Upload
phunganh
View
215
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Established by the European Commission
© Art & Build Architect / Montois Partners / credits: S. Brison
European Research Council
The ERC’s quest to support excellent
researchers all over Europe
•
• Prof Eva Kondorosi,
• Chair of the ERC
• Scientific Council Working Group on
• Widening European Participation
Ljubljana,
December 2016
Established by the European Commission
│ 2
To capitalise on the full European potential for
frontier research without departing from the ERC's
principle of excellence.
ERC Mission &
Widening European Participation
The ERC aims to:
Support the best of the best in Europe across all fields
of science
Promote wholly investigator-driven, or 'bottom-up' frontier research
Encourage the work of the established and next generation of top research
leaders in Europe
Reward innovative proposals by placing emphasis on the quality of the
idea rather than the research area
Raise the status and visibility of European frontier research and the very
best researchers of today and tomorrow
But also:
Established by the European Commission
│ 3
Geographical Location of Grants
Talent is everywhere
│ 3
Altogether
ERC grants
at 670
different
host
institutions
in 33
countries
Established by the European Commission
│ 4
Concentration of ERC grants in research
intensive countries and top HI
90% of ERC grants in top 11 countries
50% of ERC grants in top 50 institutions
Established by the European Commission
│ 5
The ERC potential in certain countries seems
to be above their current performance
Share of EU13 public
researchers in EU&AC =
16%
Share of EU13 highly
cited publications in
EU&AC = 5%
Share of EU13 research
investment (GERD) in
EU&AC = 3%
+AC
Share of
ERC grants
& budget
Established by the European Commission
│ 6
Significantly different success rates
by country of HI
Average success rate around 11%
Success rate for the region 1%
Established by the European Commission
│ 7
0,00
5,00
10,00
15,00
20,00
25,00
30,00
35,00
40,00
45,00
CH
IL
NL
DK
UK
SE
BE
FI
AT
CY
IE
NO
FR
DE
ES
IS
IT
PT
HU
EL
EE
LU
CZ
SI
HR
LV
BG
PL
SK
RS
TR
RO
Number of ERC Grants per
1 million inhabitants
As talents are everywhere why are
certain countries more successful
than others?
Established by the European Commission
│ 8
ERC Grants versus GERD:
lower research investment in the region
Host countries as of
19/09/2016
Linear fit
Established by the European Commission
│ 9
ERC Grants versus Top Publications:
Lower number of top publication
Host countries as of
19/09/2016
Linear fit
Established by the European Commission
│ 10
• Relatively low number of applications
from EU13 countries
Established by the European Commission
│ 11
Most ERC grantees from the region
are abroad (brain drain)
Over 80% of PIs with nationality
from the region are have their
ERC grant hosted abroad
Established by the European Commission
│ 12
Average weighted total yearly salary per countries (2006 in €)
Country Average
weighted total
yearly salary
adjusted
Country Average
weighted total
yearly salary
adjusted
Switzerland 82.725 Spain 34.908
Luxembourg 63.865 Portugal 29.001
Austria 62.406 Malta 28.078
Denmark 61.355 Slovenia 27.756
Ireland 60.727 Greece 25.685
Netherlands 59.103 Czech
Republic
19.620
Norway 58.997 Croatia 16.671
Belgium 58.462 Turkey 16.249
Germany 56.132 Hungary 15.812
Sweden 56.053 Lithuania 13.851
United Kingdom 56.048 Estonia 11.748
France 50.879 Poland 11.659
Iceland 50.803 Latvia 10.488
Cyprus 45.039 Slovakia 9.178
Finland 44.635 Romania 6.286
Israel 42.552 Bulgaria 3.556
Italy 36.201
In April 2007 the European Commission
published a comparison of researchers
salaries across Europe, based on an
online survey. The chart gives the
average salaries adjusted to the cost of
living in each country.
Significant differences in salary
levels across Europe
Established by the European Commission
│ 13
• Too many weak applications from EU13
Compared to
26% evaluated step 2
and
32% C for EU15
Established by the European Commission
│ 14
Too many weak applications from the
region
Compared to
27 % evaluated step 2
and
31% C for EU15
(9%)
(23%)
(68%)
Established by the European Commission
│ 17
Success rate by evaluation step
Stumbling block at step 1
Large majority of applications from the region fail at step1,
success rate of those that reach Step2 is close to average.
Established by the European Commission
│ 18
Low number of re-applications average over calls 2009-2016
Success rate of returning applicants is higher!
Established by the European Commission
Low international mobility:
Researchers (post-PhD) with a period of at least three months as in another
country in the last 10 years, Europe, 2012 (%)
Established by the European Commission
│ 20
Widening European Participation
ERC Working Group
Identify possible actions that could be taken by the ERC to support the best
scientists from weak participating European countries and encourage them
to apply to the ERC.
Established by the European Commission
Low international profile of research: lack of international dynamics and mobility
Unattractiveness of research environment: scientific isolation, missing culture of
scientific excellence, lack of open and merit based reward system
Poor career prospective: lack of science career building programmes and long-
term research career prospective, non-merit based recruitment practices
Low levels of research investment: low salaries for top scientists, lack of
additional and sustainable funding: ERC top-up, ERC runners-up, ERC exit
programmes
Inadequate research funding systems: not appropriate for pursuing ambitious
projects
Lack of institutional support to ERC applicants and grantees provided locally:
administration of HI, NCPs, colleagues and peers, personal coaching
│ 21
Conclusions: Bottlenecks for higher inclusiveness
in ERC competitions
2014: ERC Widening participation survey [n=788]
National, institutional conditions matter!
