Upload
damienxscott
View
24
Download
1
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The distribution and intensity of circumsolar radiation can be an important performance determinant for optically concentrating solar thermal systems. Its characteristics are determined by the composition and size distribution of atmospheric aerosols. Relative humidity has previously been shown to significantly alter these aerosol size distributions particularly for values beyond 70%. A model was developed to explore the relationship between circumsolar radiation and relative humidity and was applied meteorological data from to nine Australian locations. Results confirmed the increase in circumsolar radiation with relative humidity with the distribution highly dependent on aerosol composition. Consideration of a minimum operational threshold at the 9 locations suggest that the increased aerosol effects for relative humidity beyond 70% would rarely be experienced. Average circumsolar ratios obtained by applying the model to locations data were typically below 0.03.
Citation preview
SCHOOL OF PHYSICS
HONOURS REPORT
2006
The interaction between relative humidity and circumsolar radiation and its effects on concentrating solar thermal
systems in Australia
Damien Scott Department of Plasma and Applied Physics
The University of Sydney
Abstract
The distribution and intensity of circumsolar radiation can be an important performance determinant
for optically concentrating solar thermal systems. Its characteristics are determined by the
composition and size distribution of atmospheric aerosols. Relative humidity has previously been
shown to significantly alter these aerosol size distributions particularly for values beyond 70%. A
model was developed to explore the relationship between circumsolar radiation and relative
humidity and was applied meteorological data from to nine Australian locations. Results confirmed
the increase in circumsolar radiation with relative humidity with the distribution highly dependent
on aerosol composition. Consideration of a minimum operational threshold at the 9 locations
suggest that the increased aerosol effects for relative humidity beyond 70% would rarely be
experienced. Average circumsolar ratios obtained by applying the model to locations data were
typically below 0.03.
Statements
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank my primary supervisor, Dr. Yonbai Yin, who - in addition to being responsible
for initially piquing my interest in solar energy - has provided guidance, an eclectic knowledge of
science, and many hours of discussion about all things related to climate change.
In addition I would like to thank Associate Professor Michael Box for very kindly agreeing to
provide guidance and advice on the meteorological aspects of the project.
The Australian Bureau of Meteorology provided the data used in this project in a most efficient and
helpful manner free of charge despite the cost exceeding the regular allowance for research
students. Finally I thank Craig F. Bohren for peppering his textbooks with personality and dry wit –
a welcome respite from the otherwise typically bland offerings.
Statement of Contribution of the Student
The majority of the work described in this report relates to the construction of computer simulations
and data analysis, all of which I carried out independently. Numerous different computer code
components and routines were required to fulfil the goals of this project, all of which I wrote and
tested in MATLAB. Many of the calculations required are well established and therefore source
code, typically in FORTRAN, is available. Thus some of the routines and functions are essentially
ports of algorithms with the necessary modifications to suit the purposes of this study. The
microphysical and aerosol optical data used was obtained from the electronically available Global
Aerosol Data Set. The Australian relative humidity and radiation data were provided by the
Australian bureau of Meteorology via a custom extraction routine and delivered in raw ASCII
format.
Statement of Originality
I certify that this report contains work carried out by myself except where otherwise acknowledged.
Signed
Date: 20 October 2006
Table of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................................................... 1
2 LITERATURE REVIEW....................................................................................................................................... 2
3 THEORETICAL BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................... 6
3.1 SOLAR RADIATION............................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 SCATTERING..................................................................................................................................................... 7 3.3 MIE SCATTERING ............................................................................................................................................. 8
3.3.1 Theoretical formalism................................................................................................................................. 8 3.3.2 Mie Computation ........................................................................................................................................ 9
3.4 THE ROLE OF RELATIVE HUMIDITY ................................................................................................................. 10 3.5 ATMOSPHERIC AEROSOLS ............................................................................................................................... 11
3.5.1 Sources and production methods .............................................................................................................. 11 3.5.2 Size Distributions...................................................................................................................................... 12 3.5.3 Vertical Distributions................................................................................................................................ 13
4 MODELLING AND DATA ANALYSIS............................................................................................................. 14
4.1 CIRCUMSOLAR CALCULATIONS FROM MICROPHYSICAL PROPERTIES .............................................................. 14 4.1.1 Limitations and assumptions..................................................................................................................... 16
4.2 ANALYSIS OF AUSTRALIAN RELATIVE HUMIDITY & RADIATION DATA ......................................................... 17 4.2.1 Description of available data.................................................................................................................... 17 4.2.2 Filtering and merging............................................................................................................................... 18
4.3 COMBINING CIRCUMSOLAR MODEL WITH RELATIVE HUMIDITY & RADIATION DATA................................... 19
5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION............................................................................................................................ 20
5.1 CSR CALCULATION RESULTS.......................................................................................................................... 20 5.1.1 Results compared with previous work ...................................................................................................... 22
5.2 DATA ANALYSIS RESULTS............................................................................................................................... 23 5.3 COMBINING LOCATION DATA WITH THE CIRCUMSOLAR MODEL...................................................................... 26
5.3.1 Comparison with previous results............................................................................................................. 30 5.4 PREDICTION OF VARIABLES ............................................................................................................................ 30
5.4.1 Relative Humidity ..................................................................................................................................... 30 5.4.2 Aerosols .................................................................................................................................................... 31
6 CONCLUSION...................................................................................................................................................... 32
6.1 SUMMARY OF WORK....................................................................................................................................... 32 6.1.1 Implications for Solar Energy................................................................................................................... 32 6.1.2 Future work .............................................................................................................................................. 33
7 REFERENCES...................................................................................................................................................... 34
8 APPENDICES ....................................................................................................................................................... 37
8.1 APPENDIX A: ADDITIONAL EQUATIONS ......................................................................................................... 37 8.1.1 Local Time to Solar Time calculation....................................................................................................... 37 8.1.2 Computation of the Mie coefficients ......................................................................................................... 37
8.2 APPENDIX C: ADDITIONAL FIGURES............................................................................................................... 39
1
1 Introduction
Two of the key issues facing the world today are energy supply and climate change (IPCC Third
Assessment Report, 2001). The historical and current over reliance on fossil fuels and their
associated carbon emissions are the primary cause of anthropogenically induced climate change. As
a result numerous alternative sources of energy are being increasingly deployed or are in
development in an attempt to reduce carbon emissions and consequently slow or halt the progress of
climate change. Even without the pressing issue of climate change, the finite nature of fossil fuels
means that a shift to sustainable energy sources in inevitable in the long term. Two of the promising
long term candidates are wind and solar, with wind already established as a mature industry in
many countries already. Solar energy has yet to make a significant contribution to global energy
production, however due to the massive solar resource it has the potential to become a fundamental
component in the future. Both of these technologies are dependent on local weather conditions at
the site where they are deployed, thus the suitability of a region or location requires prediction of
the solar or wind resource over the estimated life of the installation. It therefore becomes necessary
to consider the reciprocal relationship between energy supply and climate change in that changing
localized weather induced by climate change may alter the energy supply derived from solar and
wind based renewables. As yet this relationship has not been considered in detail however the
implications for the wind industry are starting to be recognized (Hewer, 2006).
Concentrating Solar Thermal (CST) systems, as opposed to photovoltaic systems, have the potential
to provide large scale electricity generation in locations with high insolation such as many parts of
Australia (Carpenter, Kemp, Robillard, & Whittaker, 1999). A variety of designs have been built or
are in the design stages; however the technology and industry needs to mature before large scale
investment and deployment is possible (Quaschning, 2004; Sims, 2004). CST systems exhibit two
important characteristics uniquely relating their performance to local weather. Firstly CST systems
radiate heat from their absorbers setting an operational flux threshold on the incident radiation
below which they do not function. Secondly due to the optics of the concentration only light
incident with a specific angular range reaches the absorber. As a result CST systems can only
harness the radiation from the sun’s direct beam and the diffuse radiation in a small angular range
around it. This radiation is significantly stronger than diffuse radiation at other directions due to its
production method, scattering by atmospheric aerosols, having a strong forward scattering bias.
Relative humidity, a meteorological parameter which has the potential to be modified by climate
change, can significantly alter atmospheric aerosol size distributions and consequently their
scattering characteristics. This report is an attempt to investigate the relationship between
circumsolar radiation and relative humidity in the context of CST systems.
2
2 Literature Review
Not a great amount of attention has been paid to the possibility of the insolation arriving at a
potential CST site changing despite the fact that long term behaviour of direct insolation is not well
understood (Lohmann, Schillings, Mayer, & Meyer, 2006). Volcanic eruptions have been shown to
reduce annual productivity of CST installations by 30% (Michalsky, Perez, Seals, & Ineichen,
1994) further emphasizing the sensitivity of such systems to atmospheric changes. CST designs
have calculated to be economically viable in regions which receive direct insolation above
1700kWh/m2/year (Carpenter et al., 1999). Reductions in this value may cause a previously
economically viable system to be rendered unsustainable, underscoring the need for accurate
predictions of solar radiation.
