Upload
martin-patrick
View
17
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Final research paper for the MLIS degree at Kent State, written under the supervision of Dr. Donald Wicks.
Citation preview
Author: Martin Patrick Title: The role of the internet in the sermon preparation task Semester: Spring Year: 2014 Advisor: Dr. Donald Wicks
ABSTRACT
Human information behavior is an oft-studied area of research within the domain of library and information science. While methods exist to study the information behavior of professional knowledge workers, clergy have been infrequently studied. Most studies have happened within the past 15 years, yet most of these studies have not focused on how the internet is shaping the professional tasks of clergy, specifically the task of sermon preparation. Like humanists, clergy may rely on the invisible college, primary sources, personal collections, and solitary research. As will be seen in the literature, clergy have also been shown to rely on the Bible, the Holy Spirit, and prayer. This study explores the Internet as an information channel that is used by professionals (clergy) in a work-related task (sermon preparation). Clergy lack dedicated specialized libraries that cater to their information needs. Once graduated from seminary, they may have access to electronic resources or distance (by mail) lending privileges. This is far cry from the situation for medical practitioners or lawyers, for instance, for whom special libraries are highly developed and accessible. Thus in some ways, the rise of the Internet could be a boon to clergy seeking information beyond their main sources of information according to previous literature: their personal collection of material and their network of colleagues. Do clergy take advantage of the Internet in preparing their weekly sermon material, and if so, how do they do so? Does the Internet compliment their personal collection and the role of colleagues?
THE ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN THE SERMON PREPARATION TASK
A Masters Research Paper submitted to the
Kent State University School of Library And Information Science
In partial fulfillment of the requirements For the degree Master of Library and Information Science
By
Martin Patrick
May 2014
Masters Research Paper by
Martin Patrick
M.A., Luther Seminary, 2010
B.A., Valparaiso University, 2006
Approved by
Advisor______________________________________________________Date_____________
ii
Contents
Chapter 1 ............................................................................................................................. 1
Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1
Chapter 2 ............................................................................................................................. 2
Literature Review............................................................................................................ 2
Information Behavior of Professionals ........................................................................... 2
Information Behavior of Humanists ............................................................................... 5
Information Behavior of Theologians and Clergy .......................................................... 7
Summary Discussion .................................................................................................... 10
Chapter 3 ........................................................................................................................... 12
Methodology ................................................................................................................. 12
Chapter 4 ........................................................................................................................... 14
Findings......................................................................................................................... 14
The Task of Sermon Preparation .................................................................................. 14
Use of Resources........................................................................................................... 16
Internet Resources ..................................................................................................... 17
Openness to resources ............................................................................................... 18
Prayer and the Holy Spirit......................................................................................... 19
A Sermon Preparation Model ................................................................................... 19
Chapter 5 ........................................................................................................................... 20
Conclusions ................................................................................................................... 20
References ......................................................................................................................... 23
Appendix A ....................................................................................................................... 26
Appendix B ....................................................................................................................... 27
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 1
Chapter 1
Introduction
Research into human information behavior (HIB) is quite prevalent. Indeed, half a
decade ago a prominent thinker suggested that there may be at least 10,000 published pieces on
the topic (Case, 2007). In response to the massive volume of studies, another prominent thinking
has suggested that small studies of specific user groups should be replaced by large-scale studies
of human information behavior geared towards business and governmental policy because
investigators [will] discover that there is little new that can be said (Wilson, 2010). While it
may be true that some groups have been over analyzed, Penner's (2009) recently published
literature review has revealed the lack of studies that focus on professional theologians. Penner
has shown that there is room for growth in the realm of practitioners of theology.
This study situates itself primarily under that broad umbrella of information behavior as it
relates to the study and use of theology. More specifically, it explores the needs of clergy and
how they use modern tools like the Internet to prepare sermons. While the literature on
professional theologians may be sparse, this study also draws on studies of human information
behavior in several other contexts. Studies outside the direct realm of theology can, as Penner
argues, provide helpful guidance for research design and serve as a sounding board for result
comparisons. These include studies of humanities scholars and other humanists as well as other
professionals. The information use environment of the population under investigation here
suggests a foundation of the overlap and interplay of those broader populations, which have
generally been studied in isolation of each other.
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 2
Chapter 2
Literature Review
Information Behavior of Professionals
Human information behavior has been the subject of inquiry for a very long time. Over
time, inquiry shifted as information technology shifted, and eventually settled into two camps in
the 1980s: the system-centered approach and the user-centered approach. An important concept
that appears today in both systems-centered (such as deep log analysis) and user-centered
approaches is that of the context or the environment in which the user or users under study work
or live. As I will explore, within each environment are roles that have tasks that prompt
information behavior to occur.
