1
The new PNPR algorithm for the cross-track scanning radiometer ATMS: description and verification study over Europe and Africa using GPM and TRMM spaceborne radars P. Sanò, D. Casella, G. Panegrossi, A. C. Marra, S. Dietrich CNR/ISAC Istituto di Scienze dell'Atmosfera e del Clima PNPR v2 for the cross-track scanning ATMS radiometer Verification study over Europe and Africa using TRMM-PR/GPM-Ku-PR This research was supported by EUMETSAT through the "Satellite Application Facility on Support to Operational Hydrology and Water Management" (H-SAF), by the Earth2Observe FP7 EU funded project, by the Italian Civil Protection Department. Acknowledgments Casella, D., et al.: A novel algorithm for detection of precipitation in tropical regions using PMW radiometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1217-1232, doi:10.5194/amt-8- 1217-2015, 2015. Casella, D., et al.: Transitioning from CRD to CDRD in Bayesian retrieval of rainfall from satellite passive microwave measurements, Part 2: Overcoming database profile selection ambiguity by consideration of meteorological control on microphysics, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens, vol.51, no.9, 4650-4671, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2258161, 2013. Casella, D., et al.: Verification of Cloud Dynamics and Radiation Database (CDRD) passive microwave precipitation retrieval algorithm using TRMM satellite radar and radiometer measurements over southern Mediterranean basin, in: IEEE Proc. MicroRad 2012, 12th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment, Rome, Italy, 5-9 March 2012, 4 pp., 2012. Mugnai, A., et al.: Precipitation products from the Hydrology SAF, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1959-1981, doi:10.5194/nhess-13-1959-2013, 2013. Panegrossi et al., A verification study over Europe of AMSU-A/MHS and SSMIS passive microwave precipitation retrievals, Proc. 2013 EUMETSAT/AMS Meteorol. Sat. Conference, Vienna, Sept. 2013, https://www.eumetsat.int/website/home/News/ConferencesandEvents/PreviousEve nts/DAT_2027670.html Panegrossi G., et al.: CDRD and PNPR passive microwave precipitation retrieval algorithms: extension to the MSG full disk area, Proc. 2014 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference, Geneva, Sept. 2014, https://www.eumetsat.int/website/home/News/ConferencesandEvents/DAT_2076 129.html Sanò, P., et al.: Transitioning from CRD to CDRD in Bayesian retrieval of rainfall from satellite passive microwave measurements, Part 1: Algorithm description and testing, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., Vol. 51, no. 7, 4119-4143, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227332, 2013 Sanò, P., et al.: The Passive microwave Neural network Precipitation Retrieval (PNPR) algorithm for AMSU/MHS observations: description and application to European case studies, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 837-857, doi:10.5194/amt- 8-837-2015, 2015. Sanò, P., et al.: The new Passive microwave Neural network Precipitation Retrieval (PNPR) algorithm for the cross-track scanning ATMS radiometer: description and verification study over Europe and Africa using GPM and TRMM spaceborne radars, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., doi:10.5194/amt- 2016-199, 2016. References Contingency table of rain rate values obtained from PNPR v2 and the GPM- Ku and TRMM-PR radar measurements over both European and African areas. The percentages shown in a given column represent how the PNPR v2 product classifies the precipitation assigned to that class by the radar. There is an appreciable general consistency between the PNPR v2 and the radar measurements, as shown by the values in the cells of the main diagonal of each type of surface background. This study describes the design of a new algorithm, PNPR v2, for estimation of precipitation on the ground for the cross-track ATMS radiometer, and presents the results of a verification study where the instantaneous precipitation rate estimates available from TRMM and GPM spaceborne radars are used as reference. PNPR v2 has been designed for retrieval of precipitation in the MSG full disk area. The