Terrestrial solar radiation is typically broken up into a direct beam and a diffuse component. The
diffuse component is radiation which arrives at a surface having undergone any process in the
atmosphere which modifies its original vector, whereas the direct beam has not suffered any such
modification. CST systems are often assumed to only utilize the direct beam due to their
concentrating optics. This is not strictly true as many designs have angular acceptance angles
substantially larger than the angular size of the solar disc (Rabl & Bendt, 1982). The situation is
further complicated by the fact that the apparatus most commonly employed to measure the direct
beam, the Normal Incidence Pyrheliometer (NIP), has an acceptance half angle of 2.5º which is ten
times that of the angular size of the sun (Jeys & Vant-Hull, 1976). This results in an overestimation
of the true direct beam due to the capture of a portion of the diffuse component surrounding the
solar disc by the NIP. Were the diffuse radiation evenly distributed across the sky this would only
produce a minor error in measurement. Uniformity in diffuse radiation is known not to be the case
and the region surrounding the solar disc contains significantly more intense radiation than the rest
of the sky. This region – which is typically defined to extend from the edge of the solar disc
(~0.25º) to the angular limit of a NIP (typically 2.5º-3.5º) – is referred to as the aureole and the
radiation contained therein as circumsolar radiation.
The primary cause of the increased intensity in the region of the aureole is the scattering of part of
the direct beam by aerosol particles. When the scattering particle is larger than the wavelength of
the incident light, the interaction can be treated with Mie theory (Bohren & Huffman., 1998). The
scattered radiation under this regime is heavily biased in the forward direction with the specific
distribution being determined by the size and refractive index of the particle in question and the
wavelength of the incident light.
3
The ratio of the circumsolar flux,c
Φ , to the circumsolar and direct beam flux, b
Φ , is a useful
parameter often employed when dealing with circumsolar radiation and referred to as the
circumsolar ratio (CSR)
c
b c
χΦ
=Φ + Φ
(2.1.1)
The first major empirical investigation into circumsolar radiation was performed by a team from the
Lawrence Berkeley National laboratories. Custom equipment recorded the angular distribution of
solar profiles between 1976 and 1981 at various sites in the United States (Noring, Grether, & Hunt,
1991). The data obtained is referred to at the Lawrence Berkeley Reduced Data Base (RDB) due to
the exclusion of certain profiles after data quality control procedures. The LRRDB has formed the
basis for numerous examinations of circumsolar radiation and its impact on CST systems. One of
the first and most general was an analysis by Rabl & Bendt (1982). From the LBRDB they
generated a standard synthetic brightness distribution and proposed a model which would determine
the long term effect of circumsolar radiation on a CST system given the site’s average circumsolar
ratio. Buie (2003) conducted further analysis of the LBRDB and proposed a more detailed empirical
model of the angular brightness distribution and similarly only required as input the average
circumsolar ratio from a particular site.
Investigations into the performance effects of circumsolar radiation on specific CSP systems have
been found them to be significant. Schubnell (1992b) for example concluded that excluding
circumsolar radiation resulted in a 10% reduction in mean concentration ratio of a parabolic
concentrator at the Paul Scherrer Institute. Buie & Monger (2004) explored the effects of
circumsolar radiation on a line axis Fresnel CST system and reveal them to be significant for a
depending on the location’s average CSR values, with a range between 0.02 and 0.2 considered.
Such high CSR values are not necessarily relevant when the threshold of the CST system included.
Rabl & Bendt's (1982) analysis of the LBRDB data showed that for the majority of locations
considering a threshold insolation value of 500W.m-2
, the average monthly circumsolar ratio was
typically between 0.01 and 0.03.
The work of Rabl & Bendt (1982) and Buie (2003) provides a valuable tool to optimize the design
of a CST system at a given site by requiring only measurements of the circumsolar ratio, which is
much simpler to obtain than direct measurement of angular solar distribution profiles. The empirical
4
nature of the studies however did not allow for the investigation into the effects that variation of
aerosol composition and distributions would have.
An early model which allowed the simulation of circumsolar radiation was developed by Thomalla,
Kopke, Muller, & Quenzel (1983). The formalism allowed the circumsolar radiation to be
calculated from supplied aerosol optical depths, which is useful for locations were detailed aerosol
optical data exist. Another model was developed by Monger (1996) which allowed the CSR to be
calculated for a given location. The results of a simulation of the average CSR behaviour in Sydney
agreed with empirical data from climatically similar sites in the LRRDB with an average CSR value
of 0.07. In order to estimate aerosol size distributions, the model employed the average monthly
relative humidity which combined with historical records of visual range was used to infer an
aerosol size distribution described by the modified gamma distribution. While the modified gamma
distribution can be fitted well to observed aerosol populations its parameters lack physical meaning
(d'Almeida, Koepke, & Shettle, 1991). The use of average monthly relative humidity may be
problematic as the relative humidity variation from day to day can be substantial. By relying on
historical visibility data, this method suffers from the lack of ability to generalize to a location
where such data are not available. Using visibility to indirectly infer aerosol size distributions may
also suffer from the subjective nature of such measurements. Due to the reliance on site specific
data both of these models do not facilitate more general simulations or variations to specific
parameters of an aerosol model.
A more generic model does exist in the form of the Simple Model of Atmospheric Radiative
Transfer (SMARTS2) (Gueymard, 2001). This software package allows a variety of atmospheric
input parameters to be specified providing a comprehensive tool for a various of applications
involving atmospheric radiative transfer. The SMARTS2 model was compared with other available
simple - as well as more rigorous - radiative transfer models and claimed to be one of the most
accurate (Gueymard, 2003a, 2003b). SMARTS2 incorporates atmospheric aerosols by employing
one of Shettle & Fenn's (1979) standard aerosol models. The CSR’s generated by using this model
are much smaller than values quoted and considered by other authors. Even for aerosol optical
depths up to 0.5 the CSR value produced using the rural aerosol model was below 0.01. Previous
work by the author investigating atmospheric turbidity in Canada reported small average calculated
circumsolar corrections of the order 0.005 (Gueymard & Garrison, 1998). Commenting on the
markedly smaller values obtained compared with analyses of the LBRDB and Monger's (1996)
calculations, the authors suggest that the higher CSR values are not representative of clear sky
conditions and were most likely contaminated by thin cloud. This dichotomy of opinion regarding
5
CSR values suggests that there is a substantial difference in the analytical and computational
techniques involved. As a result of this discrepancy, the use of the SMARTS2 model for
investigating circumsolar radiation is limited.
Investigations into circumsolar radiation have also been conducted with the opposite objective;
using measured values to infer information about the aerosol properties. Box, Lo, & McKellar
(1977) examined the possibility of determining atmospheric turbidity from CSR but found it
necessary to know the aerosol particle size distributions.
Prior work has established the strong effect relative humidity has on atmospheric aerosols. Hanel &
Zankl (1979) provided one of the first simple models for the effect. This work was incorporated by
Shettle & Fenn (1979) to provide one of the first relatively comprehensive standard models of
tropospheric aerosols. The model and data were refined and added to by d'Almeida et al. (1991) and
then again by Hess, Koepke, & Schult (1998) who made the latest data available electronically.
Empirical field studies which have investigated relative humidity and its effects on atmospheric
aerosols have shown the rapid increase in radius for relative humidity values beyond 70% (Day,
Malm, & Kreidenweis, 2000) with similar effects being found at other locations (Fitzgerald,
Hoppel, & Vietti, 1982; Randriamiarisoa et al., 2006). Simulations using standard aerosol models
have also produced results which are in agreement (Kay & Box, 2000). The Hanel & Zankl (1979)
model does not take into account the hysteresis effect of aerosol growth and shrinkage under
changing relative humidity conditions that has been experimentally observed (Randriamiarisoa et
al., 2006).
Aerosol compositions themselves are of course the primary cause of circumsolar radiation however
due to their short lifetime, long term forecasts are difficult and can change rapidly (Twomey, 1977).
Relative humidity which is the most important external factor in altering existing atmospheric
aerosol’s optical characteristics is a much more stable and irreversible – if not well understood –
factor. Long term relative humidity data is sparse (IPCC Third Assessment Report, 2001) and in
some cases older equipment has been unreliable on a large scale (Wijngaarden & Vincent, 2005);
however localized increasing trends have been observed (Power & Goyal, 2003) in some locations.
The majority of general circulation climate models produce results indicating increasing absolute
humidity while marinating constant relative humidity (Pierrehumbert, Brogniez, & Roca, 2005).
6
3 Theoretical Background
Before discussing the design and implementation of a circumsolar model, it is necessary to briefly
outline some of the theoretical concepts employed.
3.1 Solar radiation
Emission of radiation by the sun approximates that of an ideal blackbody at an effective
temperature of between 5600K and 6300K (Thomas & Stamnes, 1999). The intensity of the this
radiation at the top of the earth’s atmosphere is referred to as the solar constant despite the actual
value varying by 3.3%± due to orbital eccentricity. Estimates of mean values have differed by a
few 2/W m , with 2
0 1368 .I W m−= being a typical value (Gueymard, 2001). Rabl (1985) points out
that the range of estimates is an order of magnitude smaller than the typical uncertainties of
terrestrial insolation data. This is due to the variety and variability of modifications which are made
to incoming radiation as it traverses the atmosphere.
From radiative transfer theory light traversing a medium may be attenuated by two processes:
scattering and absorption. In the case of absorption the incident energy is removed and usually
translated into kinetic energy. Scattering on the other hand removes energy from the original path
but then re-radiates it, typically at an angle distinct from the original direction of propagation.
Treatment of radiative transfer in the earth’s atmosphere frequently approximates it as plane parallel
which is sufficiently accurate unless large solar zenith angles are considered.
