The Cult of Scientism and Nikola Tesla’s

8/17/2019 The Cult of Scientism and Nikola Tesla’s

1/26

The Cult of Scientism and Nikola Tesla’s Aether

jay008

Jay's Analysis | June 17, 2014

By: Jay

The Reign of Scientism

I recently watched a BBC dcu!entary titled "#he At!: #he Illusin $ %eality& In (art ), the hst del*es

int the last $ew decades $ +uantu! hysics and !a-es s!e interestin. ad!issins rele*ant t su/ject

!atter I discuss& #he !st si.ni$icant sectin $ the dcu!entary deals with +uantu! electr dyna!ics and

iracs disc*ery $ the e+uatin that de!nstrates anti!atter, and 3eyn!ans $urther cntri/utin t this

idea& 5 sits that sace is nt a *acuu!, /ut instead e6hi/its a ne*erendin. cycle $ ener.y that $lws

in and ut $ e6istence, that is /rrwed $r! the $uture& hile that is a c!le6 idea, the !ain thrust $ this

essay is nt t seculate n that +uestin&

hat I want t $cus n are the resusitins $ the scientists in*l*ed in the dcu!entary, as well as a

tellin. e6a!le in the $i.ure $ isa %andall, hw this relates t hilshy $ science, and in turn hw this

is directly cnnected t seudscience that is ra.ated /y the usual esta/lish!ent susects, t the

detri!ent $ all& A$ter e6lainin. the usa.e $ the article acceleratr in !easurin. electrns, the hst states

a/ut the 9tan$rd linear acceleratr:

“hen the hysicists !easured electrns in the acceleratr; they .t their $irst cn$ir!atin there !i.ht /e

a deeer set $ rules underinnin. the article ell?ans +uar-s@&For decadespeople were confident that the components of the atomic nucleus – protons and neutrons were

absolutely fundamental& And nw $r the $irst ti!e there was e*idence $ s!ethin. deeer& #he +uar- is a

tric-y and elusi*e /east& #here are si6 -inds $ +uar-s: u, dwn, stran.e, char!ed, t and /tt!& Als,

+uar-s ne*er e6ist in islatin with ther +uar-s& This makes them impossible to see directly !e can only

https://jaysanalysis.com/2014/06/17/the-cult-of-scientism-and-nikola-teslas-aether/http://vimeo.com/75119049http://vimeo.com/75119049http://vimeo.com/75119049http://vimeo.com/75119049http://vimeo.com/75119049http://vimeo.com/75119049http://vimeo.com/75119049https://jaysanalysis.com/2014/06/17/the-cult-of-scientism-and-nikola-teslas-aether/


2/26

infer their presence "espite these ca#eats$ %uarks brought some semblance of order to the particle

&oo In recent years its allwed us t cncct a si!le, yet wer$ul descritin $ hw the uni*erse is /uilt

u& 'asically e#erything in the uni#erse is made of atoms and is built of %uarks and electrons That’s

it

#he irnies in this state!ent will nt /e lst n re.ular readers& 3r se*eral years nw I ha*e written a.ainst

scientis! and analyranted, nt e*ery "scientist is arty t this cnsiracy, /ut withut a du/t, n ne .raduates t

internatinal r!inence withut assin. the +uali$icatins $ the %yal 9cietys =ly F$$ice $ scienti$ic


3/26

in+uisitin& Gi-la #esla and his classi$ied and cn$iscated wr- is a er$ect e6a!le $ this internatinal

!aterialistH!netarist cntrl /ut !re n that later&

ets cnsider the scienti$ic !ethd itsel$ $urther& #he !ethd states that a thery is sited, e*idence is then

.athered thru.h ri.rus e6eri!entatin, e!irical data is cllected and e6a!ined and then $und t

either cn$ir! r deny the thesis& 9usedly, this entire rcess is "ratinal, and the crr/ratin $ the

"/rute $acts with the thery thus ad*ances -nwled.e, leadin. t s!e a!rhus hu!an r.ress&

#he a..re.ate wr- $ all these scientists *er ti!e is stashed away in s!e science *ault, and in due ti!e,

"we will disc*er all the secrets $ nature and li-ely achie*e s!e $r! $ ratinal utia& #his is the

ular .sel !essa.e $ the .rand $uture "science will r*ide, /ased n the earlier !entined

!ythl.y $ scientis! a/ut histry as a eretual stru..le $ n/le, ratinal indi*iduals a.ainst the

suerstitius reli.ius institutins& A .d e6a!le $ this !ythl.ical narrati*e $ scientis! is isa

%andalls recent /-, Knocking on Heaven’s Door: How Physics and Scientific Thinking Illuminate the

niverse and !odern "orld &

%andall writes in tyical scientistic reresentatin: "@9cience desnt address all !ral issues thu.h it

desnt diswn the! as is s!eti!es alle.ed& Nor does science ask about the reasons for the uni#erse’s

beha#ior or in%uire into the morality of human affairs& #hu.h l.ical thin-in. certainly hels in dealin.with the !dern wrld and s!e scientists tday d search $r hysil.ical /ases $r !ral actins,

sciences urse, /radly sea-in., is nt t resl*e the status $ hu!ans !ral standin.&

#he di*idin. line isnt always recise, and thel.ians can s!eti!es as- scienti$ic +uestins while

scientists !i.ht .et their initial ideas r directins $r! a wrld*iew that insires the!s!eti!es e*en a

reli.ius ne& ?re*er /ecause science is dne /y hu!an /ein.s, intermediate stages during which

scientists are formulating their theories will fre%uently in#ol#e unscientific human instincts such as

faith in the e(istence of answers or emotions about particular beliefs& And needless t say, this wr-s the

ther way arund t: thel.ians can /e .uided /y /ser*atins and a scienti$ic understandin. $ the

wrld&

But these s!eti!es /lurry di*isins dnt eli!inate the distinctins and ulti!ate .als& Science aims for a

predicti#e physical picture that can e(plain how things work The methods and goals of science and

religion are intrinsically different$ while science addressed physical reality$ and religion addressing

psychological or social human desires or needs %andall, .& 4

hile I rec.ni


4/26

The Religion of Scientism

A& 9cience is a uni$ied, central /dy r c!!ittee $ enli.htened, ratinal authritati*e cllecti*e that

inha/its the hallwed halls $ acade!ia, all rertin. the neutral $acts $ e!irical e6erience t c!e t

