Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
0
Prepared by THE MIDDLE GEORGIA REGIONAL COMMISSION 175 EMERY HIGHWAY SUITE C, MACON, GEORGIA 31217 TELEPHONE: 478-751-6160
Monroe County RURAL TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN 2018-2022
1
Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... 3
Purpose ..................................................................................................................................................... 3
Methodology ............................................................................................................................................. 3
Plan Update ............................................................................................................................................ 4
Demographic Analysis .................................................................................................................................. 5
Middle Georgia Profile .............................................................................................................................. 5
Age Distribution ........................................................................................................................................ 6
Monroe County Profile .............................................................................................................................. 6
Monroe County Age Distribution .............................................................................................................. 6
Elderly ....................................................................................................................................................... 7
Income Levels ............................................................................................................................................ 7
Commuting Patterns ................................................................................................................................. 7
Persons with Disabilities ............................................................................................................................ 9
Special Populations ................................................................................................................................... 9
Summary ................................................................................................................................................. 10
Evaluation of Existing Services ................................................................................................................... 11
Department of Human Services (DHS) .................................................................................................... 11
Public Transportation .............................................................................................................................. 13
Private Transit Service ............................................................................................................................. 13
Demand Estimation and Transit Needs Assessment ................................................................................. 14
Demand Estimation ................................................................................................................................. 14
Transit Needs Assessment ....................................................................................................................... 15
Land Use .................................................................................................................................................. 15
Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................................................. 17
Transit Alternatives and Recommendations ............................................................................................. 18
Ride Share ............................................................................................................................................... 18
Bicycle/Pedestrian ................................................................................................................................... 18
Expansion of Existing Programs .............................................................................................................. 19
Limited Fixed Route Transit ..................................................................................................................... 19
Coordinated Transit Delivery ................................................................................................................... 19
Implementation Timeline .......................................................................................................................... 20
2
Appendices Appendix A – Report of Accomplishments Appendix B – Maps
3
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Purpose
The primary purpose of the Monroe County Transit Development Plan (TDP) is to serve as a preliminary needs assessment and planning tool for community leaders regarding the provision of transit services in Monroe County. The Transit Development Plan is a strategic guide for public transportation in Monroe County over the next five years.
According to the Community Transportation Association of America (CTAA), more than one‐third of
America’s population lives outside of urbanized areas. Nearly 40 percent of the country’s transit- dependent population – primarily senior citizens, persons with disabilities and low‐income individuals
– resides in rural areas. Yet in many rural communities, public and community transportation is extremely limited or absent. The demographics, mobility needs, and resources of rural areas are much different than those of urban areas.
Public transportation is a vital component in most rural communities, with Monroe County being no different. The availability of public transportation provides options to senior citizens, those without vehicles, and those who are physically or economically disadvantaged. Providing a transportation alternative for those who live in a rural area is just as important as for those who live in a high density metropolitan setting.
The availability of reliable public transportation improves the quality of life in rural communities across the state by providing safe, efficient and economical service. It also serves as a vital component necessary for a healthy economy. The next five years in Monroe County are pivotal to shaping public mobility strategies to best help enhance the county’s continued growth and economic opportunities.
Methodology
The Monroe County Rural Transit Development Plan was made possible through funding provided by the Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT). The plan was prepared by the Middle Georgia Regional Commission (MGRC) and represents the views of the author, who is responsible for the facts and accuracy of the data presented herein. The opinions, findings, and conclusions in this publication are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the official views or policies of those of the Department of Transportation, State of Georgia or the Federal Highway Administration. This publication does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation.
The Transit Development Plan includes an evaluation of existing services, an examination of other relevant studies and plans, a review and analysis of demographic data and travel behavior characteristics, the development of transit‐related goals and objectives, a demand estimation and
needs assessment, proposed transit alternatives, enhancements and recommendations and an implementation timeline.
4
Plan Update
In 2018, with funding assistance provided by the Georgia Department of Transportation, the Middle Georgia Regional Commission performed a comprehensive update to the community’s 2013 Transit
Development Plan.
During update of the Transit Development Plan, all sections were re‐examined and modified
accordingly. Additionally, local staff were re‐engaged in order to assess progress on community goals
and objectives and to solicit inputs on additional transit alternatives and implementation activities. The plan was further enhanced with updated data tables, photos and maps. A Report of Accomplishments is contained in Appendix A reflecting the status of implementation activities originally identified in the 2013 Transit Development Plan.
5
DEMOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS
Middle Georgia Profile
The Middle Georgia Region is comprised of 11 counties. These include Baldwin, Bibb, Crawford, Houston, Jones, Monroe, Peach, Pulaski, Putnam, Twiggs, and Wilkinson Counties (see Service Area Map in Appendix B). According to the July 1, 2016, U.S. Census population estimates, the current total population of the middle Georgia region is 494,668 residents. This represents an increase of 69,803 residents or a 16.6 percent rate of growth from 2010.
