1
The QCD phase diagram from functional methods Lisa M. Haas 1,2 , Jens Braun 3 and Jan M. Pawlowski 1,2 1 Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Heidelberg, Philosophenweg 16, 69120 Heidelberg 2 ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI, GSI, Planckstr. 1, 64291 Darmstadt 3 Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Theoretisch-Physikalisches Institut, Max-Wien Platz 1, 07743 Jena Introduction Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) at non-zero temperature and density is a very active area of research. One interesting question is the relation between the chiral (χ) phase transition from microscopic degrees of freedom, quarks and gluons, to macroscopic bound states, hadrons and the confinement-deconfinement phase transition from the quark- gluon plasma at high temperature and density to the hadronic phase at low temperature and density. An understanding of this interrelation in terms of microscopic dofs is complicated by the fact that one needs to bridge the gap between a deconfined chirally symmetric regime and a confined regime with broken chiral symmetry. Fig. 1: The phase diagram of QCD. (credits: GSI Darmstadt) QCD with functional methods We compute the QCD effective action with functional RG tech- niques, which allows us to include all quantum fluctuations step- wise at each momentum scale k. This is achieved by integra- tions over small momentum shells, generating a flow from the microscopic action S bare in the UV towards the macroscopic ac- tion Γ in the IR. G [f] S [f] G k k=L k [f] k 0 IR UV k- k d Fig. 2: Momentum modes above k are integrated out, modes below are suppressed due to the regulator. In our dynamical two-flavour calculation [1] in the chiral limit we include the glue sector of QCD and the matter sector [2] and couple them via dynamic quark gluon interactions. The confin- ing properties are included via the full momentum dependence of the ghost and gluon propagators [3, 4], the matter sector in- corporates dynamical mesonic degrees of freedom [2, 5, 6]. t Γ k [φ]= 1 2 - - + 1 2 Fig. 3: Diagrammatic representation of the flow of the effective ac- tion. The cross denotes the regulator function which ensures stepwise integration over small momentum shells. Imaginary chemical potential Roberge-Weiss phase transition At imaginary chemical potential μ =2πTiθ the effective action of QCD is periodic: QCD θ = QCD θ+θz , where θ z =0, 1/3, 2/3 for SU (3), as θ θ + θ z is canceled by the center transfor- mations of the fields. Quantities related to the effective action show the same periodicity (Roberge-Weiss (RW) periodicity), e. g. the chiral condensate ¯ ψψ. QCD θ is smooth until θ =1/6 but then shows a discontinuity: the Polyakov loop RW phase transition at T RW . RW transition RW Endpoint chiral transition 2 (chemical potential) 0 QGP Hadrons T RW T Fig. 4: QCD phase diagram including imaginary chemical potential. Results at vanishing μ At vanishing chemical potential we compute the Polyakov loop L = 1 Nc Tr P e i β 0 dt A0 , the dual density and the pion decay con- stant and we find close critial temperatures for the deconfine- ment T deconf and the chiral T χ transition. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230 T [MeV] f π (T)/f π (0) Dual density Polyakov Loop 160 180 200 χ L,dual Fig. 5: The pion decay constant, the dual density and the Polyakov loop as functions of temperature, χ L = T L[A 0 ], χ dual = T ˜ n. In [7] so-called dual order parameters have been defined. For dy- namical quarks simple functional relations (DSE/FRG) require the extension of the formalism in [7] to imaginary chemical po- tential, this has been done in [1]. An example of these dual order parameters is the dual density n θ ¯ ψγ 0 ψθ . Here, we also compare the critical temperatures for the deconfinement transi- tion given by the Polyakov loop and the dual density. χ L and χ dual show a peak at the same temperature, which provides a consistency check for our calculation. Results at imaginary μ The chiral phase transition Here we plot the pion decay constant as a function of tempera- ture and imaginary chemical potential. The pion decay constant shows the RW periodicity in θ, it is non-zero below T χ and van- ishes above. 