/jecti*e cnclusins, wh then resent the! !atter$$actly t eers and the u/lic& Gthin. culd /e

$urther $r! the truth& 9cientists are indi*idual hu!ans with desires and wrld*iews and inins li-e the

rest $ usand s!e $ the! ha*e an agenda& 9i!ly dnnin. a la/ cat des nt erase s!enes

resusitins and desires any!re than !e dnnin. an GBA jersey !a-es !e a r$essinal /as-et/all

layer& Certainly scientists shuld stri*e $r /jecti*ity and hu!ans can, in a relati*e sense, /e /jecti*e&

Fur wrld*iews can !atch u t reality and .i*e us real, /jecti*e r$ $ hw the wrld wr-sreal

science& But just /ecause !ass !edia resents t the u/lic s!e "scienti$ic study, n ne shuld accet

that this is s!ehw i!!une t /ein. ra.anda si!ly /ecause it has the title "science& Fne need nly

recall hw $ten the !edia lies a/ut e*erythin. else& 9cience is nt i!!une t this !aniulatin and use&

Let s !any erate under the assu!tin that $undin. and desired results s!ehw desnt deter!ine the

results $ what studies .et $unded and are dneM #his is nt t say all studies are $unded $r a seci$ic

urse, /ut nwadays, al!st e*eryne is $a!iliar with the ractice $ certain !e.acrratins $undin.

studies t achie*e r$ita/le results& Gta/le, $a!us e6a!les $ this include the har!aceutical and >?F

$d industries& 3ailin. t rec.ni


5/26

e6istence& #he reality is, scientists are individuals wh d wr- in *ery seci$ic $ields these daysthey are

nt a /dy $ elites, unless ne !eans t re$er t the %yal 9ciety and its /dy $ Inner (arty scientistic

cntrllers&

C& #he $irst +ute states that the +uar- was "r*en& %andall states that science, unli-e reli.in, erates in

a real! $ calcula/le, de$ina/le, !easura/le, material realities& It r*ides a #redicta$le model that e%#lains

how the wrld wr-s& =we*er, she says just rir that science does not in&uire into the reasons for the

universe’s $ehavior M Let, !a.ically, science is at the sa!e ti!e nw a/le t "r*e t us entities that are nt

e!irical and un!easura/le, li-e the +uar-M 9, science, which deals in areas that s!eti!es *erla int

ther discilines, is still a clearly de$ina/le real! $ !aterial calculatin nly cncerned with !dels $

hw, and nt why r the reasns $r thin.s& =ad %andall /een re!inded $ the l.ic and hilshy classes

she either $r.t r ne*er t-, she wuld i!!ediately see the nnsense in this clai!& h is she and her

scientistic cult t rclai! that "hyK is nt a le.iti!ate +uestinK At what int des ne ascertain thedistinctin /etween hw s!ethin. wr-s and why it wr-sK It is /eynd a/surd t say that science is nt

cncerned with reasns $r the uni*erses /eha*ir, when that is the whle reasn science ca!e a/utM

#hese cult !e!/ers si!ly assu!e there is a clear di*ide /etween hw s!ethin. wr-s and the reasn

s!ethin. wr-s&

Scientism’s )resuppositions "ismantled

Cnsider s!e si!le e6a!les that shw %andalls $alse di*ide t /e nnsense, and !erely an ad hoc

resusitin $ her !aterialistic e!iricis!&

1& How is a chilia.n a !athe!atical reality, when it cannt /e e!irically /ser*ed in all its an.lesK Is

it there$re irratinal t /elie*e in a chilia.n r any ther !athe!atical entity that cannt /e

e!irically /ser*edK I$ the resnse is that they are "!athe!atically in$erred, hw are +uar-s, that

cannt /e e!irically seen, /ut nly "!athe!atically in$erred, di$$erent $r! any ther

!etahysical clai!, li-e >d r uni*ersals, which cannt /e e!irically *eri$ied, /ut can /e

!athe!atically in$erredK =w is iracs e+uatin a/ut anti!atter nt als !etahysicalK #hey

/*iusly are nt di$$erent&

2& How des l.ic wr- in the wrld, when logic itself is nt /ser*ed, .i*en that yu resuse l.ic

in the scienti$ic !ethdK Fn what .runds, .i*en yu are a !athe!atician, d yu ar/itrarily say

when a !athe!atical cncet is "scienti$ic r "!etahysical and unscienti$icK

)& Can yu .i*e an e6lanatin $r how the scienti$ic !ethd itself wr-s, since all thin.s in that

!ethd are sused t $all under the cate.ry $ ratinal, hu!an !dels $ how, and ne*er whyK


6/26

4& How d we ratinally /elie*e in the e6istence $ the ast, .i*en that the ast is i!ssi/le t /ser*e

i!!ediately, e!iricallyK #he sa!e alies t the sel$, as well as identity *er ti!e, r t the

rincile $ inductin& Gw isa, /e$re yu say that is a +uestin $ !etahysics and nt science,

hw d yu a.ain delineate which is whichK hy is a +uestin a/ut the ast and time suddenly nt

the ur*iew $ scienceK Is ti!e nt an inte.ral +uestin $ hysics and theretical hysicsK hat

!easura/le, calcula/le eridic ta/le $ rsitins tells yu which is whichK

& #here are lin.uistic scientists and hilshers that study lan.ua.e and se!itics& At what int is

lan.ua.e and its cncetual ssi/ilities, as well as the +uestins $ neurlin.uistics, "science, and

nt !etahysics r eiste!l.yK By yur wn de$initin $ science, lin.uistics culd nly /e