Given a total land area of 3,549.9 square miles, the current population density of Middle Georgia equals 140 persons per square mile. A significant trend, in terms of population density for Middle Georgia, is the foreseeable rise in total population density across the region. With an observed rise in total population over time, and a finite amount of land, it is only expected that density will continue to increase.
Special planning considerations will be necessary to ensure that the cities and counties of Middle Georgia continue to meet increasing infrastructure needs and demand for community services brought about by the ongoing population growth. Socio‐economic conditions will also continue to
change as the area experiences additional development. Thoughtful consideration is necessary to anticipate the parameters and impacts brought about by these changes. The following table displays the compiled and predicted total population figures for the 11 Middle Georgia counties. The current population of Monroe County is slightly below the predictions at 27,044 residents, but these numbers are likely to change with the 2020 Census.
Population Contributions by County
County 1990 2000 2010 2015 2017 2020 2025 2030
Baldwin 39,567 44,700 45,720 48,930 44,906 46,120 47,390 48,590
Crawford 9,030 12,495 12,630 13,690 12,295 12,900 13,660
14,430
Houston 89,662 110,765 139,900 150,710 153,479 158,230 166,220 174,280
Jones 20,798 23,639 28,669 30,620 28,470 30,570 33,200 35,980
Macon-Bibb 150,288 153,887 155,547 158,590 152,663 153,980 155,530 156,790
Monroe 17,179 21,757 26,424 27,600 27,113 29,010 31,300 33,700
Peach 21,265 23,668 27,695 28,960 27,099 27,520 28,640 29,750
Pulaski 8,122 9,588 12,010 10,210 11,201 11,380 11,540 11,680
Putnam 14,261 18,812 21,218 22,030 21,730 22,090 22,850 23,580
Twiggs 9,832 10,590 9,023 10,460 8,174 8,200 8,220 8,240
Wilkinson 10,261 10,220 9,563 10,170 8,959 9,150 9,200 9,240
Sources: U.S. Census Bureau/ Woods & Poole Economics, Inc.
6
Age Distribution Age distribution for the middle Georgia region mirrors that of the State of Georgia and depicts a steadily aging population. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, the increase is driven by the number of people born during the “Baby Boom” after War World II (1946-1964). For example, the highest percentage of the population in 1980 falls into the 44 and younger categories. In 1990, the larger percentage moved up to the 45 and older age groups. Finally, in both 2000 and 2010, the largest percentage of the population in the region and the state is the 55 to 64 age group.
Monroe County Profile
In Middle Georgia, there is a distinct disparity between urban and rural communities. For example, Macon-Bibb and Houston Counties contain a fast‐paced, urbanized feel within their more densely populated area. Monroe County, along with much of the region, is more rural and more sparsely populated. However, Monroe County’s proximity to Macon-Bibb to the south and Atlanta to the north make it a popular destination for citizens who wish to commute to these larger urban areas for employment purposes but prefer to reside in a more rural or suburban setting.
The current total population of Monroe County is 27,044 according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Monroe County’s total population has grown steadily since 2000, with an increase of 24.3 percent.
The City of Forsyth has also experienced population growth over the same time period. Forsyth’s
population increased slightly from 3,776 residents in 2000 to 3,788 in 2010, a growth rate of 0.32 percent. The small City of Culloden saw a decrease in population over the same timeframe, going from 223 residents in 2000 to 175 in 2010.
Future population estimates project continued growth at a rate of 20 percent between now and the year 2030. This projected rate of growth for Monroe County is expected to be higher than most surrounding counties. Given the location of Monroe County along the I‐75 corridor between Atlanta and Macon-Bibb it is highly likely that the county will continue to experience significant population growth in the coming years. Transportation needs for this rapidly growing population similarly build the case for expanded transit service in the county.
Monroe County Age Distribution
The age distribution of the population, and recent changes in that distribution, has important implications for the demand for transit services within the county. The population of Monroe County has steadily been aging with the largest percentage of the population in the 55-64 age range as opposed to the 40-49 age range in past years. Though the population is aging a large percentage of individuals are under the age of 18 (21.2%). This is particularly important from a public transportation perspective in that both age groups tend to be high users of public transit.
Youth under the age of 15 tend to use transit services extensively where it is available, as they have not yet reached driving age, and transit offers a degree of independence from parents in accessing afterschool programs and recreational activities. For the most part, the transit needs of Monroe County’s youth are not served due to the absence of available transit service. This should be
7
considered a key target population if transit service is eventually considered and implemented.
Elderly
Monroe County, like much of the region, is characterized by a high percentage of older residents. Availability of transportation services for the elderly is certainly a quality of life issue, as elderly residents who can access transportation services are able to more fully participate in community activities. It is also a health and safety issue, as elderly residents without cars must be able to access healthcare. Many elderly residents with cars would be safer in a transit vehicle than behind the wheel of a motor vehicle. Finally, providing transportation services for elderly residents can be a matter of cost effectiveness, as providing services such as transportation that allow elderly residents to maintain independence and live in their own homes is less expensive than supporting them in a nursing home.
