14
1 The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS ® Program Aarti N air, Ph.D. Postdoctoral Fellow & Clinical Instructor UCLA PEERS Clinic Semel Institute for Neuroscience & Human Behavior Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences Social Deficits Among Youth with ASD § Poor social communication § Problems with topic initiation § Use repetitive themes § Perseverate on restricted interests § Disregard the other persons interests § One-sided conversations § Elicit fewer extended responses § Give fewer reciprocal responses § Fail to identify common interests § Difficulty providing relevant information § Make unexpected leaps in topics § Pedantic style of speaking § Poor speech prosody § Highly verbose § Difficulty interpreting verbal and nonverbal social cues § Voice tone § Sarcasm § Gestures § Social touch (Volkmar & Klin, 1998; Bauminger & Kasari, 2000; Orsmond, Krauss, & Seltzer, 2004; Koning & Magill-Evans, 2001; LeCouteur et al., 1989; Marks, Schrader, Longaker, & Levine, 2000; Ghaziuddin & Gerstein, 1996; Twatchman-Cullen, 1998; Hemphill & Siperstein, 1990; Church, Alisanki, Amanullah, 2000; Constantino, 2005) Photo of PEERS ® courtesy of Associated Press Social Deficits Among Youth with ASD § Poor social awareness § Poor eye-contact § Difficulty understanding social cues and social landscape § Poor social motivation § Less involvement in social activities § Extra-curricular activities § Clubs § Sports § Lack of peer entry attempts § Fewer social initiations § Poor social cognition § Difficulty understanding the perspectives of others § Poor theory of mind § Lack of cognitive empathy (Volkmar & Klin, 1998; Bauminger & Kasari, 2000; Orsmond, Krauss, & Seltzer, 2004; Koning & Magill-Evans, 2001; LeCouteur et al., 1989; Marks, Schrader, Longaker, & Levine, 2000; Ghaziuddin & Gerstein, 1996; Twatchman-Cullen, 1998; Hemphill & Siperstein, 1990; Church, Alisanki, Amanullah, 2000; Constantino, 2005)

The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

1

The Science of Making Friends:The UCLA PEERS® Program

Aarti Nair, Ph.D.Postdoctoral Fellow & Clinical Instructor

UCLA PEERS ClinicSemel Institute for Neuroscience & Human BehaviorDepartment of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences

Social Deficits Among Youth with ASD

§ Poor social communication§ Problems with topic initiation § Use repetitive themes

§ Perseverate on restricted interests§ Disregard the other person�s interests

§ One-sided conversations § Elicit fewer extended responses§ Give fewer reciprocal responses§ Fail to identify common interests

§ Difficulty providing relevant information § Make unexpected leaps in topics§ Pedantic style of speaking§ Poor speech prosody§ Highly verbose§ Difficulty interpreting verbal and nonverbal

social cues§ Voice tone§ Sarcasm§ Gestures§ Social touch

(Volkmar & Klin, 1998; Bauminger & Kasari, 2000; Orsmond, Krauss, & Seltzer, 2004; Koning &

Magill-Evans, 2001; LeCouteur et al., 1989; Marks, Schrader, Longaker, & Levine, 2000;

Ghaziuddin & Gerstein, 1996; Twatchman-Cullen, 1998; Hemphill & Siperstein, 1990; Church,

Alisanki, Amanullah, 2000; Constantino, 2005)

Photo of PEERS® courtesy of Associated Press

Social Deficits Among Youth with ASD

§ Poor social awareness § Poor eye-contact§ Difficulty understanding social cues

and social landscape§ Poor social motivation

§ Less involvement in social activities§ Extra-curricular activities§ Clubs§ Sports

§ Lack of peer entry attempts § Fewer social initiations

§ Poor social cognition§ Difficulty understanding the

perspectives of others§ Poor theory of mind§ Lack of cognitive empathy

(Volkmar & Klin, 1998; Bauminger & Kasari, 2000; Orsmond, Krauss, & Seltzer, 2004; Koning & Magill-Evans, 2001; LeCouteur et al.,

