THE DIFFERENCE:COMPARISON BETWEENEASA PART 66 & LWTR

Rafiq Afendi B. Ahmad

Muhammad Anas Farhan B. Abdul Manan

Mr Shamsudin B. Abdul Majid

UniKL MIAT, 2891, Jalan Jenderam Hulu, 43800 Dengkil Selangor

Abstract

The paper discusses how both the EASA Part 66 and LWTR licensing system differ from

one another along with the similarities that both licensing system possess. Specifically, it

is aimed to identify which licensing system is the best with a reason why it is the best

which is determined through collection of survey and distribution of guideline book.

Methodology

The research start with collection of

secondary data (journals, articles, ANs ,

books and etc) from aviation authorities

publications in order to construct the

related literature review .After the

accumulation of ‘secondary data, a

researcher-made guideline book called

‘Newbie’s Guide to EASA Part 66 &LWTR’

together with a questionnaire are

distributed to 14 selected respondents in

order to get opinions concerning which is

the best licensing system.

Result and DiscussionDifferences•Fees and charges under the EASA is more expensive compared to the BCAR.•LWTR require more training period .•How license holder achieve certification privileges.

Acknowledgement: We are heartily thankful to our supervisors, Mr Shamsudin B. Abd Majid for his guidance and support until the end of the project.

Conclusion

After thorough research ,it seems that the EASA licensing system offers the best solution

in advancement aviation technology training compared to the BCAR Section-L system as

it offers uncompromised uniform level of safety throughout the whole aviation community .

Rafiq AfendiDiploma of EngineeringTechnology in Helicopter Maintenance

Photo PhotoShamsudin Abd MajidPoweplant SectionPhoto

Muhd Anas FarhanDiploma of EngineeringTechnology in Helicopter Maintenance

Subject Number of vote

EASA is better than LWTR

6

LWTR is better than EASA

3

Does not side any licensing system

1

Respondents that think the guideline book is

useful

10

Respondents that recommends guideline book to be put in the

academic syllabus

10