40
1 The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later Session 128, February 21, 2017 Jamie Martin, Marketing & Communications, & Nadine Robin, Health IT Programs Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum

The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

1

The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year LaterSession 128, February 21, 2017

Jamie Martin, Marketing & Communications, & Nadine Robin, Health IT Programs

Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum

Page 2: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

2

Speaker Introduction

Jamie Martin, B.A.

Marketing & Communications

Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum

Add Speaker

Photo Here

Page 3: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

3

Speaker Introduction

Nadine Robin, B.A.

Health IT Programs

Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum

Page 4: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

4

Conflict of Interest

Jamie Martin, B.A., and Nadine Robin, B.A., have no real or apparent conflicts

of interest to report.

Page 5: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

5

Agenda

• Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum

• Louisiana: Complexities

• The Campaign & Year in Review

• Lessons & Feedback

• Recommendations

Page 6: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

6

Learning Objectives

• Demonstrate the results of statewide patient engagement efforts in

Louisiana and how that data was applied to drive long-term improvements in

health outcomes and healthcare decision-making at the patient level

• Discuss patient feedback, insights and challenges with regards to the

value and use of health IT

• Identify strategies through which Louisiana’s patient engagement

successes can be replicated within and across care settings, health

systems, communities and states

Page 7: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

7

HIMSS Steps

S SATISFACTION: Patients report greater satisfaction with, and

confidence in, the use of health IT to manage their health.

EELECTRONIC SECURE DATA: Patients report reduced

concerns/fears about the privacy and security of their information.

P PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: Providers report increased interest

and use of health IT among their patients.

Page 8: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

8

Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum

• Private, not-for-profit organization

established after Hurricanes Katrina and Rita

• Neutral convener of Louisiana’s healthcare

stakeholders

• State-designated entity for health IT initiatives

• EHR adoption and Meaningful Use

• Louisiana Health Information Exchange

(LaHIE)

• Patient-Centered Medical Home

• Quality Measurement & Analytics

PRO

VID

ERS PAY

ERS P

URCH

ASERS C

ONSUM

ERS

STAKEHOLDERS

Page 9: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

9

Louisiana’s Landscape

• 50th in nation in terms of health & outcomes

• 45th in nation in Emergency Department (ED) utilization

• High incidences of infectious & chronic diseases

• High prevalence of low birth weight, preventable hospitalizations & obesity

• Significant geographic variations in care that cannot be attributed to

patient demographics or payer status

Sources: Kaiser Family Foundation, Louisiana Department of Health, United Health Foundation

Page 10: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

10

Developing A Solution• Lead statewide, direct-to-patient campaign to promote health IT (2015)

• Primary objectives:

1. Increase awareness & understanding of health IT tools

2. Provide education regarding patient rights to access personal health

information, regardless of format

3. Promote messaging about how to use personal health information

to improve decision-making at the point of care and beyond

Page 11: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

11

of state residents demonstrate

lowest literacy levels (HRSA)

HEALTH LITERACY RURAL STATE

of state residents live in

rural areas (USDA)

LIMITED FUNDING

CONSUMER/PATIENT INTEREST26% 64%

Campaign Challenges

Page 12: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

12

Poll Question

What is your biggest patient engagement challenge?

A. Lack of resources/training

B. Health literacy

C. Patient interest

D. Lack of user-friendly IT

Page 13: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

13

Page 14: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

14

• Health Care Consumer Advisory Council

– Provides feedback/insights

• Target audiences were identified:

• Pre-campaign survey to identify baseline

Sandwich Generation/

CAREGIVERSWOMEN

ages 18-64

Baby

BOOMERS

Campaign Process

Page 15: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

15

CampaignMessaging

Page 16: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

16

CampaignMessaging

Page 17: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

17

Campaign Tools

• Website

• Social media (paid & organic)

• Traditional advertising

• Community-level partnerships

• Direct consumer engagement

• Media outreach

• Provider outreach

Page 18: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

18

Consumer Spokespersons

Page 19: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

19

Campaign FootprintOUTDOOR: 5.95M+ impressions/month

BROADCAST: 800K+/Month

PRINT: 175K+/month

DIGITAL/SOCIAL MEDIA: 600K+/month

MALL: 5.84M+ impressions/month

Page 20: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

20

Poll Question

How do you communicate with patients about health IT?