1989; Marks, Schrader, Longaker, & Levine, 2000; Ghaziuddin & Gerstein, 1996; Twatchman-Cullen, 1998; Hemphill & Siperstein,

1990; Church, Alisanki, Amanullah, 2000; Constantino, 2005)

Page 2: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

2

Consequences of Social Deficits forYouth with ASD

§ Social neglect and isolation§ Withdrawn§ Seen as shy by others § Go unnoticed § Not engaging others socially

§ Peer rejection§ Teased and bullied§ Unsuccessful attempts to socially

engage others§ Bad reputation

§ Peer conflict§ Arguments may result in

termination of friendship§ Lack of close reciprocal

friendships§ Poor friendship quality

(Volkmar & Klin, 1998; Bauminger & Kasari, 2000; Orsmond, Krauss, & Seltzer, 2004; Koning & Magill-Evans, 2001; LeCouteur et al., 1989; Marks, Schrader, Longaker, & Levine, 2000; Ghaziuddin & Gerstein,

1996; Twatchman-Cullen, 1998; Hemphill & Siperstein, 1990; Church, Alisanki, Amanullah, 2000)

Photo of PEERS® courtesy of Associated Press

Poor Quality of FriendshipsAmong Individuals with ASD

• Poor overall quality of friendships – Less companionship– Less help from

friends– Less security within

friendships

• Greater loneliness(Bauminger & Kasari, 2000)

Why Target Friendships?

Having one or two close friends:

• Predicts later adjustment in life

• Can buffer the impact of stressful life events

• Correlates positively with:– Self-esteem– Independence

• Correlates negatively with:– Depression– Anxiety

(Buhrmeister, 1990; Matson, Smiroldo, & Bamburg, 1998; Miller & Ingham, 1976)

Page 3: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

3

Limitations of Social Skills Training

• Do not include adolescents in treatment

• Do not teach ecologically valid social skills

• Fail to tailor teaching methods to shared strengths and weaknesses

• Do not include homework assignments

• Skills do not generalize to other settings

• Do not include caregivers in the treatment

• Do not assess treatment outcome

Background about PEERS®

• International program– Developed at UCLA in 2004– Adolescent program has been

translated into over a dozen languages– Used in over 25 countries

• Evidence-Based Social Skills Programs:– PEERS® for Preschoolers– PEERS® for Adolescents– PEERS® for Young Adults

PEERS® for Mental Health ProfessionalsProgram for the Education & Enrichment of Relational Skills

(Laugeson & Frankel, 2010)

• Parent-assisted– Concurrent parent and teen sessions– Parents are trained as social coaches

• Appropriate for socially motivated teens• Addresses core social deficits in ASD • Focuses on relationship skills• Teaches ecologically valid social skills• 14-week curriculum

– 90 minute weekly sessions • Evidence-based:

– Teens in middle and high school with ASD– Young adults (18-24 years of age) with ASD– Teens with ADHD– Teens with FASD– Teens with ID

Page 4: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

4

PEERS® for EducatorsProgram for the Education & Enrichment of Relational Skills

(Laugeson, 2014)

• Teacher-facilitated in the classroom

• 16-week curriculum • 30-60 minute daily lesson plans • Focuses on friendship skills • Strategies for handling peer

rejection/conflict• Includes weekly comprehensive

parent handouts– No parent group

• Evidence-based treatment for ASD– Middle school– High school

PEERS® for Young AdultsWeekly Caregiver-Assisted Manual

(Laugeson, 2017)

• Caregiver-assisted– Concurrent social coaching and young adult

sessions• Appropriate for socially motivated adults• Addresses core social deficits in ASD • Focuses on relationship skills

• Friendships, dating, conflict, rejection• Teaches ecologically valid social skills• 16-week curriculum

– 90-minute weekly sessions – Library of video role play demonstrations

• Evidence-based:– Young adults (18-24 years of age) with ASD

The Science of Making Friends:Helping Socially Challenged Teens and Young Adults

(Laugeson, 2013)

