Upload
graham-jackson
View
213
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The second Princeton consensus on sexual dysfunction and cardiacrisk: new guidelines, new challenges
The first PrincetonConsensusConference
was convened in 1999 (1). Its remit was to
evaluate the scientific evidence regarding
sexual activity and cardiac risk with a view
to developing guidelines for advising on
the safety of sexual activity in cardiac
patients and the management of erectile
dysfunction (ED). It established a success-
ful protocol utilised worldwide. As
research progressed and the realisation of
the importance of endothelial dysfunction
and cardiovascular risk factors in the
aetiology of ED became evident the
Second Princeton Consensus Conference
was convened in June 2004 (2). This con-
ference updated the guidelines, developed
new management algorithms, reviewed
the safety of sexual activity and the treat-
ment of EDwith phosphodiesterase type 5
(PDE5) inhibitors and emphasised the
importance of lifestyle intervention in
managing ED. Specifically the importance
of increased physical activity and weight
loss was emphasised with regard to ED
therapy and general cardiovascular risk
reduction.
A follow-up report has focused on
expanding the Princeton II Guidelines
specifically addressing sexual dysfunction
and cardiac risk (3). It establishes the
concept of ED as an early symptom or
harbinger of cardiovascular disease due
to the common risk factors and patho-
physiology secondary to endothelial dys-
function (4). Clear statements follow
with important practical implications:
. ‘‘Any symptomatic man with ED
that does not have an obvious cause
(e.g. trauma) should be screened for
vascular disease and have blood glu-
cose, lipids and blood pressure mea-
surements. Ideally, all patients at risk
but asymptomatic for coronary dis-
ease should undergo an elective exer-
cise electrocardiogram to facilitate
risk stratification.’’
. ‘‘The recognition of ED as a warning
sign of silent vascular disease has led
to the concept that a man with ED
and no cardiac symptoms is a cardiac
(or vascular patient) until proven
otherwise.’’
. ‘‘Studies strongly support the role of
lifestyle factors in the development
and maintenance of ED. Obesity and
lack of exercise have been strongly
implicated in a number of cross-
sectional and longitudinal studies.
Men with ED and other cardiovascu-
lar risk factors, in particular obesity
and sedentary lifestyle, should be
counselled in lifestyle modification.’’
(Perhaps the catchphrase should be
‘‘physically fit ¼ sexually fit’’)
In a short space of time major
advances have been made in both the
treatment and understanding the
pathophysiology of ED and these are
reviewed in the Princeton II papers.
Another publication has recently
added to the overwhelming evidence
that ED predicts subsequent cardiovas-
cular disease (5).
With a lead time of 3-5 years before
the cardiac event there is obviously a
need for a major study to see if
intervention with conventional aggres-
sive cardiac risk reduction will reduce
cardiac morbidity and mortality using
ED as the baseline marker of risk. The
challenge is real – we need to rise to the
challenge because the implications for
improving vascular health and prevent-
ing clinical events are enormous given
the number of men (over 100 million)
with ED worldwide.
Graham Jackson
Editor
REFERENCES
1 DeBusk R, Drory Y, Goldstein I et al.
Management of sexual dysfunction in
patients with cardiovascular disease: the
Princeton consensus panel. Am J Cardiol
2000; 86: 175–81.
2 Kostis JB, Jackson G, Rosen R et al.
Sexual dysfunction and cardiac risk (the
second Princeton consensus conference).
Am J Cardiol 2005; 96: 313–21.
3 JacksonG, Rosen RC, Kloner RA, Kostis JB.
The second Princeton consensus on
sexual dysfunction and cardiac risk: new
guidelines for sexual medicine. J Sex Med
2006; 3: 28–36.
4 Solomon H, Man JW, Jackson G.
Erectile dysfunction and the cardiovas-
cular patient: endothelial dysfunction is
the common denominator. Heart 2003;
89: 251–3.