algorithm, based on a neural network approach, represents an evolution of the previous version PNPR v1, designed for the AMSU/MHS radiometer, with some changes made to take advantage of the improvements of ATMS with respect to AMSU/MHS. The verification study carried out through a comparison with co-located observations of ATMS with the NASA/JAXA TRMM-PR and GPM-KuPR spaceborne radars showed a substantial agreement of PNPR v2 with the precipitation products available from the two radars. The systematic errors are small with a relatively high correlation. The performance varies slightly with the surface background (vegetated land, arid land, coast, ocean) and with the geographical areas (Europe and Africa). The results, however, have revealed a slight tendency of PNPR v2 to overestimate moderate to light precipitation over the ocean, especially compared to GPM-KuPR. In the comparison of PNPR v2 and PNPR v1 retrievals, over the African area and based on two years period of coincident observations of ATMS and AMSU/MHS radiometers with TRMM-PR, an appreciably better performance of PNPR v2 has been evidenced by the statistical indexes (RMSE and BIAS values are reduced over all background surfaces), and especially by a great general improvement of the low precipitation estimation, mostly over ocean (both in terms of Relative Bias % and Adjusted FSE%). Conclusions Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder Outputs PNPR algorithm for AMSU/MHS radiometers (HSAF-H02 A/B) One ANN for all surface backgrounds; The Full Disk Algorithm uses two ANNs (ANN-A for European Area, ANN-B for African Area) Inputs: AMSU-A/MHS channels (50.2, 89, 157, 183±1., 183±3, 183±7 GHz ) and geographycal/meteorological parameters. Precipitation phase and Quality index evaluation Main differences of PNPR-ATMS (HSAF-H18) with respect to PNPR-AMSU/MHS: New fully redesigned single ANN trained using both the European/African databases. The exploitation of two new ATMS channels: Combined use of the 183±1.8 and 183±4.5 GHz channels. The use of monthly mean Total Precipitable Water to drive ANN in the transition between tropical and mid-latitude climatic conditions. PMW Neural-net Precipitation Retrieval (PNPR) Algorithms for cross-track scanners (AMSU-A/MHS and ATMS) ATMS is cross-track scanning microwave radiometer on board the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (NPP) satellite. Compared with AMSU and MHS, ATMS has improved resolution and sampling and a wider swath to reduces the orbital gaps . Three new channels are added : channel 4 (51.76 GHz) for lower tropospheric temperature sounding and the two channels 19 and 21 (183.31±4.5 GHz and 183.31±1.8 GHz) to enhance the water vapour profiling performance. We only compared the pixels where the precipitations from both radiometer and radar data were greater than 0 mm h -1 (hits). For the evaluation of statistical indexes for a given geographical location all coincident estimates of ATMS and TRMM-PR or GPM- Ku, corresponding to that position, were considered regardless of the time of overpasses. The statistical indexes were evaluated without making a distinction between solid and liquid precipitation, thus including pixels with snow or ice on the ground. Geographical distribution of Bias, RMSE and Correlation (Hit only) Sensitivity analysis to evaluate the relative contribution of selected inputs Sensitivity analysis provides an estimation of the relative importance of the inputs. The knowledge of the NN behavior, in relation to input perturbation, helps to assess the relevance of the individual contributions to the output, and to verify the correct training of the NN . The relative sensitivity of the NN to each input is calculated as the ratio between the mean standard deviation (for various perturbations) of the output (surface precipitation rate) and the mean standard deviation of the input (see Sanò et al., 2016). Sensitivity analysis Contingency Tables The algorithms are based on a large database of simulations produced using the UW-NMS Model coupled to a radiative transfer model. The European and Mediterranean dataset was made of 60 simulations (March 2006 - February 2007, see Smith et al., 2013, Casella et al., 2013). For the extension of the algorithms to the MSG full disk area, 34 more simulations have been added , representative of the climatology and precipitation systems characteristic of Africa and Southern Atlantic. The verification study concerned the comparison between the retrieval of PNPR v2 algorithm and estimated precipitation by the two radar, TRMM-PR (NASA TRMM standard product 2A25 (v7)) and GPM-KuPR (2BDPR (v3), Ku Normal Scan). The study was based on coincident observations (within a 15 min time window) in the area of interest, considering the coincident overpasses of SUOMI-NPP and TRMM satellites (African area), and SUOMI- NPP and GPM core satellites (European area). The TRMM-PR, and GPM-Ku, rainfall rate at the surface were downscaled to the ATMS nominal resolution variable along the scan line. The statistics have been computed on a regular grid at 0.5°x0.5° resolution Density scatterplots of the PNPR v2 retrievals over over European area and African area versus collocated radar measurements (GPM-Ku and TRMM- PR respectively). Retrievals were regridded at a 0.5° × 0.5°resolution. We have compared the performances over the African area of the PNPR v2 with the PNPR v1, to evaluate whether the use of the new ATMS channels and the newly designed NN have led to improvements in the retrievals. The performance of the PNPR v1 (AMSU-A/MHS) algorithm has been tested on the same two years period (2013-2014) used for PNPR v2 (ATMS), considering coincident observations of AMSU/MHS radiometers. Comparison between PNPR v1 (AMSU-A/MHS) and PNPR v2 (ATMS) Arid land PNPR v1/PNPR v2 Vegetated land PNPR v1/PNPR v2 Coast PNPR v1/PNPR v2 Ocean PNPR v1/PNPR v2 BIAS (mm h -1 ) 0.30/-0.05 -0.09/-0.08 0.15/0.05 0.63/0.05 CC 0.66/0.64 0.68/0.71 0.75/0.65 0.60/0.69 RMSE (mm h -1 ) 1.84/0.80 1.66/1.11 1.73/1.37 2.25/1.30 Brightness Temperature ∆13=183.31±1 -183.31±3 GHz ∆37=183.31±3 -183.31±7 GHz ∆17=183.31±1 -183.31±7 GHz LCT at 31.4, 88.2, 165GHz (CCA) Additional Inputs: Surface type, Monthly mean TPW , Season, Surface height, Zenith angle. Precipitation Phase Map Percentage of Confidence Map PNPR-ATMS Rain Rate (mm/h) ∆24=183.31±1.8 -183.31±2.4 GHz The Database of coincidences for ATMS and Satellite Radar PNPR-ATMS Example of Inputs and Outputs : Tropical-like cyclone in the Mediterranean area (Medicane): November 7, 2014 GPM-Ku Rain Rate (mm/h) TRMM Rain Rate (mm/h) PNPR v2 Rain Rate (mm/h) PNPR v2 Rain Rate (mm/h) European area African area Vegetated Land Vegetated Land Ocean Ocean BIAS -0.08 CC 0.71 RMSE 1.11 BIAS 0.05 CC 0.69 RMSE 1.30 BIAS -0.12 CC 0.59 RMSE 0.82 BIAS 0.12 CC 0.57 RMSE 0.71 Density scatterplots Radar rain rate (mm h -1 ) PNPR v2 rain rate (mm h -1 ) Vegetated land 0.01 ≤ Rad ≤ 0.25 0.25 < Rad ≤ 1.0 1.0 < Rad ≤ 5.0 5.0 < Rad ≤ 15.0 0.01 ≤ PNPR v2 ≤ 0.25 80.3% 35.4% 2.9% 0.0% 0.25 < PNPR v2 ≤ 1.0 17.8% 50.4% 35.1% 6.2% 1.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 10.0 1.9% 13.6% 54.6% 38.4% 5.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 15.0 0.0% 0.6% 7.4% 55.4% Coast 0.01 ≤ Rad ≤ 0.25 0.25 < Rad ≤ 1.0 1.0 < Rad ≤ 5.0 5.0 < Rad ≤ 15.0 0.01 ≤ PNPR v2 ≤ 0.25 86.4% 34,0% 7.1% 0.0% 0.25 < PNPR v2 ≤ 1.0 12.1% 52,3% 31.1% 0.0% 1.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 10.0 1.5% 13.0% 51,0% 26.6% 5.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 15.0 0.0% 0.7% 10.8% 73.4% Ocean 0.01 ≤ Rad ≤ 0.25 0.25 < Rad ≤ 1.0 1.0 < Rad ≤ 5.0 5.0 < Rad ≤ 15.0 0.01 ≤ PNPR v2 ≤ 0.25 85.2% 32.5% 3.7% 0.0% 0.25 < PNPR v2 ≤ 1.0 13.1% 51.4% 30.8% 7.5% 1.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 10.0 1.7 16.0% 54.7% 39.1% 5.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 15.0 0.0% 0.1% 10.8% 53.4% Arid land 0.01 ≤ Rad ≤ 0.25 0.25 < Rad ≤ 1.0 1.0 < Rad ≤ 5.0 5.0 < Rad ≤ 15.0 0.01 ≤ PNPR v2 ≤ 0.25 72.1% 27.6% 1.2% n/a 0.25 < PNPR v2 ≤ 1.0 27.6% 53.4% 37.1% n/a 1.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 10.0 0.3% 18.7% 58.0% n/a 5.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 15.0 0.0% 0.3% 3.7% n/a Common Database: 94 simulations (60 - European area, 34 - African area) Relative Sensitivity PNPR-ATMS

