Upload
trinhliem
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
591
THE LANCET.
LONDON: SATURDAY, MARCH 2, 1912.
The National Insurance Act.ALTHOUGH there has been no abatement of genuine
interest in the National Insurance Act within the ranks of
the profession, the past week has been one of comparativequiet in the medical world so far as outward signs go. The
Representative Meeting of the British Medical Association
on Feb. 20th-22nd arrived at conclusions which have broughtit home to all that there is a pressing need for a steadfast
attitude. The state of comparative calm in which we now
are suggests very strongly that the practical compromisereached by the opposing parties in the governing bodyof the Association has been approved by many of their
constituencies, and that some basis of united action has at
last been hammered out. This view depends, of course,
upon the assumption that the Council of the Association, in
whose hands all executive power is vested, intends to carryinto effect the instructions which it has now received. The
policy set out in the leading resolution of the RepresentativeBody, and unanimously agreed upon by the delegates, seems
to stand midway between the courses advocated by extremists
on either side, and has met with little adverse criticism.
But while for the present the tide of comment has receded,
it is clear that the National Medical Union is not content
with a situation that still has its deep anxieties. A moderate
policy which can weld conflicting medical interests without ’,,
estranging public sympathy may carry the day for the ’,medical profession, but it is idle to suppose that the battleis won because peace may be restored within the ranks of
the British Medical Association. In the long and arduous
struggle which is still ahead the advice and support of the
great corporations should prove of real value.The demand that the minimum requirements of the
medical profession should be guaranteed in the Regulations,with a view to their ratification by Parliament, and theintimation that failing this the medical profession will
stand aside from the Act, seem together to strike a meanbetween the wholly non possumus attitude and the
dangerous plan of continuing flaccid negotiations. When the
Act, in a form which all men. saw to lead straight to numerousdifficulties, became law at the close of last year, the
split in the medical profession seemed for the moment
beyond repair-a party which wished to work the Act was
straightly opposed to one which would have none of it, andthe political newspapers worked hard to widen the breach. ;
It was then that we made the suggestion that the
way out of the impasse was for the medical professionto concentrate attention upon the Regulations, and onlyto refuse medical service if these proved to be unsatis-
factory. This proposal, we considered, would avoid the prob-ability of disastrous local bargaining, while avoiding also
the attitude of complete summary refusal. Recent events
have shown that this policy is acceptable to many medicalmen of divergent opinions as a workable basis of union, andif the constituencies of the British Medical Association
can also bring themselves to accept the compromisearrived at by their Representatives, and to stand by it whilethe crisis lasts, the future can be regarded as brighter.Union within our body must exact all the recognition of our
rights which it is in the scope of the Commissioners to
grant ; and if their powers fall short of what some believe of
them, our solidarity will lead the Government to amend theAct, lest a brave scheme for improving the nation’s healthshould fail miserably of its main object.
The Present Position of Salvarsan.ON the first introduction of a new drug it is by no means
easy to express a decided opinion as to its merits, especiallywhen the disease for which it is employed is liable to reappearmany months and years after apparently it has been cured.Of all diseases with which we are acquainted syphilis is
probably the one about which it is most difficult to be
certain that a permanent cure has been effected; for afterintervals which may often be measund by years some mani-festation may appear showing clearly that the virus has beenlatent in the body during the lengthy interval. Therefore
when a new remedy is brought forward as more capable of
effecting a complete and permanent cure of syphilis than was
possible or at least easy by any other method, it is onlynatural that some of those who had many years’ experiencein the treatment of the disease should look askance at a
remedy for which so great a claim was made ; for bymeans of mercury judiciously, persevericgly. and thoroughlyadministered results of the very greatest value have been
obtained..- It is difficult to forsake a tried remedy for a
new drug. Now sufficient time has elapsed since the intro-duction of salvarsan for us to form some idea as to its valueand its’.risks ; it is, however, not yet possible to make anydogmatic statement as,to the position which the remedywill hold in the future-whether in, say, ten years’time it will be widely used or whether it will have
lost much of its" present popularity. That salvarsan
has a great power against the treponema pallidum is
beyond dispute, but the occurrence of a number of fatal
cases has shown that it is by no means free from danger ;we are, perhaps, in a position to inquire whether these
deaths are a necessary accompaniment of the administrationof the drug or whether they, or most of them, might have beenavoided by greater attention to the method and details ofadministration.
It must not be forgotten that salvarsan was not a
natural substance employed empirically, but a substance
obtained as the result of a long series of experiments con-ducted on the most modern scientific lines. The problem