"scienti$ically studied as it relates t e!irical *eri$icatin, yet e!irical *eri$icatin i!!ediately

raises a hst $ eiste!ic +uestins that relate t lin.uistics and eiste!l.y& 9ince the lines are

$u


7/26

But shulds and u.hts are the real! $ ethics the /ranch $ hilshy nt readily aarent under isas

electrn !icrsce& I$ there are n *alue jud.!ents, then there is n $rce $ ought /ehind the scienti$ic

clai!s& I$ *alue jud.!ents are real and truth is real, then there is a $rce $ wer which i!els !e t adhere

t the crrect cnclusins& uite /*iusly, the uni*ersal alicatin $ l.ic resuses #ruth with a

caitl #&

In ther wrds, any ti!e "r.ress is in*-ed, r scienti$ic "ad*ance, etc&, all such ter!s resuse the

.radatins $ *alue n s!e scale that is nt i!!ediately resent t the scienti$ic thery r e6eri!ent, and

these cate.ries !ust hld uni*ersally& "9ciences rinciles in China are the sa!e at 9tan$rd, ri.htK #he

Ga


8/26

ell let yu -nw when we disc*er !aterial r$ $ the i!!aterial& Ontil then, shut u and /elie*e what

we say&

I$ all reality is nly ne tye $ thin., and thus /uilt u t hi.her le*el c!le6ity, it $llws that distinctin

and articularity are ulti!ately illusry& ?aterialis! is the resused .al and tels at the sa!e ti!e&

Fnly /ecause they ha*e the resusitin $ !aterialis! and there$re want !aterialis! t /e true, wuldthey $lishly thin- that /y di..in. ne le*el deeer wuld they /e a/le t achie*e the .al $ !nis!& I$

they had read their hilshy, they wuld -nw nu!erus hilshers ha*e already ad*anced se*eral

$r!s $ !nis!, all $ which lead t dead ends and cancel ut science and -nwled.e&

I$ all reality is nly ne tye $ thin., then it is i!ssi/le t accunt $r distinctin& =w a! I distinct $r!

the !icrsceK 3r! isa %andallK 3r s!e, $li.ht int eastern reli.ins which are already /ased arund

!nis! is a ular ath& But that !eans the .reat ratinalist athway $ 5nli.hten!ent e!iricis! is a

$raud and a sha!& 5astern reli.ins are ulti!ately al.ical and irratinal, $ten deridin. l.ic and scienti$ic

!ethd& And they are s all /ecause $ /asic hilshical resusitins $ !nis! r dualis!& It shuld

/e nted that !nis! and dualis! are !erely $li sides $ the sa!e cin and either as a $undatinal

resusitin can trans$r! int the ther, cancellin. ut all ratinality, de*l*in. int incherence&

=w a/surd it is $r these scientists t deride hilshy, while the innacle $ their research in +uantu!

!echanics /rin.s the! t the *ery thin.s hilshers ha*e already dealt with $r !illennia& hat

resu!tin and arr.ance n their art, nt reali


9/26

+ualities& #here$re the way =is e6istence is -nwn r ar.ued $r is nt dne the sa!e way ther !aterial

/jects are *eri$ied&

# de!and this tye $ r$ $r an i!!aterial Bein. is li-e de!andin. the laws $ l.ic are irratinal t

/elie*e in until they are "seen& But li-e a nu!/er r in$inity, /y de$initin they are nt /jects which are

-nwn e!irically& As I as-ed isa %andall a/*e, is it irratinal t /elie*e in a chilia.n /ecause they

cannt /e i!!ediately sensedK F$ curse nt& Is it irratinal t /elie*e in the +uar-K Gt accrdin. t their

e6eri!ents, /y which the !ath nly infers their e6istence, while the +uar- itsel$ is ne*er directly /ser*edM

Is it irratinal t /elie*e in the ast, since it is nt i!!ediately the /ject $ ercetinK F$ curse nt, yet

!st atheistic !aterialists /elie*e it is nly ratinal t /elie*e in the ast, chilia.ns, etc&

It /ec!es clear that the entire enterrise $ scientistic e!iricis! is thus wei.hted and .a!ed t nly

cnsider e*idences and r$s that $it a redeter!ined cate.ry $ ssi/le e6istence& It is li-e sayin., "Fnly

!aterial thin.s e6ist, and $r !e t accet that an i!!aterial >d e6ists, =e !ust /e !aterial& But i$ they

are allwed t ri. the e*idence $r! the utset, we arent truly en.a.in. in science and $ree in+uiry, /ut in

d.!atis! and ra.anda, and it is a d.!atis! intent n r!tin. a crilin., $alse wrld*iew that

i!risns !an !aterialis!& It wuld /e li-e a cri!e la/ sayin., "9ince nly !ales c!!it cri!es, we can

de$initi*ely rule ut any e*idence a.ainst $e!ale susects, /ecause nly !ales c!!it cri!es&

Tesla and Aether as the Solution

In cntrast, cnsider s!ene wh is a !del scientist& Gi-la #esla did nt cater t the whi!s $ the

re*ailin. inins $ his day& =e was a !an $ learnin. wh allwed truth t ta-e hi! where it led& #he

!eans $ his a!a


10/26

eclassi$ied dcu!ent 1 shwin. #eslas wr- was classi$ied& Clic- t enlar.e&

But what were the hilshical and esteric resusitins $ #eslaK #esla did nt /elie*e in the!aterialistic reductinis! $ the !dern scalled lu!inaries $ science, and the !any weather !di$icatin

and war$are r.ra!s /ased arund #eslas wr- de!nstrate that he had clearly /een n the ri.ht trac-& In

ther wrds, nly a aradi.! that was far more correct than the !dern !ass cnsu!tin, deadend

hysics tau.ht in esta/lish!ent acade!ia culd rduce the cnsistent, crssdisciline results #esla

achie*ed& Fne such $eature that stands ut is the idea $ the aether, which see!s t anticiate the ideas that

irac and thers wuld rse in re.ard t latent ener.y e*erywhere, includin. scalled "e!ty sace&