The information behavior of professionals (those who are trained and have a large body
of knowledge to master in order to provide service) can be generalized into a basic model, an
idea that stands out in the research on professional theologians (i.e., clergy). Since students
enrolled in seminary education are seeking to become, in some way, practicing theologians, it is
important to understand the information behavior of professional theologians so that it can be
seen if seminary students engage in information behavior in the same way. Seminary students
enrolled in online programs also have roles and tasks that overlap with graduate students, online
and distance students, and humanities researchers (hereafter, humanists) in general.
Taylor (1991) proposed the idea of information use environments (IUE) that affect the
flow and use of information and that determine the judgment criteria to which the value of
information is judged. Within each IUE there are sets of people, typical structures of problems,
typical settings in which information is sought, and typical resolutions to those problems. Thus,
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 3
each IUE is unique and has within it a developed set of problems and a developed way to solve
those problems. Taylor argues that by focusing on such issues, one can better compare one user
with another from a different IUE. Or to put it another way, a doctors information use
environment leads to information behavior that is different from that of a lawyers that is
different from that of, for my paper, a clergy member.
Leckie, Pettigrew, & Sylvain (1996) published work that analyzed information seeking
behavior of professionals with an eye towards developing a generalized model. Their work,
using previous studies on engineers, health care professionals, and lawyers identified the idea of
each professional environment having various and complex work roles, with every work role
having a set of tasks associated with it. Work roles can be grouped across professions as service
providers, administrator, researcher, educator, and learner. Any of these tasks can prompt the
professional to engage in information behavior, which is subject to variables that intervene to
help or hinder the process on its way to becoming an outcome. At the outcome stage of the
model, the research can either be satisfied and finished, or can feel more information need and
re-enter the loop.
Two important factors that influence information behavior of professionals are sources of
information and awareness of information. Sources can be internal, such as previous knowledge
and experience, or external, such as journal articles, books, etc. Awareness of information
broadly means that the professional knows where to find information and has ascribed certain
factors such as trust, ease, cost, and quality to it. Professionals will consult a source of
information if they are familiar with it and if it is convenient, an idea often called the principle of
least effort (or, in behavioral terms, satisficing) over another source of information that they
are not familiar with.
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 4
Bystrm & Hansen (2005) sought to better define task, since they have found that
previous literature uses the term for both an abstract concept and as a concrete set of actions.
Work tasks are performed in fulfillment of a job, or profession, and it is guided by the norms of
that organization or profession; its information use environment. Further, tasks are readily
broken into sub-tasks that must be accomplished in order to reach the desired outcome. Thus
information-seeking tasks are sub-tasks that are intimately connected to the task of the user and
not independent tasks that can be studied in isolation of the information use environment. They
also have found that people will tend to rely more on sources they are already familiar with.
More recent inquiries into the information lives of professionals has tended to focus on
health care professionals. Like clergy, doctors and nurses have many work roles that overlap
each other and that overlap with other professionals work roles. Recognizing the yes and the no
of the metaphor, in some ways sitting down with a patient to discuss a diagnosis is akin to a
sermon. In other important ways, as we will see however, clergy are unique in that they do not
have access to specialized libraries dedicated to their information needs. In fact, in medicine, the
National Network of Libraries of Medicine have published guidelines for accrediting hospital
libraries, and have recently updated those guidelines to account for the role of the Internet in
health professionals information needs (Bandy et al., 2008, p. 200). Yet perhaps because of the
solitary nature of clergys professional roles and tasks, there are no such guidelines for providing
library services to clergy apart from affiliation possibilities through the seminary from which
they graduated.
The information use environment of the individual is the foundation to a proper
explanation of their information behavior. Any IUE has a set of norms that guide how
individuals seek and use information, and those actions are actually sub-tasks of a broader work-
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 5
related task or goal. Professionals information behavior is related to the task upon which they
are focusing at any given time. Using Leckie, Pettigrew, and Sylvains delineations, the sermon
preparation task can be seen encompassing the research and the education roles of the
professional. The information behavior the clergy engage in to prepare a sermon are sub-tasks of
sermon preparation, as it also involves writing and speaking, and not just information gathering
and assimilation. Another key finding from these studies is that users will tend to prefer
information that they are already familiar with because this information presents little obstacle to
incorporate it into the individuals desired outcome.
Information Behavior of Humanists
Most clergy members, particularly in the mainline denominations in the United States
(Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, Roman Catholic Church, Episcopal Church, etc.),
attended seminary before receiving a call and ordination into the practice of theology as clergy
members. Seminary in the United States functions as graduate-level training, granting the
Master of Divinity degree (MDiv) upon its graduates. Most mainline denominations require
clergy to have earned this degree, or an equivalent. Thus it is not unreasonable to assume that
clergy prepared with graduate-level training in the humanities discipline of theology would share
characteristic behavior with others who have received graduate-level training in a humanities
discipline. It is to the behavior of humanities scholars and researchers that we now turn.
