5
THE PARAYA SYRIAN CHRISTIANS OF KERALA Pope denies St. Thomas came to South India

THE PARAYA SYRIAN CHRISTIANS OF KERALA

  • Upload
    fredy

  • View
    700

  • Download
    3

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

THE PRESENT NAZI POPE SAYS THAT ST THOMAS NEVER CAME TO KERALA. THIS HAS EXPOSED THE CHRISTIAN FRAUD OF KERALA SYRIAN CHRISTIANS. KERALA CHRISTIANS ARE ACTUALLY THE PARAYA COMMUNITY CONVERTS AND LOOKS LIKE AK ANTHONY. TO IMPROVE THEIR SOCIAL STANDING THESE KERALA PARAYA CHRISTIANS MOVED TO CHENNAI AND CREATED THE FAKE STORY OF ST THOMAS VISIT AND HIS CONVERSION OF HINDUS TO CHRISTIANITY..THE WHOLE CHRISTIAN RELIGION WAS STARTED ONLY IN THE FOURTH CENTURY BY KING CONSTANTAIN

Citation preview

Page 1: THE PARAYA SYRIAN CHRISTIANS OF KERALA

THE PARAYA SYRIAN CHRISTIANS OF KERALA

Pope denies St. Thomas came to South India

Page 2: THE PARAYA SYRIAN CHRISTIANS OF KERALA
Page 3: THE PARAYA SYRIAN CHRISTIANS OF KERALA

St Thomas Controversy is raging in the Christian community in Kerala following recent remarks by Pope Benedict XVI that St. Thomas had preached Christianity in “western” India, from where it spread to other parts of the country, fuelling a debate whether or not the apostle had come to southern India.

The community in Kerala believes that St. Thomas came to this part of the country in A.D. 52 and had established seven churches. The community considers St. Thomas as the “Father in Faith” of Christians in India.

The present Pope had in a recent pronouncement at St. Peter's Square at the Vatican spoken of St. Thomas the Apostle, seemingly taking away from him the traditional title of “Apostle of India”.

Page 4: THE PARAYA SYRIAN CHRISTIANS OF KERALA

Though the Pope did not actually use the expression “apostle of Pakistan”, what he said might seem to imply it, says an article by George Nedungatt, a faculty member of the Oriental Pontifical Institute, Rome, in Satya Deepam, a mouthpiece of the Syro-Malabar church.

The article says the Pope's predecessors had on several occasions referred to St. Thomas as the “Apostle of India”. However, differing from this view, Pope Benedict feels the area St. Thomas evangelised was not South India, but what he called “western India”, corresponding roughly to today's Pakistan, says the article.

The Pope, addressing a vast crowd at St. Peter's Square, had said: “ ... Thomas first evangelised Syria and Persia and then penetrated as far as western India, from where Christianity reached also South India”.

According to the Pope, while northwestern India was evangelised by St. Thomas, South India was not evangelised by him. He does not specify who first preached the Gospel in South India: whether some disciple or disciples of the Apostle himself or others in the post-apostolic age or later, the article says. As the Pope sees it, South India was not evangelised by St. Thomas, but by Christians coming from northwestern India, seemingly at a later period.

“The Thomas Christians of South India, both Catholic and others, are not likely to be thankful for his papal statement. This is a clear departure from the pronouncements of his predecessors,” the article says.

Church sources say there is scholarly debate on the evidence on whether St. Thomas came to India and Kerala. Historical proofs are from the Gospel of St. Thomas and Act of Thomas, the sources said.

From these there (is) evidence that St. Thomas came to India. But it is not clear whether he had come to western India or southern India, the sources said.

Page 5: THE PARAYA SYRIAN CHRISTIANS OF KERALA

In Chennai, meanwhile, Rev. Lawrence Pius Dorairaj, Bishop of Santhome Basilica Cathedral, which is built over the tomb of the apostle, said the controversy sparked by the Pope's remarks was nothing new. “Going by reports in a mouthpiece of the Syro-Malabar Church, the sentiments of the St. Thomas Christians have definitely been hurt,” he said.

NOTE: This article originally appeared in The Deccan Chronicle, Chennai, of 23 November 2006, under the title "Pope angers Christians in Kerala".