2 f π θ T [MeV] Fig. 6: The pion decay constant as a function of temperature and imaginary chemical potential. The chiral and deconfinement transition 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 0 π/3 2π/3 π 4π/3 T [MeV] 2πθ T conf T χ Fig. 7: T χ and T deconf as functions of temperature and imaginary chemical potential. The shaded area indicates the width of χ L . Our results for the phase diagram at imaginary chemical poten- tial show that the chiral and the deconfinement transition agree within the width of χ L for all θ. We find the predicted RW sym- metry. Our result compares qulitatively well with lattice QCD calculations [8]. The parameters of the PNJL model calcula- tions can be adjusted such that their result agrees with lattice calculations [9]. In our calculation the coinciding critical tem- peratures are solely due to the interplay of quantum fluctuations and are not adjusted by hand. Polyakov loop potential The YM Polyakov loop potential shows a phase transition at T c = 276 MeV [3], the QCD glue potential at T c = 203 MeV [10]. -0.5 -0.4 -0.3 -0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 β 4 V(β <Α 0 >) β <A 0 >/(2π) 0.3 0.5 0.7 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 T=203 MeV T=195 MeV T=200 MeV T=210 MeV T=215 MeV T=220 MeV T=225 MeV β 4 V [A 0 ] SU(3) βgA0 2π Fig. 8: SU (3) YM potential (left panel) [3] and SU (3) QCD glue potential (right panel) [10] for various temperatures. Fig. 9: Comparison of PQM input and FRG QCD output. The FRG provides QCD glue results as input for PQM calculations. Φ= Lis the expectation value of the Polyakov loop. PQM calculations use a fit to YM thermodynamics for the Polyakov loop potential. The YM and the QCD glue poten- tial have a similar form but differ in temperature scale. 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 t= -0.05 YM t= 0 YM t= 0.05 YM t= -0.05 glue t= 0 glue t= 0.05 glue β 4 V [A 0 ] SU (3) βgA 0 2π Fig. 10: Comparison of the YM and the QCD glue potential for various reduced temperatures t = T -Tc Tc . The Polyakov loop potentials can therefore be approximately related by (β 4 V ) QCD [t,A 0 ] (β 4 V ) YM [t YM (t),A 0 ], which can be used in PQM studies to model QCD glue dynamics. Especially the (reduced) YM temperature is given as a function of the QCD glue temperature t YM (t). Outlook Extend to N f = 2+1 real chemical potential, include better res- olution of finite temperature propagators (see talk of L. Fister) and resolve RW endpoint at imaginary chemical potential. References [1] J. Braun, L. M. Haas, F. Marhauser, J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 2011. [2] J. Braun, Eur. Phys. J. C 64, 2009. [3] J. Braun, H. Gies, J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Lett. B 684, 2010. [4] C. S. Fischer, A. Maas, J. M. Pawlowski, Annals Phys. 324, 2009; J. M. Pawlowski, in preparation. [5] H. Gies, C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. D 69, 2004; J. Braun, H. Gies, JHEP 0606, 2006. [6] J. Berges, N. Tetradis, C. Wetterich, Phys. Rept. 363, 2002; B. J. Schäfer, J. Wambach, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 2005. [7] C. Gattringer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 2006; F. Synatschke, A. Wipf, C. Wozar, Phys. Rev. D 75, 2007; E. Bilgici, F. Bruckmann, C. Gattringer, C. Hagen, Phys. Rev. D 77, 2008; E. Bilgici et al., Few Body Syst. 47, 2010; C. S. Fischer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 2009. [8] S. Kratochvila, P. de Forcrand, Phys. Rev. D 73, 2006; L. K. Wu, X.-Q. Luo, H.-S. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 76, 2007. [9] Y. Sakai, K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno, M. Yahiro, Phys. Rev. D 77, 2008. [10] J. Braun, L. M. Haas, J. M. Pawlwoski, in preparation.

