Upload
chester-stewart-andrews
View
221
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Debate Over Monetary and Fiscal Policy
15
Debates over Monetary and Fiscal Policy
• Stabilization policy• During the 2008-09 financial crisis the Obama
administration and the FED took dramatic steps to offset the recession.• Fiscal policy was classic text-book response. • Monetary policy started off “conventional” and then
went “unconventional”(see previous chapter)
• Some prominent economists feel attempts to stabilize the economy don’t work – best to either stay out or follow a fixed rule.
• Up to this point we have studied Keynesian type theories. Now we talk about Monetarism and compare
• Debates over the appropriate design of policy
From Chapter 11 - Some Harsh Realities
• Complications• Expectations, technology, events abroad, and
other factors constantly shift expenditure functions
• Multipliers not precisely known• Full-employment GDP difficult to measure• Fiscal policies act with time lags• Politicians are in charge
3
Chapter 11:Problems and Complication With Fiscal Policy
4
0
Real GDP
Rea
l Exp
endi
ture 45°
C+I+G0+(X-IM)
7,000
PotentialGDP
(a)
Recessionary gap is a guess
Expectations, technology, events abroad, and other factors constantly shift expenditure functions – AE is not stable or predictable
Full-employment GDP difficult to measure
6,000
Monetarism, Velocity and the Quantity Theory of Money
• The Quantity Theory of Money• Velocity
• Number of times per year that an “average dollar” is spent on goods and services
• Calculated as the ratio of nominal gross domestic product (GDP) to the number of dollars in the money stock• V = Nominal GDP / Money Stock
5
Velocity
• Nominal GDP• Measure of money value of transactions• Real GDP (Y) x Price level (P)
6
Velocity (V )=Value of Transactions
Money Stock¿
Nominal GDPM ¿
P xYM
Velocity
• M x V = P x Y: Equation of Exchange• States that the money value of GDP
transactions must be equal to the product of the average stock of money times velocity
• Note this an arithmetic link (i.e., true by definition), not economic
7
Quantity Theory Of Money
• Quantity theory of money• Assumes that velocity is (approximately)
constant so nominal GDP is proportional to the money stock
• Rewrite equation of exchange in growth rates
• If velocity is constant then %ΔV = 0
• If true, monetary policy is simple - rate of growth in the money supply determines nominal GDP.
8
% Δ M x % Δ V=% Δ P x % ΔY
M xV =P xY
Figure 1 Velocity of Circulation, 1929–2013
9
In real world, velocity not constant
Velocity• Strict quantity theory not an adequate
model of AD because V is not constant• Determinants of velocity
• Changes in/and efficiency of payments system• Funds move quickly in and out of M1 and M2
• Interest rates• Interest rate is the opportunity cost of holding money.• As interest rates increase, people hold smaller cash
balances which means the stock of money circulates faster
• velocity increases when interest rates rise.
10
Velocity
• If velocity is NOT constant (or predictable) the impact of monetary policy is not predictable.
• As the Fed increases the money supply (M)
• Interest rates fall so velocity falls as well• Part of the impact of the increase in M is offset fall a
decrease in V• M x V increase by a smaller percentage than M
11
M xV =P xY
Velocity
• Monetarism • Uses the equation of exchange to organize and analyze
macroeconomic data • Assumes velocity (V) change is fairly predictable,
especially in long run
• versus Keynesians:C + I + G + NX = Y
12
% Δ M x % Δ V=% Δ P x % ΔY
• Two competing theories of AD.• In Keynesian theory: M => r => I = Y• In Monetarism: M => P x Y , role of money not
limited to working through the interest rate.
Should the Fed Use Unconventional Policy?
• Conventional monetary policy is hard enough!• Adjust the federal funds rate using open market operations
• Expansionary policy• Purchase T-Bills to increase bank reserves and
reduce the federal funds rate• Contractionary policy
• Sell T-Bills to decrease bank reserves and increase the federal funds rate
• Lend reserves to banks
13
Monetary Policy Chain of Causation
Expansionary Policy
(1) Injection of reserves into the banking system pushes down interest rates
Need to know how sensitive interest rates are to change in reserves
Monetary Policy Chain of Causation
Expansionary Policy
(1) Injection of bank reserves pushes down interest rates
Need to know how sensitive C and I are to changes in interest ratesNeed to know size of multiplier.