The new PNPR algorithm for the cross-track scanning

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

The new PNPR algorithm for the cross-track scanning radiometer ATMS: description and verification study over Europe and Africa

using GPM and TRMM spaceborne radars

P. Sanò, D. Casella, G. Panegrossi, A. C. Marra, S. Dietrich CNR/ISAC Istituto di Scienze dell'Atmosfera e del Clima

PNPR v2 for the cross-track scanning ATMS radiometer

Verification study over Europe and Africa using TRMM-PR/GPM-Ku-PR

This research was supported by EUMETSAT through the "Satellite Application Facility on Support to Operational Hydrology and Water Management" (H-SAF), by the Earth2Observe FP7 EU funded project, by the Italian Civil Protection Department.

Acknowledgments Casella, D., et al.: A novel algorithm for detection of precipitation in tropical regions

using PMW radiometers, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 1217-1232, doi:10.5194/amt-8-1217-2015, 2015.

Casella, D., et al.: Transitioning from CRD to CDRD in Bayesian retrieval of rainfall from satellite passive microwave measurements, Part 2: Overcoming database profile selection ambiguity by consideration of meteorological control on microphysics, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens, vol.51, no.9, 4650-4671, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2013.2258161, 2013.

Casella, D., et al.: Verification of Cloud Dynamics and Radiation Database (CDRD) passive microwave precipitation retrieval algorithm using TRMM satellite radar and radiometer measurements over southern Mediterranean basin, in: IEEE Proc. MicroRad 2012, 12th Specialist Meeting on Microwave Radiometry and Remote Sensing of the Environment, Rome, Italy, 5-9 March 2012, 4 pp., 2012.

Mugnai, A., et al.: Precipitation products from the Hydrology SAF, Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1959-1981, doi:10.5194/nhess-13-1959-2013, 2013.

Panegrossi et al., A verification study over Europe of AMSU-A/MHS and SSMIS passive microwave precipitation retrievals, Proc. 2013 EUMETSAT/AMS Meteorol. Sat. Conference, Vienna, Sept. 2013,

https://www.eumetsat.int/website/home/News/ConferencesandEvents/PreviousEve

nts/DAT_2027670.html Panegrossi G., et al.: CDRD and PNPR passive microwave precipitation retrieval

algorithms: extension to the MSG full disk area, Proc. 2014 EUMETSAT Meteorological Satellite Conference, Geneva, Sept. 2014, https://www.eumetsat.int/website/home/News/ConferencesandEvents/DAT_2076129.html

Sanò, P., et al.: Transitioning from CRD to CDRD in Bayesian retrieval of rainfall from satellite passive microwave measurements, Part 1: Algorithm description and testing, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., Vol. 51, no. 7, 4119-4143, doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2012.2227332, 2013

Sanò, P., et al.: The Passive microwave Neural network Precipitation Retrieval (PNPR) algorithm for AMSU/MHS observations: description and application to European case studies, Atmos. Meas. Tech., 8, 837-857, doi:10.5194/amt-8-837-2015, 2015.

Sanò, P., et al.: The new Passive microwave Neural network Precipitation Retrieval (PNPR) algorithm for the cross-track scanning ATMS radiometer: description and verification study over Europe and Africa using GPM and TRMM spaceborne radars, Atmos. Meas. Tech. Discuss., doi:10.5194/amt-2016-199, 2016.

References

Contingency table of rain rate values obtained from PNPR v2 and the GPM-Ku and TRMM-PR radar measurements over both European and African areas.

The percentages shown in a given column represent how the PNPR v2 product classifies the precipitation assigned to that class by the radar. There is an appreciable general consistency between the PNPR v2 and the radar measurements, as shown by the values in the cells of the main diagonal of each type of surface background.

This study describes the design of a new algorithm, PNPR v2, for estimation of precipitation on the ground for the cross-track ATMS radiometer, and presents the results of a verification study where the instantaneous precipitation rate estimates available from TRMM and GPM spaceborne radars are used as reference. PNPR v2 has been designed for retrieval of precipitation in the MSG full disk area. The algorithm, based on a neural network approach, represents an evolution of the previous version PNPR v1, designed for the AMSU/MHS radiometer, with some changes made to take advantage of the improvements of ATMS with respect to AMSU/MHS. The verification study carried out through a comparison with co-located observations of ATMS with the NASA/JAXA TRMM-PR and GPM-KuPR spaceborne radars showed a substantial agreement of PNPR v2 with the precipitation products available from the two radars. The systematic errors are small with a relatively high correlation. The performance varies slightly with the surface background (vegetated land, arid land, coast, ocean) and with the geographical areas (Europe and Africa). The results, however, have revealed a slight tendency of PNPR v2 to overestimate moderate to light precipitation over the ocean, especially compared to GPM-KuPR. In the comparison of PNPR v2 and PNPR v1 retrievals, over the African area and based on two years period of coincident observations of ATMS and AMSU/MHS radiometers with TRMM-PR, an appreciably better performance of PNPR v2 has been evidenced by the statistical indexes (RMSE and BIAS values are reduced over all background surfaces), and especially by a great general improvement of the low precipitation estimation, mostly over ocean (both in terms of Relative Bias % and Adjusted FSE%).

