Upload
yonah
View
73
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Preparticipation Physical Exam. Jennifer A. Southard, MD, MSc Saint Alphonsus Medical Group Family Medicine and Sports Medicine NP Idaho Fall Conference August 24 , 2013. Objectives. Discuss purpose and timing of PPEs Give Overview of PPE Review 3 key areas: CV, Ortho, Neuro - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The Preparticipation Physical Exam
Jennifer A. Southard, MD, MScSaint Alphonsus Medical Group
Family Medicine and Sports Medicine
NP Idaho Fall ConferenceAugust 24, 2013
ObjectivesDiscuss purpose and timing of PPEsGive Overview of PPEReview 3 key areas: CV, Ortho, NeuroIdentify conditions which warrant further investigation prior to allowing participationDiscuss populations of athletes with special considerationsDiscuss clearing athletes for participation
Purposes of the PPEObjectives of the PPEPrimary Objectives1. Screen for conditions that may be life-threatening or
disabling2. Screen for conditions that may predispose to injury or
illness
Secondary Objectives1. Determine general health2. Serve as an entry point to the healthcare system for
adolescents3. Provide opportunity to initiate discussion on health-
related topics
What the PPE is NOT:PPEs should NOT replace routine health care or comprehensive physicals– The PPE is a screening tool to determine
fitness for athletic participation– The PPE often takes place in a format
which does not allow adequate time for anticipatory guidance
– The PPE often takes place in a format which does not provide adequate privacy to discuss confidential issues
Frequency and Timing of the PPE
Ideally do PPEs 4-6 weeks before athlete’s season to allow for eval/treatment of problemsNFHS: PPE necessary - but leaves to states to mandate & standardizeNCAA recommends & most institutions require annual examsYouth / club sports - no formal requirements
Effectiveness of PPEUnknown as to:Effectiveness of PPE as a screening tool– Lack of efficacy data for PPE – Little effect on morbidity & mortality Ability of PPE to affect outcomes Detect risk for catastrophic events
Is the PPE a good screening tool?Significant burden of disease in populationPreclinical stage is detectable and prevalentEarly detection improves outcome (mortality) with acceptable morbidityScreening tests are acceptable to population, inexpensive, and relatively accurate Effective treatment available for detected disease
Approaches to the PPEHistorically: the HHH exam– Hi, how are ya?– Heart– Hernia
Approaches to the PPEOffice Based: maximizes privacy, allows single examiner to complete entire exam, but inefficient for large groups of people. Recommended methodLocker-Room Approach: allows for one examiner to complete each part of the PPE but is also inefficient for large groups and does not allow for privacyStation-Based: requires multiple examiners, each doing a different part of the exam. Improves efficiency and privacy
The History and Physical
AAFPAAPACSMAMSSMAOSSM
PPE: The HistoryHistory forms are very helpful– athletes and parents should jointly complete a
history form prior to the PPE– Review form: 75% of issues detected through Hx
aloneWeb based history forms may be more convenient for the athletes (ePPE) Preparticipation form recommended by the AAFP, AAP, AMSSM, and AOSSM is available in the Preparticipation Physical Evaluation, 4th ed. 2010.
The Cardiovascular HistoryScreening for conditions that predispose to Sudden Cardiac DeathMost common cause of SCD in US athletes <30 is HCM
AHA GuidelinesCirculation, 2007
Personal History of:– Exertional chest
pain– Syncope/near-
syncope– Excessive fatigue– Prior murmur– Elevated BP
Family history of:– Premature CV
Death– CV disease <50yo– Specific conditions
(ie Marfans, Long QT, HCM, etc)
Maron BJ et al. Circulation 2007;115:1643-1655
AHA GuidelinesA positive finding on >=1 element on history is sufficient to warrant further CV investigationMight include ECG, ECHO, Stress test or referral to cardiology
The Neurologic HistoryAt each PPE, athletes should be asked about previous neurologic problems:– Prior concussions– Previous neck injuries– Previous history of stingers/burners– Seizure history– Current neurologic symptoms
(numbness, tingling, weakness, etc.)– Current learning/emotional problems
Neurologic HistoryConsider baseline neurocognitive studies in athletes who have a history of:– Multiple concussions– School performance problems
– ImPACT testing available to all Boise Public HS students, free, or $15 via STARS
The Musculoskeletal HistoryComplete history of musculoskeletal injuries is important– Operations – Time lost from play– Prior rehabOngoing musculoskeletal complaints – Require a more complete history – Deserve detailed evaluation
Screening for the Female Athlete Triad
All female athletes should be screened for the Female Athlete Triad
WHAT MAKES UP THE FEMALE ATHLETE
TRIAD???