Wiberley & Jones (2000) published their findings of a decade-long study on how
humanists interact with electronic information sources. Their research uncovered that for
humanists the use of technology in information behavior was governed by time: the anticipated
start-up time, the actual start-up time, and the use time. Additionally, they found that the time of
life in the researcher was a significant factor in the usage of electronic resources. They also note
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 6
that humanities researchers and teachers are more likely than those in the natural or social
sciences to work alone, even though they do frequently consult with colleagues and assistants.
This is a major factor in the importance of time to the information behavior of humanists. Thus,
the limitations of time limit the amount and the kind of research that the scholar engages in,
emphasizing why the principle of least effort (or terms like convenience and accessibility) is so
frequently an influence of information behavior.
Ellis & Oldman (2005) studied how English literature researchers information behavior
may have changed as a result of the electronic information revolution. They found that for
English literature researchers, the ability to use e-mail to communicate and collaborate with
scholars around the world has led to more coauthorship of material. At the time, the scholars
studied were not comfortable publishing in electronic journals nor did they hold electronic
journals in high esteem. The scholars expressed skepticism about electronic, or digital, libraries
because they were concerned they would lose the ability to browse the material in familiar ways,
and because to them the object under study is not just the content, but the carrier of the content as
well. Thus they are comfortable using the Internet for communication and collaboration, as well
as in a limited way finding material, but ultimately in 2005, this group of humanist scholars held
electronic resources in low esteem.
Five years later, at least one generation in the life of the Internet Ge (2010) studied 30
social science and humanities scholars interaction with electronic resources in their information
lives . While the web was considered the most important single tool by the researchers (with
96.7% using it, and 48% using it at least daily), problems encountered included overload and
issues of authority and validity. Second to the web in importance were subject databases, which
created self-perceived problems of inadequate search skills and lack of awareness of appropriate
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 7
databases. Electronic journals were the third most-used resource due to the ability to browse the
table of contents much like a print journal, though researchers were concerned about the age of
the material available. Ge then compared print and electronic journal usage, and found that for
scholars in history, literature, and philosophy, only 30-40% of their needs were satisfied by
electronic journals. Ge also found that the more experienced the researcher, interestingly, the
more likely that print and electronic journals would share equally in fulfilling the information
need, while less experienced researchers tended to prefer print. The preference by a more
experienced scholar for electronic resources was based on accessibility, when accessibility is not
an issue.
Thus if humanists have time constraints, and will use the information resources most
readily available to them, it is no surprise that clergy will rely on their local colleagues and their
personal libraries to fulfill their needs, as we will see in the literature. Since they lack dedicated
libraries conveniently accessible in person or even online, those are the two most accessible
resources, beyond prior knowledge.
Information Behavior of Theologians and Clergy
At least as far back as 1944, researchers were interested in clergy as a group to study for
information habits, although most of the early attempts were focused simply on reading habits
(Lancour, 1944). The published record, however, is scant prior to Wicks (1999). A study
undertaken in 1990 sought to understand the role of libraries and computers in the information
lives of clergy (Gorman, 1990) however this study happened before the emergence of what we
know as the Internet.
Wicks paper focused on the work roles of clergy as those roles interacted with their
work world. Wicks identified three roles, preacher, caregiver, and administrator; perhaps (in
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 8
order), educator, service provider, and administrator, as Leckie et al.s model suggests. The
three worlds of the pastor are theological, denominational, and congregational. Wicks
proposition is that there are instances in which a member of the clergy closes the information
behavior off to persons who groups who are part of one or more of the clergy members worlds.
The results suggest that the more extreme a theological position, the more likely the pastor is to
operate closed off to all resources except those from within the theological world while engaged
in information behavior for the role of preacher. For the roles of caregiver and administrator, the
results suggest a stronger hesitancy to openness across the theological spectrum. The effect of
the denominational world was generally mixed for the three roles, and the congregational world
was generally open across the three roles.
Michels has undertaken several studies in this area in the last decade (2005, 2009, 2011,
2012). In 2005 he explored the role of people as information sources for biblical studies
researchers. The kind of information sought and received tended towards affirmation and
evaluation from colleagues. In 2009 he published on how a pastor used the Internet as a
response to an article cautioning about how the Internet could negatively impact this task.
Michels respondent articulated two modes of information behavior: the personal, which was
termed devotional, and the work task-related, which was termed intentional. For sermon
preparation, this respondent began with the Bible, and then turns to colleagues, bookstores, and
online sources to locate relevant material. The respondent noted that the Internet afforded the
ability to find hundreds of unique commentaries on a given passage instantly, though he also
noted the importance of time on any research. The respondent also used social network sites,
such as Facebook, to engage with colleagues. As for determining the validity of a resource, the
respondent judged a resource by its orthodoxy, or as the respondent said, its theological
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 9
perimeters.