• Parent book• Friendship skills• Handling peer

rejection and conflict• Parent section

– Narrative lessons– Social coaching tips

• Chapter summaries for teens and young adults

• Chapter exercises / homework• Companion DVD

– Role-play videos• Mobile App: FriendMaker

– Virtual social coach

Page 5: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

5

Evidence-Based Methods for Teaching Social Skills

§ Small class format§ 10-14 students

§ Didactic lessons§ Concrete rules and steps of social etiquette§ Ecologically valid social skills

§ Role-play demonstrations§ Model social behavior§ Appropriate and inappropriate

demonstrations§ Perspective taking questions

§ Behavioral rehearsal exercises§ Practice with coaching

§ Homework assignments§ Practice in natural social settings§ Helps generalize skills

§ Parent and/or teacher coaching

(Matson, 1984; Davies & Rogers, 1985; Fleming & Fleming, 1982; Mesibov, 1984; Gresham, Sugai, & Horner, 2001; Gralinski &

Kopp, 1993; Rubin & Sloman, 1984, Frankel & Myatt, 2003; Rao, Beidel, & Murray, 2008; Laugeson et al., 2008)

Photo of PEERS courtesy of Associated Press

Overview of Teen PEERS®

Curriculum§ Conversational skills

§ Trading information§ Finding common interests§ Having a reciprocal two-way

conversation§ Non-verbal communication

§ Electronic communication§ Voicemail, email, IM, text

messaging, social networking sites

§ Online safety§ Choosing appropriate friends

§ Identifying a peer group / crowd§ Identifying extracurricular

activities

(Laugeson & Frankel, 2010; Laugeson, 2013; Laugeson, 2014)

Photo of PEERS® courtesy of Associated Press

Overview of Teen PEERS®

Curriculum§ Appropriate use of humor

§ Paying attention to humor feedback

§ Peer entry strategies§ Starting individual conversations§ Entering group conversations

§ Peer exit strategies§ Exiting conversations

§ Good sportsmanship§ Playing nicely during games and

sports§ Get-togethers

§ Being a good host or guest during get-togethers with friends

(Laugeson & Frankel, 2010; Laugeson, 2013; Laugeson, 2014)

Photo of PEERS® courtesy of Associated Press

Page 6: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

6

Overview of Teen PEERS®

Curriculum

§ Peer conflict§ Handling arguments with friends

§ Peer rejection§ Handling teasing§ Utilizing embarrassing feedback§ Handling physical bullying § Managing rumors and gossip§ Minimizing cyber bullying§ Changing a bad reputation

§ Graduation§ Where to go from here§ Graduation party & ceremony

(Laugeson & Frankel, 2010; Laugeson, 2013; Laugeson, 2014)

Photo of PEERS® courtesy of Associated Press

Weekly Lesson Format

§ Homework review (30 min)§ Troubleshoot homework

problems§ Individualize treatment

§ Didactic instruction (30 min)§ Concrete rules / steps for social

etiquette § Role-play / modeling

§ Socialization activity (30 min)§ Behavioral rehearsal for teens§ Performance feedback through

coaching

PEERS® Evidence-Base: Parent-Assistance with Teens and Adults

Page 7: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

7

PEERS® Evidence-Base: Replication Studies with Teens & Adults

PEERS® Evidence-Base

PEERS® Research Snapshot: Parent-Assisted for Teens with ASD

(Laugeson, Frankel, Gantman, Dillon, & Mogil 2012)

Improvement in Social Responsiveness (Total)

02468101214

Condition

Mean

Cha

nge i

n Sco

res

Treatment

Waitlist

Improvement in Social Skills

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

Condition

Mean

Chan

ge in

Score

s

TreatmentWaitlist

Hosted Get-togethers

0

1

2

3

4

5

Condition

Mean

Change

in Scor

es

TreatmentWaitlist

(p < .01)

(p < .01)

(p < .01)

