McGeorge Law Review

Volume 26 | Issue 2 Article 4

1-1-1995

The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood: ASelected Interdisciplinary BibliographyEvelyn PosamentierUniversity of the Pacific; McGeorge School of Law

Sue WelshUniversity of the Pacific; McGeorge School of Law

Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/mlr

Part of the Law Commons

This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals and Law Reviews at Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion inMcGeorge Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact mgibney@pacific.edu.

Recommended CitationEvelyn Posamentier & Sue Welsh, The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood: A Selected Interdisciplinary Bibliography, 26 Pac. L. J. 147(1995).Available at: https://scholarlycommons.pacific.edu/mlr/vol26/iss2/4

Bibliography

The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood:A Selected Interdisciplinary Bibliography

Evelyn Posamentier and Sue Welsh*"

Books and Monographs

Alpem, Kenneth D., ed., THE ETHICS OF REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGY (NewYork, NY: Oxford University Press, 1992)

Anderson, Elizabeth, VALUE IN ETHICS AND ECONOMICS (Cambridge, MA:Harvard University Press, 1993)

Andrews, Kenneth R. and Donald K. David, eds., ETHICS IN PRACTICE:MANAGING THE MORAL CORPORATION (Boston, MA: Harvard Bus. School Press,1989)

Andrews, Lori, BETWEEN STRANGERS: SURROGATE MOTHERS, EXPECTANTFATHERS, AND BRAVE NEW BABIES (New York, NY: Harper & Row, 1989)

Bartels, Dianne M., ed., BEYOND BABY M: ETHICAL ISSUES IN NEW REPRO-DUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES (Clifton, NJ: Humana Press, 1990)

Bartlett, Katharine T., GENDER AND LAW: THEORY, DOCTRINE, COMMENTARY(Boston, MA: Little, Brown, 1993)

Beauchamp, Tom L. and LeRoy Walters, eds., CONTEMPORARY ISSUES INBIOETHICS, 4th ed., (Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1994)

California Legislature, Joint Committee on Surrogate Parenting, COMMERCIALAND NONCOMMERCIAL SURROGATE PARENTING: A REPORT TO THE CALIFORNIALEGISLATURE FROM THE JOINT COMMITTEE ON SURROGATE PARENTING

(Sacramento, CA: Joint Publications, 1990)

M.A., M.L.S, Reference Librarian at University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law.B.A., M.S.L.S., Reader Services Librarian at University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law.

1995/The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood

Chapman, John N. and J. Roland Pennock, eds., MARKETS AND JUSTICE (NewYork, NY: New York University Press, 1989)

Chesler, Phyllis, SACRED BOND: THE LEGACY OF BABY M. (New York, NY:Random House, 1988)

Cohen, Sherrill and Nadine Taub eds., A LAWMAKER'S GUIDETO REPRODUCTIVEFREEDOMS-A REVIEW OF REPRODUCTIVE LAWS FOR THE 1990S (Clifton, NJ:Humana Press, 1989)

Congress of the U.S., Office of Technology Assessment, INFERTILITY, MEDICALAND SOCIAL CHANGES (Washington, DC: Government Printing Office, 1988)

Corea, Genovetta, THE MOTHER MACHINE: REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES FROM

ARTIFICIAL INSEMINATION TO ARTIFICIAL WOMBS (New York, NY: Harper &

Row, 1985)

Feinman, Clarice, ed., THE CRIMINALIZATION OF A WOMAN'S BODY (New York,NY: Haworth Press, 1992)

Field, Martha A., SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD (Cambridge, MA: HarvardUniversity Press, 1988)

Fox, Robin, REPRODUCTION AND SUCCESSION: STUDIES IN ANTROPOLOGY, LAW

AND SOCIETY (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publications, 1992)

Gostin, Larry, ed., SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD: POLITICS & PRIVACY(Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1990)

Keane, Noel P. with Dennis L. Breo, THE SURROGATE MOTHER (New York, NY:Everest House, 1981)

Kimbrell, Andrew, THE HUMAN BODY SHOP: THE ENGINEERING AND MARKETINGOF LIFE (San Francisco, CA: HarperCollins, 1993)

Landau, Elaine, BLACK MARKET ADOPTION AND THE SALE OF CHILDREN (New

York, NY: F. Watts, 1990)

Lauritzen, Paul, PURSUING PARENTHOOD: ETHICAL ISSUES IN ASSISTED RE-PRODUCTION (Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, 1993)