Provider Knowledge 240 health care professionals (physicians, medical
students, physical therapists, athletic trainers and coaches) were surveyed to determine their knowledge and comfort in treating the condition
Results– 48% of physicians, 43% of therapists, 38% of
trainers, 32% of medical students and 8% of coaches could identify all 3 components
– Only 9% of physicians felt comfortable treating the disorder
Troy K, Hoch A, Stavrakos, J. Awareness and comfort in treating the female athlete triad: are we failing our athletes? Wisconsin Medical
Journal. 2006;105(7): 21-24.
Female Athlete Triad History• Not a new entity – various
components have been noted for years
• Defined in 1992 by American College of Sports Medicine
• ACSM developed a Position Statement in 1997• revised statement in 2007
1997 ACSM Position Statement• Syndrome that can
develop in physically active girls and women with three interrelated components:
• Disordered eating• Amenorrhea• Osteoporosis
Otis CL, Drinkwater B, Johnson M, et al. American College of Sports Medicine Position Stand: The female athlete triad. Med Sci Sports
Exerc 1997; 29(5): i-ix.
The Female Athlete Triad Today• 2007 ACSM Definition (Renamed components)
• Disordered Eating• Menstrual Dysfunction• Low Bone Mineral Density (BMD)
• Greater emphasis on the full spectrum of behaviors and conditions within a given disorder.
• The original version focused more on the extreme end point of each disorder.
Beals, K & Meyer, N. Female athlete triad update. Clin Sports Med, 2007;26:69-89.
Who is at Risk?• “Potentially all physically active girls and women
could be at risk for developing 1 or more components of the Triad”
• Sports that emphasize low body weight• Subjective scoring of performance (figure
skating)• Endurance sports (distance running)• Body contour-revealing clothing (track,
cheerleading, volleyball)• Weight categories (wrestling, horse racing)• Emphasis on prepubertal body habitus
(gymnastics)• Male athletes are also at risk for disordered eating
and anorexia nervosa
Prevalence• Disordered Eating: 8% - 62% depending on
population studied. • More prevalent in sports that emphasize lean
physique BUT seen in all sports• Athletes 2.6x more likely than non-athletes to
manifest DE Sx• Burckes-Miller et al: Study 695 NCAA Div I
athletes• 3% met criteria for anorexia nervosa• 21% bulemia
Burckes-Miller ME, Black DR. Male and female college athletes: prevalence of anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Athl Train J Natl Athl Train Assoc. 1988;23: 137-140.
Prevalence• Menstrual Dysfunction: 6% - 79%
depending on definitions used in study• Prevalence of secondary amenorrhea in
adult female collegiate athletes reported at 14-66% compared to 2-5% of the general population
• Low Bone Mineral Density: 22% - 50% (mainly osteopenia)
Nattiv A, Agostini R, Drinkwater B, Yeager KK. The female athlete triad. The inter-relatedness of disordered eating, amenorrhea, and osteoporosis. Clin Sports Med 1994; 13: 405-18.
Prevalence of the Triad Only 3 studies have examined all 3
disorders using direct measures of BMD in female athletes (DEXA)
The prevalence of all three components simultaneously: 0.4% - 2.2%.
Although prevalence small, presence of any of the three should warrant further provider investigation
Beals, K & Meyer, N. Female athlete triad update. Clin Sports Med, 2007;26:69-89.
Etiology In the 1970’s low body weight or low
body fat was thought to be the primary cause of amenorrhea
Exercise-stress hypothesis Deficit in energy availability
Hypothalamic Dysfunction Disruption of
hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis– Decrease in pulsatile
GnRH disrupts pituitary secretion of LH and FSH
– Disruption of LH and FSH pulsatility shuts down stimulation to the ovary, ceasing production of estradiol
What causes hypothalamic dysfunction?
Deficit in energy availability
Energy Availability Dietary energy intake minus exercise
energy expenditure OR The amount of dietary energy remaining
after exercise training to support physiological processes
Loucks A & Nattiv A. The female athlete triad. Lancet 2005; 366:549-550.