5 Thompson IM, Tangen CM, Goodman
PJ et al. Erectile dysfunction and sub-
sequent cardiovascular disease. JAMA
2005; 294: 2996–3002.
Pulse pressure and carotid atherosclerosis: an important linkrevisited?
In everyday clinical practice, clinicians
and nurses regularly measure blood pres-
sure and happily express the systolic and
diastolic blood pressures in clinical notes
and bedside charts. The pulse pressure
(PP), which is defined as the difference
between the systolic blood pressure
(SBP) and diastolic blood pressure
(DBP), is not routinely recorded and is
often not given more than a cursory nod
of interest, except by introspective
hypertensionologists and cynical clinical
pharmacologists. This is despite the PP
being an established risk factor for ather-
osclerosis – particularly carotid athero-
sclerosis (CA) – and a role proposed in
the risk stratification of hypertensive
patients (1).
ª 2006 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, February 2006, 60, 2, 127–133
EDITORIAL do i : 10 . 1111 / j . 1368 -5031 . 2006 . 00843 . x
Hypertension is associated with
adverse changes (whether damage or
dysfunction) in the endothelium.
Endothelial damage/dysfunction has
been demonstrated to be a reliable
prognostic indicator of future cardio-
vascular events in hypertension, with
calcium channel blockers and the ACE
inhibitors having significant direct
effects on the endothelium (2).
Although the blood vessels are subject
to high pressures, the complications of
hypertension are paradoxically throm-
botic rather than haemorrhagic (the so-
called ‘thrombotic paradox of hyper-
tension’ or ‘Birmingham paradox’). To
put things even more simply, the blood
vessels in high blood pressure clot,
rather than burst!
Changes in blood flow, vessel wall
and blood constituents are the three
components of the Virchow’s triad for
thrombogenesis. High blood pressure
(particularly SBP and consequently
PP), abnormalities in prothrombotic
factors, endothelial function and plate-
let activation and abnormalities in the
vessel wall, with increased stiffness and
cross-sectional area, are all implicated
in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis
(3–5). In a study on cardiovascular
remodelling in isolated systolic hyper-
tension (ISH) vs. that in diastolic
hypertension, patients with ISH exhib-
ited greater carotid wall volume and
vascular stiffness, despite similar carotid
mean blood pressure (MBP) in both
groups (6). This was direct evidence of
the hypothesis that increased PP was
related to stroke and total mortality, as
a result of increased arterial stiffness.
Also, there is an association between
PP and carotid remodelling in hyper-
tensives on long-term antihypertensive
treatment, in whom regression of caro-
tid artery wall hypertrophy was depen-
dent upon PP reduction (7).
Nonetheless, PP increases with age
and is strongly related to the early
development of large vessel athero-
sclerosis (8,9). Increased carotid
intima-media thickness (IMT) and car-
otid and/or iliofemoral plaque are
frequent in hypertensive subjects, but
their relationship with PP has been
rarely studied (10). However, some stu-
dies, both cross-sectional and prospec-
tive (8–15), have found an association
between PP and carotid IMT and its
progression, respectively, as sum-
marised in Table 1.
In the current issue of the
International Journal of Clinical
Practice, Su et al. (16) report a positive
relationship between aortic regurgita-
tion (AR) and CA that was attenuated
after controlling for age. PP rises with
age, as does the incidence of AR (some-
thing that is associated with a raised PP
per se). The positive relationship
between AR and IMT (41.4% in sub-
jects with severe AR vs. 26.0% in the
absence of any AR, p ¼ 0.006) was
certainly more impressive than the rela-
tionship to carotid stenosis of �50%
(6.9 vs. 3.3%, p ¼ 0.170). PP was
also found to be associated with thicker
IMT and significant CA. Significant
trends were also noted for common
carotid artery IMT and extra cranial
carotid artery (ECCA) plaque
(p < 0.001). PP, sex (male), age and
smoking had significant risk implica-
tions in hypertensives compared with
normotensives; however, in normoten-
sives, age, smoking and presence of left
ventricular hypertrophy on ECG signif-
icantly increased the risk of CA.