(2) Lower r, stimulates investment and possibly consumer spending
(3) An increase in I and C causes total spending to increase
(4) GDP increases: multiplier analysis
Should the Fed Use Unconventional Policy?
• Unconventional monetary policies (from chapter 14)• Created bank reserves by buying other assets
• Treasury bonds, private-sector assets, MBS• Lent massive amounts to banks and to some
nonbanks• Emergency “rescue” operations for troubled
institutions• Why the extraordinary policies?
• Federal funds rate reached zero• Fed could do nothing or try unconventional policies
16
Should the Fed Use Unconventional Policy
• 2009, FOMC – purchased over $1 trillion of MBS• Interest rate spreads on MBS over Treasuries had soared• Even with high spreads no buyers for MBS• With high spread, mortgage rates remained high• Fed intent was to to raise MBS prices and lower yields• Result: MBS yields and mortgage rates fell
17
Should the Fed Use Unconventional Policy?
• Why did the Fed take the risk of purchasing MBS?• Time was of the essence; Congress moves to slow to
address unfolding housing crisis• Only the central bank can serve as lender of last resort• Size of the federal budget deficit constrained fiscal policy
• Criticisms of Fed’s unconventional policies• Assuming authority that belongs to the Congress
• Fed was choosing which companies would fail or not• Putting tax payer money at risk• Huge injection of reserves opening the door to future
inflation
18
Should Policy Makers Fight Asset Price Bubbles?
• Defined – asset prices rise above fundamental value• Fed’s tradition answer is no. Two main reasons.
• Difficult to identifying bubbles before they burst• How do we separate fundamentals from the “bubbly”
• Fed may not have any policy instruments that it can use to target just the bubble, e.g., run away stock prices.
• Increasing interest rates might deflate bubble but also slow economy
19
Should Policy Makers Fight Asset Price Bubbles??
• Rethinking the issue – it is impossible to prevent “bubbles” but possible to limit the impact• Most harmful bubbles financed by heavy borrowing
and extensive use of leverage: housing vs. tech stock bubble
• Rather than prevent bubbles, mitigate the consequences
• Better awareness/monitoring of bank lending practices• Reduce the use of leverage• The Dodd-Frank Act of 2010
• Bubbles are inherent part of cycle of financial capitalism• Sturdier financial system can limit size and effects of bubbles
20
Should We Rely on Fiscal or Monetary Policy?
• The great recession rekindled an old debate. Should we rely on fiscal or monetary policy
• Which policy type works faster?• Lags in stabilization policy
• Delays between the time when the need for stabilization policy arises and the time when the policy has its actual effects on the economy
• The lags can be long and variable.
21
Time Lags The use of discretionary monetary and fiscal
policy is hampered by three time lags: Recognition lag—the time it takes to figure out
that fiscal policy action is needed. Policy-making lag (implementation lag)—the time
it takes Congress to pass the laws needed to change taxes or spending.
Impact lag—the time it takes from passing a tax or spending change to its effect on real GDP being felt.
Regarding Fiscal Policy -•Economists have diverging views about the size of the spending and tax multipliers because there is insufficient empirical evidence on which to pin their size with accuracy.
•This fact makes it impossible for Congress to determine the amount of stimulus needed to close a given output gap.
•Also, the actual output gap is not known and can only be estimated with error.
•So discretionary fiscal policy is risky business.
Lags also apply to Monetary Policy?
• Recognition lag is the same for fiscal and monetary policy
• Policy and Impact lags are very different
• Fiscal policy• Changes in G or T affect aggregate demand faster than
monetary policies • G has an immediate impact• But fiscal policy has long policy lags
• Monetary policy• Policy lags normally much shorter
• FOMC meets often and on short notice if necessary• Policy decisions executed immediately• But monetary policy has a long impact lag.
24
• Conventional wisdom• Although monetary policy takes longer to take effect, short
policy lags win out
• Questioning conventional wisdom• Congress can act quickly when it must• Massive recessionary gap suggested both necessary• Once the federal funds rate reaches zero conventional
monetary policy could use help from fiscal policy
25
Should We Rely on Fiscal or Monetary Policy?
The Shape of the AS Curve: Flat or Steep
• Another debate over stabilization policy is the shape of the aggregate supply curve.
• Think about what happens to price and GDP when there is a change in AD.
