Upload
lam
View
54
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
The Cognitive Agent. Overcoming informational limits Orlin Vakarelov Philosophy & Cognitive Science University of Arizona. Synopsis. Question: What are the systems for which the capacity of cognition is useful and what “function” does it serve? Answer: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
The Cognitive AgentThe Cognitive Agent
Overcoming informational limits
Orlin VakarelovPhilosophy & Cognitive ScienceUniversity of Arizona
SynopsisSynopsisQuestion:
◦ What are the systems for which the capacity of cognition is useful and what “function” does it serve?
Answer:◦ The “function” of cognition is to allow
informationally deprived autonomous agents to overcome the informational deficit so that they can have more successful behaviour.
◦ In a sense, cognition is that which makes agents smarter.
Cognitio 09 2
Cognition vs. cognitionCognition is essentially an embedded and
embodied phenomenon, and is related to system control of the dynamical interactions with environment.
Cognition is a phenomenon of complexity, i.e. it exist only within complex, organized systems, and it is possible in virtue of the complexity.
AssumptionsAssumptions
3Cognitio 09
A minimal approachA minimal approachMaturana & Varela1 – autopoiesis
◦ A system is autopoiesis iff it can actively maintain itself by implementing a process closure, and it can maintain separation from the environment.
M & V claim: Autopoiesis implies both life and cognition.◦ Natural teleology, self-reference, meaning,
perspective (umwelt), etc.Di Paolo2: Autopoiesis is a structural condition,
while adaptiveness is not. Cognition requires adaptiveness. Therefore, autopoiesis does not cognition.
1 H. R. Maturana & F. J. Varela (1980) Autopoiesis and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Dordecht: D. Reidel Publishing Co 2 Di Paolo, E. A., (2005). Autopoiesis, adaptivity, teleology, agency. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(4): 429 - 452. 4Cognitio 09
MethodologyMethodologyBottom-up approach
◦ The theoretical distinctions must correspond to natural dynamical/system theoretic distinctions arising from the increasing complexity of organization of the systems.
◦ I.e. if you are wondering among various systems, you should be able to stumble on the collection of cognitive system.
I describe a sequence of nested design problems whose general strategies for solution warrant theoretical distinctions – cognition is viewed as one such general strategy for a problem.
Autonomy Agency Cognitive Agency
5Cognitio 09
AutonomyAutonomy
6Cognitio 09
AutonomyAutonomy
7Cognitio 09
AgentsAgents
8Cognitio 09
Informational LimitsInformational Limits
9Cognitio 09
Sequence of problems Sequence of problems and systemsand systems
Cognitio 09 10
Cognitive Agents Cognitive Agents
11Cognitio 09
Back to the familiarBack to the familiar Two general strategies for CIE lowering
◦ Internalize efficiently information from the environment so that you don’t have to communicate it.
◦ Focus on the most relevant source of information. More specific strategies:
◦ accumulation and integration of information over time; ◦ targeting specific useful feature of the environment; ◦ building internal structures that encode information
about the environment and its dynamics, and using them to anticipate the future state of the environment based on limited information from perception;
◦ going beyond the immediate information thought informational transformations (with reasoning capacities), etc.
The prototypical cognitive capacities accomplish exactly such tasks: learning, memory, feature detection, representation, reasoning, etc.
12Cognitio 09