Assessing the potential impact of a rapidly growing elderly population is essential in successfully planning future community transit needs. The elderly population is a category of individuals that have a higher dependence on transit services, as the ability to drive diminishes as individuals become older. Most Americans are going to live for a number of years after they cease driving. Transportation planning and coordination, supported with sufficient investment in transit alternatives, can help Monroe County more effectively and efficiently meet the needs of their seniors and ensure their essential place in community life.
Income Levels
Another strong indicator of transit dependency is income, as low‐income households are less able to purchase and maintain automobiles. A more specific measure of transit need is the population with income below the poverty level. A high poverty rate translates into an increased need for various services, to include transportation. Annual per capita income in Monroe County is $29,053 with 13.2 percent of the population living below the poverty level according to the U.S. Census Bureau. Additionally, 10.9 percent of residents who are age 65 years and older who fall below the poverty level. National studies of public transit most often reflect that low-to-moderate income workers are most likely to use public transit where the service is available. With fuel prices changing in an unpredictable manner, it is possible that demand for public transit could increase across additional income levels.
Commuting Patterns
Commuting patterns help provide a snapshot of whether a community is a “bedroom” community
for a neighboring area, whether the community is a destination for workers, or is some mix of the two options. According to the 2000 County‐to‐County Worker Flow Files produced by the United States Census Bureau, almost 31.7 percent of employed residents of Monroe County work in neighboring Macon-Bibb County, and as the table below depicts, over 60 percent of eligible workers leave Monroe County for employment purposes. By contrast, almost 40 percent of persons working in Monroe County live in Monroe County.
8
Located between larger urban centers (Macon-Bibb – 15 miles to the south and Atlanta ‐50 miles to the north), Monroe County has become a popular locale for those who have made the decision to commute to their places of employment. While Monroe County doesn’t have as many employment
options as Macon-Bibb or Atlanta, the fact does remain that some individuals might prefer the more rural lifestyle when compared to the neighboring urban centers of Macon-Bibb and metro Atlanta. The quality of life that these individuals are pursuing results in their choosing to live in Monroe County and work in other locations, thus earning Monroe County the designation as a “bedroom
community.”
County as Place of Residence
Resident Workers
Worked IN County of Residence
Worked OUT of County of Residence
Age 16+ # %
# In State # Out of State
Total %
Baldwin 16073 12055 75 3848 170 25
Crawford 4984 1129 22.7 3833 22 77.3
Houston 63348 49129 77.6 13746 473 22.4
Jones 11766 2984 25.4 8727 55 74.6
Macon-Bibb 57979 48962 84.4 8585 432 15.6
Monroe 10534 3932 37.3 6501 101 62.7
Peach 11292 4571 40.5 6589 132 59.5
Pulaski 4096 2468 60.3 1602 26 39.7
Putnam 8780 4429 50.4 4182 169 49.6
Twiggs 2501 389 15.6 2106 6 84.4
Wilkinson 3114 1543 49.6 1562 9 50.4
9
Persons with Disabilities
Those individuals with disabilities typically rely on public transit since their disabilities deny them of their ability to operate an automobile or limit their capacity to do so. In addition, many individuals with disabilities require transit vehicles with specialized equipment and many require “door‐to‐door” service with special assistance. Under the
provisions of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), transportation accommodations are defined with regards to accessibility. Public transportation may not discriminate against people with disabilities, such that a
good faith effort must be made to provide accessible transit.
The goal of any transportation system is to provide the mobility options that meet the travel needs of all community members, including those with disabilities. According to the 2017 Georgia County
Guide, there are 1,310 persons aged five and older with a disability in Monroe County, with the highest percentage (66.6%) being in the 18-64 years or older range. The second highest percentage (18.5%) falls in the 65 and older age bracket. A significant percentage of disabled persons within a particular age bracket potentially indicates an increased need in services for those persons. For example, the large percentage of disabled persons that are aged 65 years and older may require additional care facilities, as well as specialized transportation needs.
Special Populations
The Georgia Public Safety Training Center (GPSTC), located in Monroe County just outside of the city limits of Forsyth, is a regionally significant public safety facility. The GPSTC is a comprehensive training complex for use by all state and local public safety related units of government within the State of Georgia. The Training Center is made up of 16 major components including academic and administrative facilities, library and media production facilities, physical and aquatic training facilities, firefighter training facilities, correctional training facilities, driver training and firearms facilities, practical exercise village, hazardous materials and explosive devices training area and complete maintenance, cafeteria, dormitory and conference facilities.
The Training Center is designed to service an average daily student population of 500. The following agencies and/or training units are permanently housed at the Training Center: Georgia Corrections Academy, the training units of the Georgia State Patrol, Georgia Bureau of Investigation, Department of Natural Resources, State Board of Pardons and Parole, the Department Public Safety Motor Carrier Compliance Division, the Department of Juvenile Justice, and the Georgia Emergency Management Agency. In addition, the Georgia Firefighter Standards & Training Council is located onsite.
