Upload
calvin-randall
View
214
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
The Case for a Vermont Carbon Tax
Rationale
• Simplification– Replace existing energy taxes with a single tax on
carbon content of fuels.
• Behavioral Change– Encourage reduced consumption of fossil fuels and
reduced CO2 emissions.
• Revenue Leveraging– Make use of revenues to purchase energy saving
efficiencies and alternatives to fossil fuels.
Current Energy Taxes
Rate ‘04 Revenue
Gasoline Tax $.19 / gal 71.9
Diesel Tax $.26 / gal 18
Sales Tax on Comm. Energy
5%* (with exceptions)
15
Utilities Gross Receipts
.3-.5% of gross oper. revenue
5.7
Fuel Gross Receipts
.5% on retail sales
5.5
TOTAL 116.1
Carbon Tax: Pro/Con
• PRO• Broad influence-
consumers, transport.• Low transaction costs• Ease of
administration• Produces recyclable
revenue
• CON• Emissions reductions
not predictable• Vulnerable pricing
due to inflation/ price shocks
• Not targeted to reduce all GHG’s.
• Regressive
Carbon Tax Proposal
• $100 per ton tax on carbon content of fuels.
• Applied at point where fuels enter vermont economy.
• Revenues recycled back to taxpayers (individual and commercial).
• Comparable tax on nuclear and large hydro (market competitiveness).
Revenue Estimates
$100/ton + tax on hydro/nukes
Minus existing energy taxes
Total 364,500,000 248,400,000
Residential 112,400,000 76,600,000
Commercial 71,500,000 48,800,000
Industrial 53,000,000 36,100,000
Transportation 127,500,000 86,900,000
Price Effects on Fuels
2004 Increase
Gasoline ($ per gallon) .29 -.19 = +.10 increase
Electricity (cents / kWh) +.01 - existing taxes
Natural gas (cents/ therm)
+17.2 - existing taxes
Fuel Oil ($ per gallon) +.34 - existing taxes
Coal ($ per ton) +76 - existing taxes
Energy Savings and CO2 Reductions
Energy Use (TBTU) 125.56
Energy Saved (TBTU) 4.98
GHG Emissions (CO2 equiv. tons) 9,702,000
GHG Emissions Reduced (CO2 equiv. tons)
386,000
Trading Carbon Offsets
• Emerging markets for emissions/ sequestration trading:– Kyoto Signatory nations– EU cap and trade system (2005)– Chicago Climate Exchange– Northeastern States cap and trade system (2005)
• Allows for trading CO2 emissions with carbon sequestering “sinks.”
• “the biggest commodities market in the world.” -R. Sandor (Northwestern Univ. / CCX)
Carbon Trading Potential for VT Agricultural/Forest Land
• States (NE,AK) have begun quantifying sequestration potential of land.
• VT forests hold a carbon stock of 492.6 MMTC (1997).
• Carbon tax revenues can be used to quantify capacity/pool land holdings/define compliance mechanisms for trading.
• US farmers can sequester 200 MMTC annually / add $4-6 billion gross income (10% increase in average net farm income).