As far as we are aware, only one
previous study (17) has investigated
the signs of atherosclerosis in carotid
and brachial arteries among patients
with AR. This study evaluated the rela-
tionship between AR and atherosclero-
sis by comparing patients with AR and
matched controls with identical cardio-
vascular risk scores and found that the
prevalence of atherosclerosis was greater
in the AR group – this is despite a
significant higher prevalence of smok-
ing in the control group, with other
risk factors between the two groups
relatively identical. IMT was noted to
be significantly greater in the brachial
than in the common carotid arteries, in
the AR group.
The association between PP, AR and
CA is a rather interesting one, with
particular implications in elderly
patients with hypertension and diabetes
mellitus. As noted from the above stu-
dies, a high PP, irrespective of the
cause, does seem to have a direct rela-
tion to the development of athero-
sclerosis. However, whether close
monitoring of PP (in addition to striv-
ing for excellent blood pressure control)
as well as close monitoring of the sever-
ity of AR would have any significant
clinical implications on the progression
of atherosclerosis is yet to be deter-
mined. Another point of interest is to
see whether a reduction in the PP by
tight control of blood pressure, particu-
larly, SBP, strict control of diabetes and
cessation of smoking has any effect on
the progression of atherosclerosis.
Perhaps the time has come for well-
conducted clinical outcome trials that
need to be designed so that cardiovas-
cular endpoints are related to PP reduc-
tion targets. This would give
introspective hypertensionologists, as
well as cynical clinical pharmacologists,
something to think about.
V.J. Karthikeyan
Gregory Y.H. Lip
University Department of
Medicine, City Hospital,
Birmingham B18 7QH, UK
REFERENCES
1 Guidelines Committee. 2003 European
Society of Hypertension–European
Society of Cardiology guidelines for
the management of arterial hyperten-
sion. J Hypertens 2003; 21: 1011–53.
2 Nadar S, Blann AD, Lip GYH.
Antihypertensive therapy and endothe-
lial function. Curr Pharm Des 2004; 10:
3607–14.
3 Lip GYH. Hypertension and the pro-
thrombotic state. J Hum Hypertens
2000; 14: 687–90.
4 Lip GYH, Blann AD, Beevers DG.
Prothrombotic factors, endothelial func-
tion and left ventricular hypertrophy in
ª 2006 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, February 2006, 60, 2, 127–133
128 EDITORIAL
Table 1 Studies examining the relationship between pulse pressure (PP), common carotid artery intima-media thickness (CCA-IMT),
carotid atherosclerosis (CA) and plaque ulceration
Study Number (n) Findings Comments
Matthews et al. (8) 254 healthy postmenopausal
women
Average IMT (0.77 mm),
range (0.60–1.37 mm);
plaque index associated with greater
PP change (odds ratio ¼ 1.47,
p ¼ 0.01) for women with a plaque
score of �2 vs. 1 or 0
Mental stress-induced PP changes
associated with development of early
CA; widened PP, both during stress
and rest, a marker of compromised
vessel wall compliance
Zureik et al. (9) 957 volunteers
(age 59–71 years)
Correlation between PP and
CCA-IMT (OR ¼ 0.20,
p < 0.001); PP and longitudinal
DCCA-IMT (OR ¼ 0.14,
p < 0.001)
PP and CCA-IMT and DPP and
DCCA-IMT positively related
Tartiere et al. (10) 323 hypertensive subjects Diabetes mellitus, controlled
and uncontrolled (p ¼ 0.02),
high CCA-IMT (p ¼ 0.0007)
and high CCA-lumen diameter
(p ¼ 0.01) associated with high
PP. CCA-IMT/radius ratio
associated with BP control and high
PP (p ¼ 0.006)
Cause–effect relationship between PP
and CCA-IMT suggested