The intensity of radiation after traversing the plane parallel atmosphere is described by the Beer-
Lambert-Bouguer law:
( ) ( )0 exp ( )I I m αα
λ λ τ λ
= − ∑ (3.1.1)
where 0I is the intensity at a particular wavelength at the top of the atmosphere, I is the intensity
after traversing the atmosphere, m is the relative airmass and ατ the optical depth due to a particular
atmospheric process α . In the plane parallel or slab approximation, the optical depths, ατ are
defined for light incident perpendicular to a slab of atmosphere (when the sun is at a local zenith).
For cases other than this, there is the need to incorporate the increased path length traversed; this is
achieved by employing the relative airmass, m. Geometrically the relative airmass correction is
simply the secant of the zenith angle, however at increasingly large zenith angles, the plane parallel
approximation breaks down and a correction factor is introduced to the relative airmass
7
( )( )
1
1.253
0.15cos
93.885m φ φ
φ
−
= + −
(3.1.2)
where φ is the solar zenith angle in degrees.
The different optical depth terms in (3.1.1) are due to a number of processes which may be grouped
according to the class of process they represent. Broadly they can be grouped as follows
0 R g aτ τ τ τ= + + (3.1.3)
where R
τ is due to Rayleigh scattering (primarily due to molecular oxygen and nitrogen), g
τ is due
to all gaseous absorption and a
τ due to aerosol absorption and scattering ( , ,a a abs a scatτ τ τ= + ).
In situations where the aerosol optical depth is small, it is possible to determine the intensity and
angular distribution of scattered radiation by employing the single scattering approximation. This
approximation is achieved by expanding (3.1.1) to first order. Neglecting the contribution of
Rayleigh scattering this can be written as
( )0 0exp( )s a a
I I m mF pτ τ θ= − (3.1.4)
where 0τ is the total optical depth, a
F the effectiveness factor and ( )p θ the phase function. The
phase function defines the angular distribution relative to the original direction of propagation. The
effectiveness factor which describes the altitude dependence can be set to unity to remove the
dependence. This simplification has been shown to be acceptable for calculations where θ is small
(Box et al., 1977)
3.2 Scattering
Both scattering and absorption will attenuate incident light and thus will be relevant to the
determination of the intensity and spectral composition of light arriving at the earth’s surface.
Scattering processes however will re-introduce the light they removed from the original beam and
this will contribute – to some extent - to the resultant radiation received at the surface.
Scattering of light in the atmosphere often assumes the scattering particles are homogenous spheres
which is typically not true however it is possible to assign a non-spherical scatterer an effective
radius. The use of effective scattering spheres is sufficiently accurate for scattering in close to the
forward direction but becomes less accurate at larger scattering angles (Bohren & Huffman., 1998).
8
Scattering by homogenous spheres is divided into two distinct regimes: situations where the
scatterer is larger than the wavelength of the incident light and those where it is smaller. The former
(and more fundamental) conditions require solving the electromagnetic equations for a sphere.
While this is a complex task it has been rigorously explored by a number of authors including
Gustav Mie whose name is synonymous with the type of scattering. In the latter case
approximations and simplifications can be made to the Mie solution and this regime is referred to as
Rayleigh scattering. Rayleigh scattering is typically isotropic and therefore only a small amount of
scattered radiation delivered close to the original direction of propagation. As a result Rayleigh
scattering has been neglected as a contributor to the circumsolar radiation. In contrast to Rayleigh
scattering, Mie scattering is not isotropic and typically has a strong forward bias.
3.3 Mie Scattering
3.3.1 Theoretical formalism
As previously alluded to, obtaining a solution in the Mie regime it is necessary to solve Maxwell’s
equations in a sphere. Inclusion of a full derivation is to lengthy to include here, however a brief
summary of the relevant equations is provided and the reader is referred to Bohren & Huffman
(1998) for a complete treatment.
Three key parameters obtained from a Mie calculation are: the scattering cross section, the
extinction cross section and the phase function. The scattering and extinction cross sections are
larger than the geometric cross section and the ratio of the two defines the scattering or extinction
efficiency 2
, , /e s e sQ C rπ= . The extinction cross section is the sum of the scattering and absorption
coefficientse s a
C C C= + . The scattering cross section is given by
( )( )2 2
21
22 1s n n
n
C n a bk
π ∞
=
= + +∑ (3.3.1)
where / 2 /k cω π λ= = is the angular wavenumber. The extinction cross section, which is the sum
of the scattering cross section and absorption cross section, is given by
( ) ( )2
1
22 1 Ree n n
n
C n a bk
π ∞
=
= + +∑ (3.3.2)
In both preceding equations n
a and n
b are the scattering coefficients defined by
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
' ' ' '
' ' ' '
n n n n n n n n
n n
n n n n n n n n
m mx x x mx mx x m x mxa b
m mx x x mx mx x m x mx
ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ ψ
ψ ξ ξ ψ ψ ξ ξ ψ
− −= =
− − (3.3.3)
9
where /p s
m m m= the ratio between the refractive index of the scattering particle and the medium is
located in, n
ψ and n
ξ are the Ricatti-Bessel functions and x is referred to as the size parameter and
is given by
2 /x rπ λ= (3.3.4)
where 0 /p
mλ λ= is the wavelength inside the scattering particle.
The angular distribution of the scattered radiation which is referred to as the phase function
( ) ( )2 211 22
p S Sθ = + (3.3.5)
where 1S and 2S are the scattering amplitudes
( )
( )( )
( )( )
( )1 2
1 1
2 1 2 1
1 1n n n n n n n n
n n
n nS a b S a b
n n n nπ τ τ π
∞ ∞
= =
+ += + = +
+ +∑ ∑ (3.3.6)
where n
a and n
b are same scattering coefficients defined in (3.3.3) and n
π and n
τ are the angle
dependent functions given by
( )( )
( )( )1 1
sin
n n
n n
P dP
d
θ θπ θ τ θ
θ θ= = (3.3.7)
where ( )1
nP θ is the associated Legendre polynomial.
3.3.2 Mie Computation
From the preceding equations is evident that computation of the scattering and extinction cross
sections and the phase function requires (3.3.3) and (3.3.7) to be determined. Both of these can be
calculated using their recursive properties. Upwards recursion of the angle dependent functions
(3.3.7) is stable and straightforward. Calculation of the scattering coefficients (3.3.3) to sufficient
accuracy can require a large number of terms and may introduce error. One of the common methods
is the utilization of a logarithmic derivative described in Bohren & Huffman (1998) and briefly
outlined in Appendix A. Although the theory is well established, alternative techniques to improve
accuracy or reduce computational time continue to be investigated (Du, 2004). Figure 3.1 shows the
result of some typical Mie calculations performed using a MATLAB implementation of Bohren &
Huffman's (1998) algorithm.
10
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 18010
-8
10-6
10-4
10-2
100
102
104
Scattering Angle [Degrees]
Inte
nsity [
arb
. units]
r=1.0 [µm] n=1.5+0.01i lamda=0.4[µm]
r=1.5 [µm] n=1.6+0.1i lamda=0.4[µm]
r=4.0 [µm] n=1.5+0.1i lamda=0.5[µm]
r=1.0 [µm] n=1.5+0.1i lamda=0.4[µm]
r=2.0 [µm] n=1.5+0.1i lamda=0.4[µm]
r=3.0 [µm] n=1.5+0.1i lamda=0.4[µm]
Figure 3.1 Example of an angular dependent scattering plot produced by the MATLAB code for six different
parameter sets with 300 steps between 0º-30º and 150 steps between 30º-180º.
3.4 The role of relative humidity
Relative humidity is defined (Bohren & Albrecht, 1998) for a given temperature as the ratio of
vapour pressure, e, to the saturation vapour pressure, es, (of vapour in equilibrium with a flat surface
of water) expressed as a percentage
( )/ 100%sf e e= (3.4.1)
The composition of the aerosol will determine how it reacts to changes in relative humidity.
Hydrophobic particles are not affected by relative humidity while those that are hygroscopic can
respond either in a monotonic or deliquescent manner. In addition hysteresis effects have been
observed for certain aerosol types (Randriamiarisoa et al., 2006). Such effects are not considered in
this work
For hygroscopic aerosols increasing relative humidity has a twofold effect; increasing its radius and
modifying its refractive index. The exact nature of the relationship between relative humidity and a
particular scattering particle depends its composition and has to be determined experimentally.
11
Results from a variety of studies and the functional relationships exhibited were integrated by Hanel
& Zankl (1979). The relationship between the radius of a particle and relative humidity is
( )( )
1/ 3
0
0
1w w
w
m ar a r
mρ
= +
(3.4.2)
where ρ is the particle density relative to water, ( )wm a is the mass of condensed water, 0m is the
dry mass of the particle and w
a the water activity which is the relative humidity corrected for the
curvature of the particle surface
2
exp Ww
W
Va f
R Tr
σ −=
(3.4.3)
where σ is the surface tension, W
V is the specific volume of water, W
R the specific gas constant for
water and T the absolute temperature.
Using the modified radius, the effective complex refractive index is determined by a volume
weighted average of the refractive indices of the dry particle material, 0n , and that of water, w
n
( )3
00
( )w w
w
rn n n n
r a
= + −
(3.4.4)
3.5 Atmospheric aerosols
As has been established in section 3.3, given the effective radius and refractive index of a sphere it
is possible to calculate its optical characteristics at a particular wavelength. Equipped with this
calculation tool it is then possible to determine the scattering characteristics of atmospheric aerosols
provided that their composition and size distributions are adequately described.