Established by the European Commission
Increase research investment
Research capacity building and strengthening of local research infrastructure: use
of EU structural funds
Reform of national/local research systems along best practices for nurturing
scientific excellence: competition based research funding, open merit based
recruitment, performance based salaries,...
Internationalisation of research: fostering international mobility and cross-border
scientific exchange, raising attractiveness of research environment
Strengthening local support to ERC applicants and grantees: financial support for
ERC runners-up, training days, workshops, seminars, and coaching for ERC candidates,
but also their supporting services
Bring back the most talented scientists from abroad with attractive research funding
and salaries (for 5 years) that are prospective candidates for ERC grants
│ 22
Actions to be taken at national level
Encourage talented scientists to apply with strong, well prepared proposals:
international mobility/ training before applying (ERC visiting fellowship), personal
encouragement and support from the best scientists,...
Established by the European Commission
│ 23
ERC EVALUATION PROCEDURE
Awareness raising of ERC panel chairs to unequal conditions of applicants
allowing to pass more excellent/promising projects for detailed Step 2 evaluation
INTERNATIONAL MOBILITY TRAINING
Promotion of visiting research fellowships to ERC grantees
SUPPORTING CAPACITY BUILDING
Supporting promising unfunded ERC applications through EEA&Norway Grants
POLICY SUPPORT with RECOMMENDATIONS
Organisation of regional ERC widening participation events: open forum with all
relevant national stakeholders to identify actions/strategies for higher success
rate in ERC calls.
Zagreb (2014), Tallinn (2015), Budapest (2015), Krakow (2016), Wroczlaw (Nov. 2016), Ljubljana (Dec 2016)
How can ERC help:
ERC Widening Participation Actions
Established by the European Commission
│ 24
Fellowship to visit ERC grantee –
ERC guidelines
Scheme: Short term research visit (a min 3 to max 6 months) in an ERC team:
international exposure, grant application coaching
Funding: by a national research-funding organization of a country in the European
Research Area, no additional funding is provided by ERC.
Eligibility: Open to all excellent researchers working in ERA, through public, open
competitions through evaluation panels composed by researchers of high repute
and based on excellence and potential for an ERC grant application.
Condition: A letter of support signed by an ERC grantee and his/her Host
Institution stating that in case the applicant is selected he/she will be hosted as
member of the research team of the PI (facilitated by the ERC via Call for
expression of interest)
Successful applicants must sign a letter of commitment to apply for
an ERC grant no later than one/two year(s) after the end of the visit.
Established by the European Commission
Fellowship to visit ERC grantee –
Results of the first call (Sept 2016)
│ 25
All PIs (~2800) of the main grants who have at least 18 months until the
end of the project were invited to express their interest to host a visiting
fellow through these 6 national programmes.
Positive response from 724 (26%) Pis, with good and balanced
geographic (29 countries) and thematic (all ERC panels) coverage.
Participating countries/regions: • Czech Republic
• Hungary
• Estonia
• Poland
• Slovenia
• Belgium (Flanders region)
Next ERC Call in May 2017 for national/regional fellowship
programmes launched in 2017/2018.
Established by the European Commission
│ 26
Excellence Grants
for runners-up
ERC Step 2 As
(Stg, CoG, AdG)
ERC non-funded Step 2 As in AdG, CoG and StG calls: full
funding of their ERC proposed project coupled with a short
term visit/exchange to/from Donor State
Maturing Excellence Grants
ERC Step2 Bs
(StG, CoG, AdG)
ERC non-funded Step 2 Bs in AdG, CoG and StG calls: 3-
24 months funding for further development of proposal
supported by a mentoring scheme and coupled with a
short term visit to an ERC or CoE research group in a
Donor State and optionally also in a third country.
Nurturing Excellence Grants
ERC Step1 Bs
(StG, CoG)
ERC non funded Step 1 Bs in CoG and StG calls:
3-6 months mobility funding for improvement of proposal
during a short term visit to an ERC or CoE research group
in a Donor State, and optionally also in a third country.
EEA&NORWAY Grants with ERC
Supporting ERC runners-up
│ 27
ERC Repatriation success story:
The driving forces of cell division
Croatia
Mic
rotu
bu
les in
actio
n d
uri
ng
ch
rom
oso
me
div
isio
n ©
Iva
To
lić
A leading cell biophysicist, Dr Tolic is the ERC 5000th
grantee. She has established her new lab in Croatia.
Background
Our body is constantly producing new cells to replace old or
damaged ones, at the rate of millions per second. During cell
division, cells pass on their genetic material from one
generation to the other: chromosomes are replicated, the cell
separates in two and an identical set of chromosomes is
inherited by each daughter cell.
Research
Dr Tolić wants to map out the forces acting on the
chromosomes during cell division, understand how they are
generated and how they act. She is interested in particular in
a new class of microtubules.
Importance
Results could be critical for the development of new
therapies against cancer, as this disease results from a cell
duplication process that, for some reason, is not regulated
correctly.
ERC Project: NEWSPINDLEFORCE
Iva Tolić
Ruđer Bošković Institute (Croatia)
ERC Consolidator Grant €2.1 mil.
Established by the European Commission
• Secretariat of the WG: Boris Kragelj [email protected]
• More information: erc.europa.eu
• National Contact Point: erc.europa.eu/national-contact-points
• Sign up for news alerts: erc.europa.eu/keep-updated-erc
│ 28
www.facebook.com/EuropeanResearchCouncil
twitter.com/ERC_Research
www.linkedin.com/company/european-research-council
The European Research Council