10
The Training Center is responsible for the coordination of the delivery of training to all state public safety officers, job specific training programs for state agencies, advanced and specialized training for both state and local peace officers, chief executive training and supervisory and management training. Correctional officer training, both basic and advanced, and other correctional related subjects are provided through the Georgia Department of Corrections Training Academy. The Training Center is responsive to the training needs of all fire and safety related services through the auspices of the Georgia Fire Academy. The significant daily student population at this facility makes up a unique population within the community and presents the community with additional transportation‐related challenges.
Summary
A number of factors are considered when seeking to identify a community’s transit dependent
population. Family income, disabled and elderly population, and location and access to employment opportunities are some of the more critical. Countywide, approximately 35 percent of the county’s
population meets the criteria to be considered transit dependent. This includes the elderly population, low-income residents, and disabled, working adults. A steadily growing population, along with a corresponding growth in the senior population, many of which have disabilities, home to the state’s Public Safety Training Center, and a considerable low‐income population segment all place a
demand on existing community infrastructure and services. The need for a significant portion of the population to commute outside the county for employment also illustrates a corresponding need for public transit services. Analysis of demographic data indicates that Monroe County is faced with many of the variables that would suggest the need for immediate and future transit planning.
11
EVALUATION of EXISTING SERVICES
Monroe County currently operates its transit services under a Coordinated Transportation System. This is defined as a system that combines all relevant personal transit needs in the county under a single transportation provider who has direct operating control. This Coordinated Transportation System is designed to work with the various human service agencies in Monroe County to provide transportation to its clients, as well as those citizens without a means of transportation.
Department of Human Services (DHS)
Recognizing the importance of transportation in linking people with services and opportunities, the Department of Human Services (DHS) developed a statewide transportation system to meet the specialized transportation needs of its clients who are elderly, mentally and physically disabled and/or low‐income. The goal is to provide safe, efficient and cost‐effective transportation for these
clients, allowing them access to essential services provided by the department.
The DHS coordinated transportation system provides contracted services and oversight statewide. Transportation services are provided to clients served by the Division of Aging Services (DAS), Division of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD), Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS), and the Division of Public Health (DPH). The system also provides transportation services to clients of the Department of Labor’s Vocational Rehabilitation Services Program
(DOL/VRS).
The Georgia Department of Human Services contracts with the Middle Georgia Regional Commission (MGRC) to administer the DHS Coordinated Transportation Program in the 11-county region, including Monroe County. The MGRC subcontracts with the Middle Georgia Community Action Agency, Inc. (MGCAA) to provide transportation services for Monroe County residents that are clients of the following human service agencies or programs: Monroe County Senior Center; Monroe County Department of Family and Children Services; Monroe County Developmental Disabilities Center (RiverEdge) and, the Department of Labor Vocational Rehabilitation Program‐Macon Hub.
Coordinated Transportation is an essential service in Monroe County in that it allows for greater access to human services for the elderly, the disabled, and those with limited transportation options. Eligibility criteria and essential trip priorities are provided below for each DHS Division and for other programs served by Coordinated Transportation in Monroe County:
12
Division of Aging Services (DAS) • Trips to and from Senior Centers • Trips to and from medical appointments • Trips for shopping • Trips to and from work/employment • Field trips • Trips to pay bills
Division of Family and Children Services (DFCS) • Trips in support of Temporary Assistance to Needy Families (TANF) recipients (employment,
job training, job search, etc.) • Trips to and from technical schools and adult education • Trips to and from work experience sites for food stamp recipients • Trips to and from medical appointments • Trips to and from mental health centers • Other non‐TANF trips • Trips to and from substance abuse treatment • Trips for social services • Miscellaneous trips
Division of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities (DBHDD) • Trips to and from employment locations • Trips to and from day centers • Trips to and from mental health appointments • Trips to and from community training and integration activities • Trips to and from job training • Trips to and from medical appointments • Trips for social services • Miscellaneous trips
Division of Public Health (DPH) • Trips for immunizations • Trips to and from Public Health Clinic and to and from stores • Trips for prenatal visits to clinics and other prenatal appointments • Trips to scheduled medical appointments
13
DHS seeks to provide the maximum amount of essential transportation services that can be accomplished with available resources. A priority listing of essential trips is established for each Division based on statewide input channeled through annual needs assessments. Transportation funding is committed to transit services for the highest priorities first. As funding increases or decreases, priority lists shift as to which essential trips will be performed. Eligibility criteria vary between the divisions within DHS. Information regarding eligibility determination, trip order process, etc. can be obtained by contacting the specific division/agency.
The biggest issue facing the DHS Coordinated Transportation Program is that the cost to provide the service has increased over the last several years, while the funding for the program has remained constant or for some areas has been cut, thus making it very difficult to maintain the level of service to the DHS clients and for the transportation operators (who are few in number) to stay financially solvent.