3.5.1 Sources and production methods
Atmospheric aerosols come from a variety of sources and production methods. The production
source will determine the chemical composition of the aerosol and as such the refractive index and
interaction properties with water vapour. It is the production mechanism which generally
determines the size distribution and number densities (d'Almeida et al., 1991).
12
Once aerosols have been produced they have finite residence times, which depend on a number of
factors. The production intensity and the rate at which the aerosols are removed will give rise to the
ambient aerosol conditions. In order to perform meaningful calculations which represent the
aerosols in the atmosphere a sufficient method to describe the size distribution of a particular
particle species is required.
3.5.2 Size Distributions
Atmospheric aerosols span a wide range of sizes, the distribution of which is crucial in describing
the bulk optical properties. Various methods have been employed in an attempt to characterize
aerosol size distributions. Three such models are the Junge power-law, modified gamma
distribution and the log-normal distribution. While the Junge power-law and modified gamma
distributions can be fitted to measured distributions the log-normal distribution is the most
appropriate choice when using an aerosol model consisting of distinct components each with
differing distributions (d'Almeida et al., 1991). The log-normal distribution is described by:
( )
( )
2
2
log log( )exp
(log ) 2 log( ) 2 log
iMi i
i i
r rdN r N
d r π σ σ
− = −
(3.5.1)
Where M
r is the modal radius, logi
σ is the standard deviation of log r . Using this description ,
distributions of particles from different sources, i, can be combined to give a total distribution:
( ) ( )
(log ) (log )
i
i
dN r dN r
d r d r=∑ (3.5.2)
Figure 3.2 illustrates the different log-normal size distributions of some of the standard components
for both 50% and 95% relative humidity. It should be noted that as the relative humidity increases,
it shifts the modal radius without modifying the spread of the distribution.
13
10-2
10-1
100
101
102
10-20
10-15
10-10
10-5
100
radius [µm]
Norm
aliz
ed N
um
ber
density d
N/d
log(r
) [c
m-3
]
Soot
Sea Salt (acc., 50% RH)
Sea Salt (acc., 95% RH)
Sea Salt (coa., 50% RH)
Sea Salt (coa., 95% RH)
Sulfate 50%
Sulfate 95%
Water Soluble 50%
Water Soluble 95%
Figure 3.2 A selection of some of the size distributions described by (d'Almeida, Koepke, & Shettle, 1991)
3.5.3 Vertical Distributions
In addition to describing the size distribution of aerosols, a description of how their total number
density varies with height is also required. The model employed describes the vertical total number
density of aerosols as decreasing exponentially with height.
( )( ) (0)exp /N h N h Z= − (3.5.3)
where N(0) is the number density at ground level, h is the height above ground and Z is a scale
height. It is also assumed that the size distribution of aerosols does not itself vary with height.
14
4 Modelling and data analysis
Three separate steps were undertaken to examine the effect of relative humidity on circumsolar
radiation. Firstly a model which allows the circumsolar flux to be calculated from microphysical
properties was constructed. Secondly relative humidity and radiation data were obtained for
geographic variety of Australian locations then suitably manipulated and analysed. Finally the
microphysical model was used in conjunction with the obtained data to simulate localized
circumsolar behaviour.
4.1 Circumsolar calculations from microphysical properties
Determining the scattered flux in an angular range requires both a theoretical framework to describe
atmospheric aerosols and data to describe specific models. One of the first models providing both
the framework and relevant data was developed by Shettle & Fenn (1979). Further refinement and
additions were made by d'Almeida et al. (1991) and then again by Hess et al. (1998) in the form of
the Global Aerosol Data Set (GADS). By utilizing the framework and data provided by the most
recent of the above mentioned works it was possible to develop a model to perform circumsolar
calculations for a variety of atmospheric aerosol conditions.
MATLAB was the environment used to construct the model due to the modular flexibility, useful
included functions and advanced graphing tools. The variety of calculation steps were broken up
into discrete functions with a various of driver scripts used to call relevant functions with the
appropriate parameters and if required plot the results.
Firstly a set of functions to perform Mie calculations and return the scattering coefficients and
phase function were written. These were based on the
Fortran code of Bohren & Albrecht (1998) and Box
(2004). The result of some single calculations
performed using this code is illustrated in Figure 3.1.
In the GADS each aerosol component is defined in
terms of its wavelength dependent refractive index and
its size distribution, using the log-normal description,
for a range of relative humilities. The effects of
relative humidity on size distribution was achieved
Table 4.1 Primary aerosol models employed as
input with their components and associated
mixing ratios.
Name Component Mixing Ratio
Continental
Clean
Insoluble
Water Soluble
1.00
5.77E-5
Desert Water Soluble
Mineral (Nuc.)
Mineral (Acc.)
Mineral (Coa.)
8.70E-1
1.17E-1
1.33E-2
6.17E-5
Maritime
Clean
Water Soluble
Sea Salt (Acc.)
Sea Salt (Coa.)
9.87E-1
1.32E-2
2.11E-6
15
using the Hanel & Zankl (1979) method
described in section 3.4. This allows Mie
calculations to be performed for each
wavelength and across the size range.
Subsequent integration over the size
distribution produces the extinction and
scattering coefficients and the phase function.
These values are then normalized to 1 particle
per cm3 so that they can be multiplied by a
specific number density to retrieve the
corresponding coefficients and phase functions.
The results of Mie calculations to high accuracy
were available for the aerosol components
described by the GADS alleviating the need
perform them for the standard component size
distributions.
Aerosol models are then defined by their
relative number mixing ratios which allow the
constituent components to be appropriately
weighted and combined. The primary models
employed, their components and corresponding
number mixing ratios are shown in Table 4.1.
Using the exponentially decreasing number
density model described in equation (3.5.3) the
aerosol optical depth and aerosol scattering
optical depth are found by integrating the
corresponding optical coefficients over the
height distribution.
The scattered intensity was then calculated using the single scattering approximation described by
equation (3.1.4) provided a total optical depth and extraterrestrial spectrum are available. The
extraterrestrial spectrum as well as gas and Rayleigh optical depths were generated from the
SMARTS2 model using a standard atmosphere with no aerosols. The water vapour optical depth
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
Wavelength [µm]
Irra
dia
nc
e [
kW
.m-2
. µm
- 1]
Extraterrestrial spectrum
Blackbody @ 5600 K
Terrestrial spectrum
Figure 4.1 The SMARTS2 generated extraterrestrial
spectrum, a blackbody emission profile and the terrestrial
spectrum after attenuation due to gaseous processes.
Relative Humidity %
Airm
ass
50 60 70 80 90
1
2
3
4
5
6 500
600
700
800
900
1000
Figure 4.2 The DNI without aerosols as a function of
relative humidity and relative airmass using a standard
atmosphere at a constant temperature of 27º
16
was calculated for a range of relative humidity values with the surface temperature fixed at a
reference value of 27ºC. The extraterrestrial spectrum, terrestrial spectrum (after gaseous extinction)
and reference blackbody curve are show in Figure 4.1. The decrease in DNI solely due to gaseous
extinction values used as a function of relative humidity and relative airmass is shown in Figure 4.2
For a given relative airmass, the resultant scattered radiation was calculated. Combining this with
the phase function and integrating over the angular range from the solar disc to the edge of the
aureole the magnitude of the circumsolar radiation was calculated.
4.1.1 Limitations and assumptions
This model contains some important limitations and assumptions: the GADS models and size
distributions are average values and not necessarily representative of local conditions and the single
scattering approximation is typically only valid for optical depths in the order of 0.4 (Box &
Deepak, 1978).
The MATLAB m files which constitute this model are available online from
http://www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~dscott/csr/
17
4.2 Analysis of Australian Relative Humidity & Radiation Data
Relative humidity and solar radiation data were obtained from the Australian Bureau of
Meteorology for nine of their recording stations: Alice Springs, Broome, Darwin, Geraldton,
Learmonth, Mildura, Rockhampton, Tennant Creek and Wagga Wagga. The locations and average
daily number of sunshine hours of the nine stations are shown in Figure 4.3
Figure 4.3 Annual average sunshine hours from the Bureau of Meteorology and the location of stations where
relative humidity data was obtained.
The choice of stations was primarily determined by those where half hourly direct normal insolation
data were available. The nine locations are also geographically distinct and are subject to differing
weather patterns making for a good cross section of conditions.
4.2.1 Description of available data
The relative humidity data consisted of two measurements per day taken at 09:00 and 15:00 (local
time) and were available as far back as at least 1976 for all sites and further for others.
Detailed solar radiation measurements began in 1999 for all stations except Darwin which began in
recording in 2001. The direct normal insolation was measured by a pyrheliometer mounted on a
solar tracker with an acceptance half angle of 2.5º. Direct radiation data were supplied in MJ.m-2
for
18
a half hour period, with the end of the period specified in local solar time. In addition to the half
hourly data, the total daily direct energy was supplied.
There were gaps in both the relative humidity and radiation data due to a variety of causes, from
equipment malfunctions to maintenance.
4.2.2 Filtering and merging
It was assumed that the direct energy delivered over each half an hour was constant allowing the
instantaneous DNI value to be retrieved. This assumption may be contaminated due to transient
cloud cover and during mornings and evenings when the DNI value changes rapidly. In order to
compare direct radiation and relative humidity it was necessary to match solar time to local time
and select the closest half hour DNI value. For sites in states where daylight saving is observed
(Mildura and Wagga Wagga) this had to be corrected for. Then using the coordinates of each site,
the local time was converted to solar time using the algorithm of Rabl (1985), which is included in
Appendix A, and the closest matching DNI value was selected.
