The Road to Academic Success

Presentation to the Board of Education

November 14, 2018

Ms. Norma E. Martinez, Superintendent

Dr. Omaira Lee, San Marino School

Dr. Tia Belt-Brown, Centralia School

Mr. Erasmo Garcia, Danbrook School

Supporting the Needs of Students in Title I Schools

Orange County Comparison - Standards Met/Exceeded

ELA

Centralia AnaheimElementary Buena Park Cypress La Habra Magnolia Savanna Orange

County California

2015 52% 24% 35% 68% 29% 42% 43% 53% 44%

2016 63% 26% 41% 68% 34% 49% 48% 57% 49%

2017 61% 26% 41% 66% 35% 49% 45% 57% 49%

2018 63.95% 30.23% 43.64% 68.67% 36.18% 52.55% 48.16% 58.37% 49%

MAT

H

Centralia AnaheimElementary Buena Park Cypress La Habra Magnolia Savanna Orange

County California

2015 46% 21% 31% 56% 19% 40% 35% 45% 33%

2016 53% 21% 37% 61% 25% 42% 40% 48% 37%

2017 54% 22% 37% 63% 27% 43% 42% 48% 38%

2018 58.54% 24.78% 37.18% 66.32% 27.47% 46.24% 42.82% 49.34% 38%

Centralia School District - Standards Met/Exceeded

ELA

BT CN DN DY LC ML SM RT DO

2015 69% 33% 37% 51% 79% 59% 49% 40% 52%

2016 76% 49% 48% 62% 79% 63% 58% 61% 63%

2017 68% 45% 47% 65% 87% 68% 59% 54% 61%

2018 66.77% 48.59% 48.07% 68.72% 89.64% 77.28% 57.59% 56.60% 63.95%

MAT

H

BT CN DN DY LC ML SM RT DO

2015 51% 31% 40% 41% 77% 48% 41% 37% 46%

2016 62% 39% 39% 47% 83% 59% 51% 43% 53%

2017 64% 40% 45% 50% 85% 61% 46% 46% 54%

2018 65.24% 41.12% 47.36% 58.30% 86.08% 70.60% 49.53% 51.32% 58.54%

• Schools that have the highest percentage of poverty levels within a district will qualify as a Title I school

• Title I provides supplemental instructional services & activities to students in meeting the state standards in mathematics, reading, and writing

• In its report, The Condition of Education(2016) the National Center for Education Statistics attributed living in poverty during early childhood, in part, to lower levels of academic performance “beginning in kindergarten and extending through elementary and high school.”

Presenter

Presentation Notes

Complex

Plan

Do

Evaluate

Continual Improvement Model

Data Analysis• School-wide, Subgroup &

Grade Level Analysis

SPSA Planning• Budget Allocation • Goal Setting• Training• Parent Engagement• School Climate Needs • Board Approval

Strengthen Daily Instructional Strategies • ELA, Math, EL Focus

Implement Extended School Interventions & Programs to Support Learning

ELA• Oral Reading Records K-

2• AR (IRL) 2nd – 6th• District Benchmark 3rd-

6th• High Frequency Words

K-3• Writing – Narrative

(Pre/Post)• Interim Assessment

Math• ST Math K- 6th• District Benchmark• IAB's

SAN MARINO ELEMENTARY

Dr. Omaira LeePrincipal

SAN MARINO ELA SBAC Claim Analysis: 3rd – 6th

20%

36%

17%

29% 30% 32%

17%

25%31%

40%

20%

29%

22%

33%

23%

42%

26%

35%

19%

32%

48%

32%

64%

44%46%

42%

64%

54%

38%

34%

53%

44%

63%

51%

64%

43%50%

40%

58%

46%

32%32%

20%

27%24% 26%

20% 21%

32%

26% 27% 27%

15% 17%13%

16%

25% 24% 23% 22%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

R W L RI R W L RI R W L RI R W L RI R W L RI

2017-2018 SBAC (3rd) 2017-2018 SBAC (4th) 2017-2018 SBAC (5th) 2017-2018 SBAC (6th) 2017-2018 SBAC

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 All

English Language Arts

Above Standard At or Near Standard Below Standard

57.59%

San Marino Instructional Practices English Language Arts

• Expansion/Implementation of AVID• Strengthening Universal Access for K-2 and Tier I instruction

including small group instruction• Establishing a Professional Learning Communities Protocol/Progress

Monitoring with Formative/Summative Assessments1. Increased Data Cycles2. Increased Collaboration

• Continued Professional Development in AVID• Blended Learning Opportunities

48%

36%33%

22% 20% 21% 21%15%

12%

34%

20%

28% 30%

22% 23%

27%

39% 43% 43%48% 49%

34%

47%51%

33%

57%

44%

34%

49% 47%

25% 25%

4%

36%32% 30%

45%

38% 38%34%

23%29%

35%

29% 30%

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

CP PS CR CP PS CR CP PS CR CP PS CR CP PS CR

2017-2018 SBAC (3rd) 2017-2018 SBAC (4th) 2017-2018 SBAC (5th) 2017-2018 SBAC (6th) 2017-2018 SBAC

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6 All

Mathematics

Above Standard At or Near Standard Below Standard

SAN MARINO MATH SBAC Claim Analysis: 3rd – 6th 49.53%

San Marino Instructional Practices Math

• Expansion/Implementation of AVID• Strengthening Universal Access for K-2 and Tier I

instruction including small group instruction• Establishing a Professional Learning Communities Protocol/Progress

