56
The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1 ..Logo from the ongoing logo contest..

The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

The LHeC project

Olaf Behnke (DESY)

INT workshop – Science case for an EIC

Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010

1

..Logo from the ongoinglogo contest..

Page 2: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Need for LHeC27.5 GeV x 920 GeV ep HERA

with integrated L~0.5 fb-1 was a high precision machine for QCD modest precision machine for electroweak physics

Where could we go with a 20-150 GeV x 7 TeV e±p, also eA collider with integrated L~1-100 fb-1 ?

2

Page 3: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Lepton proton scattering experiments

LHeC = highest

energy andhigh lumi

3

Page 4: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Physics and Range

High mass 1-2 TeVrq few times 10-20 m

High precisionpartons in plateauof the LHC

Nuclear

Structure& dynamics

High Density Matter

Large x

LHeC grand picture

Talk Content:Accelerator1. Inclusive DIS & PDFs 2. Jets, c,b,t3. Low x, saturation4. EW and BSM

4

Page 5: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

LHeC Accelerator options

4

111232

)(11

])[/100(][35.0

507.1

10102.8

,)5.0(8.1,8.3,107.1

4

GeVEMWPmAI

mA

ImNscmL

M

EmmN

I

e

NL

ee

e

pypx

p

p

pypxpp

pypx

e

pn

p

Ring-Ring

Power Limit of 100 MW wall plug“ultimate” LHC proton beam60 GeV e± beam

L = 2 1033 cm-2s-1 O(100) fb-1

5

Page 6: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

LHeC Accelerator options

L 1

4N p

p1

*

Iee

N p 1.71011, p 3.8m,* 0.2m, 7000/0.94

L 81031cm 2s 1N p10

11

1.70.2

* /mIe /mA

1

Ie mAP /MW

E e /GeV

LINAC Ring 60 GeV “Circus Maximus” withEnergy recovery: P=P0/(1-η)β*=0.1mL = 1033 cm-2s-1 O(100) fb-1

140 GeV LINAC few times 1032

6

Page 7: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Max Klein - Scenarios and Measurements

1. Inclusive NC & CC DIS: simulated Default Scenarioshttp://hep.ph.liv.ac.uk/~mklein/simdis09/lhecsim.Dmp.CC, readfirst

Not simulated

Max Klein, LHeC

7

Page 8: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

8Max Klein - Scenarios and Measurements

Kinematics – high Q2

Need excellent forward hadron calorimetry & calibration

8

Page 9: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

The Detector ‘that should do it’: - Low Lumi (Low Q2) Setup

- Solenoid surrounding the HAC modules-Outer detectors (HAC tailcatcher/muon detectors not shown) to be discussed: very forward detector setup (proton taggers)

To be optimised

9

Page 10: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Max Klein - Scenarios and Measurements

Trivial, but important: largest Elep allows highest Q2 scales

Pseudodata: Neutral Current Event Pseudodata: Neutral Current Event RatesRates

10

Page 11: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Photon and Z exchanges are 1:1

11

2 charges and2 polarisationsvery desirable

for electroweakprecision physics

and anew spectroscopy

should that appear.

Z effects depend on lepton charge and

polarisation.

x=0.2100 GeV7000 GeV

F2

yZ ZZ

11

Page 12: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Charge Asymmetry xF3Z

60x7000 GeV2

P=010fb-1

Get handle on valence quarks down to x~0.001

12

Page 13: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Parity violating polarisation asymmetries(for 60 GeV and 140 GeV lepton beams)

SLAC 1978 13

Page 14: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

14Max Klein - Scenarios and Measurements

Rates

LHeC: expect ~ two orders of magnitudemore events + better coverage forx>0.5

Max Klein - Scenarios and Measurements

Pseudodata: Charged Current Event Rates

q

q’

14

Page 15: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Charged Currents

Valence quarksup to x=0.8

Unfold U,D and anti U,D

15

Page 16: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Strange =? Anti-strange quark density

oh

oh

syst

q

c

fb

csW

10

1

1.0

01.0

1.0

1 1

Some dimuon and K data,but never properly measured Use e- p data for

sbar 16

Page 17: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

How well do we know PDFs today? gg parton luminosities

Agree in region relevant for Higgs at LHC, but diverge towards smaller/largest shat

G. Watt

17

Page 18: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

18

Proton PDF fit at LHeC Q2 = 100 GeV2

Scenario D

» only PDF parameters free(LHeC NC and CC e±p included)