Public Transportation
Currently, there is no public transportation available in Monroe County. The county is eligible for funding under the Federal Transit Administration’s Section 5311 program but has elected not to apply. Section 5311 is the name of the federal funding program administered by the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) to provide assistance for rural public transportation. Federal funds are allocated to the states on a formula basis, and can be used for capital assistance, operating assistance, planning, and program administration. The Georgia Department of Transportation (GDOT) is responsible for administering the program. The Section 5311 Program has had a significant influence on mobility in rural communities throughout the country.
Private Transit Service
Currently, there are no private transportation providers located within Monroe County; however, several private taxi companies based in Macon-Bibb provide service to Monroe County. While these private companies provide a needed service to the community, they are not typically viewed as a viable means of transportation for most consumers. The rates charged are often cost prohibitive for daily or extended use. At least one local resident attempted to start a private transit company in 2016, but due to limited routes and lack of ridership the service was discontinued after a little under a year.
14
DEMAND ESTIMATION and TRANSIT NEEDS ASSESSMENT
Demand Estimation
Under DHS’s Coordinated Transportation system, transportation services are made available twenty‐
24 hours per day, 7 days per week. Core hours are between the hours of 6:00 am and 6:00 pm, Monday through Friday; however, the contractor must provide scheduled trips beyond these core hours and days when demand warrants.
Historical data from DHS’s Coordinated Transportation Service was utilized as a baseline to help
estimate potential future demand. The table that follows reflects trip demand reported for fiscal year 2017 (July 2016‐June 2017).
Human Service Agency Total Trips – FY17
Monroe County Senior Center 4,524 Monroe County DFCS 639 Monroe County DD Center 8,874
A total of 14,037 one‐way trips were provided by Middle Georgia Community Action Agency for DHS clients in FY2017. Just under two-thirds of the total trips were for clients of the Monroe County Developmental Disabilities Center, with the remainder of trips predominantly generated by the Monroe County Senior Center. Total FY2017 expenditures for the DHS Coordinated Transportation Program in Monroe County were $184,396.50 for an average cost of $13.14 per one‐way trip.
Ridership for DHS transportation has declined over the past five years. This is primarily attributed to a decrease in trips undertaken by Monroe County DFCS and no trips generated by the GDOL Vocational Rehab Program. Input received from the identified human service providers, the Middle Georgia CAA (transportation provider) and local officials, indicates that services are being provided across the county, geographically covering the entire population. Future level of demand is expected to remain relatively consistent, but some human service providers are expecting a potential increase in future demand due to an increase in the aging population within the community. It is hoped that some of the transit alternatives and recommendations reflected elsewhere in this plan will help to address the future transit demands within Monroe County.
15
Transit Needs Assessment
As noted previously, demographic information, such as population density, concentrations of disabled and elderly populations, poverty status and household income were analyzed to identify current and possible future transit needs in Monroe County.
An additional element of the transit needs assessment was an evaluation of possible trip destinations and/or routes that would help address those needs. This evaluation included identification of major employers, shopping centers, schools, and medical facilities. Most of the larger employers, as well as schools and medical facilities, are located in or near the City of Forsyth. According to the Georgia Department of Labor, some of the larger employers in Monroe County include Georgia Power Company, Georgia Department of Corrections, Bolingreen Health and Rehabilitation, Wal‐Mart and
Ingles Market, Inc.
There are no large‐scale shopping/retail centers in Monroe County, the City of Forsyth nor the City of Culloden; however, supermarkets, department stores and other smaller retail services can be found scattered throughout the county. Additionally, there are an abundance of eating establishments and hotels/motels located at the I‐75 interchanges in the City of Forsyth.
Land Use
Analysis of existing and future land use documents are another element of the transit needs assessment. Land use is often an important determinant of travel and potential transit markets, generally providing the location of land uses associated with different types of trips (e.g. office and industrial centers for work trips, commercial areas for shopping and institutional for education and/or medical related trips). An examination of land use maps also helps illustrate concentrations of land uses within specific areas or along corridors which can help to identify potential transit service areas.
A review of the existing land use and future development maps for Monroe County (see Appendix B) shows the vast majority of commercial, industrial and public/institutional uses projected in and around the City of Forsyth, as well as significant residential and commercial development in the southern and northern portions of the county. The county and both cities also project commercial, industrial and public/institutional uses along several major highway corridors (i.e. I‐75, SR 42, SR 18,
US 41 and US 341/SR 7).
Monroe County officials are uncertain as to the possible transit needs that may eventually be required as a result of the burgeoning growth within the county. There is almost unanimous agreement among community leaders that these issues need to be closely monitored to determine if a need develops for public transit services.
16
Community officials also recognize that a transit program can provide needed mobility to residents of the City of Forsyth and Monroe County that have limited income, limited automobile availability or physical disabilities. In addition, the number of elderly in the City of Forsyth and Monroe County is projected to increase significantly over the planning period. This age group will likely require some mobility/transit assistance.
