68
Philip Martin: [email protected] The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox

The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    2

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Philip Martin: [email protected]

The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox

Page 2: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Highlights 1

• Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in

2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

ag

• Hired crop workers = 70% Mexican-born; 50% not

authorized; from 30% newcomers in 2000 to 2%

• Employer responses: 4 S’s– Satisfy: bonuses, train supers. If supply US workers

inelastic, wage increases do not = more US workers

– Stretch: mechanical aids to make work easier for older

workers & women (conveyor belts; dwarf trees)

– Substitution: labor-saving mechanization (& switch crops)

– Supplement: H-2A workers = fresh blood, but must (1) try to

recruit US, (2) provide housing, (3) pay AEWR

– Race in the fields: imports, machines, & guest workers

Page 3: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal
Page 4: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Highlights 2

• Share of employment in ag decreases as per

capita income increases

• Within ag, share of hired workers rises because

operator and unpaid family decline fastest

• Hired can be more vulnerable: domestic workers

who cannot escape farm work, unauthorized

foreigners, and guest workers

• Responses:

– Self-help bottom-up unions fail because best workers

get out of ag 1st

– Top-down NGO-buyer agreements, CIW, Fair Trade,

EFI: need subsidies, no employer or worker input

– Government: hold down labor costs for small farms &

provide special ed, health, housing services (US $1

bil)

Page 5: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Highlights 3

• What should be done? Anticipate inevitable

change & implement consistent policies

– Treat factories in the fields as nonfarm employers,

end ag exceptionalism in labor, migration, taxes etc, esp

for large farms

– Freer trade: import Mexican tomatoes, not Mexican

tomato pickers?

– Which subsidies? labor-saving mechanization OR

housing & other services to keep workers in ag

– How to help farm workers make the farm-nonfarm

transition: educate children

– Best way to help a farm worker increase his/her

income? Help them to out of ag. Help children—prepare

for nonfarm.

Page 6: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Share of labor in ag (orange) & GDP from ag (green) fall as

per capita income rises (X-axis); gradual China, sharp Brazil & Nigeria

Page 7: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Share of hired workers (orange line) rises with per

capita income (X-axis). Exceptions ex-USSR

Page 8: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Generally rising share of hired worker over time

Ag exporters have higher shares of hired workers

Page 9: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

US FVH ag: 15% of farm sales, 2/3 of farm labor costs

Page 10: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

US agriculture: Sales, Labor’s Share, Seasonality

• Farm sales = 54% crops, 46% livestock ($395 bil)

– FVH: $57 billion, or 27% of $212 billion crops

– FVH commodities = 80% of QCEW direct-hire

employment & wages paid

– CA, FL: states where FVH = 90% of crop sales

• FVH: labor’s share: average 30% of

production costs, but wide range, wine

grapes (<10%) to berries (50%)

• Seasonality: Peak-trough ratio = 1.4 million

workers in July, 1 million in January

– Ratio rises as geography down; can be 100 to 1 on a

farm

– CA: 2 workers per full-time equivalent job

Page 11: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

3 C’s of FVH farm labor market

• Concentration: Production & employment are

concentrated. Largest 10 FVH farms = 50% prod

• Contractors & intermediaries: Win-win

specialization OR risk-absorbers for violations?

• Conflict: Exit versus voice: easier to exit a

“bad” job (ag & fast food) than to organize &

voice demands to raise wages

– Exit of “best” workers = hard to sustain bottom-up

unions in ag & fast food

– Top-down unions: no locals & local leaders (UFW)

– Top-down worker centers & Fair Trade: NGO-buyer

agreement, employer decides, no worker votes

– Revolving door labor market: employers rely on

newcomers to replace quits

Page 12: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

2007-16: US QCEW average emp up 8%, CA 10%, WA 24%

Page 13: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Since 2009: more workers are brought to CA crop farms by nonfarm

employers than are hired directly by crop farms

Page 14: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Same trend in US, but still almost 2 direct hires for each support hire

Page 15: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

CA: average emp (blue) and unique workers (red) up 10%

0

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

800,000

900,000

2007 2012 2015

Average FTE Employment and Unique Farm Workers: 2007, 2012, 2015

FTE Employment

Workers

Page 16: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Who pays farm wages? QCEW 2016: $42 billion. Big 5 = 2/3

Crop support: 24%; fruit 13%; green 11%; dairy 8%; veg 8%

Page 17: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

3,000 US FLCs;

1,400 in CA

FLCs: Increase

efficiency of

worker-job

matching OR act

as risk absorbers?

