Upload
idalia
View
25
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The politics of reporting poverty statistics in South Africa: anatomy of a media debate. Guy Berger, IAMCR July 2008. Introduction. Summary of the issue Lining up the theory Description of research data Analysis and conclusion. Summary of the issue. Politicisation of poverty. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The politics of reporting poverty statistics in South Africa: anatomy of a media
debateGuy Berger, IAMCR July 2008
Introduction
1. Summary of the issue2. Lining up the theory3. Description of research
data4. Analysis and conclusion
Summary of the issue
• Politicisation of poverty
Thabo Mbeki 2000 -
Pro-poor platform
Rival: Jacob Zuma
Populist
• SAIRR: –1996: 1.9 million < $1 a day– 2005: 4.2 million
Uniqueness of debate
• Most poverty coverage:– Disconnects manifestations of poverty
(eg. poverty, homelessness, hunger)– Disconnects concept and policy of
“poverty” from manifestations
• Here, these all had to be connected to contest the point.
Bombshell
• 3
Appropriating Western theory
CDA:• Repertoire,
genre, style, networks of practice.
Norman Fairclough
Building theoretical bridges
• Salience, media-frames, cultural frames, cause-morality-cure, headlines.
• Keywords, phrases, stereotypes.
William Gamson
Robert Entman
Research data
• 25 articles–3 news–11 opinion pieces (9 non-
journalists)–8 letters
• 13 in Business Day & Weekender• 7 from SAIRR, 3 from government• 0 from poor, NGOs, unions
Frames
1. Inadequacies of journalism:– Lack of scrutiny and value-add; – “Press had field day” (press-bashing).
2. Personalisation of the issues:– “Mbeki attacks Institute of Race
Relations”– “President in war with race body over
poverty”.
Frames
1. Politicisation:
Frames
Frames
1. Politicisation also works by:– ‘ideology’ accusations both sides– Frame expansion: labour laws as
problem.
More frames
4. Conceptualisation of poverty: money-metric vs social wage– Relevance to winning the debate.
More frames
5. Statistics: – Comparing apples & oranges &
diff PDLs– Proportions vs absolute figures
6. Empiricism vs scepticism vs “hunch”-ism– “shoddy”, “inadequacy of stats”,
“it would be surprising if…”
Yet more frames7. International legitimation
around $1 a day– Problem of exchange rate issues (govt); – You use the measure yourself (SAIRR).
8. Dominant consensus vs dissident SAIRR
– “Not one of SA’s poverty experts would argue…” – Miriam Altman
– “We doubt such consensus exists” - SAIRR
Final frames
9. Agenda-switching:– “stop nitpicking”– “surely our top economists would
be better occupied…”
10. Responsibility pointing:– Blame govt, population growth,
economy, liberals.
Conclusion
• Analysis shows themes from frames are rhetorical, more than media frames.
• Debate never resolved: media played role of elite forum only.
Taking stock textually:
• SAIRR won the debate – in terms of volume & reason
Research qtn: media centrism
• BUT: political frame may be the most important – beware of CDA and Frame assumption that texts “talk”, and have influence…
• Because: “White” SAIRR vs black govt.
• In the end, the absent players (at least some) had their say: Mbeki lost his ANC post to Zuma a month later!
On the other hand…