19
Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011 potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution event at urban and regional scales 1/ What do we see with IASI for pollution events 2/ What is the potentiel for IRS/MTG?

The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events at urban and regional scales

  • Upload
    heaton

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events at urban and regional scales. 1/ What do we see with IASI for pollution events 2/ What is the potentiel for IRS/MTG?. Fires , Moscow area, summer 2010. IASI - CO. 2010 Fires in Central Russia. IASI-CO July 22  Aug. 22. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events

at urban and regional scales

1/ What do we see with IASI for pollution events

2/ What is the potentiel for IRS/MTG?

Page 2: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

Fires, Moscow area, summer 2010

Page 3: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

CO total columns from the IASI/MetOp observations (FORLI-CO) from July 22 to August 22, 2010. Data averaged over 3 days on a 0.5°x0.5° grid – only daytime with CO above 2.2 1018 molecules/cm2

Animation by Maya George (LATMOS)

CO concentration up to 6 times above safe levels in Moscow

IASI-COJuly 22 Aug. 22

IASI - CO

2010 Fires in Central Russia

Page 4: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011Potential of IRS-MTG to detect high pollution events at urban and regional scalesESA-ESTEC, June 2008

Concentration en ozone fin juillet 2007

Pollution peaksOzone measurements

Page 5: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

October 0-8 km column

April0-8 km column

IASI - Ozone

Page 6: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

Ammonia hotspotswith IASI

Page 7: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

Ammonia 2008 average – IASI data

… dealing with a signal hardly detectable …

Clarisse et al., Nature Geo 2009

Page 8: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

Eyjafjöll eruption, Iceland, april-mai 2010

Page 9: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

IASI ash detection – first event

Page 10: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

14 PM15 AM

15PM

16 AM

16PM17 AM17 PM 18 AM

IASI ash detection – first event

Page 11: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

morning evening

Thermal contrast, IASI data

-Controlled pollutants are O3, CO, NO2, SO2, PM + NH3;Ozone: peaks in the afternoon. Alert levels exceeded several days per year. Current prediction scores around 50%.CO: Alert levels exceeded only when big fire events occur.

Detection of pollution peaks with IR instruments

Thermal contrast is higher during the day and during the spring/summer, over land.

Page 12: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

Spectral resolution and samplingMOPD sampling FWHM of non-apodized ILS

0.8 cm 0.625 cm-1 0.75cm-1 IRS-MTG

4.0 cm 0.125 cm-1 0.15cm-1 Sentinel 4 (goal)

2.0 cm 0.250 cm-1 0.30cm-1 Sentinel 4 (Threshold)

Radiometric noiseNEDT (of 280K blackbody) NESR

0.20 K 2.45 10-8 W/cm2 sr cm-1 IRS-MTG

0.05 K 6.08 10-9 W/cm2 sr cm-1 Sentinel 4 (goal)

0.10 K 1.22 10-8 W/cm2 sr cm-1

IRS-MTG

Sentinel 4 (goal)

Sentinel 4 (threshold)

IRS-MTG IRS3: OPD = 0.8 cm NEDT = 0.2K

Ozone with IRS/MTG

Page 13: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

OPD = 0.8 cmNEDT = 0.2K

OPD = 0.8 cmNEDT = 0.05K

OPD = 4 cmNEDT = 0.2 K

Varying spectral resolution and noise= 0.96; T = 0 K

IRS-MTG

Relaxing spectral resolution and/or radiometric noiseloss of vertical sensitivity in the lower troposphere

Vertical sensitivity

Results for ozone

Page 14: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

MTG-IRS

Sentinel 4 (FWHM threshold)Sentinel 4 ( FWHM goal)

DOFS

Varying spectral resolution and noise= 0.96; T = 0 K

Summary

Results for ozone

a priori variability

MTG-IRS

PBL (0-2 km) column

LT (0-6 km) column

a priori variability

MTG-IRS

MOPD=0.8 cm (IRS-MTG)MOPD = 2.0 cm (Sentinel 4 threshold)MOPD = 4.0 cm (Sentinel 4 goal)