Salonen and Salonen (11) 1224 men Age, ambulatory PP (standardised
partial coefficient b ¼ 0.130,
p < 0.0001), cigarette-years
of smoking, serum LDL
cholesterol concentration, history
of ischaemic heart disease,
preexercise systolic blood
pressure and diabetes noted
to be most strongly associated
with CCA-IMT
SBP, PP, smoking and serum LDL
cholesterol levels major risk factors
for increased CCA-IMT
Lassila et al. (12) 200 premenopausal women
(Healthy Women Study)
PP (p � 0.05), LDL cholesterol
and a history of smoking
independently predictive of plaque
and average IMT
Valuable information on CA in
premenopausal women gained
from this study
Lakka et al. (13) 1026 Mean IMT directly related
to an SBP and PP and DSBP(p ¼ 0.005) and DPP (p < 0.001);
Mean SBP and PP directly associated
with DIMT (p < 0.001)
A prospective study that revealed a
reciprocal relationship between BP and
IMT and their increase, thus indicating
a vicious cycle between baseline
BP and IMT in central conduit vessels
Rajala et al. (14) 208 SBP, DBP and PP all positively
correlated with mean and maximal
CCA-IMT (p ¼ 0.008, 0.073
and 0.708, respectively)
High SBP, DBP and PP all noted to
be high risk for severe IMT, particularly
in elderly subjects with diabetes
mellitus and impaired glucose tolerance
Lovett et al. (15) 3007 [from the European
Carotid Surgery Trial (ECST)]
PP, SBP, mean arterial pressure
(MAP), DBP all positively
associated with presence of contra-
lateral carotid bifurcation stenosis. PP,
SBP and MAP positively associated
with ulceration on the symptomatic
side (p < 0.001)
PP strongly associated with plaque
rupture that was severe enough to be
visible on angiography
Su et al. (16) 533 (Chin-Shan Community
Cardiovascular Cohort)
High BP positively associated
with CA (OR 5.0)
Hypertension strongly influences CA
DBP, diastolic blood pressure; SBP, systolic blood pressure.
ª 2006 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, February 2006, 60, 2, 127–133
EDITORIAL 129
isolated systolic hypertension compared
with systolic-diastolic hypertension. J
Hypertens 1999; 17: 1203–7.
5 Nadar S, Lip GYH. Hypertension and
the prothrombotic state. J Am Coll
Cardiol 2003; 41: 1847.
6 Pini R, Cavallini C, Bencini F et al.
Cardiovascular remodeling is greater in
isolated systolic hypertension in older
adults: the Insufficenza Cardiaca negli
Anziani Resienti (ICARE) a Dicomano
Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2002; 40:
1283–9.
7 Boutouyrie P, Bussy C, Hayoz D et al.
Local pulse pressure and regression of
arterial wall hypertrophy during long
term antihypertensive treatment.
Circulation 2000; 101: 2601–6.
8 Matthews KA, Owens JF, Kuller LH
et al. Stress-induced pulse pressure
change predicts women’s carotid
atherosclerosis. Stroke 1998; 29:
1525–30.
9 Zureik M, Touboul PJ, Bonithon-Kopp C
et al. Cross-sectional and longitudinal
associations between pulse pressure
and common carotid intima-media
thickness in a general population.
The EVA study. Stroke 1999; 30:
550–5.
10 Tartiere JM, Kesri L, Safar H et al.
Association between pulse pressure, car-
otid intima-media thickness and carotid
and/or iliofemoral plaque in hyperten-
sive patients. J Hum Hypertens 2004;
18: 325–31.
11 Salonen R, Salonen JT. Determinants
of carotid intima-media thickness: a
population-based ultrasonography study
in Eastern Finnish men. J Intern Med
1991; 229: 225–32.
12 Lassila HC, Tyrrell KS, Matthews KA
et al. Prevalence and determinants of
carotid atherosclerosis in healthy post-
menopausal women. Stroke 1997; 28:
513–7.
13 Lakka TA, Salonen R, Kaplan GA et al.
Blood pressure and the progression of
carotid atherosclerosis in middle-aged
men. Hypertension 1999; 34: 51–6.