Conclusions

Advanced Technology Microwave Sounder

Outputs

PNPR algorithm for AMSU/MHS radiometers (HSAF-H02 A/B) • One ANN for all surface backgrounds; • The Full Disk Algorithm uses two ANNs (ANN-A for European Area, ANN-B for African

Area) • Inputs: AMSU-A/MHS channels (50.2, 89, 157, 183±1., 183±3, 183±7 GHz ) and

geographycal/meteorological parameters. • Precipitation phase and Quality index evaluation

Main differences of PNPR-ATMS (HSAF-H18) with respect to PNPR-AMSU/MHS: • New fully redesigned single ANN trained using both the European/African databases. • The exploitation of two new ATMS channels: Combined use of the 183±1.8 and 183±4.5

GHz channels. • The use of monthly mean Total Precipitable Water to drive ANN in the transition

between tropical and mid-latitude climatic conditions.

PMW Neural-net Precipitation Retrieval (PNPR) Algorithms for cross-track scanners (AMSU-A/MHS and ATMS)

ATMS is cross-track scanning microwave radiometer on board the Suomi National Polar-orbiting Partnership (NPP) satellite. Compared with AMSU and MHS, ATMS has improved resolution and sampling and a wider swath to reduces the orbital gaps. Three new channels are added: channel 4 (51.76 GHz) for lower tropospheric temperature sounding and the two channels 19 and 21 (183.31±4.5 GHz and 183.31±1.8 GHz) to enhance the water vapour profiling performance.

• We only compared the pixels where the precipitations from both radiometer and radar data were greater than 0 mm h-1 (hits). • For the evaluation of statistical indexes for a given geographical location all coincident estimates of ATMS and TRMM-PR or GPM- Ku, corresponding to that position, were considered regardless of the time of overpasses. •The statistical indexes were evaluated without making a distinction between solid and liquid precipitation, thus including pixels with snow or ice on the ground.

Geographical distribution of Bias, RMSE and Correlation (Hit only)

Sensitivity analysis to evaluate the relative contribution of selected inputs

Sensitivity analysis provides an estimation of the relative importance of the inputs. The knowledge of the NN behavior, in relation to input perturbation, helps to assess the relevance of the individual contributions to the output, and to verify the correct training of the NN. The relative sensitivity of the NN to each input is calculated as the ratio between the mean standard deviation (for various perturbations) of the output (surface precipitation rate) and the mean standard deviation of the input (see Sanò et al., 2016).

Sensitivity analysis

Contingency Tables

The algorithms are based on a large database of simulations produced using the UW-NMS Model coupled to a radiative transfer model. The European and Mediterranean dataset was made of 60 simulations (March 2006 - February 2007, see Smith et al., 2013, Casella et al., 2013). For the extension of the algorithms to the MSG full disk area, 34 more simulations have been added, representative of the climatology and precipitation systems characteristic of Africa and Southern Atlantic.

• The verification study concerned the comparison between the retrieval of PNPR v2 algorithm and estimated precipitation by the two radar, TRMM-PR (NASA TRMM standard product 2A25 (v7)) and GPM-KuPR (2BDPR (v3), Ku Normal Scan).

• The study was based on coincident observations (within a 15 min time window) in the area of interest, considering the coincident overpasses of SUOMI-NPP and TRMM satellites (African area), and SUOMI-NPP and GPM core satellites (European area).

• The TRMM-PR, and GPM-Ku, rainfall rate at the surface were downscaled to the ATMS nominal resolution variable along the scan line.

• The statistics have been computed on a regular grid at 0.5°x0.5° resolution

• Density scatterplots of the PNPR v2 retrievals over over European area and African area versus collocated radar measurements (GPM-Ku and TRMM- PR respectively). • Retrievals were regridded at a 0.5° × 0.5°resolution.

We have compared the performances over the African area of the PNPR v2 with the PNPR v1, to evaluate whether the use of the new ATMS channels and the newly designed NN have led to improvements in the retrievals. The performance of the PNPR v1 (AMSU-A/MHS) algorithm has been tested on the same two years period (2013-2014) used for PNPR v2 (ATMS), considering coincident observations of AMSU/MHS radiometers.

