32
1 15-02-2010 The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling Major John Janssens DMO / C3I / Simulation Expertise Centre

The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    5

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

1

15

-02

-2010

The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim

coupling Major John Janssens DMO / C3I / Simulation Expertise Centre

Page 2: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

Report Documentation Page Form ApprovedOMB No. 0704-0188

Public reporting burden for the collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response, including the time for reviewing instructions, searching existing data sources, gathering andmaintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this collection of information,including suggestions for reducing this burden, to Washington Headquarters Services, Directorate for Information Operations and Reports, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, ArlingtonVA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person shall be subject to a penalty for failing to comply with a collection of information if itdoes not display a currently valid OMB control number.

1. REPORT DATE FEB 2010

2. REPORT TYPE N/A

3. DATES COVERED -

4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling

5a. CONTRACT NUMBER

5b. GRANT NUMBER

5c. PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER

6. AUTHOR(S) 5d. PROJECT NUMBER

5e. TASK NUMBER

5f. WORK UNIT NUMBER

7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) DMO / C3I / Simulation Expertise Centre

8. PERFORMING ORGANIZATIONREPORT NUMBER

9. SPONSORING/MONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES) 10. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S ACRONYM(S)

11. SPONSOR/MONITOR’S REPORT NUMBER(S)

12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT Approved for public release, distribution unlimited

13. SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES See also ADA564685. 2010 Coalition Battle Management Language Workshop (Atelier 2010 sur le langagede gestion du champ de bataille pour les operations en coalition). RTO-MP-MSG-079

14. ABSTRACT

15. SUBJECT TERMS

16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF: 17. LIMITATION OF ABSTRACT

SAR

18. NUMBEROF PAGES

31

19a. NAME OFRESPONSIBLE PERSON

a. REPORT unclassified

b. ABSTRACT unclassified

c. THIS PAGE unclassified

Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8-98) Prescribed by ANSI Std Z39-18

Page 3: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

2

Contents

•Introduction

• The TACTIS project and C2 – SIM integration

• Using a COTS datamapper

• Phased approach for TACTIS C2 – SIM integration

• Recommendations

Page 4: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

3

Introduction

C2 – Simulation Integration

1. Training systems

2. Mission rehearsal

3. Decision support

Command & Control (C2) systems should be integrated

with simulators for:

15

-02

-2010

Page 5: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

4

Introduction

Objective and reason for study

Objective

• Find a reusable solution for coupling C2-Sim systems

for the long term

Reason

• Urgency in project TACTIS.

Principles/conditions

• Use operational C2 equipment and applications

• The C2 systems should not need adjustment for C2 -

sim coupling

Page 6: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

Introduction

Operational systems

YAS-4442

YPR BDR

Operational

environment

FENNEK

15

-02

-2010

CV90 IGV

Page 7: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

6

Introduction

What is TACTIS ?

Objective

• Find a reusable solution for coupling C2-Sim systems

for the long term

Reason

• Urgency in project TACTIS.

Page 8: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

7

C2 Simulation integration

1. The TACTIS project required Command & Control

(C2) integration with simulation for unit level training

using Virtual and Constructive simulators.

2. A reusable solution leads to the requirement that

integration of other simulators, like the Command

Staff Trainer (Constructive Simulation), must also be

supported.

Page 9: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

8

TACTIS

ATOS

ADOS

Observer trainer

INLSIM

LKSIM

MCTC

VBS2

Steelbeasts

NL-CST

FAC Trainer

AFSIS

ISIS

OSIRIS

Training Simulators Command & Control (C2)

XANTHOS

Scope

Page 10: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

C2 Framework

Presentation

support

Persistency

service

Data

service

MIP

gateway

Synchronization

Distribution

service

TITAAN

(networking)

CNR

networking

Applications

The NL C2 domain (1)

15

-02

-2010

Page 11: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

Applications

AFSIS ISIS XANTOS OSIRIS

The NL C2 domain (2)

15

-02

-2010

Page 12: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

11

TACTIS

ATOS

ADOS

Observer trainer

INLSIM

LKSIM

MCTC

VBS2

Steelbeasts

NL-CST

FAC Trainer

AFSIS

ISIS

OSIRIS

Training Simulators Command & Control (C2)

