28
The future in animal feed Feeding the world an increasingly scarce, though essential nutrient

The future in animal feed - Agmondo...M. capsulatus Single cell protein The substrates for making UniProtein® are: a nitrogen source (ammonia), an energy source (methane or methanol),

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    13

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • The future in animal feedFeeding the world an increasingly scarce, though essential nutrient

  • 1

  • Table of contents

    About Unibio

    The concept

    The U-Loop® technology

    UniProtein®

    UniProtein® in the protein demand chain

    Environmentally friendly production

    Chemical composition

    Seven reasons to use UniProtein® in animal diets

    UniProtein® in pig diets

    UniProtein® in broiler diets

    UniProtein® in mink diets

    UniProtein® in blue fox diets

    UniProtein® in aqua diets

    The proper use of UniProtein® in animal diets

    4

    5 6

    7

    8

    9

    10

    11

    13

    15

    20

    22

    23

    26

    2

  • Met

    hane

    CH4

    U-Loo

    p® fermentor plant UniProtein ®

    Manure & m

    eat leftovers Animal products

    A

    nimal

    feed

    Future continuity cycle

    3

  • Unibio is a Danish biotechnology company with a core focus on fermentation technologies, allowing a highly scalable production of bacterial protein meal. Since its foundation the company’s goal has been to supply the world with innovative sustainable solutions to overcome the food challenge faced by the growing global population. With the use of Unibio’s biotechnological innovations the company is able to transform processes that occur in nature every day into a bioindustrial setting and produce healthy sustainable protein for animals in an eco-friendly way.

    Unibio owns the intellectual property rights to a unique fermentation technology – the U-Loop® technology – producing a high-value bacterial protein product, UniProtein®. This novel protein source disrupts the traditional food value chain while mitigating the traditional challenges by decoupling protein production from the fluctuating agriculture and stressed fishing industries. Crop land can thus be used to produce food for humans instead of feed for animals.

    UniProtein® is a sustainable solution to the world’s protein-scarcity challenge.

    About Unibio

    4

  • The concept

    Cooling water

    Fed into the fermentor:-Air-Methane-Minerals-Oxygen-Catalysts

    Viscous protein broth is sprayed out

    Propeller pump keeps the liquid moving

    Temperature is held at 45”C

    Hot air from the bottom of the fermentor dries the broth, turns itinto protein granule and makes it fall to the bottom

    Protein granules are excellent animal feed

    Separator separates water from the protein broth

    Drying tower

    Carbon dioxide and unused nitrogen from the air are let out

    Separator

    Process:Bacteria eat methane, and the liquid is transformed to protein broth

    This process occurs in nature every day e.g. in lakes

    U-Loop® fermentor

    5

  • The U-Loop® technology

    The U-Loop® technology provides optimal growth conditions for the bacteria. The tailor-made technology speeds up the natural process significantly while allowing the execution of the procedure in a controlled and monitored environment. Unibio has developed a vertical fermentor design that can handle a large volumetric gas fraction, significantly improving the average productivity. The technology has been developed in cooperation with the Technical University of Denmark (DTU) after more than 30 years of R&D and is patented under process patent No PA199900690.

    The U-Loop® fermentor allows for a much more energy-efficient transport of nutrients from gas phase into liquid phase, at a much higher rate compared to conventional bioreactors.

    0

    0,5

    1

    1,5

    2

    2,5

    3

    10.80.60.40.2

    Conventional Bioreactor U-Loop®Normalized energy consumption

    Norm

    alize

    d nu

    trien

    t tra

    nsfe

    r rat

    e

    Conventional bioreactor U-Loop®

    0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

    3

    2.5

    2

    1.5

    1

    0.5

    0

    6

  • UniProtein®

    is well suited as a protein feed material for livestockis a free-flowing reddish-brown granule with a particle size of 150-200μmhas a consistent chemical composition and protein contenthas a long shelf lifedoes not contain genetically modified microorganisms (non-GMO)is a non-polluting product as it is produced by a microbial culture with methaneis free from toxins, dioxin and heavy metals due to the controlled production process and thefact that all minerals used are food gradeaddresses the world’s growing need for animal protein, which will continue to increasein line with population growthis produced without using any pesticides or fertilizersis weather-independentproduction does not require any arable land and utilizes a minimum amount of water