Utilizing the 9am relative humidity measurement presents some problems. As the measurement is
taken at 9am local time this will shift significantly closer to dawn and as such the corresponding
DNI measurement will experience a much larger relative airmass. The 3pm measurement, while
also experiencing variations in comparison to solar time over the course of the year will tend to be
more stable as the corresponding relative airmass variation is smaller. To illustrate; the relative
airmass corresponding to the morning measurement at Mildura ranged between 1.5 and 4.3 over the
course of the year compared with 1.1 and 2.6 for the afternoon measurement. The variation was
smaller at the sites which did not employ daylight savings. Calculations were therefore conducted
primarily using the 3pm reading.
The relative airmass corresponding to the two daily measurements at 09:00 and 15:00 local time
was calculated and added to the data. This was achieved by employing a MATLAB implementation
of the PSA algorithm (Blanco-Muriel, Alarcon-Padilla, Lopez-Moratalla, & Lara-Coira, 2001) for
calculating the solar vector and equation (3.1.2) to retrieve the corresponding relative airmass.
19
4.3 Combining Circumsolar Model with Relative Humidity & Radiation Data
The circumsolar model section 4.1 was adapted to allow the DNI, relative humidity and relative
airmass data from a particular site to be used as part of the input parameters to calculate the CSR,
the circumsolar intensity and the true beam intensity. The circumsolar model also requires an
aerosol model, total number density and gaseous optical depths to perform the calculations. The
choice of aerosol model could be arbitrarily selected and was typically selected dictated based on
the geographic location with a range of total number densities explored. This is an important
assumption as most locations will experience variation in aerosol loading which will likely result in
an overestimate of circumsolar radiation at high DNI as such measurements may correspond to low
aerosol loads. The gaseous optical depths were fixed using the standard atmosphere described in
section 4.1 with the exception of the water vapour which varied according to the measured relative
humidity and a reference temperature of 27ºC. This approximation will also introduce error as
gaseous optical depths can vary depending on location and time of year and the water vapour
present will depend on the site temperature. This simplification; however will still serve to
characterize the energy distribution of the solar spectrum after gaseous extinction.
As calculations were performed for a single time each day, the results are not necessarily
representative for the entire day.
A driver was written to perform the above integration with the inclusion of the ability calculate
include operational thresholds and to calculate average CSR, average power loss due to exclusion of
the circumsolar radiation.
20
5 Results and Discussion
5.1 CSR calculation results
The angular distribution of circumsolar radiation within the aureole is particularly relevant to CST
systems with acceptance half angles within the 0.25º to 2.5º range due to the typical acceptance half
angle of a NIP, therefore this angular range was considered. Figure 5.1 illustrates the nature of this
angular distribution and its variation depending on the aerosol model employed at a relative
humidity value of 50%. The maritime clean model exhibits the flattest distribution, followed by the
continental and urban models which have similar water soluble to insoluble component mixing
ratios. The desert model yields the most extreme variation across the aureole largely due to the
amount of large particles it contains.
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.50
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
0.07
0.08
0.09
Scattering Angle [degrees]
I s/I
b [
Sr-1
]
Continental Clean (2600cm-3) CSR:0.009 Ib 897W.m-2
Continental Average (15300cm-3) CSR:0.023 Ib 841W.m-2
Continental Polluted (50000cm-3) CSR:0.040 Ib 738W.m-2
Urban (158000cm-3) CSR:0.080 Ib 579W.m-2
Desert (1400cm-3) CSR:0.078 Ib 754W.m-2
Maritime clean (1520cm-3) CSR:0.021 Ib 865W.m-2
Figure 5.1 The angular distribution of intensity within the aureole and corresponding CSR values for six
standard models at typical number densities. Relative airmass and relative humidity are constant across models
at 1.5 and 50% respectively.
The shape of the aureole angular profile is markedly different between models when the relative
humidity is varied. This can clearly be seen in Figure 5.2 where a distinct difference between the
how the angular profile differs under increasing relative humidity for the continental clean and
maritime clean models is evident. As the relative humidity is increased the clean continental model
flattens its circumsolar distribution, whereas the maritime clean model shifts its distribution closer
to the small angle range. This difference can be explained by the differing dominant hygroscopic
component in each model. In the continental clean model the hygroscopic component is the generic
water soluble type with a dry modal radius of 0.021 mµ ; much smaller than the shortest wavelengths
21
of the solar spectrum. As a result a majority of
these particles will act as Rayleigh scatterers. As
the relative humidity is increased, the modal radius
is increased leading to more particles acting as Mie
scatterers. These particles that have transitioned
from Rayleigh to Mie scatterers will still be in the
lower Mie regime size limit and thus the forward
bias will not be as strong as larger Mie scatterers.
In contrast the maritime clean model has two
hygroscopic components, both with modal radii
larger than the minimum solar spectrum
wavelength. An increase in modal radius will
therefore increase the size of the majority of
particles already acting as Mie scatterers resulting
in a stronger forward bias. The desert model
exhibits only a small variation in its aureole
distribution due its largely insoluble composition
Figure 5.3 illustrates the behaviour of the
calculated CSR for the continental clean, maritime
clean and desert models as a function of total
number density and relative humidity. The
continental clean model exhibits a broader
dependence on relative humidity than the sharp
increase exhibited by the maritime model at high
relative humidity values. The desert model shows
only a minor dependence on relative humidity again due to its small hygroscopic component. The
CSR values for both the continental clean and maritime clean remain relatively small even as the
total number density is increased, provided that the relative humidity is below 70%. In contrast the
CSR value rapidly increases with number density in the case of the desert model.
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.510
-3
10-2
10-1
I s/I
b [
Sr-1
]
(a) Continental Clean
50%RH70%RH80%RH
90%RH95%RH98%RH99%RH
0.5 1 1.5 2 2.510
-3
10-2
10-1
100
Scattering Angle [degrees]
I s/I
b [
Sr-1
]
(b) Maritime Clean
Figure 5.2 The effect of relative humidity on the
angular distribution of aureole intensity for (a) the
continental clean model and (b) the maritime clean
model.
22
Re
lati
ve
Hu
mid
ity
[%
](a) Continental Clean
1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 600050
60
70
80
90
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
(b) Maritime Clean
1000 2000 300050
60
70
80
90
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
(c) Desert
1000 2000 300050
60
70
80
90
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
Total Number density [cm
-3]
Figure 5.3 CSR as a function of number density and relative humidity for three models (a) continental clean, (b)
maritime clean and (c) desert. Relative airmass is fixed at 1.5. Note that the CSR colour mapping is not uniform across
the figures.
5.1.1 Results compared with previous work
The SMARTS2 (Gueymard, 2001) model is a multipurpose software utility for which performs a
wide variety of calculations related to radiative transfer in the atmosphere. Early versions did not
consider circumsolar radiation however more recent revisions of the software introduce the option
to correct this. Running the model using the Shettle & Fenn (1979) rural aerosol model produces a
maximum correction due to circumsolar radiation of 1% for aerosol optical depths as high as 0.5.
Analysis of the SMARTS2 source code revealed the method of calculating the circumsolar
correction to the direct beam employed parameterized phase functions are defined for angles up to
10º by
( )2
1
a b cp
d
θ θθ
θ
+ +=
+ (5.1.1)
where a, b, c and d are constants derived from a MODTRAN simulation for particular wavelengths
and relative humidity values. SMARTS2 contains 20 sets of constants corresponding to five
wavelengths (0.3, 0.55, 0.694, 1.06 and 1.536 mµ ) and four values of relative humidity (0, 70, 80,
99 %) which select from a combination of 26 standard phase functions. Any intermediate values,
either for wavelength or relative humidity are arrived at via interpolation. While this approach may
yield usable results for the majority of applications, it would appear too coarse for an investigation
specifically into circumsolar radiation. It is thus difficult to ascertain where the discrepancy comes
in as the parameters used to run the MODTRAN results are unknown; however the strongly peaked
phase functions suggest the dominance of larger aerosols.
23
5.2 Data analysis results
Initial analyses were conducted on the relative humidity data in an attempt to detect long term
trends or patterns. Compiling annual averages over the years for which data existed for each
location produced no evidence of coherent trends. The inter-annual variability was typically in the
range of 20%, decreasing for those stations with higher average annual relative humidity values, a
plot of which is included in the appendix. Combining the monthly averages for all sites across the
years for which data were available provides a reasonable approximation of the annual relative
humidity behaviour of a particular site and is illustrated in Figure 5.4. The different sites exhibit
substantially different relative humidity profiles with Alice Springs, Learmonth, Geraldton, Mildura
and Wagga Wagga peaking in the winter months; Broome and Darwin and to a lesser extend
Tennant Creek and Rockhampton peaking in the summer months.
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Month
Rela
tive H
um
idit
y
Alice Springs
Broome
Darwin
Geraldton
Learmonth
Mildura
Rockhampton
Tennant Creek
Wagga Wagga
Figure 5.4 Historical monthly average humidity values for all stations from 1976-2005.
With respect to solar energy those regions where relative humidity is high in summer have the
greatest potential to suffer performance losses from aerosol effects associated with increased
relative humidity.
The relationship between total daily DNI energy arriving at a site was examined for all sites by
sorting the sample days by DNI magnitude and plotting the corresponding daily relative humidity
value. Plots for three contrasting sites are shown in Figure 5.5. The other sites not shown exhibited
qualitatively similar relationships.
