19
The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team

Sonya Legg

Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Page 2: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Representing overflows in climate models

•Ocean models need to represent overflow processes correctly to get dense water properties right.•Z-coordinate models have difficulties getting water downslope without excessive mixing at coarse climate resolution.•Isopycnal models need to parameterize diapycnal mixing.•Narrow straits are an issue for all coarse resolution models.

Shear instability, entrainment

detrainment

Geostrophic eddies

x

z

y

Downslope descent

Bottom friction

Physical processes in overflows

Hydraulic control

Dense water masses formed in marginal seas enter open ocean through overflows, e.g. Denmark Straits, Faroe Bank Channel, Antarctic slope overflows.

Mixing and transport in overflows determines properties of ocean bottom waters, e.g. NADW, AABW.

Page 3: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

How do we improve ocean model overflow representation?

Observations Laboratory and numerical process studies

Regional simulations Simulations in idealized configurations

Global climate simulations

Improved parameterizationscomparecalibrate

evaluate

The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team: a multi-institutional collaboration between those studying processes in detail and

those building and running climate models. A US CLIVAR project funded by NSF and NOAA, 2003-2008.

Page 4: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

CPT-GCE participants: Models, Numerical and Lab process studies, Observations

Core PIsStephen Griffies (GFDL), Robert Hallberg (GFDL),William Large (NCAR),

Gokhan Danabasoglu (NCAR), Peter Gent (NCAR), Jim Price (WHOI), Jiayan Yang (WHOI), Sonya Legg (WHOI/Princeton), Hartmut Peters

(Miami), Eric Chassignet (Miami), Tamay Ozgokmen (Miami), Tal Ezer

(Princeton), Arnold Gordon (Columbia), Paul Schopf (GMU)

Postdocs/ResearchersUlrike Riemenschneider (WHOI), Laura Jackson (GFDL), Yeon Chang

(Miami), Wanli Wu (NCAR)

For more details see http://www.cpt-gce.org

Page 5: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

CPT Activities, years 1-3

Annual workshops•Put observationalists, process study modelers and GCM developers in the same room•Opportunity for team to provide input/feedback to results/plans of team members•Opportunity to share results/plans with invited members of wider community•Forum for discussion of joint activities/plans•Starting point for continuing one-on-one collaborationsTable of observations

Compiled by team observationalists, lead by Arnold Gordon.Quick reference for:•Parameters needed in GCM overflow representations•Intercomparison of observed overflow characteristics•Comparison with regional and climate simulations.

Publications and presentations•Numerous individual publications•2 group publications in USCLIVAR Variations•1 synthesis article in preparation for BAMS•Numerous team posters/presentations

Page 6: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Summary of principal achievements of first 3 years of CPT

• Parameterization of frictional bottom boundary mixing in overflows: implementation in Hallberg Isopycnal Model has made a 1st order difference to its credibility as a climate ocean model at 1 degree.

• The Marginal Sea Boundary Condition has been implemented in climate models, NCAR POP and HYCOM: Med Sea Outflow can now be represented credibly at coarse resolution.

• New and improved shear mixing parameterizations have been developed.

• Partially open barrier method: identified as a promising method for representing narrow straits.

• Reduction in spurious mixing in z-coordinate models: several promising solutions are under investigation.

All of these developments have involved input from observations, idealized and regional numerical simulations, in addition to GCMs.

Page 7: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Observed profiles from Red Sea plume from RedSOX (Hartmut Peters)

Interior Ri# + Drag Mixing

Interior Ri# Mixing

Only

Focus on Frictional bottom boundary mixingLegg et al., 2005

HIM10 km

HIM10 km

Resolved mixing (LES)

MITgcm500m x 30m

Well-mixed Bottom Boundary LayerMixing driven by bottom stresses

Actively mixingInterfacial LayerShear Ri# Param.appropriate here.

With thick plumes both interfacial shear mixing and drag-induced near bottom mixing are needed. (Legg, Hallberg and Girton,2006).

Page 8: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Impact of frictional bottom boundary mixing on GCM results

Mediterranean outflow salinity: comparison between 1 degree Hallberg Isopycnal Model and observed climatology.

Spurious bottom plumeNew parameterization eliminates spurious bottom plume

Page 9: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Surface

Heat and salt conservation

-z

ATLANTICARCTIC

QS = g’ (hS)2 / 2f

QS

2100m

945m

686m

BOTTOM TOPOGRAPHY

QE

QP

ρS

(Source density based on 12 grid points)

ρ0

(Ent. density based on 12 grid points)

g’ = g (ρS-ρO)/ρref

QP = QSFr2/3

QP = QS + QE

+

Focus on the Marginal Sea Boundary ConditionParameterizes both narrow straits and entrainment, suitable for both isopycnal and z-coord models. Developed by Yang and Price, implemented in NCAR POP for Med Sea and Faroe Bank Channel, and in HYCOM for Med Sea.

NCAR MSBC implementation for FBC

Page 10: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Team interactions involved in MSBC implementation

• Parameterization originally developed by Yang and Price, who continue to consult on implementation issues.

• Numerous parameters must be specified: values are taken from Table of observations, and/or from regional simulations (Ulrike Riemenschneider, FBC).

• Whole team provides input on scenarios for examining impact in GCMs.

• Yang and Price continue to improve/update MSBC, with new developments to be ported to GCMs when ready.