3r! a hilshical ersecti*e, aether !a-es er$ect sense, t, as it resl*es !any hilshical

r/le!s, such as the e6istence $ an ideatinal real!, i$ yu will& l$.an. (auli had rsed si!ilar

ideas, t, it shuld /e added, !a-in. a direct cnnect /etween the real! $ syche r !ind, and the /jects

$ the e6ternal "hysical wrld&

eclassi$ied dcu!ent 2 shwin. #eslas wr- was cn$iscated& Clic- t enlar.e&

“urin. the succeedin. tw years 18P) and 18P4; $ intense cncentratin I was $rtunate enu.h t !a-e

tw $arreachin. disc*eries& #he $irst was a dyna!ic thery $ .ra*ity, which I ha*e wr-ed ut in all

details and he t .i*e t the wrld *ery sn& It e6lains the causes $ this $rce and the !tins $hea*enly /dies under its in$luence s satis$actrily that it will ut an end t idleseculatin and $alse

cncetins, as that $ cur*ed sace&


11/26

Fnly the e6istence $ a $ield $ $rce can accunt $r the !tins $ the /dies as /ser*ed, and its

assu!tin disenses with sace cur*ature& All literature n this su/ject is $utile and destined t /li*in& So

are all attempts to e(plain the workings of the uni#erse without recogni&ing the e(istence of the aether

and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena&

?y secnd disc*ery was $ a hysical truth $ the .reatest i!rtance& As I ha*e searched the entire

scienti$ic recrds in !re than a hal$dra*ity which assu!ed a $ield $ $rce which accunts $r the !tins $ /dies in saceQ assu!tin $ this $ield $ $rce disenses with the cncet $ sace cur*ature a la

5insteinQ the aether has an indisensa/le $unctin in the hen!ena $ uni*ersal .ra*ity, inertia,

!!entu!, and !*e!ent $ hea*enly /dies, as well as all at!ic and !lecular !atterQ and,

2& 5n*irn!ental 5ner.y the isc*ery $ a new hysical #ruth: there is n ener.y in !atter ther than

that recei*ed $r! the en*irn!ent& yne, (ccult )ether Physics

Anther dcu!ent shwin. the sa!e, /ut hi.hli.htin. the intelli.ence esta/lish!ent and Ga*al usa.e $

#eslas wr-& Clic- t enlar.e&


12/26

"I$ the ter! "ener.y is nly a cn*enient a/stractin, then it des nt e6ist in hysical $r!, and really

descri/es the tential t er$r! wr- as a /yrduct $ !atter and electr!a.netic radiatin in eretual

!tin, s!e $ the $rce $ which has /een di*erted thru.h a ath where it er$r!s the desired wr-, as

it .es n its !erry way thru.h the uni*erse& 5*ery chan.e $ $r! $ either !atter r radiatin in*l*es

the "wr- which induces the chan.e, r the "wr- which is induced /y the chan.e& ithut wr- there is

n chan.e, /ut all wr- is ulti!ately the rduct $ the uni*erse in eretual, sel$sustainin. !tin, as a

rule and nt an e6cetin& I/id&

And,

"here the .*ern!ent has stlen his aers, we !ust search $r !eanin. elsewhere& In an article, "?ans

>reatest Achie*e!ent, #esla utlined his yna!ic #hery $ >ra*ity in etic $r! as arahrased /y

!e:

#here are curius arallels /etween what #esla says a/ut aether and what the recent disc*eries $ +uantu!

electrdyna!ics de!nstrates& #he i!licatins $ this are tre!endus& I$ #esla was n the ri.ht trac-, then

!st $ the !dern scientistic resusitins and wr- has t /e tssed ut as useless, li-e #esla says& It

!eans the ancient wrld, and thin-ers li-e (lat, wh sited aether, ha*e !uch !re t teach us than

arr.ant !dernity assu!es& %ertedly, accrdin. t the acceleratr e6eri!ents, there is another* deeerle*el $ reality where nr!al articles see! t erate in an uncn*entinal way& Althu.h 5instein, and a

hst $ ther !dern lu!inaries wa*ered n aether, it has nt /een re$uted r cnclusi*ely disr*en& It is

s!ethin. suressed&

In $act, the disc*ery $ an ener.etic le*el $ reality where the e6istence $ ener.y nt i!!ediately *isi/le

and nly in$erred /ased n its si.nature, sunds just li-e the -inds $ clai!s #esla !ade& 5*en isa

%andalls "ar#ed Passages ar.ues that the e6istence $ ther di!ensins is !athe!atically crrect, /ut we

!ust re!ain unsure $ their e6istence /ecause they ha*e nt /een e!irically *eri$ied& I$ thats the case,

then +uar-s als $ail t li*e u t that re+uire!ent& And nt nly that, /ut the scienti$ic !ethd itsel$ re!ains

a !ysterius tl with n justi$icatin $r its wn cnsistency r cherency& #he reality is, there are $ar !re

than a $ew thin.s these scientists rely n that cannt /e e!irically *eri$ied than just +uar-s r !athe!atics&But #esla is nt s!ene rthd6, /ecause he was a $an $ all -inds $ esteric ideas and runs cntrary t

the !aterialist cartel& 5*en thu.h he was clearly n the ri.ht trac- and his disc*eries are the /asis $

cuntless $r!s $ technl.y that actually wr- in the real wrld, he cannt /e tau.ht in schls /ecause he

was nt a scientistic due& 9cience is the search $r -nwled.e and truth a/ut the wrld& 9cientis! is the

/elie$ syste! that the scienti$ic !ethd is the nly way $ arri*in. at an ar6i!atin $ r/a/ilistic

