Upload
adela-williams
View
225
Download
4
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Ecological Engineering GroupBiological and Agricultural EngineeringUniversity of Arkansas
Algal Growth with Nutrient LimitationCompared to Light-Limiting Conditions in Ozark Streams
Andrea LudwigMarty Matlock, PhD, PE, CSEBrian Haggard, PhDBob Morgan, PE
EPA use attainability study
Research Goals
Identify a nutrient, periphytic chlorophyll-a relationship in Ozark streamsInvestigate circumstances of light-limitation to native algaePredict response of algal growth to differentiating canopy covers in the presence of variable nutrients
MethodologyMatlock periphytometers deployed at all sites
Chlorophyll-a used as indicator of abundance of algae
• Chlorophyll-a analysis done using trichromatic methods
Grab samples collected at each site and analyzed for nutrient concentrations
Light meters attached to Matlock periphytometers at selected sitesSite Selection
Coupled sites according to locations of WWTPs
Site Selection
The Matlock PeriphytometerAssembly
NutrientNutrientSolutionSolution
Lid w/ holeLid w/ holeGlass fiber filterGlass fiber filter
0.450.45 mm Nylon MembraneNylon Membrane
1 liter bottle1 liter bottle
NutrientSolution
Nutrients passivelydiffuse throughnylon membraneand GFF
FlowFlow
The Matlock PeriphytometerIn the field
Target PO4-P Level
0
25
50
75
Annual - average PO4-P (ppb)
An
nu
al -
av
erag
e ch
l a (
ug
/L)
0 100 200 300 400 500
Methodology
2-day and 14-day deployments of light meters
Sites chosen with comparison of light availability as single variable
Canopy cover used as indicator
MethodologyHardware
HOBO Micro StationSensed temperature and photosynthetic active radiation (PAR)
• Reading every 5 sec• Logged every 10 min
SoftwareBoxcarPro
ResultsOrtho Phosphate concentration to Chl-a
Relationshilp
y = 0.2545x + 0.4768
R2 = 0.069
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
0 0.5 1 1.5
Average Ortho Phosphate
Ave
rag
e C
hl-
a
• Phosphorous concentrations only account for 7% of variability of chlorophyll-a across sites
Results Fourteen- and Two-Day Deployments
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
2
0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0 500.0
Average PAR (uE)
Chl
orop
hyll
a (u
g/cm
2)
OSG030
SPG931UP
SPG931UP
SPG931DN
OSG930UP
OSG930DN
OSG045UP
OSG045DN
Site Avg Temp C
Avg PAR uE
Chlr a ug/cm2
OSG030 16.2 294.0 0.43
SPG931UP 16.4 133.1 0.06
SPG931UP 16.6 49.8 0.16
SPG931DN 21.2 30.3 1.88
OSG930UP 15.9 96.2 0.11
OSG930DN 17.5 468.2 0.11
OSG045UP 17.8 343.1 1.47
OSG045DN 17.4 68.9 0.31
• Two-day deployments of light meters provided inaccurate representation of average light availabilityto periphytometer
Results2-day deployments failed to give good representation of light conditions at sites
14-day deployments logged definite diurnal cycles and more data points
14-Day Deployment - SPG931UP
0
5
10
15
20
25
Day
Tem
pera
ture
C
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PA
R u
E
Temp
PAR
14-Day Deployment - OSG030
0
5
10
15
20
25
Day
Tem
pera
ture
C
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
PA
R u
E
Temp
PAR
• Due to time restrictions, only one round of 14-day deployments were completed
ResultsFourteen-Day Deployments
00.05
0.10.15
0.20.25
0.30.35
0.40.45
0.5
0.0 100.0 200.0 300.0 400.0
Average PAR (uE)
Ch
loro
ph
yll
a (
ug
/cm
2)
OSG030
SPG931UP
Summary
Nutrient concentrations do affect algal growth
However, when nutrients are high and light is low, algal growth becomes light limited at very low production levels
Riparian zone management is critical for protecting nutrient enriched streams
Future Work / ImprovementsAdditional study of nutrient-limited situations in Ozark streamsRemoving any variability of nutrients in sites
Deployment of light meters and Matlock periphytometers at same site with different canopy covers
Defining a relationship of chlorophyll-a and nutrient concentrations with a second variable of light
Multiple light meter couples at sites with multiple nutrient and canopy characteristics
Acknowledgements
Eric CummingsBrian SchafferMatt BrutonDebrata SahooSujit EkkaKyle Kruger