The Nation’s Report Card: 2005 Reading and Mathematics Trial Urban District Assessments

Background of TUDA

1

2005 Trial Urban District Assessment Map

2

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. National Center for Education Statistics.

Overview

3

Overall Findings – Grade 4

4

Overall Findings – Grade 4 (cont.)

5

Overall Findings – Grade 8

6

Overall Findings – Grade 8 (cont.)

7

2005 Mathematics Assessment

8

Score Results, Grade 4: 2003 and 2005

9

* Significantly different from 2005.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessments.

Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 4: 2005

10

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 4: 2005

11

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

Score Changes by Race/Ethnicity, Grade 4: 2003-2005

NOTE: Shaded area indicates reporting standards not met.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessments.

12

White – Black Score Gap, Grade 4: 2005

NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

13

White – Hispanic Score Gap, Grade 4: 2005

‡ Reporting standards not met.NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

14

Score Results, Grade 8: 2003 and 2005

15

* Significantly different from 2005.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2003 and 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessments.

Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 8: 2005

16

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 8: 2005

17

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

Score Comparisons to Large Central City for Students Eligibile for Free/Reduced-Price School Lunch, Grade 8: 2005

18

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Mathematics Assessment.

2005 Reading Assessment

19

Score Results, Grade 4: 2002 - 2005

20

* Significantly different from 2005.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 2002–2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessments.

Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 4: 2005

21

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 4: 2005

22

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

Score Results by Race/Ethnicity, Grade 4: 2005

23

‡ Reporting standards not met for Hispanic students in Atlanta.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

Score Results, Grade 8: 2002 - 2005

24

* Significantly different from 2005.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), various years, 2002–2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessments.

Score Comparisons to the Nation, Grade 8: 2005

25

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

Score and Achievement-Level Comparison to Large Central City, Grade 8: 2005

26

SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

White – Black Score Gap, Grade 8: 2005

27

‡ Reporting standards not met.NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

White – Hispanic Score Gap, Grade 8: 2005

28

‡ Reporting standards not met.NOTE: Score gaps are calculated based on differences between unrounded average scale scores.SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 2005 Trial Urban District Reading Assessment.

For More Information

29