24
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
1 89 177 265 353 441 529 617 705 793 881 969 1057 1145 1233 1321 1409 1497 1585 1673 1761 1849 1937 2025 2113 2201
Sample Day
Re
lati
ve
Hu
mid
ity
(%
)
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
To
tal
Da
ily
DN
I (M
J.m
^-2
)
Alice Springs EnergyLearmonth EnergyWagga Wagga EnergyAlice Springs Avg. RHLearmonth Avg. RHWagga Wagga Avg. RH
Figure 5.5 Daily average DNI energy for Alice Springs, Learmonth and Wagga Wagga in increasing magnitude
with corresponding relative humidity (light shading) and moving average thereof.
It is clear that an inverse relationship between DNI and relative humidity exists. The dominant
cause of this relationship is most likely the increasing cloud cover and cloud optical thickness
associated with increasing relative humidity.
While a good marker of long term trends, the total daily DNI energy does not allow for
instantaneous effects on collector performance to be assessed. As outlined earlier; many CST
systems require a minimum DNI value to operate. Therefore at times when the DNI is less than the
operational threshold of a particular system, the relative humidity is of little concern. As the
simulations in section 5.1 clearly showed, when the relative humidity increases to values above
70% the effects on aerosols and consequently the bulk scattering behaviour of the atmosphere is
significantly altered. It is therefore important to determine how likely conditions where the DNI
threshold of a CST system is met and the local relative humidity is sufficiently high to modify
scattering behaviour. The percentage of samples when the afternoon relative humidity measurement
was above a particular value and the corresponding DNI measurement was also above a threshold
value is illustrated for three contrasting sites: Wagga Wagga, Broome and Tennant Creek, and is
shown in Figure 5.6.
25
Results for all sites at two different DNI and relative
humidity thresholds are summarised in Table 5.1. It is
immediately clear that even with a low threshold of
300W.m-2
only a small percentage of the sample
measurements occurred concurrent to relative humidity
values beyond 70% .For values beyond 90%, the
majority of locations did not experience any such
conditions. For an increased threshold this pattern is
repeated with further reductions. Darwin and Learmonth
are notable exceptions with a significant percentage of
measurements above the threshold experiencing
simultaneously high relative humidity conditions.
Broome also exhibits to a lesser extent these conditions
however in contrast to Darwin and Learmonth the
fraction drops to zero for relative humidity values above
90%.
These results are significant in that they illustrate
that when considering the threshold of CST systems the
relevance of the enhanced aerosol modifications which occur above 70%RH are only applicable to a
small fraction of days per year.
Rela
tivity h
um
idity (
%)
(a)
0 200 400 600 800 10000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Rela
tivity h
um
idity (
%)
(b)
0 200 400 600 800 10000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
DNI Threshold (W.m-2)
Rela
tivity h
um
idity (
%)
(c)
0 200 400 600 800 10000
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Figure 5.6 Percentage of sample days where the
direct insolation is above a threshold value and
above a relative humidity value for (a) Wagga
Wagga (b) Broome and (c) Tennant Creek.
Table 5.1 The percentage of daily measurements when
both the 15:00 DNI and corresponding relative humidity
is greater than a threshold value.
DNI
Threshold
300 Wm-2
DNI Threshold
500 Wm-2
Location To
tal
da
ys
da
ta
70% 90% 70% 90%
Alice Springs 2290 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00
Broome 2297 5.88 0.00 4.79 0.00
Darwin 1335 4.49 0.75 3.37 0.52
Geraldton 2078 1.78 0.10 0.96 0.00
Learmonth 1860 3.44 0.65 3.33 0.65
Mildura 2233 0.76 0.00 0.54 0.00
Rockhampton 1932 0.21 0.00 0.05 0.00
Tennant Creek 2219 0.36 0.00 0.18 0.00
Wagga Wagga 2466 1.54 0.08 0.81 0.04
26
5.3 Combining location data with the circumsolar model
Application of the circumsolar model to site data was performed across all sites, using aerosol
models relevant to the particular site across a range of number densities. Figure 5.7 illustrates the
relationship between CSR and relative humidity for three sites and the difference that the inclusion
of a threshold DNI has.
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
0.03
0.035
0.04
0.045
0.05
1 501 1001 1501 2001
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
1 501 1001
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
0.002
0.004
0.006
0.008
0.01
0.012
0.014
1 501 1001 1501 2001
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
1 501 1001 1501 2001
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
0.001
0.002
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
1 501 1001 1501
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
0.06
1 501 1001
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Figure 5.7 Relative humidity and corresponding CSR for three sites both with (right hand figures) and without
(left hand figures) a 500W.m-2
threshold considered. (a) & (b) Wagga Wagga (continental clean 2600 cm-3
); (c) &
(d) Tennant Creek (continental clean 1500 cm-3
) and (e) & (f) Geraldton (maritime 1500 cm-3
)
(a) (b)
(c) (d)
(e) (f)
CS
R
CS
R
CS
R
Rela
tive H
um
idity
Rela
tive H
um
idity
Rela
tive H
um
idity
CSR RH
27
Figure 5.7 shows the expected overall increase in CSR with increasing relative humidity and a
rapid increase when relative humidity passes 70% for all of the sites. Comparing Wagga Wagga’s
profile with and without inclusion of a threshold shows the exclusion of the majority of high
relative humidity values; however a CSR increase across the relative humidity mid range is
preserved. In contrast Tenant Creek exhibits a weaker correspondence and a much greater reduction
in the average magnitude when the threshold is considered.
Figure 5.8 on the following page shows the calculated circumsolar and direct beam
intensities for three sites; Alice Springs, Mildura and Learmonth. The desert model at two different
number densities was applied to Alice Springs, the continental clean to Mildura and both maritime
clean and continental clean to Learmonth. The circumsolar intensity for Alice Springs under the
desert model tends to peak along the upper range of direct beam values. The results from Mildura
under the continental clean model exhibits some important characteristics. The direct beam intensity
increases in an approximately linear fashion with the circumsolar intensity peaking at a direct beam
value of approximately 500W.m-2
, a typical CST threshold. Noting that a system which has an
acceptance half angle close to that of the angular size of the solar disc will exclude this circumsolar
radiation the possibility exists that the exclusion will result in the radiation received being under the
system threshold rendering it inoperable. Learmonth under a maritime clean model exhibits a
relatively constant circumsolar intensity profile, corresponding to its almost flat high insolation
plateau. Applying the continental clean model to Learmonth produces similar results.
Table 5.2 summarizes the effects of considering a threshold value of 500W.m2 for all sites
employing a variety of models and differing number densities. The resultant average CSR value,
average DNI reduction between systems accepting the circumsolar radiation and those that do not
and the number of days per year where systems accepting the circumsolar radiation would be above
the threshold and those that do not below it, are shown. Employing the continental clean model for
all sites shows average CSR’s typically below 0.02 even for high number densities. With the
exception of the desert model, the maximum number of days per year where the acceptance of
circumsolar radiation would determine if the operational threshold was met was 4.1 for Darwin. The
simulations based on the desert model show elevated effects, however it is likely that the number
densities will be significantly lower than those employed over a large timescale.
It should be emphasized that these results correspond to single measurements in the
afternoon at varying local solar times (due to the relative humidity measurements being taken at
local time, as discussed previously) therefore are not necessarily representative of the entire day.
The effects of falling below the threshold are potentially more complex than simply the
cessation of system operation due to the performance degradation experienced by many CST
systems during transient conditions.
28
0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
5
10
15
20
I circum
sola
r [W
m-2
]
0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
200
400
600
800
1000
(a)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
10
20
30
40
50
60
0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
200
400
600
800
1000
I beam
[W
m-2
]
(b)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
1
2
3
4
5
6
I circum
sola
r [W
m-2
]
0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
200
400
600
800
1000
(c)
0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
2
4
6
8
10
12
0 500 1000 1500 2000 25000
200
400
600
800
1000
I beam
[W
m-2
]
(d)
0 500 1000 1500 20000
50
100
150
200
I circum
sola
r [W
m-2
]
0 500 1000 1500 20000
200
400
600
800
1000
(e)
0 500 1000 1500 20000
50
100
150
200
250
0 500 1000 1500 20000
200
400
600
800
1000
I beam [W
m-2
]
(f)
0 500 1000 1500 20000
5
10
15
20
25
30
I circum
sola
r [W
m-2
]
0 500 1000 1500 20000
200
400
600
800
1000
(g)
0 500 1000 1500 20000
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
0 500 1000 1500 20000
200
400
600
800
1000
I beam
[W
m-2
]
(g)
Figure 5.8 Circumsolar [red] and beam [blue] intensities for Alice Springs Desert model at (a) 300cm
-3 and (b)
900 cm-3
; Mildura clean continental model at (c) 1500 cm-3
and (d) 3500 cm-3
; Learmonth maritime clean model
at (e) 1500 cm-3
and (f) 2000 cm-3
; and Learmonth continental clean model at (g) 2600 cm-3
and (h) 3500 cm-3
.
29
Table 5.2 Average values for all sites using site relevant models and a range of number densities. A threshold
value of 500 W.m-2
was used for all calculations.
Location Av
era
ge
CS
R
Av
g.
DN
I
red
uct
ion
(W
.m-2)
Sa
mp
les
un
der
thre
sho
ld (
da
ys/
yr)
Av
era
ge
CS
R
Av
g.