14 Rajala U, Paivansalo M, Laakso M et al.
Associations of blood pressure with car-
otid intima-media thickness in elderly
Finns with diabetes mellitus or impaired
glucose tolerance. J Hum Hypertens
2003; 17: 705–11.
15 Lovett JK, Howard SC, Rothwell PM.
Pulse pressure is independently asso-
ciated with carotid plaque ulceration. J
Hypertens 2003; 21: 1669–76.
16 Su TC, Lee YT, Chien KL et al. Pulse
pressure, aortic regurgitation and caro-
tid atherosclerosis in hypertensives. Int J
Clin Pract 2005.
17 Kervancioglu S, Davutoglu V, Ozkur A
et al. Carotid and brachial intima-media
thickness, arterial diameter and resistiv-
ity indices in aortic regurgitation. Acta
Radiol 2004; 45: 815–8.
Changes in organisation of oxygen therapy in England and Wales
Long-term home oxygen therapy
(LTOT) is the one treatment shown to
improve survival in chronic obstructive
pulmonary disease (COPD) patients
with chronic hypoxia. The two key
studies that underpin this evidence are
over 20 years old; they looked at patients
with chronic hypoxia. In the Medical
Research Council study (1), patients
with hypercapnia and a PaO2 between
5.3 and 8 kPa were given oxygen for
15 h compared with nothing. In the
Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial
(NOTT) (2), the criterion was a PaO2
<7.3 kPa. These studies showed that sur-
vival was improved by oxygen used for at
least 15 h a day, and the NOTT study
showed that overnight use of oxygen was
not sufficient while aiming for 24-h use
proved most beneficial. Subsequent
studies have been able to show an
improvement in health-related quality
of life as well as survival on LTOT (3).
In England and Wales, the organisa-
tion of oxygen use has been fragmented
because blood gas investigations need
to be done in hospital while the pre-
scription of oxygen has been through
general practitioners. Portable oxygen
therapy during exercise has been very
limited because heavy pressurised gas
cylinders have been used rather than
lighter liquid oxygen cylinders. The
whole situation is about to change in
England and Wales, where over 60,000
patients are prescribed home oxygen.
Four suppliers have been selected to
provide an enhanced service ordered
primarily by hospital specialists.
Generally, the criteria for LTOT
have extended beyond COPD in the
original studies to other causes of
chronic hypoxia. However, a number
of studies have shown that the prescrip-
tion of LTOT often does not follow the
current recommendations (4,5).
General practitioners will still be able
to prescribe oxygen, but this will
usually be for short-term relief often
as part of palliative care. Prescriptions
for short-term oxygen therapy are
common but have little scientific evi-
dence to back up their use (6). It tends
to be used before or after exercise or
intermittently in palliative care. The
recommendations are that it is reserved
for those who are otherwise on optimal
therapy and who show an improvement
in breathlessness or exercise tolerance
with intermittent oxygen.
The essential criteria for LTOT
remain the same. Patients should have
chronic hypoxaemia demonstrated while
in a stable state on two occasions at least
3 weeks apart. The PaO2 should be at or
below 7.3 kPa (55 mmHg) while
breathing air or 7.3–8.0 kPa for patients
with polycythaemia or pulmonary
hypertension. Stability at the time of
assessment means that the patient
should be on optimal medical therapy
and free of exacerbation for at least 5
weeks. Arterial gas measurement should
be repeated on the intended oxygen flow
rate to make sure that the PaO2 rises
above 8 kPa without excessive CO2
retention. Saturation alone is not con-
sidered sufficient in most European
countries but can be used as a
The author confirms that he has no conflicts
of interest with regard to the subject of this
article.
ª 2006 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, February 2006, 60, 2, 127–133
130 EDITORIAL
preliminary to blood gas estimation
because PaO2 <8 kPa is not likely to
be associated with a saturation of 93%
or higher. Blood gas estimation should
be repeated at yearly intervals to check
that the flow rate is appropriate. A sig-
nificant minority have improved blood
gas levels at 1 year, which mean that
oxygen can be discontinued at least tem-
porarily with gases repeated at intervals.
