Upload
dr-w-allen-huckabee
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
1/28
The Corporation 1
The Corporation: Is it a Key to Poverty?
William Huckabee
OM7050
Ethics and Social Responsibility
September 11, 2009
Capella University
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
2/28
The Corporation 2
The Corporation: Is it a Key to Poverty?
In the light of the current global recession, readers see the results in massive
layoffs as businesses try to reduce costs and conserve capital. When costs cannot be
controlled, businesses close their doors. These events results in thousands being
displaced and turn to social programs for assistance. In the face of layoffs and closures
however, government institutions are seeing a decline in tax revenues and are forced to
reduce their spending; this places the welfare programs citizens need in jeopardy. This
suggests that global poverty levels will increase, creating larger burdens on the already
stressed social systems to meet the needs of this population.
The Realities of Poverty
Poverty is probably one the greatest challenges that the international economies
will ever face (Leisinger, 2007). It is suggested that 80% of the worlds population lives
on less than $10.00 per day (Shau, 2009, para. 1). Shau suggests that the international
poverty line is somewhere around $1.00 per day (para. 7). This figure is much different
in the United States. For instance, Cava and Mayer (2007) suggest that the poverty
level in America is around $50.00 per day (p. 266) or $18,860 (Velasquez, 2006, p.
314) annually.
Furthermore, Pogge (2003) suggests that few citizens realize the harm (p. 2)
that poverty is inflicting on the poorer populations of the world and that there are three
times more (p. 2) citizens that live below the poverty line than live above it. Further,
there are between 955 million (p. 2) and 1.3 billion (Leisinger, 2005, p. 578) in this
impoverished group. Unbelievably, the affluent members of the world believe that they
are entitled to 81% (Pogge, p. 2) of the worlds product.
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
3/28
The Corporation 3
Further, people in the richest countries tend to downplay the severity and
persistence (Pogge, 2003, p. 1) of global poverty. In fact, this population believes that
poverty can be eradicated with an occasional donation to the Salvation Army, for
example (Pogge). One could postulate that poverty is a product of, and is being fueled
by misrule and poor leadership (p. 7) creating economic injustices, which is not
congruent with to a thriving society. Mofid (2003) suggests that economic justice is an
important part, and possibly a requirement for, a civilized society and injustices in this
area accounts for much of Global poverty (p. 24).
In contrast, Moyo and Ferguson (2009) suggest that poverty can be created in
part because of geographic or natural resource constraints, such as being land-locked
(p. 31) with no access to rivers or coastlines for example, to move goods to other
nations for trade. Moyo and Ferguson further suggest further that when these two
constraints are not in play, poverty is often a result of ethnic differences.
For example, Collier (as cited in Moyo and Ferguson) suggest that ethnic
differences within the same national boundaries can often affect the economic growth
(p. 32) and stability, regardless of the amount of aid that the county receives. Perhaps
this is because of the absence of a strong and credible (p. 33) government entity to
enforce equity and utility to the group as a whole, versus choosing ethnic sides.
A strong government free of corruption and can be trusted to protect property
rights and the security of contracts (Moyo and Ferguson, 2009, p.41) will be more
congruent for economic growth and the abolishment of poverty. It is governments
responsibility to ensure socioeconomic progress (Leisinger, 2007, p. 114). However,
even if there were a strong and credible government in place, one could postulate that
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
4/28
The Corporation 4
as large as this problem is, no one entity can assume the responsibility for all duties of
society (p. 114). One should consider too that often the government can stifle
economic growth; Moyo and Ferguson all this economic distortion (Moyo and
Ferguson, p. 20).
Moreover, with the continuous struggle to control and reduce poverty, the
evidence suggested above indicates that governmental entities do not have the
resources or capacity to help cure this societal problem (Leisinger, 2007). Therefore,
Leisinger suggests that to rid society of this problem, it will require a coordinated effort
between government, civil society, and business (p. 113) to achieve a sustainable
decline in poverty.
Is Leisingers (2007) proposition the solution to poverty? Friedman (1970) would
surely disagree. However, the evidence above suggests that poverty is a difficult
realism that governments as well as corporate leaders around the world have become
accustomed to and Leisinger (2007) suggests that the corporation is the key. Is the
solution to poverty the corporation? It can be postulated that it is because successful
corporate operations lead to economic growth, which increases choice, provides more
opportunities, and renders development efforts easier for developing countries
(Leisinger, 2007, p. 114). This study seeks to find the answer.