Page 11: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Results: Impact of MSBC in GCM simulations

Salinity at 1100m depth: comparison between climatology and NCAR 3 degree simulations for Med outflow. MSBC leads to credible Med salt tongue.

Page 12: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

CPT plans for years 4 and 5 include:

• Complete implementation of MSBC in NCAR POP and HYCOM, for all climatologically important overflows.

• Complete new shear-driven mixing parameterizations, implement in HIM, MOM4 and other models.

• Complete implementation of partially open barriers in global models and compare with other methods of representing narrow straits.

• Focus on impact of parameterizations on Nordic overflows and Antarctic overflows.

• Examine impact of parameterizations on global climate simulations, including climate change scenarios, Greenland ice-melt scenarios.

Page 13: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Extra slides…..

Page 14: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Results:Table of observations

Faroe Bank Denmark St Ross Sea Weddell Sea Red Sea Med SeaJ .Price J . Girton A. Gordon A.Gordon H. Peters J .Price

Transport, SvSource 1.8 2.9 0.6 1.0 0.3 0.8Product 3.3 5.2 2 5 0.55 2.3

Thermobaric Parameter very small small significant significant very small very small

Froude number 1 0.3 - 1.2 0.9 to 1.1 1 0.3-0.9 1Descent radians of gravity current 0.15 0.2-0.6 0.6 0.6 1/2 PI 0.2Entrainment Rate [We, mm/ sec] 0.8 2 to 4 0.1Entrainment Rate [We/ u] 5 x 10-4 1 x 10-3 6 x 10-3 2 x 10-4 5 to 20 x 10-4

Deformation Radius [Rd] Km 30 1.7 - 8 7 7 40 100

Bottom slope near source 13 x 10-3 0.01 - 0.03 0.75 12 x 10-3

transit time, source to product 3-5 days 4-7 days 1 day 1 day 3.5 3-5 daystidal current [characteristic amp] 0.2 0.1 0.3 0.2 0.8 / a few cm/s 0.1

Purpose: Quick reference for:•Parameters needed in GCM overflow representations•Intercomparison of observed overflow characteristics•Comparison with regional and climate simulations. Effort led by Arnold Gordon.

Abbreviated version: for full version see http://www.cpt-gce.org/Table_of_observations.htm

Page 15: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Results: Improved parameterizations of shear-driven mixing.

cRi

RiEE 10

with E0= 0.2 and Ric=0.25 (Xu et al, 2006)

Downstream evolution of entrainment in HYCOM simulations with different entrainment parameterizations compared to nonhydrostatic (Nek) benchmark calculations.

Calibration of entrainment parameterization by comparison with nonhydrostatic benchmark calculations (Miami CPT members)

Calibrated parameterization is validated by comparison between regional simulations and observations. Example: Mediterranean outflow simulated in 0.08 degree HYCOM regional implementation (Xu et al, 2006).

Page 16: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Results: Improved parameterizations of shear-

driven mixing II

)(222

2

RiSFLz B

where S is the vertical shear of the resolved horizontal velocity NQLB /2/1is the buoyancy length scale (the scale of the overturns), N is the buoyancy frequency, and Q is the turbulent kinetic energy, found from an energy budget.

F(Ri) is a function of shear Richardson number Ri such as )/1(

)/1()( 0

c

c

RiRi

RiRiFRiF

cRiRi

Jackson and Hallberg (GFDL) are developing a new parameterization of shear-driven mixing for both isopycnal and z-coord models, with a parameterized diffusivity of the form:

Initial comparison with DNS of shear layers and jets looks promising. Validation with LES is continuing.

DNS data

ET parameterisation

New parameterisation

F0 = 0.14, cN = 0.41, cS = 0.10, = 0.6

F0 = 0.11, cN = 0.20, cS = 0.10, = 0.7

F0 = 0.12, cN = 1.87, cS = 0.10, = 0.9

Page 17: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Results: Impact of shear-driven mixing parameterization on climate

In coupled simulations using Hallberg Isopycnal model, with entrainment in Nordic overflows SSTs are warmer near entrainment site, and cooler to south, due to change in location of Gulf Stream induced by DWBC transport changes.

Page 18: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Results: Treatment of narrow straits

Representation of channels below grid scale by thin walls and partially open barriers is under development by Adcroft and Hallberg (GFDL).

This technique improves Mediterranean outflow simulations in Hallberg Isopycnal model at 1 degree (110km) resolution by reducing Gibraltar width to 12km.

Salinity in HIM global simulations and observations

Regional simulations of Red Sea (Chang et al, 2006), Mediterranean (Xu et al, 2006) and Faroe Bank Channel (Riemenschneider and Legg, 2006) show results are more sensitive to resolution of topography than to mixing parameterization.

Page 19: The Gravity Current Entrainment Climate Process Team Sonya Legg Princeton University, NOAA-GFDL

Results: reducing spurious mixing in z-coordinate models

Idealized simulations (Legg et al, 2006) and regional simulations (Riemenschneider and Legg, 2006) show that z-coordinate models produce too much numerical mixing, principally due to advection schemes.

Efforts to reduce spurious mixing in MOM4 (Griffies, GFDL) include:•New, less diffusive advection schemes•Improved sigma-diffusion schemes (Beckmann and Doescher, 1997).

Difference between CM2.1 simulations with and without sigma-diffusion at 100m in Med outflow region.

Promising recent development includes non-local horizontal communication in sigma-diffusion.