Patients who continue to smoke risk
fires and burns from their supplemental
oxygen therapy; hence, oxygen is not
normally prescribed to current smokers.
The opportunities should be taken to
promote smoking cessation.
Ambulatory oxygen should be used to
increase patient mobility and quality of
life. Liquid oxygen will be more easily
available and this allows patients to use a
light cylinder that lasts for several hours
and is portable enough to be carried.
Small compressed gas cylinders are too
heavy to be practical and last less than
2 h. However, liquid oxygen is more
expensive and many patients on LTOT
would not move far outside their homes
even with a portable supply. Therefore,
this should only be prescribed after a
careful evaluation of the mobility of
those on LTOT. For patients not using
LTOT, criteria for ambulatory use
should be a drop in oxygen saturation
on exercise of 4% to <90%, distance
walked or breathlessness improved by
oxygen and the motivation and oppor-
tunity to use it.
LTOT will be prescribed by desig-
nated hospital specialists, usually
respiratory physicians (Figure 1). A
‘Home Oxygen Service Order Form’
will be faxed to one of the four con-
tractors who deal with specified areas.
The equipment can be a choice made
between the contractor and the prescri-
ber. At the same time, the patient
should be informed carefully of the
reasons for the prescription and the
appropriate way to use the equipment.
This information and follow-up are
often best provided through a respira-
tory specialist nurse. The respiratory
specialist nurse should review the
patient at home within 4 weeks; arterial
blood gases should be checked on air
and oxygen at 3 months and then at
least annually. The prediction is that
around 50% of LTOT patients will
need assessment for ambulatory oxy-
gen. It is estimated that this process
will require around 12 h of care and
assessment each year for each LTOT
patient, necessitating the equivalent of
one member of staff for every 100
LTOT patients.
CONCLUS IONS
Changes to the oxygen provision
requirements in England and Wales in
2005 mean a shift in responsibility
from primary to secondary care. It is
an opportunity to ensure that oxygen is
used appropriately and extensively
enough. The greater availability of
liquid oxygen and lightweight portable
cylinders has the potential to improve
the mobility and quality of life of many
patients with chronic respiratory dis-
ease. The challenge for secondary care
is to establish an efficient service to take
on this new organisation and ensure the
effective and efficient use of oxygen at
home in chronic lung disease.
P. John Rees
Senior Lecturer
King’s College School of
Medicine at Guy’s, King’s and
St Thomas’ Hospitals, Guy’s
Hospital, London, UK
REFERENCES
1 Report of the Medical Research Council
Working Party. Long-term domiciliary
oxygen therapy in chronic hypoxic
cor pulmonale complicating chronic
bronchitis and emphysema. Lancet
1981; 1: 681–6.
2 Nocturnal Oxygen Therapy Trial Group.
Continuous or nocturnal oxygen therapy
in hypoxaemic chronic obstructive lung
disease. Ann Intern Med 1980; 93:
391–8.
3 Eaton T, Lewis C, Young P, Kennedy Y,
Garrett JE, Kulbe J. Long-term
oxygen therapy improves health-related
quality of life. Respir Med 2004; 98:
285–93.
4 Shankar P, Muthiah MM. Audit on pre-
scription of long term oxygen treatment.
Clin Perform Qual Health Care 2000; 8:
134–5.
5 Ringbaek TJ, Lange P, Viskum K.
Geographic variation in long-term oxy-
gen therapy in Denmark: factors related
to adherence to guidelines for long-term
oxygen therapy. Chest 2001; 119:
1711–6.
6 Nandi K, Smith AA, Crawford A et al.
Oxygen supplementation before or after
submaximal exercise in patients with
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Thorax 2003; 58: 670–3.