The Business Stance
As with any theory, ethical or otherwise, there are always those that take a
particular position to certain theoretical perspectives; this study reveals nothing
different. For instance, there are three ways business leaders look at social their
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
5/28
The Corporation 5
responsibilities and their contributions to it such as neo-liberal, stakeholder, and a
broader goals perspective (Weyzig, 2009, p.418).
Neo-Liberal Perspective
As implied earlier, this perspective aligns with Friedmans (1970) view that
business is not in the business of supporting or contributing to social welfare programs
such as the reduction of poverty, for example. Sure, business should abide by
applicable laws and ethical norms of conducting business, such as those related to safe
working conditions for employees, employees rights, and the prevention of sexual
harassment, and the like, while focusing on the maximization of profits (Friedman).
For example, Weyzig (2009) suggests that when left alone, corporations can
create greater wealth for society by pursuing the path for profit maximization versus
assuming other non-profit related activities such as social welfare programs. The only
moral duty a corporation has is to refrain from unfair completion and exercising market
power (p. 420), among others. Greenwood (2002) suggest that once affirmative social
obligations to society are assigned to corporate entities, the environment can demand
more than the firm is capable of providing, can impact the firms profits, and ultimately
its survival.
Furthermore, Buchholz (1991) agrees with Friedman (1970) in that the sole
purpose of a business is to provide goods and services to consumers. Further, firm
should maximize the effective and efficient uses of resources in such a way as to offer
their products at the lowest possible price, which contributes to the firms profits. In
doing so, the firm contributes to and increases the wealth of society (Buchholz, p. 19).
Finally, under this perspective, it can be generally accepted that the benefits of the
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
6/28
The Corporation 6
corporate entity and the markets they participate in will be trickled down (Wettstein,
2008, p. 252) to the poorest members of society, effectively relieving corporations from
any responsibility (p. 252).
Stakeholder Perspective
The stakeholder perspective is much different that the neo-liberal view; its focus
is on the maximization of profits with the added feature of considering the firms
stakeholders in its planning activities, and is often voluntary (Weyzig, 2009, p. 419).
Further, Pirsch, Gupta, and Grau (2007) suggests that this theory takes both economic
and non-economic (p. 127) into consideration with regard to its survival and success;
this is by far much different that the neo-liberal view as described above. For instance,
Husted and Allen (2000) suggest that during planning activities, managers must
consider the effects of business operations of the firms stakeholders such as
customer, consumers, vendors, supply chain, and the community at large (p. 24).
Further, it could be speculated that during planning activities, firms adapt to
stakeholder concerns by including this group into the planning activities (Shepard, Bets,
and OConnell, 1997, p. 1007). Moreover, more companies are engaging dialog in this
format to seek and develop responses to the social demands of various stakeholders,
which provide unclear signals (Garriga and Mele, 2004, p. 59).
Also, Amba-Rao (1993) suggests that this is an accommodative and reactive
(p. 554) approach and typically focuses on what the firm should not do and is often
negative (p. 418). This format of correspondence with the environment seeks to
sensitize and understand the dilemmas the firm faces with regard to stakeholders. The
motivation for the stakeholder view goes further than just being accommodative and
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
7/28
The Corporation 7
reactive, however. For example, Pirsch, et al. (2007) suggests that a competitive
advantage is obtained by developing a level of trust and loyalty of customers in the
firms targeted market, which can, and often does, increase profits.
Finally, in order for stakeholders interests to be included in the planning process,
they must actively participate in the process; the concern however, is that in third-world
countries participation of stakeholders is often thwarted by the lack of education (Amba-
Rao).
Broader Goals Perspective
Here is where things get interesting. This perspective takes a firms participation
in societal activities well beyond their net present value (Weyzig, 2009, p. 419). This
perspective takes the firm from a reactive stance as in the two previous perspectives to
an active or proactive stance (p. 419). For instance, firms taking a broader goals
perspective actively engage its environment contributing significant resources to
sustainable development and poverty reduction (p. 419) activities in the community
that the firm resides in.