-nwled.e, and that wea- $r! $ -nwled.e is the nly -nwled.e we can clai! t ha*e&

I dnt want t /e !isunderstd: the scienti$ic !ethd is a .reat tl $r arri*in. at -nwled.e a/ut the

natural wrld& It des .et results, /ut it nly .ets results relati*e t the *erall accuracy $ the scientists

wrld*iew& hile it is certainly true that hu!ans can !a-e disc*eries withut all the ri.ht resusitins,

it is the j/ $ the hilsher $ science t l- at the resusitins and !ethds $ science t see i$ thel.ic $ the science /ein. dne is sund& I$ scientists aid !re attentin t hilshers, they !i.ht reali


13/26

I$ scientists were !re en!inded a/ut their !aterialist resusitins, they !i.ht /e !re willin. t

learn $r! !en li-e Gi-la #esla, whse wrld*iew a!a


14/26

By: Jay

The Reign of Scientism

I recently watched a BBC dcu!entary titled "#he At!: #he Illusin $ %eality& In (art ), the hst del*es

int the last $ew decades $ +uantu! hysics and !a-es s!e interestin. ad!issins rele*ant t su/ject

!atter I discuss& #he !st si.ni$icant sectin $ the dcu!entary deals with +uantu! electr dyna!ics and

iracs disc*ery $ the e+uatin that de!nstrates anti!atter, and 3eyn!ans $urther cntri/utin t thisidea& 5 sits that sace is nt a *acuu!, /ut instead e6hi/its a ne*erendin. cycle $ ener.y that $lws

in and ut $ e6istence, that is /rrwed $r! the $uture& hile that is a c!le6 idea, the !ain thrust $ this

essay is nt t seculate n that +uestin&

hat I want t $cus n are the resusitins $ the scientists in*l*ed in the dcu!entary, as well as a

tellin. e6a!le in the $i.ure $ isa %andall, hw this relates t hilshy $ science, and in turn hw this

is directly cnnected t seudscience that is ra.ated /y the usual esta/lish!ent susects, t the

detri!ent $ all& A$ter e6lainin. the usa.e $ the article acceleratr in !easurin. electrns, the hst states

a/ut the 9tan$rd linear acceleratr:

“hen the hysicists !easured electrns in the acceleratr; they .t their $irst cn$ir!atin there !i.ht /e

a deeer set $ rules underinnin. the article ell?ans +uar-s@&For decades

people were confident that the components of the atomic nucleus – protons and neutrons were

absolutely fundamental& And nw $r the $irst ti!e there was e*idence $ s!ethin. deeer& #he +uar- is a

tric-y and elusi*e /east& #here are si6 -inds $ +uar-s: u, dwn, stran.e, char!ed, t and /tt!& Als,

+uar-s ne*er e6ist in islatin with ther +uar-s& This makes them impossible to see directly !e can only

infer their presence "espite these ca#eats$ %uarks brought some semblance of order to the particle

&oo In recent years its allwed us t cncct a si!le, yet wer$ul descritin $ hw the uni*erse is /uilt

u& 'asically e#erything in the uni#erse is made of atoms and is built of %uarks and electrons That’sit

#he irnies in this state!ent will nt /e lst n re.ular readers& 3r se*eral years nw I ha*e written a.ainst

scientis! and analy


15/26

resecti*e $ields $ail t understand due t their secialiranted, nt e*ery "scientist is arty t this cnsiracy, /ut withut a du/t, n ne .raduates t

internatinal r!inence withut assin. the +uali$icatins $ the %yal 9cietys =ly F$$ice $ scienti$ic

in+uisitin& Gi-la #esla and his classi$ied and cn$iscated wr- is a er$ect e6a!le $ this internatinal

!aterialistH!netarist cntrl /ut !re n that later&

ets cnsider the scienti$ic !ethd itsel$ $urther& #he !ethd states that a thery is sited, e*idence is then.athered thru.h ri.rus e6eri!entatin, e!irical data is cllected and e6a!ined and then $und t

either cn$ir! r deny the thesis& 9usedly, this entire rcess is "ratinal, and the crr/ratin $ the

"/rute $acts with the thery thus ad*ances -nwled.e, leadin. t s!e a!rhus hu!an r.ress&


16/26

#he a..re.ate wr- $ all these scientists *er ti!e is stashed away in s!e science *ault, and in due ti!e,

"we will disc*er all the secrets $ nature and li-ely achie*e s!e $r! $ ratinal utia& #his is the

ular .sel !essa.e $ the .rand $uture "science will r*ide, /ased n the earlier !entined

!ythl.y $ scientis! a/ut histry as a eretual stru..le $ n/le, ratinal indi*iduals a.ainst the

suerstitius reli.ius institutins& A .d e6a!le $ this !ythl.ical narrati*e $ scientis! is isa

%andalls recent /-, Knocking on Heaven’s Door: How Physics and Scientific Thinking Illuminate the

niverse and !odern "orld &

%andall writes in tyical scientistic reresentatin: "@9cience desnt address all !ral issues thu.h it

desnt diswn the! as is s!eti!es alle.ed& Nor does science ask about the reasons for the uni#erse’s

beha#ior or in%uire into the morality of human affairs& #hu.h l.ical thin-in. certainly hels in dealin.

with the !dern wrld and s!e scientists tday d search $r hysil.ical /ases $r !ral actins,

sciences urse, /radly sea-in., is nt t resl*e the status $ hu!ans !ral standin.&

#he di*idin. line isnt always recise, and thel.ians can s!eti!es as- scienti$ic +uestins while

scientists !i.ht .et their initial ideas r directins $r! a wrld*iew that insires the!s!eti!es e*en a

reli.ius ne& ?re*er /ecause science is dne /y hu!an /ein.s, intermediate stages during which

scientists are formulating their theories will fre%uently in#ol#e unscientific human instincts such as

faith in the e(istence of answers or emotions about particular beliefs& And needless t say, this wr-s thether way arund t: thel.ians can /e .uided /y /ser*atins and a scienti$ic understandin. $ the

wrld&

But these s!eti!es /lurry di*isins dnt eli!inate the distinctins and ulti!ate .als& Science aims for a

predicti#e physical picture that can e(plain how things work The methods and goals of science and

religion are intrinsically different$ while science addressed physical reality$ and religion addressing

psychological or social human desires or needs %andall, .& 4

hile I rec.ni


17/26

A& 9cience is a uni$ied, central /dy r c!!ittee $ enli.htened, ratinal authritati*e cllecti*e that

inha/its the hallwed halls $ acade!ia, all rertin. the neutral $acts $ e!irical e6erience t c!e t