The QCD phase diagram from functional methodscrunch.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de/qghxm/2011/Poster/Haas.pdf · The QCD phase diagram from functional methods Lisa M. Haas1,2, Jens Braun3

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    7

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The QCD phase diagram from functional methodscrunch.ikp.physik.tu-darmstadt.de/qghxm/2011/Poster/Haas.pdf · The QCD phase diagram from functional methods Lisa M. Haas1,2, Jens Braun3

The QCD phase diagram from functional methods

Lisa M. Haas1,2, Jens Braun3 and Jan M. Pawlowski1,2

1Institut für Theoretische Physik, Universität Heidelberg, Philosophenweg 16, 69120 Heidelberg2ExtreMe Matter Institute EMMI, GSI, Planckstr. 1, 64291 Darmstadt

3Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Theoretisch-Physikalisches Institut, Max-Wien Platz 1, 07743 Jena

Introduction

Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD) at non-zero temperatureand density is a very active area of research.One interesting question is the relation between the chiral (χ)phase transition from microscopic degrees of freedom, quarksand gluons, to macroscopic bound states, hadrons and theconfinement-deconfinement phase transition from the quark-gluon plasma at high temperature and density to the hadronicphase at low temperature and density.An understanding of this interrelation in terms of microscopicdofs is complicated by the fact that one needs to bridge the gapbetween a deconfined chirally symmetric regime and a confinedregime with broken chiral symmetry.

Fig. 1: The phase diagram of QCD. (credits: GSI Darmstadt)

QCD with functional methods

We compute the QCD effective action with functional RG tech-niques, which allows us to include all quantum fluctuations step-wise at each momentum scale k. This is achieved by integra-tions over small momentum shells, generating a flow from themicroscopic action Sbare in the UV towards the macroscopic ac-tion Γ in the IR.

G [f] S[f] Gk

k=L

k

[f]

k 0

IR UV

k- kd

Fig. 2: Momentum modes above k are integrated out, modes below

are suppressed due to the regulator.

In our dynamical two-flavour calculation [1] in the chiral limitwe include the glue sector of QCD and the matter sector [2] andcouple them via dynamic quark gluon interactions. The confin-ing properties are included via the full momentum dependenceof the ghost and gluon propagators [3, 4], the matter sector in-corporates dynamical mesonic degrees of freedom [2, 5, 6].

∂tΓk[φ] = 1

2− − + 1

2

Fig. 3: Diagrammatic representation of the flow of the effective ac-

tion. The cross denotes the regulator function which ensures stepwise

integration over small momentum shells.

Imaginary chemical potential

Roberge-Weiss phase transition

At imaginary chemical potential µ = 2πT iθ the effective actionof QCD is periodic: QCDθ = QCDθ+θz

, where θz = 0, 1/3, 2/3for SU(3), as θ → θ + θz is canceled by the center transfor-mations of the fields. Quantities related to the effective actionshow the same periodicity (Roberge-Weiss (RW) periodicity),e. g. the chiral condensate 〈ψψ〉. QCDθ is smooth until θ = 1/6but then shows a discontinuity: the Polyakov loop RW phasetransition at TRW.

RW transition

RW Endpoint

chiral transition

2(chemical potential)0

QGP

Hadrons

TRW

T

Fig. 4: QCD phase diagram including imaginary chemical potential.

Results at vanishing µ

At vanishing chemical potential we compute the Polyakov loop

L = 1

NcTrPei

∫ β

0dt A0, the dual density and the pion decay con-

stant and we find close critial temperatures for the deconfine-ment Tdeconf and the chiral Tχ transition.

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

150 160 170 180 190 200 210 220 230

T [MeV]

fπ(T)/fπ(0)

Dual density

Polyakov Loop

160 180 200

χL

,du

al

Fig. 5: The pion decay constant, the dual density and the Polyakov

loop as functions of temperature, χL= ∂TL[〈A0〉], χdual

= ∂Tn.

In [7] so-called dual order parameters have been defined. For dy-namical quarks simple functional relations (DSE/FRG) requirethe extension of the formalism in [7] to imaginary chemical po-tential, this has been done in [1]. An example of these dual orderparameters is the dual density nθ ∼

∫〈ψγ0ψ〉θ. Here, we also

compare the critical temperatures for the deconfinement transi-tion given by the Polyakov loop and the dual density. χL andχdual show a peak at the same temperature, which provides aconsistency check for our calculation.

Results at imaginary µ

The chiral phase transition

Here we plot the pion decay constant as a function of tempera-ture and imaginary chemical potential. The pion decay constantshows the RW periodicity in θ, it is non-zero below Tχ and van-ishes above.