Macklin, Ruth, SURROGATES AND OTHER MOTHERS: THE DEBATES OVERASSISTED REPRODUCTION (Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press, 1994)

Vol. 26/Pacific Law Journal

Morgan, Derek, SURROGACY AND THE MORAL ECONOMY (Brookfield, VT:Ashgate Publishing Co., 1994)

New Jersey Task Force on New Reproductive Practices, POLICY RECOM-MENDATIONS ON SURROGACY, APPROVED IN PRINCIPLE BY THE NEW JERSEY

BIOETHICS COMMISSION (1989)

Overall, Christine, HUMAN REPRODUCTION: PRINCIPLES, PRACTICES, POLICIES(Toronto, CAN: Oxford University Press, 1993)

ETHICS AND HUMAN REPRODUCTION: A FEMINIST ANALYSIS (New York,NY: Routledge, 1987)

Pateman, Carole, THE SEXUAL CONTRACT (Stanford, CA: Stanford UniversityPress, 1988)

Posner, Richard A., SEX AND REASON (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University

Press, 1992)

.___, ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF LAW, 3d ed. (Boston, MA: Little Brown, 1986)

Pretorius, Deiderika, SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD: A WORLDWIDE VIEW OF THEISSUES (Springfield, IL: CC Thomas, 1994)

Rae, Scott B., THE ETHICS OF COMMERICAL SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD: BRAVENEW FAMILIES? (Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing, 1993)

Ragone, Helena, SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD: CONCEPTION IN THE HEART(Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1994)

Raymond, Janice G., WOMEN AS WOMBS: REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES ANDTHE BATTLE OVER WOMEN'S FREEDOM (San Francisco, CA: HarperSanFrancisco, 1993)

Richardson, Herbert, ed., ON THE PROBLEM OF SURROGATE PARENTHOOD:ANALYZING THE BABY M CASE (Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, 1987)

Robertson, John A., CHILDREN OF CHOICE: FREEDOM AND THE NEWREPRODUCTIVETECHNOLOGIES (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994)

Rothman, Barbara Katz, RECREATING MOTHERHOOD: IDEOLOGY AND TECH-

NOLOGY IN A PATRIARCHAL SOCIETY (New York, NY: W.W. Norton, 1989)

1995 / The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood

Schwartz, Lita L., ALTERNATIVES TO INFERTILITY: IS SURROGACY THE ANSWER?(New. York, NY: Brunner-Mazel, 1991)

Shalev, Carmel, BIRTH POWER: THE CASE FOR SURROGACY (New Haven, CT:Yale University Press, 1989)

Shannon, Thomas A., SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD: THE ETHICS OF USING HUMAN

BEINGS (New York, NY: Crossroads, 1988)

Singer, Peter and Deane Wells, MAKING BABIES: THE NEW SCIENCE AND ETHICS

OF CONCEPTION (New York, NY: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1985)

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division, Family Part, Bergen County,BABY M CASE: THE COMPLETE TRIAL TRANSCRIPTS (DOCKET No. FM-25324-86E(217 N.J. SUPER. 313 (1987)) (Buffalo, NY: W.S. Hein, 1988)

Titmuss, Richard, THE GIFT RELATIONSHIP: FROM HUMAN BLOOD TO SOCIALPOLICY (New York, NY: Pantheon, 1963)

Warnock, Dame Mary, REPORT TO THE COMMITTEE OF INQUIRY INTO HUMAN

FERTILIZATION AND EMBRYOLOGY (London: United Kingdom Department ofHealth and Social Security, July 1984)

Whiteford, Linda M. and Marilyn L. Poland, eds., NEW APPROACHES TO HUMANREPRODUCTION: SOCIAL AND ETHICAL DIMENSIONS (Boulder, CO: Westview

Press, 1989)

Legal Literature

Allen, Anita L., Privacy, Surrogacy, and the Baby M Case (Colloquy: In re BabyM), 76 GEO. L.J. 1759 (1988)

Altman, Scott, (Com)modifying Experience (Symposium on Biomedical Tech-nology and Health Care: Social and Conceptual Transformations), 65 S. CAL. L.REV. 293 (1991)

Andrews, Lori B. and Lisa Douglass, Alternative Reproduction (Symposium onBiomedical Technology and Health Care: Social and Conceptual Transform-ations), 65 S. CAL. L. REv. 623 (1991)

Areen, Judith, Baby M Reconsidered (Colloquy: In re Baby M), 76 GEO. L.J.1741 (1988)

Vol. 26 /Pacific Law Journal

Baggish, Mindy Ann, Note, Surrogate Parenting: What We Can Learn from OurBritish Counterparts, 39 CASE W. REs. L. REV. 317 (1989)

Barrad, Catherine M. Valerio, Genetic Information and Property Theory, 87 Nw.