/jecti*e cnclusins, wh then resent the! !atter$$actly t eers and the u/lic& Gthin. culd /e

$urther $r! the truth& 9cientists are indi*idual hu!ans with desires and wrld*iews and inins li-e the

rest $ usand s!e $ the! ha*e an agenda& 9i!ly dnnin. a la/ cat des nt erase s!enes

resusitins and desires any!re than !e dnnin. an GBA jersey !a-es !e a r$essinal /as-et/all

layer& Certainly scientists shuld stri*e $r /jecti*ity and hu!ans can, in a relati*e sense, /e /jecti*e&

Fur wrld*iews can !atch u t reality and .i*e us real, /jecti*e r$ $ hw the wrld wr-sreal

science& But just /ecause !ass !edia resents t the u/lic s!e "scienti$ic study, n ne shuld accet

that this is s!ehw i!!une t /ein. ra.anda si!ly /ecause it has the title "science& Fne need nly

recall hw $ten the !edia lies a/ut e*erythin. else& 9cience is nt i!!une t this !aniulatin and use&

Let s !any erate under the assu!tin that $undin. and desired results s!ehw desnt deter!ine the

results $ what studies .et $unded and are dneM #his is nt t say all studies are $unded $r a seci$ic

urse, /ut nwadays, al!st e*eryne is $a!iliar with the ractice $ certain !e.acrratins $undin.

studies t achie*e r$ita/le results& Gta/le, $a!us e6a!les $ this include the har!aceutical and >?F

$d industries& 3ailin. t rec.ni


18/26

C& #he $irst +ute states that the +uar- was "r*en& %andall states that science, unli-e reli.in, erates in

a real! $ calcula/le, de$ina/le, !easura/le, material realities& It r*ides a #redicta$le model that e%#lainshow the wrld wr-s& =we*er, she says just rir that science does not in&uire into the reasons for the

universe’s $ehavior M Let, !a.ically, science is at the sa!e ti!e nw a/le t "r*e t us entities that are nt

e!irical and un!easura/le, li-e the +uar-M 9, science, which deals in areas that s!eti!es *erla int

ther discilines, is still a clearly de$ina/le real! $ !aterial calculatin nly cncerned with !dels $

hw, and nt why r the reasns $r thin.s& =ad %andall /een re!inded $ the l.ic and hilshy classes

she either $r.t r ne*er t-, she wuld i!!ediately see the nnsense in this clai!& h is she and her

scientistic cult t rclai! that "hyK is nt a le.iti!ate +uestinK At what int des ne ascertain the

distinctin /etween hw s!ethin. wr-s and why it wr-sK It is /eynd a/surd t say that science is nt

cncerned with reasns $r the uni*erses /eha*ir, when that is the whle reasn science ca!e a/utM

#hese cult !e!/ers si!ly assu!e there is a clear di*ide /etween hw s!ethin. wr-s and the reasn

s!ethin. wr-s&

Scientism’s )resuppositions "ismantled

Cnsider s!e si!le e6a!les that shw %andalls $alse di*ide t /e nnsense, and !erely an ad hoc

resusitin $ her !aterialistic e!iricis!&

1& How is a chilia.n a !athe!atical reality, when it cannt /e e!irically /ser*ed in all its an.lesK Is

it there$re irratinal t /elie*e in a chilia.n r any ther !athe!atical entity that cannt /e

e!irically /ser*edK I$ the resnse is that they are "!athe!atically in$erred, hw are +uar-s, that

cannt /e e!irically seen, /ut nly "!athe!atically in$erred, di$$erent $r! any ther

!etahysical clai!, li-e >d r uni*ersals, which cannt /e e!irically *eri$ied, /ut can /e

!athe!atically in$erredK =w is iracs e+uatin a/ut anti!atter nt als !etahysicalK #hey

/*iusly are nt di$$erent&

2& How des l.ic wr- in the wrld, when logic itself is nt /ser*ed, .i*en that yu resuse l.ic

in the scienti$ic !ethdK Fn what .runds, .i*en yu are a !athe!atician, d yu ar/itrarily say

when a !athe!atical cncet is "scienti$ic r "!etahysical and unscienti$icK

)& Can yu .i*e an e6lanatin $r how the scienti$ic !ethd itself wr-s, since all thin.s in that

!ethd are sused t $all under the cate.ry $ ratinal, hu!an !dels $ how, and ne*er whyK

4& How d we ratinally /elie*e in the e6istence $ the ast, .i*en that the ast is i!ssi/le t /ser*e

i!!ediately, e!iricallyK #he sa!e alies t the sel$, as well as identity *er ti!e, r t the

rincile $ inductin& Gw isa, /e$re yu say that is a +uestin $ !etahysics and nt science,

hw d yu a.ain delineate which is whichK hy is a +uestin a/ut the ast and time suddenly nt


19/26

the ur*iew $ scienceK Is ti!e nt an inte.ral +uestin $ hysics and theretical hysicsK hat

!easura/le, calcula/le eridic ta/le $ rsitins tells yu which is whichK

& #here are lin.uistic scientists and hilshers that study lan.ua.e and se!itics& At what int is

lan.ua.e and its cncetual ssi/ilities, as well as the +uestins $ neurlin.uistics, "science, and

nt !etahysics r eiste!l.yK By yur wn de$initin $ science, lin.uistics culd nly /e

"scienti$ically studied as it relates t e!irical *eri$icatin, yet e!irical *eri$icatin i!!ediately

raises a hst $ eiste!ic +uestins that relate t lin.uistics and eiste!l.y& 9ince the lines are

