Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Influence of Trade Costs and Trade Facilitation on Connecting to Global and Regional Value Chains
Workshop on the 2015 Aid-for-Trade Monitoring and Evaluation Exercise and Aid-for-Trade At a Glance Publication
WTO, Geneva, 28 May 2015
Background and Outline
The internationalisation of production offer developing countries new opportunities to integrate into the global economy
Stronger focus on addressing policy and non-policy related trade costs
Multilateral and regional trade cooperation can help : deepen integration by covering many dimensions of GVCs.
Trade facilitation seems to be an important determinant of GVC participation.
There is room for improvement in this area; infrastructure and other trade facilitation aspects.
Aid for Trade projects have targeted regional constraints and improved regional economic co-operation
Trade projects have targeted regional al economic co-operationOECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate 2
Global and Regional Dimensions to GVC : How do countries engage in GVC
• Adding both ways (backward and forward) we observe increase in GVC participation and heterogeneity in level of participation
• Cross regional differences in the way they engage regionally vs extra-regionally
Source: OECD (2015) Calculations based on EORA database 3
Global and Regional Dimension to GVC: Determinants of Participation
• Understanding participation requires more than just looking at relative participation rate
• GVC participation ratio (backward and forward) are analysed against a number of factors : Policy and Non-Policy– Structural characteristics of countries are the main determinants of
participation– Investment openness matters for backward integration – Trade Policy explains lower integration of South Asia, Africa and LAC
compared to other regions.– Residual capturing other factors (infrastructure, regulations, and other
NTMs such as logistics and border procedures) are more important
OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate 4
Global and Regional Dimension to GVC: Determinants of Participation
Source: OECD (2015) Estimations based on EORA database
5
Global and Regional Dimension to GVC: The role of Trade Costs
• Trade facilitation in its narrow or broad definition is important
Source: OECD (2015) Estimations based on OECD TiVA database
• With goods crossing borders multiple times, trade facilitation has become central to the smooth functioning of GVCs
OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate6
Regional Perspective to Trade Costs: Average Trade costs (ESCAP-World Bank Trade Cost Database )
• Trade costs :0-10% are tariffs, 10-30% correspond to natural trade costs, 60-80% relates to policy non-tariff measures
• South East Asia face the lowest costs among developing regions
Source: OECD (2015) calculations based on ESCAP-World Bank Trade Cost Database
7
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
CPV
NGA
CIV
GHA
SEN
LBR
MRT
MLI
CMR
BFA
BEN
TGO
GNQ
TCD
NER
GMB
CAF
ZWE
ZAF
ZMB
KEN
TZA
ETH
MUS
MWI
UGA
AGO
MOZ
SDN
RWA
BDI
IND
PAK
AFG
LKA
BTN
NPL
MDV
KAZ
UZB
MKD
GEO
MDA
TJK
KGZ
ALB
AZE
ARM
CHL
BRA
CRI
ARG
GTM
HND
PER
COL
ECU
SLV
URY
PAN
NIC
PRY
DOM
BOL
VEN
DZA
ISR
TUR
TUN
MAR
JOR
EGY
IRN
SYR
LBN
YEM
MYS
CHN
VNM
THA
PHL
IDN
PNG
LAO
KHM
Western and Central Africa East and Southern Africa South Asia Central Asia Latin America Middle East and North Africa East Asia
Average trade costs (trade weighted)
Regional Perspective to Trade Costs: Intra-regional Trade costs
• Central Asia has the lowest costs among developing countries (CAREC)
• Investment in infrastructure and trade facilitation in South East Asia has contributed to the low intra-regional trade costs (ASEAN)
• South Asia, Latin America and even more SSA display high intra-regional trade costs
Source: OECD (2015) calculations based on ESCAP-World Bank Trade Cost Database
8
E27 ECA ESA LAC MEN NA SA SEA WCAEuropean Union E27 34.3Europe and Central Asia ECA 67.3 64.8Eastern and Southern Africa ESA 112.0 146.0 103.7Latin America LAC 109.5 158.4 186.2 93.6Middle East North Africa MEN 76.0 109.4 91.0 135.0 48.3North America NA 65.5 102.6 125.0 92.3 72.2 14.8South Asia SA 94.8 136.5 161.9 183.8 60.8 88.6 92.0South East Asia SEA 88.0 119.5 155.1 127.9 69.4 71.9 103.6 68.8Western and Central Africa WCA 106.7 168.2 93.7 123.7 112.4 105.4 99.6 162.0 104.3
Regional Perspective to Trade Costs: Trade Infrastructure and Trade Facilitation
• Trade facilitation comes first as source of trade cost in the AfT Survey
Source: OECD/WTO questionnaires Global Review Aid-For-Trade Monitoring Exercise 2015
9
W ha t a re the mo st imp o rta nt so urce s o f tra d e co s ts fo r the e xp o rt ?
