Upload
beryl-walton
View
216
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Project HEART Experience: Assessment of an HIV Care and
Treatment Program Amanda D. Castel, MD, MPHAssistant Research Professor
Michelle Gill, MPHEGPAF/GWU Partnership Executive Coordinator
Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsThe George Washington University School of Public
Health and Health Services
EGPAF/GWU Partnership
April 30, 2009
Assessment Goals
Examine different models of service delivery for care and treatment scale up in 3 of 5 PH countries
Examine different approaches to providing technical and programmatic support for care and treatment (not PMTCT focused)
Identify best practices, challenges, solutions, and obtain recommendations from the field
Identify ways to further support and integrate care and treatment in PH countries
Assessment Team Members
GWU Faculty and Staff– Amanda D. Castel, MD, MPH (Overall Assessment Team
Leader)– Michelle Gill, MPH (Zambia, TZ)– Irene Kuo, PhD, MPH (Team Leader for Zambia trip)– Jennifer Skillicorn, MPH (Cote d’Ivoire)
External Consultants– George Beatty, MD, MPH (UCSF) (TZ, Cote d’Ivoire)– Judith Justice, PhD, MPH (UCSF)( TZ, Zambia, Cote d’Ivoire)– Maureen Shannon, CNM, FNP, PhD (Univ. of HI)(Zambia, TZ)
EGPAF Staff– Lindsay Bonanno (Tanzania)– Nicole Buono, MPH (Cote d’Ivoire)– Stephen Lee, MD (Zambia)– Ric Marlink, MD – Rose McCullough, PhD (Tanzania)
Focus Areas
Management Models of Service Delivery Quality of Care/Continuum of Care Community Linkages Policy Analysis and Influence Training/Mentoring/Supportive
Supervision and Capacity Building Quantitative Evaluation Systems
Assessment Methods
Developed quantitative and qualitative tools
Conducted document review and desk audit of relevant program information
Conducted site visits Conducted in-depth interviews Wrote country level reports and
global report
Country-Level Interviews
EGPAF U.S. and country staff Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Other PEPFAR funded Track 1.0 Partners MOH programs: e.g., National AIDS Control
Program, TB/HIV, M & E, District or Regional AIDS Coordinator
Supply chain and drug procurement organizations/agencies
NGOs, CBOs, FBOs Sub-grantees Staff at clinical sites, N=49 sites
Country Visits Teams:
– 5-6 members for each trip– EGPAF, GW faculty and staff and external
consultants Zambia- June 2008
– 18 sites visited– Range: 494 - 7,453 patients per month*
Cote d’Ivoire-July 2008– 16 sites visited– Range: 43 - 3,026 patients per month
Tanzania- September 2008– 15 sites visited– Range: 123 - 3,997 patients per month
*Data not available for 2 sites
Sites Visited, N=49Characteristic Number
Setting
Capital city 13
Other Urban 17
Peri- Urban 8
Rural 11
Site Type
Public 30
Private/FBO 19
Service Provided
C and T/PMTCT 33
Site Level
Primary 31
Secondary 10
Tertiary 5
Peripheral 3
Summary Findings by Focus Area
Management
Strong and responsive U.S. and country management teams
Opening of sub-offices in some countries
Addressing challenges related to financial and contract management
Need for regular communication between U.S. and country offices
Policy Analysis and Influence
EGPAF or sub-partner playing major role in development of key policies related to C & T
Provide substantial technical assistance and guidance on development of guidelines and regulations
Recognized as a leader in area of HIV C & T Working to influence task-shifting in
response to healthcare worker shortages Coordination with other treatment partners
could be improved
Models of Service Delivery
Various partners and approaches used based on host country’s needs
District approach allows for sustainability and “standard” approach to C & T service delivery
Working with the public sector reaches the most people and solidifies EGPAF’s relationship with host MOH
Single-service sub-grantee may present challenges with regard to sustainability
Performance-based financing preliminary results are encouraging
Quality of Care/Continuum of Care
Clinical care that is generally based on WHO or national guidelines and standards
Beginning of task-shifting activities at a limited number of sites
Limited access to viral loads, RNA and DNA PCR and second line regimens
Healthcare worker shortages require creative solutions – use of PLWHAs, overtime allowances, task shifting
Variable linkages and integration of C & T with TB and PMTCT
Pediatric C & T lagging behind that of adults Need systematic mechanisms to track
patients lost to follow-up
Community Linkages
Community linkages were not consistently integrated into continuum of care
EGPAF U.S. and country offices beginning to recognize the importance of community and linkages
Varied approaches to implementation of community linkages programs and services
Creative use of PLWHA and expert patients Lack of nutritional support and transport
identified as barriers to continuity of care Limited coordination of referral systems
between community-related groups and C & T sites
Training/Mentoring/ Supportive Supervision/Capacity Building
Successful leveraging of available in-country expertise as a resource for training and guidelines development
High quality initial training in adult and pediatric ART
Methods to measure retention and application of knowledge still need to be determined
Health care worker shortages and rapid turnover of staff
Quantitative Evaluation Systems
Dedicated U.S. support staff to focus on programmatic, technical and M&E issues
Existence of electronic databases in countries which improve patient tracking and efficiency of data management
Attempts to harmonize indicators and develop standard reporting forms
Recognition of the importance of QI mechanisms to improve patient services
Limited feedback and use of data to improve programs
Major Recommendations
Major Recommendations
Continue to take a leadership role in formulating and advocating for policies related to the delivery of C & T, including task-shifting, transportation and supply chain management
Strengthen achievements in pediatric C & T Address issues related to quality of care such as
pediatric enrollment, TB, PMTCT and RCH linkages, health care worker shortages, community linkages and involvement including nutritional support
Develop EGPAF organizational and country specific guidelines and strategic plans for community linkages to ensure that community linkages are integrated into the continuum of care
Major Recommendations (2)
Create additional opportunities for technical discussions and sharing of experiences – Across the PH country office staff – With other treatment partners
Consider collecting indicators that may be more reflective of quality of care outcomes such as improved cohort reporting, additional treatment outcome measures and effectiveness of community linkages
Conduct regular review and assessment of PH programs
Limitations of Assessment
Limited time in clinics Chart audits, clinical observations
or patient interviews not conducted Did not assess PMTCT Did not have opportunity to meet
with non-PEPFAR partners Non-random sample of clinics Language barriers EGPAF staff as part of assessment
team
Next Steps
Share findings with:– EGPAF staff – Project HEART countries– CDC Atlanta and country
offices – International conferences– Peer-reviewed literature
Used findings in PY6 applications Incorporate information and
recommendations into program activities
Acknowledgements
EGPAF U.S. Staff US EGPAF Interviewees
EGPAF Country Office Staff Tanzania Cote d’Ivoire Zambia
GWU SPHHS Alan Greenberg Manya Magnus James Peterson
A special thanks to all those who were interviewed as part of the assessment