$u


20/26

t the crrect cnclusins& uite /*iusly, the uni*ersal alicatin $ l.ic resuses #ruth with a

caitl #&

In ther wrds, any ti!e "r.ress is in*-ed, r scienti$ic "ad*ance, etc&, all such ter!s resuse the

.radatins $ *alue n s!e scale that is nt i!!ediately resent t the scienti$ic thery r e6eri!ent, and

these cate.ries !ust hld uni*ersally& "9ciences rinciles in China are the sa!e at 9tan$rd, ri.htK #he

Ga


21/26

ell let yu -nw when we disc*er !aterial r$ $ the i!!aterial& Ontil then, shut u and /elie*e what

we say&

I$ all reality is nly ne tye $ thin., and thus /uilt u t hi.her le*el c!le6ity, it $llws that distinctin

and articularity are ulti!ately illusry& ?aterialis! is the resused .al and tels at the sa!e ti!e&

Fnly /ecause they ha*e the resusitin $ !aterialis! and there$re want !aterialis! t /e true, wuldthey $lishly thin- that /y di..in. ne le*el deeer wuld they /e a/le t achie*e the .al $ !nis!& I$

they had read their hilshy, they wuld -nw nu!erus hilshers ha*e already ad*anced se*eral

$r!s $ !nis!, all $ which lead t dead ends and cancel ut science and -nwled.e&

I$ all reality is nly ne tye $ thin., then it is i!ssi/le t accunt $r distinctin& =w a! I distinct $r!

the !icrsceK 3r! isa %andallK 3r s!e, $li.ht int eastern reli.ins which are already /ased arund

!nis! is a ular ath& But that !eans the .reat ratinalist athway $ 5nli.hten!ent e!iricis! is a

$raud and a sha!& 5astern reli.ins are ulti!ately al.ical and irratinal, $ten deridin. l.ic and scienti$ic

!ethd& And they are s all /ecause $ /asic hilshical resusitins $ !nis! r dualis!& It shuld

/e nted that !nis! and dualis! are !erely $li sides $ the sa!e cin and either as a $undatinal

resusitin can trans$r! int the ther, cancellin. ut all ratinality, de*l*in. int incherence&

=w a/surd it is $r these scientists t deride hilshy, while the innacle $ their research in +uantu!

!echanics /rin.s the! t the *ery thin.s hilshers ha*e already dealt with $r !illennia& hat

resu!tin and arr.ance n their art, nt reali


22/26

+ualities& #here$re the way =is e6istence is -nwn r ar.ued $r is nt dne the sa!e way ther !aterial

/jects are *eri$ied&

# de!and this tye $ r$ $r an i!!aterial Bein. is li-e de!andin. the laws $ l.ic are irratinal t

/elie*e in until they are "seen& But li-e a nu!/er r in$inity, /y de$initin they are nt /jects which are

-nwn e!irically& As I as-ed isa %andall a/*e, is it irratinal t /elie*e in a chilia.n /ecause they

cannt /e i!!ediately sensedK F$ curse nt& Is it irratinal t /elie*e in the +uar-K Gt accrdin. t their

e6eri!ents, /y which the !ath nly infers their e6istence, while the +uar- itsel$ is ne*er directly /ser*edM

Is it irratinal t /elie*e in the ast, since it is nt i!!ediately the /ject $ ercetinK F$ curse nt, yet

!st atheistic !aterialists /elie*e it is nly ratinal t /elie*e in the ast, chilia.ns, etc&

It /ec!es clear that the entire enterrise $ scientistic e!iricis! is thus wei.hted and .a!ed t nly

cnsider e*idences and r$s that $it a redeter!ined cate.ry $ ssi/le e6istence& It is li-e sayin., "Fnly

!aterial thin.s e6ist, and $r !e t accet that an i!!aterial >d e6ists, =e !ust /e !aterial& But i$ they

are allwed t ri. the e*idence $r! the utset, we arent truly en.a.in. in science and $ree in+uiry, /ut in

d.!atis! and ra.anda, and it is a d.!atis! intent n r!tin. a crilin., $alse wrld*iew that

i!risns !an !aterialis!& It wuld /e li-e a cri!e la/ sayin., "9ince nly !ales c!!it cri!es, we can

de$initi*ely rule ut any e*idence a.ainst $e!ale susects, /ecause nly !ales c!!it cri!es&

Tesla and Aether as the Solution

In cntrast, cnsider s!ene wh is a !del scientist& Gi-la #esla did nt cater t the whi!s $ the

re*ailin. inins $ his day& =e was a !an $ learnin. wh allwed truth t ta-e hi! where it led& #he

!eans $ his a!a


23/26

eclassi$ied dcu!ent 1 shwin. #eslas wr- was classi$ied& Clic- t enlar.e&

But what were the hilshical and esteric resusitins $ #eslaK #esla did nt /elie*e in the!aterialistic reductinis! $ the !dern scalled lu!inaries $ science, and the !any weather !di$icatin

and war$are r.ra!s /ased arund #eslas wr- de!nstrate that he had clearly /een n the ri.ht trac-& In

ther wrds, nly a aradi.! that was far more correct than the !dern !ass cnsu!tin, deadend

hysics tau.ht in esta/lish!ent acade!ia culd rduce the cnsistent, crssdisciline results #esla

achie*ed& Fne such $eature that stands ut is the idea $ the aether, which see!s t anticiate the ideas that

irac and thers wuld rse in re.ard t latent ener.y e*erywhere, includin. scalled "e!ty sace&

3r! a hilshical ersecti*e, aether !a-es er$ect sense, t, as it resl*es !any hilshical

r/le!s, such as the e6istence $ an ideatinal real!, i$ yu will& l$.an. (auli had rsed si!ilar

ideas, t, it shuld /e added, !a-in. a direct cnnect /etween the real! $ syche r !ind, and the /jects