Page 8: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

8

PEERS® Research Snapshot: 14-week Follow-up with

Parent-Assisted for Teens with ASD(Laugeson, Frankel, Gantman, Dillon, & Mogil 2012)

Social Responsiveness Scale T1-T3 (p < 0.01)

606570758085

T1 T2 T3

Testing Time

Mea

n Sc

ores

Treatment Group

Social Skills Scale T1-T3 (p < 0.01)

70

75

80

85

90

95

T1 T2 T3

Testing Time

Mea

n Sc

ores

Treatment Group

Hosted Get-Togethers - Adolescent ReportT1-T3 (p < 0.05)

012345

T1 T2 T3

Testing Time

Mea

n Sc

ores

Treatment Group

80859095

100105110

T1 T2 T3

Me

an

Sco

res

Testing Time

Social SKills Scale T1-T3 (p < 0.03) *

Treatment Group

Problem Behaviors Scale T1-T3 (p < 0.01) *

102104106108110112114116

T1 T2 T3

Testing Time

Mean

Sco

res

Treatment Group

Parent Report Teacher Report

PEERS® Research Snapshot: New Findings at 14-week Follow-up with

Parent-Assisted for Teens with ASD(Laugeson, Frankel, Gantman, Dillon, & Mogil 2012)

PEERS® Research Snapshot: School-Based Curriculum for Teens with ASD

(Laugeson, Ellingsen, Sanderson, Tucci, & Bates 2014)

(p < .01)

Page 9: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

9

PEERS® Research Snapshot: School-Based Curriculum for Teens with ASD

(Laugeson, Ellingsen, Sanderson, Tucci, & Bates 2014)

-2-101234

Mea

n C

hang

e in

Sco

res

Condition

Improvement in Social Awareness

PEERSSuper Skills

-1012345

Mea

n C

hang

e in

Sco

res

Condition

Improvement in Social Motivation

PEERSSuper Skills

-3-2-101234

Mea

n C

hang

e in

Sco

res

Condition

Decrease in Autistic Mannerisms

PEERSSuper Skills

(p < .03) (p < .03)

(p < .03)(p < .02)

PEERS® Research Snapshot: School-Based Curriculum for Teens with ASD

(Laugeson, Ellingsen, Sanderson, Tucci, & Bates 2014)

-505

10

Mea

n C

han

ge

in S

core

s

Condition

Social Anxiety

PEERSSuper Skills

02468

Mea

n C

han

ge

in S

core

s

Condition

Adolescent Social Skills Knowledge

PEERSSuper Skills

-3-2-10123

Me

an

Ch

an

ge

in S

co

res

Condition

Number of Hosted Get-togethers in Previous Month

PEERSSuper Skills

-3-2-10123

Me

an

Ch

an

ge

in S

co

res

Condition

Number of Invited Get-togethers in Previous Month

PEERSSuper Skills

(p < .01)

(p < .02)

(p < .06, trend)(p < .01)

PEERS® School-Based Teacher-Facilitated and Parent-Assisted Study for Teens with ASD

(Laugeson, Tucci, Bolourian, Gantman, & Ellingsen, in preparation)

N = 146

Parent Assistancen = 49

Pre-test

Post-test

No Parent Assistancen = 97

Pre-test

Post-test

Page 10: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

10

6970717273747576

Pre-Test Post-test

SRS

-P T

otal

T S

core

s

Social Responsiveness Scale – Total

787980818283848586

Pre-Test Post-testSSIS

-P S

ocia

l Ski

lls S

tand

ard

Scor

es

SSIS Overall Social Skills

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

Pre-Test Post-test

SAS-

P So

cial

Anx

iety

Raw

Sc

ores

SAS Social Anxiety

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

Pre-Test Post-test

Hos

ted

Get

-Tog

ethe

rs in

Pas

t M

onth

Hosted Get-Togethers

p = .002

PEERS® Research Snapshot: School-Based Curriculum for Teens with ASD

(Laugeson, Tucci, Bolourian, Gantman, & Ellingsen, in preparation)