26
Alternative Views of the Aggregate Supply Curve
27
Real GDP
Pric
e le
vel
S
S
(a)
Real GDP
Pric
e le
vel
S
S
(b)
Steep aggregate supply curve
Flat aggregate supply curve
Stabilization Policy with a Flat Aggregate Supply Curve
28
Pric
e Le
vel
0
Real GDP
6,4006,000
S
S
D0
D0
100
E101
D1
D1
A
(a) Expansionary policy
Pric
e Le
vel
0
Real GDP
5,600 6,000
S
S
D0
D0
100
E
99
D2
D2
B
(b) Contractionary policy
Rise inoutput
Rise in priceFall in price
Fall inoutput
• Expansionary policy leads to a substantial increase in real GDP with only a small increase in inflation.
• This is desirable.• Can expand the economy with little inflation cost.
• Contractionary policy however requires a large decrease in real GDP to get a relatively small decrease in inflation.
• Not so desirable. • Fighting inflation is costly.
29
When the aggregate supply curve is flat
Stabilization Policy with a Steep Aggregate Supply Curve
30
Pric
e Le
vel
0
Real GDP
6,1006,000
S
S D0
D0
100
E110
D1
D1
A
(a) Expansionary policy
Pric
e Le
vel
0
Real GDP
5,900 6,000
S
S D0
D0
100
E
90
D2
D2
B
(b) Contractionary policy
Rise inoutput
Rise in price
Fall in price
Fall in output
When the aggregate supply curve is steep
• Expansionary policy leads to a substantial increase in inflation with only a small increase in real GDP
• This is not desirable• Expansionary policy is costly in terms of inflation
• Contractionary policy leads to a large decrease in inflation with only a small decrease in real GDP
• This is desirable. The cost of bringing down inflation is relatively small.
31
The Shape of the AS Curve: Flat or Steep
• So is AS flat or steep?• Depends on the time frame• Short run – flat aggregate supply
• Fluctuations in aggregate demand have large effects on output and minor effects on prices
• Long run – steep aggregate supply • Fluctuations in aggregate demand have large effects
on prices and minor effects on output• A change in AD will have most of its affect on output in
the SR but on prices in the LR
32
Should the Government Intervene at All?
• Main issue• Can government policy successfully stabilize the
economy?• Or do well-intentioned efforts do more harm than good
• Politics and Philosophy: Conservative vs. Liberal views• Conservatives favor hands off government and favor
fixed rules• Liberals more favorably disposed toward an activist
stabilization policy
33
Should the Government Intervene at All?
• Critics of stabilization policy • Lags and uncertainties - fiscal and
monetary policies. All the stuff we have talked about.
• Skeptical about our ability to forecast the future – most forecast are wrong.
• Stabilization policy may fail• Advise: passive policies
34
Should the Government Intervene?
• Advocates of active stabilization policies• Perfection is unattainable• Economy may not self-correct quickly. • Advocate active policies: use of G, T
changes in the money supply to keep the economy close to full employment.
35
Should the Government Intervene?
• Lags and the Rules-versus-Discretion Debate
• Problem with lags• Attempts at stabilizing the economy may
actually do more harm than good by destabilizing the economy.
36
A Typical Business Cycle
37
Time
Act
ual a
nd P
oten
tial G
DP
Potential GDP
Actual GDP
CB
D
E
A
A Typical Business Cycle
38
Time
Act
ual a
nd P
oten
tial G
DP
Potential GDP
Actual GDP
CB
D
E
A
Rules vs. Discretion Debate
• What issues matter when deciding policy course?
• Speed of the economy’s self-correcting mechanism• Is the economy slow to recover, then discretionary policy
may be warranted.• If fast – stay out.
• Length of lags in stabilization policy• Mixed evidence on lag timing, so no conclusion
• Accuracy of economic forecasts• Can economists make good forecast?
39
Rules vs. Discretion Debate
• Size of government • Proper size of government issue separate from rules vs.
discretion debate• Monetary policy neither increase nor decreases size
• Uncertainties caused by government policy• Frequent changes in policy make it difficult to make
rational plans – favors rules• But economic instability also creates problems
40
Dimensions of Rules vs. Discretion Debate
• Political business cycle• Fiscal policy decisions subject to “political
manipulations”• Monetary policy made by the Fed –
apolitical• “Time Inconsistency” problem
41
Examples of Fixed Rules
• Mostly on the monetary side
• Inflation targeting, such as the Bank of England.
• On the fiscal side – automatic stabilizers