Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Impact of Financial Education for the Youth
Veronica Frisancho†
†Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department ([email protected])
OECD-Russia Global Symposium
Moscow, 4-5 October 2018
Introduction Evidence Conclusion
Financial Education
Financial literacy is associated with better financial and economic outcomes
More countries are implementing national financial inclusion strategies with a
strong financial education component
Focus on youth, especially school-age population
But what do we know about the impact of financial education for the youth?
1/7
Introduction Evidence Conclusion
Large Impact of Financial Education for the Youth
Recent evidence of sizeable effects among the youth
Impressive compared to education interventions in general
NOTE: Weights are from random effects analysis
Overall (I−squared = 84.9%, p = 0.000)
Study
Becchetti 2012i
ID
Hinojosa 2009i
Berry 2018i
Hinojosa 2009i
Jamison 2014iii
Batty 2017i
Hinojosa 2009i
Batty 2015i
Berry 2018ii
Bover 2018i
Bruhn 2016i
Frisancho 2018i
Furtado 2017i
Jamison 2014ii
0.19 (0.13, 0.25)
0.32 (0.02, 0.62)
ES (95% CI)
0.42 (0.23, 0.61)
0.02 (−0.09, 0.12)
0.38 (0.15, 0.61)
0.08 (0.03, 0.14)
0.16 (0.01, 0.32)
0.50 (0.34, 0.66)
0.68 (0.45, 0.90)
−0.01 (−0.12, 0.11)
0.17 (0.04, 0.29)
0.21 (0.16, 0.25)
0.14 (0.10, 0.19)
0.07 (0.00, 0.14)
0.09 (0.03, 0.14)
100.00
%
3.08
Weight
5.28
7.85
4.31
9.52
6.27
6.15
4.39
7.77
7.21
9.72
9.80
9.12
9.52
0.19 (0.13, 0.25)
0.32 (0.02, 0.62)
ES (95% CI)
0.42 (0.23, 0.61)
0.02 (−0.09, 0.12)
0.38 (0.15, 0.61)
0.08 (0.03, 0.14)
0.16 (0.01, 0.32)
0.50 (0.34, 0.66)
0.68 (0.45, 0.90)
−0.01 (−0.12, 0.11)
0.17 (0.04, 0.29)
0.21 (0.16, 0.25)
0.14 (0.10, 0.19)
0.07 (0.00, 0.14)
0.09 (0.03, 0.14)
100.00
%
3.08
Weight
5.28
7.85
4.31
9.52
6.27
6.15
4.39
7.77
7.21
9.72
9.80
9.12
9.52
0−1 −.75 −.5 −.25 0 .25 .5 .75 1
2/7
Introduction Evidence Conclusion
The Case of Peru: A Large-Scale Experiment
Financial Literacy GPA 2016 GPA 2017 Pr(Work) Self-ControlTreatment 0.143*** 0.094*** 0.022 0.000 0.032**
[0.022] [0.025] [0.021] [0.008] [0.016]Number of Observations 19673 19170 11464 19247 17391Mean in Control 0.30 0.53 -0.03 0.40 -0.03
Large impact on financial skills (≈ 14.8-point improvement in PISA 2015)
(Short lived) boost on grades
No effect on probability to work
Impact on self-control
3/7
Introduction Evidence Conclusion
Even Larger Impact if Made High Stakes
School-based programs with course requirement have sizeable impact
Average impact on financial skills increases to 0.24SD
Null or small impact of voluntary after school programs
Low take up and participation rates
4/7
Introduction Evidence Conclusion
Impact Seems Inclusive: No Heterogenous Effects
In the Peruvian case, no differential effects by:
Gender, previous exposure to financial lessons
Initial financial or math skills
Family background
Slight difference in learning by asset index
5/7
Introduction Evidence Conclusion
Conclusion
Financial competencies are becoming more relevant as economies transform
Younger generations are ill prepared and face increasingly complex
environment
School-based financial education works!