Monitoring with Formative/Summative Assessments1. Increased Data Cycles2. Increased Collaboration

• Continued Professional Development in AVID• Blended Learning Opportunities

San Marino Subgroup 2018 Results

Language Fluency Ethnicity

English Only EL IFEP RFEP Black/African American Asian Filipino Hispanic/

Latino White Two or More Races

ELA

StandardExceeded 32.27% 7.59% 80% 53.46% 16.9% 67.07% 57.78% 21.39% 39.07% 38.16%

StandardMet 28.78% 22.96% 14.29% 35.51% 33.8% 21.39% 24.89% 30.97% 30.46% 28.95%

Standard Nearly Met 17.27% 28.99% 5.71% 9.91% 18.31% 7.69% 10.22% 22.98% 16.92% 17.11%

Standard Not Met 16.68% 40.47% 0% 0% 30.99% 3.85% 7.11% 24.66% 13.54% 15.79%

MAT

H

StandardExceeded 33.09% 7.84% 68.57% 50.09% 12.68% 65.71% 51.75% 17.72% 35.28% 39.47%

StandardMet 27.25% 22.37% 22.86% 28.97% 25.35% 21.43% 26.32% 27.91% 26.99% 34.21%

Standard Nearly Met 21.86% 31.55% 8.57% 18.32% 32.39% 8.57% 17.11% 29.13% 21.17% 10.53%

Standard Not Met 17.8% 38.24% 0% 2.62% 29.58% 4.29% 4.82% 25.25% 16.56% 15.79%

San Marino Instructional Practices English Learners

•Designated ELD time/ Establish Daily Schedule•Use of ELD Standards•Use of Sentence Frames•SDAIE strategies including interactive journals focusing on vocabulary•Partner with parents to increase parent involvement

EL's RFEP's

K 7

1st 14

2nd 20 7

3rd 22 13

4th 22 11

5th 12 17

6th 15 24

SDC 6

Tia Belt Brown, Ed.D.Principal

Centralia Instructional PracticesContinuous Improvement Cycle

• An area of concern was in the reading indicator where our students were 38.56% below standard.

“How well do students understand stories and information that they read?”

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 62015 31 27 31 412016 48 58 45 502017 39 47 50 42.852018 47.73 50.69 48.23 48.59

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Centralia English Language Arts

2015 2016 2017 2018

Centralia Instructional PracticesEnglish Language Arts

• Expansion/Implementation of GLAD strategies• Progress Monitoring (formative/summative

assessments)• Increase grade level articulation/collaboration• Analyze data, create SMART goals• Individual goal setting with students

• Family Literacy Workshops

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 62015 49 29 19 282016 63 44 18 312017 51.28 54.12 37.21 19.782018 54.43 38.36 40 32.15

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Centralia - Mathematics

2015 2016 2017 2018

An area of concern was in the mathematical indicators where our students were 37.07% below standard.

“How well do students show and apply their problem solving skills”

Centralia Instructional PracticesContinuous Improvement Cycle

Centralia's Instructional PracticesMathematics

• Expansion/Implementation of GLAD strategiesand Cognitively Guided Instruction (CGI)

• Family Math Events• Math Festivals• Family STEAM Nights• ST Math Celebrations (JiJi)

• Progress Monitoring (formative/summative assessments)• Increase grade level articulation/collaboration

Centralia Instructional PracticesEnglish Learners - ELA

• English Learners are performing in the below standard reading indicator at 68.75%

“How well do students understand stories and information that they read?”

Centralia Instructional PracticesEnglish Learners - Math

• English Learners are performing below standard at 75.76%

“Concepts & Procedures – How well do students use mathematical rules and ideas?”

Centralia's Instructional PracticesEnglish Learner – ELA & Math

• Designated ELD time• Expansion/Implementation of GLAD strategies• Family Literacy Workshops• Extended Day Homework Assistance

Erasmo GarciaPrincipal

Danbrook Instructional Practices

Danbrook Instructional PracticesEnglish Language Arts

• Leveled/Flexible Small Group Instruction for K-6th gradeLearning Center services over 150 students a day

• Universal Access – Leveled Across Grade Span • Progress Monitoring (formative/summative assessments)

• Increase grade level articulation/collaboration• Analyze Data, Set Smart Goals

• Reading Olympics • Family Literary and Academic Support Workshops• Extended Learning Time

Danbrook's Instructional PracticesEnglish Language Development

• Long Term English Learner (LTEL) Academy • Designated ELD time• Functional text and academic vocabulary

• Expansion/Implementation of GLAD strategies• Family Literacy Workshops• Extended Learning Time

Danbrook's Instructional PracticesMathematics• Leveled Instruction for K-6th grade

• Cognitively Guided Instruction • Mathematical principles incorporated into Project Based

Learning (PBL)• Increase grade level articulation/collaboration• Analyze Data, Set Smart Goals

• Jiji Class Competition• Extended Learning Time • Progress Monitoring (formative/summative

assessments)

Board of Education’s Commitment to Student Achievement

Transparency in Data and

Expectation

The District will offer an ALL-Day

Kindergarten experience

Each school will reach 60% Met/Exceeded in ELA & Math

All Students Will Learn

Title I - $800KLCAP

Set the Vision

Establish Goals

Develop Policy

Allocate Resources

Assuring Accountability

Presenter

Presentation Notes

San Marino, Centralia, and Danbrook are committed to increase growth in their schools and are going in with ALL hands on deck!