Disordered Eating Includes a wide spectrum of unhealthy
eating behaviors– Skipping meals or limiting calorie intake– Restricting certain foods such as those
high in fat or protein– Binge eating or purging– Diet pills, laxatives, diuretics– Anorexia nervosa– Bulimia nervosa
Disordered Eating May be intentional
or unintentional– Lose a few pounds
before an event– “Inadvertently
failing to balance energy expenditures with adequate energy intake”
2007 ACSM Definition:Menstrual Dysfunction
Includes the full spectrum of menstrual irregularities. Luteal suppression Anovulation Oligomenorrhea Amenorrhea
Primary – redefined by American Society of Reproductive Medicine as absence of menstruation by 15 years of age in girls with secondary sex characteristics
Secondary – absence of 3 consecutive cyclesBeals, K & Meyer, N. Female athlete triad update. Clin Sports
Med, 2007;26:69-89.
Menstrual Dysfunction Prevalence studies
Wide range (2-35%) of prevalence estimates can be explained by methodologic differences among studies differences in athletic populations studied failure to control for OCP use assessment and definition of menstrual
dysfunction Despite differences, menstrual dysfunction is
more prevalent in sports that emphasize leanness
Menstrual dysfunction is NOT a normal part of training!
Beals, K & Meyer, N. Female athlete triad update. Clin Sports Med, 2007;26:69-89.
2007 ACSM Definition: Low Bone Mineral Density
Emphasis has been placed on the full spectrum of bone health. Low bone mass Stress fractures Osteoporosis
Bone strength is characterized by bone mineral content and density as well as quality of bone
Bone quality refers to the process of bone turnover
Beals, K & Meyer, N. Female athlete triad update. Clin Sports Med, 2007;26:69-89.
Bone Health Estrogen suppresses osteoclast activity Female athletes have higher BMD than nonathletic
counterparts UNLESS they have menstrual dysfunction Bone density declines in proportion to the number of
menstrual cycles missed Myburgh and colleagues showed a direct correlation
between time spent amenorrheic and number of stress fractures
Low bone mineral density may be irreversible resulting in a lifetime lower bone density Multiple studies show irreplaceable bone loss after 3
years amenorrhea Risk of stress fractures is two-four fold higher in
athletes with menstrual disturbances compared to those without
Bone Health Females gain more than
50% of skeletal mass during adolescence and reach peak bone mass between 18 and 25 years of age
Young women menstrual dysfunction during these years are at risk for losing 2% of bone mass annually instead of gaining 2-4%
Bone Density Consider DEXA for
the following: Amenorrheic >
one year BMI < 19 Documented
history of stress fracture
Lo B, Hebert C, McClean A. The female athlete triad, no pain, no gain? Clinical Pediatrics 2003; 42(7) 573-580.
How Should Athletes be evaluated for the Triad?
Evaluation Options History Questionnaire (easy and
effective) All
Blood Tests (measure ovarian steroid hormones) High Risk
Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) High Risk
History Female Athlete Triad Coalition
Screening Questionnaire (ACSM and IOC):– 12 Questions– Sensitivity 91.5%– Specificity 74.2%– False Positive 25.8 %– False negative 38.5%
Black DR, et al. Physiologic Screening Test for Eating Disorders/Disordered Eating Among Female Collegiate Athletes. Journal of Athletic Training. 2003:38; 4; 286-297.
IHSAA PPE Questions (3/12 similar questions)
When was your first menstrual period?
When was your last menstrual period?
What was the longest time between periods last year?
9 questions not on IHASS PPE Do you worry that you have lost
control over how much you eat? Do you make yourself vomit, use
diuretics or laxatives after you eat? Do you currently or have you ever
suffered from an eating disorder? Do you ever eat in secret? Have you ever had a stress fracture?
9 questions not on IHASS PPE
Are you unhappy with your weight? Are you trying to gain or lose weight? Has anyone recommended you
change your weight or eating habits? Do you limit or carefully control what
you eat?
Laboratory Evaluation CBC, CMP, ESR, Ferritin, VitB12, Folate, UA EKG and/or echocardiogram if abnormal cardiac
exam TSH Pregnancy test for amennorhea LH, FSH to rule out premature ovarian failure Prolactin to rule out pituitary tumor
Consider imaging If hirsutism, free testosterone, DHEA-S, 17-
hydroxy-progesterone to screen for adrenal or ovarian tumors
Progesterone Challenge Medroxyprogesterone 5-10 mg for 5-10 days
Lo B, Hebert C, McClean A. The female athlete triad, no pain, no gain? Clinical Pediatrics 2003; 42(7) 573-580.
