The campaigning NGO for greater environmental and social justice, with a focus on forests and forest peoples rights in the policies and practices of the EU

How to influencethe VPA process effectively and contribute to its implementation

Lessons learned

8th FLEGT Coordination meeting

9 October 2013Indra Van Gisbergen

Influencing the VPA process

Each phase = opportunity for civil society influence future of forests and communities

Challenge for civil society = get ready, get involved, and make the most of the opportunity

FERN supports national NGOs/platforms to participate effectively at the VPA process

Influencing = participating effectively

Create Space

& Take Place

Find Allies Build strongCoalitions

Own the process

Ex. Community participation in

Liberia Involvement

Ex. Link with Communitiy’s rights Network

(CRN)

Ex. Platform in RoC fought GONGOs

Move up on the participation ladder

Participation at VPA negotiations

An unprecedented experience Vietnam: Vietnamese Governement aims to control process –CS had to define its own agenda

CS set up a ‘VNGO FLEGT network’, developed network modalities, consolidated its position and communicatedwith government

Outcomes of opening up space: Improved communication with government By actively following VPA negotiations CSO

capacities has increased Brought socio-economic issues to the attention

of natnioal and international

Participating changed attitudes

Participation at VPA negotiations

Ghana: Had already coalition « Forest Watch Ghana » in place – No intention of government to make it an inclusive process – Keys to success: threat of legal action + media attention RoC: No CS participation history – strong independant platform with

common agenda emerged rapidlyLiberia: Exceptional case – CS NGOs + local forest communities involved

Participation changed policy-making

Including social dimensions in CAR’s VPA

&$ 5

5 HFRJQLWLRQ FXVWRP DU\ ULJKWV

Yes. Recognition and of local and indigenous communities customary rights of access to and use of forest concessions by company

) 3 ,& -&RQVXOWDWLRQFRP P XQLWLHVRQ

FRQFHVVLRQDOORFDWLRQ

No. But according to the Forest Code the government should inform communities prior to delivering permit

6RFLR-HFRQRP LF VWXGLHV

Yes

6RFLDOREOLJDWLRQV VRFLDOFRQWUDFWSURMHFWRUEHQHILW

VKDULQJP RQH\

Yes

&RP SHQVDWLRQ GDP DJH

Yes

&RQIOLFW UHVROXWLRQ

Yes

Contributing to VPA implementation

Consolidating created space,

A challenge in Cameroon

•Reform of the Forest Code provided by VPA •Government aims to control legal reform •CS complains forest reform is not participatory •Letter of UNCERD underlines right to participation of IPs •Concerns about lack of participatory reform process discussed at CCS and Joint Implementation council (July 2013)

Contributing to VPA implementation

VPA motor for legal reform in RoC

•The VPA provides reform of 18 legal texts (non exhaustive list) + participatory reform process •Legal reform offers opportunity to strengthen substantial and procedural community rights, increase control over land •CS complains about lack of participation

violating the VPA •CSOs now involved in process

Contributing to VPA implementation

Using VPA to halt PUPs in Liberia •Explosion of Private Use Permits •Cover immense area - issued quickly - threat to forests + rights•NGOs concerned: PUPs were exporting more logs than forestry concessions – launch of large campaign •CSO complained about PUPs violating the VPA•Moratorium on new PUPs + investigative committee •All PUPs cancelled and Minister of agriculture suspended

Contributing to VPA implementation

VPA a tool to address land grabbing & illegal forest conversion in Cameroon •Cameroon: soon >30% of production will from illegal conversion for commercial agriculture (palm oil) – threat to forests + rights •Show case: Herakles Farms case violates the VPA - (legality not respected + no consultations)•CSO concerns shared by the EU – recognition that VPA is under threat •Achievements:

– Issues of illegal conversion and large scale land acquisitions are in the public and political domain

– EU recently asked permission for an investigation in the HF case

Some conclusions

1. Participating at VPA negotiations = unprecedented experience in many countries

2. Creating space and maintaining place is challenging during the entire VPA life time

3. VPA is a useful entry point for dialogue with the EU, the Government and other stakeholders

4. VPA as a practical tool to be used creatively:

- to secure tenure and community rights

- to improve forest governance

- to address underlying drivers of deforestation

Rue d’Edimbourg 26 1000 Bruxelles Belgique

t +32 2 894 4693       e indra@fern.org

www.fern.org

The campaigning NGO for greater environmental and social justice, with a focus on forests and forest peoples rights in the policies and practices of the EU