DN
I
red
uct
ion
(W
.m-2)
Sa
mp
les
un
der
thre
sho
ld (
da
ys/
yr)
Av
era
ge
CS
R
Av
g.
DN
I
red
uct
ion
(W
.m-2)
Sa
mp
les
un
der
thre
sho
ld (
da
ys/
yr)
Continental Clean
1500 cm-3
2600 cm-3
3500 cm-3
Alice Springs 0.004 3.56 0.16 0.007 6.15 0.32 0.010 8.25 0.32
Broome 0.005 4.43 0.32 0.009 7.64 0.48 0.013 10.24 0.79
Darwin 0.004 3.12 0.82 0.008 5.38 1.09 0.010 7.22 1.64
Geraldton 0.005 4.27 0.00 0.009 7.37 0.53 0.012 9.88 0.70
Learmonth 0.005 4.04 0.39 0.008 6.98 0.78 0.011 9.35 0.78
Mildura 0.004 3.16 1.63 0.007 5.46 2.12 0.010 7.32 2.94
Rockhampton 0.005 4.20 0.94 0.009 7.25 1.51 0.012 9.72 1.70
Tennant Creek 0.004 3.31 0.49 0.007 5.72 0.99 0.009 7.67 0.99
Wagga Wagga 0.005 3.85 0.89 0.009 6.63 1.48 0.012 8.89 2.07
Desert
300 cm-3
900 cm-3
1500 cm-3
Tennant Creek 0.016 13.35 1.64 0.049 39.73 4.28 0.08 65.76 7.40
Wagga Wagga 0.019 14.33 3.11 0.056 42.38 8.44 0.09 69.32 19.39
Maritime Clean
1000 cm-3
1500 cm-3
2000 cm-3
Broome 0.014 11.72 0.95 0.022 17.54 1.43 0.029 23.34 1.91
Darwin 0.012 8.27 1.91 0.018 12.39 3.01 0.023 16.50 4.10
Geraldton 0.013 10.95 0.88 0.020 16.38 1.23 0.027 21.80 1.76
Learmonth 0.011 9.42 0.78 0.017 14.10 1.18 0.022 18.76 1.57
Rockhampton 0.012 9.70 1.70 0.018 14.53 1.89 0.025 19.35 3.59
Overall the results of this simulation indicate that the effects due to the inclusion or
exclusion of the circumsolar radiation will be small, yet non-negligible when averaged over the life
of a particular system. Coastal locations with a significant maritime aerosol component exhibit the
greatest effect.
30
5.3.1 Comparison with previous results
Previous experimental and simulation based investigations into circumsolar radiation and its impact
on CST systems considered average site CSR’s well beyond the 1-2% obtained in the above
simulation. Monger's (1996) model predicted an average CSR for Sydney, Australia of 0.0703.
Buie's 2003 analysis of the LBRDB data and subsequent calculations included CSR values up to
0.8. In both of the above mentioned works the large CSR values considered are most likely a result
of including CSR’s where the intensity is below the operational thresholds of many CST systems. In
Buie's (2003) analysis of the LBRDB data the criteria for a clear sky scan was that it could not
increase radially
( ) 0d
dφ θ
θ< (5.3.1)
allowing the inclusion of low intensity scans. An earlier analyses of the LBRDB by Rabl & Bendt
(1982) employed a threshold insolation value to filter the CSR data. For a 300W.m-2
threshold the
average monthly CSR values were typically between 0.02 and 0.05 with a few specific months at
one location reaching 0.1. Employing a 500W.m-2
threshold the majority of average monthly CSR
values fell to between 0.01 and 0.03 similar to the results obtained by the current simulation
5.4 Prediction of variables
5.4.1 Relative Humidity
Historical investigations have shown changing trends in relative humidity. Wijngaarden & Vincent
(2005) for example described a decrease in relative humidity in western Canada between 1953 and
2003, however the magnitude of the decrease had to be revised due the later discovered systematic
error introduced by the installation of new instrumentation by the Canadian Weather Bureau.
There is a general consensus the global temperature is set to rise however the magnitude of the
change is the subject of much debate and ranges from an increase of 1 degree to 7 degrees by the
end of the century (IPCC Third Assessment Report, 2001). This temperature increase will cause
increased evaporation from open bodies of water, however it will simultaneously increase the
saturation vapour pressure thus not necessarily leading to an increase in relative humidity
(Pierrehumbert et al., 2005).Models have however predicted drops in the relative humidity, albeit in
the upper troposphere as the surface temperature rises (Minschwaner & Dessler, 2004). While
global relative humidity may remain constant, climate change has the potential to drive localized
changes in weather patterns and thus alter both the average local relative humidity and its temporal
profile.
31
5.4.2 Aerosols
Due to the short lifetime of tropospheric aerosols, the diversity and variability of production
sources, long term prediction is extremely difficult. Anthropogenically produced aerosols, such as
sulphurous or soot particles from biomass and fossil fuel burning are within human control. This is
illustrated by the apparent reversal of the so called “global dimming” effect - the term given to the
decreasing trend in the amount of global solar radiation - when pollution controls were imposed in
the United States and Europe (Stanhill & Cohen, 2001). Another concerning, for solar energy at
least, and remotely plausible anthropogenic aerosol source is a result of a drastic plan to reduce
global warming. The idea entails the injection of sulphurous particles into the stratosphere to
increase Earth’s albedo (Crutzen, 2006). This would have disastrous effects for solar energy as was
evidenced by the 30% drop in output from the SEGS facility in Southern California after the
eruption of Mt. Pinatubo which injected a large amount of sulphur dioxide into the atmosphere
(Michalsky et al., 1994).
Aerosols derived from natural processes are potentially more variable and uncontrollable however it
is possible to speculate on the changes to naturally derived aerosols due to climate change.
Increasing the temperature will inject additional energy into the atmosphere which may result in
localized increases in wind velocity; a key determinant in the production of both terrestrial and
maritime aerosols. Increased desertification will expose more bare earth from which additional
aerosols may be produced. A combination of both increased desertification and increased wind
velocity could potentially have a substantial impact.
32
6 Conclusion
6.1.1 Summary of work
Previous investigations have illustrated that the amount of energy contained in the solar aureole is
both significant to CST systems and highly variable. The distribution and magnitude of the
circumsolar radiation depends the prevailing aerosol types and distributions. From the well
understood impact that relative humidity has on hygroscopic aerosol size distributions a model was
constructed to in order to investigate the relationship between circumsolar radiation and relative
humidity. Results showed that as expected high relative humidity significantly enhanced the amount
of circumsolar radiation, however the angular distribution within the aureole was highly dependent
on the aerosol model employed. The modelled distribution of circumsolar radiation was
significantly different from the SMARTS2 model, attributed to the highly forward peaked phase
functions it employed.
In order to assess the relevance of the calculated changes induced by modifications to relative
humidity, measured data from geographically and climatically distinct sites around Australia were
obtained. This data were appropriately manipulated, filtered and analysed. In conjunction with the
resultant data, the previously developed calculations were applied. It was found that at the majority
of locations, the effects of high values of relative humidity would have a minimal impact due to the
fact that during conditions of high DNI relative humidity was rarely above the critical value of 70%
- the value beyond which aerosol optical characteristics are significantly altered. It was evident
from the data supplied that at all locations there is an approximately inverse relationship between
relative humidity and DNI which is most likely due to its effect on cloud conditions.
6.1.2 Implications for Solar Energy
Assessment of the projected long term solar resource available at the proposed site of a CST system
is of utmost importance, both from a design choice and optimization perspective as well as an
economic one. For highly concentrating systems with acceptance half angles less than 2.5º this
assessment needs to take circumsolar radiation into account for two reasons. Firstly the majority of
direct beam data collected is done so using NIP’s with acceptance half angles between 2.5º and 3.5º
leading to a potential overestimate of available DNI from historical data. Secondly even if
historically accurate descriptions of the circumsolar radiation are available the system will be
sensitive to potential future variations.
33
The modelling and analysis described in this report suggests while high relative humidity does
significantly alter the aerosol size distribution and consequently the circumsolar radiation,
conditions where this would occur concurrent to operation of a CST system are rare, at least in the
Australian locations assessed. In situations where such conditions do prevail the aerosol type and
size distribution produce marked differences. Maritime derived aerosols, relevant for potential
coastal sites, exhibit a much tighter distribution around the solar disc under high relative humidity
conditions compared with continental aerosols.
6.1.3 Future work
It would be useful to further investigate the interaction between relative humidity and circumsolar
radiation by using more specific data about the aerosol composition of a particular site. This would
allow some of the assumptions employed in the current analysis to be avoided leading to more
accurate results. Another method of further investigation would be to combine detailed circumsolar
scans at a particular location with simultaneous measurements of relative humidity at sufficiently
small time intervals so as to allow daily variation to be considered.
The focus for CST related circumsolar radiation assessment should be on the measurement and
prediction of the specific aerosol cycles prevailing at a location. Relative humidity, while
contributing a non-negligible effect on circumsolar radiation, is likely to have its greatest effect on
the nature and frequency of clouds which will be significantly more important on the overall system
performance.
34
7 References
Blanco-Muriel, M., Alarcon-Padilla, D. C., Lopez-Moratalla, T., & Lara-Coira, M. (2001).
Computing the Solar Vector. Solar Energy, 70(5), 431-441.
