hydraulic fracturing – what you put in you will need to treat if reuse is a consideration
Control of fluids, especially on the surface
New Federal Regulations vs. State Regulations
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
4
Water Use and Requirements –
D ht C ditiDrought Conditions
Drought conditions are either severe or extreme in Western US – this is especially true in the oil field areas of Colorado, Wyoming, New Mexico and Texasand Texas
Predictions of future conditions is continued drought
Where will the water come from?
What is the impact of the drought on energy production?
Availability of water in Permian Basin with extended drought Colorado River basin issues Municipal water supplies are stretched already
Lake JB Thomas 0.50% full (0.1% 6 months ago)
EV Spence Reservoir 5.1% full (0.2% 6 months ago)
OH Ivie Reservoir 20 7% full
Full Reservoir
OH Ivie Reservoir 20.7% full Requirement for District is to supply water for
drinking and public safety – water for E&P operations is not a concern and very limited at this point
“If you don’t have water, you can’t attract industry” – Guy Andrews – Economic Development Director – Odessa Texas
Current Conditions
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
5
Water Use as a Function of Overall Water Management
Water Use in Western US
What is the percentage of total fracking and energy development = 0.14% of total use in the US typical - (example is Colorado)
Largest use is Agricultural at 85% Second highest use is Municipal and Industrial at 7% All others is 8% This 0.14% equals the amount of water used on an annual basis by the City
of Denver.
Agricultural Use
Municipal
Other
Fracking
So what is the issue? Can’t we get more water from Agriculture?g
Agricultural use is increasingEnvironmental groups are
fighting fracking and energy development in general
Agricultural use has to increase production and use of waterp
Municipal uses are increasingOil and Gas can out bid all
othersWater from Agriculture will be a
PR nightmareE&P paid 100% higher bid than farmers
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
6
What are the impacts short and long term?
Water is very limited but required for fracking operations The ability of obtaining water from fresh water sources is severely
restrictedWhat are the options for frack make up water?
Reuse of waterWhat are the water quality requirementsWhat are the treatment issues
Is Brackish Water a potential?Western US has numerous brackish water supplies that can
be treated for frack water make upWater Rights – is it that difficult? Can water reuse affect the formation due to undesirable
precipitation
Brackish Water in the USBrackish Water in the US• Efforts to find new untapped water
supplies in the US
• NAS study on desalination
• Constraints are not the technology, but the financial, environmental and social factors
• Participation is needed by all in the development of this resource to limit any significant issues associated with this treatment
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
7
Inland Desalination a Now-Attainable Solution
Resources
Saline Aquifers
Oil, Gas and Coal Basins
Resources
O• Opportunity to convert produced water disposal cost to new water supply
Kevin Price, USBR
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
8
Environmental regulations that effect
ater se and re se?
What is the EPA doing now? Hydraulic Fracturing study authorized by
US Congresswater use and reuse? US Congress (http://www.epa.gov/hfstudy/)
Environmental Regulations Does EPA have the ability to regulate produced Does EPA have the ability to regulate produced
water and flowback water? Discharge to waters of the US – Industrial
pretreatment regulations – CWA (40 CFR 435) 2010 Effluent Guidelines for Shale Gas
Extraction http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/304m/factsheet2011.cfm#summary)y)
Reuse for energy production would likely be exempt Evaporation pits
Air Quality permits – Title V permits State Exclusions – Pennsylvania Class II
Injection wells – expensive and waste of water resource
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
9
What are the types of reuse available?
Water Reuse facilitiesWater rights in western US
Groundwater sources – brackish water potentialSurface water dischargeRequires the highest type of treatment but allows for
unlimited reuse of the waterunlimited reuse of the waterFrack water makeupSome limitations but treatment is straightforward for
treatment of this type of waterBrine issues – this is the toughest issue associated with
treatment of produced or brackish waters
Reuse (Rather than Disposal or Evaporation) Where Possible
Is Surface Water Discharge Reuse
an Option?Is this possible? Yes - We have
permitted surface water discharges in both Colorado and Utah
Surface water discharge opportunitiesDischarge permitSubsurface discharge
Water Rights associated with produced waterColorado experienceOther western states
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
10
History of Ownership of Produced Water
Western States other than Coloradoof Produced Water
Colorado Example• Tributary – Non-Tributary
Groundwater• HB 1303 – how does this
apply in Colorado• SB 165 – produced water
beneficial use
Colorado
• Prior appropriation for surface water
• Permit System• First in Use – First in Right• Groundwater basins – use
within the basin and controlbeneficial use• COGCC Rules (907)
within the basin and control by water boards
NPDES Permit – Surface Water DischargeWater Discharge
NPDES Discharge Permit Individual permit
Allows for stream mixing and dilutionExtensive time to obtain permit – 16 to
18 months State Wide Permit
Lower limits – no mixing zoneLower limits no mixing zoneLimits are set2 months to obtain permitOnly few states have this type of permit
but others are looking to follow Colorado’s example
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
11
Subsurface Discharge to a Surface Water Source
Still obtain NPDES Discharge permitNeed for groundwater monitoring programVery tight limits on monitoring but if company
owns the property, you can get your compliance point considerably downstreampoint considerably downstream
Issue with upstream vs. downstream valuesTime issues with monitoringPotential for aquifer storage recharge – water on
demand and its value
• Southwest US Facility:• Individual permit with surface
di h itExample Permit
Conditions
discharge permit• Very tight metals control• TDS control (<500 ppm)• Sodium control (<250)• Adjustment of hardness
• Colorado Facility:• Individual permit with
Westwater Utah