17
GOALS and OBJECTIVES
Goals and objectives are an integral part of any transportation plan because they provide a strategic framework to achieve the community’s vision for the future. Monroe County has identified the following goals and corresponding objectives based on an assessment of existing conditions, feedback received during the community involvement process, and a review of local planning documents.
Goal: To ensure safe, reliable and sufficient transit opportunities are available to the eligible citizens of Monroe County under the DHS Coordinated Transportation System.
Objectives: • Ensure the long‐term viability of the existing DHS Coordinated Transportation System. • Support increased funding and expansion of the existing DHS
Coordinated Transportation System. • Conduct community transit forums to facilitate open discussion and information sharing, as
well as to obtain reactions to the Monroe County TDP analysis and recommendations. • Identify areas and/or population groups with an above-average propensity to need and use
transit services. • Build meaningful community partnerships. • Ensure consistency with local and regional plans. • Support regional transportation opportunities.
Goal: Promote walking and/or bicycling as viable modes of transportation.
Objectives: • Pursue school system involvement ‐examine “Safe Routes to School” programs for possible
implementation within the City of Forsyth. • Develop and implement a public education and awareness program (school-based programs,
parent education programs, government staff training, public service announcements, etc.). • Consider developing and adopting bicycle/pedestrian related
ordinances and policies. • Ensure future sidewalk construction and connectivity is addressed in all community planning
documents. • Encourage and promote healthier lifestyles through walking and bicycling. • Improve air quality by reducing traffic congestion by using alternative modes of
transportation (e.g. vanpooling, ride‐share, and bicycling).
18
TRANSIT ALTERNATIVES and RECOMMENDATIONS
Ride Share
Opportunities may exist for establishing Ride Share or organized carpooling programs in Monroe County. This consists of designating one or more areas, typically located near population centers (Forsyth) and/or major highway corridors, where individuals can park their vehicles and then arrange to share a ride or carpool to a common location (Georgia Public Safety Training Center, Georgia Department of Corrections, Monroe County Hospital, or large employers in neighboring Macon-Bibb County, e.g. GEICO, Medical Center Navicent Health, etc.). Monroe County should seek to accomplish a commuter study/survey and to benchmark other communities where Ride Share systems are currently being utilized for possible local application.
Bicycle/Pedestrian
Bisected by I‐75, and situated between Atlanta and Macon-Bibb, Monroe County is becoming one of the fastest growing counties in Georgia. Aiding in this growth is the relocation of the Georgia Department of Corrections headquarters to the City of Forsyth and the multiple suburban residential housing developments which are beginning to overtake the High Falls and Bolingbroke areas of the county. Faced with such rapid development, the community is aware of the need to focus on bicycle and pedestrian facilities to help reduce vehicular congestion and to maintain quality‐of‐life. Bicycle
and pedestrian facilities have the potential to be an important mode of transportation in and around the Cities of Forsyth and Culloden, and in many unincorporated areas of Monroe County, such as Bolingbroke, Juliette and High Falls.
The City of Forsyth is proud of its well maintained and strategically connected sidewalk system. Local officials are equally pleased with the many recent efforts to improve the streetscape design in and around the Courthouse Square. However, city officials and other community leaders recognize that pedestrian planning is an on‐going endeavor needed to ensure that Forsyth remains today, and in the future, a
pedestrian‐friendly community. The city has developed a number of plans and studies focused on pedestrian and bicyclist movement and safety. All of the planning documents actively promote bicycling and walking as mobility options as well as identify a variety of action items for the city to undertake to enhance and develop local bicycle and pedestrian resources. The city has begun the process of utilizing these plans through upgrades in sidewalks and streetscape throughout downtown. The City of Culloden has also indicated a strong desire to upgrade its pedestrian amenities, particularly in the downtown area. City officials have also expressed an interest in possibly utilizing the former Norfolk‐Southern railroad bed to establish a Rails‐to‐Trails bicycle and pedestrian facility.
19
Expansion of Existing Programs
DHS Coordinated Transportation ‐The Georgia Department of Transportation, in conjunction with the Georgia Department of Human Services, is currently developing a statewide Coordinated Human Services Transportation (HST) Plan, as well as preparing an assessment for each DHS region. The overall goal of the human services coordinated planning process is to identify the need for and gaps in transportation services, and to recommend strategies/projects to address the need. Monroe County intends to consider any and all recommendations of the finalized DHS Region 6 Assessment and the statewide HST Plan for possible local application.
Limited Fixed Route Transit Service
Community planners considered the potential need and demand for fixed route service in the county. Extensive fixed route service is usually not practical or cost effective in an area with population densities as low, and development as dispersed, as much of Monroe County is. However, this sort of service may well be effective in providing connections to employment, retail, and service centers outside of the county, to locations such as Macon-Bibb County. The level of resources needed to provide these connections will vary widely depending on the frequency of service provided. Prior to implementing such a service, a comprehensive ridership survey and a cost‐benefit analysis will need
to be accomplished. Additionally, an analysis of funding options to implement such a service is an essential step in the planning process. Coordinated Transit Delivery Legislation passed in 2010 (House Bill 277) calls for the Governor’s Development Council (GDC), with
assistance from the Georgia Coordinating Committee for Rural and Human Services Transportation (RHST), to identify ways to increase the coordination of the state’s rural and human services
transportation system. The purpose of the legislation is to ensure the most cost‐effective delivery of
RHST services in Georgia, and to best serve the citizens who utilize the system. Specifically, efforts at coordination should seek to minimize areas of overlap and duplication in RHST delivery.
