48
The Federal Judiciary

The Federal Judiciary

  • Upload
    chelsey

  • View
    57

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Federal Judiciary. The Federal Judiciary. There is hardly a political question in the United States which does not sooner or later turn into a judicial one Alexis de Tocqueville. The Federal Judiciary. Why are our courts so influential? Judicial Review - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 2: The Federal Judiciary

The Federal Judiciary

• There is hardly a political question in the United States which does not sooner or later turn into a judicial one

•Alexis de Tocqueville

Page 3: The Federal Judiciary

The Federal Judiciary

•Why are our courts so influential?• Judicial Review–The power of the courts to declare

state or federal laws in violation of the Constitution

Page 4: The Federal Judiciary

The Federal Judiciary

• Read Article III of the Constitution• Who creates the “inferior courts” below the Supreme

Court?• What is the term of office for federal judges? • Under what conditions do they remain in office?• What are the constitutional qualifications to become a

federal judge?• Which cases go straight to the Supreme Court (Original

Jurisdiction)?• What crime is defined in Article III?

Page 5: The Federal Judiciary

Hamilton in Federalist 78

• The least dangerous of the three branches

• The judiciary, on the contrary, has no influence over either the sword or the purse

• The interpretation of the laws is the proper and peculiar province of the courts

Page 6: The Federal Judiciary

The Judiciary Act (1789)

• Created our current 3-tiered structure of the federal courts

• The Supreme Court• Circuit Courts (aka Courts of Appeal)

• District Courts

Page 7: The Federal Judiciary

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

• Chief Justice John Marshall wrote the 5-0 decision declaring a portion of the Judiciary Act in violation of the Constitution

• Established the courts as the interpreters of the law (JUDICIAL REVIEW)

• Was not used again until Scott v. Sanford in 1857 – The Dred Scott Decision

Page 8: The Federal Judiciary

Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint

• Critics of judicial review say judges sometimes make decisions reflecting their own policy preferences

• This is called JUDICIAL ACTIVISM• They believe that judges should always look to

the “original intent” of the founders when making decisions – A strict construction of the Constitution

• This is called JUDICIAL RESTRAINT

Page 9: The Federal Judiciary

Judicial Activism vs. Judicial Restraint

• Others argue that the founders purposely were vague in their wording

• They did not have a single common intent and even if they did we should not be bound by it

• The world has changed in ways the founders could not have envisioned

• The Constitution should change to meet changing times (a “living” constitution)

Page 10: The Federal Judiciary

The U.S. District Courts

Page 11: The Federal Judiciary

U.S. District Courts

Page 12: The Federal Judiciary

U.S. District Courts

• Each state has at least 1; 4 in Texas• The basic trial courts in the federal system (with

juries)• Civil Cases– Lawsuits, one person sues another or an organization

• Criminal Cases– The government prosecutes someone for violating a

federal criminal statute (law)– ***Only about 10% of criminal cases (most are in state

courts)

Page 13: The Federal Judiciary

U.S. District Courts

• Within the Justice Department a U.S. Attorney is the chief federal prosecutor in each of the 94 districts

• Appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate (majority vote)

• Plaintiff – in civil cases, the party initiating the lawsuit; in criminal cases, the accuser

• Defendant – in civil cases, the person having the lawsuit brought against them; in criminal cases, the accused

Page 14: The Federal Judiciary

Burden of Proof

• In a civil case, the plaintiff is required to prove “a preponderance of the evidence” in their favor (the needle tilts in their direction)

• In a criminal case, the burden is much higher• “Beyond a reasonable doubt”– Does not mean no doubt whatsoever– Convinced the defendant is guilty (not necessarily

100%)– If not convinced, reasonable doubt exists

Page 15: The Federal Judiciary

The Circuit Courts (The Courts of Appeal)

• There are 12 regions, each served by a circuit court• There is a 13th Court of Appeal for the Federal

Circuit located in Washington, D.C.• Each court has a panel of judges the preside over

cases (no juries)• Has appellate jurisdiction• The vast majority of federal cases end in one of

the circuit courts and do NOT make it to the Supreme Court

Page 16: The Federal Judiciary

The Circuit Courts

Page 17: The Federal Judiciary
Page 19: The Federal Judiciary

The Supreme Court

• Congress establishes the size of the court which is currently 9 (since 1869)

• Judges on the Supreme Court are called JUSTICES

• One Chief Justice • 8 Associate Justices

Page 20: The Federal Judiciary

Chief Justice John Roberts Appointed by

President George W. Bush

2005 At age 50 Harvard Law

School 78-22

Page 21: The Federal Judiciary

Antonin Scalia Appointed by

President Ronald Reagan

1986 At age 50 Harvard Law

School 98-0

Page 22: The Federal Judiciary

Anthony Kennedy Appointed by

President Reagan

1988 At age 52 Harvard Law

School 97-0

Page 23: The Federal Judiciary

Clarence Thomas Appointed by

President George H.W. Bush

1991 At age 43 Yale Law

School 52-48

Page 24: The Federal Judiciary

The Thomas Hearings A former associate and Oklahoma

law professor, Anita Hill, accused Thomas of sexual harassment

An all-male Senate Judiciary Committee clumsily dealt with the issues

Thomas was confirmed 52-48

Page 25: The Federal Judiciary
Page 26: The Federal Judiciary

Ruth Bader Ginsberg Appointed by

President Clinton

1993 At age 60 Columbia Law 97-3

Page 27: The Federal Judiciary

Stephen Breyer Appointed by

President Clinton

1994 At age 56 Harvard Law

School 87-9

Page 28: The Federal Judiciary

Samuel A. Alito Jr. Appointed by

President George W. Bush

2006 At age 55 Yale Law School 58-42

Page 29: The Federal Judiciary

Sonia Sotomayor Appointed by

President Obama

2009 At age 55 Yale Law School 68-31

Page 30: The Federal Judiciary

Elena Kagan Appointed by

President Obama 2010 At age 50 Harvard Law

School 63-37

Page 31: The Federal Judiciary

The Supreme Court It is the court of LAST RESORT Has final say on questions concerning the

meaning of the Constitution Mostly Appellate Jurisdiction (from State

Supreme Courts and the Circuit Courts) Original Jurisdiction

• Cases involving a State• Cases dealing with

ambassadors/diplomats

Page 32: The Federal Judiciary

The Supreme Court Supreme Court decisions carry the

weight of law Only 2 ways to reverse/change a

Supreme Court decision• Add an amendment to the Constitution• The Supreme Court issues a different

decision in a later case (Plessy v. Ferguson (1896)…Brown v. Board of Education (1954))

Page 33: The Federal Judiciary

How Cases Reach the Court 10,000 cases a year appealed to the

Court The Court only decides about 75-80

cases a year The Rule of Four

• 4 of the 9 Justices must agree in order to accept an appeal

Page 34: The Federal Judiciary

How Cases Reach the Court The Writ of Certiorari (Cert.)

• Sersh-uh-rare-ee• An order from the Supreme Court to a

lower court to send up the records in a particular case so the Court can review it

• To appeal a case to the Court, a plaintiff or defendant must apply for a writ of certiorari

The court “grants cert.” or “denies cert.”

Page 35: The Federal Judiciary

How the Court Operates First Monday in October through June

or July They consider cases in two week

cycles (2 weeks of listening to arguments, followed by a period where they make decisions)

Page 36: The Federal Judiciary

How the Court Operates Briefs – Written documents filed with

the court before the oral arguments begin (Plaintiff and Defendant lawyers)

Put forth the written arguments of both sides in the case

Page 37: The Federal Judiciary

How the Court Operates Amicus Curiae Briefs Translates to “Friend of the Court” ***Briefs written by interested parties

that are NOT directly part of the case The Court requests them or approves

them Example – NRA files a brief in a case

dealing with gun control laws

Page 38: The Federal Judiciary

How the Court Operates Lawyers provide ORAL ARGUMENTS 30 minute presentations to the 9

Justices Stand at a podium White light after 25 minutes Red light after 30 Justices often interrupt with

questions of their own

Page 39: The Federal Judiciary
Page 40: The Federal Judiciary
Page 41: The Federal Judiciary

The Solicitor GeneralPart of the Justice DepartmentRepresents the U.S. Government

if involved in a Supreme Court case

Determines the government’s argument as well as what cases to appeal to the Court

Page 42: The Federal Judiciary

Solicitor General Donald Verrilli

(replaced Elena Kagan after she was nominated to the Supreme Court)

Page 43: The Federal Judiciary

Discussing Oral Arguments and Briefs Done privately by the 9 Justices Chief Justice presides and speaks

first Each Associate summarizes their

views in order of seniority Then debate begins 1/3 of all decisions are unanimous 8-1, 7-2, 6-3, 5-4

Page 44: The Federal Judiciary

Opinions

Majority OpinionConcurring Opinion

Dissenting Opinion

Page 45: The Federal Judiciary

Majority Opinion Written reasoning explaining why the

majority ruled the way that they did Chief Justice determines who will

write this if part of the majority

Page 46: The Federal Judiciary

Concurring Opinion When a member of the majority

disagrees with the majority opinion A different opinion giving an

alternative line of reasoning

Page 47: The Federal Judiciary

Dissenting Opinion Written to express the views of the

minority in a case Dissenting opinions can later become

the view of the majority (when a decision is reversed at a later date)

Page 48: The Federal Judiciary

Relevant Vocab Senatorial Courtesy

• When a vacancy opens on a federal court, The President consults the senators from the state where the vacancy occurs

Stare Decisis • Latin for “to stand by things decided”• The Court’s tendency to respect and

adhere to precedent (previous decisions)• Let the lower court decision stand