Upload
spencer-skinner
View
219
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE SCANDINAVIAN MODEL OF WELFARE:THE CASE OF DENMARK IN THE CURRENT CRISIS
Peter AbrahamsonSeoul National University
National Taiwan University
May 25th 2009
Introduction
Crisis symptoms are the same in Denmark as elsewhere:
Bank bankruptcies A ‘frozen’ housing market A slow down in economic activity => Rapidly increasing unemployment
Yet,
Well preparedness and
Robustness
2
Well preparedness: Recent welfare reforms
1994: Labor Market Reform
1997: Social Assistance Reform
2003: Start Allowance
2003: Welfare Reform Commission =>
2006: Welfare Reform
2007: Structural Reform:
2007: Labor Market Commission
3
Robustness
Many years of experience of handling social integration through public intervention
The so-called Scandinavian welfare regime
4
A very peculiar time when the crisis hit Denmark
September 2008:
Unemployment rate: 1.7 percent
Employment rate (16-64 men and women) 77.4
5
The Scandinavian Welfare Regime
universal and (therefore) expensive; tax financed; based on public provision of both transfers and
services; emphasizing personal social services vis-à-vis
transfers; provides high quality provision; has high compensation rates and is therefore
egalitarian; and is based on a high degree of labor market
participation for both sexes
6
‘...the Nordic model is about... universalism, generous benefits, social citizenship rights, dual-earner model, active labor market policies, and extensive social services’ (Joakim Palme 1999: 15) .
7
The Nordic countries are generally characterized by publicly funded and administered programs that have comprehensive and universal coverage and relatively egalitarian benefit structures. Traditionally, they have been supported by redistributive general taxes and strong work orientations, in terms of both programmatic emphasis on work and economic policies that stress full employment (Duane Swank 2000: 85).
8
Total Social Expenditure 1995 - 2006
9
1995 2000 2005 2006
In % of GDP 31.9 28.9 30,1 29.1
Index1995 = 100
100 90 94 91
Per capita at fixed 2006-prices PPP €
7.509 7.530 8.437 8.435
Functional distribution of social expenditure in Denmark, 2007, as percentage of GDP
Sickness Invalidity Old Age Families Employment
Housing Social Ass. Administration
6.1 4.2 10.7 3.7 1.6 0.7 0.7 0.8
10
Substantial change in distribution of financing
State Municipality & Region
Employers Employees
1987 43.8 39.8 11.7 4.71990 49.3 36.6 8.4 5.71995 39.3 35.1 10.9 14.72000 28.6 39.8 9.8 21.82004 26.8 41.2 19.9 21.02007 21.1 40.7 17.3 20.9
11
Absolute fertility rate 1901 -2008
12
Flexicurity
13
A flexible labor market?
14
15
Indeed
the Danish labor market is very flexible
16
A Generous Unemployment Benefit System?
On paper the Danish transfer payments to unemployed people look very good. There are no waiting days and in principle the amount is 90 percent of prior wage or salary. However, since there is a ceiling compensation is in average much lower:
1995 2004
Insured 67% 60%
Uninsured 47% 41%
Single parent 77% 69%
17
Generous, seems to be an exaggeration, specially concerning social assistance
Nevertheless, the benefit period may be said to be generous with respect to benefit period.
Within the unemployment insurance system one can receive benefits for a total of four years including periods of activation, and in principle social assistance can be received indefinitely
18
Evaluating Activation Measures
Interviews with the clients revealed that half of them did not see any aim of going through activation other than they had to in order to keep their benefits. When they were to judge the effects of activation they more often pointed to issues such as improvement of their every day life and self confidence than to issues of being qualified for regular employment
19
There appear to be rather limited effects of activation measures;
but one ‘curious’ effect has been identified by economists; one which they have labeled the ‘motivation effect’,
or as it would better be understood by sociologists: the ‘scare effect’
20
Unemployed people significantly increase their job search and hence employment when they approach the time of activation,
meaning that
the prospect of activation may be more effective than activation itself
21
‘…throughout the period [from 1994 and onward] the policy has included complementary elements of social disciplining and social integration. There is no doubt, however, that developments have been shifting from a significant focus on social integration to a much stronger emphasis on social disciplining’ (Larsen and Mailand 2007: 3)
22
Crisis governance: Government initiatives
On April 21st 2009 the newly appointed Prime Minister, Lars Løkke Rasmusen presented the government’s work program for the coming six months, and stated that
‘handling of the crisis is of course the totally dominating objective’ (Prime Minister’s Office 2009: 1; author’s translation)
23
Spring Package 2.0: Growth, Climate, Lower Taxes
It is expected that the tax reform will reduce income taxes by more than 28 billion DKK =>
1½ per cent of GDP (long-term, permanent effect)
24
The tax reform will reduce marginal personal income tax
and
Increase environmental taxes
25
Part of the agreement was also to return to citizens the earlier collected compulsory pension saving
Other elements concerned grants to renovation of own home
Enabling the municipalities to build more public housing
In short, the exercise was to increase private consumption substantially
26
Initiatives from the Ministry of Social Affairs
Fighting ghettoization and building more units Reducing the number of people facing eviction
from their apartment because of arrears Support to NGOs to establish debt counseling
services DKK 850 million in funds to enable the
municipalities to renovate and construct ‘citizen near’ institutions
27
Initiatives from the Ministry of Justice
A number of initiatives to combat the increasing gang violence
Essentially of the nature of sharpening punishments and increasing police work
28
Conclusion
With a high degree of certainty it can be expected that the initiatives taken together will:
Increase private consumption substantially
It is, however, much more uncertain whether that will lead to
an increase in domestic production/growth or to
an increase in imports?
29
With a high degree of certainty it can be expected that
the many initiatives to increase activity within construction renovation and building
will reduce unemployment in the sectors that are the hardest hit
30
With a high degree of certainty it can be expected that
Tax reductions disproportionately will benefit the better off and hence increase inequality
31
Income poverty/relative poverty and inequality have been on the increase since the mid 1990s
Gini coefficient 1996: 20
2006: 24
At-risk-of-poverty 1994: 7% (10%)
2006: 10 % (12%)
Poverty 1994: 3.6%
2006: 5%
32
Given the very low level of inequality and poverty,
and especially the very small prevalence of long-term unemployment and long-term poverty the increases are not expected to spill over into less social cohesion
33
Flexicurity is delivering, yet it comes with a price:
Marginalization of the least productive
34
In line with the general idea behind the universal welfare state that services should benefit all or most of the population the Danish government has chosen to govern crisis intervention to the benefit of the population at large instead of targeting the unemployed and the marginalized. The philosophy seems to be that the rising tide will lift all ships, small as well as big ones. But it could only do so because of the very favorable situation which prevailed when the crisis reached Denmark
35
Thank you very much for your attention
36