Page 18: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

FLC crews: harvest tree fruits

Hard to monitor workers in trees = piece rates

Page 19: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

CA strawberries #1 ag employer: 90% of US 3 billion

pounds (1.5 million tons) from 35,000 acres, 60,000

to 70,000 workers. Piece rates of $1.75-$2/tray

Page 20: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Vegetables: direct-hire

& workers via crop

support firms

(partners)

Page 21: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Nursery & dairy

Big 5 of 20 pay

64% of US farm

wages; 82% of CA

farm wages

Page 22: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

5 of 20+ NAICS ag codes account for most US farm wages

Page 23: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Hired Crop Workers: NAWS

• 70% born in Mexico: 70% of foreign-born = unauthorized, so 50% of total unauthorized

• Almost no newcomers (in US less than 1 year). Average age of crop workers = 39 (NAWS)

• Settled families with US-born children: – Follow-the-crop migration <5%

– 55% of families get some means-tested benefits

• Workers: $11/hour; Employers $12/hour

• Average earnings: $17,500-$20,000/year; $100 a day for 200 days of work a year

• Farm work like nonfarm work: live off the farm, commute to work, have 1 farm employer during year

Page 24: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

White student farm workers (1970s); Mexicans

Page 25: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Agriculture: feel effects of

fewer unauthorized

newcomers since 2008-09

Page 26: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Unauthorized newcomers down: FWs settled & less mobile

Page 27: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Employers: 4-S responses to fewer newcomers

• Satisfy current farm workers: bonuses, benefits, & supervisor training to retain. If supply of US workers = inelastic, wage increases do not add to supply

• Stretch with mechanical aids that increase productivity: conveyor belts in fields, dwarf trees. How much to invest, how fast to deploy?

• Substitute: labor-saving mechanization. Will wages keep rising to justify investments in dwarf & machines? What priorities for seed companies? (Switch crops?)

• Supplement the with H-2A guest workers. Will Congress end recruitment, housing, & AEWR? Allow H-2A workers in dairy & other year-round jobs? From 10-month to 3-year visas & Asians?

• What balance between mechaniza, migs,

Page 28: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Satisfy: bonuses, benefits, supervisor training & respect

RETAIN but not ENLARGE ag workforce

Page 29: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Stretch: mechanical aids raise worker productivity

Page 30: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Conveyor belts in fields reduce worker walking

Page 31: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Thinning and harvesting apples from platforms

Culture change: do

platform workers want to

share piece rate wages?

Sweet tango apples

Dwarf trees & no ladders

Page 32: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Substitute: mechanize olives, carrots, tomatoes, nursery

Page 33: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Mechanization

Page 34: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

LA Times: July 21, 2017: weeding, easy tech & big market

Page 35: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Agrobot: crop-specific machines. Tough tech, small market

Page 36: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Machines or people to pick strawberries?

Consumers: add machine & hand pick to convent & organic?

Page 37: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Robots in defense vs ag: performance vs costs

Page 38: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Supplement with H-2As: 75,000 FY07, 243,000 FY18

Top 5 states: GA, FL, WA, NC, CA: 52% of H-2A jobs certified

Page 39: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Most H-2A workers are younger than 35

Page 40: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Most FVH ag in metro counties: high housing costs

Page 41: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

40th percentile fair market rent Monterey 2017: $1,400 for 2-

bedrooms. Earn $12/hour, 160 hours/month = $1,920/month

Page 42: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Housing: T&A $17 mil, 800 beds, $21,000/bed

Return to Bracero-era on-farm housing?