U. L. REV. 1037 (1992)

Bartlett, Katharine T., Re-Expressing Parenthood, 98 YALE L.J. 293 (1988)

Bezanson, Randall P., Sheldon F. Kurts, and Beverly Hovenkamp, Model Act:Model Human Reproductive Technologies and Surrogacy Act, 72 IowA L. REV.943 (1987)

Bray, Michelle Bourianoff, Note, Personalizing Personalty: Toward a PropertyRight in Human Bodies, 69 TEX. L. REV. 209 (1990)

Bussel, Karen A., Adventures in Babysitting-Gestational Surrogate MotherTort-Liability, 41 DUKE L.J. 661 (1991)

Capron, Alexander Morgan, Biomedical Technology and Health Care: Trans-forming Our World (Symposium on Biomedical Technology and Health Care:Social and Conceptual Transformations), 65 S. CAL. L. REV. 1 (1991)

____, and Margaret Jane Radin, Choosing Family Law Over Contract Law asa Paradigm for Surrogate Motherhood (Forum on Surrogate Motherhood:Politics and Privacy), 16 L. MED. & HEALTH CARE 34 (1988)

__, Alternative Birth Technologies: Legal Challenges, 20 U.C. DAVIS L. REV.679 (1987)

Cass, Ronald A., Coping With Life, Law, and Markets: A Comment on Posnerand the Law-and-Economics Debate (Forum: Adoption and Market Theory), 67B.U. L. REV. 73 (1987)

Cohen, Barbara, Surrogate Mothers-Whose Baby Is It?, 10 AM. J.L. & MED. 243(1984)

Cohen, Jane Maslow, Posnerism, Pluralism, Pessimism (Forum: Adoption andMarket Theory), 67 B.U. L. REV. 105 (1987)

Coleman, Michele N., Note, Embryo Transplant, Parental Conflict, and Repro-ductive Freedom: A Prospective Analysis of Issues and Arguments Created byForthcoming Technology, 15 HoFsTRA L. REV. 609 (1987)

1995 / The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood

Cunningham, Keith J., Comment, Surrogate Mother Contracts: Analysis of aRemedial Quagmire, 37 EMORY L.J. 721 (1988)

Dickson, Janet Hopkins, The Emerging Rights ofAdoptive Parents: Substance orSpecter?, 38 UCLA L. REv. 917 (1991)

Dolgin, Janet L., Just A Gene: Judicial Assumptions About Parenthood, 40UCLA L. REV. 637 (1993)

____, Status and Contract in Surrogate Motherhood-An Illumination of theSurrogacy Debate, 38 BUFF. L. REV. 515 (1990)

Eggen, Jean Macciaroli, The "Orwellian Nightmare" Reconsidered: A ProposedRegulatory Framework for the Advanced Reproductive Technologies, 25 GA. L.REv. 625 (1991)

Feinerman, James V., A Comparative Look at Surrogacy (Colloquy: In re BabyM), 76 GEO. L.J. 1837 (1988)

Flaherty, James T., Enforcement of Surrogate Mother Contracts: Case Law, theUniform Acts, and State and Federal Legislation, 36 CLEV. ST. L. REV. 223(1988)

Frankel, Tamar and Francis M. Miller, The Inapplicability of Market Theory toAdoptions (Forum: Adoption and Market Theory), 67 B.U. L. REV. 99 (1987)

Greco, Paul J., Parental Guidance Suggested-A Proposal for Regulating

Surrogate Parenthood, 22 COLUM. J.L. & Soc. PROBS. 115 (1989)

Hill, John Lawrence, What Does it Mean to Be a "Parent"? The Claims ofBiology as the Basis for Parental Rights, 66 N.Y.U. L. REV. 353 (1991)

Jackson, Vicki C., Baby M and the Question of Parenthood (Colloquy: In reBaby M), 76 GEo. L.J. 1811 (1988)

Katz, Avi, Surrogate Motherhood and the Baby Selling Laws, 20 COLUM. J.L. &SOC. PROBS. 1 (1986)

Krimmel, Herbert T., Can Surrogate Parenting Be Stopped? An Inspection of theConstitutional and Pragmatic Aspects ofAuthorizing Surrogate MotherArrange-ments, 27 VAL. U. L. REv. 1 (1992)