XANTHOS

Scope

Page 13: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

12

NL simulation training domain

Training Simulators

Artillery procedure chain trainer

Air Defense procedure trainer

Observer trainer

Forward Air Controller simulator

Command and Staff trainer

Logistics supply chain simulator

Intelligence simulator

Tactical Indoor simulation

Mobile Combat Training Centre

Game Steelbeasts

Game VBS2

TACTIS

ATOS

ADOS

Observer trainer

INLSIM

LKSIM

MCTC

VBS2

Steelbeasts

NL-CST

FAC Trainer

Page 14: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

13

TACTIS

ATOS

ADOS

Observer trainer

INLSIM

LKSIM

MCTC

VBS2

Steelbeasts

NL-CST

FAC Trainer

AFSIS

ISIS

OSIRIS

Training Simulators Command & Control (C2)

XANTHOS

Scope

MIP – DEM

JC3IEDM

HLA, DIS

Page 15: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

14

Used input for the C2 - Sim information

exchange analysis

• User requirements for training systems

• Standards under development:

MSDL, C-BML

• Experience with existing

C2 –Sim links

Page 16: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

15

User Requirements for the TACTIS situation

3. Plans and orders

1. Common Operational Picture

2. Simulation and

C2 system control

Page 17: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

16

Take into account (long-term)

• MSDL (for initialization of simulations)

• C-BML (plans and orders)

Standards under development

Page 18: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

OSIRIS MCTC

Result in MCTC is AAR data for instructors

• COP (Perceived truth as seen by players)

• Ground truth (from MCTC)

AFSIS ATOS

Result in AFSIS: COP, Fire support reports, Fire support requests

COTS

DATAMAPPER

DATAMAPPER Dedicated

DATAMAPPER

Experience with existing C2 – Sim coupling

MCTC-logger

15

-02

-2010

Page 19: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

What is a Datamapper

Data-

mapper

System A System B

Protocol B Protocol A

15

-02

-2010

Page 20: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

Claimed capabilities

•Standard protocols HLA 1516(Pitch, MÄK, NG), HLA 1.3(GERTICO, MÄK),

DIS, MIP (Multilateral Interoperability program C2IEDM), Link 16, Google

Earth/Maps, Web Services

•Proprietary protocols WISE SecureSocket, SAFIR DOB, (Saab C2-C4), PDU

2.0 (Saab TES), WCU (Saab Civilian C2), OneSAF, BattleTek, Saab Gizmo

Distribution, SQL Server, LinkZA, RBS 70 (SBD), Enemy Territory, Microsoft

Combat FS

•Future Link 11, Link 22, C-BML, TENA, PDU 3.0, DDS, MIP(JC3IEDM), HLA

Evolved, MATREX RTI, RTI NG Pro, CoT

15

-02

-2010

Benefits •Automatic connections

•User defined connections

•Analyzing and testing

•No modifications are needed

Disadvantages •Stuck to one manufacturer

•No NLD experience with all capabilities

•Some problems can’t be solved by datamapping

WISE, a typical COTS Datamapper

Page 21: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper

• Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper

• Not all required standards implemented yet

• Use of operational C2 systems can be supported for COP

• Simulation and C2 systems control cannot be supported

• Plans and Orders to Constructive sims cannot be supported

15

-02

-2010

Page 22: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

21

Short Term Recommendations

1. Use a Phased Approach

• Phase 1 Common Operational Picture

• Phase 2 Logging and AAR

• Phase 3 Exchange of orders and plans

2. Acquisition and use of the WISE COTS datamapper

Result after phase 1

• An acceptable initial solution for TACTIS

• An first step to a solution for other systems

• Short term, does not contradict BML standard under development

3. More experiments with existing systems (C2, CST, TACTIS)

4. Analyzing user requirements for C2 systems wrt DSS

Page 23: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

22

HLA

Logging

TACTIS coupling Current situation

CGF Vehicle

Sim

Vehicle

Sim

Ground truth

Page 24: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

23

HLA

Logging

TACTIS coupling Current situation with C2 added

CGF Vehicle

Sim

Vehicle

Sim

C2FW

OSIRIS OSIRIS

rep

orts

ove

rlays

rep

orts

ove

rlays

Only Red COP from blue Virtuals in OSIRIS

Perceived truth

Ground truth

RE

D C

OP

RE

D C

OP

Page 25: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

24

OSIRIS

C2FW

HLA

OSIRIS

rep

orts

ove

rlays

rep

orts

ove

rlays

Logging CGF Vehicle

Sim

Vehicle

Sim

Data-

mapper

No communications effects simulated in phase 1

Red+blue COP from blue Virtuals in OSIRIS

Blue COP from blue Constructives in OSIRIS

Perceived truth

Ground truth

TACTIS coupling (phase 1) Possible solution with C2 systems (for virtuals)