A. I’m using all available channels

B. I’m on social media

C. I send out newsletters/emails

D. I talk to them when they come in

Page 21: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

21

Page 22: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

22

Results

9%INCREASE

Pre-campaign

We asked: Do you have current copies of your health information?

32%

Post-campaign

41%

Page 23: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

23

Results

We asked: Have you ever requested copies of your health information?

12%INCREASE

Pre-campaign

51%

Post-campaign

63%

Page 24: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

24

Results

We asked: Have you heard of Electronic Health Records (EHRs)?

10%INCREASE

Pre-campaign

31%

Post-campaign

41%

Page 25: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

25

Results

We asked: Have you heard of Patient Portals?

51%INCREASE

27% 78%

Pre-campaign Post-campaign

Page 26: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

26

Results

26%INCREASE

We asked: Have you heard of LaHIE?

Pre-campaign Post-campaign

18% 44%

Page 27: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

27

Results

2015 2016 Total Increase

Ask doctor 42% 70% 28%

Write it down 15% 20% 5%

Patient portal 29% 52% 23%

Memorize it 13% 16% 3%

Family member 1% 3% 2%

We asked: How do you track your personal health information?

Page 28: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

28

Poll Question

What do your patients say about your patient portal?

A. They love it

B. They’d rather talk to a human

C. They would love it if they used it

D. They don’t know how to use it

Page 29: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

29

Page 30: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

30

Patient Feedback

Positive Feedback

• 66% of respondents who

have used a patient portal

reported positive experiences

The post-campaign survey provided consumers with the opportunity to share

personal feedback about their experiences using patient portals.

Negative Feedback

• 17% reported problems related to

logging in, remembering/retrieving

passwords & system errors

Page 31: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

31

What Patients Say About Portals

“I changed doctors to get

one that has a patient portal.

My child has special health needs,

and it lets me make sure

medications are correct and ask

our doctor questions.”

“I tried it once and was

told to come to the office to get

my information because it isn’t

in the portal, so what’s the use

of having the portal in the

first place?

Positive Negative

Page 32: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

32

Patient Feedback

Positive Feedback

• 13% indicated they prefer to

use their portal to communicate

with their provider

Negative Feedback

• 5% indicated dissatisfaction with

having multiple portals and passwords

• 7% indicated difficulty in navigating

their providers’ portals

• 19% reported there is no usable data

in their providers’ portals

Page 33: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

33

Positive Negative

What Patients Say About Portals

“My portal works well

for me. I carry my health records

on an app on my phone and can

show it to any doctor I see outside

of my primary care doctor.”

“I have two portals from

two different health systems.

They contain incomplete information

and aren’t linked to each other,

so I rarely use them. I want one

portal, one password and one

comprehensive medical

record.”

Page 34: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

34

What We Learned

• Patients want user-friendly technology for convenient, comprehensive,

24-hour access to their personal health information

• More than others, seniors want access to their data

• Social media is extremely effective in conveying health IT messages

• Providers are the most important messengers about the value and

benefits of health IT

• Word-of-mouth is powerful – patients talk to each other about their

health, healthcare and available resources

Page 35: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

35

Replicating Louisiana’s Campaign

• Bring patients to the table by establishing consumer advisory groups

• Identify your target audiences – know which patient populations will most

benefit from your messaging

• Integrate your strategy to include all available communication channels,

from traditional advertising to social media and beyond

• Seek out consumer spokespersons and partnerships with community-

level organizations

• Establish relationships with providers and healthcare professional

organizations to support their patient engagement efforts

Page 36: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

36

Recommendations

Communicate

RELENTLESSLY

Page 37: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

37

Recommendations

Less talk

MORE ACTION

Page 38: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

38

Recommendations

Make it

PERSONAL

Page 39: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

39

HIMSS Steps

S SATISFACTION: Patients report greater satisfaction with, and

confidence in, the use of health IT to manage their health.

E ELECTRONIC SECURE DATA: Patients report reduced

concerns/fears about the privacy and security of their information.

P PATIENT ENGAGEMENT: Providers report increased interest

and use of health IT among their patients.

Page 40: The Patient Perspective on Patient Engagement: One Year Later

40

Questions?

Louisiana Health Care Quality Forum

8550 United Plaza Blvd.

Baton Rouge, LA 70809

(225) 334-9299

[email protected]

@LHCQF1

Jamie Martin

[email protected]

@DavisJamie77

Nadine Robin

[email protected]

@HITNadine