Go o d s Se rv ice s
83.3%51.4%79.2%80.6% 68.1%55.6% 77.8%59.7%4.2% 5.6%
44.4%22.2%44.4%44.4%19.4%43.1%
Bo rd e r p ro ce d ure s (tra d e fa c il i ta tio n)Tariffs, fees and other chargesNo n-T a riff Me a sure s (inc lud ing s ta nd a rd s)T ra nsp o rt infra s truc tureNe two rk infra struc ture (ICT , p o we r, te le co ms)Access to trade financeOtherNon-recognition of professional qualificationsRestrictions on commercial presenceRestrictions on movement of natural personsPoor regulatory environment for servicesTariffs on product inputs (on computers for ICT services..)Low levels of skills in service sectors
Answe r Op tio ns
Regional Perspective to Trade Costs: Trade Infrastructure (infrastructure quality in WCI)
Source: World Competitiveness indicators 201010
‐2
‐1.5
‐1
‐0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Angola
Lesotho
Burund
i
Tanzan
ia
Madagascar
Mala
wi
Zimbabw
e
Rwanda
Kenya
Botsw
ana
Ethio
pia
Mauritius
South A
frica
Namibia
Paraguay
Vene
zuela
Bolivia
Costa
Rica
Brazil
Colom
bia
Argentina
Guyana
Peru
Ecuado
r
Dom. R
epub
lic
Hond
uras
Uruguay
Guatem
ala
El Salva
dor
Panama
Chile
Eastern and Southern Africa Latin America & Caribbean
Stan
dardize
d scores
‐2
‐1.5
‐1
‐0.5
0
0.5
1
1.5
Libya Iran
Algeria
Lebano
n
Morocco
Egypt
Turkey
Jordan
Tunis
ia
Afghanistan
Nepal
Banglas
desh
Pakis
tan
India
Sri Lanka
Mon
golia
Philip
pines
Viet Nam
Indo
nesia
Cambo
dia
China
Thailand
Mala
ysia
Chad
Mauritania
Nigeria
Burkina
Faso
Cameroo
n
Benin
Ghan
a
Sene
gal
Côte d'Ivo
ire
Middle East & North Africa South Asia Southeast and East Asia West and Central Africa
Stan
dardize
d scores
Regional Perspective to Trade Costs: Infrastructure : when projects make a difference
• The leading position of East Asia is clearly showcased in the Greater Mekong Sub-region (GMS) project
• In Africa :the Priority Road Transport Programme (PRTP) not completed and the railway project witnessed very slow progress
• But decreasing trade costs is not only about infrastructures it is also facilitating trade procedures
OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate 11
Regional Perspective to Trade Costs: Trade Facilitation (OECD TFI Index)
OECD (2015) Note: The TFIs values range between 0 and 2, where 2 corresponds to the best performance. The values indicate the average TFI performance by country group.