    UniProtein® was approved for animal nutrition in the EU in July 1995 according to Commission Directive 95/33/EC. Under EU Commission Regulation No 68/2013 of 16 January 2013, UniProtein® is listed on the catalogue of feed materials (under 12.1.2: Protein from Methylococcus capsulatus (Bath), Alcaligenes acidovorans, Bacillus brevis and Bacillus firmus).

    UniProtein® is a brand-specific bacterial protein meal. It is a protein-rich biomass produced by a microbial culture with methane as the sole carbon and energy source.

    UniProtein® contains the following four heat-killed bacteria:

    The production process always results in a uniform product.

    M. capsulatus Single cell protein

    The substrates for making UniProtein® are: a nitrogen source (ammonia), an energy source (methane or methanol), minerals and oxygen.

    Methylococcus capsulatus (90%) (NCIMB strain 11132)Ralstonia sp. (8%) (NCIMB strain 13287, formerly known as Alcaligenes acidovorans)Aneurinibacillus danicus (1%) (NCIMB strain 13288, formerly known as Bacillus brevis)Bacillus firmus (1%) (NCIMB strain 13288)

    Minerals

    Ammonia

    Oxygen

    Methane

    UniProtein®

    7

  • UniProtein® in the protein demand chain

    Protein is the building block of all life and essential for the growth of cells and tissue repair.The growing meat consumption triggers an increasing demand for animal husbandry and aquaculture which in turn require more animal feed and consequently sufficient crude protein.Unibio offers a unique alternative to existing sources of protein for animal feed by the use of an abundant raw material, methane.

    Fish

    Chicken

    Eggs and dairy

    Cattle

    Pigs

    Fish

    Chicken

    Pets

    Compound feed

    Soybean meal

    Fishmeal

    Other

    By-products

    Agriculture

    Fishing

    Rendering

    Methane

    Pet food

    Pork

    Beef

    MeatAnimal

    husbandryand aquaculture

    Animal feed Crude protein Raw materials

    UniProtein®

    Imagine a future where the world’s protein supply is partly covered by a technology enabling methane to be turned into protein by bacterial fermentation

    8

  • Environmentally friendly production

    0

    1000

    2000

    3000

    4000

    5000

    6000

    Unipr

    otein

    ®

    Whe

    at

    Sunf

    lower

    seed

    Soyb

    ean

    Rape

    seed

    Potat

    oes

    Pea,

    gree

    n

    Oat

    Maize

    Faba

    bean

    Barle

    y

    0200400600800

    1000120014001600180020002200240026002800300032003400

    UniPr

    otein

    ®2

    Sunf

    lower

    seed

    s

    Rape

    seed

    s

    Soy b

    eans

    Peas

    , dryOat

    Maize

    Barle

    y

    Whe

    a t

    1Global land useLand use varies significantly depending on the geographical location where the crops are cultivated.

    Land use1 of typically used feed ingredients in animal diets

    Total water1 footprint of typically used ingredients in animal diets

    m3 / t

    m2 / t

    1Global total water consumption. 2The total water consumption (4.6 m³/t) is equal to blue water consumption during the production of UniProtein®. Total water consumption includes green, blue and grey water consumption.

    Methane O2, phosphoric acid, ammonia

    Main inputs By-products

    Clean waterand limited CO2

    Components of the production process

    The production of UniProtein® results in:

    Minimal use of water (which is also a by-product)12 x output per hectare of arable land compared to soybean mealNo need for pesticides

    Uniform qualityStorage stabilityRegular supply at fixed prices

    High % of crude protein and targeted amino acidsEnvironmentally friendly productModifiability to different animal groups

    6000

    5000

    4000

    3000

    2000

    1000

    0

    3400320030002800260024002200200018001600140012001000

    800600400200

    0

    Barle

    y

    Barle

    y

    Faba

    bean

    sMa

    ize

    MaizeOa

    t

    Oat

    Gree

    n pea

    s

    Peas

    Potat

    oes

    Rape

    seed

    s

    Rape

    seed

    s

    Soyb

    eans

    Soyb

    eans

    Whe

    at

    Whe

    at

    UniPr

    otein

    ®

    UniPr

    otein

    ®2

    Sunfl

    ower

    seed

    s

    Sunfl

    ower

    seed

    s

    “The simulation results from a leading feed optimization software manufacturer showed that when UniProtein® was added by up to 5% of the total piglet feed weight, 6.5% less soybean meal was required. This alone resulted in a reduction of 250 kg CO2 eq. / tonne of feed. This equals to driving a car from Southern Denmark to Venice, Italy, for just one tonne of feed”. Lorie Hamelin, October 2015Senior Scientist and PhD, Institute of Soil Science and Plant Cultivation, Department of Bioeconomy and Systems Analysis, Poland

    9

  • Compound(dry matter - DM¹)

    Meanvalues

    Crude protein (N x 6.25) 72.9%

    Crude fat 9.1%Ash 550 8.6%N-free extracts 7.6%Nucleic acids

    Ribonucleic acid (RNA) 6.7%Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) 2.3%

    Sugars(after acid digestion)

    Glucose 4.5%Other monosaccharides

  • Seven reasons to use UniProtein® in animal diets

    2. Ideal amino acid profileUniProtein® has an ideal amino acid (AA) profile. UniProtein® has a higher concentration (% of CP) of valine, tryptophan, isoleucine and leucine compared to fishmeal. In the rest of the essential AAs there are minor differences between UniProtein® and average data for fishmeal and SBM.

    AA = Amino acidCP = Crude proteinDM = Dry matterSBM = Soybean meal1 The low lysine content of UniProtein® can easily be addressed by adding feed-grade lysine to complete diets

    Source of values for fishmeal and SBM: http://www.feedipedia.org

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    Soybean meal, CP 53.5 (% DM) (dehulled)Fishmeal, CP 70.6 (% DM)UniProtein®, CP 72.9 (% DM)

    ValTyrTrpThrSerProPheMetLys1LeuIleHisGlyGluCysAspArgAla

    The content of AAs (% of CP) of UniProtein® in comparison with fishmeal and SBM

    UniProtein®, CP 72.9 (% DM) Fishmeal, CP 70.6 (% DM) SBM, CP 53.5 (% DM) (dehulled)

    201816

    141210

    86420

    Ala Arg Asp Cys Glu Gly His Ile Leu Lys1 Met Phe Pro Ser Thr Trp Tyr Val

    DM = Dry matter

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    Soybean meal (dehulled)FishmealUniProtein®

    Crude protein (% of DM)8070

    60

    50

    40

    3020

    10

    0

    UniProtein® Fishmeal Soybean meal (dehulled)

    1. Competitive protein contentThe crude protein (CP) content of UniProtein® is superior to soybean meal (SBM) and comparable to fishmeal.

    The crude protein content of UniProtein® in comparison to fishmeal (60-68% CP as fed) or SBM.

    11

  • 3. Low ash and mineral contentThe ash and mineral content of UniProtein®, particularly phosphorus and calcium, is low compared to fishmeal. This makes UniProtein® the ideal protein compound to incorporate into animal feed when a high protein content and a low mineral and ash content are required.

    4. Valuable fatty acid profileThe fatty acid profile of UniProtein® consists primarily of saturated C16:0 and monounsaturated C16:1 fatty acids representing approx. 85% of total fatty acids (TFA). Results of experiments indicate that the fatty acid profile of UniProtein® results in good oxidative stability of frozen pork and chicken meat.

    5. UniProtein® is rich in B vitaminsB vitamins are water-soluble and are not stored in the tissues in appreciable amounts. Their regular supply is essential.

    6. Neutral flavour UniProtein® has a neutral taste. The palatability of diets including UniProtein® has been shown to be as well accepted as that of diets including typical protein sources.

    7. Utilization and digestibilityThe digestibility of protein and AAs of UniProtein® diets and the retention of nitrogen (N) of animals on UniProtein® diets in the experiments have been comparable to the control diets. The main protein source in the control diets has been either fishmeal or SBM.

    The ash, calcium and phosphorus contents (% of DM) of UniProtein® in comparison with conventional-commodity fishmeal with a CP content of 70.6% of DM.

    Source of values for fishmeal and SBM: http://www.feedipedia.org

    DM = Dry matter

    Ash, calcium and phosphorus (% of DM)

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    FishmealUniProtein®

    PhosphorusCalciumAsh

    UniProtein® Fishmeal

    201816141210

    86420

    Ash Calcium Phosphorus

    12

  • UniProtein® in pig diets

    Impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the retention of nitrogen (N) and heat energy

    PerformanceThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on pig performance

    Nutrient metabolism

    Average daily gain1, g

    N Retention, g/kg 0.75 per day

    N = Nitrogen

    Heat energy, kJ/kg 0.75 per day

    0

    100

    200

    300

    400

    500

    600

    700

    800

    900

    UniProtein® 10%UniProtein® 5%UniProtein® 0%

    1 from weanling (11.4 kg) to slaughter (107.2 kg)

    The average daily gain (ADG), average daily feed intake and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were similar among diets including UniProtein® from 0% to 10%.

    Increased levels of UniProtein® were balanced by a reduction of protein derived from SBM.

    Source: Øverland et al. 2004, Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 3:323-336

    UniProtein® incorporated by up to 15% into pig diets maintained the good N retention and showed no adverse effects on heat energy. Increased levels of UniProtein® were balanced by a reduction of protein derived from SBM.Source: Hellwing et al. 2007, Animal 1:45-54

    0,0

    0,5

    1,0

    1,5

    UniProtein® 15%

    UniProtein® 10%

    UniProtein® 5%

    UniProtein® 0%

    0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    UniProtein® 15%

    UniProtein® 10%

    UniProtein® 5%

    UniProtein® 0%

    900

    1.5 800

    800

    1.0600

    700

    0.5

    400

    600

    0.0

    200

    0

    500400300200100

    0

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®5%

    UniProtein®5%

    UniProtein®5%

    UniProtein®10%

    UniProtein®10%

    UniProtein®10%

    UniProtein®15%

    UniProtein®15%

    13

  • UniProtein® in pig diets

    Meat qualityThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the quality of frozen pork

    PUFA, % of TFA in backfat

    Fat firmness1

    Rancid taste1

    PUFA = Polyunsaturated fatty acidsTFA = Total fatty acids

    1 On a scale from 1 (poorest) to 9 (best)

    1 On a scale from 1 (poorest) to 15 (best)

    Increased levels of UniProtein® in the diets decreased the ratio of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) to total fatty acids (TFA) in backfat and led to better oxidative stability of frozen pork as shown by the improved rancid taste.Increased levels of UniProtein® were balanced by a reduction of protein derived from SBM.

    Source: Øverland et al. 2005, Meat Sci. 71:719–729

    The increased levels of UniProtein® in the diets improved fat firmness in a linear manner.Increased levels of UniProtein® were balanced by a reduction of protein derived from SBM.

    Source: Øverland et al. 2004, Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 3:323-336

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    UniProtein® 15%UniProtein® 10%UniProtein® 5%UniProtein® 0%

    1

    1,1

    1,2

    1,3

    1,4

    1,5

    1,6

    UniProtein® 15%UniProtein® 10%UniProtein® 5%UniProtein® 0%

    UniProtein® 15%UniProtein® 10%UniProtein® 5%UniProtein® 0%

    10

    11

    12

    13

    14

    15

    20

    15

    1.618

    14

    1.516

    13

    1.414

    12

    11

    10

    1.312

    1.2

    10

    1.1

    8

    1

    6420

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®5%

    UniProtein®5%

    UniProtein®5%

    UniProtein®10%

    UniProtein®10%

    UniProtein®10%

    UniProtein®15%

    UniProtein®15%

    UniProtein®15%

    14

  • UniProtein® in broiler diets

    The impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on broiler performance when replacing SBM Performance

    The impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the amino acid digestibility of diets when replacing SBMDigestibility

    AA = Amino acidAID = Apparent ileal digestibility1 Measured at day 32

    The apparent ileal digestibilities (AID) of amino acids were unaffected or improved when UniProtein® replaced SBM in the diets.

    Source: Schøyen et al. 2007, Arch. Anim. Nutr. 61:276-291

    The body weight and feed intake were similar among the diets including UniProtein® from 0% to 12%. The FCR was statistically similar among the diets. However, UniProtein® inclusion resulted in the numerical improvement of FCR compared to the control diet.

    Source: Øverland et al. 2010, Br. Poult. Sci. 51:686-695

    UniProtein® 12%

    UniProtein® 8%

    UniProtein® 4%

    UniProtein® 0%

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    UniProtein® 12%

    UniProtein® 8%

    UniProtein® 4%

    UniProtein® 0%

    1,1

    1,2

    1,3

    1,4

    1,5

    1,6

    0,0

    0,1

    0,2

    0,3

    0,4

    0,5

    0,6

    0,7

    0,8

    0,9

    1,0

    UniProtein®6%

    UniProtein® 4%

    UniProtein® 2%

    UniProtein® 0%

    ValTrpThrPheMetLysLeuIleHisArg

    Body weight1, g

    FCR = Feed conversion ratio1 day 0 - day 32

    1 day 32

    FCR1, g feed/g weight gain

    Coefficients of AID of essential AAs in diets1

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®2%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®6%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®8%

    UniProtein®8%

    UniProtein®12%

    UniProtein®12%

    2500 1.6

    2000 1.5

    1500 1.4

    1000 1.3

    500 1.2

    0 1.1

    Arg His Ile Leu Lys Met Phe Thr Trp Val

    1.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.1

    0

    15

  • UniProtein® in broiler diets

    Meat qualityThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the quality of chicken meat when replacing SBM

    UniProtein® decreased the ratio of PUFA to TFA in chicken fat, reduced the level of oxidative products in frozen meat and had no adverse effects on the several sensory quality parameters related to odour and flavour.

    Source: Øverland et al. 2011, Poult. Sci. 90:201-210.

    1 in the thigh meat after 6 months of storage at −18°C2µg/g ×103µg/g

    PUFA = Polyunsaturated fatty acidsTFA = Total fatty acids

    38

    39

    40

    41

    42

    43

    44

    45

    UniProtein® 12%UniProtein® 8%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 0%

    0

    0,005

    0,01

    0,015

    0,02

    0,025

    0,03

    0,035

    Heptanaldehyde3Hexanaldehyde3Butyraldehyde2UniProtein® 12%UniProtein® 8%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 0%

    PUFA, % of TFA Oxidative products1

    Butyraldehyde2 Hexanaldehyde3 Heptanaldehyde3

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®8%

    UniProtein®8%

    UniProtein®12%

    UniProtein®12%

    45 0.035

    44 0.03

    43 0.025

    42 0.02

    41 0.015

    40 0.01

    39 0.005

    38 0

    16

  • UniProtein® in broiler diets

    PerformanceThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on broiler performance when replacing fishmeal

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    UniProtein® 6%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 2%UniProtein® 0%

    0

    0,5

    1

    1,5

    2

    UniProtein® 6%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 2%UniProtein® 0%

    Body weight, feed intake and FCR were similar among the diets including UniProtein® from 0% to 6%.Source: Schøyen et al. 2007, Arch. Anim. Nutr. 61:276-291

    DigestibilityThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the amino acid digestibility of diets when replacing fishmeal

    0,0

    0,1

    0,2

    0,3

    0,4

    0,5

    0,6

    0,7

    0,8

    0,9

    1,0

    ValTrpThrPheMetLysLeuIleHisArg

    UniProtein®6%

    UniProtein® 4%

    UniProtein® 2%

    UniProtein® 0%

    AID = Apparent ileal digestibility AA = Amino acid 1 Measured at day 32

    The AIDs of amino acids were unaffected when UniProtein® replaced fishmeal in the diets.

    Source: Schøyen et al. 2007, Arch. Anim. Nutr. 61:276-291

    Body weight1, g FCR1, kg feed/kg body weight gain

    Coefficients of AID of essential AAs in the diets1

    1 day 32 FCR = Feed conversion ratio 1 day 0 - day 32

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®2%

    UniProtein®2%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®6%

    UniProtein®6%

    2000 2

    1500 1.5

    1000 1

    500 0.5

    0 0

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®2%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®6%

    Arg His Ile Leu Lys Met Phe Thr Trp Val

    1.00.9

    0.8

    0.7

    0.6

    0.5

    0.4

    0.3

    0.2

    0.10

    17

  • The impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the protein and energy metabolism

    UniProtein® in broiler diets

    Nutrient metabolism

    The values of retained N and heat energy were similar among the diets including UniProtein® from 0% to 6% of diet. Increased levels of UniProtein® were balanced by a reduction of protein derived from fishmeal.

    Source: Hellwing et al. 2006, Arch. Anim. Nutr. 60:365-281

    1,0

    1,1

    1,2

    1,3

    1,4

    1,5

    1,6

    1,7

    UniProtein® 6%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 2%UniProtein® 0%0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    UniProtein® 6%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 2%UniProtein® 0%

    N retention, g /kg 0.75 per day

    N = Nitrogen

    Heat energy, kJ/kg 0.75 per day

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®2%

    UniProtein®2%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®6%

    UniProtein®6%

    1.7 1000

    1.6800

    1.56001.4

    4001.3

    2001.2

    1.1

    1.0 0

    18

  • UniProtein® in broiler diets

    Replacing fishmeal by UniProtein® in the diet improved the sensory quality of frozen-stored chicken meat as shown by the less intense off-odour and off-flavour and increased the juiciness of frozen meat. The off-odour and off-flavour decreased, and juiciness increased numerically when UniProtein® replaced SBM in the diet.

    Source: Schøyen et al. 2007, Arch. Anim. Nutr. 61:276-291

    1 On a scale from 1 (no intensity) to 9 (high intensity)2175 freeze-stored days

    1 On a scale from 1 (no intensity) to 9 (high intensity)2 175 freeze-stored days

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    UniProtein® 6%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 2%UniProtein® 0%

    Off-odour and off-flavour1,2

    Meat qualityThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the quality of chicken meat

    Juiciness1,2

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    UniProtein® 6%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 2%UniProtein® 0%

    Off flavourOff odour

    Off-odour Off-flavour

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®2%

    UniProtein®2%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®6%

    UniProtein®6%

    4 5

    3 4

    2 3

    1 2

    0 1

    19

  • UniProtein® in mink diets

    The body weight gain, feed intake and FCR were similar among diets including UniProtein® by 0% to 8%.Increased levels of UniProtein® were balanced by a reduction of protein derived from fishmeal.

    Source: Ahlstrøm et al. 2006, J. Anim. Feed Sci. 15:491-504

    UniProtein® incorporated by up to 8% in the diets improved the total impression of fur quality characteristics compared with the control diet.Increased levels of UniProtein® were balanced by a reduction in protein derived from fishmeal.

    Source: Ahlstrøm et al. 2006, J. Anim. Feed Sci. 15:491-504

    1On a scale from 1 (poorest) to 9 (best)1from 29 June to 26 November (a total of 121 feeding days)

    Body weight gain1, g

    Performance and fur qualityThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on mink performance

    Total impression of fur quality characteristics1

    0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    UniProtein® 8%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 0%1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    UniProtein® 8%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 0%

    Males Females

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®8%

    UniProtein®8%

    2500 7

    2000 6

    15005

    10004

    500

    3

    0

    2

    1

    20

  • UniProtein® in mink diets

    Nutrient metabolism and digestibilityThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on N retention and the digestibility of N and AAs in the diet

    0,0

    0,2

    0,4

    0,6

    0,8

    1,0

    1,2

    1,4

    UniProtein® 8%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 0%

    N retention, g/d

    Coefficients of ATTD of AAs in the diet

    N digestibility, %

    N = Nitrogen

    AA = Amino acidATTD = Apparent total tract digestibility

    0

    20

    40

    60

    80

    100

    UniProtein® 8%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 0%

    UniProtein® incorporated by up to 8% into male mink diets maintained the good retention and digestibility of N.Increased levels of UniProtein® were balanced by a reduction in protein derived from fishmeal.

    Source: Ahlstrøm et al. 2006, J. Anim. Feed Sci. 15:491-504

    UniProtein® incorporated by up to 14.7% into mink diets maintained the good apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of main nutrients and AAs.Increased levels of UniProtein® were balanced by a reduction in protein derived from fishmeal.

    Source: Øverland et al. 2006, Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 129:237-2510,0

    0,1

    0,2

    0,3

    0,4

    0,5

    0,6

    0,7

    0,8

    0,9

    1,0

    UniProtein® 14.7%UniProtein® 7.35%UniProtein® 0%

    ValTrpThrPheMetLysLeuIleHisArg

    UniProtein® 0%

    UniProtein® 7.35%

    UniProtein® 14.7%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®8%

    UniProtein®8%

    1.4 100

    1.280

    1.0

    0.8 60

    0.6 40

    0.2 200.4

    0 0

    Arg His Ile Leu Lys Met Phe Thr Trp Val

    1.00.90.80.70.60.50.40.30.20.1

    0

    21

  • UniProtein® in blue fox diets

    Nutrient metabolism and digestibilityThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the production performance and diet digestibility in blue foxes.

    The study was conducted to investigate the potential use of UniProtein® in diets of dogs using blue foxes as a model.

    Final body weight1, kgATTD of main nutrients in the diet, %

    Final body weight, overall gain and feed consumption were similar among diets including UniProtein® by 0% to 12%.

    The ATTDs of main nutrients were similar among the diets including UniProtein® from 0% to 12%.Source: Skrede and Ahlstrøm 2002, J. Nutr. 132: 1668S–1669S

    The ATTD of crude protein

    The ATTD of crude fat

    The ATTD of crude carbohydrate

    0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    UniProtein® 12%UniProtein® 8%UniProtein® 4%UniProtein® 0%

    ATTD = Apparent total tract digestibility

    1at 5 December

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®4%

    UniProtein®8%

    UniProtein®8%

    UniProtein®12%

    UniProtein®12%

    12100

    1080

    8

    660

    220

    440

    00

    22

  • PerformanceThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the performance of Atlantic salmon when replacing fishmeal

    UniProtein® in aqua diets

    In a 12-month experiment the salmon (at age of 112 days) fed the diet containing 5% UniProtein® weighed significantly more than salmon fed the fishmeal-based control diet, while salmon fed the diets containing more UniProtein® reached the same weight as the control group.

    The salmon (at age of 364 days) fed the diet containing 19.3% UniProtein® ended up with a higher final weight than salmon fed the fishmeal-based control diet or the diets including less UniProtein®. Specific growth rate and survival of fish fed up to 19.3% UniProtein® were similar among diets during the entire experiment.

    Source: Storebakken et al. 2004, Aquaculture, 241:413-425

    1day 112 1day 364

    1day 52

    300

    310

    320

    330

    340

    350

    360

    370

    UniProtein® 27%

    UniProtein® 18%

    UniProtein® 9%

    UniProtein® 4.5%

    UniProtein® 0%

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    UniProtein® 19.3%UniProtein® 9.9%UniProtein® 5%UniProtein® 0%

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    UniProtein® 19.3%UniProtein® 9.9%UniProtein® 5%UniProtein® 0%

    Body weight1, g

    Final weight1, g Final weight1, g

    UniProtein® improved the body weight of juvenile Atlantic salmon.

    Source: Aas et al. 2006a, Aquaculture, 259:365-376

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®5%

    UniProtein®4.5%

    UniProtein®5%

    UniProtein®9.9%

    UniProtein®9%

    UniProtein®9.9%

    UniProtein®19.3%

    UniProtein®18%

    UniProtein®27%

    UniProtein®19.3%

    4 50

    340

    230

    1

    20

    10

    0 0

    370

    360

    350

    340

    320

    330

    310

    300

    23

  • UniProtein® in aqua diets

    PerformanceThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the performance of rainbow trout when replacing fishmeal

    The specific growth rate and feed intake of trout were similar among diets including UniProtein® from 0% to 18%. The FCR was similar between the control diet and the diet including 18% UniProtein®, while the FCR of trout on a diet including 9% UniProtein® outperformed the FCR of trout on the control diet or the diet containing 18% UniProtein®.

    Source: Aas et al. 2006b, Aquaculture, 261:357-368

    1day 76 FCR = feed conversion ratio1day 0 – day 76

    FCR1, g weight gain/g feed Specific growth rate1

    1,0

    1,1

    1,2

    UniProtein® 18%UniProtein® 9%UniProtein® 0%

    1,35

    1,36

    1,37

    1,38

    1,39

    1,40

    1,41

    UniProtein® 18%UniProtein® 9%UniProtein® 0%UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®9%

    UniProtein®9%

    UniProtein®18%

    UniProtein®18%

    1.411.2

    1.40

    1.39

    1.381.1

    1.36

    1.37

    1.351.0

    24

  • Nutrient metabolism and digestibilityThe impact of increased inclusion of UniProtein® on the diet digestibility of rainbow trout

    UniProtein® in aqua diets

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    UniProtein® 18%UniProtein® 9%UniProtein® 0%

    AID of N, % AID of energy, %

    N retention (% digested)

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    70

    80

    90

    100

    UniProtein® 18%UniProtein® 9%UniProtein® 0%

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    UniProtein® 18%UniProtein® 9%UniProtein® 0%

    The AIDs of N, energy and AAs in rainbow trout differed slightly among diets including UniProtein® by 0% to 18%.

    The N retention in rainbow trout were similar among diets including UniProtein® by 0% to 18%.Increased levels of UniProtein® were balanced by a reduction in content of protein from fishmeal.

    Source: Aas et al. 2006b, Aquaculture, 261:357-368

    AID = Apparent ileal digestibility N = Nitrogen

    AID = Apparent ileal digestibility

    N = Nitrogen

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®0%

    UniProtein®9%

    UniProtein®9%

    UniProtein®9%

    UniProtein®18%

    UniProtein®18%

    UniProtein®18%

    100 10090 9080 8070 70

    50

    50

    5060

    60

    60

    40

    40

    4030

    30

    3020

    20

    2010

    10

    100

    0

    0

    25

  • Maximum inclusion levels of UniProtein® in animal diets based on initial studies

    The proper use of UniProtein® in animal diets

    1 Based on trials in broilers and considering the low protein content of layers’ diets compared to the diets of broilers2 Based on trials conducted in pigs from approx. 10 kg to 80 – 110 kg3 Based on trial in blue foxes

    Species

    Mink

    Blue fox

    Dog and cat3

    Broiler

    Pig2

    Laying hen1

    Inclusion level (% of diet)

    8

    6

    3

    8

    12

    12

    Rainbow trout 20

    Atlantic salmon 20

    26

  • Global Headquarters

    Unibio International plc.

    2 Royal College Street London NW1 ONH United Kingdom

    +44 (0) 20 7691 [email protected]

    Copenhagen Office

    Unibio

    Diplomvej 381DK-2800 Kgs. Lyngby

    Denmark

    +45 25 75 18 [email protected]

    Unibio

    Niels Bohrs Alle 17 DK-5230 Odense M

    Denmark

    +45 63 10 40 [email protected]

    Administrative Headquarters

    © U

    nibi

    o A/

    S, D

    K 20

    17www.unibiogroup.com

    Turning natural gas into food