The Displacement Theory of Gravity

7/29/2019 The Displacement Theory of Gravity

1/6

Theuniverse

is

infinite

of infinite realities

and iscomposed

that obey infinitephysical laws

thatvary

within infinitedimensions

In Isaac Newton's universe there were three dimensions: length, breadth and width

. These three dimensions could not be interpreted by elementary two dimensional


2/6

geometry so Newton created calculus.

'Time', in Newton's universe, was simply a measuring device which Newton called a

"duration" and the transmission of light, in Newton's cosmology, was instantaneous

Length, breadth and width were considered to be "constants" and the only variable

was motion.

Newton also said that "gravity" was an attracting force that existed betweenobjects.

Newton's 3D cosmology worked just fine in calculating the geometry of our solar

system until other astronomer/mathematicians discovered that the transmission of

light was not instantaneous. These other astronomer/mathematicians determinedthat light was "very fast" but not instantaneous. This discovery about light speed

threw a monkey wrench into Newton's celestial mechanics as applied to viewableevents occurring outside of our solar system.

In Albert Einstein's universe there are four dimensions: length, breadth, width

(called, collectively, 'space') and time. For Einstein, stationary objects in space

occupy three dimensions but these three dimensions are not constants.

Einstein called the three dimensions (length, breadth and width) "Space"and

considered "Time"as a forth dimension that is not just a passive measuring device

but interacts dynamically with the other three.

Einstein determined that all four components (length, breadth, width and time) of h

cosmology were variable depending upon velocity*.

To Einstein 'space-time' is the 'arena' upon-in-on which all

phenomena expresses existence.

Without either 'space' or 'time', existence, as we know it, is

impossible.'Space-time' is the fabric of the universe. Without 'space-time'

there is 'absolute nothing'. 'Absolute nothing' is beyond the

capacity of our mind to grasp. The best that we can do with

'nothing' is a 'relative nothing' or the absence of a'thing'. 'Absolute nothing', on the other hand, is utterly withoutattribute and defies description.

*This is a curious conclusion because if time is variable depending upon velocity then how does onmeasure 'velocity' which, typically, is 'time dependent'?

Einstein determined that the speed of light was a constant and unaffected by time (or space). But


3/6

how can one determine the speed of light when time is variable?

Then Stephen Hawking says, "then what happens to the velocity of light when time stops in a

blackhole"?

Einstein's cosmology is phenomenal because it means that time / space andmaterial objects are not fixed quantities, but rather, they are only temporarily fixed

quantities. They become variable and their structural mechanics start to rearrangewhen you introduce movement.

Einstein needed a constant in order to be able to measure the shifting of the

structure of time / space / matter / velocity. He determined that the constant herequired was the maximum speed of light, which is, the velocity of light when it is

unencumbered by matter and traveling through uncompressed space with zerogravity (i.e. a pure vacuum).

in a 'field' of 'light only'.....the maximum speed must be instantaneous

because the light is a 'unity'

Einstein also said (implied) that there are three types of "space": Traditional

"space" which is (appears) empty, and a solid entity called "mass" and 'absolute

space' which is immeasureable and within which traditional space and mass expres

their existence.

In traditional geometry a three dimensional objectis thought to occupy space andthis analysis works fine for measuring a stationary object. However, once the

object starts moving it is no longer in a 3 dimensional Newtonian universe and but

enters the Einsteinian cosmology of "The Fourth Dimension".

Displacement Theory of Gravity

Gravity is described as an "apparent" attracting force that


4/6

exists between all objects that have mass.

Gravity is produced by the compression/expansion of spacearound and between objects that, in reality, do not occupy

space but, rather, displace it.

The immediate space surrounding an object is expanded(stretched) and the space between objects (distance) in space

is compressed. As such, 'the entity' of space exhibits

characteristics identical to those of 'time'.

All matter has an 'event horizon'. The 'event horizon' is the

borderline between gravity being an apparent attracting forceand gravity being an apparent repelling force.

Within the Earth's 'event horizon' objects fall because the spaceis s t r e t c h e d.

Outside of the Earth's 'event horizon' i.e., the space between

the Earth and the Moon, space is compressed.

It is the compression of space that causes gravity's apparent

repelling effect.

Thus "gravity" is a "push / pull" force that only seems like an

exclusively (apparent) attracting force.