Starting early pays off in the short-run
Some evidence on potential to affect long-run behavior
Next steps:
Scalability in schools
Experiential learning leveraging on technology
6/7
Financial Education: Young People in the Digital Age
Annamaria Lusardi(GFLEC, and Italian Financial Education Committee)
OECD-Russia Global Symposium, Moscow, 4-5 October, 2018
Some Questions about the Young People in the Digital Age
1. How well-equipped are young people to deal with this new digital finance environment?
2. How financially literate are young people?
3. Does fin-tech help the younger generations improve their financial decisions?
The PISA Financial Literacy Assessment
Measuring Financial Literacy Among the Young
• PISA is the first large-scale international study to assess the financial literacy of 15-year-old students
• 18 countries participated in the 2012 Financial Literacy Assessment
• 15 countries participated in the 2015 Financial Literacy Assessment
• Russia participated in both the 2021 and 2015 Finlit Assessment
The countries/economies are:
2012: Australia, Belgium (Flemish Community), Shanghai-China, Colombia, Croatia, Czech Republic, Estonia, France, Israel, Italy, Latvia, New Zealand, Poland, Russia, Slovak Republic, Slovenia, Spain, and the United States
2015: Australia, Belgium (Flemish Community), Brazil, B-S-J-G (China), Chile, Canadian provinces, Italy, Lithuania, Netherlands, Peru, Poland, Russia, Slovak Republic, Spain, and the United States
• On average across OECD countries and economies, 22% of students do not have basic financial skills
22%
Too Many Students Lack Basic Financial Skills (2015 Data)
• Only about 12% of students across participating OECD countries and economies are top performers, as they can tackle the most difficult tasks
12%
Changes in financial literacy scores between 2012 and 2015 in percentage terms
-5.09%-4.71%
-4.55%
-3.30%
-2.20%
-0.92% -0.81%
3.87%
5.13%
-6.00%
-4.00%
-2.00%
0.00%
2.00%
4.00%
6.00%
POLAND SLOVAK REPUBLIC AUSTRALIA SPAIN OECD AVERAGE-7 BELGIUM UNITED STATES ITALY RUSSIA
PER
CEN
TAG
E C
HA
NG
E
PERCENTAGE CHANGE BETWEEN 2012 AND 2015 IN MEAN FINANCIAL LITERACY PERFORMANCE ADJUSTED FOR DEMOGRAPHIC CHANGES
A Simple Measure of Financial Literacy:The Big Three
“Suppose you had $100 in a savings account and the interest rate was 2% per year. After 5 years, how much do you think you would have in the account if you left the money to grow?”
More than $102 Exactly $102 Less than $102 Don’t know Refuse to answer
More than $102 Exactly $102 Less than $102 Don’t know Refuse to answer
True False Don`t know Refuse to answer
“Imagine that the interest rate on your savings account was 1% per year and inflation was 2% per year. After 1 year, with the money in this account, would you be able to buy…”
“Do you think the following statement is true or false? Buying a single company stock usually provides a safer return than a stock mutual fund.”
1.
2.
3.
Financial Literacy Across Age 2015 US National Financial Capability Study
(% answering Big 3 questions correctly)
13%
18%
24%27%
35% 36%38% 37%
44%47%
51%
42%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
18-24 25-29 30-34 35-39 40-44 45-49 50-54 55-59 60-64 65-69 70-74 75+
• Financial knowledge increases very slowly with age/cohort• Less than 25% know 3 basic concept by age 35 even though
many important decisions are made before that age
1st Report - Millennial Mobile Payment Users: A Look into their Personal Finances and Financial Behaviors
Compared to non-users, Millennials who use mobile payments are more likely to:
• occasionally overdraw their checking account (33% vs. 19%). This is an especially concerning practice because it often incurs in high penalty fees.