$ the e6ternal "hysical wrld&

eclassi$ied dcu!ent 2 shwin. #eslas wr- was cn$iscated& Clic- t enlar.e&

“urin. the succeedin. tw years 18P) and 18P4; $ intense cncentratin I was $rtunate enu.h t !a-e

tw $arreachin. disc*eries& #he $irst was a dyna!ic thery $ .ra*ity, which I ha*e wr-ed ut in all

details and he t .i*e t the wrld *ery sn& It e6lains the causes $ this $rce and the !tins $hea*enly /dies under its in$luence s satis$actrily that it will ut an end t idleseculatin and $alse

cncetins, as that $ cur*ed sace&


24/26

Fnly the e6istence $ a $ield $ $rce can accunt $r the !tins $ the /dies as /ser*ed, and its

assu!tin disenses with sace cur*ature& All literature n this su/ject is $utile and destined t /li*in& So

are all attempts to e(plain the workings of the uni#erse without recogni&ing the e(istence of the aether

and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena&

?y secnd disc*ery was $ a hysical truth $ the .reatest i!rtance& As I ha*e searched the entire

scienti$ic recrds in !re than a hal$dra*ity which assu!ed a $ield $ $rce which accunts $r the !tins $ /dies in saceQ assu!tin $ this $ield $ $rce disenses with the cncet $ sace cur*ature a la

5insteinQ the aether has an indisensa/le $unctin in the hen!ena $ uni*ersal .ra*ity, inertia,

!!entu!, and !*e!ent $ hea*enly /dies, as well as all at!ic and !lecular !atterQ and,

2& 5n*irn!ental 5ner.y the isc*ery $ a new hysical #ruth: there is n ener.y in !atter ther than

that recei*ed $r! the en*irn!ent& yne, (ccult )ether Physics

Anther dcu!ent shwin. the sa!e, /ut hi.hli.htin. the intelli.ence esta/lish!ent and Ga*al usa.e $

#eslas wr-& Clic- t enlar.e&


25/26

"I$ the ter! "ener.y is nly a cn*enient a/stractin, then it des nt e6ist in hysical $r!, and really

descri/es the tential t er$r! wr- as a /yrduct $ !atter and electr!a.netic radiatin in eretual

!tin, s!e $ the $rce $ which has /een di*erted thru.h a ath where it er$r!s the desired wr-, as

it .es n its !erry way thru.h the uni*erse& 5*ery chan.e $ $r! $ either !atter r radiatin in*l*es

the "wr- which induces the chan.e, r the "wr- which is induced /y the chan.e& ithut wr- there is

n chan.e, /ut all wr- is ulti!ately the rduct $ the uni*erse in eretual, sel$sustainin. !tin, as a

rule and nt an e6cetin& I/id&

And,

"here the .*ern!ent has stlen his aers, we !ust search $r !eanin. elsewhere& In an article, "?ans

>reatest Achie*e!ent, #esla utlined his yna!ic #hery $ >ra*ity in etic $r! as arahrased /y

!e:

#here are curius arallels /etween what #esla says a/ut aether and what the recent disc*eries $ +uantu!

electrdyna!ics de!nstrates& #he i!licatins $ this are tre!endus& I$ #esla was n the ri.ht trac-, then

!st $ the !dern scientistic resusitins and wr- has t /e tssed ut as useless, li-e #esla says& It

!eans the ancient wrld, and thin-ers li-e (lat, wh sited aether, ha*e !uch !re t teach us than

arr.ant !dernity assu!es& %ertedly, accrdin. t the acceleratr e6eri!ents, there is another* deeerle*el $ reality where nr!al articles see! t erate in an uncn*entinal way& Althu.h 5instein, and a

hst $ ther !dern lu!inaries wa*ered n aether, it has nt /een re$uted r cnclusi*ely disr*en& It is

s!ethin. suressed&

In $act, the disc*ery $ an ener.etic le*el $ reality where the e6istence $ ener.y nt i!!ediately *isi/le

and nly in$erred /ased n its si.nature, sunds just li-e the -inds $ clai!s #esla !ade& 5*en isa

%andalls "ar#ed Passages ar.ues that the e6istence $ ther di!ensins is !athe!atically crrect, /ut we

!ust re!ain unsure $ their e6istence /ecause they ha*e nt /een e!irically *eri$ied& I$ thats the case,

then +uar-s als $ail t li*e u t that re+uire!ent& And nt nly that, /ut the scienti$ic !ethd itsel$ re!ains

a !ysterius tl with n justi$icatin $r its wn cnsistency r cherency& #he reality is, there are $ar !re

than a $ew thin.s these scientists rely n that cannt /e e!irically *eri$ied than just +uar-s r !athe!atics&But #esla is nt s!ene rthd6, /ecause he was a $an $ all -inds $ esteric ideas and runs cntrary t

the !aterialist cartel& 5*en thu.h he was clearly n the ri.ht trac- and his disc*eries are the /asis $

cuntless $r!s $ technl.y that actually wr- in the real wrld, he cannt /e tau.ht in schls /ecause he

was nt a scientistic due& 9cience is the search $r -nwled.e and truth a/ut the wrld& 9cientis! is the

/elie$ syste! that the scienti$ic !ethd is the nly way $ arri*in. at an ar6i!atin $ r/a/ilistic

-nwled.e, and that wea- $r! $ -nwled.e is the nly -nwled.e we can clai! t ha*e&

I dnt want t /e !isunderstd: the scienti$ic !ethd is a .reat tl $r arri*in. at -nwled.e a/ut the

natural wrld& It des .et results, /ut it nly .ets results relati*e t the *erall accuracy $ the scientists

wrld*iew& hile it is certainly true that hu!ans can !a-e disc*eries withut all the ri.ht resusitins,

it is the j/ $ the hilsher $ science t l- at the resusitins and !ethds $ science t see i$ thel.ic $ the science /ein. dne is sund& I$ scientists aid !re attentin t hilshers, they !i.ht reali


26/26

I$ scientists were !re en!inded a/ut their !aterialist resusitins, they !i.ht /e !re willin. t

learn $r! !en li-e Gi-la #esla, whse wrld*iew a!a

Documents

The Cult of Scientism and Nikola Tesla’s