Chronic hypoxaemia with PaO2 <7.3 kPa on two occasions at least 3 weeks apart at least 5 weeks after exacerbation
Assess oxygen flow rate to get PaO2 >8 kPa
Fill in Home Oxygen Service Form
Consider ambulatory oxygenRespiratory specialist nurse visit at 1 month
Low activity Active
Arterial gases on air and oxygen at 3 monthsOxygen at LTOT
flow rate Assess flow rate to keepSaO2 >90% on exercise
Respiratory specialist nurse follow-up
2-month trial
Annual blood gases
Figure 1 Flow chart of the process for the prescription and monitoring of home oxygen
ª 2006 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, February 2006, 60, 2, 127–133
EDITORIAL 131
Rasagiline – is there a place for this drug in managing Parkinson’sdisease?
In this issue of IJCP, Prof. Fabrizio
Stocchi sums up the results of three
studies with a new monoamine B inhi-
bitor, rasagiline, highlighting the signif-
icant results that might guide clinicians
to determine the role of this novel drug
in the management of patients with
Parkinson’s disease (1). It is a second
generation monoamine oxidase B
(MAO-B) inhibitor, introduced after
more than 20 years of the first drug in
this class, selegiline which has faced ups
and downs in its use. Rasagiline is
unique in that its role has been investi-
gated in different stages of Parkinson’s
disease (PD) prior to being introduced
for use. As Prof. Stocchi describes, the
wash-in delayed-start design of
TEMPO study has been the first of its
kind, and the continuing superiority of
the early users of rasagiline over the late
users has been promoted as a disease-
modifying or neuroprotective property
of the drug, perhaps in parallel with the
antiapoptotic activity in in vitro studies.This might be the result of the benefit
of an attempt of early normalization of
dopaminergic transmission as com-
pared with late introduction of drug
therapy, supporting the notion that
late starters never catch up. Previous
studies using functional imaging (2,3)
have not been considered to be repre-
sentative of neuroprotection (4); clin-
ical superiority as shown in TEMPO
might be indicative of neuroprotection,
but there is need for more research on
this principle.
The studies with rasagiline have
produced some results which might
be considered to be unique. In addition
to the possible disease-modifying
property, rasagiline has been shown to
improve quality of life, early morning
akinesia and more significantly the
postural instability and gait disorders
including freezing of gait. These symp-
toms present a challenge in advancing
PD, and any therapeutics in this
direction are welcome to help patients.
Currently available drugs have not
produced evidence for these motor
and non-motor symptoms of PD.
Entacapone has been studied in one of
the studies as a comparative group, but
it has not been able to establish its place
for improving the quality of life (5).
Where would rasagiline fit into the
pharmacotherapy of PD with the
currently available drugs. Levodopa
remains clinically most effective and
rapid acting drug, but its use is still
surrounded by a number of controver-
sies (6). There are proponents both for
its early and delayed use in PD patients.
There is nevertheless a consensus that
the dose of levodopa should be the
minimum possible to ameliorate an
individual patient’s symptoms to
reduce the risk of levodopa-related dys-
kinesia. Early use of dopamine agonists
helps to reduce the risk of dyskinesia
(7). Maintaining a patient at a lower
dose of levodpa with some reference to
the body weight might further help to
reduce dyskinesia (8). Any drug with
levodopa-sparing efficacy while provid-
ing sufficient symptom control is a step
towards achieving a reduction in dyski-
nesia. Rasagiline may be added to the
number of currently available drugs to
reduce the dose of levodopa and thus to
reduce dyskinesia. The design of studies
with rasagiline did not allow a reduc-
tion in the dose of levodopa resulting in
a slight increase in dyskinesia. In clinical
practice, however, the physicians would
aim to reduce the dose of levodopa and
thus able to prevent dyskinesia.
Concern has been raised regarding
the use of MAO-B inhibitors and an
increase in mortality. A meta-analysis
of the use of these drugs in early dis-
ease, however, allayed these concerns
(9), but the recommendation seems to
be that these drugs are safe for use as a
monotherapy in young and generally
well PD patients (10). In practice, the
majority of the PD patients are older
and get frail as the disease advances.