Vol. 26/Pacific Law Journal

Landes, Elizabeth M. and Richard A. Posner, The Economics of the BabyShortage, 7 J. LEGAL STUD. 323 (1978)

Levitt, Jamie, Biology, Technology and Genealogy: A Proposed Uniform

Surrogacy Legislation, 25 COLUM. J.L. & SOC. PROBs. 451 (1992)

Lieber, Katherine B., Note, Selling the Womb: Can the Feminist Critique ofSurrogacy Be Answered?, 68 IND. L.J. 205 (1992)

Mack, Eric, Dominoes and the Fear of Commodification, in MARKETS AND

JUSTICE, John N. Chapman and J. Roland Pennock, eds. (New York, NY: NewYork University Press, 1989)

Macklin, Ruth, Is There Anything Wrong with Surrogate Motherhood? An EthicalAnalysis (Forum on Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy), 16 L. MED. &HEALTH CARE 57 (1988)

Morgan, Derek, Making Motherhood Male-Surrogacy and the Morat)Economyof Women, 12 J.L. & Soc'Y 219 (1985)

Narveson, Jan, The Justice of the Market: Comments on Gray and Radin, inMARKETS AND JUSTICE, John N. Chapman and J. Roland Pennock, eds. (NewYork, NY: New York University Press, 1989)

National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws, Uniform Statusof Children of Assisted Conception Act, approved in 1988, in 9B UNIFORM LAWSANNOTATED, Cum. Ann. Pocket Part (1994)

Note, Rumpelstiltskin Revisited: The Inalienable Rights of Surrogate Mothers, 99HARV. L. REV. 1936 (1986)

O'Brien, Shari, Commercial Conceptions: A Breeding Ground for Surrogacy, 65N.C. L. REV. 127 (1986)

Parker, P.J., Surrogate Motherhood-The Interaction of Litigation, Legislationand Psychiatry, 5 INT'L J.L. & PSYCHIATRY 341 (1982)

Posner, Richard A., The Ethics and Economics of Enforcing Contracts ofSurrogate Motherhood, 5 J. CONTEMP. HEALTH L. & POL'Y 21 (1989)

__._, The Regulation ofthe Market in Adoptions (Forum: Adoption and MarketTheory), 67 B.U. L. REV. 59 (1987)

1995 / The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood

Prichard, J. Robert S., A Market for Babies? (Symposium: Economic Perspectiveson Issues in Family Law), 34U. TORONTO L.J. 341 (1984)

Radin, Margaret Jane, Lacking a Transformative Social Theory: A Response [toStephen J. SchnablyJ, 45 STAN. L. REV. 409 (1993)

Reflections on Objectification [response to Scott Altman] (Symposium onBiomedical Technology and Health Care: Social and Conceptual Trans-formations), 65 S. CAL. L. REv. 341 (1991)

_.___ The Pragmatist and the Feminist (Symposium on the Renaissance ofPragmatism in American Legal Thought), 63 S. CAL. L. REV. 1699 (1990)

__.___ Justice and the Market Domain, in MARKETS AND JUSTICE, John N.Chapman and J. Roland Pennock, eds. (New York, NY: New York UniversityPress, 1989)

Market-Inalienability, 100 HARV. L. REV. 1849 (1987)

Property and Personhood, 34 STAN. L. REV. 957 (1982)

Recht, Steven M., Note, "M" is Money: Baby M and the Surrogate MotherControversy, 37 AM. U. L. REv. 1013 (1988)

Roberts, Melinda A., Good Intentions and a Great Divide: Having Babies byIntending Them, 12L. & PHIL. 287 (1993)

Robertson, John A., In the Beginning: The Legal Status of Early Embryos, 76 VA.L. REV. 437 (1990)

. Embryos, Families, and Procreative Liberty: The Legal Structure of theNew Reproduction, 59 S. CAL. L. REV. 942 (1986)

Russell, Irma S., Within the Best Interests of the Child-The Factor of ParentalStatus in Custody Disputes Arising from Surrogacy Contracts, 27 J. FAM. L. 587

(1989)

Schnably, Stephen J., Property and Pragmatism: A Critique of Radin 's Theoryof Property and Personhood, 45 STAN. L. REV. 347 (1993)

Schneider, Carl E., Surrogate Motherhood from the Persepctive of Family Law,13 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 125 (1990)

Vol. 26/ Pacific Law Journal

Schuck, Peter H., Some Reflections on the Baby M Case (Colloquy: In re BabyM), 76 GEo. L.J. 1793 (1988)