• pay fees on their credit cards in the past 12 months (58% vs. 45%)
• make withdrawals from their retirement account (37% vs. 9%)
• use alternative financial services such as pawnshops or payday loans (50% vs. 23%)
21%
33%
18%19%
Overdraws checkingaccount
Overdraws checkingaccount
Users Non-users
2016 GFLEC Mobile Payments Survey
2015 NFCS
Checking account management (in the past 12 months)
1st Report - Millennial Mobile Payment Users: A Look into their Personal Finances and Financial Behaviors
• Only 40% of Millennial mobile payments users are able to answer the big three financial literacy questions correctly
• Those who use mobile payments are less likely to be financially literate.
• Respondents who use mobile payments and are financially literate are much less likely to engage in poor financial behaviors.
• Financial literacy and fintech are good complements, not substitutes
40%
53%
Users Non-users
Source: 2016 GFLEC Mobile Payments Survey
Financial literacy of mobile payment users
2nd Report - Millennial Financial Literacy and Fin-tech Use: Who Knows What in the Digital Era
The new insights from the 2018 P-Fin Index demonstrate that:
• Millennials answered 44 percent of P-Fin Index questions correctly, compared to 50 percent of the US adult population.
• Financial literacy is lowest in the areas of comprehending risk and insuring
• 80 percent of millennials use their smartphone for transactional purposes like paying bills and depositing checks.
• Almost 30 percent of millennials who use their smartphone to make mobile payments report overdrawing their checking account.
• Those who use mobile payments are more likely to overdraw their checking account
• Fin-tech users with higher financial literacy are less likely to overdraw their checking account
2nd Report - Millennial Financial Literacy and Fin-tech Use: Who Knows What in the Digital Era
Final Thoughts
Financial literacy is like reading and writing
• As it was not possible in the past to participate insociety without being able to read and write, so it isnot possible to thrive in today’s digital economywithout being financially literate
Building human capital for the 21st century
• Everyone deals with finance and finance is sufficiently complex that we cannot leave it to the individual to learn by himself/herself
HOW MILLENNIALS BEHAVE FINANCIALLY
PLANNING SAVING ATTITUDE BIG PURCHASES
plan their budget
from time to time
always plan
save money live for the moment and don’t
think about retirement
plan big purchases well in advance
Source: Financial Behavior of Millennials in Large Russian Cities, November 2017. GfK for Visa
#clie
nt-c
entr
ic#reliable#simple #innovative
#modern
#honest#accessible
#transparent
#safe
#24/7
#professional
#quick
#ind
ivid
ual a
ppro
ach
#discounts
CASHLESS IS A PRIORITYWhen choosing between cash and cashless payments millennials prefer cashless
All categories
Online shopping
Bank transfers
Source: Financial Behavior of Millennials in Large Russian Cities, November 2017. GfK for Visa
VISA FINANCIAL LITERACY PROGRAMSContributing to
financial educationTeaching children
basic financial terms
Helping Russian citizens master
financial planning
Explaining to children how payment
technologies work
Digitalization
Challenges & Opportunities for an international financial education organization
Roeland Monasch, CEO-Aflatoun International
Aflatoun Life Skills & Financial Education
Tools for different age groups
Five Core Elements
15-24+ years
Footprint Aflatoun – 5 Million Children
Over 200 Organizations in 109 Countries
Integration Education Curriculum: 30+ Governments
Educators Students
Who should we focus on?
While we were debating…
How do we empower teachers and children in a digital era?
Is one approach suitable for all countries?
Educators Students
Response: Aflatoun developed two platforms
Challenges
• Digital illiteracy – Especially for disadvantaged youth
• Lack of Internet access
• Different devices: simple phones, smartphones, etc
• Lack of direct link to Teacher, Parent
• Lack of Social Interaction: peer to peer learning
• Difficult to provide technical support
Financial Education
Shift 1: For Students - DO WHAT WE DO BESTCreating contextualized / localized digital learning resources
Shift 3: Content - focus on digital finance
Adapting our material to include lessons on Digital Financial Services