Large improvements, model and parameterisation uncertainties to be studied

Claire Gwenlan

18

Page 19: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Sea quark uncertainties and usual constraint ubar=dbar for x0

release constraint

Voica Radescu

With LHeC can get ridof such

assumptions

with constraint

HERA only

Adding LHeC

19

Page 20: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Plenary ECFA, LHeC, Max Klein, CERN 30.11.2007

Further PDF improvements at LHeC with ep + eD

crucial constraint on evolution (S-NS), improved s

20

Page 21: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Simulation of s measurement at LHeC

1/

fine structure

weak

strong

T.Kluge/M.Klein Divonne 09

Improve at LHeC to ~ permille

precision level 21

Page 22: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

2. High pt Jets

sensitive to g(x), photon structure and s

22

Page 23: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

23

Page 24: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

24

Page 25: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Will reduce significantly theory (higher order) uncertainty for s

extraction from jet data

O(s3)

25

Page 26: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

2. Charm & beauty

sensitive to g(x) 26

Page 27: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

for PDF fits27

Page 28: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

x=0.00003

x=0.00007

x=0.0003

x=0.0007

x=0.003

x=0.007

x=0.0000

x=0.03

x=0.1

x=0.3

1 fb 1

c 0.1bgdq 0.01

syst 0.1

h 1o

h 10o

Max Klein

Charm in DIS: test intrinsic charm in p

Expected to show up at xb >0.1

Requires c-tagging in very foward direction (~1 deg.)

28

Page 29: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

O.B.

Beauty in DIS: determine b-density in proton x=0.000001

HERA

coverage

Q2>>mb2

O.Behnke

x=0.2

In MSSM Higgs production is b dominated

29

Use for LHC

predictions

Page 30: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

30

Page 31: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

31

Page 32: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

3. Entering the mysterious world of low

x physics

32

Page 33: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

33

Low-x Physics and Non-linear EvolutionLow-x Physics and Non-linear Evolution

• Somewhere & somehow, the low x growth of cross sectionsmust be tamed to satisfy unitarity … non-linear effects • Usually characterised in terms of an x dependent “saturation scale”, Q2

s(x), to be determined experimentally

Note: This and following slides

Courtesy Paul Newmanor Anna Statso

33

Page 34: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

34

Going beyond HERA with Inclusive LHeC DataGoing beyond HERA with Inclusive LHeC Data

[Armesto]

Enhance target `blackness’ by:

1) Probing lower x at fixed Q2 in ep

2) Increasing target matter in eA… target density ~ A1/3 ~ 6 for Pb

34

Page 35: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

35

Saturation region reach: LHeC vs EIC

EIC

LHeC

7 TeV x 100 GeV

35

Page 36: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

36

Non DGLAP

36

Page 37: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Including LHeC data in NNPDF DGLAP fit approach …

… sizeable improvement in error on low x gluon when both LHeC F2 & FL data are included.

… but would DGLAP fits fail if non-linear effects present?

Fitting for the Gluon with LHeC FFitting for the Gluon with LHeC F22 and F and FLL

(Gufanti, Rojo …) (Gufanti, Rojo …)

HERA + LHeC F2 HERA + LHeC F2, FL

(Q2 = 2 GeV2)

37

Page 38: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Conclusion: clearly establishing non-linear effects needs aminimum of 2 observables … next try F2

c in place of FL …

Can Parton Saturation be Established @ Can Parton Saturation be Established @ LHeC? LHeC?

Simulated LHeC F2 and FL data based on a dipole model containing low x saturation (FS04-sat)…

… NNPDF (also HERA framework) DGLAP QCD fits cannot accommodate saturation effects if F2 and FL both fitted

[Rojo]

38

Page 39: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

39

eA: Impact of LHeC data on nuclear parton densities

39

Page 40: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

4040

Page 41: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Q2

VM:,,,J/

Elastic Vector meson production in ep scattering

p p

e

e

t

Wp

➔ Obtain 3d-picture of proton

qqbar-dipol

gluons

Large t probe densest part of proton

41

Page 42: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Dedicated Low x Linac-Ring Scenario Dedicated Low x Linac-Ring Scenario

Dream scenario!!!