2

θ

T [MeV]

Fig. 6: The pion decay constant as a function of temperature and

imaginary chemical potential.

The chiral and deconfinement transition

0

50

100

150

200

250

300

0 π/3 2π/3 π 4π/3

T [M

eV

]

2πθ

Tconf

Fig. 7: Tχ and Tdeconf as functions of temperature and imaginary

chemical potential. The shaded area indicates the width of χL.

Our results for the phase diagram at imaginary chemical poten-tial show that the chiral and the deconfinement transition agreewithin the width of χL for all θ. We find the predicted RW sym-metry. Our result compares qulitatively well with lattice QCDcalculations [8]. The parameters of the PNJL model calcula-tions can be adjusted such that their result agrees with latticecalculations [9]. In our calculation the coinciding critical tem-peratures are solely due to the interplay of quantum fluctuationsand are not adjusted by hand.

Polyakov loop potential

The YM Polyakov loop potential shows a phase transition atTc = 276 MeV [3], the QCD glue potential at Tc = 203 MeV [10].

-0.5

-0.4

-0.3

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

β4 V

(β <

Α0>

)

β <A0>/(2π)

0.3 0.5 0.7

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

T=203 MeV

T=195 MeV

T=200 MeV

T=210 MeV

T=215 MeV

T=220 MeV

T=225 MeV

β4V[A

0]

SU(3)

βgA0

Fig. 8: SU(3) YM potential (left panel) [3] and SU(3) QCD glue

potential (right panel) [10] for various temperatures.

Fig. 9: Comparison of PQM input and FRG QCD output. The FRG

provides QCD glue results as input for PQM calculations. Φ = 〈L〉

is the expectation value of the Polyakov loop.

PQM calculations use a fit to YM thermodynamics for thePolyakov loop potential. The YM and the QCD glue poten-tial have a similar form but differ in temperature scale.

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

t= -0.05 YMt= 0 YMt= 0.05 YMt= -0.05 glue

t= 0 glue

t= 0.05 glue

β4V[A

0]

SU(3)

βgA0

Fig. 10: Comparison of the YM and the QCD glue potential for

various reduced temperatures t = T−Tc

Tc.

The Polyakov loop potentials can therefore be approximatelyrelated by

(β4V )QCD[t, A0] ≃ (β4V )Y M [tY M(t), A0],

which can be used in PQM studies to model QCD glue dynamics.Especially the (reduced) YM temperature is given as a functionof the QCD glue temperature tY M(t).

Outlook

Extend to Nf = 2+1 real chemical potential, include better res-olution of finite temperature propagators (see talk of L. Fister)and resolve RW endpoint at imaginary chemical potential.

References

[1] J. Braun, L. M. Haas, F. Marhauser, J. M. Pawlowski,Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 2011.

[2] J. Braun, Eur. Phys. J. C 64, 2009.

[3] J. Braun, H. Gies, J. M. Pawlowski, Phys. Lett. B 684, 2010.

[4] C. S. Fischer, A. Maas, J. M. Pawlowski, Annals Phys. 324, 2009;J. M. Pawlowski, in preparation.

[5] H. Gies, C. Wetterich, Phys. Rev. D 69, 2004;J. Braun, H. Gies, JHEP 0606, 2006.

[6] J. Berges, N. Tetradis, C. Wetterich, Phys. Rept. 363, 2002;B. J. Schäfer, J. Wambach, Nucl. Phys. A 757, 2005.

[7] C. Gattringer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 2006;F. Synatschke, A. Wipf, C. Wozar, Phys. Rev. D 75, 2007;E. Bilgici, F. Bruckmann, C. Gattringer, C. Hagen, Phys. Rev. D77, 2008;E. Bilgici et al., Few Body Syst. 47, 2010;C. S. Fischer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 2009.

[8] S. Kratochvila, P. de Forcrand, Phys. Rev. D 73, 2006;L. K. Wu, X.-Q. Luo, H.-S. Chen, Phys. Rev. D 76, 2007.

[9] Y. Sakai, K. Kashiwa, H. Kouno, M. Yahiro, Phys. Rev. D 77,2008.

[10] J. Braun, L. M. Haas, J. M. Pawlwoski, in preparation.