Treatment Goal Restore reproductive and metabolic
hormones by increasing energy availability Increase energy intake Reduce energy expenditure
Weight gain of 1-2 kilograms (or 2-3%) or 10% decrease in exercise load in either duration or intensity is often sufficient to reverse reproductive dysfunction!
Loucks A & Nattiv A. The female athlete triad. Lancet 2005; 366:549-550
Treatment Options Educate Correct energy deficit
– Increase calories by 10% per week until target is reached.
– Decrease activity levels to assist in correcting energy deficit.
– Limit weight gain to 1-2 pounds per week
Treatment Options Add Calcium and Vit D supplement Treatment for osteoporosis with
bisphosphonates and calcitonin has not been tested in younger patients, nor patients with female athletic triad
Hormone Therapy No published longitudinal studies available on
long term benefits of HRT to slow or reverse loss of BMD – Longest studies currently available 60 months– Several good studies show irreplaceable bone
loss occurs after three years of amenorrhea Minimal 4-11% BMD increases have been noted
in women with hypothalamic amenorrhea on oral contraceptives– increases in BMD of 6-17% have been seen
with spontaneous reversal of amenorrhea– Increases slow to 3% following year and
plateau at BMD well below normal for ageGoodman, L & Warren, M. The female athlete and menstrual function.
Adolescent and Pediatric Gynecology. 2005;17(5): 466-470.
Hormone Replacement
Retrospective study of amenorrheic runners compared HRT with placebo over 24-30 months Combined estrogen and progesterone Pt’s on HRT showed 3.7% increase in BMD Pt’s in control showed decrease of 2.4% BMD
In women who have not responded to non-pharmacological treatment, initiate therapy with low-dose oral contraceptive to raise estrogen concentrations and prevent further bone loss
Progesterone should be included in any tx regimen to prevent endometrial hyperplasia
Cumming DC. Exercise-associated amenorrhea, low bone density, and estrogen replacement therapy. Arch Intern Med 1996; 156: 2193-5.
Treatment of Eating Disorder Depending on severity SSRI may be
indicated Avoid bupropion because risk of sz TCAs and MAOIs cold be toxic in
underweight pts Consider Cognitive Behavioral
Therapy Consider psychiatric evaluation
Treatment of Eating Disorder
– Recovery rates vary between 23% and 50%, and relapses range from 4% to 27%.
– Even for those who recover, one study indicated that recovery took between four and nearly seven years.
– Depending on the duration of the study, anorexic patients have reported death rates ranging from 4% to 25%.
PREVENTION! Educational programs targeting coaches,
athletes, parents, athletic trainers, school administrators– Currently there is a lack of such
programs Nutrition education
– Emphasis should be placed on concept of food as energy for training and recovery rather than on body weight
Resources NCAA Handbook: “Managing the Female Athlete
Triad” www.ncaa.org/wps/wcm/connect/resources/file/ebad9e4a146e2d0/handbook.pdf
Academy for Eating Disorders: www.aedweb.org International Olympic Committee Position Stand on
the Female Athlete Triad: www.multimedia.olympic.org/pdf/en_report_917.pdf
Female Athlete Triad Coalition: www.femaleathletetriad.org
National Osteoporosis Foundation: www.nof.org National Eating Disorders Association:
www.nationaleatingdisorders.org
Other Important Historical Issues
Respiratory- h/o asthma or allergic problemsInfectious- h/o HBV, HCV, HIV, EBVDerm- Herpes gladiatorum, current rashesHematologic- Sickle Cell, bleeding disordersEndo- diabetesOther- prior heat-related illness, sickle trait
The PhysicalEach PPE should include vitals, examination of HEENT, CV, RESP, ABD, GU (males only), MSK, DERM, and NEURO systemsForms, such as the one published in the Preparticipation Physical Evaluation, 4th ed. , 2010, may be helpful.
The PhysicalGeneral: Attention for excessive height, Marfanoid appearanceVitals: especially important to check BP. Also Ht, Wt, BMI.