Further this perspective goes beyond behavioral norms and focuses on actions
that go beyond the firms legal obligations (Weyzig, 2009, p. 420). For example, Shaw
and Barry (2007), suggest that corporate entities have social responsibilities because of
their great social and economic power (p. 215) and with that power comes social
responsibility (p. 215)
Examples of some of the activities that the firm undertakes here are cause-
related marketing, community investments (such as constructing or investing is schools,
medical activities, and food subsidies for workers, etc.), and partnerships with
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
8/28
The Corporation 8
governments or non-governmental organizations (NGOs) (p. 420). Finally, the net
effect of following this perspective is the improvement and harmonization of business
actions with society and the improvement of societys quality of life in the broadest
possible ways (Shaw and Barry, 2007, p. 215), creating a win-win situation (p. 420)
for most firms.
The Business Related Ethical Issues of Poverty
Firms that globalize, that is, move into developing countries, tend to stimulate the
host areas where they operate, whether moving and establishing a presence there or
through foreign direct investment (FDI). Globalization, therefore, causes responsibility
issues in the relationship between the host country and their citizens (Amba-Rao, 1993),
especially in the moral sense.
For instance, it is suggested that this relationship can have a significant effect on
the standard of living (Amba-Rao, 1993, p. 553) of citizens in the host nation that the
firm operates in. This relationship can be beneficial, as in the case where business
operations help to raise the standard of living or harmful when a business implements
harmful marketing schemes and unethical employment practices (p. 553), for example.
Therefore, before entering into a discussion on how or if a corporate entity can
be beneficial to the reduction of global poverty, it is necessary to examine the ethical
underpinnings of poverty. As suggested earlier, there are three possible ethical theories
that form the foundation of such a strategy, which are the utilitarian theory, the theory of
justice, and the rights principle (Amba-Rao, 1993).
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
9/28
The Corporation 9
Utilitarian Theory
With regard to most activities, and especially corporate activities, this theory is
most concerned with the consequences of corporate decisions on society. Velasquez
(2006) suggests that when management chooses a course of action to pursue in a
business decision, to be ethical, the action should produce the greatest amount of
utility (p. 62). This theory of the greatest good, or what Mill (as cited in Sher, 2001)
describes as the greatest happiness principle (p. 3) is possibly the strongest argument
for corporate involvement.
Mill (as cited in Sher, 2001) suggests that the moral foundation for all actions is
utility (p. 7). Further, this foundation holds that the consequence of actions are
considered to the right as long as the action promotes happiness (p. 7) and where
actions detract from happiness, these actions will be wrong (p. 7). Conducting
operations that place women and children at risk would not be conducive to Mills
utilitarian theory. Mill further suggests that pleasure and the freedom from pain are the
only desirable ends (Sher). The only action deemed moral or right, would be the actions
taken by the firm to reduce the level of poverty in their area of operations.
However, whats missing above is the quality and quantity of the action. Mill (as
cited in Sher, 2001) suggests in his utilitarian theory that all human suffering can be
conquered by human care and effort (p. 15) through some sacrifice of their own
greatest good for the good of others (p. 17), anything else would be a waste of
resources. Therefore, one could postulate that by paying decent wages and conducting
safe operations, a corporation would be sacrificing profit for employee safety and
increase employee livelihood. Finally, Mill suggests that any action that one does for the
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
10/28
The Corporation 10
good or one that creates the greatest happiness must have the interest of the whole at
stake (Sher).
Justice
It could be suggested that globalization of markets has created more unjust in the
world than many earlier economic changes of the past (Wettstien, 2008). That being
said, justice is the foundation of modern civilized societies (Mofid, 2003, p. 24);
however, there are many instances of injustice around the globe in the form of poverty.
Further, Hume (2006) agrees and suggests that justice creates utility and supports a
civil society (para. 152) and he goes further to suggest that society could not exist
without justice.
For instance, without justice Hume (2006) suggests that there will be nothing but
utter chaos and confusion; what would be the justice of a broken promise or the
invasion of the properties of others (para. 153). One could postulate that no justice can
be achieved in either activity. Insofar as we enjoy our happiness and welfare (para.
193), Hume suggests that all mankind reaps the benefits of justice because it can lead
to the equality.
For instance, Hartman (2005) would agree because justice towards mankind can
lead to equitable distribution of goods and services (p. 7) as well as wealth. Also, as
suggested earlier, protecting property rights and the security of contracts, strong
governments would impose more justice in management of day-to-day operations,
which will benefit society.