T&A: built for H-

2A guest

workers, but

houses mostly

local workers.

Some local

workers resent

H-2As with free

housing &

transportation

Page 43: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

T&A: $125/month/person

Will other Salinas farms

build housing? Housing for

local or H-2A workers?

Page 44: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

AgJOBS: repeat IRCA with changes

1. Legalize unauthorized: 3-5 years more farm work to

become immigrants (with families)

2. Easy access to guest workers

• W-3: tied to employers, max 3-year contracts

• W-4: free agent workers who cannot be U >60 days

• Housing allowance to both W-3 & W-4 OK; No SS, UI

Page 45: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Goodlatte: 450,000 H-2C visas (40,000 for meatpacking)

1. 24-month visas for seasonal or year-round jobs

2. Employers attest & post jobs; pay 115% of min wage

3. No transportation or housing for H-2Cs required

Page 46: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

CA: 50% increase in minimum wage by 2022 (now $12)

Page 47: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

US food system: 21 million jobs; 18 million are nonfarm

Page 48: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Where were these photos taken?

Page 49: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal
Page 50: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

US ag trade: deficit with Mexico since 2014

Page 51: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Big 3 Mex X: tomatoes, avocados,

berries

Big 3 = half $11 billion of US F&V

imports from Mexico

Page 52: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Big 3 US farm exports to

Mexico

Corn, grain, meat

Page 53: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Avocados & tomatoes (blue) lead Mexican ag exports

Red fruit = raspberries & blackberries; red veg = peppers

Page 54: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Most Mexican exports complement US production

Mexican imports peak in winter months

Page 55: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Share of imports in US consumption = 86% of avocados, 74% of

cucumbers, 60% of bell peppers, 57% of tomatoes, 48% of raspberries

Page 56: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Mexico: 25% of global tomato exports.

Mexican Pres Salinas in 1990: Mexico can

export tomatoes or tomato pickers to US

Page 57: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Summary 1 • Farm labor prosperity paradox: employment in ag

down as per capita income up; hired do more of the farm work; hired are more vulnerable

• Farm workers persist: employ expansion offsets mechanization, but workers age, settle, less migrant

• Employer responses

– Satisfy current workers to retain

– Stretch with labor-stretching mechanical aids

– Substitute: labor-saving mechanization (switch)

– Supplement: H-2A workers; reduce recruitment, housing, & AEWR requirements

• Race between machines, guest workers & imports: where to invest?

Page 58: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Summary 2 • Short-term responses: satisfy, stretch, and

supplement. What model for H-2A?– NC & WA: associations recruit H-2A workers

– FL & CA: super FLCs move H-2A workers farm to farm

– Most H-2As: direct hire & employer-provided housing

• Medium-term responses: substitute, supplement, and imports– How fast do machine costs fall & performance improve?

What farm mgt changes: (1) new plantings tailored to machines? (2) lower pack out rates?

– Build housing for H-2A workers or end housing requirement? Invest to assure workers when needed or assume floating workers available?

– Imports: US ag trade, $140 bil X, $100 bil M; imports of FVH commodities rising—ag trade deficit with Mexico

Page 59: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

https://giannini.ucop.edu/publications/cal-ag-book/

http: migration.ucdavis.edu

Page 60: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

October 2018 Honduran caravan: bolster support for wall?

Page 61: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Headed to the US? Ag guest workers to background

Page 62: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

35-day partial govt shutdown Dec18-Jan19 over wall funding

Page 63: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Red line is 654 miles of fencing; 1,295 miles of river

Page 64: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal
Page 65: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

6 prototypes of border walls

Page 66: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Trump base wants wall; does not want immigration

Page 67: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Most Americans: immigration helps more than hurts

Page 68: The Farm Labor Prosperity Paradox Philip Martin: plmartin@ucdavis · Highlights 1 • Hired workers: average employ, 1.2 million in 2016; 900,000 crop & crop support; 300,000 animal

Labor strategies & water

Individual or collective effort to increase supply?