Pediatric age and height percentile BP graphsHEENT: Visual acuity, pupils, conjunctivae, lenses, ear exam, oropharyngeal exam
If unable to correct to better than or equal to 20/40 in each eye, need further evaluation and eye protection
RESP: resp effort, wheezes, crackles, etc.ABD: masses, splenomegaly
The PhysicalCV: Auscultation, Femoral/Radial pulses, BP, provocative maneuvers for HCM– Systolic Murmur that increases in
volume/intensity with Valsalva or with going from supine seated
– Murmur of HCM will diminish with squatting or other maneuvers to increase venous return to the heart
Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Further Eval.: CV FindingsFindings requiring further evaluation:– Systolic Murmur that is 3/6 or greater– ANY diastolic murmur– ANY murmur which increases in intensity with
Valsalva– Any FH of SCD or predisposing condition (Long
QT, Marfans, AVRD, HCM) or worrisome personal hx
The Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Murmur:– Cres-Decres systolic murmur heard best at LLSB– Increases with maneuvers to decrease venous
return (eg Valsalva, lying to standing) – Decreases with maneuvers to increase VR (ie
squatting)
The PhysicalGU (males only): hernia, mass, undescended testicle. Instruction on TSE Derm: Rashes, lesionsNeurologic: strength testing incorporated into MSK exam; more extensive evaluation required for pts with neurologic complaintsExtremity: arachnodactyly
The PhysicalThe Musculoskeletal Exam:– Asymptomatic pts: General Screening
Exam only– Pts with specific complaints: Gen.
Screening Exam PLUS a joint specific exam
– Sport Specific Exam: consider doing a more complete joint exam for commonly injured joints (Shoulders in swimmers and throwers, Knees in athletes who do cutting maneuvers, etc.)
Beyond the PhysicalAre more tests necessary?
JOHN RUSKIN (1819-1900)
“A thing is worth precisely what it can do for you not what you choose to pay for it”
Beyond the Physical: Screening Labs?
Screening labs are NOT recommended at routine PPE’sSome sport governing bodies require lab tests for performance enhancing substancesNCAA requires sickle trait screeningCaptive adolescents: should we screen for STIs?– Recent paper in J Adol Health found the
following:Males 2.8% + for chlamydia, 0.7% + for gonorrheaFemales 6.5% + for chlamydia, 2.0% + for gonorrhea93.1% of all positives reported NO SYMPTOMS.
Nsuami M et al. J Adolesc Health, 2003, p336-339.
Beyond the Physical: Screening CV Studies?
The Italians:– Since 1982 Italy has screened ALL
athletes with PPE, EKG, as well as Stress tests and ECHO’s for Elite/Olympic athletes
– 2.5% of all athletes screened were disqualified, 51% due to CV probs.
Beyond the Physical: Screening CV Studies?
Baseline rate of SCD prior to initiation of screening protocol was 3.6/100000After initiation of screening, rate of SCD fell to 0.4/100000 (89% reduction)Sounds really compelling for routine use of ECGs, right?
Corrado D et al. JAMA 2006;296(13):1593-1601.
But Italy is not the USA…
Risk of SCD Now Equivalent in Italy and US
2001-2006 Risk of SCD in US is 0.61/100000In Italy, the EXCESS risk from SCD (3.6/100000) was related to ARVDBy doing EKG/ECHO, the risk to Italian athletes is reduced to a comparable risk that exists in the US
Maron BJ et al. Circulation, 2009;119:1085-1092
Beyond the Physical:Screening CV Studies?
Lausanne Recommendations of the European Society of Cardiology, 2006– Similar screening questions to AHA– Similar physical screening exam to AHA– Adds 12-lead ECG after onset of puberty
for all athletesEndorsed by IOC
Beyond the Physical:Screening CV Studies?
AHA recommends against cardiovascular screening of asymptomatic athletes with ECG or Echo Not practical for mass, universal screening – Size of athlete cohort (huge)– Prevalence of disease (low)– Limited resources ($$, personnel)– Absence of physician workforce to interpret
ECG– Potential to create anxiety with False positive
results (morbidity)
Beyond the Physical: Screening CV Studies?