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
11/28
The Corporation 11
Mofid (2003) suggests that fairness and justice are not nice-to-have (p. 28)
components of the corporate-society relationships, they are fundamental (p. 28)
components that support a sustainable and durable social order (p. 28). However,
Velasquez (2006) suggests that this theory is a purely formal perspective based on a
logical idea that the distribution of some commodity must be consistent in the way we
treat similar situations (p. 89).
Rights
Rights are based on freedom, justice, and peace (Harman, Shaw, and
Stevenson, 2003, p. 199) and are tightly connected to duties (Velasquez, 2006).
Rousseau (2005) and Hegel (as cited in Cutris, 2008) would agree. These rights include
liberty, security of person, and humane treatment (Harman, et al., 2003, p. 200). Each
of these rights implies a duty. Hegel suggests that if one has a right to liberty, others
have a duty not to interfere with that right (Curtis, p. 95). In fact, Rousseau suggests
that all should be treated equal; that they should enjoy the same rights (para. 90), for
example.
Further, Rousseau (2005) suggests that no person or state (corporation in this
case) should draw (para. 90) any distinction between those who make up the state or
community. This suggests that everyone has a right to be treated equal regardless of
their status and by failing to treat all equally, the entity would not be supporting the utility
of happiness, or as Rousseau suggests, such actions taken by an entity can have no
other object than the general good (para. 90).
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
12/28
The Corporation 12
Discussion
The evidence above suggests that there are many ethical problems that can be
associated with global poverty such as the restriction of rights, inequality in the
distributions of a nations wealth or the riches of the affluent as well as the consequence
of a firms decisions on a local communitys environment and people. Further, some
(Garten, 2002) suggest that the best way to rid the world of poverty, there must be a
coalition against poverty, much like one built in the Global War of Terrorism, which is
made of a large number of countries that suggest Terrorism will be the downfall of the
modern world.
Furthermore, Garvey and Newell (2005) suggests that this coordinated effort
among business, government, and civil society is the key to achieving lasting human
development and to make globalization improve the lifestyles of people. This is clear
since the estimated annual cost to significantly reduce global poverty will be $50 billion
(Garten, 2002, para. 11) in aid. However, Garten suggests that a tougher stance needs
to be taken such as with debt reductions (para. 12) for the poorest nations as an
example.
Additionally, this coalition should not be made up of governmental bodies alone;
in addition to these institutions, this coalition should be made up of a mixture of
multinational corporations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs) as well as other
non-government related institutions (Garten, 2002). A coalition made of many
organizations such as those recommended here, will send a powerful signal that
poverty is a menace to the world. Some of the actions that could be taken by this
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
13/28
The Corporation 13
coalition could revolve around trade issues, prevention of disease, and development
activities.
Trade Restrictions
First, trade restrictions can be lifted for the impoverished countries so that they
can gain access to more markets. For instance, the World Bank (as cited in Garten,
2002) suggests that tariffs and subsidies that are charged by the richer industrialized
nations prevent poorer countries from obtaining access to markets. As a result,
corporations are reluctant to invest in these nations as products imported into other
nations have a higher cost, which defeat the purpose of investing in an area where labor
is cheaper.
Further, allowing access to more markets allows the countrys growth to increase
in multiple ways. For instance, Moyo and Ferguson (2009) suggest that economic
growth as a result of trade occurs in two ways. First, by increasing trade, a firm
increases the amounts of good traded in the market and second, by driving up the
productivity of the workforce (p. 114). Also, it can be suggested that a country can lose
a great deal of revenue because of subsidies, in upwards of $500 billion (p. 115), in
the case of Africa (p. 115), for example.
Disease Prevention
Wettstein (2008) suggests that there are millions are still dying (p. 248)
because of poverty related starvation and diseases. Corporate executives can pursue
avenues to either reduce the level of poverty related deaths and diseases as well as
contributing to the prevention of future outbreaks in countries around the world. Garten
(2002) suggests that this is a worthy act in itself (para. 14).
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
14/28
The Corporation 14
Also, Garten suggests that this can be a key (para. 14) activity for the reduction
of poverty. For instance, a healthy population can contribute to their own development,
inciting a level of success and self-worth. Companies do not have to take this problem
on their own, the coalition provides the benefit of being able to have a pool of
contributors where a fund is built and maintained to where disease prevention activities
can be pulled from.
Local Development
Development tends to spur growth. However, as mentioned elsewhere in this
study, implementing such activity will be difficult. For instance, how is a corporate
executive to decide where, when, and what development should take place? Garten
(2002) suggests this is as simple as entering into a joint venture with a government
entity and conducting research and development activities to determine what
development will can benefit the utility of the country and its people, as well as
contribute to the profits of the firm.
Corporate Social Responsibility
Many of the actions suggested above are conducive with what is called corporate
social responsibility (CSR). Further, CSR is to business as the generally accepted
accounting practices is to accounting. It establishes general accepted relationship,
obligations, and duties that relate to the corporate impact on the welfare of society
(Robin and Reidenback, 1987, p. 45). Further, CSR is not new; it has been around
since 1953 (Garriga and Mele, 2004, p. 51). Since that time, others have pursued this
area of research (Pirsch, Gupta, and Grau, 2007; Robins, 2008; Ketola, 2007; among
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
15/28
The Corporation 15
others). Moreover, Robins (2008) suggests that CSR is a concept that generalizes the
behavior of a company as being good or bad.
However, Jonker and Marberg (2007) suggest that there is more to CSR than
just the behavior of the firm. In addition to conduct or actions as suggest by Robins, it is
also about the policies that a firm implements with regard to the firms society-related
issues (Jonker and Marberg, p. 109). For example, Carroll (as cited in Pirsch, et al.
2007) defines CSR as a construct that encompasses the economic, legal, and
discretional expectations that society has of organizations at a given point and time (p.
126).
For example, Nelson, Ishikawa, and Geaneotes (2009) suggest that the
corporate entity can contribute to the elimination of poverty through creating jobs,
improving the livelihoods, and enhancing economic options (p. 7) for those in poverty
situations. Further, Nelson, et al. (2009) suggests that in addition to the above
contributions, the corporate entity also helps in transferring skills, technologies and
quality management and business standards (p. 7). Many of these activities fall in to
several components of what CSR can offer. For instance, Table 1 describes some of
the high-level components of CSR.
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
16/28
The Corporation 16
Table 1.
Components of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
Area of ConcernEmployee Rights
Product SafetyEcological ConcernsPovertySocial Integration and EthicsEconomic GrowthNote. Data in rows 2-5 are from Corporate social responsibility quo vadis? A critical inquiry into a discursive struggle. Journal of
Corporate Citizenship, (2007) by J. Jonker and A. Marburg, (p. 109). Data in 6-7 are from Corporate social responsibility theories:
Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, (2004), by E. Garriga and D. Mele, (p.52). Data in row 8 are from Reasons to be
cheerful? What we know about CSRs Impact. Third World Quarterly, (2007), by M. Blowfield, (p. 689)
Shepard, Betz, and OConnell (1997) suggest that since companies are part of
society, or specifically, they are a social institution embedded in communities and the
larger society (p. 1004) they may have a significant part in societys survival. For
instance, Leisinger (2005) suggests that because corporations are part of society, there
are certain actions (see Table 2) that a company should consider when engaging in
CSR activities.
Enlightened Corporate Social Responsibility
Leisinger (2005) suggest that these actions are considered this to be the
enlightened definition of CSR (p. 583). Further, this enlightened definition, as it is
called, is broken down into three areas of actions or compliance, must do, ought to do,
and can do (p. 583). Shepard, et al. (1997) agrees and adds that this is a form of
communitarianism (p. 1004), which can be considered important for prosperity in
todays fiercely competitive global environment (p. 1004).
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
17/28
The Corporation 17
Table 2
The activities of CSR.
Must Do(Minimum Standards)
Ought to Do(Good Corporate Citizen)
Can Do(Deserving of Public Praise)
Produce quality
products/services
Avoid questionable practices Corporate philanthropy
Comply with applicable laws and
regulations
Being fair and responsible to
legitimate concerns of
stakeholders
Contribute to community and
neighborhood programs
Promote equal and fair wages Working legitimately beyond
legal requirements
Volunteerism
Provide safe working conditions Good social and environmental
conduct
Donations
Engage in profit makingMake wise strategic decisionsNote: Data in table is from The corporate social responsibility of the pharmaceutical industry: Idealism without illusion and realism
without resignation, (2005), by K. Leisinger, (p. 583).
Further, this compliance ranges from minimal compliance, the must do
(Leisinger, 2005, p. 583), to actions that exceed the firms legal and moral obligations,
the can do (p. 583). As an example, just complying with ethical norms and abiding by
the rules of the game would be an example of must do actions. To take the minimalist
perspective on step further, following the guidelines of the Occupational Safety & Health
Administration (OSHA) by installing shield guards in a manufacturing plant, for example,
would be a must do activity.
Business Contribution to Society
Also, firms that employ CSR as a strategy can make contributions to society in
many ways. For instance, employing this strategy, firms contribute to the environment
by creating jobs and providing training opportunities for the less fortunate (Boyle and
Boguslaw, 2007, p. 106). Also, by establishing a partnership with other firms such as
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
18/28
The Corporation 18
those in the firms supply chain for example, the firm can provide expertise and
resources (p. 106) to these firms expanding their social agenda to other localities.
Furthermore, firms can further their social agenda as well as benefit their
resources by improving the education level of the community by offering scholarship
aid and financial support (Boyle and Boguslaw, 2007p. 106) to the youth that are
financially stricken in the community that the firm operates in. Additionally, these
activities are considered to be directly influencing the firms environment, however,
Boyle and Boguslaw suggest that a firm can, and often does, indirectly help in social
welfare activities indirectly, by providing FDI into local firms, which often generates
economic growth (Frynas, 2008, p. 275).
Also, CSR facilitates the protection of the public welfare and private interests in
many ways. First, by pursuing legal and ethical means of operating, the firm prohibits
the exploitations of workers and society (Cava and Mayer, 2007). Further, by strategic
philanthropy, and compliance (Nelson, Ishikawa, and Geaneotes, 2009, p. 6) with local
laws and codes, the benefit their reputation and add to the contributions of local
development, which creates more markets for the firms products, which increase
profits. Therefore there are good reasons to see that CSR is good for both business and
society.
Furthermore, the evidence suggested above indicates that CSR is an appealing
way to help with social welfare issues, however, Buchholz (1991) suggests that this
strategy is often hard to implement because there is no real proof (p. 22) that such a
program can actually work. For example, Frynas (2008) suggests that there is a lack of
empirical evidence and a supporting business case (p. 274) that this strategy is useful
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
19/28
The Corporation 19
to any firms. Although Frynas acknowledges that programs of this type exist, there is
just not enough evidence to support such a strategy.
Cost and Benefits of Corporate Social Responsibility
In addition, this type of program is expensive and often cuts into a firms bottom
line, detracting from the earnings of stockholders. Further, the economic performance of
the firm has priority over all other social activities, and the reservation of funds for the
pursuit of such activities would affect the long-term survival of the firm, which is often
measured by the firms level of profit and growth (Buchholz, 1991, p. 22).
Even with the difficulties suggested above, Pirsch, et al. (2007) suggest that
there is a strong argument for this type of strategy. For instance, Pirsch, et al. suggests
that the benefits of such a strategy often outweigh the costs and can be measured in
the firms performance. Further, Pirsch et al. suggests that customers tend to display a
willingness to purchase products from companies that engage in these activities.
Further, engaging in CSR activities can improve the firms image (Pirsch et al.,
2007, P. 125), creating a loyal customer following. Loyalty can be translated into higher
sales, and higher profits. Further, in areas where the firm operates, this strategy can be
translated into higher community support (p. 125) for the company, making tactical
operating decisions in that region easier to manage.
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
20/28
The Corporation 20
Acceptance of Corporate Social Responsibility
With that said, businesses need to be prepared to accept that they must play
more than an economic role in society. As Robins (2007) puts it; businesses should
accept a direct responsibility for making the world a better place (p. 330). This suggests
that by ignoring CSR a company could be committing suicide (Ketola, 2007).
For instance, CSR represents a set of principles by which a company can all but
guarantee its survival as well as providing for the protection of the public welfare and
private interests, while maintaining its profitability (Logsdon and Wood, 2002). For
instance, by incorporating CSR activities into decision-making activities the firm could
benefit through an enhanced labor market as well as local markets to purchase raw
materials. This translates into higher profits because the local area provides consumers
for its goods and services (Mofid, 2003; Cava and Mayer, 2007).
Also, the language of economics lacks the moral language necessary to address
poverty (Wettstein, 2008). With respect to the developed world, their core values over
the years have changed when it comes to discriminatory work practices, human rights,
and environmental degradation, among others (Fuentes-Garcia, Nunez-Tabales, and
Veroz-Herradon, 2007, p.27). CSR can also be linked to three other factors. First, there
had been an increase in regulation by intuitive institutions such as the United Nations,
European Union, among others, that requires corporations to work within guidelines that
work for the good of society (Fuentes-Garcia, et al., 2007, p. 27).
Second, consumers are placing increased pressures of firms to produce green
products and to find alternative uses for non-renewable resources (Fuentes-Garcia, et
al., 2007, p. 27). Thirdly, Wall Street investors are choosing companies that develop
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
21/28
The Corporation 21
good CSR programs (p. 27) to invest in; this can be typically done through investment
tools such as mutual funds and the bonds market. Finally, with the multitude of real life
reasons for institutionalizing CSR programs, there are a multitude of ethical reasons
behind the CSR programs.
Conclusions and Future Research
This study looked at poverty, its ethical implications, as well as a possible
business solution to poverty. Early in this study it was hypothesized that the solution to
poverty is the corporation. This study looked at the business stance, which reflected the
three different views of businesss stance to social welfare activities.
Of the three views, the broader goals perspective looked most appealing
because this perspective includes social issues in business planning, which allows for
companies to pursue profit maximization as well as social activities. Further, proven or
not, these activities can add to the good of society while preserving, and possibly
increasing the firms bottom line.
The moral implication of poverty affects society in many different ways. This
study hit on the three main topics such as rights, justice, and utilitarianism; there could
be more ethical implications such as the ethic of caring, for example. However, these
theories seem to work best when looking at the consequence of business planning and
operations. Further, when looking to businesss contributions to social welfare, a
business can affect more good on justice by creating jobs, thereby, increasing the
equality with respect to better income, increased quality of life, and access to better
health.
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
22/28
The Corporation 22
Moreover, increased quality of life offers the impoverished populations the
opportunity gain their personal liberty, access to property, and increase their personal
security levels. Also, as a byproduct of the citizens increased income and welfare,
government revenues will increase and will be more able to protect these rights. This
suggests that there are significant political implication ties to any solution to poverty and
the corporations involvement (Robins, 2008).
Once the government is better able to govern, then more companies begin to
invest in there areas by either establishing operations in the region, or through FDI. As a
company grows, the government works to expand its trading partners, thereby creating
more demand for its products, which will increase the nations productivity (Moyo and
Ferguson, 2009). This cycle continues creating further economic growth.
These coordinated government and corporate activities can be the key to long
term economic growth and stability. Therefore, the answer the question posed earlier is
that the corporation can be part of the solution to poverty, which supports Garvey and
Newells (2005) and Leisingers (2007) suggestions that the solution to poverty is a
coordinated effort among business, government, and civil society.
Through the actions of these entities, individual rights will be protected, justice
will be served through the equal distribution of societys benefits and burdens, and
society as a whole will be benefit from the good that is produced as a result of their
coordinated effort. Finally, Robins (2008) suggests that future research could be
benefited by investigating the possible correlation between CSR expenditures and
some financial measure of business success (p. 334). This research could help to
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
23/28
The Corporation 23
prove the link, if any, between CSR activities and the increased social benefit that is
realized by the firms environment.
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
24/28
The Corporation 24
References
Amba-Rao, S. C. (1993). Multinational corporate social responsibility, ethics,
internationals and third world governments: An agenda of for the 1990s. Journal
of Business Ethics, 12(7), 553-572.
Blowfield, M. (2007). Reasons to be cheerful? What we know about CSRs Impact.
Third World Quarterly, 28(4), 683-695.
Boyle, M.-E., & Boguslaw, J. (2007). Business, poverty and corporate citizenship. The
Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 26, 101-120.
Buchholz, R. A. (1991). Corporate social responsibility and the good society: From
economics to ecology. Business Horizons, 34(3), 19-31.
Cava, A., & Mayer, D. (2007). Integrative Social Contract Theory and Urban Prosperity
Initiatives. Journal of Business Ethics, 72(3), 263-278.
Curtis, M. (2008). The great political theories: A comprehensive selection of the crucial
ideas in political philosophy from the French Revolution to modern times. (Vol. 2).
New York: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.
Friedman, M. (Sept. 1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.
The New York Times Magazine, 32-33, 122, 124, 126.
Frynas, G. J. (2008). Corporate social responsibility and international development:
Critical assessment. Corporate Governance, 16(4), 274-281
Fuentes-Garcia, F. J., Nunez-Tabales, J. M., & Veroz-Herradon, R. (2008). Applicability
of corporate social responsibility to human resources management: Perspective
from Spain. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 27-44.
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
25/28
The Corporation 25
Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the
territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51-74.
Garten, J. E. (2002). Reducing global poverty. The Politics of fortune: A new agenda for
business leaders. United States: Harvard Business Press.
Garvey, N., & Newell, P. (2005). Corporate accountability to the poor? Assessing the
effectiveness of community-based strategies. Development in Practice, 15(3&4),
389-404.
Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal
of Business Ethics, 36(3), 261-278.
Hartman, L. P. (2005). Perspectives in Business Ethics.(3rd ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill
Irwin.
Hartman, L. P., Shaw, B., & Stevenson, R. (2003). Exploring the ethics and economics
of global labor standards: A challenge to integrated social contract theory.
Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(2), 193-220.
Hume, D. (2006).An enquiry into the principle of moral. Retrieved September 6, 2009
from http://etext.library.adelaide.edu.au/h/hume/david/h92pm/complete.html
Husted, B. W., & Allen, D. B. (2000). Is it ethical to use ethics as a strategy? Journal of
Business Ethics, 27(1/2), 21-31.
Jonker, J. & Marberg, A. Corporate social responsibility quo vadis? A critical inquiry into
a discursive struggle. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 27, 107-118.
Ketola, T. (2008). A holistic corporate responsibility model: Integrating values,
discourses, and actions. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 419-435.
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
26/28
The Corporation 26
Leisinger, K. M. (2005). CSR and the pharmaceutical industry: Idealism without illusion
and realism without resignation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(4), 577-594.
Leisinger, K. M. (2007). Capitalism with a human face: The UN global compact. The
Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 28, 113-132.
Logsdon, J. M., & Wood, D. J. (2002). Business citizenship: From domestic to global
level of access. Business Ethics Quarterly, 12(2), 155-187.
Nelson, J., Ishikawa, E., & Geaneotes, A. (2003). Developing inclusive business
models: A review f Coca-Colas manual distribution centers in Ethiopia and
Tanzanai. International Finance Corporation, World Bank Group. 1-26.
Mofid, K. (2003). Business Ethics, corporate social lresponsibilty and globalization for
the common good. London: Shepheard-Walwyn, Ltd.
Moyo, D., & Ferguson, N. (2009). Dead aid: Why aid is not working and how there is a
better way for Africa. New York: Farrar, Straus, and Giroux.
Paine, T. (2003). Common sense, rights of man, and other essential writings of Thomas
Paine. (200th Anniversary ed.). United States: Signet Classics.
Pirsch, J., Gupta, S., & Grau, S. L. (2007). A framework for understanding corporate
social responsibility program as a continuum: An exploratory study. Journal of
Business Ethics, 70, 125-140.
Pogge, T. (2003). World poverty and human rights. Ethics & International Affairs, 19(1),
1-7.
Robin, D. P., & Reidenbach, R. E. (1987). Social responsibility, ethics, and marketing
strategy: Closing the gap between concept and application. Journal of Marketing,
51(1), 44-58.
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
27/28
The Corporation 27
Robins, F. (2008). Why corporate social responsibility should be popularized but not
imposed. Corporate Governance, 8(3), 330-341.
Rousseau, J. J. (2005). The social contract, or principles of political right (du contract
social) Retrieved September 4, 2009 from University of Adelaide,
http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/r/rousseau/jean_jacques/r864s/complete.html
Shau, A. (2009). Poverty Facts and Stats. Retrieved September, 10, 2009, from
http://www.globalissues.org/article/26/poverty-facts-and-stats
Shaw, W. H., & Barry, V. (2007). Corporations. Moral Issues in Business. (10th ed.).
Belmont, CA: Thompson Higher Education.
Shepard, J. M., Betz, M., & OConnell, L. (1997). The proactive company: Its nature and
causes. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(10), 1001-1010.
Sher, G. (Ed.). (2001). John Stuart Mill: Utilitarianism and the 1868 speech on capital
punishment. (2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc.
Velasquez, M. G. (2006). Business ethics: Concepts and cases. (6th ed.). New Jersey:
Pearson.
Wettstein, F. (2008). Let's talk rights: Message for the just corporation-Transforming the
economy through the language of rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 247-
263.
Weyzig, F. (2009). Political and economic arguments for corporate social responsibility:
Analysis and a proposition regarding the CSR agenda. Journal of Business
ethics, 86, 417-428.
7/27/2019 The Corporation, is it a Key to Poverty?
28/28
The Corporation 28