psubsurface discharge
• SAR Control• Benzene is the controlling
parameter• Discharge to subsurface
aquiferWellington Colorado
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
12
Wastewater Characteristics and treatment concerns
Note – fracking fluid is less than 0.5% of the overall fluid but hhas some issues with treatment
Wastewater Characteristics Spent Fluids
Minerals Brines 10% to 50+% of the original fracking fluid content Natural formation waters
Radionuclide’s Issues for treatment
G l’ ll l d li k Gel’s – cellulose, guar gums and crosslinks Organic-Metallic crosslinks with zirconium, chromium, antimony,
titanium Oil components such as asphaltines, paraffin's, etc Specific chemicals for the formation and fracking requirements
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
13
Most Difficult Issues for Water Reuse Filtration of the water
Guar gum is the most difficult item to treat and potentially the most expensive
Ranges: 200 ppm to 20,000 ppm
Metals are an issue – Scale formers or accelerant
Guar Gumformers or accelerant Hardness (Ca & Mg) needs
to be reduced Silica and Barium need to be
reduced Boron Iron
Scale Forming Salts – Removal Targets
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
14
Difficult Issues for Water ReuseControl of organicsAsphaltinesParafins
Control of SaltDischarge to water waysControl of SAR (Sodium Absorbtion Ratio)
C t l f i bControl of microbesDifficult filtration issueSulfate reducing bacteria
Water injection into Formation – TAMU studyWater Discharge Issues – CSM RPSEA Study
Flowback Chemistry Example (mg/L)
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
15
Wide Variation Flowback Chemistry (mg/L)
Note the changes in frack water chemistry with different formations and variability
Water Quality for ReuseWhat water quality is needed for reuse?Economics is Primary DriverControl of organics – need for organic free water Petroleum Hydrocarbon Removal(TOC less than 5 to 10 mg/l)
Removal of friction reducers & polymer additivesRemoval of inorganic scale forming compoundsBacteria - SRB Removal / Render InertLower TDS to local exploration companyWQ standards continually being revised.
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
16
Water Quality for Reuse
Several Companies have set internal goals of 50% reuse which is matching EPA goals
Some are going for a “Net Positive Water Production Goal” Control of salt concentrations
Control of salt verses changing chemistry for fracking solutions – economic evaluation
Custom water quality as needed Energy Economics of Increased TDS Feed < 750 mg/L TDS = IX Feed of 750-40,000 mg/L TDS = Nano / RO Feed of 40,000 – 260,000 mg/L TDS = Evaporation Feed > 260,000 mg/L TDS = Crystallization
Water Quality for Reuse
EPA Standards can govern applications depending on final use of the frack water or produced waterWatch the EPA Clean Water Act revisions to the
categorical standardsBe aware of the EPA Hydraulic Fracturing workshops
and final reportand final reportIf controlling salts, what is done with the brine waters
that are generated?Metals harvesting – Lithium examplePeriodic chart
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
17
Techniques for Treatment of Fracking Wastewater
Control of VOC’s Benzene is typically the issue Air Stripping (80% removal but might require air permitting) Granular Activated Carbon (99+% removal but expensive with respect
to the loading) Control of Heavy Oils Paraffin's, asphalts, guar gum, etc can be controlled utilizing a walnut
shell filter WSF will remove a majority of the organics, but small particles of less
than 1 micron is size is typically found in the WSF effluent Destabilization of metals and organics Electrocoagulation v. chemical precipitation Typically the economic breakpoint is 30 ppm of chemistry or more will
likely favor EC
Li id S lid ti t h i
Techniques for Treatment of Fracking Wastewater
Liquid Solid separation techniques Clarifiers Membranes
Polymeric Inorganic – Ceramic
Tri-media Pressure Filtration Removal of dissolved organics Activated carbon Surface activated zeolites Surface activated zeolites
Removal or control of salts - when required Removal of monovalent ions
IX, Nano/RO, Evaporation, Crystallization Recovery of brine chemistry for reuse
Chlor-Alkali process to (HCL or NaOH)Ten pound brine for drilling operations
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
18
Fresh
11/784,569 - Purification of oilfield Water for beneficial use (1-5)
Water &Products
6,348,154- Methods to remove heavy metals from water - rare earth minerals harvesting (4)
VOC
Polishing
Micro Plant Footprint
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
19
Economic DriversEconomics is the key to water managementCost of treatment needs to compete favorably with
cost of injectionTransportation Treatment costsWater chemistry (Texas A&M Study formation
t d )study)Evaporation pits will likely not be an option in the
futureWith the water requirements from different industry
sectors, it will be very difficult to obtain water for drilling programs without reuse
Summary – What have we learned?Water use for E&P operations is critical to the future of the
industry Produced Water can meet surface water discharge requirements Discharge permits can be to the surface or subsurface State Wide permits are available in some states and allow for
expedited permitting Discharge standards can be daunting but with careful design can
be metbe met Be aware of what you add to your fracking fluids as this is what
you will need to remove Brine reuse and recycling should be considered Harvesting of metals should be considered in the future to offset
costs
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
20
Water Rights associated with produced water turn this waste into an assetSummary – What have we Produced Water Reuse
Site specificFormation will add constituents that might be an issue
Hydraulic Fracturing Flowback Water ReuseViability highly dependant
learned?
Viability highly dependantTransportation EconomicsDisposal Economics & AvailabilityTreatment Economics (TDS – key driver)
Summary – What have we learned?y
Treatment – becoming more refined Customized to influent characteristics & output req.Mobile or Centralized depending on volumes and
transportation Pre-treatment removal is key to success
Organics H d & M l Hardness & Metals Particulates Bacteria Control
If organics and scaling compounds removed, reuse may be achieved without TDS removal in some cases
Water reuse will likely become SOP in many areas
Heavy Metal Removal –Ceramic Microfiltration Presentation
21