Upload
trinhxuyen
View
215
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Restoration Opportunities Assessment Methodology (ROAM)
KUZEE, MirjamInternational Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN)Forest Landscape Restoration Assessments Coordinator
The Bonn Challenge is an important implementation vehicle for existing global commitments, including:
Through Forest Landscape Restoration (FLR)……
• Forests, because it involves increasing the number and/ or health of trees in an area with the objective to restore the area.
• Landscapes, because it involves entire watersheds, jurisdictions, biomes in which many land uses interact, often a mosaic of interdependent land uses.
• Restoration, because it involves bringing back the biological productivity of an area in order to achieve any number of benefits for people and the planet.
• It is a long-term process over large areas, but can produce short-term benefits.
…. the principles of Forest Landscape Restoration
Focus on landscapes
Restore functionality (forward-looking restoration)
Allow for multiple benefits
Leverage a suite of strategies
Involve stakeholders
Tailor to local conditions
Avoid further reduction of natural forest cover
Adaptively manage
Source: IUCN ROAM Guide
Degraded primary forest
Secondary forest
Permanent pasture
Intensive agriculture
Riverine
Degraded
…. the principles of Forest Landscape Restoration
Focus on landscapes
Restore functionality (forward-looking restoration)
Allow for multiple benefits
Leverage a suite of strategies
Involve stakeholders
Tailor to local conditions
Avoid further reduction of natural forest cover
Adaptively manage
BUT WHERE DO WE START?
One option is to use ROAM
ROAM is a methodology to identify and prioritize FLR opportunities at the national and subnational level – and much more....
Key aspects of ROAM
Stepwise, iterative, flexible and adaptable to national and subnational context
Brings people together to identify, negotiate, and implement FLR activities, that restore an agreed optimal balance of the ecological, social, and economic benefits of forests and trees, within a broader pattern of land uses
ROAM helps us to answers questions such as:
1. Where is restoration socially, economically and ecologically feasible?
2. What is the total extent of restoration opportunities in the country/region?
3. Which types of restoration are feasible in different parts of the country/region?
4. What are the costs and benefits, including carbon storage and ecosystem services, associated with different restoration strategies?
5. What policy, financial and social incentives exist or are needed to support restoration?
6. Who are the stakeholders with whom we need to engage?
7. What options exist to unlock finance for restoration?
8. How can we scale up restoration?
Based on best knowledge and best science.
• 17 countries committed 63.3 mhato Bonn Challenge
• 11 are carrying out ROAM to prioritize actions and investment for landscape restoration
• Country driven process – IUCN, GIZ, WRI, FAO, WB give support
• Capacity building via on-the-job training, learning, online course
FLR & ROAM in Africa
Evolution of Methodology
SCALE:
National (Rwanda, Costa Rica)State (Chiapas, Espirito Santo)Regional (Yucatan follows state jurisdiction, Burundi, Myanmar)District (Mozambique, Rwanda)Community level (Burundi)Watershed (Cambodia)
Objectives:
Food security (Malawi, Burundi)Livelihoods (Rwanda)Sustainable production (ORMACC)Carbon (FIP) (Mozambique, ORMACC)Nature reserves (Burundi, Cambodia, Mozambique)Biodiversity (Myanmar, Malawi)Resilience (Malawi, Uganda)Watershed (Cambodia)
26 Countries total – 36? ROAM processes
Key components of ROAM
Scoping FLR (drivers of degradation, objectives): inception WS
Stocktaking (what worked, what did not)
Stakeholder mapping
Data collection and mapping (best science, best knowledge)
Spatial data analysis and economic analysis
FLR opportunities and transitions identified
Validate results with stakeholders: validation WS
Develop FLR action plan and finance strategy
Understanding degradation and drivers of degradation. Agreeing on the objectives for FLR, for example:
• Erosion control, sedimentation of rivers
• Resilience
• Food & water security
• Increase soil productivity
• etc
Defining the problem and restoration objectives
Habitat fragmentation + population density
Loss ecosystem productivity
Reduced carbon
sequestration
FLR Priority map M
ULT
I-C
RIT
ERIA
DEG
RA
DAT
ION
MA
PP
ING
Land use type AreaVerylow Low Medium High
Veryhigh
Intensive agriculture 68,551 1,545 5,729 21,630 15,178 22,732
Shifting agriculture 175,144 541 21,724 73,167 28,545 49,440
Silvopastoral 844,655 1,924 29,666 220,260 272,946 316,227
Mangroves 93,314 79,735 9,526 3,365 44 3
Plantations 310 29 26 82 85 52
High and medium altitude rainforest 86,754 10,228 65,132 8,277 2,900 214
Tropical dry forest 731,618 101,319 330,712 145,072 123,984 22,242
Lowland rainforest 26,484 1,888 16,542 3,069 2,167 2,808
Deciduous tropical forest 1,716,485 305,394 746,348 446,549 184,981 31,999
Wetlands 43,165 37,789 4,716 548 23 3
Total general 3,916,771 548,633 1,237,034 925,328 632,195 446,338
Land Degradation per Land Use (ha)
Agriculture Agroforestry
Poorly managed
woodlots
Well
managed
woodlots
Deforested land Naturally
regenerated
forests
technical interventions
Jan. 2006 Aug. 2006Silvopastoralsystems
Ref.: Zoraida Calle,2012
5.1 heads/ha; 4.1 L Milk/day/cow1.2 heads/ha; 1.7 L milk/day/cow
Sanchún, A. (2016) UICN.