Comparison between PNPR v1 (AMSU-A/MHS) and PNPR v2 (ATMS)

Arid land PNPR v1/PNPR

v2

Vegetated land PNPR

v1/PNPR v2

Coast PNPR

v1/PNPR v2

Ocean PNPR

v1/PNPR v2 BIAS (mm h-1) 0.30/-0.05 -0.09/-0.08 0.15/0.05 0.63/0.05 CC 0.66/0.64 0.68/0.71 0.75/0.65 0.60/0.69 RMSE (mm h-1) 1.84/0.80 1.66/1.11 1.73/1.37 2.25/1.30

Brightness Temperature

∆13=183.31±1 -183.31±3 GHz ∆37=183.31±3 -183.31±7 GHz ∆17=183.31±1 -183.31±7 GHz

LCT at 31.4, 88.2, 165GHz (CCA) Additional Inputs:

Surface type, Monthly mean TPW,

Season, Surface height,

Zenith angle.

Precipitation Phase Map Percentage of Confidence Map

PNPR-ATMS Rain Rate (mm/h)

∆24=183.31±1.8 -183.31±2.4 GHz

The Database of coincidences for ATMS and Satellite Radar

PNPR-ATMS Example of Inputs and Outputs : Tropical-like cyclone in the Mediterranean area (Medicane): November 7, 2014

GPM-Ku Rain Rate (mm/h) TRMM Rain Rate (mm/h) PN

PR v

2 Ra

in R

ate

(mm

/h)

PNPR

v2

Rain

Rat

e (m

m/h

)

European area African area

Vegetated Land Vegetated Land

Ocean Ocean

BIAS -0.08 CC 0.71 RMSE 1.11

BIAS 0.05 CC 0.69 RMSE 1.30

BIAS -0.12 CC 0.59 RMSE 0.82

BIAS 0.12 CC 0.57 RMSE 0.71

Density scatterplots

Radar rain rate (mm h-1)

PNPR

v2

rain

rate

(mm

h-1

)

Vegetated land 0.01 ≤ Rad ≤ 0.25 0.25 < Rad ≤ 1.0 1.0 < Rad ≤ 5.0 5.0 < Rad ≤ 15.0 0.01 ≤ PNPR v2 ≤ 0.25 80.3% 35.4% 2.9% 0.0% 0.25 < PNPR v2 ≤ 1.0 17.8% 50.4% 35.1% 6.2% 1.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 10.0 1.9% 13.6% 54.6% 38.4% 5.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 15.0 0.0% 0.6% 7.4% 55.4%

Coast 0.01 ≤ Rad ≤ 0.25 0.25 < Rad ≤ 1.0 1.0 < Rad ≤ 5.0 5.0 < Rad ≤ 15.0 0.01 ≤ PNPR v2 ≤ 0.25 86.4% 34,0% 7.1% 0.0% 0.25 < PNPR v2 ≤ 1.0 12.1% 52,3% 31.1% 0.0% 1.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 10.0 1.5% 13.0% 51,0% 26.6% 5.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 15.0 0.0% 0.7% 10.8% 73.4%

Ocean 0.01 ≤ Rad ≤ 0.25 0.25 < Rad ≤ 1.0 1.0 < Rad ≤ 5.0 5.0 < Rad ≤ 15.0 0.01 ≤ PNPR v2 ≤ 0.25 85.2% 32.5% 3.7% 0.0% 0.25 < PNPR v2 ≤ 1.0 13.1% 51.4% 30.8% 7.5% 1.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 10.0 1.7 16.0% 54.7% 39.1% 5.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 15.0 0.0% 0.1% 10.8% 53.4%

Arid land 0.01 ≤ Rad ≤ 0.25 0.25 < Rad ≤ 1.0 1.0 < Rad ≤ 5.0 5.0 < Rad ≤ 15.0 0.01 ≤ PNPR v2 ≤ 0.25 72.1% 27.6% 1.2% n/a 0.25 < PNPR v2 ≤ 1.0 27.6% 53.4% 37.1% n/a 1.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 10.0 0.3% 18.7% 58.0% n/a 5.0 < PNPR v2 ≤ 15.0 0.0% 0.3% 3.7% n/a

Common Database: 94 simulations (60 - European area, 34 - African area)

Rel

ativ

e Se

nsiti

vity

PNPR-ATMS