Page 15: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

Spectral resolution and samplingMOPD sampling FWHM of non-apodized ILS

0.8 cm 0.625 cm-1 0.75cm-1 IRS-MTG

4.0 cm 0.125 cm-1 0.15cm-1 Sentinel 4 (goal) 2.0 cm 0.250 cm-1 0.30cm-1

1.0 cm 0.500 cm-1 0.60cm-1 Sentinel 4 (Threshold)

Radiometric noiseNEDT (of 280K blackbody) NESR

0.85 K 6.12 10-9 W/cm2 sr cm-1 IRS-MTG

0.05 K 3.60 10-10 W/cm2 sr cm-1 Sentinel 4 (goal)

0.15 K 1.08 10-9 W/cm2 sr cm-1

IRS-MTG

Sentinel 4 (goal)

Sentinel 4 (threshold)

IRS-MTG IRS7: OPD = 0.8 cm NEDT = 0.85K

Carbon monoxide with IRS/MTG

Page 16: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

OPD = 0.8 cmNEDT = 0.85K

OPD = 4 cmNEDT = 0.05K

OPD = 1 cmNEDT = 0.15 K

Varying spectral resolution and noise= 0.96; T = 0 K

IRS-MTG Sentinel 4 - Goal Sentinel 4 – Thr.

• Only Sentinel (goal) provides vertically resolved information in the troposphere• Lowering the noise (IRS-MTGSentinel 4 Threshold increases sensitivity to the lower troposphere

Vertical sensitivity

Results for carbon monoxide

Page 17: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

10%

MTG-IRS

Sentinel 4 threshold

a priori variability

DOFS Total column error

Varying spectral resolution and noise= 0.96; T = 0 K

NeDT 0.85 KNeDT 0.15 KNeDT 0.05 K

Sentinel 4 goal

MTG-IRS

Sentinel 4 threshold

Sentinel 4 goal

DOFS of 1 for MTG-IRSUp to 3 for Sentinel 4 - goal

13 % on total CO column for MTG-IRSDown to 5 % for Sentinel 4 - goal

A. Sensitivity analysesSummary

Results for carbon monoxide

Page 18: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

Conclusions

The levels of all controlled pollutants (NO2, SO2, CO, O3, PM10 and PM2.5) are continuously decreasing over Europe, except for O3. The warning and alert levels of the latter are exceeded every year, and it will be worse in the future. Ozone peaks occur between 12 and 15 pm.Levels of pollution for CO are exceeded when fire events occur.

With the current MTG/IRS specifications:

Ozone DOFS around 3.5 single information in the troposphere CO DOFS around 1 total column

Error on the tropospheric column is around 15 %Impact of thermal contrast : Impact is in the lower troposphere. The error on the tropospheric column reaches ~ 10 % for positive values of T

Page 19: The potential of MTG-IRS to detect high pollution events  at urban and regional scales

Cathy Clerbaux, Geocape meeting, May 2011

Conclusions Although the instrumental specifications for MTG-IRS are not optimized for chemistry, the instrument will provide tropospheric columns of O3 and CO, with significant improvement on our prior knowledge, for high pollution events (photochemical pollution in the case of ozone; fires in the case of CO). The diurnal variability might be difficult to capture if thermal contrast remains low. However, as ozone pollution mainly occurs along with high temperatures, pollution peaks will likely be monitored.

One may expect to take benefit of the high sampling rate of the MTG sounder (0.5 hour over Europe) in order to set-up a specific retrieval strategy that would use the information at different times of the day (hence different thermal contrast) to extract the peak pollution events at the right time and place. Moreover the smaller MTG-IRS pixel size (4 km) would allow to average data in order to increase accuracy.

NH3 might also be measurable to some extent.

For volcano: main SO2 band missing but ashes detection OK