Schwartz, Maria E., How Technology Has Affected the Legal System: GreatExpectations: The Surrogacy Debate Continues, 34 How. L.J. 169 (1991)

Serratelli, Arthur, Surrogate Motherhood Contracts: Should the British orCanadian Model Fill the U.S. Legislative Vacuum?, 26 GEO. WASH. J. INT'L L.& ECON. 633 (1993)

Shultz, Marjorie Maguire, Reproductive Technology and Intent-Based Parent-hood: An Opportunity for Gender Neutrality, 1990 Wis. L. REV. 297, (1990)

Smith, Brent P., Anna J. v. Mark C.-Proof of the Imminent Need for SurrogateMotherhood Regulation, 30 J. FAM. L. 493 (1992)

Spann, Girardeau A., Baby M and the Cassandra Problem (Colloquy: In re BabyM), 76 GEO. L.J. 1719 (1988)

Special Projects: Legal Rights and Issues Surrounding Conception, Pregnancy,and Birth (Special Projects Editors: Hutton Brown, Miram Dent, L. Mark Dyer,Cherie Fuzzell, Anita Gifford, Sam Griffin, A. G. Kasselberg, M.D., JayneWorkman, and Melanie L. Cooper) 39 VAND. L. REV. 497 (1986)

Strasser, Mark, Parental Rights Terminations: On Surrogate Reasons andSurrogacy Policies, 60 TENN. L. REV. 135 (1992)

Suh, Maurice M., Surrogate Motherhood-An Argument for Denial of Specific

Performance, 22 COLUM. J.L. & Soc. PROBS. 357 (1989)

Sunstein, Cass R., Neutrality in Constitutional Law, 92 COLUM. L. REV. 1 (1992)

, Disrupting Voluntary Transactions, in MARKETS AND JUSTICE, John N.Chapman and J. Roland Pennock, eds. (New York, NY: New York UniversityPress, 1989)

Tiller, Sharon L., Litigation, Legislation, and Limelight: Obstacles to Com-mercial Surrogate Mother Arrangements, 72 IowA L. REV. 415 (1987)

Wagner, William Joseph, The Contractual Reallocation of Procreative Resourcesand Parental Rights: The Natural Endowment Critique, 41 CASE W. RES. L. REV.1(1990)

1995 / The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood

Weber, Walter M., The Personhood of Unborn Children-A First Principle inSurrogate Motherhood Analysis, 13 HARV. J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 125 (1990)

West, Robin, A Rejoinder to Judge Posner (Colloquy: Submission, Choice, andEthics), 99 HARV. L. REV. 1449 (1986)

Wilker, Norma Juliet, Society's Response to the New Reproductive Technologies:The Feminist Perspectives, 59 S. CAL. L. REv. 1043 (1986)

Williams, Patricia J., On Being the Object of Property, in FEMINIST LEGAL

THEORY: READINGS IN LAW AND GENDER, Katharine T. Bartlett and RosanneKennedy, eds. (Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1991)

Non-Legal Literature

ACOG Committee Opinion, Committee on Ethics Number 88-November 1990,Ethical Issues in Surrogate Motherhood, 37 INT'L J. GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS

139 (1992)

Anderson, Elizabeth S., Is Women's Labor a Commodity?, 19 PHIL. PUB. AFP. 71(Winter 1990)

Andrews, Lori B., Control and Compensation: Laws Governing ExtracorporealGenerative Materials, 14 J. MED. PHIL. 541 (1989)

. Feminism Revisited: Fallacies and Policies in the Surrogacy Debate, 9Locos 81 (1988)

Andrews, Lori B., The Aftermath of Baby M: Proposed State Laws on SurrogateMotherhood, 17 HASTINGS CENTER REP. 31 (Oct. - Nov. 1987)

Anleu, Sharyn Roach, Surrogaipy: For Love but Not for Money?, 6 GENDER &SOc'y 30 (1992)

, Reinforcing Gender Norms: Commercial and Altruistic Surrogacy, 33ACTA SOCIOLOGIA 63 (1990)

Annas, George J., Death Without Dignity for Commercial Surrogacy: The Caseof Baby M, 18 HASTINGS CENTER REP. 21 (Apr. - May 1988)

, Baby M: Babies (and Justice) For Sale, 17 HASTINGS CENTER REP. 13(June 1987)

Vol. 26/Pacific Law Journal

Ardritti, Rita, The Surrogacy Business, 18 SOC. POL'Y 42 (1987)

Arneson, Richard J., Commodification and Commercial Surrogacy, 21 PHIL. PUB.AFF. 132 (Spring 1992)

Belliotti, Raymond A., Marxism, Feminism, and Surrogate Motherhood, 14 Soc.THEORY & PRAC. 389 (1988)

Bhimji, S., Womb for Rent-Ethical Aspects of Surrogate Motherhood, 137CANADIAN MED. ASSN. J. 1132 (1987)

Brahams, Diana, The Hasty British Ban on Commercial Surrogacy, 17 HASTINGSCENTER REP. 16 (Feb. 1987)

Brecher, Bob, Surrogacy and Its Consequences: Some Misgivings, 5 EXPLOR.KNOWvL. 17 (1988)

Callahan, Joan, Surrogate Motherhood: Politics and Privacy, 4 J. CLIN. ETHICS82 (Spring 1993)

Carbone, June, The Limits of Contract in Family Law: An Analysis of SurrogateMotherhood, 9 LOGOS 147 (1988)

Charo, R.A., Problems in Commercialized Surrogate Mothering, 13 WOMEN &HEALTH 195 (1987)

Chokr, N.N., Feminist Perspectives on Reproductive Technologies-The Politicsof Motherhood, 14 TECHNOLOGY IN SocIETY 317 (1992)

Cohen, B. and T.L. Friend, Legal and Ethical Implications of Surrogate MotherContracts, 14 CLINICS IN PERINATOLOGY 281 (1987)

Damico, Alfonso J., Surrogate Motherhood: Contract, Gender, and LiberalPolitics, in PUBLIC POLICY AND THE PUBLIC GOOD, Ethan Fishman, ed.(Westport, CN: Greenwood Press, 1991)

Davies, Iwan, Contracts to Bear Children, 11 J. MED. ETHICS 61 (June 1985)

Donovan, Patricia, New Reproductive Technologies: Some Legal Dilemmas, 18FAM. PLAN. PERSPECTIVES 57 (1986)

1995 / The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood

Ebrahim, Abul Fadl Mohsin, Islamic Teachings and Surrogate Motherhood, 3 J.ST. REL. 35 (Mar. 1990)

Ehrenreich, Nancy, Wombs for Hire, 6 TIKKUN 71 (1991)

Feldman, Susan, Multiple Biological Mothers: The Case for Gestation, 23 J. Soc.PHIL. 98 (Spring 1992)

Fischer, S., and I. Gillman, Surrogate Motherhood-Attachment, Attitudes andSocial Support, 54 PSYCHIATRY 13 (1991)

Fleck, Leonard M., Surrogate Motherhood: Is it Morally Equivalent to SellingBabies?, 9 LOGOS 135 (1988)

Fox, Robin, Babies for Sale, 27 PUBLIC INTEREST 14 (Spring 1993)

Gatens-Robinson, Eugenie, Selling Spare Parts and Renting Useful Spaces, 18J. Soc. PHIL. 28 (Winter 1987)

Glover, Jonathan, Ethics of New Reproductive Technologies: The Glover Reportto the European Commission, 100 ETHICS 925 (1990)

Harris, George W., Surrogacy, Patriarchy, and Contracts, 6 PUB. AFF. Q. 255(July 1992)

Harrison, Michelle, Women as Breeders? Ethical and Racial Issues, 5 NEWS FORWOMEN IN PSYCHIATRY 4 (July 1987)

Heyl, Barbara Sherman, Commercial Contracts and Human Connectedness, 25SoCmrY 11 (Mar.- Apr. 1988)

Hirschman, Elizabeth, Babies for Sale: Market Ethics and the New ReproductiveTechnologies, 25 J. CONSUMER AFF. 358 (1991)

Houlgate, Laurence D., Whose Child: "In Re Baby M" and the Biological Pre-ference Principle, 9 LOGOS 161 (1988)

Kermani, E.J., Issues of Child-Custody and Our Moral Values in the Era of NewMedical Technology, 31 J. AM. ACAD. CHILD AND ADOLESCENT 533 (1992)

Ketchum, Sara Ann, Selling Babies and Selling Bodies, 4 HYPATIA 116 (Fall1989)

158

Vol. 26/Pacific Law Journal

Kornegay, R. Jo, Is Commercial Surrogacy Baby-Selling?, 7 J. APPLIED PHIL. 45(Oct. 1990)

Krimmel, Herbert T., Surrogate Mother Arrangements From the Perspective ofthe Child, 9 LoGos 97 (1988)

_ ,_ The Case Against Surrogate Parenting, 13 HASTINGS CENTER REP. 35(Oct. 1983)

Kuo, Lenore, The Morality of Surrogate Mothering, 27 SO. J. PHIL. 361 (1989)

Maim, Heidi M., Commodification or Compensation: A Reply to Ketchum, 4HYPATIA 128 (1989)

_ , Paid Surrogacy: Arguments and Responses, 3 PUB. AFF. Q. 57 (Fall 1989)

May, William F., Surrogate Motherhood and the Marketplace, 85 S. ATLANTICQ. 360 (1986)

Merrick, Janna C., Selling Reproductive Rights: Policy Issues in SurrogateMotherhood, 8 POL. & LIFE Sci. 161 (1990)

Meyer, Michael J., The Idea of Selling in Surrogate Motherhood, 4 PUB. AI-. Q.175 (1990)

Miller, Tracy E., A Resounding No To Commercial Surrogacy, 18 HASTINGSCENTER REP. 4 (Aug. - Sept. 1988)

Moody-Adams, Michele M., On Surrogacy: Morality, Markets, and Motherhood,5 PuB. AFF. Q. 175 (1991)

Nelson, Hilde and James Lindemann Nelson, Cutting Motherhood in Two: SomeSuspicions Concerning Surrogacy, 4 HYPATIA 85 (Fall 1989)

Neuhaus, Richard John, Renting Women, Buying Babies and Class Struggles, 25SOCmTY 8 (Mar. - April 1988)

Newton, Lisa H., Surrogate Motherhood and the Limits of Rational Ethics, 9LOGOS 113 (1988)

Oakley, Justin, Altruistic Surrogacy and Informed Consent, 6 BIoETHIcs 269(1992)

1995 /The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood

Oliver, Kelly, Marxism and Surrogacy, 4 HYPATIA 95 (Fall 1989)

Page, Edgar, Donation, Surrogacy and Adoption, in APPLIED PHILOSOPY:MORALS AND METAPHYSICS IN CONTEMPORARY DEBATE, Brenda Almond andDonald R. Hill, eds. (New York, NY: Routledge, 1991)

Parker, P.J., Motivation of Surrogate Mothers-Initial Findings, 140 AM. J.PSYCHIATRY 117 (1983)

Pollitt, Katha, The Strange Case of Baby M, 244 THE NATION 677 (May 23, 1987)

Prokopijevic, Miroslav, Surrogate Motherhood, 7 J. APPLIED PHIL. 169 (1990)

Raymond, Janice G., Reproductive Gifts and Gift Giving: The Altruistic Woman,20 HASTINGS CENTER REPT. 7 (Nov. - Dec. 1990)

Robertson, John A., Surrogate Mothers: Not So Novel After All, 13 HASTINGSCENTER REP. 28 (Oct. 1983)

Robinson, Cheryl, Surrogate Motherhood: Implications for the Mother-FetusRelationship, 13 WOMEN & POL. 203 (1993)

Rosner, Fred, In Vitro Fertilization and Surrogate Motherhood: The Jewish View,22J. REL. HEALTH 139 (1983)

Rothman, Barbara Katz, Cheap Labor: Sex, Class, Race-and Surrogacy, 25SOCIETY 21 (Mar. - Apr. 1988)

Satz, Debra, Markets in Women's Reproduetive Labor, 21 PHIL. PUB. AFFAIRS107 (1992)

Schwartz, Lita Linzer, Psychological and Legal Perspectives on SurrogateMotherhood, 19 AM. J. FAM. THERAPY 363 (1991)

Shanley, Mary Lyndon, Surrogate Mothering and Women's Freedom: A Critiqueof Contracts for Human Reproduction, 18 SIGNS 618 (1993)

Shore, Cris, Virgin Births and Sterile Debates: Anthropology and the NewReproductive Technologies, 33 CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY 295 (June 1992)

Sistare, Christine T., Reproductive Freedom and Women's Freedom: Surrogacyand Autonomy, 19 PHIL. F. 227 (1988)

Vol. 26/Pacific Law Journal

Smith, Harlan L. and Paul A. Lewis, A Protestant View of New ReproductiveTechnologies, 14 SECOND OPINION 94 (1990)

Snowdon, C., What Makes a Mother-Interviews with Women Involved in EggDonation and Surrogacy, 21 BIRTH-IssUEs IN PERINATAL CARE 77 (1994)

Tangri, S.S., and J.R. Kahn, Ethical Issues in the New Reproductive Tech-nologies-Perspectives from Feminism and the Psychology Profession, 24PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY - RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 271 (1993)

Thornton, J.G., H.M. McNamara, and I.A. Montague, Would You Rather Be aBirth or a Genetic Mother-If So, How Much?, 20 J. MED. ETHICS 87 (1994)

Tong, Rosemarie, The Overdue Death of a Feminist Chameleon: Taking a Standon Surrogacy Arrangements, J. Soc. PHIL. 40 (Fall - Winter 1990)

Trusted, Jennifer, Gifts and Gametes: Reflections About Surrogacy, in APPLIEDPHILOSOPY: MORALS AND METAPHYSICS IN CONTEMPORARY DEBATE, BrendaAlmond and Donald R. Hill, eds. (New York, NY: Routledge, 1991)

Wertheimer, Alan, Two Questions About Surrogacy and Exploitation, 21 PHIL.PUB. AFF. 211 (1992)

White, Becky Cox, Overview of the OTA Report "Infertility: Medical and Social

Choices," 14 J. MED. PHIL. 493 (1989)

Winslade, William, Surrogate Mothers: Private Right or Public Wrong?, 9 J.MED. ETHICS 153 (1981)

Woliver, Reproductive Technologies and Surrogacy: Policy Concerns forWomen, 8 POL. & LIFE Sci. 185 (1990)

Zohar, Noam, Artificial Insemination and Surrogate Motherhood: A HalakhicPerspective, 2 S'VARA 13 (1991)

Related Bibliographies

Bach, Kathleen K., RESEARCH GUIDE, SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD (Buffalo, NY:W.S. Hein, 1987)

1995 / The Commerce of Surrogate Motherhood

Buchanan, Jim, REGULATING THE BABY MAKERS: FROM BABYMTO THE PRESENT,A BIBLIOGRAPHY (Montecello, IL: Vance Bibliographies, 1991)

_.__ BABYM & SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD: A RESOURCE GUIDE (Monticello,IL: Vance Bibliographies, 1987)

Peritore, Laura, A Select Bibliography on Surrogacy (Special Issue onSurrogacy), 22 FAM. LAW. Q. 213 (1988)

Robbins, Sara, SURROGATE PARENTING: AN ANNOTATED REVIEW OF THELITERATURE (Brooklyn, NY: CompuBibs, 1984)

Dissertations and Conference Papers

Asch, Adrienne, VALUES, ATTITUDES, AND PUBLIC POLICY: THE CASE OFSURROGATE MOTHERHOOD (Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 1992)

Fischer, Susan Hardwick, ATTACHMENT AND SELF-REPORTED BEHAVIORS OFSURROGATE MOTHERS AND NON-SURROGATE MOTHERS DURING PREGNANCY(Ph.D., diss., Hofstra University, 1989)

Gunn, Nancy, TRAP NEST (AN OPERA): ACT I, Libretto by Thalia Field (anoriginal composition about a surrogate mother who reconsiders her decision)(Ph.D. diss., City University of New York, 1993)

Hill, John Lawrence, IN DEFENSE OF SURROGATE PARENTING ARRANGEMENTS:AN ETHICAL AND LEGAL ANALYSIS (Ph.D. diss., Georgetown University, 1989)

Nygaard, Vicki Leanne, USING FEMINIST SOCIOLOGY AS A THEORETICALAPPROACH IN EXAMINING ISSUES CONCERNING REPRODUCTIVE TECHNOLOGIES(M.A. thesis, University of Victoria, 1992)

Patterson, Cynthia Ann, CONTRACTUAL REPRODUCTION: LEGAL, POLITICAL, ANDETHICAL PERSPECTIVES OF SURROGATE MOTHERHOOD (M.A. thesis, Universityof Louisville, 1988)

Resnick, Rita Fay, SURROGATE MOTHERS: THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN EARLYATrACHMENT AND THE RELINQUISHING OF A CHILD (Ph.D. diss., The FieldingInstitute, 1989)

Vol. 26/Pacific Law Journal

Shah, Leena Das, THE ISSUE OF SURROGATE MOTHERING: A SOCIAL REGU-LATORY POLICY-MAKING MODEL, 1980-1990 (Ph.D. diss., University of Idaho,1991)

Waters, Anne Schulherr, MORALITY, LAW, AND POLITICS: REPRODUCTION AND

SURROGACY (Ph.D. diss., Purdue University, 1992)