0

5

10

15

20

25

Pre-Test Post-test

TASS

K R

aw S

core

s

Adolescent Social Skills Knowledge

43.5

44

44.5

45

45.5

46

46.5

Pre-Test Post-test

PHS-

2 Se

lf-Es

teem

T S

core

s

Overall Self-Esteem

PEERS® Research Snapshot: School-Based Curriculum for Teens with ASD

(Laugeson, Tucci, Bolourian, Gantman, & Ellingsen, in preparation)

58

60

62

64

66

68

70

72

Pre-Test Post-test

SRS-

P So

cial

Aw

aren

ess

T Sc

ores

SRS-P Social Awareness

Parent

No Parent

5860626466687072

Pre-Test Post-test

SRS-

P To

tal T

Sco

res

Social Responsiveness Scale - Total

Parent

No Parent

626466687072747678

Pre-Test Post-test

SRS

-P S

ocia

l Cog

ntiio

n T

Scor

es

SRS-P Social Cognition

Parent

No Parent

626466687072747678

Pre-Test Post-test

SRS-

P So

cial

Com

mun

icat

ion

T Sc

ores

SRS-P Social Communication

Parent

No Parent

PEERS® Research Snapshot: School-Based Curriculum for Teens with ASD

(Laugeson, Tucci, Bolourian, Gantman, & Ellingsen, in preparation)

Page 11: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

11

1.551.6

1.651.7

1.751.8

1.851.9

1.95

Pre-Test Post-test

FQS

Con

flict

Raw

Sco

res

FQS Conflict

Parent

No Parent

3

3.1

3.2

3.3

3.4

3.5

3.6

Pre-Test Post-test

FQS

Com

pani

onsh

ip R

aws

Scor

es

FQS Companionship

Parent

No Parent

33.13.2

3.33.4

3.53.63.7

Pre-Test Post-test

FQS

Hel

pful

ness

Raw

Sc

ores

FQS Helpfulness

Parent

No Parent

PEERS® Research Snapshot: School-Based Curriculum for Teens with ASD

(Laugeson, Tucci, Bolourian, Gantman, & Ellingsen, in preparation)

PEERS® Research Snapshot: Long-term Follow-up Study

(Mandelberg, Laugeson, Cunningham, Ellingsen, Bates, & Frankel 2013)

• Data was collected 1-5 years post-treatment– T1 – Pre-test– T2 – Post-test – T3 – 1-5 year follow-up

• 53 of 82 potential subjects– 64% response rate

• No significant differences between participants and non-participants at baseline

• Mean age at follow-up:– 17.5 years old– 11.4 grade level

• Mean time to follow-up:– 29 months

PEERS® Research Snapshot: Long-term Follow-up Study

(Mandelberg, Laugeson, Cunningham, Ellingsen, Bates, & Frankel 2013)

Page 12: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

12

PEERS® Research Snapshot: Long-term Follow-up Study

(Mandelberg, Laugeson, Cunningham, Ellingsen, Bates, & Frankel 2013)

PEERS® Research Snapshot: Long-term Follow-up Study

(Mandelberg, Laugeson, Cunningham, Ellingsen, Bates, & Frankel 2013)

PEERS® Research Snapshot: Long-term Follow-up Study

(Mandelberg, Laugeson, Cunningham, Ellingsen, Bates, & Frankel 2013)

Page 13: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

13

UCLA PEERS® Research Partners• Seoul National University (South Korea)

– Randomized controlled trial (Yoo et al. 2014)– Teens with ASD– Korean manual published in 2013

• University of Calgary (Canada)– Adolescents and adults with ASD

• Cal Tech– Pre-post comparison of biomarkers– Predictors of treatment outcome

• Erasmus University (Holland)– Randomized controlled (Yulius Academy)– Teens with ASD– Dutch manual in preparation

• Bar Ilan University (Israel)– Manual translated into Hebrew– Randomized controlled trial– Teens with ASD