Bohren, C. F., & Albrecht, B. A. (1998). Atmospheric Thermodynamics. New York: Oxford
University Press
Bohren, C. F., & Huffman., D. R. (1998). Absorption and scattering of light by small particles.
New York: Wiley.
Box, M. A. (2004). Fortran Mie Scattering Calculations. Sydney: University of New South Wales.
Box, M. A., & Deepak, A. (1978). Single and multiple scattering contributions to circumsolar
radiation. Applied Optics, 17(23).
Box, M. A., Lo, S. Y., & McKellar, B. H. J. (1977). Atmospheric turbidity and the circumsolar
radiation. Applied Optics, 16, 341-.
Buie, D. (2003). Optical considerations in solar concentrating systems. University of Sydney,
Sydney.
Buie, D., & Monger, A. G. (2004). The effect of circumsolar radiation on a solar concentrating
system. Solar Energy, 76(1-3), 181-185.
Carpenter, S., Kemp, S., Robillard, P., & Whittaker, S. (1999). World Bank Report: Cost reduction
study for solar thermal power plants. Ottawa: Enermodal Engineering Ltd. & Marbek
Resource Consultants Ltd.
Crutzen, P. (2006). Albedo Enhancement by Stratospheric Sulfur Injections: A Contribution to
Resolve a Policy Dilemma? Climatic Change, 77(3), 211-220.
d'Almeida, G. A., Koepke, P., & Shettle, E. P. (1991). Atmospheric aerosols : global climatology
and radiative characteristics. Hampton, Va., USA: A. Deepak Pub.
Day, D. E., Malm, W. C., & Kreidenweis, S. M. (2000). Aerosol Light Scattering Measurements as
a Function of Relative Humidity. Journal of Air & Waste Management Association, 50, 710-
716.
Du, H. (2004). Mie-scattering calculation. Applied Optics, 43(9), 1951-1956.
Fitzgerald, J. W., Hoppel, W. A., & Vietti, M. A. (1982). The Size and Scattering Coefficient of
Urban Aerosol Particles at Washington, DC as a Function of Relative Humidity. Journal of
the Atmospheric Sciences, 39(8), 1838-1852.
Gueymard, C. A. (2001). Parameterized transmittance model for direct beam and circumsolar
spectral irradiance. Solar Energy, 71(5), 325-346.
Gueymard, C. A. (2003a). Direct solar transmittance and irradiance predictions with broadband
models. Part I: detailed theoretical performance assessment. Solar Energy, 74, 355-379.
35
Gueymard, C. A. (2003b). Direct solar transmittance and irradiance predictions with broadband
models. Part II: validation with high-quality measurements. Solar Energy, 74, 381-395.
Gueymard, C. A., & Garrison, J. D. (1998). Critical evaluation of precipitable water and
atmospheric turbidity in Canada using measured hourly solar irradiance. Solar Energy,
62(4), 291-307.
Hanel, G., & Zankl, B. (1979). Aerosol size and relative humidity: Water uptake by mixtures of
salts. Tellus, 31, 478-486.
Hess, M., Koepke, P., & Schult, I. (1998). Optical Properties of Aerosols and Clouds: The Software
Package OPAC. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79(5), 831-844.
Hewer, F. (2006). A scoping study on the impacts of climate change on the UK energy industry.
Exeter: United Kingdom Met Office.
IPCC Third Assessment Report. (2001).). Geneva, Switzerland: Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change.
Jeys, T. H., & Vant-Hull, L. L. (1976). The contribution of the solar aureole to the measurements of
pyrheliometers. Solar Energy, 18(4), 343-348.
Kay, M., & Box, M. (2000). Radiative effects of absorbing aerosols and the impact of water vapor.
Journal of Geophysical Research, 105(D10), 12221-12234.
Lohmann, S., Schillings, C., Mayer, B., & Meyer, R. (2006). Long-term variability of solar direct
and global radiation derived from ISCCP data and comparison with reanalysis data. Solar
Energy, In Press, Uncorrected Proof.
Michalsky, J. J., Perez, R., Seals, R., & Ineichen, P. (1994). Degradation of solar concentrator
performance in the aftermath of Mount Pinatubo. Solar Energy, 52(2), 205-213.
Minschwaner, K., & Dessler, A. E. (2004). Water Vapor Feedback in the Tropical Upper
Troposphere: Model Results and Observations. Journal of Climate, 17(6), 1272-1282.
Monger, A. G. (1996). Studies into the measurement and prediction of intensity within the solar
aureole. Unpublished Ph.D, The University of Sydney, Sydney.
Noring, J. E., Grether, D. F., & Hunt, A. J. (1991). Circumsolar Radiation Data: The Lawrence
Berkeley Laboratory Reduced Data Base. Retrieved May 2006, from
http://rredc.nrel.gov/solar/pubs/circumsolar/
Pierrehumbert, R. T., Brogniez, H., & Roca, R. (2005). On the relative humidity of the Earth's
atmosphere. In T. Schneider & A. Sodel (Eds.), The General Circulation. Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press (to appear).
Power, H. C., & Goyal, A. (2003). Comparison of aerosol and climate variability over Germany and
South Africa. International Journal of Climatology, 23(8), 921-941.
Quaschning, V. (2004). Technical and economical system comparison of photovoltaic and
concentrating solar thermal power systems depending on annual global irradiation. Solar
Energy, 77(2), 171-178.
Rabl, A. (1985). Active solar collectors and their applications. New York: Oxford University Press.
36
Rabl, A., & Bendt, P. (1982). Effect of circumsolar radiation on performance
of focusing collectors. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 104, 237–250.
Randriamiarisoa, H., Chazette, P., Couvert, P., Sanak1, J., & Megie, G. (2006). Relative humidity
impact on aerosol parameters in a Paris suburban area. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics,
6, 1389-1407.
Schubnell, M. (1992b). Sunshape and its influence on the flux distribution
in imaging solar concentrators. Journal of Solar Energy Engineering, 114, 260–267.
Shettle, E. P., & Fenn, R. W. (1979). Models for the aerosols of the lower atmosphere and the
effects of humidity variations on their optical properties. Environmental Research Paper Air
Force Geophysics Lab., Hanscom AFB, MA. Optical Physics Div.
Sims, R. E. H. (2004). Renewable energy: a response to climate change. Solar Energy, 76, 9-17.
Stanhill, G., & Cohen, S. (2001). Global dimming: a review of the evidence for a widespread and
significant reduction in global radiation with discussion of its probable causes and possible
agricultural consequences. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 107(4), 255-278.
Thomalla, E., Kopke, P., Muller, H., & Quenzel, H. (1983). Circumsolar radiation calculated for
various atmospheric conditions. Solar Energy, 30(6), 575-587.
Thomas, G. E., & Stamnes, K. (1999). Radiative Transfer in the Atmosphere and Ocean.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Twomey, S. (1977). Atmospheric Aerosols. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Wijngaarden, W. A. v., & Vincent, L. A. (2005). Examination of discontinuities in hourly surface
relative humidity in Canada during 1953–2003. Journal of Geophysical Research, 110,
D22102.
37
8 Appendices
8.1 Appendix A: Additional Equations
8.1.1 Local Time to Solar Time calculation
Based on the details given in (Rabl, 1985) the change from the local time to the local solar time is
given by
4* ( )LSTM L
T EoTθ θ∆ = − + (8.1.1)
where EoT is the equation of time given by
9.87sin(2 ) 7.53cos( ) 1.5sin( )n n n
EoT B B B= − − (8.1.2)
where
360
( 81)364
nB N= − (8.1.3)
where N is the day number since January 1 of that year.
8.1.2 Computation of the Mie coefficients
One widely used approach (Bohren & Huffman., 1998) for calculating the Mie coefficients involves
the introduction of a logarithmic derivative:
( ) ( )lnn n
dD
dρ ψ ρ
ρ= (8.1.4)
Which allows the Mie coefficients (3.3.3) to be rewritten as
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( )( ) ( ) ( )
1
1
1
1
/ /
/ /
/ /
/ /
n n n
n
n n n
n n n
n
n n n
D mx m n x x xa
D mx m n x x x
mD mx m n x x xb
mD mx m n x x x
ψ ψ
ξ ξ
ψ ψ
ξ ξ
−
−
−
−
+ − =+ −
+ − =+ −
(8.1.5)
where the following recurrence relationships have been used to eliminate 'n
ψ and 'n
ξ
( ) ( )( )
( ) ( )( )
1 1' 'n n
n n n n
n x n xx x x x
x x
ψ ξψ ψ ξ ξ− −= − = − (8.1.6)
The logarithmic derivative (8.1.4) satisfies the following recurrence relationship
1
1
/n
n
nD
D nρ ρ− = −
+ (8.1.7)
and can therefore be calculated either by upwards or downwards recurrence.
38
Calculation of the angular functions n
π and n
τ is relatively simple and they are well behaved using
the following upward recurrence relationships:
( )
1 2
1
2 1
1 1
1
n n n
n n n
n n
n n
n n
π µπ π
τ µπ π
− −
−
−= −
− −
= − +
(8.1.8)
where cosµ θ= and with the initial values of 0 0π = and 1 1π =
39
8.2 Appendix C: Additional Figures
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005
Year
Rela
tive H
um
idit
y %
Darwin
Alice Springs
Broome
Geraldton
Learmonth
Mildura
Rockhampton
Tennant Creek
Wagga Wagga
Figure 8.1 Annual average relative humidity for the nine locations between 1975 and 2000.