Michels next turned to the role of prayer in information seeking by clergy (2011). He
found prayer to function for clergy as a means of both information gathering and
interpretation/discernment; or refinement. The individuals studied believed prayer to be an
important information resource, even though Michels respondent from 2009 noted that the
Internet had somewhat undermined his reliance on prayer for sermon preparation due to the time
saved using the Internet to gather information. Taken together, Michels work reveals that clergy
significantly rely on the invisible college, and that prayer is accepted as an information source.
This reinforces the unique information environment that practicing theologians work within.
Roland (2008), studying the sermon preparation task, argues that even within a
denominational context, individuals are unique and thus the same biblical text in the same
denomination can give rise to myriad sermons. Roland finds that his informant engages in
sermon preparation in collaboration with the Holy Spirit, echoing the idea of the invisible college
and presaging Michels finding that prayer is a significant information source for people of faith
when engaging in information behavior.
In a reassessment of Wicks, Roland (2012) argues that Wicks results regarding the
influence of the congregational world were misleading. Roland found that clergy do not go
outside the congregational world for information where the congregational world and the
preaching role intersect. Roland also argues strongly for an interview-centric methodology over
the survey approach employed by Wicks and others.
Curran and Burns (2011) articulate seven roles of the Catholic clergy member in his
decision making process, rather than his information seeking process with a specific eye towards
the role of librarians for clergy. One of the constants in the literature is the lack of role of the
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 10
library in the information behavior of practicing theologians. Catholic clergy use print resources
frequently, specifically their own, and rely on the invisible college and the Internet. They found
no respondent mentioning the word library as a component of their information behavior in their
professional decision making. Curran and Burns raise the idea that seminary librarians and
faculty can benefit from understanding how clergy go about their information behavior in order
to design better courses and systems.
For clergy, there are overlaps with humanists and other professionals. The issue of time
constraint is apparent in the literature, as is the ease with which tasks can be theoretically defined
in the professional capacity of the clergy member. Like humanists, clergy make strong use of the
invisible college as part of their information behavior. Unlike those outside of practicing clergy,
however, there is a reliance on prayer and the prominent focus on a single resource, the Bible.
When studied in terms of their engagement with the Internet, clergy have been seen to use it the
way humanists use the Internet: for networking and for locating resources, although this appears
to often only happen within the theological perimeters of the denomination. Michels 2009
study uncovered that his respondent sought out commentaries from other theologians on the
Internet, creating a new kind of network of colleagues.
Summary Discussion
One of the predominant findings in the study of professionals and humanists is the idea of
least effort. People engaged in information behavior will gravitate towards sources or resources
that require the least amount of effort to use. These include sources that the individual already
knows, trusts, and values. In the case of clergy, this means their personal collection as well as
the confines of a particular tradition. A second common finding across professionals and clergy
is using colleagues and other individuals as the invisible college to help refine and shape
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 11
information needs. Also important, according to the literature, are the unique variables of the
Holy Spirit and prayer in the information use environment of individuals of faith.
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 12
Chapter 3
Methodology
Eight members of the clergy were contacted and listened to explanations of the project,
and five clergy agreed to participate in the study. These five clergy were all from different
denominational backgrounds. One came from the Roman Catholic (RCC), one from the
Episcopal (EC), one from the Lutheran (ELCA), one from the Evangelical Free Church in
America (EFCA), and one from the Assembly of God tradition (AG). All five clergy are
currently serving a congregation. Clergy averaged 26.6 years of experience (most experience 36
years, least experience 7 years), and four of the five were men. After obtaining a signature on
the consent form (Appendix A), four interviews took place in person, and one took place over the
phone, lasting between 30 and 55 minutes each. Conversations were not recorded, and notes
were taken on a legal pad. Immediately following the interviews, the notes were transcribed into
a text file stored locally on a flash drive, and some data were entered into a spreadsheet, also
stored on the same flash drive.
The mix of questions (Appendix B) was designed to answer several broad questions: do
clergy use the Internet more than print-based resources, has the Internet changed sermon
preparation for clergy who have been serving since before the Internet, and are clergy aware of
the resources available to them online or through their seminary alma maters. Additionally, I
was able to develop a rudimentary model of sermon preparation in the age of the Internet based
on the conversations. While it was not asked, I listened very closely for mentions by the clergy
of relying on prayer and/or the Holy Spirit (Michels, 2009) as either part of the sermon
preparation task or even as an information resource. I first turn to report how pastors talk about
preparing sermons, because their preparation approaches form the basis for what resources they
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 13
use and how they use those resources.
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 14
Chapter 4
Findings
The Task of Sermon Preparation
All five clergy interviewed agree on one thing the basis of any sermon is a text from the
Bible. For the clergy aligned with what I call a mainstream denomination (Roman Catholic,
Episcopal, and Lutheran (Evangelical Lutheran Church in America), following the Revised
Common Lectionary formed the basis of sermon preparation work. The Revised Common
Lectionary provides a three-year series of readings divided up by seasons of the calendar year
(Christmas, Lent, Easter, etc.). Each Sunday, readings from the prose sections of the Old
Testament, from the Psalms, from a non-Gospel New Testament reading, and from a Gospel
reading are pre-selected. The Roman Catholic, the Lutheran, and the Episcopal clergy then
choose either an individual reading from these texts, or find a theme that connects the readings
together. This passage or theme forms the basis for the sermon preparation.
