The on-line HFA Monitor and national level process

2nd ISDR Asia Pacific Partnership Meeting11- 13 August , 2010

Incheon, Republic of Korea

HFA Monitor

• A web based monitoring system

• Hosted at

http://www.preventionweb.net/english/hyogo/hfa-monitoring/

• Primary target user: National government

Outline

• Walkthrough of ‘HFA Monitor’ tool

• National level implementation process and time frame

HFA Monitor• 3 strategic goals

• 22 core indicators in 5 priorities for action

• 5 drivers of progress

• 3 future outlook statements

• 5 levels of progress from minor progress to comprehensive achivement

: Regional organizations

(2009-11)

View interim report

View report

View report

Access to authorized regional organizations

View interim report

View interim report

Accessibility of country reports

Demo user account

• User id: hfamonitordemo2010

• Password:

demo2010

National level arrangements

• Nominated HFA focal point facilitates inputs to online ‘HFA Monitor’

• Broad, inclusive consultation across government and other stakeholders

• Draw on existing monitoring and review process (if available)

• Includes analysis of DRR progress reported in other frameworks (CCA, NAPA, MDG etc.)

• Supportive of national processes and feeds into national level DRR planning

Suggested stepsPhase I By 30 September 2010

Step 1: Identification of relevant stake holders

Step 2: Grouping of stakeholders

Step 3: Carry out multi stakeholder meetings/ workshops

Step 4: Assemble all inputs from the working groups

Step 5: Input all validated information in the web based HFA monitor system

Step 6: Circulate the interim report to the working groups

Step 7: Share the information as an ‘Interim’ report

Phase II

Step 8: Continue improving the information on the report

Step 9: Finalize the report with the stakeholder group

Step 10: Share the 2009- 2011 ‘Final Report’ through the HFA monitor

Multi stakeholder approachExamples of key stake holders

Identification of relevant stake holders

• Relevance, interest and availability

• Representation from a wide variety of stakeholders is essential

• Stakeholder mapping

Grouping of stakeholders• Form working groups on specific areas

For example: for each priority area of the HFA

• Multi stakeholder representation in each working group

• Identify facilitating organisation in each group

Multi stakeholder meetings

• Each working group meets to gather and analyze available information

• May use the offline report template

• Gather information through desk researches, field surveys and interviews

Assemble all inputs

• Through multi stakeholder participatory meetings

• Deliberate on the over all progress in all areas of HFA

• Coverage and authenticity is key

Input in HFA Monitor

• Feed information in the online tool

• After completion validate the report by the working groups

• Share it as an ‘Interim’ report

By 30 September 2010

Finalize report

• Continue updating the information

• Finalize with the stake holder group

• Share as a ‘Final Report’

By May 2011

Discussion points

• Clarifications on the HFA Monitor tool

• Clarifications and/or suggestions on the national level processes