Gravity travels at the same velocity as light.

As of yet, we do not fully comprehend all of the attributes of the

entity that we call 'space'.

Gravitational fields seem to bend light but the light only appears to be affected by

the gravitational field. The field that is affecting the flow of light is caused by thewarp of space created by the presence of matter displacing the immediate

surrounding space.

It is at this juncture that Stephen Hawking enters the playing field. Hawking's

credentials are as impressive as Albert Einstein's and Isaac Newton's. Stephen

determines that there is a theoretical place in the universe that contains huge


5/6

quantities of matter that have attained "infinite density" (a teaspoon full is estimate

to weigh hundreds of tons). Stephen calls these warped vortices "black holes"

because light cannot escape from the black hole's massive gravitational influence.

It is theorized that the escape velocity (the speed necessary to break free of a

gravitational influence) for a black hole exceeds the speed of light. Since light

speed is the maximum speed limit in the universe (Einstein) then it seems that once

you are in a black hole there is no escape (unless you can find a way to go faster than

light and then presumably go back in time and avoid entering the blackhole in the first place).

Einstein claims that material objects approaching light speed would begin to expand

(mass) exponentially. As a result of the expansion there would be an infinite

resistance to any increase in velocity. (Note: This is not a 'bug on the windshield' scenario

this is the vacuum of space which offers no resistance to motion). Einstein's theory establishe

"light speed" as the maximum speed limit in the universe and also raises the

possibility that a blackhole is only a handful of matter traveling at near light speed.

Hawking counters by stating that a spacecraft entering the outer envelope (Event

Horizon) of a black hole would appear, (to observers from a great distance), to slow

down to the point that "time", as we know it, would appear to stop.

The spacecraft passengers entering the blackhole would experience no temporaldistortion but would, according to Hawking, "be gradually squashed into spaghetti"

because of the infinitely crushing gravitational field.This scenario seems to be somewhat reminiscent of Christopher Columbus' crew fearing falling off

the edge of the Earth.Anyhow, time, in Hawking's theory, stops or slows to a crawl in a blackhole. In othe

words, in a blackhole both time and velocity cease.

So, the question is, "If light cannot be stopped (Einstein), and if light is trapped

inside of a black hole (Hawking) where time and velocity have stopped then what is

it that happens to the velocityof light without the presence of time? In other words,

how do you measure "light speed" without having time as a part of the equation?

It is at this juncture (paradox) that Einstein and Hawking part company. If light stopsin a black hole (Hawking) then time must stop also (Einstein interpreted).

Conclusion?: If black holes exist then a pure black hole would be virtually invisiblebecause its only interaction with external space would be a massive warp in the

space/time continuum. A black hole could only be detected by observing lightseeming to be bent and slowed down as it passed by the event horizon (outer

envelope) of the black hole.
http://www.aloha.net/~johnboy/blackhole.htg/black.holes.htmhttp://www.aloha.net/~johnboy/blackhole.htg/black.holes.htm


6/6

Another interpretation (my own) is that if blackholes are actually massive

accumulations of highly compressed matter, and not just a handful of matter whose

mass is expanding exponentially (sub-light velocity) then what happens in a black

hole is that hydrogen produces helium... then combustion... and then millions of

years later the combustion reaches the surface of the blackhole which is thentransformed into a star.

See also, The Pixie Dust Theory of Blackholes What does all of this mean?

It indicates that the universe, as we know it, is a vast vortex of energy and

phenomena that 'play-out' on the fabric of space-time.

It indicates that matter is stored energy (E=MC) that experiences temporal

distortions and variable mass depending upon velocity.

It indicates (suggests) that space and time (NOT the measurements but the 'entity'of space-time) are 'joined at the hip' and are (is) the initial ingredient for the

existence of any phenomena. (Perhaps 'space' also 'flows' like time and gravity

flow).

Registered Copyright john charles webb, jr, 1997-2008All Rights Reserved - United States of America
mailto:[email protected]://www.aloha.net/~johnboy/copynotice.htg/copynotice.htmhttp://www.aloha.net/~johnboy/sitemap.htg/sitemap.htm#linkshttp://www.aloha.net/~johnboy/blackhole.htg/black.holes.htm

Documents

The Displacement Theory of Gravity