27
The Determination of 226 Ra in Water Samples Anil H . Thakkar & Michael Fern Eichrom Technologies, Inc. David McCurdy Duke Engineering & Services

The Determination of 226 Ra in Water Samples

  • Upload
    ovidio

  • View
    24

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

The Determination of 226 Ra in Water Samples. Anil H . Thakkar & Michael Fern Eichrom Technologies, Inc. David McCurdy Duke Engineering & Services. Objectives. To design a procedure for radium in water which would: be a simple, short and quick procedure - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

The Determination of 226Ra in Water Samples

Anil H. Thakkar & Michael Fern

Eichrom Technologies, Inc.

David McCurdy

Duke Engineering & Services

Page 2: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Objectives

• To design a procedure for radium in water which would: – be a simple, short and quick procedure

– allow to measure Ra-226 and Ra-224 via alpha spectroscopy and Ra-228 via Ac-228 measurements

– eliminate the tedious steps of precipitation and metathesis

Page 3: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Current Procedure Used

• Barium sulfate precipitation

• Conversion to BaCO3- tedious and time consuming

Page 4: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Sample + Ba carrier + Ba-133 + Conc.H2SO4_+ Heat BaSO4

Precipitate allowed to settle for several hours or overnight

Precipitate collected and converted to BaCO3

Current Procedure Used

Page 5: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

New Approach

Water samples

Cation exchange resin column

Eichrom Ln Resin column

Page 6: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Preparation of Water Samples

• 0.5 L / 1.0 L water samples

• Acidified to pH 2

• Add 133Ba as a tracer

Page 7: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Eichrom Cation Exchange Column

• Load solution: 0.5 L/ 1.0 L of sample

• Rinse with 50 mL of 0.1M HNO3

• Strip Ra and Ba with 50 mL of 8M HNO3

Page 8: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Preparation of Load Solution for Ln Resin Column

• Evaporate eluent from cation exchange column to dryness

• Dissolve residue in 10 ml of 0.095M HNO3 acid

• Load on Eichrom Ln Resin column

Page 9: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Ln Resin Column Separation

(1) Load: 10 mL of 0.095M HNO3,

(3) Strip: 10 mL of 0.35M HNO3

collect (3) for 228Ac

(2) Rinse: 15 mL of 0.095M HNO3

Collect (1) and (2) for Ba & 226Ra

Page 10: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

226Ra Via Alpha Spectrometry

• Evaporate 226Ra/133Ba fraction to 10 mL volume

• Add 0.1 ml of 0.75 mg/ml barium carrier

• Add 3 mL of 40% sodium sulfate, 4 drops of 1:1 acetic acid. Swirl

• Add 0.2 mL of seeding suspension. Mix

• Place tubes in cold water bath for 30 minutes

• Filter on 0.1 micron filters, count via alpha spectrometry

Page 11: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

133Ba Via Gamma Counter

• Count 133Ba tracer yield via gamma spectrometry

eichrom

Page 12: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

228Ac Via Gas-Flow Proportional Counter

• Add 50 micrograms of cerium carrier

• Add 1.0 mL of HF

• Filter on 0.1 micron filters

• Measure for beta radiation

Page 13: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

226Ra % Recoveries-0.5L DI Water

0102030405060708090

100

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14

Sample #

Page 14: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

226Ra Alpha Spectrum

Page 15: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

133Ba Gamma Spectrum

Page 16: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

226Ra, 224Ra, and Daughters

226 Ra222Rn

224Ra

218Po220Rn

Page 17: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

226Ra % Recoveries in Tap water

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

1 2 3 4 5

Sample #

4 Tap Water (0.5L)5 Tap Water (1.0 L)

Page 18: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

226Ra in EPA SampleSept.18, 1998

Sample # Ba-133 %Yield

EichrompCi/L

1 89 1.56

2 100 1.23

3 98 1.45

Average 95.7 + 6 1.41 + 0.17

Expected EPAValue

1.7 + 0.5

Page 19: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

226Ra in NJ Sample

Sample # Ba-133 %Yield

EichrompCi/L

1 100 8.18 + 0.99

2 82 9.10 + 1.2

Average 91 8.64 + 1

Expected NJValue

- 9.1 + 0.5

Page 20: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

226Ra in Georgia Inst. Of Tech. Sample# S8933

Sample # Ba-133 %Yield

EichrompCi/L

S8933 88 22.6 + 3.0

Expected Value - 18.0 + 2.0

Page 21: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

226Ra in Georgia Inst. Of Tech. Sample# WS 14776

Sample # Ba-133 %Yield

EichrompCi/L

WS 14776 88 4.14 + 0.58

Expected Value - 3.3 + 0.3

Page 22: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Ca and Mg Interference

• 50, 100, 200, 400 and 500 ppm of Ca and Mg solutions were tested

• 500 mL and 100 mL volumes tested

Page 23: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Ca and Mg Interference in 500 mL Samples

Effect of Ca & Mg on Ra-226 Recoveries

75%61%

54%

0.00% 0.00%

87% 82%71% 70% 74%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

0.00 100.00 200.00 600.00 1000.00

Ca & Mg ppm

% R

a-22

6 Ca PPM

Mg PPM

Page 24: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Ca Interference in 100 mL of Sample

Effect of Ca on Ba-133 and Ra-226 Recoveries100 mL Sample

99% 99%97%

101%

90%

97%99%

95%

103%

87%

75%

80%

85%

90%

95%

100%

105%

100.00 200.00 300.00 400.00 500.00

Ca ppm

% B

a-13

3/R

a-22

6

Ba-133

Ra-226

Page 25: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Detection Limits

Samplevolume Count Time

Detection.Limit

0.5 L 1000 min 0.09 pCi/L

0.5 L 240 min0.3 pCi/L

0.2 L 240 min 0.9 pCi/L

0.1 L 480 min 0.9 pCi/L

Page 26: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Summary

• <1.0 pCi/L detection limits achievable

• A good replacement for BaSO4 precipitation

• Eliminates inconsistent metathesis steps

• Reduces usage of chemicals/reagents

• Provides consistency and saves time

• High amounts of Ca and Mg interferences handled well with 100 mL samples

• Acceptable 226Ra recoveries

Page 27: The Determination of  226 Ra in Water Samples

Special thanks to

Dr. B. Parsa, New Jersey department of health, NJ

Dr. B. Kahn, Georgia Institute of Technology, GA

Acknowledgements