View
222
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Outer Evolution of Wind Structure
Stan Owocki, Bartol/UDel
Mark Runacres, Royal Obs./Brussels
David Cohen, Bartol/UDel
Outline
• Line-Driven Instability of Inner Wind Acceleration
• Direct extension to ~40 R*
• Quasi-Periodic Models to ~150 R*
• Pseudo-Planar Simulation to >1000 R*
• Main Result: Energy Balance Crucial
Oral Presentation at workshop on: “Thermal & IonizationAspects of Flows from Hot Stars”, Tartu, Estonia, Aug. 1999
0.0 0.5 1.0
0
500
1000
1500
Clumped density
-15
-14
-13
-12
-11
-10
CAK
log
Den
sity
(g/
cm3 )
Height (R*)
Self-Excitation of Line-Driven Instability in Wind Acceleration Region
no base perturbation
t=430 ksec
t=430 ksec
Tim
e (k
sec)
0 10 20 30 40
430
450
470
490
Height (R*)
log Density (g/cm3)
400 10 20 30
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
430
450
470
490
Tim
e (k
sec)
0 10 20 30 40
Height (R*)
Velocity (km/s)
0 10 20 30 40
0
1000
2000
3000
Extended Evolution to r~ 41 R*
log Density (g/cm3)
125 100 75
-22
-20
-18
-16
-14
-12
-10
t=430 ksec
m(r,t)125 100 75
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
Tim
e (k
sec) r=
R*Velocity (km/s)
m(r,t)
125 100 75
0
1000
2000
3000
125 100 75
490
480
470
460
450
440
430
r=R
*
r=41
R*
t=430 ksec
Extended Evolution vs. Lagrangian MassT
ime
(kse
c)
r=41
R*
Statistical Properties of Wind Structure
Sqrt(Clumping factor)
0 10 20 30 401
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
Height (R*)0 10 20 30 40
-1
0
1
-1
0
1
Height (R*)
Vel.-Den. Correlation
10 20 30 400
100
200
300
400
Height (R*)
RMS Vel.
0 10 20 30 400
1
2
0
1
2
Height(R*)
RMS log(Den.)
v (
km
/s)
C f ¥≠Ω2Æ
hΩi2
Quasi-Periodic Extension to r~165 R*
Height
Repeat structure at r=41 R*
50 100 1500-22
-20
-18
-16
-22
-20
-18
-16
log Density (g/cm3)
-22
-20
-18
-16
Tim
e
10 * Po
11 * Po
log Density
over
Quasi-Period
Po = 216 ~ 65 ksec
50 100 150
01
2
3
4
5
1
2
3
4
5
50 100 150
Sqrt[Cf]
0
• Spherical Conservation Equations reduce to:
• Mass
• Momentum
• Energy
Pseudo-Planar Equations
• Galilean transformation
• Rescaled variables
only non-planar terms needed to account for
sphericity
positionvelocity
density
pressure
internal energy
~Ω ¥ Ω(r=R)2
~P ¥ P(r=R)2
~E ¥ E(r=R)2
@~Ω@t
+@(~Ωw)
@x= 0
@(~Ωw)@t
+@(~Ωw2)
@x= °
@~P@x
+2~Pr
@~E@t
+@(~Ew)
@x= ° ~P
@w@x
°2~P(Vo +w)
r
x ¥ r ° R ° Vot
w ¥ v ° Vo
adiabaticcooling
Pseudo-planar evolution
Adiabatic evolutionof Periodic pulse
Quasi-Periodic pulse train :
Adiabatic cooling allows structure to persist
0
Tim
e (M
sec)
12
Density
0 x (R*) 30
Density snapshots
0 Radius (R*) 30
0 x (R*) 3
0
Tim
e (M
sec)
12
Density
t ~ 4 months
r ~ 2000 R*
• for r > few R*, decline of radiative driving
• for r >~ 10 R*, pressure expansion
• but also photoionization heating & line cooling
• by gas law:
• with net result
Dissipation of Structure
• So Energy balance key: need T > 0
• Two possibilities:
• suppress heating => cold clumps: Tcold << T*
• suppress cooling => hot X-ray em: Thot >> T*
0
T 0
P 0
v 0
¢ΩΩ=¢PP°¢TT
X-rays from Hot +Warm Wind• Observe : Lx ~ 10-7 Lbol .
• by scaling analysis (Owocki & Cohen 1999) :
Lx ~ Cs2 fv (M/v
• where :
Cs= hot/<fv = Volume filling fraction hot gas
Cs fv = fm = Mass filling fraction
• for : Lx / Lbol ~ 10-7 & Thot ~ 5 MK
• need : Cs2 fv ~ 0.01
• for P=0 : fv ~ 0.9 ; Cs ~ 0.1 => fm ~ 0.1
lower reduces line cooling
Summary
• Line-driven instability => structure within few R*
• But by few 10 R* : v , P , T , 0
• Energy balance is key to extended structure• reduce photoionization heating: cold clumps• reduce line-cooling: hot gas + X-rays
• Pseudo-Planar approach allows:• modelling of quasi-periodic structure• extension to r > 1000 R* , perhaps to pc
• Future work• instability models as input to pseudo-planar• improved photoionization heating & line cooling• 2D & 3D models in periodic box•Application to:
• X-ray• thermal & non-thermal radio• nebulae structure
Clumping factor
0 20 40 60 80 1000
20
40
60
80
100
2
3
5
4
1/(1-fv)
hi---lo
*
hi/lo=Thot / Twarm =100
1-fv=0.1Cf
1/2 = 2.9
Sqrt[Cf]
For hot + warm wind model: