Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
THE FRASNIANIFAMENNIAN (MID-LATE DEVONIAN) BOUNDARY IN THE LONG RAPIDS FORMATION,
JAMES BAY LOWLANDS, NORTHERN ONTARIO, CANADA.
Bryan Geoffrey Levman
A thesis subrnitted in conforrnity with the requirernents for the degree of Master of Science Graduate Department of Geology
University of Toronto
O Copyright by Bryan Geoffrey Levman, 2001
National Library 191 ofCanada Bibliothèque nationale du Canada
Acquisitions and Acquisitions et Bibliagraphic Services services bibliographiques 395 W e l i Street 395. nie Wdlington OttawilON KtAONo OüawaûN K 1 A W CaMda Canada
The author has granted a non- exclusive licence allowing the National Library of Canada to reproduce, Ioan, distribute or seil copies of this thesis in microfoxm, paper or electronic formats.
The author retahs ownership of the copyright in this thesis. Neither the thesis nor substantial extracts fiom it may be printed or othewise reproduced without the author's permission.
L'auteur a accordé une Licence non exclusive permettant a la Bibliothèque nationale du Canada de reproduire, prêter, distribuer ou vendre des copies de cette thèse sous la forme de microfiche/füm, de reproduction sur papier ou sur format électronique.
L'auteur conserve la propriété du droit d'auteur qui protège cette thèse. Ni la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement reproduits sans son autorisation.
Abstract
The FrasnianlFamennian (rnid-Late Devonian) Boundary in the Long Rapids Formation,
James Bay Lowlands, Northern Ontario, Canada.
Bryan Geoffrey Levman Degree of Master of Science, 2001
Graduate Department of Geology, University of Toronto
The FrasniadFamennian (mid-Late Devonian) boundary has been located in the
Long Rapids Formation, northem Ontario. utilizing conodont-based biostratigraphy
and geochemistry. It was found in a black shale sequence 11 cm above a limestone
bed that has many simifarities to the Upper Kellwasser Limestone. a lithological
marker for the F/F boundary in Germany, Belgium and France.
There is no evidence for a sudden impact event, and sedimentation across the
boundary is continuous, although there is an erosional discontinuity just betow the
boundary and part of the lower Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone is missing. Strong
positive a13C and a'80 values were identified and are interpreted as evidence of a
m a s mortality in anoxic waters at the tirne of the FrasnianlFamennian extinction, an
event that was also accompanied by a ternperature drop. a% values also indicate
anoxia and a15N values provide evidence of reduced surface water productivity. No
iridium anomaly was found at the boundary.
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank my thesis supervisor, Professor Peter von Bitter, and cornmittee
members Professor Geoff Norris and Professor Andrew Miall for their direction, help
and encouragment in the formulation and completion of this thesis. The isotope
laboratory work was in part funded by an NSERC research grant to Professor Nonis.
For permission to use previously copyrighted material I would like to thank the
Ontario Geological Survey (Figure 1 ), the Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists
(Figure 3) and the Geological Society Publishing House (Figure 13). 1 would also like
to thank Kathy David of the Royal Ontario Museum for her assistance with conodont
processing and a special thanks to my wife who accompanied me several times to
the Long Rapids Formation and helped with the collection of fossil material.
Table of Contents
Introduction ................................................................................................ 1
The Late Devonian FrasniadFamennian (F/F) Extinction Event ............................ 2
Canadian Sections containing F/F Boundary Beds ............................................. 4
......................................................................................... Regional Setting -7
The Long Rapids Formation ........................................................................ 10
Conodont Biostratigraphy ........................................................................... -13
The FrasnianlFamennian boundary in the Long Rapids Formation type section ...... 15
The Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone ............................................................... 19
Sedimentation Rate .................................................................................. -23
Conodont Taxonomy ................................................................................. 26
Conodont 'Pearls'. ...................................................................................... 33
Biofacies ................................................................................................ -35
Global Correlations ................................................................................... -37
........................................................................................... Geochemist ry -43
Trace Elements ................................................................................ -44
Iridium ............................................................................................ -46
........................................................................................... Carbon -47
Nitrogen .......................................................................................... -51
Oxygen ........................................................................................... -52
........................................................................................... Sulphur -55
Duration of the F/F Event ............................................................................ 58
Discussion .............................................................................................. -59
Summary.. .............................................................................................. -66
Systematic Palaeontology .......................................................................... -71
References.. .......................................................................................... -1 O1
List of Figures
Figure 1 : Location of Long Rapids Formation type section
in the Moose River Basin, northern Ontario, Canada ............................ ..6
Figure 2: Aerial view of Long Rapids Formation type section ................................ 8
Figure 3. Palaeozoic and Mesozoic stratigraphic units
in the Moose River Basin.. .............................................................. ..9
Figure 4: Top of Williams Island Formation type section and Long Rapids Formation
type section, stratigraphic column and location of samples.. .................. 12
Figure 5: Photo of FrasniadFamennian boundary strata
in the Long Rapids Formation type section.. ...................................... .17
Figure 6: Detailed sampling regime in the F/F boundary interval.. ........................ 18
Figure 7: Range chart of Palmatolepid conodonts in topmost portion of
Williams Island Formation type section and al1 of
Long Rapids Formation type section ................................................ ..20
Figure 8: Lag layer from base of unit 24 (Sample 20),
Long Rapids Formation type section.. .............................................. .22
Figure 9: lnferred evolutionary relationship
of five morphologically similar Palarntolepid species.. ........................... 28
Figure 10: Comparison of average element size in four related
Palmatolepid species recovered.. ................................................. ..29
Figure 11 : Percentage of conodont Pa elements by Genus. ............................... 36
Figure 12: Comparison of Long Rapids Fm. type section and Hony (Belgium).
Sinsin (Belgium). and Steinbruch Schmidt (Germany)
FIF boundary sections.. ............................................................... .39
Figure 1 3: Late Devonian (Famennian) palaeogeography
and location of F/F sections.. ........................................................ .40
Figure 14: Comparison of Long Rapids Formation type section and Sessacker
trench carbonate strata just below the F/F boundary .......................... 42
Figure 15: Percentage composition carbon and carbon isotope ratios
in the F/F boundary strata, Long Rapids Fm. type section.. ................. .50
Figure 16: Oxygen and nitrogen isotope ratios in the FIF boundary strata,
Long Rapids Fm. type section ..................................................... ..53
Figure 17: Percentage composition sulphur and sulphur isotope ratios
in the F/F boundary strata, Long Rapids Fm. type section.. ................. .57
List of Plates
Plate 1.. ................................................................................................ -126
Plate 2.. ................................................................................................ -128
Plate 3.. ............................................................................................... ,130
List of Tables
Table 1: Selective Geochemical Sampling of the Long Rapids
Formation type section.. ............................................................... .132
Graph of Data from Table 1 ........................................................................ 133
Table 2: Conodont Distribution Data for Range Chart ..................................... -134
Table 3: Cornparison of Average Conodont Size ............................................ 135
Table 4: Whole Rock Analysis of Boundary Strata .......................................... 136
Graph of Data from Table 4 ........................................................................ 137
Table 5: Trace Elernent Analysis of Boundary Strata ....................................... 138
........................................................................ Graph of Data from Table 5 139
Table 6: Trace Element Analysis of Boundary Strata ....................................... 140
.......................................................................... Table 7: t ridium Content -141
............................................................. Graph of Data from Tables 6 and 7 142
vii
Introduction
Extinction events have fascinated scientists for the last two centuries. In question
are some fundamental issues about life that have interested scientists since
Georges Cuvier, Charles Darwin and Charles Lyell: does evolution proceed
gradually or uniformly (Lyell, 1830. 1832; Darwin, 1859) or by fits and bounds
(Cuvier, 181 2; Eldredge and Gould, 1 972: Ager, 1 993)? Do extinctions happen
because of maladaptation to a gradually changing environment (Dawkins, 1988), or
the 'bad luck' of being in the wrong place at the wrong time (Raup, 1991)?
For decades Charles Darwin's and Charles Lyell's unifonnitarian views held sway;
however, by the 1970s credible altemate models were being proposed (McLaren,
IWO; Eldredge and Gould, 1972). The Late Devonian FrasnianlFamennian mass
extinction was first quantified by Newell (1 967), and McLaren (1 970) suggested that
the extinction event was caused by a bolide impact, creating global marine turbidity,
decimating the shallow water benthos. McLaren challenged geologists to precisely
define what happened at these major faunal turnovers, because they fom the basis
for calibrating geological time.
3 - Alvarez et al. (1980) found enriched levels of siderophile elements such as Ni, Co,
Pt, and Ir (that are concentrated in iron meteorites and the earth's mantle) at the
Cretaceous-Tertiary Boundary in ltaly and Denmark. They hypothesized that this
was the residue of a carbonaceous chondrite that hit the earth, pulverized and
diffused into the atmosphere; this blocked the sunlight to such an extent that
photosynthesis was suppressed for several years, disrupting the marine and
terrestrial food supply and causing a major extinction event. Subsequently a great
deal of scientific research has been conducted to test the irnpactlkill hypothesis at al1
the extinction events of the Phanerozoic, including the FrasniadFamennian.
The Late Devonian FrasniadFamennian (WF) Extinction Event
The Late Devonian is divided into two stages, the Frasnian and Famennian (Harland
et al.. 1990). Based on conodont biochronology, Sandberg and Ziegler (1 996)
hypothesized that the duration of the Frasnian was approximately 5 million years,
from 369 to 364 m.y.a. and the duration of the Famennian approximately 10 million
years, from 364 to 354 m.y.a. (contra Harland et al., [1990] who effectively reversed
these figures, i.e. the Famennian and Frasnian equalled 4 and 10 million years,
respectively). At the FrasniadFamennian boundary, an enorrnous drop in species
3
diversity has been document& (Newell, 1967; Sepkoski, 1986; McGhee, 1996) with
up to three-quarters of al1 species on earth disappearing, making it one of the 'big
five' extinction events in the Phanerozoic. Major groups affected include rugose and
tabulate corals, stromatoporoids, ammonoids. trilobites, foraminiferids, conodonts,
fishes and land plants. Numerous F/F boundary sections around the world have
been studied in North America, Australia, Europe, North Africa and Asia and most
researchers agree that anoxia, probably caused by oceanic overturn, was an
immediate cause of the extinction of manne animals. During oceanic overtum the
density stratification of the ocean is disrupted and poisonous, sulphide nch anoxic
bottom waters rise to the surface, destroying manne habitats (McGhee, 1996). Some
suggest the triggenng mechanism resulted from a bolide impact (Sandberg et al.,
1 988, McLaren and Goodfellow, 1 990; Geldsetzer et al., 1993; Wang et al., 1 996);
others suggest that tectonic forces were ultimately responsible (Schindler, 1990a. b;
Racki, 1998a, b). Other possible killing mechanisms include climatic cooling
(Copper, 1986, 1 998); warrning (Thornpson and Newton, 1988); eustatic sea level
changes (Qiang, 1989, Muchez et al., 1 996); and toxic eutrophication caused by
hydrothennal megaplumes (Racki, 1998a), or increased nverine nutnent flux (Algeo
4
et al., 1995). Many of these causes may be interrelated, possibly in a complex
fashion. This will be explored in greater detail below.
This study focuses on a FrasniadFamennian section in the Long Rapids Formation
type section, located in a remote part of northem Ontario south of James Bay. The
section was visited over three successive surnrners during 1997-1 999 and the
biostratigraphy gradually refined using conodont biochronology to isolate the faunal
turnover by which the F/F boundary is recognized (Klapper et ab, 1993). The
stratigraphic level of the boundary was later confirmed using geochemical and
isotopic tests. Iridium was also analyzed for so as to ascertain whether there was
any evidence for a sudden catastrophic impact event, and to understand the sudden
or gradua1 nature of the boundary change. The Long Rapids Formation data was
then compared with that from other key sections around the world.
Canadian Sections containina F/F Boundarv Beds
Three other known Canadian sections contain the FrasniadFamennian boundary:
Trout River, Northwest Territories, a platfon carbonate shelf deposit (Orchard,
1988; Geldsetzer et al., 1993) where, however, the lowest Palmatolepis triangularis
5
Zone that defines the base of the Famennian is missing; Cinquefoil Mountain. a
carbonate upper-slope sequence near Jasper, Alberta; and Medicine Lake, an inter-
reef basinal setting, also near Jasper (Wang et al., 1996). The boundary may also
be present in the Besa River Shale of northeast British Columbia (Pelzer, 1966). In
Ontario, the boundary may also occur in the Kettle Point Formation of southwestern
Ontario (Winder, 1966).
The Long Rapids Formation type section is located about 25 km north of the
hydroelectric dam at Otter Rapids and about 1 km south of Williams Island on the
Abitibi River, about 760 km north of Toronto. It is most easily accessible by canoe or
helicopter (Figure 1 ). GPS data indicate that the formation outcrops at 500, 23'. 25"
N, 81 O, 3 4 , 15" W (UTM 598826) and extends south-southwest along the river bank
to 50". 23' 08" N, 810, 34'. 46" W (UTM 595822). Since the Abitibi River is a major
drainage channel for the James Bay Lowlands, water level of the river can Vary
significantly each summer, depending upon precipitation and damming by the
hydroelectric facility at Otter Rapids. Since the river is flooded at unpredictable
times to generate hydroelectnc power for urban centres to the south, sampling
conditions are quite difficult and even dangerous, as water levels rise very fast.
Figure 1: Location of Long Rapids Formation type section, in the Moose River Basin, northem Ontario, Canada. Modified from Ontario Geological Survey, 1991.
Paleozoic and Mesozoic Depositional Sequences and Events in Ontario. Map 2582. Figure 1. (Thurstone et al., 1991). Used with permission.
The boundary beds outcrop at the northem end of the section (location "û" in Figure
2). This is the type section of the Long Rapids Formation; the formation is also
known frorn core (Sanderson and Telford. 1985) the conodonts of which are
currently being studied by Drs. Gilbert Klapper and Tom Uyeno of the University of
Iowa and the Geological Survey of Canada, respectively.
Regional Setting
The Long Rapids Formation was deposited in the Moose River Basin, an
intracratonic downwarping caused by horizontal transmission of stresses from the
plate-margin Appalachian orogenic collision-event (Williams et ai., 1992; Sanford.
1987). The Basin underlies an area of about 100,000 km2 and contains
approximately 700 m of Middle Ordovician to Upper Devonian strata, consisting
chiefly of manne carbonates, shales, evaporites and minor manne and continental
clastic rocks (Telford, 1988) (Figure 3). The Long Rapids Formation is the youngest
Palaeozoic lithostratigraphic unit in the Basin and represents the last recorded
manne transgression in the area (Sanford, 1987). Following regression, the Long
Rapids Formation was subjected to extensive tectonism. including faulting. folding
Air Photo from Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, 94-50 1 3 1 6-269
Figure 2: Aerial v i e ~ of Long Rapids Formation type section A = Top of exposed Long Rapids Formation, B = F/F boundary outcrop, C = Base of L m Rapids Fornation,
D = Top of exposed Long Rapids Fomiatim
ORDOVICIAN SlLURl AN DEVONIAN
1 UPPER LOWER 1 UPPER LOWER 1 MIDDLE
10
and ultramafic intrusion (Acres International Ltd., 1989); at least one dyke, just
upstream at Coral Rapids, was dated as Late JurassicIEarly Cretaceous (Sanford
and Norris, 1975).
The Long Rapids Formation
The Long Rapids Formation is the lithostratigraphic, but not necessarily the
chronostratigraphic equivalent of other Upper Devonian organic-rich black shales of
eastem North America such as the Ohio, New Albany, Chattanooga and Antrirn
shales of the United States. In southwestem Ontario, the correlative unit is the Kettle
Point Formation (Telford, 1988). The basinal setting, shale lithology and the
conodont fauna suggest that the Long Rapids Formation was deposited in a lower
dope environment. In core, the Long Rapids Formation is up to 79.3 m thick
(Sanderson and Telford, 1985), but in outcrop oniy about 35 metres are exposed
(contra Bezys and Risk, 1990; contra Bezys, 1991 ; Norris et al., 1992).
Although younger than the underlying Williams Island Formation, the Long Rapids
Formation at the type locality is topographically lower because of an anticline and/or
fault that has pushed the Williams Island Formation higher (Sanford and Norris,
1975). The formation outcrops on the flanks of the southwest plunging Williams
Island dome and dips southeast. The upper beds repeat at the beginning and end of
the outcrop due to folding (Figure 2). Overlying the shales and carbonates of the
Long Rapids Formation are Mesozoic sediments of lacustrine and fluviatile origin
(Norris, 1 986).
The Long Rapids Formation type section consists of altemating green mudstone and
black shale beds containing up to twelve thin carbonate interbeds, incfuding three
containing massive concretions (Figure 4). The concretions are similar to those
found in the Kettle Point Formation of southem Ontario (Cameron and Coniglio,
1990), consisting of a dolomite micritic matrix infilled with coarser calcite and
dolomite; some have septarian structure in the centre. The carbonate beds of the
Long Rapids Formation type section have been dolomitized and show dark organic
staining in a lighter medium gray matrix, indicating a reducing environment. In
places, wom burrows are present. There is also pyrite present, which suggests an
hypoxic environment, if the pyritization is syngenetic. Geochemically the carbonate
rocks are argillaceous dolomitic limestones containing about 10-1 5% Mg0 and 15-
13
30% Si02 (Table 1). Petrographically, they are a neomorphic microbiospante
mudstone or wackestone.
Conodont Biost ratiara~hv
The carbonate beds of the Long Rapids outcrop were initially sampled for
conodonts; once the boundary interval was identified, more closely spaced samples
were taken of both carbonate and shale beds. All samples were processed using
10% formic acid and standard heavy liquid separation techniques. Black shales are
not usually processed with formic acid, but their high Ca0 content (Table 4) made
them amenable to disaggregation in this manner. All parts of conodont apparatuses
were recovered, but most non-plafform elements could not be identified to species
because of their vicarious nature (Klapper and Philip, 1971 ; Ziegler and Sandberg
1990). The biozonation of the Long Rapids Formation type section is based on Pa
elements, arguably the most rapidly evolving of the septirnembrate polygnathid and
palmatolepid apparatuses (Nicoll, 1987). In the Long Rapids Formation type section,
as elsewhere, Pa elements are better preserved, and more commonly recovered
than are other parts of the apparatus.
14
As well as abundant conodonts, there are other organisms present in the Long
Rapids Formation type section. Phosphatic brachiopods, tentaculitids (Homoctenus
spp.), and minor vertebrate rernains were also recovered. The goniatite bed
onginally reported by Savage and Van TuyJ (1 91 9), and later rediscovered by
Russell and Telford (1984), was found but could not be placed in the section
because of structural complications. Bezys and Risk (1 990) located the goniatite bed
at 10 m above the base in the tower part of the formation suggesting it occurs in the
mid-Late Palmatolepis rhenana Zone. This may correlate with unit 7 (Figure 4)
where a partial goniatite was found. Other goniatite finds (unit 4 in Figure 4) indicate
that there are rnay be more than one goniatite-bearing bed in the Long Rapids
Formation type section.
The lowest part of the section exposed at low water in the southem part of the
section at Long Rapids (location "C" in Figure 2) is the top of the Williams Island
Formation type section; the Long Rapids Formation type section is defined and
recognized by the first appearance of dark shale (Nonis et al., 1992). The top of the
Williams Island Formation type section strata contains the fauna of the upper Early
Palmatolepis rhenana Zone (Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990) or the beginning of the
15
Late Palmatolepis henana Zone, as the index fossil for the latter (Palmatolepis
rhenana rhenana) appears just below the base of the Long Rapids Formation type
section (Table 2). Palmatolepis foliacea is rare at the top of the Williams Island
Formation type section, suggesting that the basal Long Rapids Formation type
section contains a conodont fauna of the early part of the Late Palmatolepis henana
Zone as it is within the latter zone that the end of the range of Palmatolepis foliacea
occurs (Ziegler and Sanderg, 1990). The disappearance of Palmatolepis foliacea
(Table 2 ) is also an index for the lowerrnost part of Zone 13 of Klapper and Foster
(1993), which would place the Long Rapids Formation type section in that zone,
approximately equivalent to the Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone of Ziegler and
Sandberg (1 990).
The FrasniadFamennian boundarv in the Lonq Rapids Formation t v ~ e section
The FrasniadFamennian boundary area is found just above units 20 and 22, two
carbonate beds, each about 0.25 metre, that pinch and swell laterally (Figure 4).
Units 20 and 22 are separated by a 16 cm calcareous green mudstone interbed (unit
21) and are succeeded by a 9 cm calcareous green mudstone (unit 23) and a 4
16
metre thick succession of thinly laminated, calcareous, pyritic black shale that lacks
bioturbation (unit 24) (Figures 4, 5). The boundary occurs in the lower part of the
black shale section (Figure 5). 21.46 metres above the base of the section (contra
Telford [1985] in Norris et al. [1992:17]), and one to two cm above the base of the
black shale.
21.44 m above the base of the Long Rapids Formation type section Palmatolepis
linguiformis, the index fossil for the uppermost Frasn ian Palmatolepis linguiformis
Zone, first appears at the base of Unit 24. About 1 to 1.5 cm above that fossil's first
appearance, the index fossil for the Famennian, Palmatolepis triangularis, appears
and only one cm higher it occurs in significant quantities (Figure 6). The lowest part
of unit 24A was further divided into sample 20 (the lowest 1-1.5 cm) and sample 21
(the rernaining 9 cms) based on the first visible appearance on shale surfaces of the
Famennian index fossil, Palmatolepis triangularis ; however, Pa. subrecta is present
in the early part of sample 21, and is not completely absent until sample 22, just 10
cm above the base of sample 20. Others have also reported the survival of Frasnian
species into the lower part of the Famennian (Schülke, 1998). and the official
Figure 5: Photo of FrasniadFamennian boundary strata, in the Long Rapids Formation type section. Apparent pinching out towards right is
caused by different planes of view and photographic angle.
unit :
unit :
unit 2
[ --"..,.- .;,, Palmatolepis rhenana Zone
21.74
21.69
21.59
21 .!3
Fff bol
21 -44
Figure 6: Detailed sampling regime in the F/F boundary interval.
19
(Subcommittee on Devonian Stratigraphy or SDS) definition of the boundary is the
"abundant or flood occurrence of Palmatolepis triangulans, to the virtual exclusion of
other species of the genus, stratigraphically above the fauna dominated by the
characteristic upper Frasnian species" (Klapper et al., 1993). Ziegler and Sandberg
(1996) recognized the boundary by the "entry of Palmatolepis triangularis," a
definition that in the Long Rapids Formation type section would place it at the base
of sample 21 ; however, the SDS definition would place it about one cm above the
base of sample 2 1 , where Pa. subrecta (= Pa. winchelli) dies out. (Figures 5, 6, 7).
The Palmatole~is linuuiformis Zone
The Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone in the Long Rapids Formation type section
consists of only 2 cm (sample 20 [one cm] and the first cm or so of sample 21), while
the Late rhenana Zone encompasses over 20 meters. Chrono- and probably
lithostratigraphically, the Palmatolepis linguifomis Zone is much shorter than the
Palmatolepis rhenana Zone; Sandberg et al. (1 988) and Ziegler and Sandberg
2 1
(1 996) assigned a duration of .3 million years to the former and .7 to the latter, and
other authors (e.g., Joachimski and Buggisch, 1993) showed the Palmatolepis
linguifonnis Zone as only a small fraction of the thickness of the Palmatolepis
rhenana Zone. The influx of icriodid species in the Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone
may suggest shallower waters at this time (Seddon and Sweet, 1971 ) which could
also result in a period of extremely limited sedimentation or even sediment starvation
and erosion. There is evidence of erosion at the base of unit 24, at the lower contact
with the underlying green mud layer. Here a discontinuity lag layer and hardground
(Miall, 1984; Allaby and Allaby, 1990) are present, replete with conodont pearls
(phosphatic microspherules associated with conodonts), topmost Frasnian
linguifonnis Zone con odonts incl uding the index fossil Palmatolepis linguiformis,
homoctenids, and pyritized worm burrows (Figure 8). This layer (unit 24) has a
carbonate content (10.25%) over twice that of the underlying strata and a
manganese content of 1057 pprn, significantly higher than the 791 ppm average of
the boundary area beds (Table 6). Baird and Brett (1 986) interpreted similar pyritic
and fossil concentrations as due to subaqueous erosion under reduced oxygen
conditions associated with a marine transgression. How much of the linguifonnis
Zone is rnissing is not known; however, it is clear that the critical boundary section is
Figure 8: Lag layer from base of unit 24 (Sample 20), Long Rapids Formation type section, showing conodont (C)
and homoctenid (ribbed cone-like fossils) accumulations.
present in the lower part of unit 24A (samples 20 and 21). as there is a smooth
transit ion between Palma tolepis subrecta and Palmatolepis triangularis.
Sedimentation rate
Ricken (1 991 :786) suggested a method of assessing the length of the hiatus
represented by a lag deposit, a method that he ternis "enrichment of relic
constituents." This procedure involved counting the number of fossils concentrated
in the lag deposit. Assuming the fossils were winnowed from the unit below. he then
calculated how much sediment would have to have been eroded to account for the
deposit. In the Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone of the Long Rapids Formation type
section the total conodont numbers exceed 5441 specimens for sample 20 (onty 1
cm) and 1053 specimens for the underlying sample 19, consisting of 9 cm or roughly
100 for each cm. Since both samples processed are approximately the same weight
(20009 for sample 19 and 18989 for sample 20), sample 20 contains over 50 times
more fossils per cm than sample 19. This could suggest that approximately 50 cm of
strata were eroded away and winnowed to produce the overlying lag layer.
containing ,5441 conodonts. Based on a sedimentation rate of 0.01 mm /year (see
24
below), this might represent only 50.000 yean of missing time, which would mean
that the majority of the Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone is represented in 2 cm of
strata. This, in fact, is possible as extreme stratigraphic condensation is a
characteristic feature of FIF boundary sections (Morrow, 2000) and different
lithologies are being compared. Unit 23 is a green mudstone whereas unit 24 is
primarily fissile shale.
Miall (1997) has pointed out that sedimentation rates Vary by an astonishing eleven
orders of magnitude. depending upon the depositional environment and subsidence
rate. Subsidence rates Vary anywhere between 0.3 and 2.5 mm per year in
sedimentary basins (Allaby and Allaby, 1990). Various authors have tried to relate
these two factors to the FIF boundary strata in order to understand the duration of
the extinction event (Sandberg et al., 1988; Geldsetzer et al., 1993; Bratton et al.,
1999). A consaivative sedimentation rate estimate for the basinaVlower slope
depositional setting in an epeiric basin might be O. 1 mm per year (Ricken, 1991 :782),
leading to an estimated duration of about 214,000 yean for the Later Palmatolepis
menana Zone in the Long Rapids Formation type section. This compares with a
700,000 year estimate by Sandberg and Ziegler (1 996) for the Late Palmatolepis
menana Zone. Using this sedimentation rate the linguiformis zone strata of only 2
crns would represent only 200 years; however, there has been significant erosion of
this section, as indicated by the discontinuity at the top of unit 23 and the base of
unit 24 and there is a further erosion surface at the top of unit 20 which has been
planed virtually flat, in the Late Palmatolepis henana Zone. Even if the postulated
sedimentation rate were reduced to 0.01 mrn/year for the Palmatolepis linguiformis
Zone strata - the approximate rate that Sandberg et al. (1 988) used in their
calculations for the Gerrnan Steinbruch Schmidt section - the timespan involved
would be only 2,000 years. The duration for the F/F "extinction layer" at Steinbruch
Schmidt was calculated to be between 1 2,500 and 47,000 years, based on that
sedimentation rate. Wang et al. (1 996) calculated a sedimentation rate of 46 m/m.y.
(0.046 rnm/year) for sections in Alberta and compared this to calculated rates of 1.3
rn/m.y. (.O01 3 mmlyear) for some European sections (data from Jaochimski and
Buggisch, 1993) and 5.9 m/m.y. (0.0059 mm/year) for Chinese sections (from Wang
et al., 1 991 ). Applying the European rates to the linguifomis zone at the Long
Rapids Formation type section suggests that the 2 cm would have taken about 15
thousand years to deposit. It is. however quite likely that much more time is
26
represented than these calculations suggest, because of sediment starvation, non-
deposition and erosional hiatus.
Conodont Taxonomv
None of the conodonts recovered from the Long Rapids Formation type section are
either unexpected or controversial except possibly for Palmatolepis praetriangularis
Ziegler and Sandberg. This species was recognized and described by Sandberg et
al. (1 988) as the direct ancestor of all Famennian palmatolepid species. The only
difference between praetriangularis and tfiangularis is the dope of the posterior
platfonn of the Pa element; that cf ppraetriangulafis is flat or downward sloping, while
that of triangularis rises. Palmatolepis praetriangularis ranges from "within the
linguiformis Zone into the Middle triangularis Zone" (Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990).
Klapper et al. (1 993) challenged the validity of the taxon and synonymized
praetnangulark with its supposed progeny; Schülke (1 995; 1998) synonymized it
with Palmatolepis hassi. This study does not support either position, as
praetriangularis appean to be a distinct species from triangularis, ranging
th roug hout the Late Palmatolepis rhenana and Palmatolepis linguiformis Zones, into
27
the bottom of the overlying Palmatolepis triangularis Zone; it is also morphologically
distinct from Palmatolepis hassi. The species has not previously been reported from
the Late rhenana zone in any numbers (e.g. Morrow, 2000, table 12; in the latter
study, one bedding plane occurrence of Pa. praetriangularis was noted in the Late
Palma tolepis rhenana Zone).
Pa. praetriangularis Pa elements are variable in the Long Rapids Formation type
section, intermediate in morphology between Palmatolepis hassi, Pa. subrecta and
Pa. rotunda, which are al1 believed to have belonged to the same gene pool (Ziegler
and Sandberg, 1990:42) (Figure 9). Many of the variants recovered from the Long
Rapids Formation type section are similar or identical to Palmatolepis
praetriangularis as illustrated by Sandberg et al. (1 988, plate 1 , figures 1 -4). Over
half of the Palmatolepis praetriangularis Pa elements are juvenile and rnost mature
specimens are small (average 0.64 mm) when compared to the related Palmatolepis
hassi, Pa. subrecta and Pa. rotunda Pa elements recovered (average 1.051.801.70
mm, respectively; Figure 10). One possibility is that Palmatolepis praetriangularis is
simply an immature form of the Palmatolepis subrecta/Pa. rotundaPa. hassi trio;
Pa. triangularis
. praetriangularis
Time
Figure 9: lnferred evolutionary relationship of five morphologically similar Palmatolepid species(after Sandberg and Ziegler, 1 990:42).
N = 50 Y
Average size 1.05 48
Pa. hasa Pa element
N = 162
Average size 0.70
Pa. rotunoh Pa element
N=286
Average size 0.80
Pa. subrecta Pa element
Pa. praetriangularis Pa element
Figure 10: Cornparison of average element size in the four related Palmatolepid species recovered
30
however, the 51 3 mature specimens (Table 3) make this unlikely. A more plausible
hypothesis is that Palmatolepis praetriangulariç is a valid species that has evolved in
response to the Late Devonian environmental fluctuations. This interval of time was
a period of great environmental stress, stress that started much earlier than the
Frasnian-Famennian event (Schindler, 1993; Racki, 1 998a). Faunal extinctions
began in the Late rhenana Zone and are recorded in the Lower Kellwasser
Limestone in Germany and France. The reefal ecosystems throughout Europe were
decimated (McGhee, 1996). although the extinctions recorded in the Upper
Kellwasser Limestone were much more severe. Evidence for earlier extinction
events has not been located in the Long Rapids Formation type section; however.
the black shale lithology and general paucity of megafossils demonstrate that the
habitat was likely hypoxic and under stress.
The Moose River Basin's only connection to the main epicontinental ocean that
covered most of the eastern United States and southem Ontario in the Devonian
was via a narrow seaway (Sanford, 1987; Johnson et al., 1992); during the
Phanerozoic this connection was periodically severed because of epeirogenic uplift
of the Frontenac and Fraserdale arches. and marine regressions. An end-Frasnian
3 1
marine regression recorded in the Long Rapids Formation type section (see below)
may well have geographically isolated the Moose River Basin. providing a fertile
'breeding ground' for the development of allopatric species (Mayr, 1988). In stressful
environments, species adopt 'proportioned dwarfism' as a strategy to adapt to a
radically changing environment (Gould, 1977). This would explain the smaller size of
Palmatolepis praetriangularis; examples of this adaptation during the
FrasnianIFamennian were previously documented by Schülke (1 998) for
palmatolepid species and Renaud and Girard (1 999) for palmatolepid and icriodid
species. Smaller body size, together with progenesis. early sexual maturity. and
high fecundity are a natural survival response to times of environmental stress.
Speedy maturation and the production of abundant offspring, with lots of genetic
variation and mutation potential, are typical of r-selection (Abercrombie et al., 1992),
which favours organisms that increase more rapidly (r=intrinsic rate of increase), can
colonire quickly and can make use of short-lived resources. A mutant Palmatolepis
sp. Pa element found in the Long Rapids Formation type section (PI. 2 fig. 18) would
support this hypothesis, although Sandberg et al. (1 997) preferred to attribute the
various mutations obsewed around the F/F boundary to cosmic radiation.
32
It should be noted that the data of Renaud and Girard (1999) disagree somewhat
with that of this study. These authors reported that Palmatolepis praetriangularis has
"approximately the sarne size" as Palmatolepis rotunda and Palmatolepis subrecta
and that al1 three species decrease in size at, or just above the Upper Kellwasser
Limestone in the FIF type section at the Coumiac quariy in southem France. This
study shows no significant change in platfom size through time for any of these
species (Table 3), but does show consistent size difference between
praetriangularis and its progenitor group thoughout the Long Rapids Formation type
section. The difference in the number of elements avaitable for measurement is
perhaps significant, with the Long Rapids Formation type section database almost
eight times larger than that of Renaud and Girard for Palmatolepis praetriangularis
(51 1 :65), over three times larger for Palmatolepis hassi (50:16) and Palmatolepis
rotunda (1 6252) and twice as large for Palmatolepis subrecta (286: 143). Also,
whereas this study used the length of Pa elements as a size index, Renaud and
Girard did a Fourier transform of the entire Pa platfom, calculating a circle diameter
with the sarne area as the platform, and used that as a measure of size. Although
this is more accurate, with palmatolepids the length of the Pa element is proportional
to surface area, and is an adequate proxy for overall size.
Conodont 'Pearls'
Calcium phosphate spheres occur intemittently throughout the Long Rapids
Formation type section but are particularly abundant around the
FrasniadFamennian boundary beds. More than 2000 specimens were recovered
from samples 20 and 21 in the boundary shale. almost two orders of magnitude
more than the numbers found elsewhere (a maximum of 40 found in sample 18) in
the Long Rapids Formation type section. Above sample 21 (unit 24A) they drop off
sharply to single digit counts and then disappear in the Famennian (Table 2.
samples 23-28)
The largest number of 'pearls' was found in sarnple 20 which contains the lag
concentrate from the Palmatolepis linguifomis Zone. The FIF boundary is found in
sample 21 and although it contained 254 'pearls', it is almost an order of magnitude
lower than the subjacent unit, but almost an order of magnitude higher than any
other unit in the Long Rapids Formation type section. Nor does the incidence of
pearls appear to be related to lithology, as they are present in both shale and
carbonate beds (e.g., sample 18). and absent in both as well (e.g., samples 26-28).
34
That there is a concentration of these fossils at the latest Frasnian and at the actual
boundary is undeniable, but their significance is unknown, as we do not understand
what part of the organism they represent, or even if they are part of the conodont
animal. They have never been repoited in the literature without conodonts also
being present.
Glenister et al. (1 976) hypothesized that the 'pearls' were secretions by the
conodont animal in response to an organic or particulate irritant. They thought that
this might be a parasite, as they are the most common stimulus for similar
fomiations in bivalves. The 'pearls' when tested, showed the same calcium,
phosphatic composition as conodonts. Although most of the 'pearls' occurred in
black shale, there appears to be no lithological correlation as other black shale
samples (e.g., samples 22, 24) yielded very few of the 'pearls'. The proximity of the
large number of pearls to the F/F boundary might lead one to hypothesize a bloom
of infesting organisms as a kill mechanism. perhaps caused by a eutrophic
environment (Algeo et ab, 1995; Racki, 1998a). but aside from the 'pearl' spike,
there is no other data to support this theory (PI. 3, figs. 15-1 9).
Biofacies
Continuing the work of Seddon and Sweet (1971), Sandberg (1976) recognized
Devonian conodont biofacies in five biofacies belts; subsequently, Sandberg and
Dreesen (1 984) broadened it furtber to include nine biofacies. Their biofacies model
is useful for understanding water depths and distinguishing between pelagic and
nearshore environrnents. The palmatolepid-polygnathid biofacies is the second most
offshore biofacies that Sandberg and Dreesen (1 984) interpreted to represent a
middle to upper slope environment. The two genera must constitute at least 70 per
cent of the fauna to qualify as a biofacies under this interpretation (Sandberg et al.,
1988). The only biofacies present in the Long Rapids Formation type section is the
palrnatolepid/polygnathid biofacies, although numbers of icriodids are present in the
Williams Island Formation type section (samples 1-7 in Table 2) and in the boundary
shale (al1 the samples from unit 24, Le., samples 20-26 in Table 2).
Figure 1 1 shows the changing percentages of ancyrodellid/ancyrognathid.
palmatolepid, polygnathid and icriodid species throughout the Long Rapids
Formation type section, based on Pa elements. Note the icriodids in the upper
Sample 28 Sample 27 Sample 26 Sample 25 Sample 24 Sample 23 Sample 22 Sam le 1
~aund)ar~f?k Sample 20 Sample 19 Sample 18 Sample 17
Sample 16 Sample 15 Sampie 14
Sample 13 Sample 12 Sample 11 Sample 10 Sample 09 Sample 08 Sample 07 Sample 06 Sample 05
Sample 04 Sample 03 Sample 02 Sample 01
m icriodid Pa elements
Palmatolepid Pa elements
Figure 1 1 : Percentage of conodont Pa elements by Genus
Fff boundary occurs at me base of Sample 21 a AncyrodeNidl
Ancyrognat hid Sarnple 26 contained only 7 Pa eiements Pa elements
a7] Poiygmthid Pa elements
37
Williams Island Formation type section and increase in icriodid numbers just below
and above the FIF boundary. In al1 samples but one (sample 26 which had only 7 Pa
elements recovered) palmatolepid and polygnathid Pa elements combined represent
over 80 per cent of the platform genera. The icriodid increase at the FIF is indicative
of changing environments in the upper Frasnian and lower part of the Famennian.
Global Correlations
The changing icriodid percentages and the discontinuity surfaces at the top of unit
20 (Late Palmatolepis rhenana Zone) and the base of unit 24 (Palmatolepis
linguifomis Zone) suggest a short, sharp regressive pulse or shallowing upward
trend just before the boundary. This trend has been identified elsewhere (Sandberg
et al., 1988) and has been interpreted to be synchronous with a global anoxic event
causing the F/F extinction (Goodfellow et al., 1988; Morrow, 2000). The Upper
Kellwasser Limestone, widely distributed in Germany, Belgium and France, is
associated with this extinction horizon (Schindler, 1990b, 1993). The Upper
Kellwasser rocks consist of dark mudstones and wackestones intercalated with dark
marly shales (Schindler and Konigshof, 1997; Schindler et al., 1998) and the top of
38
the Upper Kellwasser Limestone has been identified as the FrasnianIFamennian
boundary by many researchers (Sandberg et al., 1988: Joachimski and Buggisch,
1993). Lithologically, the uppermost Long Rapids Formation type section carbonate
beds (units 20 and 22 in Figures 4 and 5) containing Frasnian conodonts are similar
to some of the European and North American sections of the Upper Kellwasser
Limestone. Three sections, Steinbruch Schmidt in Gemany and Hony and Sinsin in
Belgium show many similarities with the Long Rapids Formation type section, in
termç of altemating carbonate and marly shale lithologies (Figure 12) and increasing
icriodid presence, indicating sea-level and environmental changes. A microtektite
layer was also reported at the Hony section (Claeys et al.. 1996); there is, however,
no conodont control at Hony and the layer cannot be definitely placed at the
boundary. No similar microtektite layers were found elsewhere in European locales
nor in the Long Rapids Formation type section, despite their geographic proximity to
each other during Late Devonian times (Figure 13). The global stratotype for the FIF
boundary at Coumiac, France shows a possible hiatuddiscontinuity surface similar
to that in the Long Rapids Formation type section, a surface that has been
interpreted (Ziegler and Sandberg, 1996; Schindler and Konigshof, 1997) to indicate
the erosion of part of the Earîy Palmatolepis triangularis Zone, probably
microtekt layer
Unit 24 -
Unit 23 -
F/F Boundary œ œ
Long Rapids Fm.
Hony
Steinbruch Schmidt
i"" '" I
Carbonate
Figure 12: Lithostratigraphic comparison of Long Rapids Fm. type section and Hony (Belgium), Sinsin (Belgium). and Steinbruch Schmidt (Germany) F/F boundary
sections. Hony. Sinsin and Steinbruch Schmidt columns modified from Sandberg et al., (1988)
Hony Sinsin
\
Figure 13: Map of the Late Devonian (Famennian) palaeogeography and location of selected F/F sections. (after Scotese and McKerrow, 1990). Used with permission.
41
as a result of submarine scour or subaerial exposure caused by regressive seas
(however, see Girard et al. Il9971 for a differing opinion). Hypotheses on immediate
and ultimate causes for the FIF extinction will be discussed in more detail below.
Upperrnost Frasnian carbonate beds from the Sessacker trench near Oberscheld,
Gemany are similar to those of the Long Rapids Formation type section. Both
sections show a chaotic wackestone texture with dark organic staining and fossil
fragments, capped by a layer of thinly laminated mudstone (Schindler at al., 1998).
(Figure 14).
The Sessacker trench section is the only section in Europe where the FIF boundary
does not coincide with the top of Upper Kellwasser Limestone. This is similar to the
situation in the Long Rapids Formation type section. where the boundary occurs
within the first few cm of the black shale unit 24, about 10-12 cm above the top of
the upper Kellwasser-like carbonate unit 22 (Figs. 4, 5 and 6). It should be noted,
however, that many boundary sections (e.g. Figure 12) contain shale and mud
layers within and above the uppermost Frasnian carbonate beds, beds that
Upper Kellwasser strata from Ihe Sessacker trench qheinisches Schiefergebirge, Germany) Schindler et al., 1998, PI. 3, fig. 8).
Long Rapids Formation type section, Unit 20.
Figure 14: Cornparison of Long Rapids Formation type section and Sessacker trench carbonate strata just below the FIF boundary, showing similarities in organic staining & thinly laminated micritic caps
43
apparently have not been sampled for conodonts (Steinbruch Schmidt in Gennany,
Hony and Sinsin in Belgium, Devil's Gate in Nevada; see Sandberg et ai., 1988).
Since, as this study shows, shale/mud lithologies often produce significant conodont
yields, it is puuling why these units were not tested. Although Sandberg et al.
(1 988) called the 5 cm dark carbonaceous shale between the top of the Frasnian
Iimestone and the overlying Famennian strata in Steinbruch Schmidt the "extinction
layef, no biofogical or geochemical evidence was provided. Over (1 997) sarnpled
some shales in his analysis of the F/F boundary in western New York; however, he
collected mainly from shale surfaces, so yields were limited and possibly unreliable.
Geochemistry
Extensive geochemical testing was done on a cm to decimeter basis in the boundary
strata, from the mud unit (sample 19) below unit 24 (samples 20-26) into the
Famennian. Seven parameten were investigated in detail: whole rock and trace
element composition, iridium content and isotpe ratios for carbon, oxygen, nitrogen
and sulphur.
Trace elements
A general preliminary analysis was done of the carbonate beds in the whole section
to gel an overview of the whole rock and trace element composition of the Long
Rapids Formation type section (Table 1). Later, more detailed whole rock and trace
element samples were taken of the F/F boundary area on a much more detailed
scale (Tables 4-6), testing for any geochemical anomalies in the boundary beds
which might enhance our understanding of what caused the biological extinctions.
lnductively coupled plasma emission spectometry was carried out by Activation
Laboratories of Ancaster, Ontario. Most of the results were as expected: the major
carbonate lithology is a dolomitic limestone with a high clay content. Elevated levels
of V, Zr and Ba were found in the carbonates below the F/F boundary but this is not
surprising since these elements concentrate preferentially in shales over carbonates
(Turekian and Wedepohl, 1961) and the Long Rapids Formation type section
carbonates are quite argillaceous (between 15% and 37% Si02 content, see Table
1). Some of these elements, however, are thought to be indicative of anoxia.
lncreased levels of vanadium, for example, have been interpreted as an indicator of
anoxic sediments at three FIF boundary sections in Utah (Bratton et ai., 1999)
45
where, as in the Long Rapids Formation type section, the increase precedes the
boundary interval. Boundary strata shale beds also show uranium content that is two
to three times richer than a "normal" shale (Turekian and Wedepohl, 196 1) and
thought to be an indicator of anoxic sediments (Calvert, 1976). The chalcophile
elements sulphur, antimony and arsenic, which in their sulphide forrn are indicative
of a reducing environment (Krauskopf, 1979), increase sharply at the lag layer (base
of unit 24, sample 20, where pyrite is observable) and remain high throughout
(Tables 5, 6). As will be discussed in some detail below, anoxic conditions are also
demonstrated by carbon isotope ratios. Other anomalies present include increased
levels of Ba which have been interpreted as an indicator of hydrothermal activity
caused by increased island arc vulcanism and subduction at the end of the Frasnian
(Racki, 1998a); however, the increased levels of Ba in the Long Rapids Formation
type section are present only in the carbonate strata and may be due to their high
clay content, as outlined above. lncreased Ni, about Nice the shale average, is also
present (Table 6) , but the significance, if any, is unknown.
Iridium
Using Neutron Activation Analysis (NAA), Iridium (Ir) was also tested for, as an
indicator of a bolide impact (Alvarez et al., 1980). NAA bombards the sample with
neutrons in a nuclear reactor to form new radionuclides that decay and produce
gamma particles with characteristic energies indicative of their source elements,
measurable with a scintillation counter.
No significant Ir anomaly was found at the boundary; these findings are consistent
with other F/F sections world wide (Goodfellow et al., 1988; Claeys et al., 1996; Over
et al., 1997; Hallam & Wignalt, 1997). The only Ir anomaly ever reported for the
FrasnianIFamennian boundary is in Australia where the anomaly is probably of
biogenic origin, and in any case, was later found not to correspond with the
boundary (McGhee, 1996; Girard et al., 1997) (Table 7). For cornparison purposes
the Danish Mesozoic section at Stevns Klint sampled by Alvarez et al. (1 980)
showed an iridium anomaly of 41.6 ppb for the CretaceoudTertiary boundary;
another Cretaceouflertiary boundary section in the Red Deer Valley, Alberta
contains iridium concentration of 3.36 ppb (Lerbekmo and St. Louis. 1985). Most
47
results from the Long Rapids Formation type section are well under 1 ppb, aithough
a green mud layer (sample 15) -90 cm below the boundary measured 4 ppb. This is
a significant amount. 3-12 times background, and 4 times crustal average of 1 ppb
(Klein and Hurlbut, 1977); however in the absence of additional data indicative of an
impact event, e.g., microtektites, one cannot demonstrate an extraterrestrial origin
for the iridium. Ir anomalies may also be the result of volcanic/hydrotherma1. low
temperature depositional processes (that are enhanced by anoxic conditions and
accumulations of organic matter), biological and post depositional causes
(Sawlowics, 1993; Sharpton and Ward, 1990).
Carbon occurs in three isotopes, 12C (98.89% of natural carbon), '3C (1.1 1%) and 14C
(decays with a 5570 year half-life and because of decay is not present in Palaeozoic
rocks). Photoautotrophic organisms prefer the lighter isotope in photosynthesis as it
is easier to assimilate. Thus an enrichment in 13C might indicate the increased
activity of phytoplankton actively removing the lighter isotope. 13C enrichment can
also be interpreted to indicate mass mortality where large amounts of organic matter
48
are deposited in an anoxic sedirnentary environment and the organically fixed
carbon is not released back into the environment, because there is no oxidization
(McGhee, 1996). If the 6% is negative and the amount of 13C decreases, one might
Say that it is the result of a temporary reduction of surface water productivity and
biomass associated with an extinction (Wang et al., 1996). There are also two tests
for 13C, one for the organic component of the rock and one for the inorganic
carbonate component of the rock. Most researchers choose one or the other (but
see Joachirnski, 1997 for a comparison of the two). In some sections there is a
positive excursion (e.g., Steinbruch Schmidt, Gennany; Coumiac, France;
Laojiangchong, south China; Medicine Lake, Alberta) aild in some areas there is a
negative change (Cinquefoil Mountain, Alberta; Luoxiu, south China) (Wang et al.,
1991 ; Joachimski and Buggisch, 1993; 1996; Zheng et al., 1993; Hou et al., 1996).
Each researcher has interpreted the increase or decrease in I3C according to hisher
own preferences.
Both organic and inorganic '2C/13C ratios were measured at the University of
Waterloor's Environmental Isotope Laboratory using mass spectometry. a process
that separates the different isotopes by vaporization, accelerating them through a
strong magnetic field, and then measuring their different electrical potentials by
elect rometry.
The results are shown in Figure 15. In the lag layer underlying the FIF boundary
there is a significant increase of organic and carbonate 13C of between 2 per mille
(organic) and 5 per mille (carbonate) that is maintained (organic) or increases
(carbonate) through the boundary and drops afteiwards, in most of the remaining
samples. This compares with similar increases in three German sections reported by
Joachimski and Buggisch (1 993): Steinbruch Schmidt in the Rheinische
Schiefergebrige, +3.0 per mille; Steinbruch Benner in the Rheinische
Schiefergebrige.. +3.3 per mille and Vogelsberg in Thuringia, +3.9 per mille.
The total organic carbon (TOC), increases sharply at the basal lag layer (sample
20), and reaches a peak of over 10 per cent in the FIF boundary area (sample 20-
6). Compare this to results of Bezys and Risk (1990) for the Long Rapids Formation
type section that show TOC ranging between 0.75 per cent and 6.27 per cent, with a
mean value for the black shales of 4.6 per cent. The correlative Kettle Point
Formation of southem Ontario ranges between approx. 2-15 per cent TOC over the
G r o w n Mudslone Ootoetono
Figure 15: Percentage composition carbon and carbon isotope ratios in the FIF boundary strata, Long Rapids Fm. type section.
5 1
entire range of the formation with an average around 7 per cent (Armstrong et al.,
1988; Russell, 1985). Clearly the TOC and carbon isotope spikes indicates a
sudden removal and burial of a great deal of organic matter into an anoxic basin,
that preserved the organic matter and the 12C within it, thus elevating I3C
propoitions. Whether the positive 13C excursion is due to a phytoplankton bloorn or a
mass dying, or both, is unknown. A causal Iink between the former and latter
phenornena has been explained (Murphy et al., 2000) by eutrophication leading to
high surface-water productivity, loss of water clarity and the development of benthic
anoxia, as respiratory demands exceed 4 supply.
Nit roaen
Along with '2C/13C ratios 14NPN ratios were also measured as part of the
Environmental Isotope Laboratory's analytical package. This is the f irst time nitrogen
isotope ratios have been tested for at the F/F boundary, although they have been
studied at the Cretaceousflertiary boundary (e.g. Gilmour et al., 1990) and in other
parts of the Phanerozoic.
52
Since plankton also contains nitrogen in the fom of proteins and as in carbon the
lighter isotope is preferentially utilized by the organism, one would have expected to
witness a positive alSN change at the F/F boundary. This is in fact what is reported at
the K/T boundary in Woodside Creek, New Zealand (Gilmour et al., 1990). However,
results at the Long Rapids Formation type section show a positive 14N/15N ratio only
until the start of the hardgroundAag layer surface (base of unit 24, sample 20), where
the ratio suddenly becomes negative (Figure 16). This puzzle may be explained by
the hypothesis of Wang et al. (1 996) that surface water productivity and biomass
decline during an extinction event. If 14N is not being taken up by organisms, 15N
quantities decrease proportionately, thus driving the ratio negative. This scenario
would assume of course that 14N is not locked up in an anoxic sedimentary basin,
that is in fact the case as denitrification takes place in stratified anaerobic water
bodies (Hoefs, 1997:43), whereas decarbonization does not.
O x y m
Figure 16 also displays the results of oxygen isotope testing: a major positive
excursion in d''O of over 3.0 per mille occurred at the boundary, followed by a large
negative move in the other direction, starting at sample 23 of over 10 per mille. The
Black shcrle Green Mudslone DoIoetone
Figure 16: Oxygen and nitrogen isotope ratios in the F/F boundary strata, Long Rapids Fm. type section.
54
ratio of the stable oxygen isotopes, 1 8 0 and 160 is used as a method for estimating
past ocean temperatures, as the proportion of 1 8 0 increases as temperature falls.
When water freezes the lighter 160 is preferentially frozen out in the ice, leaving
behind increased amounts of the heavier isotope in manne waters (McGhee, 1996).
Because of very small amounts of Ca0 in al1 the shale and mud samples at the Long
Rapids Formation type section, results must be treated with some caution, although
they are not inconsistent with reports from other F/F sections. j 8 0 values from strata
at Steinbruch Schmidt shows a positive a180 shift at the boundary although there is
only a small negative shift afterwards (McGhee, 1996); F/F strata of the Canning
Basin in Western Australia show a similar positive shift, followed by a steady
negative decline, perhaps indicating a sudden temperature drop followed by a
waming trend (Goodfellow et al., 1988); at Coumiac the dT8C values are high until 10
cm above the boundary and remain low until60 cm above, where they return to
normal (Goodfellow et al., 1988) - researchen believe this indicates a warming
trend after the mass extinction - although there is no indication of a temperature
drop at the boundary. In Luoxiu, south China researchers report a sudden +at80 shift
that suggests a short lived decrease in temperature (Yan-Zheng et ab, 1993). The
overall isotopic data, including the results from the Long Rapids Formation type
55
section, supporl the hypothesis that there was a sharp drop in temperature at the
boundary, followed by a longer warrning trend thereafter. The temperature drop was
probably caused by the enhanced burial of organic carbon that had a significant
effect on CO, and 4 concentrations in the atmosphere; lower CO2 causes global
cooling and may even lead to a worldwide regression if there is a buildup of the polar
ice caps (Joachimski and Buggisch, 1993).
Suiphur
Sulphur 8% data can be used to provide evidence for reducing water conditions at
the F/F boundary (Wang et al., 1996). Sulphate reducing bacteria, that thrive in
anoxic waters, prefer lighter isotopes, producing lighter isotope sulphides and
leaving residual heavy isotope sulphates. High sulphide production andor high
pyrite buriat (also a light sulphide) enrich sea water in the heavier isotope. "S. so
that sedimentary sulphide that was formed later through bacterial reduction would
exhibit higher 2% values (Wang et al., 1996; McGhee, 1996).
Sulphur 3% values at the Long Rapids Formation type section are ambiguous.
There is a very significant (almost 10 per mille) negative spike in the green mud level
just below the boundary that peaks at the basal lag layer, where the percentage of
sulphur also jumps to over 5 per cent. There is then a small, approximately 2 per
mille positive spike at the boundary and the figures stay in this range for the
remaining samples, except for two positive excursions at the green mud layers
(samples 22 and 24) that may be lithologically dependent (i.e., increased
oxygenation resulting in increased sulphates) (Figure 17).
In two sections in Alberta measured for % P2S ratios, a positive spike was observed
at the F/F boundary (Wang et al., 1996). There was atso a large negative spike that
occurs just below the boundary (which also occurs at the Long Rapids Formation
type section) and probably represents the initial sulphide production at the onset of
anoxia, where sulphides would be enriched in the lighter isotope until the lighter
isotope was depleted and the heavier isotope preferentially utilized. The large
amount of sulphur present at the F/F boundary is probably the result of volcano-
hydrothermal activity, which may or may not have been caused by a bolide impact
(Racki, 1 998a).
Black s h a l w Green M u d s t o n w Dolostone
Duration of the F/F Event
The timing of the carbon, oxygen, nitrogen and sulphur isotopic ratio changes show
a pattern which sheds some light on the duration of the FrasniadFamennian
extinction event. Changes begin in the mudstone horizon below the boundary
(sample 19) which corresponds to the topmost part of the Late Palmatolepis rhenana
Zone and continue through the discontinuity surface (sample 20-1) and other
Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone samples (20-2 through 20-6). Maximum 6 values
occur either in samples 20-2 (+6 13c organic), sample 20-4 (+6 ' 3~ carbonate,
+ 6 %, and - 6 %) or in sample 21 -1 (-6 '=N), the base or first cm of which (see
page 13) corresponds with the FrasniadFramennian boundary and beginning of the
Early Palmatolepis triangularis Zone. After the maximum is reached 6 values remain
relatively high, ignoring positive spikes in the suphur and nitrogen isotope ratios in
samples 22 and 24 which may correlate with the change of lithology from shale to
mudstone. Negative 6 "0 values peak in sample 23 which, as stated above, is
consistent with a warming trend after the F/F boundary. Although the extent of the
discontinuity between sample 19 and 20 is unknown, there appears to be a relatively
continuous change in isotopic ratios between the Late Palmatolepis rhenana Zone,
the Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone and Early Palmatolepis triangularis Zone,
suggesting that the F/F extinction took place gradually over the course of some tens
of thousands of years or more (see page 23). The greatest change seerns to have
taken place in the latter part of the Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone.
Discussion
Geology is al1 about time and "we derive time frorn boundaries" (McLaren, 1970).
Since McLaren's presidential address we have leamed a lot about the
FrasniadFamennian extinction that took place 364 million years ago (Sandberg and
Ziegler, 1996). There is now general agreement that the immediate cause of the
extinction was oceanic oxygen depletion, exacerbated by oceanic overtum, flooding
shallow epicontinental seas and killing benthic organisms (Goodfellow et al., 1988;
Sandberg et al., 1988; Schindler, 1990; Geldsetzer et al., 1993; Racki, 1998a;
Schulke, 1998; inter alia). The results from the Long Rapids Formation type section
are consistent with this hypothesis. There is also strong sedimentological and biotic
evidence for a sharp marine regression at. or just before, the boundary (Sandberg et
al., 1 988; Geldsetzer et al., 1 993; Muchez et al., 1 996; this study). lncreased
60
icnodids and the presence of disconformity surfaces (Trout River, N.W.T; possibly
Coumiac, France; the top of unit 20 (sample 16) and the base of unit 24 (sample 20)
at the Long Rapids Formation type section) suggest that a regression exposed the
carbonate strata to subaerial or subaqueous erosion and was immediately followed
by a marine transgression just before the F/F boundary. At the Long Rapids
Formation type section the transgression is recorded in the erosion surface at the
base of unit 24, which may represent a ravinement or maximum flooding surface:
this is then followed by an extensive -25 metre black shale sequence, -1 Sm of
which is exposed in the type section on the Abitibi River and an additional -1 0m
logged in the Onakawana 6 core (Bezys and Risk, 1990). Increasing palmatolepid
vs. polygnathid generic percentages after the boundary (Figure 11) are another
indicator of deepending waters (Sandberg, 1976). While the entire Long Rapids
Formation was deposited in relatively deep waters. consistent with a mainly pelagic
palmatolepid/potygnathid biofacies, below the F/F boundary the strata of mainly
mudstone altemating with dolomitic carbonate appear to represent shallower water
conditions (Brett and Baird, 1985) than the shale beds at and above the boundary,
which may represent the beginning of a late Frasnian, early Famennian
transgression after the shallowing just before the F E
6 1
While the F/F boundary extinctions are traditionally associated with a regression
which penisted into the early Famennian (Sandberg et al., 1988; Joachirnski and
Buggisch, 1993; Muchez et al, 1996; Morrow, 2000) data from this study suggests
that the regression took place just before the boundary and the boundary itself
marks the beginning of a transgressive episode, recorded in the anoxic black shales.
The continued presence of icriodids in the beginning of the black shale sequence at
the Long Rapids Formation type section (samples 21 -26) suggests that the
transgression began initially in a shallower water setting. The link between
transgressions, the spread of anoxic bottorn waters and marine extinctions has been
particulariy well documented throughout the Phanerozoic by Hallam and Wignall
(1 999) who questioned whether the WF extinction was caused by a regression. as
has been traditionally assurned since the time of Newell (1 967). Over (1 997) also
located the F/F boundary in New York within a black shale transgressive sequence;
had the black shale strata in sorne the classic European sections been examined for
conodonts (page 29, above), the F/F boundary location might have shifted from the
limestone to the shale. potentially altering sequence stratigraphie interpretations.
The ultimate cause of the anoxia is controversial. One group of geologists
(Sandberg et ab, 1988; Geldsetzer et al., 1996) have maintained that a bolide impact
at the F/F boundary initiated "drastic sedimentary events, including major storms,
dumping, debris flows and the formation of tsunami deposits" (Geldsetzer et al.,
1996: 190). Sandberg et al. (1 988) hypothesized that the event was caused by a
"variety of interrelated factors" including "rapid rise and fall of sea-level, causing
corresponding changes in the oxygen-minimum level, stratification and de-
stratification of the water column and reversal of current directions producing
oceanic turnover", al1 associated with the "theorized" (Sandberg et al., 1988:296)
impact of a large bolide. Tsunamis are also interpreted to have resulted from the
collapse of carbonate platforms at the lowest point of the regression, represented in
the stratigraphical record by a debris flow limestone congolomerate in Devils Gate,
Nevada (Sandberg et ai., 1988:288).
The bolide impact theory is appealing as it provides a simple 'instant' answer to a
veiy complex problern; however, an iridium anomaly expected with a bolide impact is
not present in the Long Rapids Formation type section. The only F/F section with an
Ir anomaly occurs in south China (Wang et al., 1991) and is very slight (.23 ppb),
63
over two orders of magnitude less than the Stevns Klint, Denmark, Ir high. The Long
Rapids Formation type section shows a significant anomaly of 4 ppb in unit 19
(sample 1 S), well below the boundary that, as was discussed, may or rnay not be
attributable to an impact. The stratotype section at Coumiac was investigated for Ir
anomalies by Girard et al. (1 997), as was the Hony section in Belgium (Ciaeys et al..
1996); both iacked iridium anomalies; however, at Hony a microtektite layer was
found at, or close to an uncertain F/F boundary. Nickel-silicate spherules have also
been reported close to the FIF boundary from south China (Wang and Bai, 1988; Bai
et al., 1994), suggesting that cometary impacts may have been involved in the
overall FIF perturbations.
The sedimentological evidence presented by Sandberg et al. (1 988) of storm
deposits in Steinbruch Schmidt, Hony and Sinsin and tsunami breccia at Devils
Gate, just above the boundary, are equivocal. Others have suggested that the
phenomeoon is due to in-situ brecciation caused by earthquakes, i.e. a seismite
(Schindler. 1990b; Pans et al., 1996; Schindler et al., 1998). Brecciation was not
observed in the Long Rapids Formation type section and sedimentation was
apparently continous and srnooth across the F/F boundary. There is, however,
64
ample evidence of tectonic activity (extensive faulting and folding) within the section;
this cannot unfortunately be tied to boundary events as sorne researchers have
done (Racki, 1998a). Ultramafic intrusives have been found at Sextant and Coral
Rapids on the Abitibi River south of the Long Rapids Formation type section, but
their relationship to the surrounding sedimentary rocks only indicates that the
perturbations were post-Eifelian (Sanford and Norris, 197581 ).
In two recent studies, Racki (1998a, b) suggested that while bolide events near but
not at the F/F boundary likely participated in the F/F destabilization, the ultimate
cause was a tangled combination of nutrient poisoning and mostly related anoxia,
rapid tectonic subsidence, and profound sea-level and climatic variations" resulting
from a major rifting event related to superplume activity. A similar conclusion was
reached earlier by Schindler (1 WOa, b) who concluded that multicausal, largely
earth-born processes were responsible for the extinction. Schindler hypothesized
that tectonic rnovements. like narrowing of the Palaeotethys Ocean, caused eustatic
changes and altered prevailing currents. This together with the onset of southem
hemisphere glaciation, lowered temperatures, changed the water chemistry and
stratified the water column, eventually leading to oceanic inversion where anoxic
65
bottorn waters suddenly invade the photic zone. In al1 these scenarios, the precise
triggering mechanism for the oceanic overtum, whether bolide impact, increased
rifting and plate subsidence, or hydrothennal or volcanic activity, is unclear. Another
possibility is that there was no oceanic overturn at ait, simply an upward movement
of the pycnocline as proposed by Russell (1 993) for the Kettle Point Formation of
southwestern Ontario. Hallam and Wignall (1999) link the anoxia to high amplitude
regressive-transgressive couplets. Another group of geologists (Algeo et al., 1995;
Algeo and Scheckfer, 1998) posit a direct connection between arborescence (tree
stature) and the rise of the seed bearing land plants, development of soils,
increased nutrient discharge, and eutrophication causing phytoplanktonic blooms,
muddying surface waters and creating anoxia due to the respiration of sinking
organic material. While the results are generally clear, the causes are less so, even
though they are al1 probably closely interrelated, interdependent and cornplex.
Summarv
It has often been obsewed that the geological "record" is more gap than record
(Ager. 1 993; Miall, 1 997). Even though precise biostratigraphic and geochemical
control allows us to identify the Frasnian-Famennian boundary in the Long Rapids
Formation type section (northem Ontario. Canada), there are gaps present. Parts of
the Late Palmatolepis rhenana Zone and the Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone are
missing. but fottunately, the critical F/F interval is present in a continuous black
shale sequence. Although there is an indium anomaly -90 cm below the boundary,
there is no evidence there, or at the F/F boundary for a sudden extraterrestrial
impact. The change across the boundary, frorn the basal discontinuity surface of unit
24 (sample 20) to the beginning of the Lower triangolaris Zone is smooth and
continuous. Although there was mass mortality at this horizon there is no single
bedding plane where the Frasnian conodonts die out and the Famennian appear -
the dying was gradua1 and continual, although over a relatively tiny 'instant' of
geological time - thousands to tens of thousands of years in duration.
Since the original discovery of iridium anomalies by Alvarez et al. (1 980),
catastrophe theory has had a major renaissance. In the public's mind, dinosaurs
67
were killed by asteroid impact that precipitated a 'nuclear winter'. Although there is
little, if any, evidence for this in the fossil record - see, for example, the Geological
Association of Canada's 1999 Symposium on Global Mass Extinctions and Impacts,
where not a single paper presented gave evidence of a sudden impact causing any
of the Phanerozoic extinction events - some geologists still contend that the
immediate and ultimate cause of the extinction at the end of the Cretaceous was
"virtually proven" (Gould. 1994) to be an asteroid impact. Clearly there are bedding
planes that contains significant iridium anomalies and there was an asteroid impact,
but the fossil record shows that dinosaurs and a host of other organisms began to
die out out millions of years before the impact event in a series of stepwise
extinctions (Keller and Barrera. 1990; Tassy, 1993). If the impact event had an
effect. it was to accelerate the extinctions that were already taking place.
People prefer simple answers and to assert that life is contingent on random events
has a certain appeal in a time in human history when teleological thinking is in
disrepute. But while the Cretaceous-Tertiaty boundary events are capable of diverse
interpretation, those of the FrasniadFamennian are much less so. Although there
may have been an impact(s) near the boundary, the extinction was not caused by
68
an extraterrestrial impact, but by a complex web of uniformitarian, earth-born factors.
The Long Rapids Formation type section records these events faithfully - an anoxic
epicontinental basin under severe stress from sea Jevel changes, change in water
chemistry and climate, and a struggling biota; some species died out and some
survived. This is the very kind of environment that accelerates evolution and creates
new species better adapted to survive these rapidly changing conditions (Eldredge
and Gould, 1 972). In the Late Devonian , Palmatolepis praetriangularis evolved out
of the common gene pool shared by Palmatolepis hassi/Pa. subrectaPa. rotunda
(al1 of which were under stress and subsequently died out), to survive as the sole
ancestor of al1 palmatolepids in the Famennian.
What particular adaptations gave Palmatolepis praetriangularis an evolutionary
edge? Abundant mature specimens of reduced size suggest that one important
advantage the species rnay have had is reproductive prolificacy and progenesis, the
ability to mature faster and reach sexual maturity at a smaller size. Palmatolepis
praetriangularis also had a generalized morphology sharing different features of its
ancestor stock, Palmatolepis hassüPa. subrectaPa. rotunda that may have made it
more adaptable to changing conditions. If lack of oxygen was the cause of the mass
69
dying, another possibility is that Palmatolepis praetriangularis may have developed a
respiratory system that absorbed and utilized what little oxygen there was available
more eff ectivel y. Palmatolepis praet~angularis evolved in to Palmatolepis
triangularis, one of the most prolific and successful species of the Early Famennian.
The only difference between the two species is the inflection of the upper side of the
Pa element posterior platforni; in Palmatolepis praetriangularis it is level or
downbent, in Palrnatolepis triangularis it rises. Was this a selective advantage in
feeding, providing a better fit between opposing Pa elements, for more efficient
crushing (Briggs et al., 1983; Pumell and von Bitter, 1992; Purnell, 1995) and
utilization of what little food there was available, after the mass mortality of phyto-
and zoopfankton? Or was this just an incidental by-product of some more important
evolutionary change in the soft tissue of the conodont animal? Until we find
Devonian soft bodied conodont remains, we cannot know.
The mean survival time of conodont genera from the Cambrian to Triassic is about
30 million years (Sweet, 1988). Palmatolepis survived for only -14 million years,
from the lower Frasnian Palmatolepis transitans Zone into the lower part of the
Siphonodella sulcata Zone in the Dinantian (Ziegler and Sandberg, 1984; Sandberg
70
and Ziegler, 1996). The Long Rapids Formation type section records a major crisis
in this generic history where some 18 palmatolepid species died out, to be replaced
by only one descendant species, a dramatic snapshot of the evolutionary process
during one of the most important extinction events in earth's history. Palmatolepis
praetrfangularis flourished and became the progenitor of dozens of Famennian
species, before the genus becarne extinct just above the Devonian/Carboniferous
boundary (Sandberg et al., 1 978).
Svstematic Palaeontoloay
Order Ozarkodinida Dzi k, 1 976
Family Palmatolepidae Sweet, 1988
Genus Palmatolepis Ufrich and Bassler, 1926
Palmatolepis delica tula delica tula B ranson and Mehl , 1 934
PI. 1, figs. 1, 2
Palmatolepis delicatula delicatula Branson and Mehl, 1934, p. 237. pl. 18, figs. 4,
1 O.
Palmatolepis delicatula delicatula, Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990, p. 67, pl. 17, figs. 1 -
3.
Palmatolepis delicatula delicatula, Morrow, 2000, p. 53, pl. 3, fig. 3
Diagnosis: A very wide triangular Pa element outer lobe, with the posterior and
anterior parts more or less equal. Similar to Palmatolepis jamieae, but with a
straighter outline. This Pb element, recovered from sample 24, is sufficiently different
from the Palmatolepis triangularis Pb element to belong to its related, descendant
species, Palmatolepis delicatula delicatula. Much less flexure in the main bar and
72
larger, subequal anterior teeth distinguish this Pb element from Palmatolepis
trkngula ris.
Material: 976 Pa elements. 1 Pb element
Distribution: Samples 21 -25 in the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Palmatolepis ederi Ziegler and Sandberg, 1 990
PI. 1 Fig. 3
Palmatolepis ederi Ziegler and Sandberg, IWO, pp. 62-63, pl. 9, figs. 1-7; p. 101 , pl.
10, figs. 6-1 0.
Palmatolepis ederi, Morrow, 2000, p. 49, pl. 1 , fig . 1 0.
Diagnosis: Ve ry sim ilar to Palmatolepis linguiformis, Palmatolepis ederi is
distinguishable from the former species by a posterior carina of the Pa element that
does not reach the posterior tip of the platfonn, with smaller posterior carina nodes
than anterior carina nodes and a longer range. Also the parapet area is less
expanded and does not bulge outward, and the platform is less sigmoidal in shape
than Palmatolepis linguiformis.
73
Remarks: The only mature specimens of this species found were in the lower part of
unit 24A (sample 20), Le. the linguiformis Zone.
Material: 13 Pa elements, but only 7 mature specimens.
Distribution: Restricted to sample 20 of the Long Rapids Formation type section,
although some juvenile specimens may have occurred below.
Palmatolepis foliacea Youngquist. 1945
PI. 1, figs. 4, 5
Palmatolepis foliaceus Youngquist, 1 945, pp. 364-365, pl. 56, figs. 1 1 -1 2.
Palmatolepis foliacea, Ziegler and Sandberg. 1990, pp. 49-50, pl. 5, figs. 1-8,11-12.
Palmatolepis foliacea, Norris et ab, 1 992, p. 74, pl. 1 3, fig. 1 3.
Palmatolepis foliacea, Klapper and Foster, 1993, p. 8, fig. 6.1-6.9.
Diagnosis: a species with a non-lobed, ovoid, nodose platfom and a wrinkly ovoid
border.
Remarks: a well established, non-controversial species that became extinct at the
top of the Late rhenana Zone.
74
Material: 193 mature Pa elements, al1 from the Williams Island Formation type
section type section. The specirnen illlustrated by Noms et al. (1 992) was from the
Long Rapids Formation type section. This study found no specimens of Palmatolepis
foliacea in the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Distribution: Williams lsland Formation type section samples 1-6.
Palmatolepis gigas Miller and Youngquist, 1947
PI. 1, fig. 6
Palmatolepis gigas Miller and Youngquist, 1947 p. 51 2-51 3, pl. 75, fig. 1.
Palmatolepis gigas gigas, Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990, p. 54. pl. 7, figs. 1-6; p. 97,
pl. 8, figs. 5-7.
Palmatolepis gigas gigas, Monow, 2000, p. 49, pl. 1, fig. 6.
Diagnosis: a straight canna, a long, pointed outer lobe, and a long rostrum
characterize this species.
Remarks: this species extends into the late linguiformis Zone (Ziegler and
Sandberg. 1990). but at the Long Rapids Formation type section, does not go
beyond unit 21 (sample 17).
Material: 6 Pa elements.
Distribution: Samples 2, 5, 6, Williams Island Formation type section and samples
10, 17, Long Rapids Formation type section.
Palmatolepis hassi Müller and Müller, 1957
PI. 1, figs. 7, 8, 9
Palmatolepis (Mantico/epis) hassi Miiller and Müller, 1957, pp. 1102-1 103, pl. 139,
fig. 2; pl. 140, figs. 2-4.
Palmatolepis hassi, Ziegler and Sandberg, 1 990, pp. 55-56, pl. 2. figs. 2-9; p. 1 05,
pl. 12, figs. 10-1 1
Palmatolepis hassi, Klapper and Lane, 1 993, p. 22, figs. 1 5.1 - 1 5.9 (Pa element); p.
27, figs. 18.12; 19.1 6-1 9.18 (Pb elernent).
Palmatolepis hassi, Schindfer etal., 1998. p. 260, pl. 5, fig. 31.
Diagnosis: The Pa element of Palmatolepis hassi has a general rotund shape, but
with a conspicuous upward and outward bulge of the outer anterior platform and a
strongly convex outer posterior lobe. The Pb element has a moderately arched
platform with higher anterior denticles than posterior, and a wide inner platform up to
two-thirds the overall length and narrow outer platform.
76
Remarks: a non-controversial species that ranges from close to the base of the Long
Rapids Formation type section into the Palmatolepis linguifomis Zone.
Material: 62 Pa elements. 48 Pb elements
Distribution: Samples 8, 9, 12-20 in the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Palmatolepis jamieae Ziegler and Sandberg, 1 990
PI. 1 fig. 10
Palmatolepis jamieae Ziegler and Sandberg, 1 990, pp. 50-5 1 , pl. 6, figs. 1 - 1 0; p.
103, pl. 1 1, figs. 4-6.
Diagnosis: A species with a large, trapezoid shaped very broad outer platform,
similar in shape to Palmatolepis delicatï.'a, but more irregular in outline.
Remarks: This is only the second reported occurrence of this species.
Material: 5 Pa elements.
Distribution: Samptes 19 and 20, Long Rapids Formation type section.
Palmatolepis juntianensis Han, 1 987
PI. 1, fig. 11
Palmatolepis juntianensis Han, 1 987, p. 1 86, pl. 1 , figs. 1 5- 1 6.
Palmatolepis juntianensis, Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990, p. 52, pl. 14, figs. 16-1 7.
Palmatolepis juntianensis, Morrow, 2000, p. 49, pl. 1. fig. 8.
Diagnosis: The Pa element platfonn of this species is reduced and the posterior part
bulges out close to the posterior tip, giving it a distinctive clublike appearance.
Remarùs: Pa. juntianensis has a range very similar to Palmatolepis linguifomis,
basically restricted to the area of the immediate boundary.
Material: 74 Pa elements.
Distribution: Samples 17, 19-21 of the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Palmatolepis linguiformis Müller , 1 956
PI. 1 fig. 12
Palmatolepis linguiformis Müller, 1956 pp. 24-25, pl. 7, figs. 1-7.
Palmatolepis linguiformis, Ziegler and Sandberg, 1 990, pp. 59-60. pl. 1 4, figs. 8-1 0.
Palmatolepis linguiformis, Schindler et al., 1998, p. 261, pl. 5, fig. 30.
Palmatolepis linguifomis, Morrow, 2000, p. 51, pl. 2, figs. 4-5.
78
Diagnosis: Very similar to Palmatolepis ederi, except the canna of the Pa element
extends al1 the way to the posterior tip and the curvature of the canna and the
platfonn is more pronounced.
Remarks: in contrast to most F/F boundaries, a significant number of the nominate
species (64) was found at the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Material: 64 Pa elements.
Distribution: Samples 20 and 21, Long Rapids Formation type section.
Palmatolepis minuta minuta Branson and Mehl, 1934
PI. 1. fig. 13
Palmatolepis minuta minuta Branson and Mehl, 1934, p. 236, plate 18, figs. 1,6,7.
Palmatolepis minuta minuta, Ziegler, 1977, p. 387, pl. 9, figs. 1-5.
Palamatolepis minuta minuta, Morrow, 2000, p. 51, pl. 2, fig. 8.
Diagnosis: similar to Palmatolepis protorhomboidea but with a much reduced outer
platforrn, though still trïangular in shape.
Remarks: Sandberg and Ziegler (1 990) reported that this species represents the
boundary between the Middle and Upper Palmatolepis triangularis Zone.
Material: 39 Pa elernents.
79
Distribution: Samples 23-25, 27, 28 of the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Palmatolepis plana Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990
PI. 1, fig. 15-1 9
Palmatolepis plana Ziegler and Sandberg, 1 990, p. 46, pl. 3, figs. 1 - 1 0.
Palmatolepis domanicensis, Klapper, 1 989, pl. 1 , figs. 1 , 2.
Palmatolepis plana, Morrow, 2000, p. 49, pl. 1, fig. 1.
Diagnosis: A species similar to Palmatolepis foliacea with the same stratigraphie
range, but possessing more of a developed outer lobe on the Pa element.
Material: 7 Pa element specimens.
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, samples 1, 4.
Palmatolepis praetriangularis Ziegler and Sandberg in Sandberg et al., 1988
PI. 1, figs. 15-1 9
Palmatolepis triangularis O element, v.d. Boogaard and Kuhry, 1979, p. 34, fig. 5.
Palmatolepis praetriangularis Ziegler and Sandberg in Sandberg et al., 1 988. pp.
298-299, pl. 1, figs. 1-4.
Palmatolepis praetriangularis, Qiang, 1989, p. 295, pl. 3, figs. 1 1 to 18.
Palmatolepis praetriangularis, Schindler, 1 990a, pl. 5, figs. 6A, B.
Palmatolepis praetriangularis, Ziegler and Sandberg, 1 990, p. 42, text-fig. 1 0.
Palmatolepis sp. A Noms et al., 1992, p. 75, pl. 12, figs. 5, 6.
Palmatolepis triangularis, Wang and Geldsetzer, 1995, p. 1830, pl. 1, figs. 8, 9.
Palmatolepispraetriangularis, Girard etal., 1997, p. 394, figs. 3.1, 3.2.
Palmatolepis praetriangularis, Schindler et al., 1998, p. 259, pl. 4, fig. 16.
Palmatolepis praetria~gularis, Renaud and Girard, 1 999, p. 20, fig. 1 . b.
Palmatolepis praetriangularis, Morrow, 2000, p. 51 , pl. 2, figs. 6, 7.
Diagnosis: A species with a distinctive triangular shaped Pa element similar to
Palmatolepis triangularis, but with a platform that is flat or descends gently
posteriorward from the central node. The Pb element of Palmatolepis
praetriangularis is indistinguishable from Palmatolepis triangularis, an arched
nothognathellid platform with the anterior denticles gradually increasing in size to the
flexure points. It differs from subrecta in having no platfom development on the
outer side and in the graduai increase in denticle sire.
8 1
Remarks: Palmatolepis praetnangularis has a wide range of morphological variation
consistent with its derivation from the Palmatolepis hassi/rotunda/subrecta gene
pool. Some samples are intermediate in rnorphology and close to a 'late form' of
Palmatolepis subrecta (Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990, pl. 16, figs. 1-6) except for a
more triangular, pointed outer lobe, a tip always more anterior that the central node
and a more sigrnoidal carina. Norris et al. (1 992) illustrated one of these elements
from the lower part of the Long Rapids Formation type section as "Palmatolepis sp.
A . The species has been controversial, with Klapper et al. (1 993) synonymizing
Palmatolepis praetriangularis wit h Palmatolepis triangularis; th is st udy , howeve r,
supports the existence of Palmatolepis praetriangularis as a separate and distinct
species. See text for full discussion.
Material: 1238 Pa elements (51 3 and 725 mature and juvenile specimens,
respect ively) .
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, samples 1-6; Long Rapids
Formation type section, samples 7-2 1.
82
Palmatolepis protorhomboidea Sand berg and Ziegler , 1 973
PI. 2, fig. 1
Palmatolepis delicatula protohomboidea Sandberg and Ziegler, 1 973. p. 1 03, pl. 1 ,
figs. 14-1 9.
Palmatolepis protorhomboidea, Ziegler and Sandberg, 1 990, p. 68, pl. 1 7, figs. 8-
11.
Diagnosis: Similar in shape to Palmatolepis delicatula delicatula but smaller and
with an anterior outer lobe which meets the platforni considerably below the anterior
tip.
Remarks: a species characteristic of the Early triangularis Zone.
Material: 163 Pa elements.
Distribution: Samples 22, 24. 25, 27 in the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Palmatolepis rhenana nasuta Müller , 1 956
PI. 2 fig. 2
Palrnatolepis (Manticolepis) nasuta Müller, 1 956, pp. 23-24, pl. 6, figs. 3 1 -35.
Palamtolepis rhenana Bischoff, 1 956, p. 1 29, pl. 8, figs. 26-28, 30; pl. 10, fig. 7
Palmatolepis rhenana, Orchard, 1988, p. 43, pl. 1, fig. 16.
Palmatolepis rhenana nasuta, Ziegler and Sandberg , 1 990. p. 57, pl. 1 2, f igs. 4-9; p.
1 1 1, pl. 15, figs. 2,4,5.
Palmatolepis rhenana nasuta, Wang and Geldsetzer, 1 995, p. 1 83 1, pl. 2, fig. 5.
Diagnosis: A species with a sigrnoidal carina and a long, thin outer lobe on its Pa
element.
Remarùs: More common than rhenana rhenana, Palmatolepis rhenana nasuta is
present from the Williams Island Formation type section to the Palmatolepis
linguifonnis Zone boundary shale of the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Material: 62 Pa elements.
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, samples 1, 2 4-6; Long Rapids
Formation type section, samples 13, 20.
Palmtolepis rhenana rhenana Bischoff, 1 956
PI. 2, fig. 3
Palamtolepis rhenana Bischoff, 1956, p. 129. pl. 8, figs. 26-28, 30; pl. 10. fig. 7.
Palamtolepis rhenana, Klapper, 1 989, p. 458, pl. 2, figs. 1 , 1 3
84
Palamtolepis rhenana thenana Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990, pp. 57-58, pl. 12, figs.
1 -3; p. 1 1 1, pl. 1 5, figs, 1,3, 6-7.
Palamtolepis rhenana, Klapper and Lane, 1 993, p. 24, fig. 16.1 ; figs. 17.3-1 0.
Palamtokpis rhenana rhenana, Morrow, 2000, p. 49, pl. 1, figs. 4-5
Diagnosis: an easily recognizable species, because of a long, thin, pointed outer
lobe on its Pa element- thinner and more pointed than Palmatolepis rhenana
nasuta.
Remarks: This is the index fossil for the start of the Late Palmatolepis rhenana Zone.
Some workers (e.g. Klapper and Lane, 1993) do not recognize this subspecies, only
naming it to the specific level.
Material: 3 Pa elements.
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, sample 4.
Palmatolepis rotunda, Ziegler and Sandberg, 1 990
PI. 2, figs. 4,5, 6
Palmatolepis canadensis Orchard, 1988, p. 44, pl. 2, figs. 15, 16, 23.
Palmatolepis bogartensis Klapper, 1989, p. 458, pl. 2, figs. 7-8.
Palmatolepis rotunda Ziegler and Sandberg, 1 990, p. 62, pl. 1 0, figs. 1 -5.
Palamatolepis bogartensis, Klapper and Foster, 1 993, pp. 1 8-1 9, fig. 13.4-1 6 (Pa
element), p. 28, fig. 19.1 -5 (Pb element).
Palmatolepis rotunda, Wang and Geldsetzer, 1995, p. 1831, pl. 2, figs. 1-3.
Palmatolepis rotunda. Morrow, 2000, p. 51, pl. 2, fig. 1 .
Diagnosis: a round circular platform shape with a round outer posterior lobe. The Pb
element is refatively flat (non-arched) with the cusp not much higher than the
anterior denticles and low posterior denticles. A wide inner platform.
Remarks: Although the specific name of this species may be a junior synonym of
Nothognathella bogartensis Stauffer, 1 938, plate 48, figure 30 (Klapper, 1 989), the
latter Pb element may be vicarious in a number of similar apparatuses.
Material: 334 Pa elements (1 61 mature specimens and 1 73 juveniles); 6 Pb
specimens
Distribution: Palmatolepis rotunda is a widespread species in the Long Rapids
Formation type section extending from the underlying Williams Island Formation type
section up to the F/F boundary (sample 1 to sample 20, except units 8 and 15 where
the species is absent).
Palmatolepis cf. Pa. semicha tovae
PI. 2, fig. 7
Rernarks: The strongly developed outer lobe is reminiscent of Palmatolepis
semichatovae; however this latter species does not range out of the Frasnian.
Material: one Pa element recovered from the Long Rapids Formation type section
sarnple 25, which is about 30 cm above the F/F boundary.
Palmatolepis subrecta Miller and Y oungquist, 1 947
PI. 2, figs. 8-10
Bryantodus winchelli Stauffer, 1938, p. 423, pl. 48, fig. 33
Palmatolepis subrecta Miller and Youngquist, 1947, p. 51 3. pl. 75, figs. 7-1 1
Palmatolepis subrecta, v. d. Boogaard and Khury, 1979, p. 31, fig. 1.
Palmatolepis subrecta, Orchard, 1 988, p. 43, pl. 1 , figs. 20,21,24.
Palmatolepis winchelli, Klapper, 1989, p. 458, pl. 2, fig. 5.
Palmatolepis subrecta, Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990, pp. 60-61, pl. 1 1, figs. 3, 7-1 2;
pl. 15, figs. 8-9; pl. 16, figs. 1-6.
Palmatolepis winchelli, Norris et al., 1992, p. 75, pl. 13, figs. 1, 4, 5 (Pa elements).
87
Palamatolepis winchelli, Pb element, Klapper and Foster. 1993, pp. 24,26,31, figs.
19.6-1 9.12.
Palmatolepis winchelli, Over, 1997, p. 172, figs. 6.6, 6.7.
Palmatolepis subrecta, Schindler et al., 1998, p. 259, pl. 5. figs. 27-29.
Palmatolepis subrecta, Morrow, 2000, p. 51, pl. 2, figs. 2-3.
Diagnosis: A species with an ovate to elongate Pa element with a relatively straight
carina and a pointed outer lobe whose tip is in line with the central node. The Pb
element has a moderate to strongly arched platfonn (30 - 70 degrees) with a high
cusp and anterior denticles higher than posterior. It has a well-developed platforni on
the inner side with a platform on the outer side confined generally to the posterior
part or just the centre. The denticles are fused and those of the anterior subequal.
Remarks: A well established species whose specific name is contentious. Although
the specific name of Bryantodus winchelli Stauffer, 1938, a Pb element, may have
priority, numerous authors (Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990; Schindler et al., 1998;
Morrow, 2000) have considered this and similar Pb elements to be vicarious, and
have continued to use the species name subrecta for this species. Pa subrecta
88
occurs throughout the Long Rapids Formation type section and survives until just
past the F/F boundary.
Material: 480 Pa elements (366 mature + 114 juvenile specimens) and 352 Pb
elements.
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, samples 1, 2,4; Long Rapids
Formation type section, samples 1 1, 15, 17-21.
Palma tolepis triangula ris San nem ann , 1 955
PI. 2, figs. 1 1-1 7
Palmatolepis triangularis Sannemann, 1955, pp. 327-328, pl. 24, fig. 3.
Palmatolepis triangularis O element, v.d. Boogaard and Kuhry, 1979, p. 34, fig. 5.
Palmatolepis triangularis, Orchard, 1988, p. 47, pl. 3, figs. 6, 10.
Palmatolepis canadensis, Orchard. 1988, p. 47, pl. 3, fig. 9.
Palmatolepis triangularis, Ziegler and Sandberg, 1990, pp. 64-65, pl. 14, figs. 1-5.
Palmatolepis triangularis, Over, 1997, p. 171, figs. 10.1-10.5.
Palmatolepis triangularis, Morrow, 2000, p. 51, pl. 2, fig. 9.
Diagnosis: The platform shape has quite a bit of variation to it, but al1 specimens
have a general triangular shape with the tip of the outer lobe higher than the central
89
node. The posterior platforni bends upwards, a feature characteristic of Famennian
species. The Pb element of Palmatolepis triangulans consists of an arched
nothognathellid platfom with the anterior denticles gradually increasing in size to the
flexure points. It differs from subrecta in having no platforni development on the
outer side and in the gradua1 increase in denticle size.
Rernarks: The F/F boundary is defined by the first "flood occurrence" (Klapper et al.,
1993) of Palmatolepis triangularis, which starts at sample 21. There are thousands
of specimens and they are easily distinguishable from Pa. praetriangularis, in that
the posterior tip clearly rises. and their fonn is more cornpletely triangulated.
Material: 2895 Pa elements. 202 Pb elements.
Distribution: sample 21 -25, 27, Long Rapids Formation type section.
Family Polygnathidae Bassler, 1925
Genus Ancyrodella Ulrich and Bassler, 1926
Ancyrodella bucûeyensis Stauff er, 1 938
PI. 3, fig. 1
Ancyrodella buckeyensis Stauffer, 1938, p. 41 8, pl. 52, figs. 17. 18, 23, 24.
Ancyrodella buckeyensis, Over, 1 997, p. 1 72, fig. 1 1 .1- 1 1 -9.
90
Diagnosis: A distinctive 'arrowhead' shape with straight to slightly cuived carina
extending well above the platform.
Remarks: Although most ancyrodellids were casualties of the F/F extinction event,
this species survived as far as unit 24E in the Famennian, about 30 cm above the
F/F boundary.
Material: 108 Pa elements.
Distribution: Samples 13-1 5, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, 25 in the Long Rapids Formation
type section.
Ancyrodella curvata Branson and Mehl, 1934
PI. 3, fig.2
Ancyrodella cuwata Branson and Mehl, 1934, p. 241, pl. 19, figs. 6, 11.
Ancyrodella cuwata, Klapper, 1989, p. 457, pl. 3, figs. 18-20.
Ancyrodella curva ta, Over , p. 1 74, f ig . 1 1 -1 0- 1 1 .14.
Diagnosis: Ancyrodella curvata has a distinctive four lobed structure which makes it
easy to identify.
Material: 13 Pa elements.
Distribution: Sample 20 in the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Ancyrodella nodosa Ulrich and Bassler 1 926
Pl. 3, fig. 3
Ancyrodella nodosa Ulrich and Bassler, 1926, p. 48, pl. 1, figs. 10-1 3.
Ancyrodella nodosa, Klapper and Lane, 1985, p. 925, figs. 14.6, 14.7, 14.10, 14.1 1.
Ancyrodella nodosa, Norris etal., p. 72, 1992 pl. 16, figs. 1-6.
Ancyrodella nodosa, Morrow, 2000, p. 55, pl. 4, fig. 1.
Diagnosis: Ancyrodella nodosa is simi lar to Ancyrodella buckeyensis -but
distinguished by more pronounced surface nodes and a distinct constriction in the
posterior part of the platfom margin which gives the overall platfom shape two
different angles.
Remarks: The most plentiful of the ancyrodellids.
Material: 267 Pa elements
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, samples 1-6; Long Rapids
Formation type section, samples 7, 8, 1 0, 1 2-21 .
Genus Ancyrognathus Branson and Mehl, 1 934
Ancyrognathus asymmetricus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926
PI. 3, fig. 4
Ancyrognathus asymmetricus Ulrich and Bassler, 1926, p. 50, pl. 7, fig. 8.
Ancyroides asymmetrica, Müller and Müller, 1957, p. 1098, pl. 138, figs. 8,9.
Ancyrognathus asymmetrkus, Ziegler, 1973, p. 41, pl. 2, figs. 4,5.
Ancyrognathus asymmetricus, Klapper, 1989, p. 458, pl. 4, figs. 8, 12.
Diagnosis: Also a trilobate species, but outer and inner margins of the platfon are
straighter than Ancyrognathus calvini, and ends of the lobes are pointed. Lobes are
also distinctly asymmetrical.
Rernarks: This is the most plentiful of the Ancyrognathus species. They all die out at
the F/F boundary with the exception of Ancyrognathus ubiquitus which survives (but
not in the Long Rapids Fm.) briefly into the Famennian (Sandberg et al., 1988).
Material: 79 Pa elements.
Distribution: Samples 11, 14-21 of the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Ancyrognathus calvini Miller and Youngquist, 1947
PI. 3, fig. 5
Ancyroides calvini Miller and Youngquist, 1947, p. 504, pl. 75, fig. 4.
Ancyroides calvini, Müller and Müller, 1957, p. 1098. pl. 138, fig. 6
Ancyrognathus calvini, Ziegler, 1981, pl. 4, figs. 3-6.
Diagnosis: a subsymmetrical species with a rounded lobe, trilobate platform and a
short median blade.
Material: 4 Pa elernents.
Distribution: Samples 17. 19, 20 in the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Ancyrognathus triangularis Y ou ngq u ist , 1 945
PI. 3, fig. 6
Ancyrognathus triangularis Youngquist, 1945, p. 356. pl. 54, fig. 7.
Ancyrognathus triangularis, Ziegler, 1981, pl. 5, figs. 1-10.
Ancyrognathus tnangulans, Klapper, 1989, p. 458, pl. 4, figs. 6, 7.
Ancyrognathus tnangulans, Noms et al., 1992, p. 73, pl. 17, figs. 5, 6, 8, 9.
Ancyrognathus triangularis, Morrow, 2000, p. 53, pl. 3, fig. 8.
Diagnosis: A more or less triangular species with outer and inner rnargins relatively
straight and the angle between the main and secondary canna 90 degrees or more.
Remarks: This is the widest ranging of the ancyrognathids, found in the Williams
Island Formation type section up to the uppermost Frasnian (Kellwasser-like)
limestone bed (unit 22, or sample 18) in the Long Rapids Formation type section.
Material: 26 Pa elements.
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, samples 1-6; Long Rapids
Formation type section, samples 8, 9, 13, 17, 18.
Ancyrognathus ubiquitus Sandberg, Ziegler and Dreesen, 1 988
PI. 3, fig. 7
Ancyrognathus ubiquitus Sandberg , Ziegler and Dreesen, 1 988, pp. 297-298, pl. 1 ,
figs. 5, 6; pl 2, figs. 1-7.
Ancyrognathus ubiquitus, Schindler, 1 WOa, pl. 5, fig. 7.
95
Diagnosis: This species is recognized by its long, thin outer lobe (which is broken in
the single specimen recovered) and ovate inner platform. The free blade is also
absent in this specimen.
Remarks: All ancyrognathids died out at the boundary, except for
Ancyrognathus ubiquitus that suivived for a short time; however, at the Long Rapids,
only one (partially broken) specimen of ubiquitus was found.
Material: 1 Pa element.
Distribution: Sample 20, Long Rapids Formation type section.
Family Icriodontidae Müller and Müller, 1957
Genus lcriodus Branson and Mehl, 1938
lcriodus alternatus alternatus Branson and Mehl, 1934
PI. 3, fig. 8
lcriodus alternatus alternatus Branson and Mehl, 1934, pp. 225-6, pl. 13, figs. 4-6.
lcnodus alternatus alternatus, Wang and Geldsetzer, 1995, p. 1832, pl. 3, figs. 1 6-
19.
lcriodus altematus alternatus, Over, 1997, p. 168, fig. 10.14.
lcrbdus alternatus altematus, Morrow, 2000, p. 55. pl. 4, fig. 7.
Diagnosis: Central denticles altemate with side denticles in this common species.
Remarks: the icriodids survived the FIF extinction and are a shallow water species;
their significant increase in numbers around the boundary is interpreted to indicate a
marine regression (Sandberg et al., 1988).
Material: 160 Pa elements.
Distribution: Long Rapids Formation type section, samples 20-26.
lcriodus symmetricus Branson and Mehl. 1 934
Pl. 3, fig. 9
lcriodus symmetricus Branson and Mehl, 1934. p. 226. pl. 1 3, figs. 1-3.
Icriodus symmetricus, Ziegler. 1 973, pl. 3, figs. 7, 8.
lcriodus symmetricus, Norris et al., 1 992, p. 71, pl. 16. figs. 7-1 6.
lcriodus symmetricus, Morrow, 2000, p. 55, pl. 4. fig. 3.
Diagnosis: The three rows of denticles are more or less in line, distinguishing this
species frorn the previous one.
97
Remarks: lcriodus symmetricus is most prevalent in the Williams Island Formation
type section. whereas lcriodus altematus alternatus, which is also found in the
Williams Island Formation type section, doesn't proliferate until the highest Frasnian
and early Famennian.
Material: 99 Pa elements.
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, sarnples 1-6; Long Rapids
Formation type section, sampies 7, 10, 18, 20, 25.
Genus Polygnathus Hinde, 1 879
Polygnathus brevilaminus Branson and Mehl 1934
PI. 3, fig. 10
Polygnathus brevilamina Branson and Mehl, 1934. p. 246, pl. 21 , figs. 3-6.
Polygnathus brevilaminus, Orchard, 1988. p. 49, pl. 4, figs. 12, 18.
Polygnathus brevilaminus, Morrow, 2000, p. 57, pl. 5, fig. 11.
Diagnosis: A distinctive species where the platforni is only about one third the length
of the overall unit and the carina extends well below and above the platform.
Material: 12 Pa elements.
Distribution: Long Rapids Formation type section, samples 23, 25.
Polygnathus decorosus Stauffer, 1938
PI. 3, fig. 11
Polygnathus decorosus Stauffer, 1938, p. 438, pl. 53, figs. 5,6, 10, 15, 16.
Polygnathus decorosus, Klapper and Lane, 1985, p. 935, fig. 18.7.
Polygnathus decorosus, Norris et al., 1 992, p. 77, pl. 1 4, figs. 9- 1 7.
Polygnathus decorosus, Over, 1997, p. 174, fig. 10.1 1.
Diagnosis: A long, narrow species with a pointed posterior tip. free blade up to half
the unit length, and strong transverse ridges on the upper surface of the platform.
Remarks: The most long ranging of the polygnathid species in the Long Rapids
Formation type section.
Material: 4185 Pa elements
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, samples 1-6; Long Rapids
Formation type section, samples 7-20, 22, 24, 25.
Polygnathus elegantulus Klapper and Lane 1985
PI. 3, fig. 12
Polygnathus elegantulus Klapper and Lane, 1 985, p. 935, figs. 1 8.8-1 8.1 4, 2 1.8.
Diagnosis: A species of narrow to moderate width and symrnetrical overall shape
with the platforni and the free blade each about half the unit length.
Remarks: This species is present in the Palmatolepis linguiformis Zone and Early
Palmatolepis triangularis Zone.
Material: 5 18 Pa elernents.
Distribution: Long Rapids Formation type section. samples 20-25, 27.
Polygnathus evidens Klapper and Lane, 1985
PI. 3, fig. 13
Polygnathus evidens Klapper and Lane, 1985. p. 935, figs. 20.1 -20.8.
Polygnathus evidens, Norris et al., 1992, p. 78, pl. 14, figs. 18. 22-29.
Diagnosis: A very short free blade with large ascending denticles and a deep
adcarinal trough characterke this species.
1 0 0
Remarks: All specimens of Polygnathus evidens were found in the Williams Island
Formation type section.
Material: 12 Pa elements.
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, samples 2, 4-6.
Polygnathus webbi Stauffer, 1938
PI. 3, fig. 14
Polygnathus webbi Stauffer, 1938, p. 439, pl. 53. figs. 25, 26, 28, 29.
Polygnathus webbi, Klapper and Lane, 1985, p. 944, fig. 16.1 8.
Polygnathus webbi, Over, 1997, p. 174, fig. 10.13.
Diagnosis: A curved platform shape with subequal sides and a carina that continues
to the posterior tip characterize this species.
Remarks: although Polygnathus webbi was not supposed to have survived the F/F
extinction (Klapper et al., 1993) this is not the only section where this species ranges
into the Early Palmatolepis triangularis Zone (see Schindler et al., 1998, table 1 ).
Material: 17 Pa elements.
Distribution: Williams Island Formation type section, sample 4; Long Rapids
Formation type section, samples 9, 14. 15, 20, 22, 24.
References
Abercrombie, M., Hickman, M., Johnson, M.L., and Thain, M. 1992.
The New Penguin Dictionary of Biology. Penguin Books, London.
Acres International Ltd. 1989. Ontario Hydro Abitibi River Hydroelectric
Development, Nine Mile Rapids Site, volume 1 (46 p.), vol. 2 (38 p.).
Ager, D. 1993. The New Catastrophism. Cambridge University Press,
Cambridge.
Algeo, T.J., Berner, R.A., Maynard, J. B., and Scheckler, S.E. 1995. Cate
Devonian oceanic anoxic events and biotic crises: "rootedn in the evolution of
vascular land plants? Geological Society of America Today, 5 (3)45:64-66.
Algeo, T.J. and Scheckler, S.E. Terrestrial-marine teleconnections in the
Devonian: links between the evolution of land plants, weathering processes, and
marine anoxic events. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B (1 998) 353:115-130.
Allaby, A., and Allaby, M. IWO. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Earth Sciences
Oxford University Press, New York.
Alvarez, L. W., Alvarez, W., Asaro, F., and Michel, H.V. 1 980. Extraterrestrial
cause for the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction. Science, 208: 1095-1 108.
Armstrong, D. K., Russell, O. J. and Johnson, M. D. 1988. Geology and
resource potential of the Upper Devonian Kettle Point Formation of Ontario. ln The
nineteenth annual Appalachian petroteum geology symposium; Geology of
Appalachian Basin Devonian clastics Circular - West Virginia Geological and
Economic Survey, page 4.
Bai, S.L., Bai, Z.Q., Ma, X.P., Wang, DR., and Sun, Y .L. 1994. Devonian
Events and Biostratigraphy of South China, Peking University Press, Beijing.
Baird, G.C. and Brett, C.E. 1986. Erosion of an aerobic seafloor: Significance
of reworked pyrite deposits from the Devonian of New York State.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 57: 157-1 93.
Bezys, R.K. 1991. An ichnological and sedimentological study of Devonian
black shales from the Long Rapids Formation, Moose River Basin. Northem Ontario,
Open File Report - Ontario Geological Survey, Report: 5744.
Bezys, R. and Risk, M. J. 1990. The Long Rapids Formation: an Upper
Devonian black shale in the Moose River Basin, northem Ontario. Canadian Journal
of Earth Sciences, 27: 291 -305.
Bischoff, G. 1956. Oberdevonische Conodonten (to-1-delta) aus dem
Rheinischen Schiefergebirge, Hessisches Landesamt Bodenforschung Notizblatt,
84: 1 1 5-1 37.
Boogaard, M. van den and Khury, B. 1979. Statistical reconstruction of the
Palmatolepis apparatus (Late Oevonian conodontophorids) at the generic,
subgeneric and specific level. Scripta Geologica 49: 1-57.
Branson, E.B. and Mehl, M.G. 1934. Conodonts from the Grassy Creek shale
of Missouri. Missouri University Studies, 8, 3:172-259.
Bratton, J. F., Berry, W. B.N., Morrow, J. R. 1999. Anoxia pre-dates Frasnian-
Famennian boundary mass extinction horizon in the Great Basin, U.S.A.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 154: 275-292.
Brett, C.E. and Baird, G.C. 1985. Carbonate-shale cycles in the Middle
Devonian of New York: An evaluation of rnodels for the origin of lirnestones in
terrigenous shelf sequences. Geology, 13: 324-327.
Briggs, D. E.G., Clarkson, E. N.K. and Aldridge, R. J. 1983. The Conodont animal.
Lethaia, 16: 1 - 14.
104
Calvert, S.E., 1976. The mineralogy and geochemistry of near-shore
sediments. In Riley, J.R., and Chester, R., (eds.), Chemical Oceanography, Volume
6. Academic Press, New York. pp. 1 87-280.
Cameron. J.S., and Coniglio, M. 1990. Early diagenesis in a potential oil
shale; evidence from calcite concretions in the Upper Devonian Kettle Point
Formation, southwestern Ontario. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology 38: 64-
77.
Claeys, P., Kyte, F.T., Herbosch, A. and Casier, J.-G. 1996. Geochemistry of
the Frasnian-Famennian boundary in Belgium: Mass extinction, anoxic oceans and
microtektite layer, but not much iridium? In Ryder, G.. Fastovsky, D., Gartner, S.,
(eds.), The Cretaceous-Tertiary event and other catastrophes in Earth history.
Geological Society of America Special Paper 307:491-503.
Clark, David L., et al. 1981. Treatise on lnvertebrate Paleontology, Part W
Miscellanea, Supplement 2 Conodonta, Geological Society of America, Inc.,
Boulder, Colorado and The University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas.
Copper, P. 1986. FrasniadFamennian mass extinction and cold-water
oceans, Geology, 14: 835-839.
105
-------------- . 1998. Evaluating the Frasnian-Famennian mass extinction:
Comparing brachiopod faunas. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 43,2: 137-1 54.
Cuvier, G. 181 2. Recherches sur less ossemens fossiles de quadrupèdes,
discours préliminaire, tome 1. Deterville, Paris.
Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. Penguin
Books, London (re-printed 1985).
Dawkins, R. 1988. The Blind Watchmaker. Penguin Books, London.
Dzik, J., 1976. Rernarks on the evolution of Ordovician conodonts Acta
Palaeontologica Polonica, 21 : 395-455.
Eldredge, N., and Gould, S.J. 1972. Punctuated equilibria: an alternative to
phyletic gradualism. In Schopft, T. J .M. ed., Paleobiology . Freeman, Cooper, San
Francisco. pp. 82-1 15.
Getdsetzer, H.H.J., Goodfellow, W.D., and McLaren, D.J. 1993. The
Frasnian-Famennian extinction event in a stable cratonic shelf setting: Trout River
NWT. Canada. Palaeogeography. Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 104: 81 -95.
Gilmour, I., Wolbach, W.S. and Anders, E. 1 990. Early environmental effects
of the terminal Cretaceous impact. In Sharpton, V.L. and Ward, P.D., (eds.), Global
Catastrophes in Earth History, Geological Society of America Special Paper
247:383-390
Girard, C., Robin, E., Rocchia, R., Froget, L. and Feist, R. 1997. Search for
impact remains at the Frasnian-Famennian boundary in the stratotype area,
southem France. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 132: 39 1 -
397.
Glenister, B.F. Klapper and G. Chauff, K.M. 1976. Conodont pearls?
Science, 193,4253: 571 -573.
Goodfellow, W.D., Geldsetzer, H.H.J., McLaren, D.J., Orchard, M. J., and
Klapper, G. 1988. The Frasnian-Famennian extinction: Current results and possible
causes. In McMillan, N.J., Embry, A.F., Glass, D.J., (eds.), Devonian of the world.
Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 14:9-21.
Gould, S.J. 1994. The Evolution of Life on the Earth. Scientific American, 271,
4: 85-91.
_-_-_____ 1977. Ontogeny and Phylogeny, Belknap Press of Haward
University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, London, England.
Hallam, A. and Wignall, P.B. 1997. Mass Extinctions and Their Afterrnath.
Oxford University Press, Oxford.
107
..................................... . 1999. Mass extinctions and sea-level changes.
Earth-Science Reviews 48:217-250.
Han, Y., 1987. Study on Upper Devopnian FrasniarVFamennian boundary in
Ma-Anshan, Zhongping, Xiangzhou, Guangxi. Chinese Academy of Geological
Sciences Bulletin, 17: 1 il -1 94.
Harland, W.B., Armstrong, R.L., Cox, A. V., Craig, L E , Smith, AG. and
Smith D.G. 1990. A geologic time scale 1989 - 263 pp. and wall chart. Cambridge
University Press, Cambridge.
Hawkesworth, C.J. 1981. Trace element and isotope geochemistry. ln David
G. Smith, editor-in-chief, The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Earth Sciences.
Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 140-1 63 .
Hoefs, J. 1997. Stable Isotope Geochemistry, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
Hou, H.F., Muchez, P., Swennen, R., Hertogen, J., Yan, Z. and Zhou, H.L.
1996. The Frasnian-Famennian event in Hunan Province, south China:
biotratigraphical, sedimentological and geochemical evidence in Coen, M., Hance,
L., Hou, H.F. (eds.), Papers on the Devonian-Carboniferous transition beds of
central Hunan, south China. lnstitute of Geology. Belgium and Chinese Academy of
Geological Sciences, Beijing.
1 O8
Joachimski, M. M. and Buggisch, W. 1993. Anoxic events in the late Frasnian
Causes of the Frasnian-Famennian faunal cnsis? Geology, 21 : 675-678.
Joachimski, M. M. 1997. Comparison of organic and inorganic carbon isotope
patterns across the Frasnian-Famennian boundary Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 132: 1 33-1 45.
Johnson, M.D. 1985. Ontario Geological Survey Open File Report 5531 Oil
Shale Assessment Project, Shallow Drilling Results, 198211 983 Kettle Point and
Marcellus Formations, Ministry of Natural Resources.
Johnson, MD.. Armstrong, D.K., Sanford. B.V., Telford, P.G., and Rutka,
M.A. 1992. Paleozoic and Mesozoic Geology of Ontario. In Thurston P.C., Williams,
H.R., Sutcliffe, RH., and Stott, G.M., (eds.). Geology of Ontario, Ontario Geological
Suwey Special Volume, 4,2:907-1008.
Keller, G. and Barrera, E. 1990. The CretaceouslTertiary boundary impact
hypothesis and the paleontological record. In Sharpton, V.L. and Ward, P.D., (eds.),
Global catastrophes in earth history, An interdisciplinary conference on impacts,
volcanism and mass mortality. Geological Society of America Special Paper,
247~563-575.
Klapper, G. 1988. The Montagne Noire Frasnian (Upper Devonian)
Conodont Succession. In McMillan, N.J., Embry, AS., and Glass, D.J., (eds.),
Devonian of the World, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the
Devonian Systern, Calgary, Canada. Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, pp.
449-468.
-*--O----- , and Foster, C.T. Jr. 1986. Quantification of outlines in Frasnian
(Upper Devonian) platforni conodonts. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences,
23:1214-1222.
----O.---- and ------ , C.T. Jr. 1993. Shape analysis of Frasnian species of the
late Devonian conodont genus Palmatolepis. Jouuml of Paleontology, 67(4)
Suppl. 2: 1-35.
---------- and Lane, H.R. 1988. Frasnian (Upper Devonian) Conodont
Sequence at Luscar Mountain and Mount Haultain, Alberta Rocky Mountains. In
McMillan, N.J., Embry, A.F., and Glass, D.J., (eds.), Devonian of the World,
Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the Devonian System,
Calgary, Canada. pp. 469-478.
____-___O_ , and Philip, G.M. 1971. Devonian conodont apparatuses and their
vicarious skeletal elements. Lethaia, 4: 429-452.
110
---me--e-- , Feist, R., Becker, R.T., and House, M.R. 1993. Definition of the
FrasniadFarnenn ian stage boundar Episodes l6:433-44 1 .
Klein, C. and Hurlbut, Jr., C. S. 1977. Manual of Mineralogy, John Wiley and
Sons, Inc., New York.
Lange, F.G. 1968. Conodonten-Gnippenfunde aus Kalken des tieferen
Oberdevon. Geologica et Palaeontologica, 2:37-57.
Lerbekmo, J.F. and St. Louis, R.M. 1 985. The terminal Cretaceous iridium
anomaly in the Red Deer Valley, Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth
Sciences, 23: 1 20- 1 24.
Lyell, C. 1830. Principles of Geology. Vol. 1. First Edition, John Murray,
London. (Facsimile reproduction of first edition, with an introduction by M. J.S.
Rudwick, 1990, Univeristy of Chicago Press, Chicago and London).
-------- . 1832. Principles of Geology. Vol. II. First Edition, John Murray,
London. (Facsimile reproduction of first edition, with an introduction by M.J.S.
Rudwick, 1 991 . Univeristy of Chicago Press, Chicago and London).
MacDonald, W.D. 1960. The Upper Devonian Kettle Point Formation of
Ontario. Canadian Mining and Metallurgical Bulletin, Canadian Inst. Mining and
Metallurgy, Trans., 63568-571.
1 1 1
Mayr, E. 1988. Toward a new Philosophy of Biology. Harvard University
Press, Cambridge. Massachusetts and London England.
McGhee, George R. Jr. 1996. The Late Devonian Mass Extinction
The FrasniadFarnennian Crisis. Columbia University Press, New York.
McLaren, D. J. 1 970. Time, life, and boundaries. Journal of Paleontology,
44:8Ol-815.
----------- . 1988. Detection and Significance of Mass Killings. In McMillan,
N.J., et al., (eds.), Devonian of the worîd, Canadian Society of Petroleurn Geologists
Memoir, 14: 1 -7.
- and Goodfellow, W.D. 1990. Geological and Biological Consequences
of Giant Impacts. Annual Review Earth Planetary Sciences, 18: 123-1 71.
Miall, Andrew D. 1984. Principles of Sedirnentary Basin Analysis. Springer-
Verlag, New York.
-------------- . 1997. The Geology of Stratigraphie Sequences. Springer-Verlag,
Berlin.
Miller, A.K., and Youngquist, W. 1947. Conodonts from the type section of the
Sweetland Creek Shale in Iowa. Journal of Paleontology, 21, 6:501-517.
112
Morrow, J. 2000. Shelf-to Basin Lithofacies and Conodont Paleoecology
across Frasnian-Famennian (F-F, mid-Late Devonian) Boundary, Central Great
Basin (Western U.S.A.). Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 219:l-57.
Muchez, Ph., Boulvain, R., Dreesen, R. and Hou, H.F. 1996. Sequence
stratigraphy of the Frasnian-Famennian transitional strata: a cornparison between
South China and southem Belgium. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology, 1 23:289-296.
Müller, K.J. and Müller, E.M. 1957. Early Upper Devonian (Independence)
conodonts from Iowa, Pt. 1 . Journal of Paleontology, 3l,6: 1069-1 1 08.
Müller, K.J. 1956. Zur Kenntnis der Conodonten-Fauna des europaischen
Devons, 1 ; Die Gattung Palmatolepis. Senckenbergische Naturforschende
Gesellschaft Abhandlungen, 494: 1 -70.
Murphy. A.E., Sageman, 5.8.. Hollands, D. J. 2000. Eutrophication by
decoupling of the marine biogeochernical cycles of C, N, and P: A mechanisrn for
the Late Devonian mass extinction. Geology, 28,5:427-430.
Newell, N.D., 1967. Revolutions in the History of Life. In Albritton, C. C. Jr.,
ed., Unifomity and Simplicity-A Symposium on the Principle of the Unifomity of
Nature. The Geological Society of America Special Paper, 89:63-91.
113
Nicoll, R.S. 1987. Fom and Function of the Pa element in the conodont
animal. In Aldridge, R. J. ed., Palaeobiology of Conodonts. British
Micropalaeontology Society Series. Halsted Press, New York.
Nonis, A.W. 1986. Review of Hudson Platforni Paleozoic Stratigraphy and
Biostratigraphy. In Martini, I.P. ed., Canadian lnland Seas, Elsevier, New York, pp.
1 7-42.
Norris, A.W., Uyeno, T.T., Sartenaer, P., and Telford, P.G. 1992. Brachiopod
and Conodont Faunas from the Uppemost Williams Island Fortnation type section
and Lower Long Rapids Formation (Middle and Upper Devonian), Moose River
Basin, Noithem Ontario. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 434: 1-1 33.
Orchard, M.J. 1988. Conodonts from the Frasnian-Famennian Boundary
Interval in Western Canada. In McMillan, N.J., Embry, A.F., and Glass, D.J., (eds.),
Devonian of the World, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the
Devonian System. Calgary, Canada, Candian Society of Petroleum Geologists. pp.
35-52.
Over, D. J. 1997. Conodont biostratigraphy of the Java Formation (Upper
Devonian) and the Frasnian-Famennian boundary in western New York State. In
Klapper, G., Murphy, M.A., and Talent, J.A., (eds.), Paleozoic Sequence
114
Stratigraphy, Biostratigraphy, and Biogeography: Studies in Honor of J. Granville
("Jess") Johnson: Boulder, Colorado, Geological Society of America Special Paper
321 :l6l-l77.
--------- , Conaway, Christin A., Katz, David J., Goodfellow, Wayne D., and
Gregoire, D. Conrad. 1997. Platinum group element (PGE) enrichments and
possible chondritic Ru :Ir across the Frasnian-Famennian boundary, western New
York State. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 132:399-410.
Paris, F., Girard, O., Feist, R. and Winchester-Seeto, T. 1996. Chitinozoan
bio-event in the Frasnian-Famennian boundary beds at La Serre (Montagne Noire,
Southem France). Palaeogepgraphy, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, 1221 : 1 31 -
145.
Pelzer, E.E. 1966. Mineralogy, Geochemistry and Stratigraphy of the Besa
River Shale, British Columbia. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 14,2:273-
321.
Puchkov, V.N., Klapper, G., and Mashkova, T.V. 1981. Natural assemblages
of Palmatolepis from the Upper Devonian of the northem Urals. Acta Paleontologica
Polonica 26 (34):281-298.
115
Purnell, M.A. 1995. Microwear on conodont elements and macrophagy in the
first vertebrates. Nature, 374:798-800.
-________________ and von Bitter, P.H. 1992. Blade-shaped conodont elements
functioned as cutting teeth. Nature, 359:629-620.
Qiang, J. 1989. On the Frasnian-Famennian Mass Extinction Event in South
China. Courier Forsch.-lnst.Senckenberg, 1 17:275-301.
Racki, G. 1998a. Frasnian-Famennian biotic crisis: undervafued tectonic
control? Palaeogeography , Palaeoclimatology , Palaeoecology , 141 : 1 77- 1 98.
-_-____.__-_ . 1988b. The F rasnian-Famennian biotic crisis; How many (if any)
bolide impacts? Geoi. Rundsch, 87:617-632.
Raup, David M. 1991. Extinction, Bad Genes or Bad Luck? W.W. Norton and
Co., New York.
Renaud, S. and Girard, C. 1999. Strategies of Survival to extreme
enviornmental perturbations: evolution of conodonts in response to the Kellwasser
crisis (Upper Devonian). Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology,
146: 19-32.
116
Ricken, W., 1991. Time span assessrnent - an overview. In Einsele, G.,
Ricken W., Seilacher A., (eds.), Cycles and events in stratigraphy. Springer-Verlag,
Berlin, Heidelberg, New York. pp. 773-794.
Russell, 0.3. 1985. Depositional analysis of a black shale using gamma-ray
stratigraphy: The Upper Devonian Kettle Point Formation of Ontario. Bulletin of the
Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, 33:236-253.
__---______ . 1993. Stratigraphy of the Kettle Point Formation (Upper Devonian of
southwestern Ontario, Canada); implications for depositional setting and resources
potential. In Roen, John B. and Kepferle, Roy C., (eds.), Petroleum geology of the
Devonian and Mississippian black shale of eastem North America. U.S. Geological
Survey Bulletin. pp. E 1 -E 1 1.
----------- and Baker, J.F. 1983. Stratigraphy and geochemistry of the Kettle
Point Formation, Ontario. In Eastern Oil Shale Symposium, November 13-1 6, 1983,
University of Kentucky, Institute for Mining and Minerals Research and the Kentucky
Energy Cabinet.
----------- and Telford, P.G. 1984. Geology of the Long Rapids Formation,
Moose River Basin, Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper 1 l9 : l l7 - l l8 .
117
Sandberg, C.A., 1976. Conodont biofacies of Late Devonian Polygnathus
styriacus Zone in western United States. In Bames, C.R., ed., Conodont
paleoecology: Geological Association of Canada Special Paper, 15: 1 71 -1 86.
------------ and Ziegler W. 1973. Refinement of Standard Upper Devonian
Conodont Zonation based on Sections in Nevada and West Gemany. Geologica et
Palaeontologica, 7:97- 1 22.
L__----__-__ , Ziegler. W., Leuteritz, K. and Brilll, S.M. 1978. Phylogeny,
speciation and zonation of Siphonodella (Conodonta, Upper Devonian and Lower
Carboniferous. Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 7, 2: 102-1 20.
--- and Dreesen, R. 1 984. Late Devonian icriodontid biofacies models
and altemate shallow-water conodont zonation. ln D.L. Clark, ed., Conodont
Biofacies and Provincialism. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 196: 143-
194.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ , Ziegler, W., Dreesen, R. and Butler, J.L. 1988. Late Frasnian mass
extinction: Conodont event stratigraphy, global changes and possible causes.
Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 102:263-307.
_-_-________ and Ziegler, W. 1996. Devonian conodont biochronology in geologic
time calibration. Senckenbergiana lethaea, 76:259-265.
----_-__-__- , Morrow, J.R., Warme, J.E. 1997. Late Devonian Alamo impact
Event, Global Kellwasser Events and Major Eustatic Events, Eastern Great Basin,
Nevada and Utah. Brigham Young University Geology Studies, 42(1): 129-1 60.
Sanderson, J.W., and Telford, P.G. 1985. The Onakawana B drill hole,
District of Cochrane, Ontario Geological Survey Miscellaneous Paper 126:165-166.
Sanford, B.V. 1987. Paleozoic Geology of the Hudson Platform. In
Beaumont, C., and Tankard, A.J. (eds.), Sedirnentary Basins and Basin-Forming
Mechanisms, Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, Memoir 12:483-505.
--O-------- and Norris, A.W. 1975. Devonian stratigraphy of the Hudson
Platforrn, Geological Survey of Canada Memoir 379, Department of Energy, Mines
and Resources.
Sannemann, D. 1955. Beitrag zur Untergliederung des Oberdevons nach
Conodonten. Neues Jahrbuch Geologie und Palaontologie Abhandlungen, 100,
3:324-331.
Savage, T.E. and Van Tuyl, F.M. 1919. Geology and stratigraphy of the area
of Paleozoic rocks in the vicinity of Hudson and James Bays. Bulletin of the
Geological Society of America, 30:339-377.
Sawlowics, 2. 1993. Iridium and other platinurn-group elements as
geochemical markers in sedimentary environments. Palaeogeography,
Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology. 1 04:253-270.
Schindler, E. 1990a. Die Kellwasser-Krise (hohe Frasne-Stufe, Ober-Devon).
Gottinger Arbeiten zur Geologie und Palaontologie, 46: 1 - 1 15.
--------------- . 1990b. The Late Frasnian (Upper Oevonian) Kellwasser Crisis, in
E.G. Kauffman and O.H. Walliser, (eds.), Extinction Events in Earth History, Lecture
Notes in Earth Sciences. Springer-Vedag, Berlin. 30:150-159.
--------O-œ---- . 1993. Event-stratigraphie marken within the Kellwasser Crisis
near the FrasniadFamennian boundary (Upper Devonian) in Gemany.
Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology 104: 1 1 5- 125.
--------------- and Konigshof, P. 1997. Sedimentology and microfacies of Late
Devonian Kellwasser Llmestones in relation to palaeobathymetry (Upper Kellwasser
Horizon, late Frasnian). Zbl. Geol. Palaont. Teil 1, H. 5/6:597-607.
_-O____-----_ , Schülke, 1. and Ziegler, W. 1998. The FrasnianIFamennian
boundary at the Sessacker Trench section near Oberscheld (Dill Syncline,
Rheinisches Schiefergebirge, Germany). Senckenbergiana lethaea, ï7 (1/2):243-
261.
120
Schülke, 1. 1 995. Evolutive Prozesse bei Palmatolepis in der frü hen Famenne-Stufe
(Conodonta, Ober-Devon). Gottinger Arbeiten zur Geologie and Palaontologie, 67: 1 -
108.
------------- . 1 998. Conodont community structure around the "Kellwasser mass
extinction event" (FrasnianFarnennian boundary inteival). Senckenbergiana
lethaea, 77 (1/2):87-99.
Scotese, C.R. and McKerrow W.S. 1990. Revised world maps and
introduction. In McKerrow, W.S. and Scotese, C. R., eds., Palaeozoic
palaeogepgraphy and biogeography: Geoiogical Society of London Memoir 12: 1-21 .
Seddon G. and Sweet W. C. 1971. An Ecologic Model for Conodonts. Journcl
of Paleontology, 45,5:869-880.
Sepkoski, J.J. Jr. 1986. Phanerozoic overview of mass extinction, in Raup,
D.M. and Jablonski, D., (eds.), Patterns and processes in the history of life.
Springer-Verlag, Berlin. pp. 277-295.
Sharpton, V.L. and Ward, P.D., eds. 1990. Global Catastrophes in Earth
History, Geological Society of America Special Paper 247: 1 -631 .
Stauffer. C. R. 1938. Conodonts of the Olentangy shale. Journal of
Paleontology, 12,5:411-433.
121
Sweet, W. C. 1 988. The Conodonta, Morphology, Taxonomy, Paleoecology,
and Evolutionary History of a Long-Extinct Animal Phylum. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
Tassy, P. 1993. The Message of Fossils. Trans. N. Hartman. McGraw Hill,
Inc., New York.
Telford, P.G. 1985. Biostratigraphy of the Long Rapids Formation (Upper
Devonian). Moose River Basin, Ontario (Abstract) Canadian Paleontology and
Biostratigraphy Seminar Program with Abstracts, J.F.Riva (ed.), page 16.
___-----_____ 3988. Devonian Stratigraphy of the Moose River Basin, James Bay
Lowland, Ontario, Canada. ln McMillan, N.J., Embry, A.F., and Glass, D.J., (eds.),
Devonian of the World, Proceedings of the Second International Symposium on the
Devonian System, Calgary, Canada, Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists, pp.
123-1 32.
Thompson, J. B. and Newton, C.R. 1988. Late Devonian Mass Extinction:
Episodic Climatic Cooling or Warming? In McMillan, N.J., Ernbry, A.F., Glass. D.J.,
(eds.), Devonian of the world, Vol. III, Canadian Society of Petroleum Geologists
Memoir, pp. 29-34.
122
Thurston, P.C., Williams, H.R., Sutcliffe, RH. and Stott, G.M. 1991. Geology
of Ontario. Ontario Geological Survey, Special Volume 4, Part 1 and 2, Maps and
Charts. Ministry of Northern Development and Mines.
Turekian, K.K. and Wedepohl, K.H. 1961. Distribution of the elements in
some major units of the Earth crust. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 72: 175-
192.
Ulrich, E.O. and Bassler, R.S. 1926. A classification of the toothlike fossils,
conodonts, with description of American Devonian and Mississippian specimens.
Proceedings of the US. National Museum, 68, art. 12: 1 -63.
Uyeno, T.T., Telford, P.G., and Sanford, B.V. 1982. Devonian conodonts and
stratigraphy of southwestern Ontario. Geological Survey of Canada Bulletin, 332:l-
45.
Walliser. O.H., Groos-Uffenorde, H., Schindler, E. and Ziegler, W. 1989. On
the Upper Kellwasser Horizon (Boundary FrasniadFamennian). Courier
Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 110:247-255.
Wang, K. and Bai, S. 1988. Faunal Changes and Events near the Frasnian-
Famennian Boundary of South China. In McMillan, N.J., Embry, A.F., and Glass,
D.J., (eds.). Devonian of the World, Proceedings of the Second International
Symposium on the Devonian System, Calgary, Canada, Candian Society of
Petroleum Geologists. pp. 71 -78.
O------- and Geldsetzer, H .H. J. 1 995. Late Devonian conodonts define the
precise horizon of the Frasnian-Famennian boundary at Cinquefoil Mountain,
Alberta, Canada. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences, 32: 1825-1 834.
--------- , Geldsetzer, H. H. J., Goodfellow, W. D. and Krouse, H. R. 1996.
Carbon and sulfur isotope anomalies across the Frasnian-Famennian extinction
boundary, Alberta, Canada. Geology, 24(2):187-191.
--------- , Orth, C.J., Attrep, M. Jr., Chatterton, B.D.E., Hou, H., and Geldsetzer,
H.H.J. 1991. Geochemical evidence for a catastrophic biotic event at the Frasnian
Famennian boundav in south China. Geology, 19:776-779.
Williams, H. R., Stott, G.M., Thurston, P.C., Sutcliffe, R.H., Bennett, G.,
Easton, R.M. and Armstrong, D.K., 1992. Tectonic Evolution of Ontario: Summary
and Synthesis. In Thurston P.C., Williams, H.R., Sutcliffe, RH., and Stott, G.M.,
(eds.), Geology of Ontario, pp. 1 255- 1 332.
Winder, C.G., 1966. Conodont Zones and Stratigraphic Variability in Upper
Devonian rocks, Ontario. Journal of Paleontology, 40: 1275- 1 293.
124
--------O- , Bames, C. R., Telford, P.G. and Uyeno, T.T. 1 975. Ordovician to
Devonian stratigraph y and conodont biostratigraphy of southem Ontario. Geological
Assocation of Canada-Mineralogical Association of Canada-Geological Society of
America, Field Excursions 4 to 7 Guidebook, pp 1 19-1 60.
Yan-Zheng, Hou-Hong-Fei and Ye-Lian-Fang. 1993. Carbon and oxygen
isotope event markers near the Frasnian- Famennian boundary, Luoxiu section,
South China. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, lO4(l4):9%IO4.
Youngquist, W.L. 1945. Upper Devonian conodonts from the lndependence
(?) shale of Iowa. Journal of Palaeontology, l9,4:355-367.
Ziegler, W., ed. 1973-81. Catalogue of Conodonts, v. 1-5. E.
Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
Ziegler, W. and Sandberg, C.A. 1984. Palmatolepis-based revision of upper
part of standard Late Devonian conodont zonation. ln DL. Clark, ed., Conodont
Biofacies and Provincialism. Geological Society of America Special Paper, 1%: 179-
1 94.
-_____________-_--_-___________________________--____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ . 1990. The Late Devonian standard conodont zonation.
Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 121 :1-115.
1 S5
-------a-----œ------------- . 1994. Conodont Phylogenetic-Zone Concept.
Newsletters on Stratigraphy, 30: 105-1 23.
------------------o.-------- . 1996. Reflexions on Frasnian and Famennian Stage
boundary decisions as a guide to future deliberations. Newsletters on Stratigraphy,
33 (3): 1 57-1 80.
Plate 1 Al1 upper views except fig. 16 which is a lateral view. All Pa eiements except figs. 2, 9, 19 which are Pb elements
1.2. Palmatolepis delicatula delicatula, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 25, ROM #54107,54108, x100.
3. Palmatolepis ederi, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20, ROM #54109, x70
4. Palmatolepis foliacea, Williams Island Formation type section, Sample 2, ROM #541 10, x6O
5. Palmatolepis foliacea, Williams Island Formation type section,Sample 1, ROM #54111, x80
6. Palmatolepis gigas gigas, Williams Island Formation type section, Sample 5, ROM #54112, x 70
7. Palmatolepis hassi, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 17, ROM #54113, x80
8. Palmatolepis hassi, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20, ROM #54114, x60
9. Palmatolepis hassi, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20, ROM #54115, x130
10. Palmatolepis jamieae, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20, ROM #54116, x 80
1 1. Palmatolepis juntianensis, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20, ROM #54 1 1 7, x120
12. Palmatolepis linguiformis, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20, ROM #54118, x60
13. Palmatalepis minuta minuta, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 25, ROM #54119, x170
14. Palmatolepis plana, Williams Island Formation type section, Sample 1, ROM #5412O, x60
15, 1 6. Palmatolepis praetriangularis, Long Rapids Formation type section,Sample 20, ROM #54121, #15 x100; #16 x i 10.
17,18. Palrnatolepis praetriangularis, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20, ROM #54122,54123, x100
19. Palmatolepis praetriangularis, Williams Island Formation type section, Sample 5, ROM #Wl24, x110
Plate 2 All upper views except fig. 4 which is a lower view and figs. 12, 14, 16 which are lateral views. All Pa elements except figs. 6, 10, 17 which are Pb elements.
1. Palmatolepis protohomboidea, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 25, ROM #54125, x170
2. Palmatolepis rhenana nasuta, Williams Island Formation type section, Sample 4 ROM #54126, x60
3. Palmatolepis rhenana rhenana, Williams Island Formation type section, Sample 4 ROM #54127, x80
4,s. Palrnatolepis rotunda, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sarnple 20 ROM #54128,54129, #4 x80; # 5 x100
6. Palmatolepis rotunda, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20 ROM #Ml 30, x120
7. Palmatolepis cf. Pa. semichatovae, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 25, ROM #54131. x110
8, 9. Palmatolepis subrecta, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sarnple 20 ROM #Ml 32,54133, #8 x70, #9 x80
10. Palmatolepis subrecta, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20 ROM #54134, x70.
1 1, 12. Palmatolepis triangularis, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 25, ROM #54135, #11 x100, #12 x100
13, 14. Palmatolepis triangularis, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 25, ROM #!XI 36, #13 x80, #14 x80
1 5, 16. Palrnatolepis triangularis, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 25, ROM #54137, #15 x60, #16 x60
17. Palmatolepis triangular~s, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 25, ROM #54138, x110
18. Palmatolepis ? Mutant element, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20, ROM #54139, x120
Plate 3 All upper views except figs. 15-1 9 which have no standard orientation
1. Ancyrodella buckeyensis, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20 ROM #54140, x8O
2. Ancyrodella curvata, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20 ROM #54141, x100
3. Ancyrodella nodosa, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20 ROM #54142, x100
4. Ancyrognathus asymmetricus, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 17 ROM #54143, x60.
5. Ancyrognathus calvini, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20 ROM #54144, x80
6.Ancyrognathus triangularis, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 8 ROM #54145, x130.
7. Ancyrognathus ubiquitus, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20 ROM #54146, x100
8. Icriodus alternatus alternatus, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sampling 20 ROM #54147, x100
9. lcriodus syrnmetricus, Williams Island Formation type section, Sample 3 ROM #54148, xl00.
10. Polygnathus brevalaminus, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 25 ROM #54149, x110
1 1. Polygnathus decorosus, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20 ROM #54150, x70
12. Polygnathus elegantulus, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 22 ROM #54151, x110
13. Polygnathus evidens, Williams Island Formation type section, Sample 5 ROM #54152, x60
14. Polygnathus webbi, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 22 ROM #S4l53, x100
15, 16. Conodont pearls, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20 ROM #54154,54155, #15 x300 #16 x220
17, 18, 19. Conodont pearls, Long Rapids Formation type section, Sample 20 ROM #54156, 541 57, #17 x220, #18 x200, #19 x500
Table 1 Selective Geochemical Sampling
of Long Rapids Formation type section
CaO Si02 Mgû , A1203 Fe203 Mn0 K20 Ti02 , Na20 P205 LOI TOTAL Ba , Sr Y Sc Zr Be V , , . . .
Sample 28
Sample 27
Sample 26
Sample 18
Sample 16
Sample 14
Sample 13
Sample 12
Sample 11 21.71, 16.98 14.29 4.53 3.82 0.18 1.14 0.24 0.1 0.07 33.82 96.86 113 43 34 5 58 -1 35 . . . , . .
Sample 10 22.41, 16.63 14.72, 4.66 3.63 0.19 1.21 0.24 0.09 0.06 34.67 98.51 118 45 35 6 54 -1 36 , , . , , ,
Sample 9 , 22.62, 16.93 14.84, 4.62 2.91 0.18 1.24 0.24 0.08 0.13, 34.98 98.77 120, 48 . 34 . 6 . 63 - 1 . 32
Sample 8 22.16, 18.03 14.48 4.49 3,05 0.17 1.32 0.26 0.08 0.14 34.37 98.56 124 .48 . , . 30 6 68 -1 30 . .
Sample 7 , 20.58, 21.72 13.42, 5.46 2.47 0.14. 1.56 0.3 0.08 0.04 32.76 98.53 147, 50 , 28 , 6 , 78 -1, 36
Sample 4 21.88 14.41 11.96 4.48 8.44 0.17 1.17 0.22 0.09 0.04 26.73 89.59 130 67 34 7 48 -1 33
Activation Laboratories minus sign (-) = less than (<)
-" t -" I - . L.. , - . -1
d -- . -Lir( . -.L.
air.-.. i i -ci.
I i -.-" ' 0 L I
. a , I -Li. 0 , u n 0 b W....
I I Li.,
. b - L m O , -.. i 1 r...,
I I -ci. I I - L W
., -6.. S I .-
., .CW
41 CC" I 1 -Li.
C D b 1 1 I i 1 r r 1 E I L o r ~ m r l r c i ~ L L I L C L U H ~ J 1 1 c 1 i m i O e r mc oc 1 cm 1 cm 1 o r 1 I O II I --- I I I 1 1 ~ l d l . , U ~
'III Il .- - -- I I I G nw1iu.w
el<, il I -- 1 I l II II
<I il II 1 I i # k l 1 # I L 1 # l - ,- a, **I,l,.,-~
l II C l --- ,- 1 " C I V i V I (, OI'1UI.W
'l'Il -- I I l I 1 1 I l I
- tiiuiurl: U I i O 1 1 1 " I I ; '7; 1 1 e s(<si- 011 <J I I I 1 1 1 8 cl V I I o r l a u i m ~ 1 <1 < l 1: 1; 2. -- ,-, I>L I~lllll'.Li
W I II 1; r. ' 3 / II I L 1 l O(LIIIIY~
- - -- l ' 1: 9 -T
l - - - . . . - - - - - - - . - . .
e i u l a u i ~ G
Il/ U 1 - 6 C l ~ l < l l I l W H
I O II 1 1 t I . L "I<1iiWti
r i 1: 1 , " 1 I i ( i IU i .~
UR2 - N 1
Table 4 Whole Rock Analysis of Boundary Strata
302 , A1203
?O, O10
Sampfe 25-3 52.23 13.01
Sarnple 25-2 52.19, 13.53
Sample 25-1 , 51.19 13.10
Sample 24 57.41. 14.79
Sample 23-6 52.20, 12.98
Sample 23-5 51.13, 13.43
Sample 23-4 51.68 13.39
Sample 23-3 53.02, 13.43
Sample 23-2 51 .91 13.16
Sample 23- 1 50.92. 12.74
Sample 22 38.67, 9.64
Sample 2 1-4 46.49, 11.87
Sample 21-3 44.75, 11.30
Sample 2 1 -2 45.82 10.82
Sample 21-1 44.66, 10.71
Sample 20-6 43.02, 10.52
Sample 20-5 , 44.19, 10.71
Sample 20-4 43.47, 10.74
Sample 20-3 43.44, 10.78
Sample 20-2 . 41.11, 10.47
Sample 20- t 37.69, 9.86
Sample 19 58.07, 14.27
Sample 18 29.42, 7.39
Sample 17 56.90, 13.69
Sample 16 30.68, 7.75
Sample 15 55.86 13.8;
N e g a l ~ e values indicaie los8 lhan the <leleclion Iimil LOI values lese than OOl?'. repiesenl a Gain on Igniiioii
P205, LOI,
O10 , % ,
0.08, 14.37 ,
0.10 17.21.
0.17, 16.91,
0.06, 10.86,
0.09, 17.00,
0.09, 17.89,
0.08 17.72,
0.09, 17.59,
0.09 17.51
0.09 17.89,
0.06, 22.35.
0.08, 20.44,
0.10. 22.47,
0.10. 20.94.
0.12, 21.33,
0.35, 22.70,
0.23, 22.18,
0.27, 21.90,
0.31, 21.81,
0.31, 22.83,
0.37, 22.48.
0.09, 11.12,
0.07, 27.58,
0.10, 12,lO.
0.08, 26.85,
TOTAL ,
?'O,
98.09,
98.68,
99.29,
100.24,
98.90.
98.67,
99.25,
100.85,
98.77,
100.1 1 ,
98.55,
99.74,
99.89,
99.58
98.77,
98.61 ,
98.83,
98.61,
98.92,
98.79.
98.7 1.
100.72,
98.92,
99.75,
98.87,
4.36 0.07 4.38 4.17 0.20 3.77 0.838 0.19 12.33 99.98 395 70 37 14 232 2 1141
C
Activalion Laboralories W b\
Table 5 Trace Element Analysis of
Boundary Strata
Snmple 25.3
Snmple 25.2
Ssmpls 25.1
hmpls 24
Srrnple 23.6
Sampla 234
Çample 23.4
Sarnpla 23 3
Sampls 23.2
Sainpla 23.1
Sampk 22
Ssmpls 21-4
Simple 21,3
Sampla 21.2
Sampls 21.1
Sampla 20.6
Simple 20 5
Sampls 20,4
S~mpla 10.3
Sirnpla 20.2
Simple 20.1
Sarnpk 19
s m p b re
Samplr 17
Sunple 16
S m d e 15
3
NI, AO. AS, R1i, B R , CA CO, C11, CS, FE , IIF 110, 111, MO, NA, NI, AB, SB, SC S E , SN, Sn, H, ni, U , W , ZN, L A , CE, NO, SM, EU, 10, YB, LU,Msu
PPO, PPM, PPM, PI%, PPM, .. , PI'M PPM, PPM, a. t'PM l'PM, PPO, P m , h , PFM, PFM, t'PM, PPM PPM, .. *. , PPM f3PM, PPM, PPM, PIW, PPM, ['PM. Pm, PPM, PPM. PPM, PPM PI'M, 9
16. 12, 145.
15, 123. 161,
22, 133, 164,
.05, 1 1 1 , 106,
05, 118, 14,
0 5 , 123 138
11, 122, 127,
13, 1 1 1 , 1 1 8.
-05, 112 132
OS, 1 1 1, 129,
05, 98, 8,
10 107, 1 1 1 ,
05. U2. 89.
15, 9 2 , 88.
15, 8 8 R B ,
13 , 00, 8 7 ,
.O!+, 10 1 , 86,
05, 04, 7 1
05. 97, 91,
0 6 . 104. 85,
05. 10 12,
-05, 1 1 3, 08,
0 5 , 81, 43,
17, 1 1 4, 5 2 ,
05, 6 5 . 3,
8, 18, 30, 05, 8646
4, 1 , 35, 046, 9
2, 12, 38, 048, 9262
3, OB, 38, 045, 8757
5 1 , 3, 0 % . 8778
Activation Laboratories minus (-) = less han (<)
Table 7 Iridium Content
Sample 25-3
Sample 25-2
Sample 25-1
Sample 24
3ample 23-6
;ample 23-5
:ample 23-4
:ample 23-3
:ample 23-2
$ample 23-1
$ample 22
;ample 21-4
;ample 21-3
;ample 21-2
iample 21-1
;ample 20-6
;ample 20-5
;ample 20-4
;ample 20-3
;ample 20-2
;ample 20-1
;ample 19
;ample 18
;ample 17
,ample 16
IR
PPB
0.9
O .2
0.2
0.1
0.2
0.3
1.3
1.1
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.3
0.2
0.4
0.7
0.6
4
Activation Laboratories