For the two clergy from smaller denominations, Assembly of God (AG) and the
Evangelical Free Church in America (EFCA), readings and passages are chosen by the pastor.
The EFCA member preached in series that were thematic or were explorations of Biblical books.
AG preferred self-described loose themes that allowed the pastor to respond to situations in the
church and the world as those things happened, rather than plotting out a more formal series of
sermons that build upon one another. In both cases, developing the series took place well in
advance, even though work on any given sermon did not begin in earnest until the week before
the sermon was to be preached.
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 15
The next step for all pastors was what RC referred to as percolation while EC called it
sitting with the text. This is the stage during which clergy seek out information resources. All
clergy sit with the text during the week before the sermon is to be preached, regardless of
whether they plan a series or follow the Revised Common Lectionary. It is during the
percolation stage that some clergy specifically mention prayer or the Holy Spirit as a primary
resource for the task of sermon preparation. Three out of the five (EC, ELCA, EFCA) pastors
mentioned one or both of these.
The intended outcome of the sermon also affects the sermon preparation task. RCC
described a blow-up clown with sand in its feet to weight it down, which when punched would
rock back-and-forth until finally settling into a stable position. Thus RCC liked to give a little
punch with the sermon and hoped that parishioners would think about it and go back-and-forth
until finally settling into what it means. EC mentioned a partial desire for a pedagogical
outcome, while EFCA, ELCA, and AG expressed desire to move parishioners into
understanding how the text of the sermon was important in their lives. All five pastors agreed
with the general premise, as stated by RCC, that sermons are not lectures.
Another key factor in preparing a sermon that affects resources used is the audience. AG
made clear that a church made up of rural farmers is not impressed by material that might be
found in scholarly journals. EC, on the other hand, felt that the congregation of a small,
Midwestern college town is more interested in the technical nuances of any given Biblical text.
RCC, EC, and EFCA all agreed that being in a town full of students and professors meant that
they had to be more careful with what they said, what sources they used to support their sermon,
and the accuracy of any factual information they might use. AG and ELCA do not believe that
their churches have people who are as concerned that way.
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 16
Generalizing towards a model of the sermon preparation task from these responses,
pastors know well in advance what the basis for each weeks sermon is going to be. The week
before the sermon they spend much of the time in the percolation stage, which is a stage of
exploring ideas and verifying or refining those ideas through resources. To borrow from
Kuhlthaus work, this is the exploration zone; during which clergy read widely and spend time
reflecting (Kuhlthau, 1994). As will be seen, when those resources are Internet-based, they tend
to be used quickly to fact-check. When the clergy desires deeper engagement, the clergy turns to
print resources.
Use of Resources
The clergy interviewed for this project expressed similar preferences for resources. In
general, these clergy preferred print resources, except for ELCA who expressed a 60%-40% split
in favor of Internet-based resources. When clergy turn to the Internet, it is usually either to
verify information or to find a nugget of inspiration. Clergy mentioned wanting to look up the
correct attribution of a quote, for example. Clergy also use the Internet to find inspiration for
their sermons through prominent preachers who have posted sermons or ideas online. The bulk
of the sermon preparation task happens offline through the percolation stage and the writing
out of notes and manuscripts to prepare the sermon. Internet usage consists of quick hits and
searches, and except for ELCA the clergy struggled to name sites that might have relevant
resources for their sermon preparation.
Clergy preferred print-based resources on the whole and continue to rely on their own
libraries, either stored at the church or housed at home, and their own purchases. Clergy still
make no use of libraries for sermon preparation, even if services are available to them, such as
databases through the public library or lending by mail or database access through their
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 17
seminarys library. ELCA and EFCA were open to library-based resources in the preparation of
Bible study material, however.
When it comes to deciding whether or not a resource is appropriate, all five clergy
explicitly mentioned the author of the work as the single most important factor. If the author is
unknown, they may consider the publisher of a printed work, or they will scan the resource. As
ELCA said, I can tell within two paragraphs if its something I want to use. RCC expressed
the most openness, mentioning explicitly Jewish resources. All clergy, however, indicated that
they wished they were more open to resources outside of their denomation.
Internet Resources
Clergy make use of general tools to help in the sermon preparation task. Searching
Google and using a tool like Evernote to capture ideas are the most frequently cited uses of the
Internet. When asked about what sites clergy might use that have a potential role in sermon
preparation, RCC, AG, and ELCA had several resources they regularly used online. EC and
EFCA struggled to name any websites, blogs, or email newsletters they used regularly or that
might be relevant. No pastor could name a single library-provided database, such as
ATLASerials or something more general like Academic Search Complete. The Internet-based
resources explicitly named include: Blue Letter Bible, TextWeek.com, SermonCentral.com, and
TorahFax. Clergy also named people responsible for certain blogs or websites by name, rather
than the name of the website.