technical interventions
Uso actual
Área de
oportunidad
(ha)
Porcentaje Técnicas de restauración acordadas
Sabanas de pastos
naturales638.741 28%
Recuperación de cultivos perennes
tradicionales (marañón, cítricos, nancite,
Acacia magnum, Roble; coco, palma
(zona costera))
Tacotales 461.040 20% Regeneración natural e inducida
Vegetación
herbácea/arbustiva367.503 16% Regeneración natural e inducida
Bosque latifoliado en
regeneración65.570 3% Regeneración natural e inducida
Cultivos/pastos 94.627 4%
Sistemas silvopastoriles con árboles
forrajeros
Cambios tecnológicos y técnicas de
manejo
Cultivos anuales 15.329 1%Agricultura con buenas prácticas
Sistemas agroforestales
Important to consider, in the planning of restoration strategies, the respective benefits of
different restoration techniques in terms of supporting progress for Aichi targets
… restoration of 15% of degraded habitats... ?
Current land – use CO2
Restored land – use CO2
Potential impact FLR:> GDP 2% Campeche – 6% Yucatan, combined impact of increasing productivity and carbon storage (at a price of 4 USD/tCO2).
Contribution to NDCs
INITIAL INVESTMENT(USD/ha)
TOTAL COSTSat present value(USD/ha)
BENEFIT-COST RATIO
NET PRESENT VALUE (USD/ha/yr)
IRR (%) AVG. CARBON MITIGATIONt CO2e/ha/yr
Conservation agriculture(corn-soy-cedar) $ 2,468 $ 13,674 1.2 $ 126 65.2 35.71
Improved milpa system(corn-beans-pumpkin-cedar) $ 501 $ 10,319 5.8 $1,083 103.0 104.8
Commercial forest plantations(teak-corn-sheeps) $ 1,460 $ 15,354 3.0 $1,571 18.7 87.56
Silvopastoral system(cattle-leucaena) $ 12,993 $ 17,721 1.3 $190 43.0 33.95
Agropastoral system(sheeps-orange-apiculture) $ 4,534 $ 19,915 1.7 $594 16.9 11.81
Agroforestry rainfed (mango-banana-pumpkin-mahogany) $ 753 $ 17,572 1.9 $615 393.0 38.49
Agroforestry irrigated(cocoa-lemon-papaya-corn-beans-watermelon-teak-melina)
$ 3,658 $ 22,575 1.6 $674 34.8 28.14
Secondary forest enrichment (apiculture-pepper-achiote) $ 3,532 $ 34,573 1.3 $456 26.8 91.35
Access to ROAM materials
Download our road-test handbook on ROAM: www.iucn.org/ROAM
Use the clickable version of ROAM to navigate the phases online: http://www.forestlandscaperestoration.org/
See the animations of each phase as quick visual introductions: www.iucn.org/ROAM
Available in English, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian, Bahasa Indonesia.
Contact us at: [email protected] to share your experiences with us
INTERACTIVE SESSION - USBs