42

J/ photoproductiondouble differentiallyin W and t, Ee=150 GeV1o acceptance

Probing x ~ 3.10-6

at eff Q2 ~ 2.5 GeV2

c.f. GB-W model xs ~ 7.10-6 at Q2 ~ 2.5 GeV2

Page 43: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

4343

Page 44: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Inclusive DiffractionInclusive Diffraction

Additional variables …

xIP = fractional momentum loss of proton (momentum fraction IP/p)

b = x / xIP (momentum fraction q / IP)

Further sensitivity to saturation phenomena Diffractive parton densities in much increased range Sensitivity to rapidity gap survival issues Can relate ep diffraction to eA shadowing … Link between ep and eA for interpreting inclusive data

44

Page 45: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Worked well: The methods have very different systs!What is possible at LHeC?…

Signatures and Selection Methods at HERA

`Large Rapidity Gap’ adjacent to outgoing (untagged) proton

- Allows t measurement- Limited by stats and p-tagging systs Limited by p-diss

systs

Scattered proton in ZEUSLPS or H1 FPS

ηmax

45

Page 46: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

46

New region of Diffractive MassesNew region of Diffractive MassesNo alternative to proton spectrometer to select high Mx

• `Proper’ QCD (e.g. large ET) with jets and charm accessible• New diffractive channels … beauty, W / Z / H(?) bosons• Unfold quantum numbers / precisely measure new 1-- states

(xIP<0.05)

46

Page 47: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

4. SM electroweak and new physics at the high energy

frontier

HERA

LHeCLHeC

Light quark couplings to ZSM Higgs productionLeptoquarks + many other possibilities, e.g. excited leptons, anomalous single top production, etc. 47

Page 48: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Fermion couplings to Z boson

Claire

Gwenlan.

LHeC could measure u and d couplings with ~1% precision

48

Page 49: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Backup slides

49

Page 50: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

50

New physics example Leptoquarks: determine quantum Numbers at LHeC

Charge asymmetry much cleaner in ep than in pp. Similar for simultaneous determination of coupling and quark flavour. Polarisation for spectroscopy

JINST 1 2006 P10001

Single LQ production at LHC

Single LQ production at LHeC

e-p vs e+p asymmetries at LHeC will reveal the Fermion number F

50

Page 51: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

The LHeC has potential to completely unfold the partonic content of the proton: u,d, c,s, t,b for the first time and in an unprecedent kinematic range. This is based on inclusive NC, CC cross sections complemented by heavy quark identification.

Puzzles as u/d at large x or a strange-antistrange asymmetry will be solved.

Precision measurements are possible of xg (up to large x) and the beauty density which are of particular relevance for the LHC. The (almost) whole p structure which the LHC assumes to know will become accurately known. Determine s with permille level precision

Wealth of QCD tests with final states (not much discussed in this talk : Jets (study also photon structure), heavy flavours, prompt photons, other identified particles Low x and diffractive physics with ep and eA: Measuring multiple observables (F2, Fl, F2c, F2D, Vector mesons…) in ep and eA can lead to a microscopic understanding of non-linear evolution, unitarity constraints and parton saturation

Electroweak and new physics - Light quark couplings to Z at ~1% level - SM Higgs production for H-> bb coupling - New physics: Leptoquarks and quantum numbers, quark radius, leptons* and more!

Summary

51

Page 52: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Backup slides

52

Page 53: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Master formulae for NC DIS

Vary charge and polarisation and beam energy to disentangle contributions

Page 54: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

Charged Currents

Complete unfolding of all parton distributions to unprecedented accuracy

Page 55: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

5555

1⁰ and 179⁰ 2⁰ and 178⁰ 3⁰ and 177⁰ 4⁰ and 176⁰ 5⁰ and 175⁰

10⁰ and 170⁰

250217 250 250 217

17740 40

177

[cm]

289

112

4020

The High Lumi (High Q2)

SetupHaC-BarrelModules

EmC-Barrel

Central TrackingHaC-insert-2

EmC-insert-2

L1 Low Q2 SetUp High Q2 SetUp- Fwd/Bwd Tracking & EmC-Extensions, HaC-Insert-1 removed -Calo-Inserts in position-Strong Focussing Magnet installed

Strong FocussingMagnet

(to be optimised)

Page 56: The LHeC project Olaf Behnke (DESY) INT workshop – Science case for an EIC Seattle, WA, November 18, 2010 1..Logo from the ongoing logo contest

O.B.

HERA 27.5 x 920

Obtained with PYTHIA, RAPGAP and LEPTO

LHeC is a multi

flavour factory

Events per 10 fb-1 Lumi

1010

108

4x106

4x105

105

103

Single Top