• Marquette University– Replication study – social anxiety and parenting

stress (Schohl et al. 2013; Karst et al. 2014)– EEG – first biomarker of treatment outcome

(Van Hecke et al. 2013)

Future ResearchACCEPTED

• PEERS dissemination project in the schools for teens with ASD

– Role-play videos (>100)– www.routledge.com/cw/laugeson

PROPOSED

• PEERS for Teens with Intellectual Disabilities

• Club PEERS – Maintenance program with booster

sessions• Camp PEERS• PEERS for Dating• PEERS for Careers

AcknowledgementsFunding Support

NIMH U54-MH-068172 (Sigman, PI) NIH T32 MH17140 (Leuchter, PI)Nathan & Lilly Shapell Foundation (Laugeson, PI)Semel Scholar Award (Laugeson, PI)Friends of the Semel Institute (Laugeson, PI)Organization for Autism Research (Gantman, PI)Shapell & Guerin Family Foundation (Laugeson, PI)Organization for Autism Research (Laugeson, PI)Lang Family Foundation (Laugeson, PI)

Research Collaborators

Fred Frankel, Ph.D., ABPP (co-developer)Andrew Leuchter, M.D. (post-doc mentor)Alex Gantman, Psy.D.Catherine Mogil, Psy.D.Helena Johnson, Ph.D.Josh Mandelberg, M.D.Mina Park, Ph.D.Enjey Lin, Ph.D.Jilly Chang, Ph.D.Jennifer Sanderson, Psy.D.

Administrative Support

Yasamine Bolourian, M.A.Jessica HopkinsShannon Bates, M.A.Lara Tucci, M.A.Ashley R. Dillon, Ph.D.Ruth Ellingsen, Ph.D.Clare GorospeJessie SanchezElina VeytsmanJames Yang

THG Research AssistantsMaria KrivStephen Kapp, Ph.D.Kaely Orenski, Psy.D.Georgia Yu, M.A.Dali TungJan StolpeDawn Mitchell, M.A.Rosanna Rivero, M.A.Mary Goodarzi, M.A.Alex FriedmanSarah Bohlman, M.A.Lindsay Henry, M.A.Summer VilkinsMaile Adolphson Horn, M.A.Michelle Jackson, M.A.Sarah Taylor, M.A.Melissa Wasserman, M.A.Lindsey Hughes, M.A.Ellie MellonDaniel Janulaitis, M.A.Rohini BagrodiaKathryn FitzpatrickTiana Bayrami, M.A.Jason TineroElizabeth Shipley, M.A.Khadija NoorbhaiCatherine WallaceMarlene CabreraRenee DoeAlexandra WalshMarina AvetisianMaria PizzanoEugene KutasevichMaricella CampuzanoLeijing Zhang

UCLA Research AssistantsJin Lee, Psy.D.Amanda LenvinCordelia RossKristine McGlennenJeff RudieNatalie ColichDana Lieberman, M.A.Siena Whitham, M.A.Allison VreelandLucy VoChloe KoefflerAlea Baron, M.A.Laura Knoll, M.A.Ahoo Karimian, M.A.Kathleen Jorgenson, M.A.Rebecca Fountain, M.A.Erin Cornack, M.A.Emily Chen, M.A.Kandyse ChristopherDevi Beck-PancerBen Schwartman, Ph.D.Elan Javanfard, M.A.Meredith Kalies, M.A.Meagan Cronin, M.A.Lyndsay Brooks, M.A.David Diaz, M.A.Cecilia Costa, M.A.Crystal Ferrendelli, M.A.Erin Santos, M.A.Danielle Missler, M.A.Cara LamFernanda SamaiaTony AbuyoAngela DahiyaJennifer Majdick

Page 14: The Science of Making Friends: The UCLA PEERS …ariconference.com/webinars/peers_overview.pdf · messaging, social networking sites § Online safety § Choosing appropriate friends

14

www.semel.ucla.edu/peers/[email protected]

310-26-PEERSFacebook, Twitter, Instagram:

UCLA PEERS