Social media usage in the task of sermon preparation was little to nonexistent. At its best,
for RCC it serves as a means of feedback after the sermon has been delivered. For ELCA, there
might be illustrations from time-to-time that are discovered on a Facebook wall. For the
remaining clergy, there is almost no usage of a social media network in the sermon task. The
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 18
offline version of a social network, the homiletic or sermon preparation group was also not
something most of these clergy made use of. ELCA attends weekly, and RCC had been involved
in such a group, but EFCA, EC, and AG had never been involved much.
There were two general perspectives on the Internet. The first, espoused especially by
EC, is that the Internet is full of material that is too shallow or difficult to verify. AG also
expressed the sentiment that its too easy to get distracted by the hyperlinked nature of resources
on the Internet. However, AG also stated that the Internet has changed everything and that all
the content in books that AG has purchased and used over the years is almost entirely available
online now. ELCA also said that the Internet played an important role as a clearinghouse of
information because its all there and expressed the idea that if you cant find it on
textweek.com, its probably not out there.
Openness to resources
All five clergy expressed openness to resources. When asked, the clergy indicated that as
long as they felt the resource met their need for illustrations or ideas, and was in line with their
goals and theological predisposition, they were open to any publisher or author. RCC explicitly
talked about going outside of Christendom and relying on Jewish resources for helping to
prepare a sermon that went along with RCCs churchs Passover seder. Most clergy however
interpreted, and answered, the question along the lines of, for instance, whether the resource was
from within their denomination or not. In that sense, clergy were open to resources from
extradenominational resources, such as ELCA who was open to resources from other
denominations even when it was apparent to ELCA that those resources were not from the
Lutheran tradition. The Lutheran tradition is an interesting case, as there are three predominant
strands of Lutheranism in the United States: the ELCA, the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod,
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 19
and the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran Synod. ELCA mentioned being open to LCMS
material but did not mention WELS.
Prayer and the Holy Spirit
EC, EFCA, and ELCA all mentioned the role of prayer or the Holy Spirit in the sermon
preparation task, specifically during the percolation stage. RCC and AG did not mention either
of these things when talking about how they prepare a sermon or when asked about primary
resources for sermon preparation help. AG expressed the idea that there is a myth of the pastor
moved by the Spirit immediately prior to the sermon, but that AG has discovered that there is
always a significant amount of work involved in preparing notes, outlines, or manuscripts to be
delivered as sermons.
A Sermon Preparation Model
After interviewing five clergy from different denominations, there is an opportunity to
propose a model of sermon preparation from this data. All clergy are aware well in advance
what the Bible texts for each Sunday will be. For those who follow the Revised Common
Lectionary, this information is known years in advance. For those who plan their own series,
this information is known at least several months in advance. Clergy begin preparing the sermon
about one week before preaching it, usually beginning on Monday and have the bulk of the
sermon in place, either in writing or as notes, by Thursday of that week. The first step is to read
the texts themselves. The biggest phase of the process is the 'percolation' stage in which the
pastor reflects on the material and gathers information resources, either from books, the Internet,
or prayer. This stage usually takes between two and four days, with only one pastor letting it
continue until the day before the sermon is to be preached.
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 20
Chapter 5
Conclusions
Along the way to findings related to the role of the Internet, this study confirmed some
previous findings. The most common finding in the study of pastors has been the lack of library
usage. None of the pastors interviewed currently make use of any library provided resources in
their sermon preparation, including any databases such as ATLA Serials. This includes public
libraries, local academic libraries, and alma mater seminary libraries who may in fact offer
services to their alumni.
The pastors from the mainline denominations, RCC, EC, and ELCA, all were aware of
sermon preparation groups and RCC and ELCA had participated in them in the past. However,
only ELCA participates currently, and EFCA and AG were not aware of local groups nor had
ever participated in such groups. This subtly confirms previous findings about the importance of
the 'invisible college,' but its importance seems to be waning in the present age. Social media,
perhaps the modern invisible college, usage for sermon preparation related activities was non-
existent. RCC commented that Facebook provided a feedback mechanism, but otherwise no
pastor used Facebook, Twitter, Google+ or any other such service in any meaningful way in
sermon preparation.
In line with Michels' 2009 study, several pastors independently asserted the role of prayer
and/or the Holy Spirit. EC, ELCA, and EFCA all mentioned the significance of these in
preparing a sermon without any prompting. All three spoke about this topic in terms of a
resource like most of the resources they spoke of on the Internet. The Holy Spirit functions as an
inspiration and as a refiner of ideas. This happens during the percolation stage most often, but as
ELCA humorously put it, if there are no ideas by Saturday then prayer becomes the primary
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 21
information resource.