12
Regional Perspective to Trade Costs: Potential Trade Costs reduction
OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate 13
Source: OECD Trade Facilitation Index: reduction of trade costs in percentage for an increase in TF index
Regional Perspective to Trade Costs: Trade Facilitation & GVC: insight from OECD (2015)
• key sets of measures for developing the supply side (forward-type linkages) of the value chain activity
– proportionality and transparency of import and export fees and charges– automation of border processes – streamlining of border procedures – Consultations and opportunities to comment for Trade community*– Availability of trade-related information*
• key sets of measures to encourage the most linkages on the demand side (backward-type linkages) of the value chain activity
– proportionality and transparency of import and export fees and charges– automation of border processes – streamlining of border procedures – Advance rulings*
OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate 14
Regional Initiative Trade Facilitation: Regional Agenda: Aid flows
Source: OECD based on OECD-CRS data 15
• heterogeneity in the share of aid spending directed at trade facilitation in the narrow sense (border procedures) as compared to spending directed at infrastructure
heterogeneity can be observed across regions in the share of aid for trade spending directed at trade facilitation in the narrow sense (border procedures) as compared to spending directed at infrastructure
9.9% 10.7%
6.2% 7.3%
12.3%
1.2%
2.1%
‐
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Middle East Latin America North Africa Central Asia Sub‐SaharanAfrica
South Asia East Asia
Total TF over 200
4‐2013
(millions $US)
Trade FacilitationCommunication infrastructureTransport infrastructure
ShareofnarrowtradefacilitationinTotal
Regional Initiative Trade Facilitation: Actions
Source: OECD/WTO questionnaires Global Review Aid-For-Trade Monitoring Exercise 2015
16
In which a re a s ha ve a c tio ns b e e n und e rta ke n o r a re o n-g o ing ? Na tio na l Ac tio ns
Re g io na l Actio ns
94.3% 93.4%54.3% 59.0%71.4% 72.1%71.4% 47.5%72.9% 63.9%47.1% 19.7%0.0% 1.6%
72.9% 65.6%65.7% 52.5%62.9% 57.4%62.9% 59.0%37.1% 19.7%2.9% 4.9%
Tariffs on product inputs (e.g. on Unsure
Transport infrastructure (e.g. for tourism)Reforms of national regulatory Negotiations with trading partners on
UnsureFOR SERVICES:Network infrastructure (ICT, power,
Network infrastructure (ICT, power, Transport infrastructureAccess to trade finance
Border procedures (trade facilitation)Tariffs, fees and other chargesNon-Tariff Measures (including
Answe r Op tio ns
FOR MERCHANDISE GOODS:
Regional Initiative Trade Facilitation: Regional Agenda: projects
• Interest for regional projects combining Infrastructure and trade facilitation, such as CAREC and GSM that gave good results
• In Africa project focusing on TF only are most prevalent, except the Abidjan-Lagos TTFP, but it is progressing too slowly
• Latin America is an important recipient of aid for trade facilitation : Mesoamerican initiative in Central America
• South Asia hosted few assistance projects focussing on narrow trade facilitation.
OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate 17
Regional Initiative on Trade Facilitation: Regional Co-operation: who are the players
• Asia– ASEAN/AEC: blue print initiative– ADB: Now is aligning closely with the implementation of the AEC and regional
Initiative
• Latin America– PTA: Three quarters of LACs preferential trade agreements (PTA) include trade
facilitation commitments. – The IDB has strengthened this institutional priority by establishing a financial
goal for 2015 of investing 15 percent of its loans in integration projects.
• Africa– Many African RECs have implemented trade-facilitation initiatives: COMESA-
ECOWAS- EAC- SADC– In March 2012 AfDb has established the Trade Fund (AfTra) that will notably
focus on improving trade facilitation in RMCs and RECs
OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate 18
Conclusions
• Several areas of economic and institutional development which matter for GVCs fall within the purview of the Aid for Trade Initiative.
• Trade facilitation and quality of infrastructure are estimated to have strong impacts on GVC integration
• There is room for improvement in this area; Africa, South Asia and Latin America are significantly lagging behind in terms of trade costs
• Regional co-operation can be an effective strategy to promote integration into value chains and enhance regional integration
• The responses to the 2015 WTO-OECD surveys confirm that actions have been taken in the key areas.
• One major challenge for the future is the need for better co-ordination at the regional level of infrastructure projects with narrow trade facilitation projects
OECD Trade and Agriculture Directorate 19
For more information
• Visit our website: www.oecd.org/trade
• Contact us: [email protected]
• Follow us on Twitter: @OECDtrade
20
Trade and Agriculture Directorate