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

RE

D C

OP

B

LU

E+

Page 26: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

25

OSIRIS

C2FW

HLA

OSIRIS

rep

orts

ove

rlays

rep

orts

ove

rlays

Logging

GT

TACTIS coupling (phase 2A) prerequisites for C2/Sim control and AAR

CGF Vehicle

Sim

Vehicle

Sim

Data-

mapper

Logging

C2

AAR

Perceived truth

Ground truth

Red+blue COP from blue Virtuals in OSIRIS

Blue COP from blue Constructives in OSIRIS

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

Page 27: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

26

OSIRIS

C2FW

HLA

OSIRIS

rep

orts

ove

rlays

rep

orts

ove

rlays

Logging

GT

TACTIS coupling (phase 2B) Red COP from CGFs added

CGF Vehicle

Sim

Vehicle

Sim

Data-

mapper

Logging

C2

AAR

Perceived truth

Ground truth

Red+blue COP from blue Virtuals in OSIRIS

Red+blue COP from blue Constructives in OSIRIS

BML

Red C

OP

from

blu

e C

GF

s

Re

d+

blu

e C

OP

from

blu

e V

irtua

ls

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

Page 28: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

27

OSIRIS

C2FW

HLA

OSIRIS

rep

orts

ove

rlays

rep

orts

ove

rlays

Logging

GT

TACTIS coupling (phase 3) Plans/Orders to Constructives added

CGF Vehicle

Sim

Vehicle

Sim

Data-

mapper

Logging

C2

AAR

Perceived truth

Ground truth

Red+blue COP from blue Virtuals in OSIRIS

Red+blue COP from blue Constructives in OSIRIS

BML

Red C

OP

from

blu

e C

GF

s

Re

d+

blu

e C

OP

from

blu

e V

irtua

ls

ISIS+

Re

po

rts

Pla

ns/o

rders

Pla

ns/o

rders

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

Page 29: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

28

OSIRIS

C2FW

HLA

OSIRIS

rep

orts

ove

rlays

rep

orts

ove

rlays

Logging

GT CGF Vehicle

Sim

Vehicle

Sim

Data-

mapper

Logging

C2

AAR

Perceived truth

Ground truth

Red+blue COP from blue Virtuals in OSIRIS

Red+blue COP from blue Constructives in OSIRIS

BML

Red C

OP

from

blu

e C

GF

s

Re

d+

blu

e C

OP

from

blu

e V

irtua

ls

ISIS+

Pla

ns/o

rders

Pla

ns/o

rders

Re

po

rts

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

TACTIS coupling (long term) BML for all tactical data, removal of datamapper

Page 30: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

29

OSIRIS

C2FW

HLA

OSIRIS

rep

orts

ove

rlays

rep

orts

ove

rlays

Logging

GT CGF Vehicle

Sim

Vehicle

Sim

Logging

C2

AAR

Perceived truth

Ground truth

Red+blue COP from blue Virtuals in OSIRIS

Red+blue COP from blue Constructives in OSIRIS

BML

Red C

OP

from

blu

e C

GF

s

Re

d+

blu

e C

OP

from

blu

e V

irtua

ls

ISIS+

Pla

ns/o

rders

Pla

ns/o

rders

Generic

TDL

Re

po

rts

Perceived truth

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

BL

UE

+

RE

D C

OP

TACTIS coupling (long term) Integration of BML in tactical datalink

Page 31: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

30

Long Term challenges

In order for C-BML to satisfy Training, Mission

Rehearsal and Decision Making requirements the

following challenges must be overcome

• Simulation + C2 system control problem must be

solved (within or outside BML)

• All C2 and Simulator systems must understand C-

BML

• C-BML must not only be human readable but must

unambiguously be transformable to an overlay

• BML and existing tactical datalinks (like the NLD MIP

based C2FW) must be integrated in the end

Page 32: The Dutch perspective on C2 - Sim coupling · Conclusions wrt COTS datamapper •Positive experience with (COTS) datamapper •Not all required standards implemented yet •Use of

15

-02

-2010

31

End

Questions ??