In 2011, as a part of this statewide initiative, the Middle Georgia Regional Commission agreed to participate in a pilot program whereby a Regional Mobility Manager is established at the Regional Commission. Primarily funded through the FTA’s Section 5316, Job Access and Reverse Commute
(JARC) program, the Regional Mobility Manager concept is designed to create economies of scale at the regional service‐delivery level, to lower administrative costs, reduce administrative burdens, eliminate duplication of services, leverage funding, and develop consistent data tracking for all transit programs. Monroe County stands to benefit from support and implementation of a Regional Mobility Manager program.
20
IMPLEMENTATION TIMELINE
Short-Range (Year 1):
• Support continued implementation of the Regional Mobility Manager program.
• Continue participation in the Middle Georgia Clean Air Coalition.
• Continue to pursue local bicycle/pedestrian initiatives.
• Conduct appropriate benchmarking concerning Ride Share options.
Mid-Range (Years 2‐3):
• Seek to quantify unmet transit needs by using a variety of survey techniques and public input
forums.
• Explore funding sources and alternatives to expand transit capabilities to satisfy any unmet
needs.
• Aggressively pursue all potential funding sources.
• Implement Ride Share program – possibly on a trial basis to determine usage and feasibility.
• Continue bicycle/pedestrian initiatives.
Long-Range (Years 4‐5):
• Implement appropriate transit alternatives to address unmet transit needs.
• Continue bicycle/pedestrian initiatives.
• Evaluate participation in regional or multi‐county transit system to better serve rural and human services transit customers.
• Develop and implement appropriate marketing tools to inform consumers of available transit services.
21
Monroe County Rural Transit Development Plan 2017-2022
APPENDIX A - Report of Accomplishments
MONROE COUNTY / CITIES of FORSYTH AND CULLODEN TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN
REPORT OF ACCOMPLISHMENTS, 2012 - 2017
Activity Status
(Complete, Underway, Postpones, Not Accomplished)
Explanation
1. Conduct appropriate benchmarking and/or feasibility study concerning Ride Share options.
Postponed Awaiting regional multicounty study.
2. Quantify unmet transit needs by using a variety of survey techniques and conducting a series of public forums.
Postponed Will be accomplished under Regional Mobility Manager program.
3. Continue bicycle/pedestrian initiatives Underway
Connectivity Study, Sidewalk Plan, and Bike-Ped Plan are currently being utilized.
4. Develop and implement appropriate marketing strategies to make consumers/residents aware of available transit services.
Underway
Directory of Services created under Regional Mobility Manager concept; education and awareness workshops to be scheduled.
5. Explore funding sources and alternatives to expand transit capabilities.
Underway County will work with Regional Mobility Manager to identify means to enhance transit services.
22
Monroe County Rural Transit Development Plan 2017-2022
APPENDIX B – Maps
Middle Georgia Service Area Map
Existing Land Use Maps
Future Development Maps
�
��
�
����������
���������
������������
��������������
���������
����������
������������
���������
������������
������������
�����������
���������
���
������
�����������
� ���
������
���������
�����
������
����� �
�����������������
��
��!��
�����
��������
������
�"�!�
���� �#
��
��!$��
%�������
����������������� �����������
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
��������������������
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
�����
������
����
����
�����
�����
���������
����
� �� �� ����
���������������������
§̈¦75
§̈¦475
£¤341
£¤41
¬«42
¬«83
¬«18
¬«74
¬«19
JOHNSTONVI LLE RD
JULI ETTE
RD
BUNN RD
PEA RIDGE RD
PATE
RD
ESTE
SRD
GOSE
RD
R UMBLE RD
BRENT RD
US HWY 23
SMITH RDED GE RD
REED
YC REEKRD
RIVOL IRD
ZEBULONRD
OLD ZE BULON RD
US HWY 87
FREE
MAN
RD
HILL
RD
GOOD W YNE RDJ OSEY RD
MONTPELI E R RD
SUTTON RD
B OXANKLERD
TEAGLE RD
JENKINS
RD
COLVINRD
ZELL
NER
RD
SPEARRD
OXFORDRD
PARK
SR D
SHI
RDLEE
KINGRD
LASSITER RD
LINDSEY
R D
HOP EWELL RD
WADLEYRDABER CROMBIE R D
GIL ES RD
TREADW ELL RD
MAYNARDMILLRD
BYARS RD
RIVER LN
THARPE
RD
Monroe County, GA:Current Land Use
LegendCommercial
Agriculture/Forestry
Industrial
Park/Recreation/Conservation
Public/institutional
Residential
Transportation/Communication/Utilities
Undeveloped/Vacant
Municipal Boundaries
Local Street
Highway
Interstate
City of Culloden, GA:Current Land Use
ROBERTA RD
COLLEGE ST
MAIN
ST
£¤341
£¤341
16
§̈¦75
£¤41
£¤41
¬«42
¬«83
¬«83¬«42
¬«18
¬«18
¬«19
BENSON HAM RD
E MAIN ST
MIZE ST
SHARP ST
JULIET
TE RDJA
MES
ST
BUNN RD
TIFT COLLEGE DR
BLOU
NT ST
IN DU STRIAL PARKDR
ENSIG
N RD
MONTPELIERRD
JONES ST
GILMORE RDINDIAN SPRINGS DR
W RAILROAD AVE
P I NE CIR
PATROL RD
CHRISW OODDR
GRANTS
TFERN
FREE
MAN AVE
MORELAND RD
W JOHNSON ST
CONIFER DR
MITC
HELL
RD THORNTON RD
WILDER DR
KYNDAL LN
MEADO W
DR
SUNSET C IR
RAILROADAVE FRONTAGE RD
JENN
IFER
DR
UNION HILL RD
COLLIER RD
KEITH DR
OLD BRENT RD
MONTPELIERAVE NEWTON DR
TODD CREEK PL
FAIR
VIEW
CHURCH RD
ENGLISH
RAMP
FERN
DR
FRONTAGE DR
MADISON LN
LAUR
ELRD
G
FRANK BUNN DR
CATER LN
HARDAGE RD
GOODWYNE RD
City of Forsyth, GA:Current Land Use
LegendCommercial
Agriculture/Forestry
Industrial
Park/Recreation/Conservation
Public/institutional
Residential
Transportation/Communication/Utilities
Undeveloped/Vacant
Municipal Boundaries
Local Street
Highway
Interstate 17
§̈¦75
§̈¦75§̈¦475
£¤341
£¤41
¬«42
¬«83
¬«18
¬«74
¬«19
JOHNSTONV ILLE RD
STOKES
STORE RD
JULI ETTE
RD
BUNN
RD
PEA RIDGE RD
PATE
RD
ESTE
SRD
GOSE
RD
RU MBLERDBRENT RD
US HWY 23
SM I THRD
ED GE RD
REED
YC REEKRD
RIVOL IRD
ZEBULONRD
OLD ZE BULON RD
USHWY 87
HILL
RD
GOOD WYNE RDJ OSE Y RD
MONTPELI E R RD
SUTTON RD
B OXANKLERD
TEAGLE RD
JENKINS
RD
COLVINRD
ZELL
NER
RD
OXFORDRD
PARK
SRD
SHI
RDLEE
KINGRD
LASSITER RD
LINDSEY
R D
HOP EWELL RD
WADLEYRDABER CROMBIE R D TREADW ELL RD
MAYNARDM
I LLRD
DAVISRD
BYARS RD
RIVER LN
THARPE
RD
City of Culloden, GA:Future Land Use
COLLEGE ST
FROG
ALL
EYMA
IN ST
£¤341
£¤341
Monroe County, GA:Future Land Use
LegendCommercial
Public / Institutional
Mixed Use
Commercial-Light
Agriculture
Industrial
Residential
Municipal Boundaries
Road CenterlinesLocal Street
Highway
Interstate19
§̈¦75£¤41
£¤41
¬«42
¬«83
¬«83¬«42
¬«18
¬«18
¬«19
BENSON HAM RD
EMAIN ST
MIZE ST
SHARP ST
JULIETTE RD
JAME
S ST
BUNN RD
TIFT COLLEGE DR
BLOU
NT ST
IN DU STRIAL PARKDR
ENSIG
N RD
OAKRID
GEDR
JONES ST
GILMORE RDINDIAN SPRINGS DR
W RAILROAD AVE
P I NE CIR
PATROL RD
CHRISW OOD DR
GRANTS
T
FREE
MAN AVEMORELAND RD
W JOHNSON ST
CONIFER DR
MAYNARDDR
MITC
HELL
RD
MONTPELIERRD
THORNTON RD
WILDER DR
KYNDAL LN
MEADO W
DR
SUNSET CI RSUNSET TERRAILROAD
AVE
FRONTAGE RD
OLD BRENT RD
UNION HILL RD
COLLIER RD
KEITH DR
MONTPELIERAVE NEWTON DR
TODD CREEK PL
CHARLES BENSON RD
RA BON DR
RAMP
FERN
DR
FRONTAGE DR
MADISON LN
LAUR
ELRD
G
FRANK BUNN DR
CATER LN
HARDAGE RD
GOODWYNE RD
LegendCommercial
Public / Institutional
Mixed Use
Commercial-Light
Agriculture
Industrial
Residential
Municipal Boundaries
Road CenterlinesLocal Street
Highway
Interstate
City of Forsyth, GA:Future Land Use
21
