The National Center for Special Education Research (NCSER) in IES

New Opportunities

for Research

Edward J. Kame’enui

Patricia A. Gonzalez

IDEA Reauthorization in 2004

Amended the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002 to establish the National Center for Special Education Research in the Institute of Education Sciences (IES)

Transferred responsibility for special education research and “Studies and Evaluations” (except for the Annual Report) from the Office of Special Education Programs to NCSER.

Organizational Structure of IES

Office of the DirectorGrover J. Whitehurst, Director

National Board for Education SciencesRobert C. Granger,

ChairSonia Chessen,

Executive Director

National Center for Education

Evaluation and Regional

AssistancePhoebe

Cottingham,Commissioner

National Center for Education

Research

Lynn Okagaki,Commissioner

National Center for Education

Statistics

Mark Schneider, Commissioner

National Center for Special Education Research

Edward J. Kame’enui,

Commissioner

Organizational Structure of IES

Office of the DirectorGrover J. Whitehurst, Director

National Board for Education SciencesRobert C. Granger,

ChairSonia Chessen,

Executive Director

Office of Science

Andrew White,

Deputy Director for Science

Office of Administration

and Policy

Sue Betka,Deputy Director for Administration and

Policy

Office of Communications

and Outreach

Mike Bowler, Director of

Communications and Outreach

Office of Information Technology

Gerald Malitz,Chief Information Technology Officer

Reauthorization of IDEA: Public Law 108-446 December 3, 2004

NCSER’s mission

“(1) to sponsor research to expand knowledge and understanding of the needs of infants, toddlers, and children with disabilities in order to improve the developmental, educational, and transitional results of such individuals;

Reauthorization of IDEA: Public Law 108-446 December 3, 2004

NCSER’s mission

(2) to sponsor research to improve services provided under, and support the implementation of, the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (20 U.S.C. 1400 et seq.);

(3) to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of IDEA in coordination with the National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance.”

NCSER’s five organizing principles

1. The science must come first.2. We must invest wisely and strategically.3. Research in special education and early

intervention is at the heart of NCSER.4. Building research capacity is not a “Lone

Ranger” endeavor.5. Good science is not enough; results must

lead to high quality performance and delivery systems.

FY 2007 Grant Competitions

Close July 27, 2006:

Early Intervention, Early Childhood Special Education, and Assessment for Young Children with Disabilities

Mathematics and Science Reading, Writing, and Language Serious Behavior Disorders Assessment for Accountability

FY 2007 Grant Competitions

Close November 16, 2006:

Individualized Education Programs and Individualized Family Service Plans

Secondary and Transition Services Quality of Teacher and Other Service

Providers for Students with Disabilities Autism Spectrum Disorders Response to Intervention

Research Grant Program Goals

Goals differ by topic area and include: Goal 1: Identifying promising practices. Goal 2: Developing and testing new approaches. Goal 3: Conducting efficacy and replication trials. Goal 4: Conducting large scale evaluations. Goal 5: Developing and validating assessments.

Funding amount varies between $100K to $1.2 M per year for up to five years

Purposes of Selected 2007 Grant Competitions

The purpose of the Serious Behavior Disorders Research Grants Program is to contribute to the improvement of the behavioral and social skills and concomitantly, the developmental and academic outcomes of infants, toddlers, children and youth with disabilities

The purpose of the Autism Grants Program is to develop and evaluate comprehensive school-based interventions intended to address the cognitive, communicative, academic, social, and behavioral needs of children identified with ASD in preschool through middle school.

Potential Research Questions: Behavior Disorders

• What levels of intervention intensity, specificity, or emphasis are necessary to ensure high threshold levels of performance on a range of academic, social, behavioral or developmental measures?

• How can functional behavioral assessments be designed, conducted and used to develop and monitor the effectiveness of positive behavioral interventions?

• What are appropriate positive behavioral interventions for infants and what are the conditions for their use?

• What are the critical social skills that function as mediators or moderators for negative in-school outcomes such as disciplinary actions, restrictive placement decisions, or grade retention?

Potential Research Questions: Autism

• What levels of intervention intensity, specificity or emphasis are necessary to ensure high threshold levels of performance on a range of cognitive, academic, social, behavioral, or developmental outcome measures?

• What child (e.g., developmental age, language skills), family (e.g., perceived support), and/or environmental (e.g., structured, natural) variables mediate and moderate an intervention?

• What are the key components or elements of an intervention program in a range of complex but typical settings (e.g., home, school) that are experimentally linked to enhancing, promoting, and sustaining functional and academic outcomes for children with ASD?

IES Peer Review Process

Fund research projects that fulfill IES’ mission and address its priorities• Quality• Rigor • Relevance

Provide integrity and support• Growth of the education science community• Respect for funding decisions

Provide feedback that improves the quality of applications

Who are the Panel Members?

There are Principal, Rotating, and Ad Hoc members Recruitment

• Highly qualified experts• In-depth expertise in research methods and panel topic• Bring diversity on disciplinary, institutional, and other

dimensions Selection

• Meet topic and methodology needs of the competitions• Appointments are proposed by the Deputy Director for

Science • Approved by the Director

Overview of the Application Process

Announcements released (Web, Federal Register, etc.)

Letters of intent are submitted Applications are submitted (via web) Applications are screened Applications are sent to reviewers Applications triaged Full panel review Notification

Pre-panel Meeting Process

Application review• 2 or 3 reviewers per application• All reviewers are considered to be primary reviewers• Scoring:

Significance, research plan, personnel, resources – 7-point scale from 1(poor) to 7 (excellent) for each

criterion Overall score

– 5-point scale from 5.0 (poor) to 1.0 (outstanding) for each application

Criterion and Overall scores are independent

Panel Meeting Process

Plenary session and panel orientations Nomination of triaged applications Reviewer scores are recorded Presentation of application by Reviewer 1,

Reviewer 2 (& 3) add comments Panel discussion

Panel Meeting Process-continued

Summary of panel discussion by note taker Revisiting scores/write-ups of primary

reviewers Confidential scoring by all panel members Funding Enthusiasm Scores

What % of Grants Received are Funded?

Data from FY 2006: Reading & Writing 11%Early Intervention 15%Language & Vocabulary 21%Serious Behavior Disorders 25%

2007 Grant Competitions

Announced in Federal Register for Wednesday, March 22, 2006

For three centers in IES—NCER, NCSER, NCES

The Request for Applications (RFA) is now available at:http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ies/programs.html

Timeline for FY 2007 (10/06-9/07)

Year 2006 2007

Month J F M A M J J A S O N D J F M A

Event 1-- 2 3,4 5

 

Event Description:

1.   Funding announcement (RFA’s, web, Federal Register)

2. First round submissions due

3. First panel review sessions held

4. Second round submissions due

5. Second panel review sessions held