Feinstein et al. in 1993 did 1570 ECHOs on asymptomatic athletes, found no conditions which would preclude competition, at a cost of $500/testEpstein and Maron estimated in 1986 that ECHO alone would prevent 1 death per 200,000 athletes, at a total cost of $100,000,000 per life saved
Beyond the Physical:Screening Neurologic Studies?Currently, the NHL, NFL, many colleges, and increasing numbers of high schools require screening neuropsychological testing for athletes involved in contact/collision sportsPreseason neuropsych testing allows each individual to provide his/her own control for comparison should a head injury occur during the seasonImPACT testing for BPS athletes
Further Eval: Prior Head Trauma
Prior concussion is an independent risk factor increasing risk for subsequent concussionRecurrent concussion increases risk for learning, emotional, and cognitive problemsIn pts with h/o concussion, consider baseline neuropsychological evaluationConsider neuropsych eval in kids with school performance problems (baseline study)
Further Eval: MSK InjuriesFindings of new/recent injuries on PPE deserve appropriate evaluation and treatmentFindings of inadequately rehabilitated injuries on exam should be followed up for several reasons:– Risk of re-injury or injury to others– Risk of long term complications
(arthritis, etc)
Athletes with Special Considerations
Special Populations of Athletes
Athletes with Down’s SyndromeParalympics / Handicapped AthletesAthletes with one-organ or functionally one-organedAthletes s/p transplantAthletes with specific medical problems: bleeding disorders, infectious diseases, etc.
Athlete’s with Trisomy 21Cardiovascular Abnormalities– 50% of children with Down Syndrome have
congenital heart diseaseHypothyroidism– Occurs in 15% of kids with T-21– Should be screened annually
Atlantoaxial Instability– Should be screened for with flex/ext C-spine
films at age 3 years– Required for participation in Special Olympics
or contact sports
The Functionally One-Organed Athlete
Concern is for damage to the “good” organ:– Ophtho: athletes with one eye or whose
best corrected vision is worse than 20/40Recommend appropriate protective equipment
– Renal: athlete’s s/p nephrectomyRecommend appropriate protective equipment
– GU: male’s s/p orchiectomyRecommend appropriate protective equipment
Bottom Line- we are ALL one-organed athletes competing w/ 1 brain, liver, pancreas, etc.
We’ve Got Clearance, Clarence
Clearing Athletes for Participation
3.1% to 13.9% of athletes are initially not cleared pending further evaluation.Ultimately, 0.3% to 1.3% are denied clearanceOptions for Clearance:– Cleared without restriction– Cleared, pending evaluation or treatment of a
specific problem– Disqualified
Letter of clearance/DQ should be reviewed with athlete, athlete should sign release of information form, form should be passed on to coach/trainer
Conditions Which May Require Disqualification
Final ThoughtsThe PPE is an important skill for all providers to be comfortable withThe PPE does not replace routine health care maintenance visitsCV, neurologic, and orthopedic abnormalities may require further evaluation prior to clearanceVast majority of athletes screened will be permitted to participate without restriction
Selected ReferencesKurowski K and S Chandran. The preparticipation athletic evaluation. American Family Physician,May 2000. p2683-98Lyznicki JM et al. Cardiovascular screening of student athletes. American Family Physician,Aug 2000. p765-84Preparticipation Physical Evaluation, 4th ed., 2010Madden CC and M Putukian. The Preparticipation Physical Evaluation, Team Physician’s Handbook, 3rd ed., 2002, pp20-35.Barrett JR et al. The Preparticipation Physical Evaluation, Care of The Young Athlete, 2000. pp. 43-56.Nsuami M et al. Screening for sexually transmitted diseases during preparticipation sports examination of high school adolescents. Journal of Adol Health May 2003, pp 336-339.
Selected ReferencesMaron BJ et al. Cardiovascular Preparticipation Screening of Competitive Athletes. Circulation, Aug 1996, pp850-856.Fuller CM. Cost effectiveness analysis of screening of high school athletes for risk of sudden cardiac death. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2000, pp887-890.Corrado D et al. Screening for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in young athletes. NEJM 6 Aug 1998, pp364-369.Pelliccia A and BJ Maron. Preparticipation cardiovascular evaluation of the competitive athlete: perspectives from the 30 year Italian experience. Am J of Card. 15 April 95, pp827-829.
Selected ReferencesMaron BJ et al. Sudden Deaths in Young Competitive Athletes, Circulation, 2009:119:1085-1092Corrado D et al. Trends in Sudden Cardiovascular Death in Young Competitive Athletes After Implementation of a Preparticipation Screening Program. JAMA 2006;296(13):1593-1601.Maron BJ et al. Recommendations and considerations related to preparticipation screening for cardiovascular abnormalities in competitive athletes, 2007 Update. Circulation 2007;115:1643-1655Bille K et al. Sudden cardiac death in athletes: the Lausanne recommendations. European Journal of Cardiovascular prevention and rehabilitation. 2006;13:859-875
Thanks!Contact Info: [email protected] Emerald: 367-41706533 Emerald St., Boise, ID