Tallying up the Internet-based resources designed for pastors that the five pastors
mentioned yields 10 websites or services. Intriguingly, each service received one mention by
one pastor; none of the pastors visit the same sites or get the same email newsletters. One pastor,
EC, could not name a single website, only the names of the people responsible it. ELCA also
named a few sites based on the responsible party rather than the name of the site or service itself.
RCC was the only pastor who named an emailed newsletter.
Pastors, all-in-all, use resources from people they trust. Whether that resource is a book,
online, or in person, if the pastor does not know and trust the author they will rely on other
factors like publisher, denominational affiliation of the author, and then possibly subjective
factors like the title of the book (ELCA). The converse also appears to be true: any resource by
an author that pastor trusts will be accessed or purchased and used, regardless of the medium.
The findings of this and other prior studies suggest the lack of a role libraries play in the
sermon preparation task. However, this study uncovered the relatively minor role that Internet-
based resources designed for pastors also play in sermon preparation. While it might seem like
the Internet can offer a replacement in some ways for a physical library, most pastors rely on
general services like Google or Wikipedia to find out or confirm information, and other services
like Evernote to store information for later use. The Internet is overall just another place to find
resources by authors the pastor trusts. There appears to be an almost bookstore mentality, in that
the pastor will browse for resources based on the author.
The Internet serves as a chief source of cheap information. One of the pastors mentioned
the unreliable nature of information on the Internet, but pastors appear to feel comfortable with
sources like Wikipedia as generally trustworthy. Several pastors did mention the quality of the
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 22
information on the Internet as part of their preference for physical carriers.
Seeking out and finding information resources is not a significant part of the sermon
preparation task according to this data. Of that subtask, the Internet plays a generative and
factual role for pastors. Pastors acknowledge sources, but the sermon preparation task is not
analogous to academic research, which is possibly how sermon creation is presented during
seminary when it is an academic class.
Seminary libraries should implement a form of information literacy that helps pastors
clarify their preferences for information resources of Internet based sites. Because pastors do not
have easy access to seminary libraries unless they live close to the seminary, pastors will make
little to no use of any library or library provided resources in their sermon preparation. This is
not simply a case of lack of awareness about resources being available. Most pastors are aware
or believe without knowing that their seminary library offers services to them, such as borrowing
by mail or ILL, or access to databases. But all five clergy indicated no interest in using academic
resources for sermon preparation, as all but one indicated no desire to use the sermon form to
teach.
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 23
References
Bandy, M., Doyle, J. D., Fladger, A., Frumento, K. S., Girouard, L., Hayes, S., & Rourke, D.
(2008). Standards for hospital libraries 2007. Journal of the Medical Library Association,
96(2), 162169. doi:10.3163/1536-5050.96.2.162
Bystrm, K., & Hansen, P. (2005). Conceptual framework for tasks in information studies.
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(10), 1050
1061. doi:10.1002/asi.20197
Case, D. O. (2007). Looking for information: a survey of research on information seeking, needs,
and behavior (2nd ed.). Amsterdam: Academic Press, Inc.
Curran, C. C., & Burns, K. (2011). A methodology for studying the information seeking
behavior of Catholic clergy. Advances in the Study of Information and Religion, 2011,
92108.
Ellis, D., & Oldman, H. (2005). The English literature researcher in the age of the Internet.
Journal of Information Science, 31(1), 2936. doi:10.1177/0165551505049256
Ge, X. (2010). Information-seeking behavior in the digital age: a multidisciplinary study of
academic researchers. College & Research Libraries, 71(5), 435455.
Gorman, G. E. (1990). Patterns of information seeking and library use by theologians in seven
Adelaide theological colleges. Australian Academic and Research Libraries, 21(3), 137
156.
Kuhlthau, C. C. (1994). Students and the information search process: Zones of intervention for
librarians. Advances in Librarianship, 18, 5772.
Lancour, H. (1944). The reading interests and habits of the graduates of the Union Theological
Seminary. The Library Quarterly, 14(1), 2835. doi:10.2307/4303174
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 24
Leckie, G. J., Pettigrew, K. E., & Sylvain, C. (1996). Modeling the information seeking of
professionals: a general model derived from research on engineers, health care
professionals, and lawyers. The Library Quarterly, 161193.
Michels, D. (2005). The use of people as information sources in Biblical studies research. The
Canadian Journal of Information and Library Science, 29(1), 91109.
Michels, D. (2009). Dipping into a shallow pool or beginning a deeper conversation: a case study
of a ministers engagement with the internet for preaching. Journal of Religious &
Theological Information, 8(3-4), 164178. doi:10.1080/10477845.2009.489814
Michels, D. (2011). Beyond belief: prayer as communication in religious information seeking
(SSRN Scholarly Paper No. ID 2133494). Rochester, NY: Social Science Research
Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2133494
Michels, D. (2012). Seeking gods will: the experience of information seeking by leaders of a
church in transition. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2134193
Penner, K. (2009). Information behaviour of theologians: a literature review. Theological
Librarianship, 2(1), 6782.
Roland, D. R. (2008). Clergy sense-making behavior and the sermon preparation task. The 2008
Proceedings of the ASSR-SW, 2330.
Roland, D. R. (2012). The information behavior of clergy members engaged in the sermon
preparation task: Wicks revisited. Journal of Religious & Theological Information, 11(1-
2), 115. doi:10.1080/10477845.2012.673112
Taylor, R. S. (1991). Information use environments. Progress in Communication Sciences,
10(217), 55.
Wiberley, S. E., & Jones, W. G. (2000). Time and technology: a decade-long look at humanists
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 25
use of electronic information technology. College & Research Libraries, 61(5), 421431.
Wicks, D. A. (1999). The information-seeking behavior of pastoral clergy: a study of the
interaction of their work worlds and work roles. Library & Information Science
Research, 21(2), 205226. doi:10.1016/S0740-8188(99)00003-1
Wilson, T. D. (2010). Fifty years of information behavior research. Bulletin of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 36(3), 2734.
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 26
Appendix A
The Role of the Internet in the Sermon Preparation Task Consent Form
This study involves a semi-structured, anonymous interview designed to understand the information behavior of clergy while preparing a sermon. Martin Patrick, a student in the Master of Library and Information Science program at Kent State University, is conducting the study along with Dr. Don Wicks, professor and director of the Center for the Study of Information and Religion at Kent State University. The Kent State University Institutional Review Board has approved this study. No deception is involved, and we do not believe the study involves more than minimal risk to participants (i.e., the level of risk encountered in daily life).
Participation in the study typically takes 30-60 minutes and is strictly anonymous. Participants and Co-PI Martin Patrick will engage in an interview in a setting of the participants choosing. These questions are both closed and open, and no question is absolutely required to be answered. No question is designed to reveal or explore any secret information. The Co-PI will take handwritten notes during the interview but your name or other information will appear on the notes. The notes will simply record the participant number, which will be in the form of C1-C5.
All responses are treated as confidential, and in no case will responses from individual participants be identified. Responses will be transcribed, coded, and analyzed by the Co-PI on his personal, password protected computer. Data will be published in aggregate for the most part, but when necessary, by using the markers C1, C2, C3, C4, or C5 to refer to an individuals response.
Participation is voluntary; refusal to take part in the study involves no penalty or loss of benefits to which participants are otherwise entitled, and participants may withdraw from or end the interview at any time without penalty or loss of benefits to which they are otherwise entitled.
If participants have further questions about this study or their rights, or if they wish to lodge a complaint or concern, they may contact the principal investigators, Martin Patrick, at (216)-533-8938 or [email protected] or Professor Donald Wicks, at 330-672-0011 or [email protected]; or the Kent State University Institutional Review Board, at (330) 672-2704.
If you are 18 years of age or older, understand the statements above, and freely consent to participate in the study, please sign below:
______________________________________________________________________________
Signature of participant Date signed
ROLE OF THE INTERNET IN SERMON PREPARATION 27
Appendix B
Interview Guidelines
1. Greetings, introductions, and overview of the project. Define information resources in the context the sermon preparation task.
2. Have participant sign consent form and secure the consent form in folder. 3. Get background information: degrees, years in ministry, previous career(s), and
denominational affiliation.
4. Can you describe your general process for preparing a sermon? 5. What are the various information resources that you used to complete your most recent
sermons, say over the past month? 6. What would you say is your primary source from which you gather information for
sermon preparation? a. Ask for more details about these resources.
7. How do you go about deciding if a particular resource is appropriate for your sermons, besides whether or not it claims to be about your sermon topic?
a. How much attention do you pay to the tradition of the publisher or author/creator of a resource in determining appropriateness?
b. What other criteria can you think that you use to judge the appropriateness of a resource?
8. How regularly would you say you use the web to gather information for your sermons? a. What are the tools you frequently use on the web? b. When did you start using the web to help you prepare sermons?
i. Would you say that the web has changed how you prepare sermons, if you began preaching before the web? How has it changed?
c. On a scale of 1-5, how important would you rate the web, compared to other resources as a tool for gathering information for sermons?
9. Do you use Internet-based tools like email and social networking sites to help prepare sermons?
a. What tools like these do you use for sermon preparation? b. How do these tools help you in this task?
10. Are you aware of your privileges for borrowing books or using databases and other tools that your seminary library offers you?
a. If so, what does this library offer to you? b. Do you ever use any of these tools for sermon preparation? c. Have you ever used resources provided by a public library to gather information
for sermon preparation? 11. Do you ever use online databases or electronic journals to find and use information?
a. Even if not, can you name any such databases or electronic journals that might be relevant?
b. Do you use any print journals as information resources? c. What percentage of information you review for sermon preparation would say
comes from electronic resources and from print resources?