Sixteen of the 17 studies in the meta-
analysis were with selegiline. There are
basic differences between selegiline and
rasagiline; the metabolite of selegiline is
an amfetamine with the potential for
harm, whereas the metabolite of rasagi-
line is an inactive non-amphetamine
substance. This difference is likely to
be clinically significant, but we need
evidence with longer term clinical
studies.
Rasagiline may have a role in
managing Parkinson’s disease patients
across the span of the disease as
monotherapy or adjunct therapy,
and every patient may benefit from
its use at some stage during the
course of the disease. It is unlikely
to replace selegiline or dopamine ago-
nists but may be a better and safer
drug in older and frail patients who
may be at a risk of developing hallu-
cination and confusion which are less
likely with rasagiline. We also watch
with interest further developments in
pharmaco-therapeutics of PD with
the introduction of topical dopamine
agonist, duodenal levodopa and the
new non-dopaminergic therapeutic
concept with Adenosin A2A receptor
antagonist. While the search for novel
agents to improve management of
Parkinson’s disease, aiming to prevent
disease progression, abolish motor
disability and eventually the cognitive
impairment continues, the clinicians
need to use the currently available
agents to the maximum benefit for
an individual patient.
Jagdish C. Sharma
Stroke and Parkinson’s Disease
Services, Sherwood Forest
Hospitals NHS Trust, Newark &
Mansfield Hospitals, Notts, UK
Email: jagdish.sharma@sfh-
tr.nhs.uk
ª 2006 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, February 2006, 60, 2, 127–133
132 EDITORIAL
REFERENCES
1 Stocchi F. Rasagiline: defining the role
of a novel therapy in the treatment of
Parkinson’s disease. Int J Clin Pract ; 60:
215–221.
2 Whone AL, Watts RL, Stoessl AJ et al.
Slower progression of Parkinson’s
disease with ropinirole versus levodopa:
the REAL-PET study. Ann Neurol
2003; 54: 93–101.
3 CALM-PD and CALM-PD Parkinson
Study group. Dopamine transporter brain
imaging to assess the effects of pramipexole
vs levodopa on Parkinson’s disease progres-
sion. JAMA 2002; 287: 1653–61.
4 Clarke CE. A ‘Cure’ for Parkinson’s
disease: can neuroprotection be proven
with current trial designs? Mov Disord
2004; 19: 491–8.
5 Reichmann H, Boas J, Macmahon D,
Myllyla V, Hakala A on behalf of the
ComQol Study Group. Efficacy of
combining levodopa with entacapone
on quality of life and activities of daily
living in patients experiencing wearing
off type fluctuations. Acta Neurol Scand
2005; 111: 21–8.
6 Olanow CW, Agid Y, Mizuno Y et al.
Levodopa in the treatment of
Parkinson’s disease: current controver-
sies. Mov Disord 2004; 19: 997–1005.
7 Rascol O, Brookes DJ, Korczyn AD
et al. A five year study of the incidence
of dyskinesia in patients with early
Parkinson’s disease who were treated
with ropinirole or levodopa. N Engl J
Med 2000; 342: 1484–91.
8 Sharma J, Macnamara L, Vassallo M.
Levodopa associated dyskinesia in
Parkinson’s disease is related to body
weight. Age Ageing 2005; 1 (Suppl. 1):
i31 (Abstract).
9 Ives NJ, Stowe RL, Marro J, Counsell C,
Macleod A, Clarke CE. Monoamine
oxidase typeB inhibitors in early
Parkinson’s disease: meta-analysis of 17
randomised trials involving 3525
patients. BMJ 2004; 329: 593–6.
10 Ben-ShlomoY,BhatiaK.Usingmonoamine
oxidase type B inhibitors in Parkinson,s
disease. BMJ 2004; 329: 581–2.
ª 2006 The AuthorsJournal compilation ª 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Int J Clin Pract, February 2006, 60, 2, 127–133
EDITORIAL 133