2
Roots Report 36 % Based on our Intervention System Fidelity Evaluation, observations, and discussions looking across the 7 pillars of effective intervention systems, we have determined your Intervention System Fidelity Score as a school to be: 36% A healthy intervention system should have an overall score of 90% or above. Below we have organized our findings across each of the 7 pillars of effective intervention, along with the correlating fidelity score. Findings and Recommendations Screening for At- Risk Students Primary Instruction/ Core Curriculum (Tier 1) Supplemental Intervention (Tier 2/3) Planning Supplemental Intervention (Tier 2/3) Progress Monitoring Supplemental Intervention (Tier 2/3) Implementation Systems and Infrastructure Meeting Quality The Roots Report Evaluate and improve the health of your schools’ intervention systems. In order to help you understand and evaluate the intervention system at each of your schools, we’ve created the Branching Minds Roots Survey, that examines the 7 critical components of effective intervention systems. The Roots Report was extremely informative and eye-opening for my team. Sherri Yagley, Chief Information Officer and District Data Coach Johnson City Central School District (NY) This 20-minute survey is completed by one representative from each school. Branching Minds then analyzes and compiles the results into a report outlining a quantitative score for each area as well as a growth plan with actionable recommendations for improvement. The findings of the report are then shared and discussed with a representative from the district. The Roots Report Can be purchased on its own, or as part of the implementation of the Branching Minds platform. Use a consistent and quantifiable framework for evaluating the health of your intervention system Understand the strengths and challenges of your intervention system at each school Screening for At-risk students 1 Primary instruction/Core Curriculum 2 Systems and Infrastructure 6 Intervention Planning 3 Meeting Quality 7 Intervention Implementation 4 5 Intervention Progress Monitoring 56 % 70 % 42 % 17 % 18 % 20 % 27 %

The Roots Report - · PDF fileRoots Report 36% Based on our Intervention System Fidelity Evaluation, observations, and discussions looking across the 7 pillars of effective intervention

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Roots Report 36%

Based on our Intervention System Fidelity Evaluation, observations, and

discussions looking across the 7 pillars of effective intervention systems, we

have determined your Intervention System Fidelity Score as a school to be: 36%

A healthy intervention system should have an overall score of 90% or above.

Below we have organized our findings across each of the 7 pillars of effective

intervention, along with the correlating fidelity score.

Findings and Recommendations

Screening for At-Risk Students

Primary Instruction/

Core Curriculum (Tier 1)

Supplemental Intervention (Tier

2/3) Planning

Supplemental Intervention (Tier

2/3) Progress Monitoring

Supplemental Intervention

(Tier 2/3) Implementation

Systems and Infrastructure

Meeting Quality

The Roots ReportEvaluate and improve the health of your schools’ intervention systems.

In order to help you understand and evaluate the intervention system at each of your schools, we’ve

created the Branching Minds Roots Survey, that examines the 7 critical components of effective

intervention systems.

The Roots Report was extremely informative and eye-opening for my team.Sherri Yagley, Chief Information Officer and District Data Coach

Johnson City Central School District (NY)

This 20-minute survey is completed by one

representative from each school. Branching

Minds then analyzes and compiles the results

into a report outlining a quantitative score for

each area as well as a growth plan with

actionable recommendations for improvement.

The findings of the report are then shared and

discussed with a representative from the

district.

The Roots Report Can be purchased on its own,

or as part of the implementation of the

Branching Minds platform.

Use a consistent and quantifiable framework for evaluating the health of your intervention system

Understand the strengths and challenges of your intervention system at each school

Screening for At-risk students1

Primary instruction/Core Curriculum2

Systems and Infrastructure6

Intervention Planning3

Meeting Quality7

Intervention Implementation4

5 Intervention Progress Monitoring

56% 70% 42% 17% 18% 20% 27%

Identify actionable steps to improve the health of your intervention system

ABOUT US

A former classroom teacher, Maya created Branching Minds to bring learning scientists and learning specialists together with new technology to help struggling students succeed.

Maya GatFounder & CEO

Bob Pasternack, Ph.D.Advisor

Former Assistant Secretary for the Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services at the U.S. Department of Education. Led the reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA) and implementation of No Child Left Behind (NCLB).

Eva Dundas, PhDChief Learning Officer

Eva uses her academic training in neuroscience and child development to ground the Branching Minds work in the latest research.

branchingminds.com(646) [email protected]

Fidelity Assessment Score 23%

Lincoln Middle School

Fidelity Assessment Score 85%

Jefferson Elementary

2016201520162015

Roots Report

Roots Report

A. Recommended activities to improve:

1. Determine Cut Scores for tier 2 and 3 using Star Reading and Math2. Establish Universal Screener for Behavior (Use of Branching Minds)

a. Determine Cut Scores for tier 2 and 3 using Behavior Uni Screener b. Develop system for administration and implementation of behavior screener

B. Professional Development Areas: Administration, interpretation and use of Universal Screeners

56% — Screening for At-Risk Students

Measure intervention system growth from year to year

1 National Center on Response to Intervention (August 2011). RTI Essential Components Integrity Worksheet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs, National Center on Response to Intervention.

2 Johnson, E., Mellard, D.F., Fuchs, D., & McKnight, M.A. (2006). Responsiveness to intervention (RTI): How to do it. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities.

SCIENCE & RESEARCH